Tirzepatide and blood pressure reduction: stratified analyses of the SURMOUNT-1 randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Treating obesity may be a pathway to prevent and control hypertension. In the SURMOUNT-1 trial in people with obesity or overweight with weight-related complications, 72-week tirzepatide treatment led to clinically meaningful body weight and blood pressure reduction. Post hoc analyses were conducted to further explore the effects of tirzepatide on the pattern of blood pressure reduction and whether the effects were consistent across various subgroups. METHODS: The mixed effect for repeated measure model was used to compare changes in overall blood pressure, across demographic and clinical subgroups, baseline blood pressure subgroups and hypertension categories between SURMOUNT-1 participants randomised to treatment with tirzepatide and placebo. The association between weight changes and blood pressure and adverse events associated with low blood pressure were also evaluated by mediation analysis. RESULTS: Tirzepatide treatment was associated with a rapid decline in systolic and diastolic blood pressure over the first 24 weeks, followed by blood pressure stabilisation until the end of the observation period, resulting in a significant net reduction by 72 weeks of 6.8 mm Hg systolic and 4.2 mm Hg diastolic blood pressure versus placebo. Participants randomly assigned to any tirzepatide group were more likely than those assigned to placebo to have normal blood pressure at week 72 (58.0% vs 35.2%, respectively). The effects were broadly consistent across baseline blood pressure subgroups, shifting the blood pressure distribution curve to lower blood pressure levels. The mediation analysis indicated that weight loss explained 68% of the systolic and 71% of the diastolic blood pressure reduction. Low blood pressure adverse events were infrequent, but the rate was higher in the tirzepatide group. CONCLUSIONS: In these post hoc analyses, in participants with obesity or overweight, tirzepatide was associated with reduced blood pressure consistently across participant groups primarily via weight loss, with relatively few blood pressure-related adverse events. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04184622.

Comparison of insulin lispro with regular human insulin for the treatment of type 1 diabetes in adolescents.

BACKGROUND: Although insulin lispro (insulin LP) has been shown to improve postprandial blood glucose (BG) control and reduce hypoglycemic episodes in adult patients with type I diabetes, there appear to have been few clinical studies focusing on its use in adolescents. OBJECTIVE: This study compared the effects of insulin LP with those of regular human insulin (insulin R) on postprandial BG control and hypoglycemia in adolescents with type diabetes. METHODS: In this crossover, open-label study, adolescents between the ages of 9 and 18 years who had reached Tanner stage II puberty were randomized to receive either insulin LP immediately before meals or insulin R 30 to 45 minutes before meals, in addition to daily intermediate-acting insulin. After 4 months, patients were switched to the alternate treatment sequence. Eight-point BG profiles, hypoglycemia rate, and glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) were measured at baseline and end point. RESULTS: Four hundred eighty-one adolescents participated in the study at 53 investigative sites in 15 countries; 463 were randomized to treatment (228 insulin LP, 235 insulin R), and 457 completed the study. Insulin LP given before breakfast resulted in significantly lower mean (+/-SD) 2-hour postprandial BG levels compared with insulin R (9.7 +/- 4.0 mmol/L vs 10.6 +/- 4.3 mmol/L, respectively; P < 0.001). Insulin LP given before dinner resulted in significantly lower 2-hour postprandial BG levels compared with insulin R (8.6 +/- 3.5 mmol/L vs 9.3 +/- 3.7 mmol/L; P = 0.003). No differences were seen between treatments in 2-hour postprandial BG levels after the midday meal. Mean baseline HbA1c values were similar between sequence groups, and no between-group difference in HbA1c was observed at end point (insulin LP, 8.69% +/- 1.52%; insulin R, 8.70% +/- 1.65%). Treatment with insulin LP resulted in a significantly lower incidence of hypoglycemic episodes per patient per 30 days compared with insulin R (4.02 +/- 4.5 vs 4.37 +/- 4.5, respectively; P = 0.023) and significantly fewer hypoglycemic episodes between midnight and 6 AM (1.0 +/- 1.9 vs 1.7 +/- 2.6; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In adolescents with type 1 diabetes, insulin LP significantly improved postprandial glycemic control and reduced episodes of nocturnal hypoglycemia compared with insulin R. Insulin LP was well tolerated and effective as part of an intensified insulin regimen in this study population.