Asymptomatic versus symptomatic episodes in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation via long-term monitoring with implantable loop recorders.

BACKGROUND: The presentation of atrial fibrillation (AF) varies remarkably, from totally asymptomatic to symptomatic patients, while the same individual may present symptomatic and asymptomatic episodes. We aimed to identify electrocardiographic differences between symptomatic and asymptomatic episodes and to find parameters related to the appearance of symptoms. METHODS: Thirty consecutive patients (age 66.9±10years) with paroxysmal AF received an implantable loop recorder. Three types of episodes were defined: asymptomatic (ASx), symptomatic (Sx), and mixed asymptomatic-symptomatic (AS-Sx). The heart rate (HR) and heart rate variability (HRV) were recorded during the first 2min of each ASx or Sx episode, and during the first 2min of both the symptomatic and asymptomatic periods in AS-Sx. RESULTS: Eighty-two episodes from twenty-five patients were evaluated. Mean HR was 142.48±25.84bpm for Sx and 95.71±19.29bpm for ASx (p<0.001). Mean HRV was 92.62±42.29ms for Sx and 150.06±49.68ms for ASx (p<0.001). In AS-Sx, mean HR was 102.91±24.54bpm for the asymptomatic and 141.88±23.43bpm for the symptomatic period (p<0.001). Mean HRV was 173.55±61.30ms for the asymptomatic and 87.33±30.65ms for the symptomatic period (p=0.003). There were no significant correlations between patients' characteristics and the clinical presentation of the arrhythmia. CONCLUSIONS: The ASx were characterized by a lower HR and higher HRV compared to Sx. In As-Sx, the asymptomatic period was characterized by a lower HR and higher HRV compared to the symptomatic. These findings suggest a possible contribution of variations in the autonomic nervous system activity to the perception of the arrhythmia.

Changes in atrial electrical properties following cardioversion of chronic atrial fibrillation: relation with recurrence.

OBJECTIVE: To study the reversibility of atrial electrical remodeling and its relation with recurrence in post-conversion chronic atrial fibrillation (CAF) patients. METHODS: In 28 drug-free CAF patients (mean AF duration 41+/-39 months) electrically converted to sinus rhythm effective refractory period (ERP) at 500 ms, monophasic action potential at 90% of repolarization (MAPd90) at five cycle lengths (CL, 350, 400, 450, 500, 600 ms), and P wave duration were measured three times: within the interval 5-20 min post-conversion, 24 h and 1 month later. Fifteen subjects with no history of AF and normal atrial structure served as a control group. Patients were followed up for recurrence for 1 month; 12 relapsed. RESULTS: ERP changed from 205+/-20 to 243+/-31 to 241+/-24 ms (P<0. 001), attaining a level comparable to that of the controls (238+/-21 ms) within 24 h. MAPd90 significantly (P<0.001) increased (from 175+/-11 to 190+/-19 to 191+/-10 ms at CL 350 ms and 201+/-12 to 234+/-20 and 233+/-23 ms at CL 600 ms) also reaching control levels within 24 h. MAPd90 exhibited an abnormal adaptation to rate only in the first evaluation. P wave duration was prolonged (137+/-33 ms) and exhibited a slower course of shortening (130+/-32 to 123+/-27 ms, P<0.001), reaching control levels within 1 month. Patients with higher values of MAPd90 at CL 350 in the immediate post-conversion period were more likely to relapse (P<0.005). CONCLUSIONS: ERP and repolarization shortening as a result of CAF are reversed within 24 h after conversion, while P wave duration reduces more slowly. Post-conversion MAPd90 values contain prognostic information for recurrence.

Relation of autonomic modulation to recurrence of atrial fibrillation following cardioversion.

The aim of this study was to investigate the time course of changes in autonomic nervous system activity in patients with long-standing atrial fibrillation (AF) following internal electrical conversion to sinus rhythm and to look for differences between patients who do and do not relapse. Time-domain indexes of heart rate variability were calculated from 24-hour Holter recordings on the day of conversion and 1 day and 1 month afterward for 22 patients with chronic (> 3 months) AF. Ten healthy subjects served as a control group. During the day of cardioversion the mean RR interval and its circadian variation differed significantly between controls and patients. The mean values of successive RR intervals that deviated by > 50% from the prior RR interval and the root-mean-square of successive RR interval differences--indexes of vagal modulation--were initially significantly higher in patients than in controls but showed a decrease (p < 0.05) by the second day (from 12.4 +/- 7% to 8.1 +/- 5% to 7.3 +/- 5% and from 49 +/- 9 to 39 +/- 12 to 41 +/- 11 ms, respectively) to levels similar to those of the controls (7.6 +/- 5% and 40 +/- 17 ms, respectively). Only these 2 indexes contained significant prognostic information about relapse: patients who later relapsed had higher initial values than those who did not, and these values remained high during the 2 days after conversion. In conclusion, this study provides data confirming that spontaneous chronic AF in humans results in a significant increase in vagal tone that is reversed with time after restoration of sinus rhythm. Persistently higher values of vagal tone are observed in patients who relapse, and are probably a predictor for recurrence.

The role of the post-cardioversion time course of hs-CRP levels in clarifying the relationship between inflammation and persistence of atrial fibrillation.

OBJECTIVES: Although recent studies suggest that inflammation is involved in the pathogenesis of atrial fibrillation (AF), it remains controversial whether it is a consequence or a cause of the arrhythmia. DESIGN: Prospective study. SETTING: Tertiary referral centre. PATIENTS AND INTERVENTIONS: In 52 patients with persistent AF lasting >3 months, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) was measured before and after electrical cardioversion. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: All patients were successfully cardioverted to sinus rhythm (SR), but the recurrence rate was 23% at 1 month. Baseline hs-CRP was higher in patients with AF recurrence than in those who remained in SR (0.5 (SD 0.18) mg/dl vs 0.29 (SD 0.13) mg/dl, respectively, p<0.001). Similarly, arrhythmia recurrence was associated with greater left atrial diameters (45.4 (SD 3.3) mm vs 40.7 (SD 3.1) mm, respectively, p<0.001). However, logistic regression analysis showed that hs-CRP was the only independent predictor for AF recurrence (p<0.001). Additionally, patients who were in SR on final evaluation had significantly lower hs-CRP levels than at baseline (0.10 (SD 0.06) mg/dl vs 0.29 (SD 0.13) mg/dl, respectively, p<0.001), while those who experienced AF recurrence had similar values on final and on initial evaluation (0.56 (SD 0.24) mg/dl vs 0.50 (SD 0.18) mg/dl, respectively, p = 0.42). CONCLUSION: High levels of hs-CRP are associated with an increased risk of AF recurrence after cardioversion. The restoration and maintenance of SR result in a gradual decrease of hs-CRP while AF recurrence has a different effect, suggesting that inflammation is a consequence, rather than a cause, of AF.

Dobutamine- vs exercise-induced ST segment elevation early after Q wave myocardial infarction. Prediction of functional recovery after revascularization.

AIMS: The association between stress-induced ST elevation and functional recovery following revascularization after myocardial infarction remains unclear. We assessed the relative accuracy of dobutamine- and exercise-induced ST elevation in Q wave leads in predicting functional recovery following revascularization, and we investigated the relationship of ST elevation to different wall motion responses to dobutamine. METHODS AND RESULTS: Thirty-nine patients underwent dobutamine stress echo and exercise test 8+/-2 days after Q wave myocardial infarction. All patients underwent angiography and subsequent revascularization. Follow-up echocardiograms were obtained 7+/-4 weeks after revascularization. Functional recovery was assessed by the difference between the baseline and the follow-up asynergy index. Nineteen patients (48%) developed dobutamine- and exercise-induced ST elevation. There was significant agreement between the tests (k=0.58, P<0.001). We found a significant correlation between dobutamine and exercise-induced ST elevation with functional recovery following revascularization (r=0. 45, P<0.005 and r=0.7, P<0.001, respectively). The parameters with the highest predictive value for functional recovery were: (a) the biphasic response during dobutamine infusion, (b) the development of ST elevation in both tests, and (c) the development of exercise-induced ST elevation in more than three leads. CONCLUSION: There is a strong association between dobutamine- and exercise-induced ST elevation with functional recovery following revascularization. Exercise-induced ST elevation in more than three leads and a biphasic response during dobutamine infusion accurately predict functional recovery.

Sinus pacemaker function after cardioversion of chronic atrial fibrillation: is sinus node remodeling related with recurrence?

INTRODUCTION: The objective of this study was to investigate the temporal changes in sinus node function in postcardioversion chronic atrial fibrillation (AF) patients and their possible relation with the recurrence rates of AF. METHODS AND RESULTS: In 37 chronic AF patients, internally cardioverted to sinus rhythm, corrected sinus node recovery time (CSNRT), and the pattern of corrected return cycle lengths were assessed 5 to 20 minutes and 24 hours after conversion. The last 20 consecutive patients also were evaluated after autonomic blockade. Twenty subjects with normal atrial structure and no history of AF served as the control group. Patients were followed-up for 1 month for recurrence, and the density of supraventricular ectopic beats per hour was obtained during the first 24 hours after conversion. Fifteen patients (40.5%) relapsed during follow-up. CSNRT values at 600 msec (371 +/- 182 msec) and 500 ms (445 +/- 338 msec) were significantly higher than those of control subjects (278 +/- 157 msec, P = 0.050, and 279 +/- 130 msec, P = 0.037, respectively). Significant temporal changes in CSNRT also were observed during the first 24 hours after conversion (600 msec: 308 +/- 120 msec, P = 0.034; 500 msec: 340 +/- 208 msec, P = 0.017). No significant interaction and temporal effects were observed with regard to corrected return cycle length pattern. Similar data regarding CSNRT and corrected return cycle length pattern were obtained after autonomic blockade. Patients with abnormal CSNRT after cardioversion had higher recurrence rates (50%) than those with normal function (37%; P = NS). Patients who relapsed had a higher density of supraventricular ectopic beats per hour (159 +/- 120) compared with those who did not (35 +/- 37; P = 0.001). CONCLUSION: Depressed sinus node function is observed after conversion of chronic AF. Recovery from this abnormality and its independence from autonomic function suggest that AF remodels the sinus node. Our data do not support a causative role of sinus node function in AF recurrence, but they do indicate such a role for the density of atrial ectopic beats.

Atrial defibrillation threshold in humans minutes after atrial fibrillation induction; "A stitch in time saves nine".

AIMS: To assess the effects of atrial fibrillation duration on the defibrillation threshold in atrial fibrillation patients seconds or minutes after initiation of the arrhythmia. METHODS AND RESULTS: Nineteen patients with recurrent symptomatic atrial fibrillation were evaluated. After programmed induction of atrial fibrillation, the defibrillation threshold was assessed after two sequential periods of arrhythmia in the same patient: an "ultrashort" period of 30 s duration and a "short" period, which lasted 10 min. After the specified period, internal cardioversion was attempted using a balloon-guided catheter that allows the delivery of biphasic shocks between one electrode array placed in the left pulmonary artery and a proximal electrode array on the lateral right atrial wall. The defibrillation threshold was assessed with energy steps of 0.5 J with a starting level of 0.5 J. Mean time from induction to successful defibrillation was 92+/-30 s after the "ultrashort" period of atrial fibrillation and 910+/-86 s after the short period. The defibrillation threshold was significantly greater after 10 min of atrial fibrillation than after 30 s of arrhythmia (2.32+/-0.61 J vs 1.31+/-0.66 J, P<0.001). Clinical data were not found to affect the defibrillation threshold. CONCLUSIONS: Prolongation of atrial fibrillation over minutes in patients with paroxysmal arrhythmia increases the energy requirements for successful defibrillation.

Amiodarone, sotalol, or propafenone in atrial fibrillation: which is preferred to maintain normal sinus rhythm?

UNLABELLED: This randomized study compared the efficacy and safety of amiodarone, propafenone and sotalol in the prevention of atrial fibrillation. METHODS: The population consisted of 214 consecutive patients (mean age 64 +/- 8 years, 106 men) with recurrent symptomatic atrial fibrillation. After restoration of sinus rhythm, patients were randomized to amiodarone (200 mg/day), propafenone (450 mg/day) or sotalol (320 +/- 20 mg/day). Follow-up evaluations were conducted at 1, 2, 4 and 6 months, and at 3-month intervals thereafter. The proportion of patients developing recurrent atrial fibrillation and/or experiencing unacceptable adverse effects was measured in the three groups by the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: Recurrent atrial fibrillation occurred in 25 of the 75 patients treated with amiodarone compared to 51 of the 75 patients treated with sotalol and 24 of the 64 patients treated with propafenone. Fourteen patients treated with amiodarone, five with sotalol, and one with propafenone experienced adverse effects while in sinus rhythm, necessitating discontinuation of treatment (P < 0.001 for amiodarone and propafenone vs sotalol). The difference between amiodarone and propafenone was statistically nonsignificant when all events were included in the analysis. However, if the analysis was limited to recurrent atrial fibrillation events, amiodarone was more effective than propafenone (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Amiodarone and propafenone were superior to sotalol in maintaining long-term normal sinus rhythm in patients with atrial fibrillation. Amiodarone tended to be superior to propafenone, though its long-term efficacy was limited by adverse side effects.

Sotalol vs metoprolol for ventricular rate control in patients with chronic atrial fibrillation who have undergone digitalization: a single-blinded crossover study.

AIMS: To compare the effects of sotalol and metoprolol on heart rate, during isotonic (ITE) and isometric (IME) exercise and daily activities, in digitalized patients with chronic atrial fibrillation. METHODS AND RESULTS: The study had a randomized, single-blinded, crossover design. Twenty-three patients with chronic atrial fibrillation received placebo for 4 weeks, followed by a 4-week period of treatment with sotalol and metoprolol in random order. At the end of each period, the patients were assessed with 24-h ECG monitoring, a cardiopulmonary exercise test and a handgrip manoeuvre. Both agents produced a lower heart rate than placebo at rest and at all levels of isotonic exercise (P < 0.001) without affecting oxygen uptake. Sotalol produced a lower heart rate than metoprolol only at submaximal exercise (116 +/- 9 bpm for sotalol vs 125 +/- 11 bpm for metoprolol, P < 0.001). During isometric exercise, sotalol produced a lower maximum heart rate than did metoprolol (113 +/- 22 vs 129 +/- 18 bpm, respectively). Both agents produced a lower mean heart rate than placebo over 24 h (P < 0.001 for all), while sotalol produced a lower mean heart rate than metoprolol during the daytime (P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Sotalol is a safe and effective agent for control of heart rate in digitalized patients with atrial fibrillation. Sotalol is superior to metoprolol at submaximal exercise, resulting in better rate control during daily activities.

Atrial and ventricular refractoriness in paced patients; circadian variation and its relationship to autonomic nervous system activity.

AIMS: To examine whether atrial and ventricular effective refractory periods exhibit circadian variation and whether the latter is correlated with fluctuations in autonomic nervous system tone. METHODS AND RESULTS: We studied 24 patients aged 67.1 +/- 9.6 years, 11 of whom were paced for complete heart block and 13 for sick sinus syndrome. Atrial and ventricular effective refractory periods were measured bihourly over a 24-h period, using the pacemaker programming capabilities, at basic cycle lengths of 600 ms and 500 ms. During the same time period we evaluated autonomic nervous system activity in patients paced for complete heart block, expressed by spectral power indexes in low frequency and high frequency areas of heart rate variability. Atrial and ventricular effective refractory periods showed significant circadian variation at both basic cycle lengths, with the highest values occurring between 22:00 and 06:00. At times, the atrial and ventricular effective refractory periods of the patients with sick sinus syndrome differed significantly from those with complete heart block. Furthermore, atrial and ventricular effective refractory periods in patients with complete heart block exhibited a strong negative correlation with the low frequency/high frequency ratio. CONCLUSION: Our data show that atrial and ventricular effective refractory periods in DDD paced patients exhibit significant circadian variation that is strongly correlated with variations in autonomic nervous system activity in patients with complete heart block.