A value analysis of longitudinal integrated clerkships: consideration of costs and benefits.

Longitudinal Integrated Clerkships (LICs) prioritise longitudinal relationships with faculty, patients, and place. Research shows that LICs benefit students and faculty, but most medical schools have limited LIC programmes. This is likely due to perceptions that LICs are more costly and complex than traditional block rotations (TBRs). The perceived cost versus evidence-based value related to clerkship education has not been examined in detail. Until recently, no 'All-LIC' medical school exemplars existed in the US, limiting the value of this model as well as the ability to examine relative cost and complexity. In this paper, we draw on our experience launching three 'All-LIC' medical schools in the United States - schools in which the entire clerkship class participates in a comprehensive clerkship-year LIC. We propose that the known benefits of LICs coupled with cost-mitigation strategies related to running an 'All LIC' model for core clinical clerkships, rather than block and LIC models simultaneously, results in a higher value for medical schools.

Clinical Assessment Specialists: A New Faculty Role to Improve Clerkship Assessment.

INTRODUCTION: Ambulatory clerkships, including longitudinal integrated clerkships (LICs), face challenges to assessment, including time pressure and clinical demands on preceptors. High-quality clinical assessment is critical to implementing competency-based medical education, generating valid grades, and supporting learning. This importance is further heightened with the new pass/fail scoring for US Medical Licensing Exam Step 1, discontinuation of US Medical Licensing Exam Step 2 Clinical Skills, and the growing concern for bias in assessment. METHODS: The Kaiser Permanente Bernard J. Tyson School of Medicine's LIC spans the first 2 years with 50 students per class. In 2021-2022, the authors created a new faculty role, the clinical assessment specialist (CASp). CASps are highly trained clinical teachers who directly observe clerkship students in the ambulatory setting, provide feedback, and complete competency-based assessment forms. RESULTS: CASps completed 186 assessments of first-year (Y1) LIC students and 333 assessments of second-year (Y2) LIC students. Y2 students achieved average higher milestones and were rated as requiring less supervision compared to Y1 students. Y1 students rated CASps more favorably than Y2 students. Preceptors rated the contribution of CASps similarly across both years. Clerkship directors described benefits including identification of at-risk students and value of augmenting preceptor assessments. DISCUSSION: The CASp role may offer an innovative way to generate valid assessment of student performance, offset clinical pressures faced by preceptors, identify at-risk students, and mitigate bias, especially in an LIC. Future studies may examine assessment validity, including use in summative assessment. CONCLUSION: CASps are an innovative approach to clinical clerkship assessment.

Quality and Health Equity Dashboards for Internal Medicine Residents: Interactive Displays to Promote Systems-Based Practice and Practice-Based Learning and Improvement.

Background Quality measures help identify gaps and disparities in care delivery and prioritize opportunities to improve health. Calls to enhance Systems-Based Practice and Practice-Based Learning and Improvement competencies for residency training cite the need for quality measures for trainees as central to this effort. The authors sought to demonstrate the feasibility of creating a residency program data visualization dashboard to examine individual and program quality measures for an internal medicine residency program within Kaiser Permanente Northern California. Methods An interactive display was developed to allow for easy visualization of quality and operational measures through an iterative design process. The dashboard displays data for individual residents, residency classes (PGY1-3), and the entire program, including quality measures, systems measures, and patient diagnoses. An iterative process continues to improve the functionality and usefulness of the dashboard. Results It is feasible to create a dashboard to visualize individual and program quality measures and health equity measures for a residency program using a learner-centered approach and alignment with institutional goals through collaboration between education and operational teams. Future studies will examine the audit and feedback process, resident perceptions, and changes to patient outcomes. Conclusion Use of dashboards in graduate medical education is feasible and can be used to help residents and residency programs identify gaps in quality of care.

Listening Beyond Auscultating: A Quality Initiative to Improve Communication Scores in the Hospital Consumer Assessment of Health Care Practitioners and Systems Survey.

INTRODUCTION: Physician communication is critical to patient care. However, integration of sound communication practice with clinical workflows has proven difficult. In this quality improvement initiative, medical students used the rapid improvement model to test interventions that could enhance patients' perception of listening by physicians as measured by the Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems survey. METHODS: Literature review and process analysis yielded 42 potential interventions, of which 24 were feasible for implementation. Small-scale testing established the 4 most promising interventions; pilot testing was subsequently undertaken on the entire Medicine service. Patient and physician feedback guided further refinement. The final intervention used a structured reminder embedded in the electronic health record to direct physicians to begin interviews by eliciting patient concerns. RESULTS: Patient concerns elicited after implementation included pain symptoms (28%), disease or treatment course (16%), and discharge planning (10%). In the Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems survey, physician listening scores rose from a 2014 average of 73.6% to 77% in 2015. DISCUSSION: Among 24 tested interventions, an open-ended question was most feasible and had the greatest perceived impact by hospitalists and patients. A structured reminder embedded in required electronic medical record documentation facilitated the behavioral change without being overly burdensome to physicians and established a mechanism to enact change in practice. CONCLUSION: Medical students used established improvement methods to promote patient-centered care and align patient and physician agendas, providing a strategy to improve hospitalized patients' perceptions of physician listening.

Creating a longitudinal integrated clerkship with mutual benefits for an academic medical center and a community health system.

The longitudinal integrated clerkship is a model of clinical education driven by tenets of social cognitive theory, situated learning, and workplace learning theories, and built on a foundation of continuity between students, patients, clinicians, and a system of care. Principles and goals of this type of clerkship are aligned with primary care principles, including patient-centered care and systems-based practice. Academic medical centers can partner with community health systems around a longitudinal integrated clerkship to provide mutual benefits for both organizations, creating a sustainable model of clinical training that addresses medical education and community health needs. A successful one-year longitudinal integrated clerkship was created in partnership between an academic medical center and an integrated community health system. Compared with traditional clerkship students, students in this clerkship had better scores on Clinical Performance Examinations, internal medicine examinations, and high perceptions of direct observation of clinical skills.Advantages for the academic medical center include mitigating the resources required to run a longitudinal integrated clerkship while providing primary care training and addressing core competencies such as systems-based practice, practice-based learning, and interprofessional care. Advantages for the community health system include faculty development, academic appointments, professional satisfaction, and recruitment.Success factors include continued support and investment from both organizations' leadership, high-quality faculty development, incentives for community-based physician educators, and emphasis on the mutually beneficial relationship for both organizations. Development of a longitudinal integrated clerkship in a community health system can serve as a model for developing and expanding these clerkship options for academic medical centers.

Impact of duty-hour restriction on resident inpatient teaching.

BACKGROUND: Education and patient care are essential to academic hospitalists, and residents are key partners in these goals. The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) duty-hour restrictions (DHR) likely impacted aspects of resident teaching, well-being, and patient care practices that affect the duties of academic hospitalists. OBJECTIVE: To determine the impact of DHR on resident teaching time and the factors associated with, and impacts of, time spent teaching. DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey. SETTING AND MEASUREMENTS: A total of 164 internal medicine residents at University of California, San Francisco (UCSF), San Francisco, CA were queried regarding their time spent teaching, completion of administrative tasks, number of hours worked, frequency of emotional exhaustion, and satisfaction with quality of patient care provided after DHR. Regression analyses identified factors associated with decreased teaching time and determined that there were associations between time spent teaching, emotional exhaustion, and satisfaction with quality of patient care. RESULTS: A total of 125 residents (76%) responded; 24% reported spending less time teaching. Less time teaching was associated with being a postgraduate year (PGY)-2 (odds ratio [OR], 7.14; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.56-32.79) or PGY-3 (OR, 8.23; 95% CI, 1.44-47.09), reporting working <80 hours/week (OR, 5.99; 95% CI, 1.11-32.48) and spending a greater percentage of time on administrative tasks (OR, 1.03; 95% CI, 1.00-1.06). Those residents who spent less time teaching also reported less frequent emotional exhaustion (P = 0.003) and more satisfaction with quality of care (P = 0.006). CONCLUSIONS: DHR has decreased teaching time for some residents, and those residents are more likely to be less emotionally exhausted and deliver self-perceived higher quality of care. Academic hospitalists should consider these impacts of DHR and make adjustments such as educational and work-life innovations to account for these shifts.