Medical Marijuana Legalization in Oklahoma: Effects on Neonatal Exposure to Opiates.

OBJECTIVE: The U.S. opioid epidemic has been characterized by increases in opioid misuse, overdose deaths, and neonatal opioid withdrawal syndrome. Research suggests that marijuana legalization has contributed to decreased use of opiates, although many studies had methodological weaknesses and failed to address the pregnant population. Implementation of medical cannabis laws has the potential to reduce maternal opioid use and, therefore, neonatal exposure to the drugs. This study aimed to examine the association between Oklahoma's implementation of state medical marijuana laws and the neonatal exposure to opioids. STUDY DESIGN: Electronic medical records at two sites (Oklahoma City and Lawton) were searched for results of cord, urine, and meconium screens to detect amphetamines, barbiturates, benzodiazepines, cocaine, ethanol, opiates, phencyclidine, and tetrahydrocannabinol (THC). Two study periods were compared: 19 months before Oklahoma's medical marijuana law took effect and 19 months after legalization began. RESULTS: A total of 16,804 babies were born alive at the two sites during the study period. The rate of positive THC tests per 1,000 liveborn infants significantly increased from 16.2 per 1,000 during the prelaw period to 22.2 per 1,000 during the postlaw period (p = 0.004). Neonatal opioid exposure incidence showed a nonsignificant decrease from 7.6 positive tests per 1,000 liveborn infants to 6.8 per 1,000 from prelaw to postlaw period (p = 0.542). The number of positive tests for THC and concomitant use of opioids doubled from the prelaw period (n = 4) to postlaw (n = 9), but there were too few cases for statistical significance. Infants at the more rural site had significantly higher rates for amphetamines, benzodiazepines, and THC, with a trend toward higher rates for opiates. CONCLUSION: Marijuana legalization was related to significant increases in positive test rates for THC, but no significant change/association was noted for neonatal exposure to opioids. KEY POINTS: · Prior studies have not examined neonatal exposure to opioids following marijuana legalization.. · Oklahoma's new law led to higher neonatal marijuana exposure.. · Legalization of medical marijuana did not change Oklahoma's neonatal opioid positivity rate..

Laryngeal Mask Use in the Neonatal Population: A Survey of Practice Providers at a Regional Tertiary Care Center in the United States.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the level of training, awareness, experience, and confidence of neonatal practice providers in the use of laryngeal mask (LM), and to identify the barriers in its implementation in the neonatal population. STUDY DESIGN: Descriptive observational study utilizing an anonymous online questionnaire among healthcare providers at the Oklahoma Children's Hospital who routinely respond to newborn deliveries and have been trained in the Neonatal Resuscitation Program (NRP). Participants included physicians, trainees, nurse practitioners, nurses, and respiratory therapists. RESULTS: Ninety-five participants completed the survey (27.5% response rate). The sample consisted of 77 NRP providers (81%), 11 instructors (12%), and 7 instructor mentors (7%). Among 72 respondents who had undergone LM training, 51 (54%) had hands-on manikin practice, 4 (4%) watched the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) NRP educational video, and 17 (18%) did both. Nurses (39 out of 46) were more likely to have completed LM training than were physicians (31 out of 47). With only 11 (12%) participants having ever placed a LM in a newly born infant, the median confidence for LM placement during neonatal resuscitation was 37 on a 0 to 100 scale. Frequently reported barriers for LM use in neonates were limited experience (81%), insufficient training (59%), preference for endotracheal tube (57%), and lack of awareness (56%). CONCLUSION: While the majority of the neonatal practice providers were trained in LM placement, only a few had ever placed one in a live newborn, with a low degree of confidence overall. Future practice improvement should incorporate ongoing interdisciplinary LM education, availability of LM in the labor and delivery units, and promotion of awareness of LM as an alternative airway. KEY POINTS: · LM is underutilized as an alternative airway.. · Insufficient experience and training limit LM use.. · Providers confidence with LM placement is low..

Provider Perspectives on the Acceptability, Appropriateness, and Feasibility of Teleneonatology.

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to measure provider perspectives on the acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility of teleneonatology in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) and community hospitals. STUDY DESIGN: Providers from five academic tertiary NICUs and 27 community hospitals were surveyed using validated implementation measures to assess the acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility of teleneonatology. For each of the 12 statements, scale values ranged from 1 to 5 (1 = strongly disagree; 5 = strongly agree), with higher scores indicating greater positive perceptions. Survey results were summarized, and differences across respondents assessed using generalized linear models. RESULTS: The survey response rate was 56% (203/365). Respondents found teleneonatology to be acceptable, appropriate, and feasible. The percent of respondents who agreed with each of the twelve statements ranged from 88.6 to 99.0%, with mean scores of 4.4 to 4.7 and median scores of 4.0 to 5.0. There was no difference in the acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility of teleneonatology when analyzed by professional role, years of experience in neonatal care, or years of teleneonatology experience. Respondents from Level I well newborn nurseries had greater positive perceptions of teleneonatology than those from Level II special care nurseries. CONCLUSION: Providers in tertiary NICUs and community hospitals perceive teleneonatology to be highly acceptable, appropriate, and feasible for their practices. The wide acceptance by providers of all roles and levels of experience likely demonstrates a broad receptiveness to telemedicine as a tool to deliver neonatal care, particularly in rural communities where specialists are unavailable. KEY POINTS: · Neonatal care providers perceive teleneonatology to be highly acceptable, appropriate, and feasible.. · Perceptions of teleneonatology do not differ based on professional role or years of experience.. · Perceptions of teleneonatology are especially high in smaller hospitals with well newborn nurseries..

Accuracy of Simulated Research Tasks by Community Hospitals Participating in a Multicenter Telemedicine Trial.

Background/Aims: Clinical trials evaluating facility-to-facility telemedicine may include sites that have limited research experience. For the trial to be successful, these sites must correctly perform research-related tasks. This study aimed to determine whether health care professionals at community hospitals could accurately identify simulated study eligible patients and submit data to a research coordinating center. Methods: Twenty-seven community hospitals in the United States and Canada participated in this study. An electronic survey was sent to one designated health care professional at each site. The survey included a description of trial eligibility criteria and five written neonatal resuscitation scenarios. For each scenario, the participant determined whether the neonate was study eligible. One scenario required participants to submit 14 data elements to the coordinating center. Accuracy of study eligibility and data submission was summarized using standard descriptive statistics. Results: The survey response rate was 100% (27/27). Overall accuracy in determining study eligibility was 89% (120/135), and accuracy varied across the five scenarios (range 82-93%). Overall accuracy of data submission was 92% (310/336). Data were >95% accurate for 9 of the 14 data elements, with 100% accuracy achieved for 6 data elements. These results were used to clarify eligibility criteria, inform database design, and improve training materials for the subsequent clinical trial. Conclusions: Health care professionals at community hospitals accurately determined trial eligibility and submitted study data based on written clinical scenarios. Research teams conducting telemedicine trials with community hospitals should consider completing pre-trial simulation activities to identify opportunities for improving trial processes and materials.

Tele-Echocardiography for Congenital Heart Disease Screening in a Level II Neonatal Intensive Care Unit with Hybrid Telemedicine System.

Introduction: The nationwide shortage of pediatric cardiologists in medically underserved areas poses a challenge to congenital heart disease (CHD) screening requiring echocardiography, resulting in transfer of neonates to regional Level III/IV Neonatal Intensive Care Units (NICUs). This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy, safety, and cost-effectiveness of tele-echocardiography for advanced CHD screening at a Level II NICU managed by a hybrid telemedicine system. Methods: Retrospective chart review of infants requiring tele-echocardiography at a Level II NICU. Patient demographics, echocardiography indications, and findings were analyzed. Agreement between tele-echocardiography and conventional echocardiography findings was assessed. Transport cost savings were calculated based on preventable transfers to Level IV NICU. Descriptive statistics were computed for demographic and clinical variables. Results: Over 5 years, 52 infants were screened for CHD. Thirty-two infants (62%) had findings consistent with minor CHD or normal neonatal transitional physiology. Twenty infants (38%) had abnormal findings requiring follow-up with either a conventional echocardiography as inpatient at the regional Level IV NICU or as outpatient after discharge. Only 5 infants (10%) required transfer to a Level IV NICU for CHD management, whereas 15 infants (29%) were scheduled for outpatient follow-up. Strong agreement was noted between tele-echocardiography and conventional echocardiography findings. No case of critical congenital heart disease (CCHD) was missed. Tele-echocardiography saved $260,000 in transport costs. Conclusions: Tele-echocardiography can be accurate, safe, and effective in CHD screening, preventing unnecessary transfer of most infants to regional Level III/IV NICUs, saving transfer costs.

Evaluation of Neonatal Services Provided in a Level II NICU Utilizing Hybrid Telemedicine: A Prospective Study.

Objective: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of premature infant treatment managed by hybrid telemedicine versus conventional care. Methods: Prospective, noninferiority study comparing outcomes of premature infants at Comanche County Memorial Hospital's (CCMH) Level II neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) with outcomes at OU Medical Center's (OUMC) Level IV NICU. All 32-35 weeks gestational age (GA) infants admitted between May 2015 and October 2017 were included. Infants requiring mechanical ventilation >24 h or advanced subspecialty care were excluded. Outcome variables were: length of stay (LOS), respiratory support, and time to full per oral (PO) feeds. Parents at both centers were surveyed about their satisfaction with the care provided. Between-group comparisons were performed by using Chi-square or Fisher's exact test. LOS was assessed for normality by using the Shapiro-Wilk test, and robust regression was used to construct a multivariable regression model to test the independent effect of location on LOS. All analyses were performed by using SAS v. 9.3 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC). Results: Data from 85 CCMH and 70 OUMC neonates were analyzed. CCMH neonates had significantly shorter LOS, reached full PO feeds sooner, and had fewer noninvasive ventilation support days. Location had a significant independent effect (p = 0.001) on LOS while controlling for GA, gender, race, surfactant use, inborn/outborn status, and 5-min APGAR scores. CCMH patients had reduced LOS of 3.01 days (95% confidence interval 1.1-4.8) than OUMC patients. Eighty-five surveys at CCMH and 66 at OUMC were analyzed. Compared with CCMH, OUMC parents reported more travel distance difficulties. 92.5% reported telemedicine experience as good or excellent, whereas 1.5% reported it as poor. Conclusion(s): Hybrid telemedicine is a safe and effective way to extend intensive neonatal care to medically underserved areas. Parental satisfaction with use of hybrid telemedicine is high and comparable to conventional care.

A Hybrid Form of Telemedicine: A Unique Way to Extend Intensive Care Service to Neonates in Medically Underserved Areas.

BACKGROUND: More than 90% of neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) in the United States are in urban areas, denying rural residents' easy NICU access. Telemedicine use for patient contact and management, although studied in adults and children, is understudied in neonates. A hybrid telemedicine system, with 24/7 neonatal nurse practitioner coverage and with a neonatologist physically present 3 days per week and telemedicine coverage the remaining days, was recently implemented at Comanche County Memorial Hospital's (CCMH) Level II NICU. OBJECTIVE: To compare outcomes of moderately ill infants between 32-35 weeks gestational age (GA) managed by our hybrid telemedicine program with outcomes of similar neonates receiving standard care in a Level IV NICU at Oklahoma University Medical Center (OUMC). DESIGN/METHODS: This was a retrospective, noninferiority study comparing outcomes of neonates receiving hybrid telemedicine versus standard care. All 32-35 weeks GA infants admitted between July 2013 and June 2015 were included. OUMC infants came from areas geographically comparable with CCMH. Infants requiring prolonged mechanical ventilation or advanced subspecialty services were excluded. Outcome variables were length of stay, type and duration of respiratory support, length of antibiotic therapy, and time to full enteral feedings. RESULTS: Eighty-seven neonates at CCMH and 56 neonates at OUMC were included in the analysis. Compared with neonates at OUMC, neonates at CCMH had shorter hospitalizations, fewer days of supplemental oxygen, and fewer noninvasive ventilation support days, and reached full enteral feeds sooner. CONCLUSIONS: The hybrid telemedicine system is a safe and effective strategy for extending intensive care to neonates in medically underserved areas.

Evaluating Patients' and Neonatologists' Satisfaction With the Use of Telemedicine for Neonatology Prenatal Consultations During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Background: During the COVID-19 pandemic, telemedicine plays a critical role in providing safe, effective healthcare services, while reinforcing social distancing and optimizing the use of personal protective equipment. In this context, the Oklahoma Children's Hospital implemented virtual neonatology prenatal visits for pregnant women with a diagnosis of fetal anomalies. While tele-consultations have been broadly used with a high degree of acceptance in rural and remote areas, satisfaction has not been assessed in this particular scenario, where patients and physicians discussing sensitive healthcare information had to rapidly adjust to this new modality. Objectives: To evaluate patients' and neonatologists' satisfaction with virtual prenatal consultations in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic and to compare satisfaction levels of patients receiving virtual consultation with those receiving in-person consults. Methods: This cross-sectional study evaluated patients' and neonatologists' satisfaction with virtual consultations. Participants included pregnant women with diagnosis of fetal anomalies who received neonatology prenatal consultations at Oklahoma Children's Hospital, either in-person or through telemedicine, from May to mid-November 2020, and neonatologists providing virtual prenatal consultations in the same period. Virtual visits were delivered via Zoom Pro™. Patients and physicians who agreed to participate rated acceptability completing an anonymous 5-point Likert scale survey. Item frequencies and means for categories of items were computed by group (video-consult patients, in-person patients, physicians) and analyzed, using Welch's t for unequal sample size. Results: Overall consultation quality was rated good or excellent by 35 (100%) video-consult patients and 12 (100%) in-person patients. Patient group means computed on six 5-point Likert items about patient-physician communication did not differ significantly, video-consult: M = 28.71 (2.22); in-person consult: M = 28.92 (1.78) (p = 0.753263). All eight physicians (100%) agreed or strongly agreed that telemedicine was effective, using a 5-point Likert scale, and their combined consultation quality score computed on 10 survey questions was high: M = 46.4 (3.11). Conclusion: Despite patient inexperience with tele-consultations, the quick implementation of telemedicine, and the sensitive reason for the visit, patients and physicians were highly satisfied with virtual visits. Telemedicine is a safe, effective alternative for providing neonatology prenatal consultations for pregnant women with diagnosis of fetal anomalies during the pandemic.