NIPU: a randomised, open-label, phase II study evaluating nivolumab and ipilimumab combined with UV1 vaccination as second line treatment in patients with malignant mesothelioma.

BACKGROUND: Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is a rare and aggressive tumour. For patients with inoperable disease, few treatment options are available after first line chemotherapy. The combination of ipilimumab and nivolumab has recently shown increased survival compared to standard chemotherapy, but most patients do not respond and improvements are called for. Telomerase is expressed in mesothelioma cells, but only sparsely in normal tissues and is therefore an attractive target for therapeutic vaccination. Vaccination against telomerase is tolerable and has shown to induce immune responses associated with increased survival in other cancer types. There is a well-founded scientific rationale for the combination of a telomerase vaccine and checkpoint inhibition to improve treatment response in MPM patients. METHODS: NIPU is a randomized, multi-centre, open-label, phase II study comparing the efficacy and safety of nivolumab and ipilimumab with or without telomerase vaccine in patients with inoperable malignant pleural mesothelioma after first-line platinum-based chemotherapy. Participants (n = 118) are randomized 1:1 into two treatment arms. All participants receive treatment with nivolumab (240 mg every 2 weeks) and ipilimumab (1 mg/kg every 6 weeks) until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity or for a maximum of 2 years. Patients randomised to the experimental arm receive 8 intradermal injections of UV1 vaccine during the first three months of treatment. Tumour tissue, blood, urine, faeces and imaging will be collected for biomarker analyses and exploration of mechanisms for response and resistance to therapy. DISCUSSION: Checkpoint inhibition is used for treatment of mesothelioma, but many patients still do not respond. Increasing therapy response to immunotherapy is an important goal. Possible approaches include combination with chemotherapy, radiotherapy, targeted therapy and other immunotherapeutic agents. Predictive biomarkers are necessary to ensure optimal treatment for each patient and to prevent unnecessary side effects. This trial seeks to improve treatment response by combining checkpoint inhibition with a telomerase vaccine and also to explore mechanisms for treatment response and resistance. Knowledge gained in the NIPU study may be transferred to the first line setting and to other cancers with limited benefit from immunotherapy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04300244, registered March 8th, 2020, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04300244?term=NIPU&draw=2&rank=1 .

Epigenetic predictive biomarkers for response or outcome to platinum-based chemotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer, current state-of-art.

Platinum-based chemotherapy is commonly used to treat non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, its efficacy is limited and no molecular biomarkers that predict response are available. In this review, we summarize current knowledge concerning potential epigenetic predictive markers for platinum-based chemotherapy response in NSCLC. A systematic search of PubMed and ClinicalTrials.gov using keywords "non-small cell lung cancer" combined with "chemotherapy predictive biomarkers", "chemotherapy epigenetics biomarkers", "chemotherapy microRNA biomarkers", "chemotherapy DNA methylation" and "chemotherapy miRNA biomarkers" revealed 1740 articles from PubMed and 36 clinical trials. Finally, 22 papers and no trials fulfilled the review criteria. Among miRNA, combination of miR-1290, miR-196b and miR-135a in tumor tissue, and miR-21, miR-25, miR27b, and miR-326 in plasma were predictive for response to platinum-based chemotherapy in advanced NSCLC. RASSF1A methylation measured in tumor or blood was predictive for response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. These biomarkers remain experimental and none have been tested in a prospective trial.

High-dose thoracic radiation therapy for non-small cell lung cancer: a novel grading scale of radiation-induced lung injury for symptomatic radiation pneumonitis.

BACKGROUND: Symptomatic radiation pneumonitis (RP) may be a serious complication after thoracic radiation therapy (RT) for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This prospective observational study sought to evaluate the utility of a novel radiation-induced lung injury (RILI) grading scale (RGS) for the prediction of RP. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data of 41 patients with NSCLC treated with thoracic RT of 60-66 Gy were analysed. CT scans were scheduled before RT, one month post-RT, and every three months thereafter for one year. Symptomatic RP was defined as Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events grade ≥ 2. RGS grading ranged from 0 to 3. The inter-observer variability of the RGS was assessed by four senior radiologists. CT scans performed 28 ± 10 days after RT were used to analyse the predictive value of the RGS. The change in the RGS severity was correlated to dosimetric parameters. RESULTS: The CT obtained one month post-RT showed RILI in 36 (88%) of patients (RGS grade 0 [5 patients], 1 [25 patients], 2 [6 patients], and 3 [5 patients]). The inter-observer agreement of the RGS grading was high (Kendall's W coefficient of concordance = 0.80, p < 0.01). Patients with RGS grades 2-3 had a significantly higher risk for development of RP (relative risk (RR): 2.4, 95% CI 1.6-3.7, p < 0.01) and RP symptoms within 8 weeks after RT (RR: 4.8, 95% CI 1.3-17.6, p < 0.01) compared to RGS grades 0-1. The specificity and sensitivity of the RGS grades 2-3 in predicting symptomatic RP was 100% (95% CI 80.5-100%) and 45.4% (95% CI 24.4-67.8%), respectively. Increase in RGS severity correlated to mean lung dose and the percentage of the total lung volume receiving 5 Gy. CONCLUSIONS: The RGS is a simple radiologic tool associated with symptomatic RP. A validation study is warranted.

Prospectively scored pulmonary toxicities in non-small cell lung cancer: Results from a randomized phase II dose escalation trial.

PURPOSE: Prospectively scored radiation pneumonitis (RP) observed in a national, randomized phase II dose-escalation trial for patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) was investigated. METHODS: Patients with stage IIB-IIIB histologically proven NSCLC were treated with concomitant chemo-radiotherapy (oral Vinorelbine 3times/week) at 60 Gy/30fx (A-59pts) and 66 Gy/33fx (B-58pts) from 2009 to 2013 at five Danish RT centers. Grade 2 RP (CTCAEv3.0) was investigated with univariate analysis for association with clinical and dosimetric parameters, including dyspnea and cough at baseline and during RT. Multivariable logistic regression and Cox regression with regularization were used to find a multivariable model for RP ≥ G2. RESULTS: Despite a tendency of higher mean lung dose in the high-dose arm (median[range] A = 14.9 Gy[5.8,23.1], B = 17.5 Gy[8.6,24.8], p = 0.075), pulmonary toxicities were not significantly different (RP ≥ G2 41%(A) and 52%(B), p = 0.231). A Kaplan Meier analysis of the time to RP ≥ G2 between the two arms did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.180). Statistically significant risk factors for RP ≥ G2 were GTV size (OR = 2.091/100 cm3, p = 0.002), infection at baseline or during RT (OR = 8.087, p = 0.026), dyspnea at baseline (OR = 2.184, p = 0.044) and increase of cough during RT (OR = 2.787, p = 0.008). In the multivariable logistic regression and the Cox regression analysis, the deviances of the most predictive models were within one standard deviation of the null model. CONCLUSION: No statistical difference between the high- and low dose arm was found in the risk of developing RP. The univariate analysis identified target volume, infection, dyspnea at baseline, and increase of cough during RT as risk factors for RP. The number of patients was too small to establish a statistically sound multivariable model.

Genomic Profiling of Circulating Tumor DNA Predicts Outcome and Demonstrates Tumor Evolution in ALK-Positive Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients.

With the rapid development of targeted therapies for the treatment of cancer, methods for predicting response and outcome are in high demand. Non-small cell lung cancer driven by genomic rearrangements of the anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) gene can be successfully treated with ALK-targeted therapy. Unfortunately, a subset of patients does not respond, and all patients ultimately acquire resistance, highlighting the need for better clinical tools to manage these patients. Here, we performed targeted next-generation sequencing on plasma circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) from 24 patients to assess the clinical utility of ctDNA genomic profiling. Patients with detectable ctDNA prior to treatment had worse progression-free survival (PFS) than those without (median 8.7 vs. 15.2 months, p = 0.028). In addition, the presence of ctDNA within two months after treatment initiation predicted inferior PFS (median 4.6 vs. 14.5 months, p = 0.028). Longitudinal monitoring of ctDNA with droplet digital PCR during treatment reflected the radiological response and revealed potential acquired resistance mutations. Interestingly, an increase in the ctDNA concentration was evident prior to the determination of progressive disease by conventional radiological imaging, with a median lead time of 69 days (range 30-113). Genomic profiling of ctDNA is a promising tool for predicting outcome and monitoring response to targeted therapy.

Clearing of circulating tumour DNA predicts clinical response to first line tyrosine kinase inhibitors in advanced epidermal growth factor receptor mutated non-small cell lung cancer.

OBJECTIVES: Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations confer sensitivity to tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, a subset of patients has limited or no response. We investigated the initial dynamics of EGFR mutations detected in circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) during treatment as a predictive marker of outcome. METHODS: A total of 225 patients with advanced EGFR mutated NSCLC were included for consecutive blood sampling in this prospective multicentre study. Out of these, 146 patients received first line TKI and had a baseline blood sample available for EGFR mutation testing with the Cobas® EGFR mutation test V2. For examinations on clearing and clinical outcome, 98 patients who had detectable ctDNA at baseline and at least one follow-up blood sample were included. RESULTS: For patients with EGFR mutations present in plasma at baseline, clearing of mutations from the blood during first line TKI served as a positive predictor for objective response rate (p = 0.0008), progression-free survival (PFS) (p < 0.0001) and overall survival (OS) (p < 0.0001). This was seen both for patients who cleared the ctDNA within the first 7 weeks of treatment and patients who cleared the ctDNA at a slower pace. Baseline mutation presence was a negative predictor for PFS (p = 0.0069) and OS (p = 0.0340). CONCLUSION: The current study is the first to confirm, in a sizeable Caucasian cohort, that clearing of EGFR mutations predict outcome to first line TKI in patients with EGFR mutated NSCLC.

Clearing of circulating tumour DNA predicts clinical response to osimertinib in EGFR mutated lung cancer patients.

OBJECTIVES: Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are first line treatment choices for patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, responses vary among patients, therefore good biomarkers predicting better responses are required. EGFR mutations are detected in the blood from patients as circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA). Studies have shown that clearing ctDNA during first line TKI treatment predicts outcomes for first and second generation TKI treatments. We aimed to investigate the effects on outcome measures of ctDNA clearing in subsequent treatment lines to treatment with the third generation TKI osimertinib. METHODS: In total, 225 patients were included in a prospective, multicentre study, where consecutive blood samples were monitored for EGFR mutations during systemic treatment lines, using the Cobas® EGFR mutation test v2. This study focused on EGFR mutations in ctDNA of 82 systemically pre-treated patients receiving osimertinib. RESULTS: Clearing all EGFR mutations from the blood after osimertinib treatment, significantly predicted progression-free survival, objective response rates and disease control rates. Primary sensitising EGFR mutations were found in ctDNA in 70 % of patients, and were accompanied by the T790 M mutation in nearly two thirds of cases. The T790 M mutation was cleared in all cases, while the accompanying sensitising mutations did not necessarily clear. However, T790 M clearing without simultaneously clearing of the primary sensitising mutation did not predict clinical responses. Neither the detection of T790 M before osimertinib treatment, nor the presence of EGFR mutations at the time of osimertinib initiation predicted clinical outcomes. CONCLUSION: The clearing of EGFR mutations in ctDNA after osimertinib treatment initiation in patients with advanced NSCLC is useful as a positive predictor of clinical outcome.

A randomized phase II trial of concurrent chemoradiation with two doses of radiotherapy, 60Gy and 66Gy, concomitant with a fixed dose of oral vinorelbine in locally advanced NSCLC.

INTRODUCTION: In order to test the best performing radiation dose with a convenient chemotherapy schedule of an oral formulation of radio-sensitizing vinorelbine in inoperable locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), we performed a randomized phase II trial based on a "pick the winner" design. METHODS: After 2 cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, 117 patients with NSCLC stage IIB-IIIB in performance status 0-1 were randomized to radiotherapy 60Gy/30 fractions or 66Gy/33 fractions concurrent with a fixed dose of oral vinorelbine 50mg administered 3 times weekly. The primary endpoint was local progression free interval. A scheduled FDG-PET-CT-scan was performed 9months after randomization. The study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT 00887783). RESULTS: Both arms were well tolerated. The local progression free interval at 9months was 54% in the 60Gy arm and 59% in the 66Gy arm (log rank test p=0.55). There was no statistically significant difference in overall survival. The median survival was 23.3 and 23.7months in the 60 and 66Gy arm, respectively. No significant difference in toxicity was observed. CONCLUSION: Both 60 and 66Gy administered concomitant with oral vinorelbine showed similar local control and overall survival, and was well tolerated. The pick the winner design choose 66Gy as the winning arm.

Acute esophagitis for patients with local-regional advanced non small cell lung cancer treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy.

PURPOSE: Esophagitis is common in patients treated with definitive radiotherapy for local-regional advanced non small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The purpose of this study was to estimate the dose-effect relationship using clinical and dosimetric parameters in patients receiving intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and concomitant chemotherapy (CCT). METHODS: Between 2009 and 2013, 117 patients with stages IIB-IIIB NSCLC were treated in a multicenter randomized phase II trial with 2 cycles of induction chemotherapy followed by IMRT and CCT. The esophagitis was prospectively scored using the Common Toxicity Criteria 3.0. Clinical and dosimetric variables were analyzed for the correlation with grade ⩾2 esophagitis through logistic regression. RESULTS: Grade 2 esophagitis was experienced by 31 (27%). All models including gender, institution, a dosimetric parameter and a position parameter were significantly associated with esophagitis. The two models using the relative esophagus volume irradiated above 40 Gy (V40, OR=2.18/10% volume) or the length of esophagus irradiated above 40 Gy (L40, OR=4.03/5 cm) were optimal. The upper part of esophagus was more sensitive and females experienced more toxicity than men. CONCLUSION: V40 and L40 were most effective dosimetric predictors of grade ⩾2 esophagitis. The upper part of esophagus was more sensitive.

Effective ultra-low doses of erlotinib in patients with EGFR sensitising mutation.

We describe three cases of patients with advanced adenocarcinoma of the lung and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation treated with erlotinib 25 mg/day and 25 mg every second day, being equal to one-sixth and one-twelfth of the recommended dose. The mean age of our patients was above 70 with a WHO performance status 1 before and during the treatment. The reasons for erlotinib dose reduction were rash, diarrhoea and fatigue. The decision was a result of lack of other treatment options and radiological response on standard doses. We did not observe any liver enzyme abnormalities. However, the post-treatment creatinine increased significantly. As of February 2014, our patients are still on treatment with tolerable side effects and improved quality of life. These findings indicate that some patients responding to erlotinib with noxious side effects could have clinical benefit in doses much lower than recommended.

EGFR mutation frequency and effectiveness of erlotinib: a prospective observational study in Danish patients with non-small cell lung cancer.

OBJECTIVES: In 2008, we initiated a prospective study to explore the frequency and predictive value of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations in an unselected population of Danish patients with non-small cell lung cancer offered treatment with erlotinib, mainly in second-line. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Four hundred and eighty eight patients with advanced NSCLC were included. The mutation status was assessed using the cobas EGFR Mutation Test. Erlotinib was administrated (150 mg/d) until disease progression or unacceptable toxicities occurred. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival. Secondary endpoints were overall survival and response. RESULTS: Biopsies were retrieved from 467 patients, and mutation results obtained for 462. We identified 57 (12%) patients with EGFR mutations: 33 exon 19 deletions, 13 exon 21 mutations, 5 exon 18 mutations, 3 exon 20 insertions, 1 exon 20 point mutation (S768I), and two complex mutations. Seven percent of the patients were never smokers. The differences in median progression-free survival and overall survival between the mutated group and the wild-type group were 8.0 vs. 2.5 months, p<0.001 and 12.1 vs. 3.9 months, p<0.001. Performance status (0-1 vs. 2-3) and line of treatment (1st vs. 2nd and 3rd) had no influence on outcome in EGFR-mutated patients. CONCLUSION: We found a higher frequency of EGFR mutations than expected in a cohort with less than 10% never smokers. The outcome after treatment with erlotinib was much better in patients with EGFR mutations than in patients with wild-type EGFR and was independent of performance status and treatment line in EGFR-mutated patients.

A phase II study using vinorelbine and continuous 5-fluorouracil in patients with advanced head and neck cancer.

Seventy patients with advanced head and neck cancer were treated with vinorelbine and continuous 5-FU administered in a central venous catheter. Over all response was 36% with 9% complete responses. The most common grade 3 and 4 toxicities were stomatitis (13), infection (5), pain related to vinorelbine infusion (4), skin toxicity (3). Thirty one patients had grade 3 or 4 leukopenia. Treatment was complicated by venous thrombosis in the central venous catheter in one case. A majority of patients experienced dose reduction of one or both drugs or treatment delays due to toxicity. Median time to progression was 4.7 months and overall median survival 6.6 months. We conclude that the regimen is feasible and tolerated with moderate toxicity. Response rates and time to progression are comparable to other studies with multi agent treatment.