RESUMEN
There is growing interest in cannabis use for cancer pain. This commentary aims to discuss the evidence surrounding cannabis use for cancer pain in the context of the long-racialized landscape of cannabis policies and the disparity in pain control among cancer patients holding minoritized racial identities. Much evidence surrounding both the benefits and harms of cannabis use in cancer patients, and all patients in general, is lacking. Although drawing on the research in cancer that is available, it is also important to illustrate the broader context about how cannabis' deep roots in medical, political, and social history impact patient use and health care policies. There are lessons we can learn from the racialized disparities in opioid risk mitigation strategies, so they are not replicated in the settings of cannabis for cancer symptom management. Additionally, the authors intentionally use the term "cannabis" here rather than "marijuana.: In the early 1900s, the lay press and government popularized the use of the word "marijuana" instead of the more common "cannabis" to tie the drug to anti-Mexican prejudice.
Asunto(s)
Dolor en Cáncer , Cannabis , Dolor Crónico , Marihuana Medicinal , Neoplasias , Humanos , Dolor en Cáncer/tratamiento farmacológico , Marihuana Medicinal/uso terapéutico , Dolor/tratamiento farmacológico , Dolor/inducido químicamente , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias/complicaciones , Neoplasias/epidemiología , Neoplasias/terapiaRESUMEN
Cancer survivors including Asian American breast cancer survivors have reported their high needs for help during their survivorship process. With the COVID-19 pandemic, the necessity of technology-based programs to address their needs for help without face-to-face interactions has been highlighted. The purpose of this randomized intervention study was to determine the efficacy of a technology-based program in reducing various types of needs for help among this specific population. This was a randomized clinical trial with repeated measures. A total of 199 participants were included in the data analysis. The recruitment settings included both online and offline communities/groups for Asian Americans. The needs for help were assessed using the Support Care Needs Survey-34 Short Form (SCNS) subscales measuring psychological, information, physical, support, and communication needs. Data analysis was conducted through an intent-to-treat approach. In the mixed effect models, psychological needs, information needs, physical needs, and communication needs decreased over time (P < .001). However, there were no significant group * time effects. Social support significantly mediated the effects of a technology-based intervention on psychological, information, and support needs at the pre-test and the post-1 month. This study supported significant decreases in the needs for help of Asian American breast cancer survivors by a technology-based intervention. Further studies are needed with other racial/ethnic groups of cancer survivors to confirm the efficacy of a technology-based intervention in reducing cancer survivors' needs for help during their survivorship process.
Asunto(s)
Asiático , Neoplasias de la Mama , COVID-19 , Supervivientes de Cáncer , Apoyo Social , Humanos , Femenino , Neoplasias de la Mama/etnología , Neoplasias de la Mama/psicología , Neoplasias de la Mama/terapia , Supervivientes de Cáncer/psicología , Asiático/psicología , Persona de Mediana Edad , COVID-19/prevención & control , COVID-19/epidemiología , Evaluación de Necesidades , Adulto , SARS-CoV-2 , Necesidades y Demandas de Servicios de Salud , Anciano , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Military persons frequently experience pain conditions stemming from noncombat and combat injuries. This study assessed the patterns of change over time and the associations of pain intensity and interference with physical, mental, and social health domains in a military sample. METHODS: A secondary analysis of Pain Assessment Screening Tool and Outcomes Registry (PASTOR) was conducted using data collected over 10 months. Participants selected for analysis completed ≥3 assessments with an interval of ≥14 days between assessments. The Defense and Veterans Pain Rating Scale (DVPRS) measured average and worst pain intensity, and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS®) T-scores measured pain and health outcomes. RESULTS: The sample (N = 190) majority reported being active duty (96%); serving in the U.S. Army (93%); and being enlisted (86%). The percent difference from assessment one to assessment three showed improvement for DVPRS average pain (-4.85%) and worst pain (-2.16%), and PROMIS Pain Interference T-score (-1.98%). Improvements were observed for all PROMIS outcomes except depression. The Defense and Veterans Pain Rating Scale average and worst pain intensity and PROMIS pain interference were strongly correlated with physical function. Multilevel models showed that an increase in average and worst pain, and pain interference were associated with a decrease in satisfaction with social roles. CONCLUSION: Analysis identified patterns of change over time in physical, mental, and social health outcomes, as well as associations important to understanding the complexities of pain. This work has implications for pain management nursing in ambulatory settings where ongoing collection and analyses of multivariable outcomes data can inform clinical care.
Asunto(s)
Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud , Dolor , Humanos , Dimensión del DolorRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Miscommunication between parents and healthcare providers in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU) can affect family-provider relationships and outcomes. This paper reports on the development and psychometric testing of a measure for parent perceived miscommunication, defined as the failure to communicate clearly as perceived by relevant stakeholders in the PICU. DESIGN AND METHODS: Miscommunication items were identified through a review of the literature with interdisciplinary experts. In a cross-sectional quantitative survey, the scale was tested with 200 parents of children discharged from a PICU at a large Northeastern Level 1 Pediatric hospital. The psychometric properties of a 6-item miscommunication measure were assessed using exploratory factor analysis and internal consistency reliability. RESULTS: Exploratory factor analysis yielded one factor explaining 66.09% of the variance. Internal consistency reliability in the PICU sample was α = 0.89. As hypothesized, there was a significant correlation between parental stress, trust, and perceived miscommunication in the PICU (p < .001). Confirmatory factor analysis supported good fit indices in testing the measurement model (χ2/df = 2.57, Goodness of Fit Index (GFI) = 0.979, Confirmatory Fit Index (CFI) =0.993 and Standardized Mean Residual (SMR) = 0.0136). CONCLUSIONS: This new six-item miscommunication measure shows promising psychometric properties including content and construct validity, which can be further tested and refined in future studies of miscommunication and outcomes in PICU. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Awareness of perceived miscommunication in the PICU can benefit stakeholders within the clinical environment by recognizing the importance of clear and effective communication and how language affects the parent-child-provider relationship.
Asunto(s)
Personal de Salud , Unidades de Cuidado Intensivo Pediátrico , Humanos , Niño , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Estudios Transversales , Análisis Factorial , Psicometría , Comunicación , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Pain is a common symptom in patients undergoing cancer treatment. Despite recommendations for the stronger integration of complementary and integrative health (CIH) in cancer pain management, little is known about the individual experience of using this approach for cancer pain, particularly in certain populations such as African Americans. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to describe the experiences of using CIH for pain in African American and White patients with cancer undergoing cancer treatments. METHODS: A secondary analysis of qualitative descriptive data from a subsample of patients with cancer in a parent study of their illness concerns was employed. Atlas.ti 8.0 was used for data management and qualitative analysis. Counts of participant-endorsed themes were tabulated to discern differences in themes by group. RESULTS: Of 32 participants (16 African American, 16 White), 22 reported CIH usage for cancer pain management, with equal distribution between groups (11 each). Three themes emerged: Approach to, Reasons for, and Barriers to CIH Use. Psychological approaches were most common (n = 15). Nutritional, physical, and combination approaches were less common and more often employed by White participants. Reasons for CIH use were to reduce opioid consumption or for an opioid adjuvant. Personal limitations and access issues contributed to Barriers to CIH use. CONCLUSIONS: Both African American and White patients used CIH for pain management while undergoing cancer treatments. However, some preferential differences in CIH approaches by race surfaced. Further research into these differences may uncover new ways of addressing disparities in cancer pain management with CIH.
Asunto(s)
Terapias Complementarias , Neoplasias , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Neoplasias/complicaciones , Neoplasias/terapia , Dolor/etiología , Manejo del Dolor , Investigación CualitativaRESUMEN
The purpose of this consensus paper was to convene leaders and scholars from eight Expert Panels of the American Academy of Nursing and provide recommendations to advance nursing's roles and responsibility to ensure universal access to palliative care. On behalf of the Academy, these evidence-based recommendations will guide nurses, policy makers, government representatives, professional associations, and interdisciplinary and community partners to integrate palliative nursing services across health and social care settings. Through improved palliative nursing education, nurse-led research, nurse engagement in policy making, enhanced intersectoral partnerships with nursing, and an increased profile and visibility of palliative care nurses worldwide, nurses can assume leading roles in delivering high-quality palliative care globally, particularly for minoritized, marginalized, and other at-risk populations. Part II herein provides a summary of international responses and policy options that have sought to enhance universal palliative care and palliative nursing access to date. Additionally, we provide ten policy, education, research, and clinical practice recommendations based on the rationale and background information found in Part I. The consensus paper's 43 authors represent eight countries (Australia, Canada, England, Kenya, Lebanon, Liberia, South Africa, United States of America) and extensive international health experience, thus providing a global context for the subject matter.
Asunto(s)
Consenso , Testimonio de Experto , Salud Global , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud , Enfermería de Cuidados Paliativos al Final de la Vida , Cuidados Paliativos/normas , Enfermería Basada en la Evidencia/tendencias , Política de Salud , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/normas , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/tendencias , Humanos , Sociedades de Enfermería , Participación de los Interesados , Atención de Salud UniversalRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Caring for patients with serious illness may severely strain clinicians causing distress and probable poor patient outcomes. Unfortunately, clinician distress and its impact historically has received little attention. RESEARCH PURPOSE: The purpose of this article was to investigate the nature of clinician distress. RESEARCH DESIGN: Qualitative inductive dimensional analysis. PARTICIPANTS AND RESEARCH CONTEXT: After review of 577 articles from health sciences databases, a total of 33 articles were eligible for analysis. ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS: This study did not require ethical review and the authors adhered to appropriate academic standards in their analysis. FINDINGS: A narrative of clinician distress in the hospital clinician in the United States emerged from the analysis. This included clinicians' perceptions and sense of should or the feeling that something is awry in the clinical situation. The explanatory matrix consequence of clinician distress occurred under conditions including: the recognition of conflict, the recognition of emotion, or the recognition of a mismatch; followed by a process of an inability to feel and act according to one's values due to a precipitating event. DISCUSSION: This study adds three unique contributions to the concept of clinician distress by (1) including the emotional aspects of caring for seriously ill patients, (2) providing a new framework for understanding clinician distress within the clinician's own perceptions, and (3) looking at action outside of a purely moral lens by dimensionalizing data, thereby pulling apart what has been socially constructed. CONCLUSION: For clinicians, learning to recognize one's perceptions and emotional reactions is the first step in mitigating distress. There is a critical need to understand the full scope of clinician distress and its impact on the quality of patient-centered care in serious illness.
Asunto(s)
Principios Morales , Atención al Paciente , Emociones , Humanos , Atención Dirigida al PacienteAsunto(s)
Metadona , Neoplasias , Tratamiento de Sustitución de Opiáceos , Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides , Humanos , Metadona/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias/terapia , Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides/tratamiento farmacológico , Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides/rehabilitaciónRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Approximately one in two cancer patients globally are under-treated for pain. Opioids and other analgesics represent the mainstay of cancer pain management; however, barriers to their use are well-documented. We evaluated whether acupuncture would be a preferable treatment option among cancer patients with attitudinal barriers to pharmacological pain management. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional survey of cancer patients at a tertiary urban cancer center and eleven suburban/rural hospitals in the Northeastern United States. We assessed attitudinal barriers to pharmacological pain management with the Barriers Questionnaire (BQ-13). The BQ-13 consists of two subscales: pain management beliefs and analgesic side effects. We also asked patients whether they prefer acupuncture, analgesics, or have no preference between these two modalities for pain management. Covariates included sociodemographics, clinical characteristics, and attitudes/beliefs about acupuncture. We used logistic regression to examine the association between attitudinal barriers and acupuncture preference. RESULTS: Among 628 patients, 197 (31.4%) preferred acupuncture for pain management, 146 (23.3%) preferred analgesics, and 285 (45.4%) had no preference. The highest reported attitudinal barriers were fear of addiction and fear of analgesic-associated constipation and nausea. Adjusting for covariates, we found that attitudinal barriers related to fear of analgesic side effects were significantly associated with acupuncture preference (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 1.45, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.17-1.81), but barriers related to pain management beliefs were not (AOR 1.17, 95% CI 0.91-1.51). Attitudes/beliefs about acupuncture (i.e., greater expected benefits, fewer perceived barriers, and more positive social norms) and female gender also predicted acupuncture preference, whereas race and educational status did not. CONCLUSION: Acupuncture may be a preferable treatment option among cancer patients at risk of inadequately controlled pain due to fear of analgesic side effects. Evidence-based integration of acupuncture and analgesics, guided by patient treatment preferences, represents an essential aspect of patient-centered care and has potential to address unmet cancer pain management needs.
Asunto(s)
Terapia por Acupuntura/métodos , Analgésicos/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias/complicaciones , Manejo del Dolor/métodos , Dolor/tratamiento farmacológico , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias/tratamiento farmacológico , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: This study describes individual cancer patients' nonuse of extended-release or long-acting (ER/LA) opioids, including periods of gap between opioid doses taken. DESIGN: Secondary analysis of a three-month observational study of prescribed ER/LA opioids monitored using electronic pill caps. SETTING: Two outpatient oncology clinics of a large health system in the Mid-Atlantic region. PARTICIPANTS: Inclusion was based on self-identified African Americans and whites, at least 18 years old, diagnosed with solid tumors or multiple myeloma. For the current analysis, the additional inclusion criterion was prescription of an oral ER/LA opioid for cancer pain to be taken around the clock. METHODS: The electronic monitoring period for each study participant was partitioned into intervals of days between days with one or more openings (using medication event monitoring systems) representing rates of ER/LA opioid nonuse over consecutive days and over time. RESULTS: Of the sample (N = 109), two-thirds of the cancer patients had some nonuse of prescribed ER/LA opioids, with one in four having nonuse during 31.5-87.5% of their electronic-monitoring periods. Nonuse over periods of five or more, six or more, and seven or more consecutive days occurred for 37.6%, 34.9%, and 30.3% of the participants, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: About one in three ambulatory cancer patients in this study had substantial gaps between days of ER/LA opioid use, potentially resulting in risk of overdose depending upon the prescribed ER/LA opioid type, dose, and length of the time the opioid was stopped and resumed at the previous dose. This phenomenon has received little to no attention in the opioid safety discourse.
Asunto(s)
Analgésicos Opioides , Neoplasias , Adolescente , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapéutico , Preparaciones de Acción Retardada , Electrónica , Humanos , Neoplasias/tratamiento farmacológico , Pacientes AmbulatoriosRESUMEN
The purpose of this consensus paper was to convene leaders and scholars from eight Expert Panels of the American Academy of Nursing and provide recommendations to advance nursing's roles and responsibility to ensure universal access to palliative care. Part I of this consensus paper herein provides the rationale and background to support the policy, education, research, and clinical practice recommendations put forward in Part II. On behalf of the Academy, the evidence-based recommendations will guide nurses, policy makers, government representatives, professional associations, and interdisciplinary and community partners to integrate palliative nursing services across health and social care settings. The consensus paper's 43 authors represent eight countries (Australia, Canada, England, Kenya, Lebanon, Liberia, South Africa, United States of America) and extensive international health experience, thus providing a global context for the subject matter. The authors recommend greater investments in palliative nursing education and nurse-led research, nurse engagement in policy making, enhanced intersectoral partnerships with nursing, and an increased profile and visibility of palliative nurses worldwide. By enacting these recommendations, nurses working in all settings can assume leading roles in delivering high-quality palliative care globally, particularly for minoritized, marginalized, and other at-risk populations.
Asunto(s)
Consenso , Testimonio de Experto , Enfermería de Cuidados Paliativos al Final de la Vida , Cuidados Paliativos , Atención de Salud Universal , Educación en Enfermería , Salud Global , Disparidades en Atención de Salud , Humanos , Enfermeras Administradoras , Sociedades de EnfermeríaRESUMEN
Parents are commonly responsible for making health care decisions for their seriously ill children in the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU); however, the factors influencing their decisions may vary. This integrative review examined the empirical literature between 2013 and 2018 to understand factors pertaining to parents' decision-making about serious illness care of their children in the PICU. Seventeen studies met the inclusion criteria with three key findings. First, parent-clinician communication in the PICU is critical; second, most parents want to be the final decision-maker for their critically ill child; and third, parents' emotions, support systems, and the child's clinical status impact decision-making. Parental perspectives are important to consider when discussing serious illness care decisions for critically ill children. Further inquiry is needed into how the parent-clinician encounter impacts the decision-making process and subsequent outcomes in this population.
Asunto(s)
Toma de Decisiones , Padres , Niño , Comunicación , Enfermedad Crítica , Humanos , Unidades de Cuidado Intensivo PediátricoRESUMEN
Opioids are a critical component of pain relief strategies for the management of patients with cancer and sickle cell disease. The escalation of opioid addiction and overdose in the United States has led to increased scrutiny of opioid prescribing practices. Multiple reports have revealed that regulatory and coverage policies, intended to curb inappropriate opioid use, have created significant barriers for many patients. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Comprehensive Cancer Network, and American Society of Clinical Oncology each publish clinical practice guidelines for the management of chronic pain. A recent JAMA Oncology article highlighted perceived variability in recommendations among these guidelines. In response, leadership from guideline organizations, government representatives, and authors of the original article met to discuss challenges and solutions. The meeting featured remarks by the Commissioner of Food and Drugs, presentations on each clinical practice guideline, an overview of the pain management needs of patients with sickle cell disease, an overview of perceived differences among guidelines, and a discussion of differences and commonalities among the guidelines. The meeting revealed that although each guideline varies in the intended patient population, target audience, and methodology, there is no disagreement among recommendations when applied to the appropriate patient and clinical situation. It was determined that clarification and education are needed regarding the intent, patient population, and scope of each clinical practice guideline, rather than harmonization of guideline recommendations. Clinical practice guidelines can serve as a resource for policymakers and payers to inform policy and coverage determinations.
Asunto(s)
Anemia de Células Falciformes/complicaciones , Dolor en Cáncer/diagnóstico , Dolor en Cáncer/terapia , Neoplasias/complicaciones , Manejo del Dolor , Dolor/etiología , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Analgésicos Opioides/administración & dosificación , Analgésicos Opioides/efectos adversos , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapéutico , Dolor en Cáncer/etiología , Toma de Decisiones Clínicas , Manejo de la Enfermedad , Susceptibilidad a Enfermedades , Humanos , Dolor/diagnóstico , Manejo del Dolor/métodos , Manejo del Dolor/normasRESUMEN
Objectives: The stress-related psychological symptoms experienced by informal family caregivers do not always improve or resolve after the death of the care recipient. The purpose of this study was to explore the independent associations of sociodemographic variables, personality and coping, environmental variables, and caregiver guilt with the sleep quality and psychological distress of former family caregivers of individuals with dementia following care recipient's death.Method: A cross-sectional, correlational study was conducted with a sample of 171 former family caregivers of people with dementia. Participants completed an online survey comprised of six instruments and demographic items. Caregiver personal variables (e.g. personality and coping), environmental variables, guilt, psychological distress (depressive and anxiety symptoms), and sleep quality were evaluated using psychometrically validated measures.Results: In bivariate analysis, post-caregiving guilt was significantly associated with depressive and anxiety symptoms (p < 0.01). After controlling for covariates, dysfunctional coping and neuroticism explained 32% of the variance in depressive symptoms (R2 = .52, ΔR2 = .32, F(5, 165) = 36.24, p < .001) and 24% of the variance in anxiety symptoms (R2 = .41, ΔR2 = .24, F(5, 165) = 22.65, p < .001), while dysfunctional coping, pre-loss depression, and extraversion accounted for 16% of the variance in sleep quality (R2 = .30, ΔR2 = .16, F(6, 164) = 11.44, p < .001).Conclusion: This study demonstrates the critical role of personal variables, including personality traits, coping strategies, and pre-loss depression, in explaining psychological distress and sleep quality in this sample of former dementia caregivers.
Asunto(s)
Adaptación Psicológica , Cuidadores/psicología , Demencia , Distrés Psicológico , Trastornos del Sueño-Vigilia/psicología , Sueño/fisiología , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Ansiedad/psicología , Estudios Transversales , Demencia/psicología , Extraversión Psicológica , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Calidad de Vida/psicología , Trastornos del Sueño-Vigilia/etiología , Estrés Psicológico/psicologíaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Racial and ethnic disparities in pain management are widely documented in the United States. The 2016 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidelines for opioid prescribing have generated new imperatives for using complementary and alternative medicine approaches (CAM) to manage chronic pain, including cancer pain. This review's purpose was to explore the prevalence of CAM use for cancer-related pain among racial and ethnic minorities and to organize these findings according to the CAM modalities proposed by the National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (NCCIH). DESIGN: An integrative review of the literature published between 2007 and 2017. DATA SOURCES: PubMed and SCOPUS databases (2007-2017). REVIEW/ANALYSIS METHODS: Articles were included if they engaged in explicit analysis of racial or ethnic differences in CAM use for cancer pain in the outpatient setting, yielding 13 articles for final analysis. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: Overall, CAM use for any modality ranged from 51% to 83%. Mind-body therapies were reported most, and energy therapies the least. Differences in CAM use were most often attributable to socioeconomic status (SES), with those of higher SES associated with greater use of practitioner-assisted CAM therapies and those of lower SES with greater use of free therapies. This difference has implications for achieving adequate and consistent pain relief among subgroups of patients with cancer. This review also identifies a literature gap regarding racial/ethnic disparities in access to CAM for cancer pain, and a need for validated measures to assess CAM use.
Asunto(s)
Dolor en Cáncer/terapia , Terapias Complementarias/estadística & datos numéricos , Manejo del Dolor/estadística & datos numéricos , Grupos Raciales/estadística & datos numéricos , Factores Socioeconómicos , Terapias Complementarias/métodos , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias/complicaciones , Manejo del Dolor/métodos , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/normas , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Grupos Raciales/etnología , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Among cancer patients in the United States, African American cancer patients have the highest mortality rate and shortest survival rate. Although depression is known as a predictor of mortality in cancer and a potential barrier to health care utilization, research on depression in African American patients is limited. Cancer pain can interfere with an individual's ability to cope with depression. AIMS: To identify factors that are associated with a positive screening of depressive symptoms assessed by the PHQ-8 in African American patients treated for cancer pain. DESIGN: Secondary data analysis of a cross-sectional study of opioid adherence. SETTING: Medical oncology, palliative care, and radiation oncology clinics in Atlanta, Georgia. PARTICIPANTS/SUBJECTS: African American patients with cancer pain in the parent study. METHODS: Independent samples t-test was used to assess variable correlations with and without depressive symptoms. Adjusted logistic regression was conducted to identify factors that were associated with presence of depressive symptoms. RESULTS: Mean patient age was 55.6 years, and nearly 38% had a PHQ-8 score of >10 indicating presence of moderate to severe depressive symptoms. Participants with depressive symptoms had significantly higher means for anxiety and pain interference with mood than those without depressive symptoms. Factors that were significantly associated with depressive symptoms were anxiety, pain interfering with mood, and lack of involvement with a religious congregation. CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this study help to identify African American cancer patients at risk for depression and demonstrates the need for increased screening for depression in this underserved population.
Asunto(s)
Negro o Afroamericano/psicología , Dolor en Cáncer/complicaciones , Depresión/complicaciones , Adaptación Psicológica , Adulto , Negro o Afroamericano/etnología , Negro o Afroamericano/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano , Dolor en Cáncer/etnología , Dolor en Cáncer/psicología , Estudios Transversales , Depresión/etnología , Depresión/psicología , Femenino , Georgia/etnología , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Cuestionario de Salud del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Many patients with cancer pain deviate from prescribed analgesic regimens. Our aim was to elicit the trade-offs patients make based on their beliefs about analgesic use and rank utilities (importance scores) using maximum difference (MaxDiff) scaling. We also investigated if there were unique clusters of patients based on their analgesic beliefs. METHODS: This was a secondary analysis of a three-month, prospective observational study. Patients (N = 207) were self-identified African Americans and Whites, >18 years, diagnosed with multiple myeloma or solid tumor, and were prescribed at least one around-the-clock analgesic for cancer pain. MaxDiff analysis allowed us to identify patients utilities. Second, a cluster analysis assisted in ranking how analgesic beliefs differed by groups. Third, clusters were described by comparing key sociodemographic and clinical variables. RESULTS: Participants' beliefs were a significant factor in choices related to analgesic use (chi-square = 498.145, p < .0001). The belief, 'Pain meds keep you from knowing what is going on in your body', had the highest patient endorsement. Two distinct clusters of patients based on analgesic beliefs were identified; 'knowing body' was ranked as top priority for both clusters. The belief that cancer patients become addicted to analgesics was moderately important for both clusters. Severity of side effects was the only key variable significantly different between clusters (p = .043). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings support tailored pain management interventions that attend to individual beliefs about cancer pain and analgesic use. Future research should explore the relationship between analgesic utilities, actual analgesic taking behaviors, and how they impact patients' cancer pain outcomes.
Asunto(s)
Analgésicos/normas , Dolor en Cáncer/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto , Analgésicos/efectos adversos , Analgésicos/farmacología , Análisis de Varianza , Dolor en Cáncer/psicología , Femenino , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias/complicaciones , Manejo del Dolor/efectos adversos , Manejo del Dolor/métodos , Manejo del Dolor/normas , Dimensión del Dolor/métodos , Pennsylvania , Estudios ProspectivosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Previous research suggests that racial disparities in patients' reported analgesic adverse effects are partially mediated by the type of opioid prescribed to African Americans despite the presence of certain comorbidities, such as renal disease. AIMS: We aimed to identify independent predictors of the type of opioid prescribed to cancer outpatients and determine if race and chronic kidney disease independently predict prescription type, adjusting for relevant sociodemographic and clinical confounders. DESIGN: We conducted a secondary analysis of a 3-month observational study. SETTING: Outpatient oncology clinics of an academic medical center. PARTICIPANTS/SUBJECTS: Patients were older than 18 years of age, self-identified as African American or White, and had an analgesic prescription for cancer pain. METHODS: Cancer patients (N = 241) were recruited from outpatient oncology clinics within a large mid-Atlantic healthcare system. RESULTS: Consistent with published literature, most patients (75.5%) were prescribed either morphine or oxycodone preparations as oral opioid therapy for cancer pain. When compared with Whites, African Americans were significantly more likely to be prescribed morphine (33% vs 14%) and less likely to be prescribed oxycodone (38% vs 64%) (p < .001). The estimated odds for African Americans to receive morphine were 2.573 times that for Whites (95% confidence interval 1.077-6.134) after controlling for insurance type, income, and pain levels. In addition, the presence of private health insurance was negatively associated with the prescription of morphine and positively associated with prescription of oxycodone in separate multivariable models. The presence of chronic kidney disease did not predict type of analgesic prescribed. CONCLUSIONS: Both race and insurance type independently predict type of opioid selection for cancer outpatients. Larger clinical studies are needed to fully understand the sources and clinical consequences of racial differences in opioid selection for cancer pain.
Asunto(s)
Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapéutico , Dolor en Cáncer/tratamiento farmacológico , Cobertura del Seguro/estadística & datos numéricos , Grupos Raciales/estadística & datos numéricos , Administración Oral , Adulto , Anciano , Dolor en Cáncer/psicología , Femenino , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Morfina/farmacología , Morfina/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias/complicaciones , Neoplasias/psicología , Pacientes Ambulatorios/psicología , Pacientes Ambulatorios/estadística & datos numéricos , Oxicodona/farmacología , Oxicodona/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Pain is one of the most common symptoms identified along the cancer trajectory. Among patients with moderate to severe cancer pain, nonadherence to prescribed analgesics may complicate treatment plans and exacerbate pain severity. Nonadherent behaviors are likely due to a number of individual/family, provider, and system level factors and may lead to negative pain-related outcomes. PURPOSE: The purpose of this concept analysis is to clarify the concept of analgesic nonadherence for cancer pain and qualify its utility in the context of the opioid crisis. METHOD: Walker and Avant's (2019) method for concept analysis was used. We integrated empirical evidence, relevant literature, and sociopolitical considerations related to the opioid crisis to provide critical and timely analysis. Data were collected from a search of PubMed, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and Scopus. The search yielded 418 individual records. Empirical articles using quantitative and qualitative methodologies pertaining to analgesic nonadherence for cancer pain in adult outpatient settings, written in English, with an abstract, and published between 2010 and 2018 were considered. Other relevant literature sources were used if additional criteria were met. A total of 33 records were selected for detailed review. FINDINGS: Few studies link analgesic nonadherence to patient outcomes highlighting a significant literature gap. Given the available evidence, a definition for analgesic nonadherence is proposed for future use in research, education, practice, and policy settings. DISCUSSION: The paucity of empirical data combined with the implications of the opioid crisis and conflicting pain management guidelines create uncertainty about the utility of analgesic nonadherence. The concept of analgesic nonadherence warrants further normative and empirical research to clarify the role of opioids and the meaning of nonadherence in shaping pain-related outcomes within the current sociopolitical environment.
Asunto(s)
Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapéutico , Analgésicos/uso terapéutico , Dolor en Cáncer/tratamiento farmacológico , Cumplimiento de la Medicación , Neoplasias/tratamiento farmacológico , Epidemia de Opioides , Adulto , Humanos , Masculino , Neoplasias/complicaciones , Manejo del Dolor/normas , AutoadministraciónRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: In response to the national opioid crisis, governmental and medical organizations have called for broader insurance coverage of acupuncture to improve access to nonpharmacologic pain therapies, especially in cancer populations, where undertreatment of pain is prevalent. We evaluated whether cancer patients would be willing to use insurance-covered acupuncture for pain. DESIGN AND SETTING: We conducted a cross-sectional survey of cancer patients with pain at one academic center and 11 community hospitals. METHODS: We used logistic regression models to examine factors associated with willingness to use insurance-covered acupuncture for pain. RESULTS: Among 634 cancer patients, 304 (47.9%) reported willingness to use insurance-covered acupuncture for pain. In univariate analyses, patients were more likely to report willingness if they had severe pain (odds ratio [OR] = 1.59, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.03-2.45) but were less likely if they were nonwhite (OR = 0.59, 95% CI = 0.39-0.90) or had only received high school education or less (OR = 0.46, 95% CI = 0.32-0.65). After adjusting for attitudes and beliefs in multivariable analyses, willingness was no longer significantly associated with education (adjusted OR [aOR] = 0.78, 95% CI = 0.50-1.21) and was more negatively associated with nonwhite race (aOR = 0.49, 95% CI = 0.29-0.84). CONCLUSIONS: Approximately one in two cancer patients was willing to use insurance-covered acupuncture for pain. Willingness was influenced by patients' attitudes and beliefs, which are potentially modifiable through counseling and education. Further research on racial disparities is needed to close the gap in utilization as acupuncture is integrated into insurance plans in response to the opioid crisis.