Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
Tipo del documento
Asunto de la revista
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Mult Scler ; 16(6): 660-9, 2010 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20350960

RESUMEN

Magnetization transfer ratio (MTR) is a sensitive parameter to quantify the integrity of myelinated white matter in patients with multiple sclerosis. Lesional MTR decreases in the acute phase due to demyelination, and subsequently shows recovery depending on the degree of remyelination in the absence of axonal loss. Recovery of average lesion MTR therefore might prove a viable outcome measure to assess the effect of remyelinating agents. Our objective was to determine the required sample size for phase II multicentre clinical trials using the recovery of average lesion MTR as primary outcome measure. With 7-monthly MRI scans, the MTR evolution of 349 new enhancing lesions before and after enhancement was assessed in 32 MS patients from 5 centres. Multilevel models were fitted to the data yielding estimates for the variance components, which were applied in power calculations. Sample sizes were determined for placebo-controlled, multicentre trials using lesional MTR recovery post-enhancement as primary outcome measure. Average lesion MTR decreased slightly in the build-up to enhancement, decreased dramatically during enhancement and showed recovery in the period after cessation. The power calculations showed that for a power of 80%, approximately 136 patients per trial (mean number of 6 lesions per patient) are required to detect a 30% increase in lesional MTR post-enhancement compared with placebo, whereas 48 subjects are required to detect a 50% increase in lesional MTR compared with placebo. Recovery of lesion MTR is a feasible outcome measure for future multicentre clinical trials measuring the effect of remyelinating agents.


Asunto(s)
Encéfalo/patología , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética/métodos , Esclerosis Múltiple/patología , Fibras Nerviosas Mielínicas/patología , Adulto , Distribución de Chi-Cuadrado , Ensayos Clínicos como Asunto , Femenino , Humanos , Procesamiento de Imagen Asistido por Computador , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Resultado del Tratamiento
2.
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol ; 39(1): 46-53, 2018 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29191870

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Precise in vivo measurement of deep GM volume change is a highly demanded prerequisite for an adequate evaluation of disease progression and new treatments. However, quantitative data on the reproducibility of deep GM structure volumetry are not yet available. In this paper we aim to investigate this reproducibility using a large multicenter dataset. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We have assessed the reproducibility of 2 automated segmentation software packages (FreeSurfer and the FMRIB Integrated Registration and Segmentation Tool) by quantifying the volume changes of deep GM structures by using back-to-back MR imaging scans from the Alzheimer Disease Neuroimaging Initiative's multicenter dataset. Five hundred sixty-two subjects with scans at baseline and 1 year were included. Reproducibility was investigated in the bilateral caudate nucleus, putamen, amygdala, globus pallidus, and thalamus by carrying out descriptives as well as multilevel and variance component analysis. RESULTS: Median absolute back-to-back differences varied between GM structures, ranging from 59.6-156.4 µL for volume change, and 1.26%-8.63% for percentage volume change. FreeSurfer had a better performance for the outcome of longitudinal volume change for the bilateral amygdala, putamen, left caudate nucleus (P < .005), and right thalamus (P < .001). For longitudinal percentage volume change, Freesurfer performed better for the left amygdala, bilateral caudate nucleus, and left putamen (P < .001). Smaller limits of agreement were found for FreeSurfer for both outcomes for all GM structures except the globus pallidus. Our results showed that back-to-back differences in 1-year percentage volume change were approximately 1.5-3.5 times larger than the mean measured 1-year volume change of those structures. CONCLUSIONS: Longitudinal deep GM atrophy measures should be interpreted with caution. Furthermore, deep GM atrophy measurement techniques require substantially improved reproducibility, specifically when aiming for personalized medicine.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedad de Alzheimer/diagnóstico por imagen , Encéfalo/diagnóstico por imagen , Sustancia Gris/diagnóstico por imagen , Procesamiento de Imagen Asistido por Computador/métodos , Neuroimagen/métodos , Adulto , Enfermedad de Alzheimer/patología , Atrofia/patología , Encéfalo/patología , Conjuntos de Datos como Asunto , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Femenino , Sustancia Gris/patología , Humanos , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética/métodos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Programas Informáticos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA