Effect of Yoga and Mediational Influence of Fatigue on Walking, Physical Activity, and Quality of Life Among Cancer Survivors.

BACKGROUND: Cancer-related fatigue (CRF) negatively affects survivors' walking, engagement in physical activity (PA), and quality of life (QoL). Yoga is an effective therapy for treating CRF; however, evidence from large clinical trials regarding how reducing CRF through yoga influences CRF's interference with survivors' walking, engagement in PA, and QoL is not available. We examined the effects of yoga and the mediational influence of CRF on CRF's interference with walking, PA, and QoL among cancer survivors in a multicenter phase III randomized controlled trial. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Cancer survivors (n=410) with insomnia 2 to 24 months posttreatment were randomized to a 4-week yoga intervention-Yoga for Cancer Survivors (YOCAS)-or standard care. A symptom inventory was used to assess how much CRF interfered with survivors' walking, PA, and QoL. The Multidimensional Fatigue Symptom Inventory-Short Form was used to assess CRF. Two-tailed t tests and analyses of covariance were used to examine within-group and between-group differences. Path analysis was used to evaluate mediational relationships between CRF and changes in CRF's interference with walking, PA, and QoL among survivors. RESULTS: Compared with standard care controls, YOCAS participants reported significant improvements in CRF's interference with walking, PA, and QoL at postintervention (all effect size = -0.33; all P≤.05). Improvements in CRF resulting from yoga accounted for significant proportions of the improvements in walking (44%), PA (53%), and QoL (45%; all P≤.05). CONCLUSIONS: A significant proportion (44%-53%) of the YOCAS effect on CRF's interference with walking, PA, and QoL was due to improvements in CRF among cancer survivors. Yoga should be introduced and included as a treatment option for survivors experiencing fatigue. By reducing fatigue, survivors further improve their walking, engagement in PA, and QoL.

Effect of Acupuncture vs Sham Acupuncture or Waitlist Control on Joint Pain Related to Aromatase Inhibitors Among Women With Early-Stage Breast Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: Musculoskeletal symptoms are the most common adverse effects of aromatase inhibitors and often result in therapy discontinuation. Small studies suggest that acupuncture may decrease aromatase inhibitor-related joint symptoms. Objective: To determine the effect of acupuncture in reducing aromatase inhibitor-related joint pain. Design, Setting, and Patients: Randomized clinical trial conducted at 11 academic centers and clinical sites in the United States from March 2012 to February 2017 (final date of follow-up, September 5, 2017). Eligible patients were postmenopausal women with early-stage breast cancer who were taking an aromatase inhibitor and scored at least 3 on the Brief Pain Inventory Worst Pain (BPI-WP) item (score range, 0-10; higher scores indicate greater pain). Interventions: Patients were randomized 2:1:1 to the true acupuncture (n = 110), sham acupuncture (n = 59), or waitlist control (n = 57) group. True acupuncture and sham acupuncture protocols consisted of 12 acupuncture sessions over 6 weeks (2 sessions per week), followed by 1 session per week for 6 weeks. The waitlist control group did not receive any intervention. All participants were offered 10 acupuncture sessions to be used between weeks 24 and 52. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary end point was the 6-week BPI-WP score. Mean 6-week BPI-WP scores were compared by study group using linear regression, adjusted for baseline pain and stratification factors (clinically meaningful difference specified as 2 points). Results: Among 226 randomized patients (mean [SD] age, 60.7 [8.6] years; 88% white; mean [SD] baseline BPI-WP score, 6.6 [1.5]), 206 (91.1%) completed the trial. From baseline to 6 weeks, the mean observed BPI-WP score decreased by 2.05 points (reduced pain) in the true acupuncture group, by 1.07 points in the sham acupuncture group, and by 0.99 points in the waitlist control group. The adjusted difference for true acupuncture vs sham acupuncture was 0.92 points (95% CI, 0.20-1.65; P = .01) and for true acupuncture vs waitlist control was 0.96 points (95% CI, 0.24-1.67; P = .01). Patients in the true acupuncture group experienced more grade 1 bruising compared with patients in the sham acupuncture group (47% vs 25%; P = .01). Conclusions and Relevance: Among postmenopausal women with early-stage breast cancer and aromatase inhibitor-related arthralgias, true acupuncture compared with sham acupuncture or with waitlist control resulted in a statistically significant reduction in joint pain at 6 weeks, although the observed improvement was of uncertain clinical importance. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01535066.

Hormone receptor status does not affect prognosis in metaplastic breast cancer: a population-based analysis with comparison to infiltrating ductal and lobular carcinomas.

BACKGROUND: Metaplastic breast cancer is a rare histologic variant among breast cancers. We sought to investigate the impact of hormone receptor status in metaplastic breast cancer and compare outcomes with common histologic variants of breast cancer. METHODS: The study was performed utilizing the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. A query was made for patients with metaplastic breast cancer from 2000 to 2010. A separate query identified all patients with infiltrating ductal (IDC) or lobular (ILC) carcinoma during the same period. Effect of hormone receptor status was evaluated using Cox regression analysis. Significance was assessed for p < 0.05. RESULTS: A total of 2,338 patients with metaplastic breast cancer were available for study. Most tumors were hormone receptor negative (79.0 %) and greater than or equal to grade 3 (82.9 %). For comparison, 382,667 and 44,813 patients with IDC and ILC, respectively, were obtained. Overall 5-year survival for metaplastic breast cancer was 62.2 % compared with 81.2 % for IDC (p < 0.001) and 80.2 % for ILC (p < 0.001). For metaplastic cases, no difference in 5-year survival was found between hormone-positive and hormone-negative tumors (65.7 vs. 63.5 %; p = 0.70). Multivariate analysis demonstrated metaplastic histology as an independent risk factor for cancer-related mortality both among hormone-positive (hazard ratio [HR] 2.4; 95 % confidence interval [CI] 1.8-3.0; p < 0.001) and hormone-negative (HR 1.7; 95 % CI 1.5-1.9; p < 0.001) breast cancers. CONCLUSION: Metaplastic breast cancer is an aggressive histologic variant that portends a poor prognosis compared with common breast cancer subtypes. Contrary to other breast cancers, hormone receptor positivity does not improve prognosis in metaplastic breast cancer.

Comparison of Radiation With or Without Concurrent Trastuzumab for HER2-Positive Ductal Carcinoma In Situ Resected by Lumpectomy: A Phase III Clinical Trial.

PURPOSE: Preclinical studies report that trastuzumab (T) can boost radiotherapy (RT) effectiveness. The primary aim of the B-43 trial was to assess the efficacy of RT alone vs concurrent RT plus T in preventing recurrence of ipsilateral breast cancer (IBTR) in women with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eligibility: Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status 0 or 1, DCIS resected by lumpectomy, known estrogen receptor (ER) and/or progesterone receptor (PgR), and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) status by centralized testing. Whole-breast RT was given concurrently with T. Stratification was by menopausal status, adjuvant endocrine therapy plan, and nuclear grade. Definitive intent-to-treat primary analysis was to be conducted when either 163 IBTR events occurred or all accrued patients were on study ≥ 5 years. RESULTS: There were 2,014 participants who were randomly assigned. Median follow-up time as of December 31, 2019, was 79.2 months. At primary definitive analysis, 114 IBTR events occurred: RT arm, 63 and RT plus T arm, 51 (hazard ratio [HR], 0.81; 95% CI, 0.56 to 1.17; P value = .26). There were 34 who were invasive: RT arm, 18 and RT plus T arm, 20 (HR, 1.11; 95% CI, 0.59 to 2.10; P value = .71). Seventy-six were DCIS: RT arm, 45 and RT plus T arm, 31 (HR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.43 to 1.08; P value = .11). Annual IBTR event rates were: RT arm, 0.99%/y and RT plus T arm, 0.79%/y. The study did not reach the 163 protocol-specified events, so the definitive analysis was triggered by all patients having been on study for ≥ 5 years. CONCLUSION: Addition of T to RT did not achieve the objective of 36% reduction in IBTR rate but did achieve a modest but statistically nonsignificant reduction of 19%. Nonetheless, this trial had negative results. Further exploration of RT plus T is needed in HER2-positive DCIS before its routine delivery in patients with DCIS resected by lumpectomy.

The impact of obesity on treatment choices and outcomes in operable breast cancer.

INTRODUCTION: Obesity has been associated with negative oncologic outcomes in breast cancer. METHODS: Retrospective review of patients with operable breast cancer at a single institution from 2009 to 2012. Patients with carcinoma in situ or metastatic disease were excluded. Variables included utilization of MRI, surgical treatment, perioperative, and long-term oncologic outcomes. Primary outcome was rate of breast conserving surgery. Secondary outcomes included MRI utilization, contralateral prophylactic mastectomy, and perioperative outcomes. RESULTS: There were 1566 patients included for the study, 596 (38%) of whom were obese. MRI was utilized less in obese patients (62.4% vs 51.2%, p < 0.001). Breast conserving surgery was more common in obese patients (53.1% vs 59.7%, p 0.010). There was no difference in performance of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy or post-mastectomy reconstruction. Perioperative outcomes were inferior in obese patients including increased surgical site infections (5.7% vs 11.7%, p < 0.001), return to the emergency department (2.5% vs 5.2%, p 0.004), and hospital readmissions (1.8% vs 3.7%, p 0.017). No difference in survival was observed. CONCLUSION: Obese patients with operable breast cancer receive different treatment than non-obese patients, however survival and recurrence outcomes were similar among the two groups.

Targeting MET and EGFR crosstalk signaling in triple-negative breast cancers.

There is a vital need for improved therapeutic strategies that are effective in both primary and metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). Current treatment options for TNBC patients are restricted to chemotherapy; however tyrosine kinases are promising druggable targets due to their high expression in multiple TNBC subtypes. Since coexpression of receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs) can promote signaling crosstalk and cell survival in the presence of kinase inhibitors, it is likely that multiple RTKs will need to be inhibited to enhance therapeutic benefit and prevent resistance. The MET and EGFR receptors are actionable targets due to their high expression in TNBC; however crosstalk between MET and EGFR has been implicated in therapeutic resistance to single agent use of MET or EGFR inhibitors in several cancer types. Therefore it is likely that dual inhibition of MET and EGFR is required to prevent crosstalk signaling and acquired resistance. In this study, we evaluated the heterogeneity of MET and EGFR expression and activation in primary and metastatic TNBC tumorgrafts and determined the efficacy of MET (MGCD265 or crizotinib) and/or EGFR (erlotinib) inhibition against TNBC progression. Here we demonstrate that combined MET and EGFR inhibition with either MGCD265 and erlotinib treatment or crizotinib and erlotinib treatment were highly effective at abrogating tumor growth and significantly decreased the variability in treatment response compared to monotherapy. These results advance our understanding of the RTK signaling architecture in TNBC and demonstrate that combined MET and EGFR inhibition may be a promising therapeutic strategy for TNBC patients.

Measuring the impact of the American College of Surgeons Oncology Group Z0011 trial on breast cancer surgery in a community health system.

BACKGROUND: The American College of Surgeons Oncology Group Z0011 trial has been lauded as practice changing. We sought to identify its impact on breast cancer surgery in the community hospital setting. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed from 8 community hospitals identifying patients with invasive breast cancer meeting the Z0011 criteria. The primary outcome measures were the rate of completion axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) and performance of intraoperative sentinel lymph node (SLN) analysis over time. RESULTS: A total of 1,125 lumpectomies with SLN biopsies were performed with 180 subjects meeting inclusion criteria. Performance of ALND (P < .0001) and intraoperative SLN analysis (P < .0001) declined during each time period. Patients more likely to undergo ALND included those with extracapsular extension (odds ratio [OR] 12.8, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.5 to 67.1) and those who underwent reoperative surgery (OR 10.8, 95% CI 2.6 to 44.4) or intraoperative SLN analysis (OR 5.1, 95% CI 1.2 to 21.9). CONCLUSION: American College of Surgeons Oncology Group Z0011 trial has been rapidly practice changing in the community hospital setting.

Multicenter, randomized controlled trial of yoga for sleep quality among cancer survivors.

PURPOSE: Thirty percent to 90% of cancer survivors report impaired sleep quality post-treatment, which can be severe enough to increase morbidity and mortality. Lifestyle interventions, such as exercise, are recommended in conjunction with drugs and cognitive behavioral therapy for the treatment of impaired sleep. Preliminary evidence indicates that yoga-a mind-body practice and form of exercise-may improve sleep among cancer survivors. The primary aim of this randomized, controlled clinical trial was to determine the efficacy of a standardized yoga intervention compared with standard care for improving global sleep quality (primary outcome) among post-treatment cancer survivors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In all, 410 survivors suffering from moderate or greater sleep disruption between 2 and 24 months after surgery, chemotherapy, and/or radiation therapy were randomly assigned to standard care or standard care plus the 4-week yoga intervention. The yoga intervention used the Yoga for Cancer Survivors (YOCAS) program consisting of pranayama (breathing exercises), 16 Gentle Hatha and Restorative yoga asanas (postures), and meditation. Participants attended two 75-minute sessions per week. Sleep quality was assessed by using the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index and actigraphy pre- and postintervention. RESULTS: In all, 410 survivors were accrued (96% female; mean age, 54 years; 75% had breast cancer). Yoga participants demonstrated greater improvements in global sleep quality and, secondarily, subjective sleep quality, daytime dysfunction, wake after sleep onset, sleep efficiency, and medication use at postintervention (all P ≤ .05) compared with standard care participants. CONCLUSION: Yoga, specifically the YOCAS program, is a useful treatment for improving sleep quality and reducing sleep medication use among cancer survivors.

MET and ERBB2 are coexpressed in ERBB2+ breast cancer and contribute to innate resistance.

UNLABELLED: Breast cancer displays significant intratumoral heterogeneity, which has been shown to have a substantial impact on both innate and acquired resistance to tyrosine kinase inhibitors. The heterogeneous expression of multiple receptor tyrosine kinases (RTK) in cancers supports tumor signaling robustness and plays a significant role in resistance to targeted inhibition. Recent studies have revealed interactions between the MET receptor and the ERBB receptor family in the therapeutic resistance of several cancers. In this study, the relationship between MET expression/activity and the expression/activity of the ERBB receptor family in human breast cancer was interrogated. Importantly, a significant percentage of ERBB2(+) tumors coexpressing MET and ERBB2 were observed and displayed significant heterogeneity with subpopulations of cells that are MET(-)/ERBB2(+), MET(+)/ERBB2(-), and MET(+)/ERBB2(+). In a MET(+)/ERBB2(+) breast cancer cell line, MET depletion resulted in increased ERBB2 activation, and conversely, ERBB2 depletion resulted in increased MET activation. Neither EGFR nor ERBB3 compensated for MET or ERBB2 knockdown. The loss of either MET or ERBB2 led to a decrease in PI3K/AKT signaling and increased dependency on MAPK. These data show that a subset of ERBB2(+) breast cancers express MET and contain MET(+)/ERBB2(+) subpopulations. Moreover, analysis of RTK activation during ERBB2 knockdown indicated that MET signaling is a compensatory pathway of resistance. IMPLICATIONS: ERBB2(+) breast cancers with MET(+)/ERBB2(+) subpopulations may have an innate resistance to ERBB2 inhibition and may benefit from combined MET and ERBB2 inhibition.

Concurrent bevacizumab with a sequential regimen of doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide followed by docetaxel and capecitabine as neoadjuvant therapy for HER2- locally advanced breast cancer: a phase II trial of the NSABP Foundation Research Group.

BACKGROUND: Bevacizumab with chemotherapy improves outcomes in patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC). The purpose of this trial was to determine the activity and safety profile of neoadjuvant bevacizumab with chemotherapy in women with locally advanced breast cancer (LABC). METHODS: Between November 2006 and August 2007, 45 women with HER2(-) LABC began preoperative standard AC (doxorubicin [Adriamycin], cyclophosphamide) × 4 cycles followed by docetaxel 75 mg/m(2) intravenously (I.V.) on day 1 and capecitabine 825 mg/m(2) twice daily on days 1-14 (TX, docetaxel [Taxotere] and capecitabine [Xeloda]) every 21 days for 4 cycles. Bevacizumab 15 mg/kg I.V. was given concurrently with chemotherapy every 21 days for a total of 6 preoperative doses. Postoperatively bevacizumab was resumed for a total of 10 doses. The primary endpoint was pathologic complete response (pCR) in the breast. RESULTS: Thirty patients (66.7%) had stage IIIA disease, 12 (26.7%) patients had stage IIIB, and 3 patients (6.7%) had stage IIIC. Of these, 10 (22%) had inflammatory breast cancer (IBC), and 27 (60%) had estrogen receptor (ER)(+) disease. A pCR in the breast with negative axillary nodes was documented in 4 (9%) of 45 patients. Toxicities that were seen with AC and bevacizumab included fatigue (grade 2/3; 31% and 9%, respectively), mucositis (grade 2/3; 29% and 2%, respectively), and headache (grade 2/3; 16% and 7%, respectively). Toxicities seen with TX and bevacizumab included mucositis (grade 2/3; 48% and 25%, respectively), fatigue (grade 2/3; 43% and 18%, respectively), and hand-foot syndrome (grade 2/3; 34% and 23%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: This regimen demonstrated only modest activity with substantial toxicity and does not appear to warrant further evaluation.

Phase II trial to evaluate gemcitabine and etoposide for locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer.

Prior studies suggest that tumor cell lines harboring RAS mutations display remarkable sensitivity to gemcitabine and etoposide. In a phase II clinical trial of patients with locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer, we evaluated the response rate to a combination of these drugs. Forty chemo-naïve patients with nonresectable and histologically confirmed pancreatic cancer were accrued. Patients received gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m(2) (days 1 and 8) and etoposide 80 mg/m(2) (days 8, 9, and 10; 21-day cycle). The primary end point was radiological response rate. Secondary objectives were determination of overall survival, response duration (time to progression), quality of life, toxicity, and CA 19-9 biomarker response. In 35 evaluable patients, 10 exhibited a radiological partial response and 12 had stable disease in response to treatment. Twenty patients exhibited a >20% decrease in CA 19-9 biomarker levels. Median overall survival was 6.7 months for all patients (40) and 7.2 months for evaluable patients (35). Notably, four patients survived for longer than 1 year, with two patients surviving for more than 2 years. Median time to progression for evaluable patients was 3.1 months. The median overall survival for locally advanced patients was 8.8 months and 6.75 months for metastatic patients. One-year survival was 10% for all patients and 11.4% for evaluable patients. Quality of life improved in 12 patients and remained stable in 3 of the evaluable patients. The primary dose-limiting toxicities were hematologic toxicity and fatigue. These results show that the gemcitabine and etoposide combination is generally well-tolerated and exhibits a response rate similar to other published studies.