Expression III: patients' expectations and preferences regarding physician-patient relationship and clinical management-results of the international NOGGO/ENGOT-ov4-GCIG study in 1830 ovarian cancer patients from European countries.

Backround: The primary aim of this study was to investigate information needs and treatment preferences of patients with ovarian cancer, focusing especially on physician-patient relationship and treatment. Patients and methods: A questionnaire was developed based on the experiences of the national German survey 'Expression II', and was provided to patients with ovarian cancer either at initial diagnosis or with recurrent disease via Internet (online-version) or as print-out-version. Results: From December 2009 to October 2012, a total of 1830 patients with ovarian cancer from eight European countries (Austria, Belgium, France, Germany, Italy, Poland, Romania, Spain) participated, 902 (49.3%) after initial diagnosis and 731 (39.9%) with recurrent ovarian cancer. The median age was 58 years (range 17-89). Nearly all patients (96.2%) had experienced upfront surgery followed by first-line chemotherapy (91.8%). The majority of patients were satisfied with the completeness and comprehensibility of the explanation about the diagnosis and treatment options. The three most important aspects, identified by patients to improve the treatment for ovarian cancer included: 'the therapy should not induce alopecia' (42%), 'there must be more done to counter fatigue' (34.5%) and 'the therapy should be more effective' (29.7%). Out of 659 (36%) patients, who were offered participation in a clinical trial, 476 (26%) were included. Conclusion: This study underlines the high need of patients with ovarian cancer for all details concerning treatment options irrespective of their cultural background, the stage of disease and the patient's age. Increased information requirements regarding potential side effects and treatment alternatives were recorded. Besides the need for more effective therapy, alopecia and fatigue are the most important side effects of concern to patients.

Gemcitabine and capecitabine in previously anthracycline-treated metastatic breast cancer: a multicenter phase II study (SOLTI 0301 trial).

BACKGROUND: On the basis of clinical activity of capecitabine and gemcitabine for metastatic breast cancer, we carried out a multicenter phase II clinical trial on the combination of these two agents in advanced anthracycline-pretreated breast cancer patients. Main objectives were to assess its efficacy and safety profile. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Seventy-six anthracycline-pretreated breast cancer patients were evaluated and were stratified according to previous treatment of advanced disease (group-1: not previously treated and group-2: previously treated). Study treatment consisted of gemcitabine 1000 mg/m(2), i.v., as 30 min-infusion, days 1 and 8 every 21 days, plus oral capecitabine 830 mg/m(2) b.i.d., days 1-14 every 21 days. RESULTS: Overall response rate was 61% for group-1, 48.5% for group-2 and 55.2% for the whole population. Clinical benefit rate was 73% for group-1, 80% for patients in group-2 and 76% for all patients. Median time to progression was 13.0 months for group-1, 8.2 months for group-2 and 11.1 months for the whole population. Most frequent grade 3-4 observed toxic effects per patient were neutropenia (60%), asymptomatic liver toxicity (13.5%), asthenia (14%) and hand-foot syndrome (16%). Only one patient presented febrile neutropenia. No treatment-related deaths occurred. CONCLUSION: Combination of gemcitabine and capecitabine is an active and safe regimen in anthracycline-pretreated breast cancer patients.

Prognostic value of hormonal receptors, p53, ki67 and HER2/neu expression in epithelial ovarian carcinoma.

OBJECTIVE: The role of molecular and biological factors in ovarian cancer is controversial. We investigated the levels of the estrogen (ER) and progesterone (PR) receptors, HER2/neu, p-53 and Ki 67 in patients with advanced ovarian cancer and correlated the results with the clinical course in order to define their predictive or prognostic significance. METHODS: Paraffin-embedded tumor tissues from 72 patients with ovarian cancer treated from 1999 to 2003 were analyzed. Overexpression of C-erb-B2 was defined as herceptest ++/+++ and positive fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) or herceptest +++/+++. Positivity for ER and PR was determined by > or =10% of the cellular membranes immunostained. Statistical analysis was performed to evaluate the prognostic impact of the molecular markers. RESULTS: 49 of the 72 patients were ER + (68%) and 36 PR + (50%). In 45 patients (62.5%) expression of p53 was > or =10%. Overexpression of C-erb-2 was found in 4 tumor samples (5%). A Ki67 labelled nuclear area >30% was found to be associated with a higher rate of complete response (chi(2); p=0.05). None of the biological markers were significantly associated with progression free survival (PFS). By multivariate analysis residual tumor after debulking surgery and ER status were associated with OS (p< or =0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Ki67 nuclear expression >30% is predictive of complete response in advanced ovarian cancer. HER2/neu overexpression is scarce in our study. Positive ER is an independent prognostic factor for OS. Further research with larger studies and hormonal treatment is guaranteed.

Efficacy of fulvestrant in the treatment of postmenopausal women with endocrine-resistant advanced breast cancer in routine clinical practice.

INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to describe the efficacy of fulvestrant 500 mg in postmenopausal women with estrogen receptor (ER)-positive advanced/metastatic breast cancer who had disease progression after receiving anti-estrogen therapy in clinical practice, getting real-world data. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Multicenter, retrospective, observational study conducted in Spain. Postmenopausal women with locally advanced/metastatic ER-positive breast cancer who received treatment with fulvestrant 500 mg after progression with a previous anti-estrogen therapy were eligible. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS); secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS), clinical benefit rate (CBR), duration of clinical benefit (DoCB), and safety profile. RESULTS: A total of 263 women were evaluated (median age, 65.8 years). At a median follow-up of 21.5 months, median PFS and OS were 10.6 and 43.2 months, respectively. PFS according to 1st, 2nd, 3rd, and ≥ 4th lines were 11.5, 10.6, 9.9, and 8.5 months, respectively (p = 0.0245). PFS in patients with visceral involvement was 10 months vs 10.6 months in patients without visceral involvement (p = 0.6604), 9.6 months in patients with high Ki67 vs 10 months in patients with low Ki67 (p = 0.7224), and 10.2 months in HER2+ patients vs 10.3 months in HER2- patients (p = 0.6809). The CBR was 56.5% and the DoCB was 18.4 months. The most frequently adverse events were injection site pain (10.3%) and musculoskeletal disorders (7.6%). CONCLUSIONS: Fulvestrant 500 mg administered in clinical practice was shown to be effective (PFS, 10.6 months; CBR, 56.5%) and well tolerated, in accordance with previous trials.

Correction to: Efficacy of fulvestrant in the treatment of postmenopausal women with endocrine-resistant advanced breast cancer in routine clinical practice.

A sentence under 'Results' heading in the Abstract section was published incorrectly. The correct sentence should read as follows.

Update in the management of ovarian and cervical carcinoma.

Ovarian and cervical cancers are significant health problems. This article provides an update in selected management topics. Paclitaxel and platinum derivatives are the first-line treatment for patients with advanced disease. In selected patients, intraperitoneal chemotherapy has been associated with improved survival but the broad applicability of this strategy is limited by issues of toxicity and feasibility. Management of patients with recurrent disease is based on a number of factors and includes surgery in selected cases, platinum-based chemotherapy for patients with platinum-sensitive disease and other agents such as topotecan and pegylated liposomal formulation of doxorubicin for patients with platinum-resistant disease. In cervical cancer, the most significant issue/event is the demonstration of superior survival with topotecan and cisplatin compared to cisplatin alone. Finally, new agents such as epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors and antiangiogenic agents are being currently tested in these settings.

Combination of oral idarubicin and prednimustine in advanced breast cancer: a phase II study.

The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and toxicity of an idarubicin-prednimustine combination in advanced breast cancer. 19 patients received idarubicin 35 mg/m2 day 1 and prednimustine 100 mg/m2 days 2-6, every 21 days. Three objective responses with a median duration of 7 months were observed. Tolerance was good. A further 23 patients were given idarubicin administered at 15 mg/m2 days 1, 2 and 3 and prednimustine at the aforementioned dosage. 8 (35%) showed an objective response (4 CRs, 4 PRs) with a median duration of 6 months. No severe toxicity was observed. Results suggest activity of idarubicin-prednimustine combinations in advanced breast cancer, and further studies are indicated since this regimen is easily administered, especially to elderly patients.

Phase II trial of vinorelbine in patients with advanced and/or recurrent cervical carcinoma: an EORTC Gynaecological Cancer Cooperative Group Study.

The objective of this phase II study was to assess the efficacy and toxicity of vinorelbine administered as a single agent in the treatment of chemonaïve cervical cancer patients. 46 patients (41 eligible) with cervical cancer (epidermoid or adenocarcinoma) and measurable metastatic and/or recurrent disease localised outside irradiated areas were treated with weekly intravenous (i.v.) vinorelbine 30 mg/m2 infused over 20 min. No prior chemotherapy was allowed. Median age was 53 years (range: 33-73), and performance status 1 (0-2). 31 patients (76%) had prior radiation therapy. There were 7 partial responders (17, 95% confidence interval (CI) 7-32) and 8 stable diseases (20%). Median duration of response was 5 months (4-11). Granulocytopenia was the major toxicity, with 47% of patients exhibiting grade 3 or 4 toxicity. Dose reduction and/or treatment delay was necessary in 28 patients (78%). Peripheral neuropathy reported in 10 patients was mild (grade 1 in 9 patients and grade 2 in 1 patient). In conclusion, single agent vinorelbine has moderate activity in recurrent or metastatic cervical cancer, but its reduced neurotoxicity warrants further study in combination with cisplatin.

Cisplatin, doxorubicin and ifosfamide in carcinosarcoma of the female genital tract. A phase II study of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Gynaecological Cancer Group (EORTC 55923).

Carcinosarcomas of the female genital tract are highly malignant tumours composed of carcinomatous and sarcomatous elements. In the past, these tumours were frequently treated as sarcomas. However, a number of arguments, including the sensitivity of these tumours to platinum-based chemotherapy, suggest that these tumours behave more like poorly differentiated carcinomas. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Gynaecological Cancer Group therefore decided to perform a prospective phase II study in patients with advanced or metastatic carcinosarcoma with an approach such as that used in gynaecological carcinomas. Eligible patients could have primary or recurrent disease, but prior radiotherapy or chemotherapy was not allowed. The treatment plan recommended upfront debulking, followed by chemotherapy with cisplatin, ifosfamide and doxorubicin. Patients who could be debulked to non-measurable disease remained eligible for the study, but the response assessment was restricted to patients who had measurable disease before the start of chemotherapy. A total of 48 patients (39 primary disease, 9 recurrent disease) were registered, 41 of them being eligible. In 9 patients, all macroscopic lesions could be removed, 32 patients were left with residual disease and were assessable for response. The overall response rate was 56%: a complete response (CR) was observed in 11 (34%) patients and partial response (PR) in 7 (22%) patients. No change occurred in 5 patients and progression in 2 patients. In 7 patients, response could not be assessed. Median survival for all of the 41 eligible patients was 26 months. Severe leucopenia and thrombocytopenia were common and necessitated dose reductions or delays in 60% of patients. From a clinical point of view, the most severe non-haematological toxicity was renal dysfunction, and one patient died of this complication in the absence of disease progression. The results of this study are in-line with the hypothesis that carcinosarcomas are chemosensitive, in particular for the currently investigated regimen. The treatment also included upfront cytoreduction when feasible. Considering the observed toxicities, alternative platinum-based regimens with more favourable toxicity profiles should be explored.

Dose-escalated paclitaxel in 1-hour infusion with a fixed dose of cisplatin in previously untreated advanced ovarian cancer: a phase II trial of the Spanish Group for Ovarian Cancer.

This phase II trial was planned to study the efficacy and toxicity of a fixed dose of cisplatin plus paclitaxel (Taxol; Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Princeton, NJ) given over 1 hour with intrapatient dose escalation. Patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer (stages IIB-IV); Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status < or = 2; normal renal, liver, and bone marrow function; and evaluable residual disease after debulking surgery were accrued. Paclitaxel was given over 1-hour infusion and dose was escalated from 175 to 200 and 225 mg/m2 if nadir neutrophil counts were > or = 1000/microL, platelets were > or = 100,000/microL, and neurotoxicity was less than grade 2. Cisplatin was given after paclitaxel at a fixed dose of 80 mg/m2. Six courses at 3-week intervals were planned. From May 1995 to August 1996, 68 patients were entered. Paclitaxel could not be escalated in six patients, another six received up to 200 mg/m2, and 45 received 225 mg/m2. Three hundred seventy-five courses were given: 27.7% at 175 mg/m2, 19.2% at 200 mg/m2, and 53.1% at 225 mg/m2. All patients were evaluable for toxicity, and 67 were evaluable for response. Thirty-five patients had a complete clinical response (51.4%), 20 had a partial response (29.4%), six had stable disease (8.9%), and six progressed on therapy (8.9%). Overall response rate was 80.8 (95% confidence interval, 71.3% to 90.1%). Second-look laparotomy was performed in 32 patients, and 20 of them (62.5%) had a pathologic complete remission. Grade 3 or 4 neutropenia was seen in 26 patients (38%), but only one had fever. Severe thrombocytopenia was not seen. Peripheral neurotoxicity (grade 1, 39.7%; grade 2, 42.6%; and grade 3, 8.8%) was dose-limiting. It is too early to report on time to progression and survival, and these data are not yet available. This combination of cisplatin with escalating doses of paclitaxel is feasible and very active, but the high incidence of peripheral neurotoxicity may limit its use.

A phase I/II study of paclitaxel plus cisplatin as first-line therapy for head and neck cancers: preliminary results.

Improved outcomes among patients with head and neck carcinomas require investigations of new drugs for induction therapy. Preliminary results of an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group study of single-agent paclitaxel (Taxol; Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Princeton, NJ) reported a 37% response rate in patients with head and neck cancer, and the paclitaxel/cisplatin combination has been used successfully and has significantly improved median response duration in ovarian cancer patients. We initiated a phase I/II trial to determine the response and toxicity of escalating paclitaxel doses combined with fixed-dose cisplatin with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor support in patients with untreated locally advanced inoperable head and neck carcinoma. To date, 23 men with a median age of 50 years and good performance status have entered the trial. Primary tumor sites were oropharynx, 10 patients; hypopharynx, four; larynx, two; oral cavity, three; unknown primary, two; and nasal cavity and parotid gland, one each. Of 20 patients evaluable for toxicity, four had stage III and 16 had stage IV disease. Treatment, given every 21 days for a maximum of three cycles, consisted of paclitaxel by 3-hour infusion followed the next day by a fixed dose of cisplatin (75 mg/m2). The dose levels incorporate escalating paclitaxel doses, and intrapatient escalations within a given dose level are permitted if toxicity permits. At the time of this writing, dose level 4 (260, 270, and 280 mg/m2) is being evaluated; three patients from this level are evaluable. With paclitaxel doses of 200 mg/m2 and higher, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor 5 micrograms/kg/d is given (days 4 through 12). Of 18 patients evaluable for response, seven (39%) achieved a complete response and six (33%) achieved a partial response. Three patients had no change and disease progressed in two. The overall response rate is 72%. Eleven responding patients had subsequent surgery/radiotherapy or radical radiotherapy. Two pathologic complete responses were observed in patients who had achieved clinical complete responses. Alopecia, paresthesias, and arthralgias/myalgias have occurred frequently, but with one exception (a grade 3 myalgia) they have been grade 1 or 2. No dose-limiting hematologic toxicity has been seen. Paclitaxel/cisplatin is an effective first-line regimen for locoregionally advanced head and neck cancer and continued study is warranted. Results thus far suggest no dose-response effect for paclitaxel doses above 200 mg/m2.

High-dose mitoxantrone and cyclophosphamide without stem cell support in high-risk and advanced solid tumors: a phase I trial.

This phase I study was designed to develop a high-dose combination of two cycles of mitoxantrone and cyclophosphamide in patients with solid tumors, as an alternative to single-cycle high-dose regimens that use only alkylating agents. Treatment was delivered with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF), but without stem cell support, in order to avoid potential tumor cell reinfusion. Thirty-one patients with advanced solid tumors received two cycles of high-dose mitoxantrone (20-30 mg/m2) plus high-dose cyclophosphamide (3000-4000 mg/m2). All patients received G-CSF until hematologic recovery. Dose-escalation was performed when less than 50% of cycles per level had dose-limiting toxicity (DLT). The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) achieved was mitoxantrone 25 mg/m2 and cyclophosphamide 4000 mg/m2. Main dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) were hematological: grade IV neutropenia lasting more than 7 days and thrombopenia below 20 x 10(9)/l requiring more than one platelet transfusion. Non-hematological DLT consisted predominantly of grade III emesis and asthenia. Follow-up after each cycle was performed in an outpatient setting and there were no toxic deaths. In conclusion, the administration of two cycles of high-dose mitoxantrone and cyclophosphamide with G-CSF support is safe and feasible. MTD was mitoxantrone 25 mg/m2 and cyclophosphamide 4000 mg/m2. Evaluation of this regimen is being done in a phase II trial.

Treatment of small cell lung cancer with a combination of VP16-213 and cyclophosphamide with cisplatin or radiotherapy.

Fifty five patients with small cell lung cancer with treated with VP16-213 combination chemotherapy regimen in two consecutive series. The first series included 24 patients; 10 with limited and 14 with extensive disease were treated with VP16-213, 120 mg/m2 p.o. daily for 5 consecutive days, Cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2 i.v. and Cisplatin 80 mg/m2 i.v. with hydratation and manitol induced diuresis. The cycle was repeated every 3 weeks. The second series included 31 similar patients, 16 limited, and 15 extensive disease, treated with VP16-213 at the same dose and Cyclophosphamide at 1,200 mg/m2 i.v. also repeated every 3 weeks; after three cycles the patients were treated with radiotherapy to the primary tumor and regional lymph nodes with 4,000 rads in a split course of three weeks interval, followed by the same combination chemotherapy. Response rate was 75% for the first series with 6 of 24 (25%) of complete responses in four limited and two extensive disease and a median survival time of 24 weeks. In the second series of patients there were 26 of 31 (83.8%) responses with 10 of 31 (32%) complete responses in nine limited and one extensive disease and a median survival time of 33 weeks for responders. Duration of response for complete responders was 36.8 weeks for the first series and 51 weeks for the second. Toxicity was mild and includes nausea and vomiting, myelosupression, alopecia in both series, with one toxic death in the second series. Both regimens are active with a low complete response rate, which was increased in the second series by the addition of radiotherapy, which did not increase overall survival.

[Adjuvant chemotherapy in the treatment of pharyngolaryngeal cancers in advanced stages]. / Tratamiento quimioterápico adyuvante en carcinomas laringo-faríngeos en estadios avanzados.

Since 1980 we use adjuvant chemotherapy in advanced laryngopharyngeal carcinomas. These cases were resectable and unresectable lesions with tumoral extent to the pharynx as a common characteristic. We analyze the survival of the first 50 cases treated with chemotherapy followed by: A) surgery and radiotherapy (36 cases) and B) radiotherapy alone (14 cases). Results of this not randomized study are compared with a historic group of advanced laryngopharyngeal carcinomas (T4/N+) treated with conventional therapy (surgery +/- radiotherapy). Response to chemotherapy was complete or partial (> 50% reduction) in 56 percent of the patients. There was improvement in overall survival and five-years disease-free survival in the latter group compared with those who did show any response (p < 0.01). We would point out that disease-free survival of the group A was better than historic group (60% vs 36%, p < 0.05), although these result should be carefully interpreted. Laryngeal preservation was achieved in 47 percent in the group A by modification of the initially scheduled radical surgery, in selected cases.

Safety and efficacy of metronomic non-pegylated liposomal encapsulated doxorubicin in heavily pretreated advanced breast cancer patients.

PURPOSE: Metronomic administration of the same chemotherapy agents (lower doses with closer intervals) may optimize their antiangiogenic properties. The aim of our study was to determine the efficacy and safety of a metronomic regimen based in non-pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (NPLD) in advanced breast cancer patients. METHODS: Clinical records of patients with pretreated advanced breast cancer and who were treated with the Metronomic-Cooper-type regimen consisting of weekly fixed doses of NPLD (30 mg IV) plus 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) (500 mg IV) plus vincristine (0.25 mg IV) and daily oral cyclophosphamide (50 mg) plus prednisone (20 mg) were reviewed. RESULTS: In 84 pretreated patients, a tumor response was observed in 38 patients (45 %); stable disease was observed in 23 patients (27 %). Median progression-free survival (PFS) time to progression was 8.4 months and median overall survival (OS) was 21 months. The most common grade 2-3 hematologic adverse event was neutropenia, which was observed in 47 patients (56 %). Febrile neutropenia was observed in 10 patients (12 %). The most common non-hematologic adverse events were asthenia and mucositis which were observed in 60 patients (71 %) and 26 patients (31 %), respectively. Three patients (4 %) experienced an asymptomatic decline of the left ventricular ejection fraction. CONCLUSIONS: NPLD-based metronomic regimen was effective and safe in pretreated advanced breast cancer patients. It could be considered as an appealing option to treat patients previously exposed to anthracyclines.

GEICO (Spanish Group for Investigation on Ovarian Cancer) treatment guidelines in ovarian cancer 2012.

In 2006, under the auspices of The Spanish Research Group for Ovarian Cancer (Spanish initials GEICO), the first "Treatment Guidelines in Ovarian Cancer" were developed and then published in Clinical and Translational Oncology by Poveda Velasco et al. (Clin Transl Oncol 9(5):308-316, 2007). Almost 6 years have elapsed and over this time, we have seen some important developments in the treatment of ovarian cancer. Significant changes were also introduced after the GCIG-sponsored 4th Consensus Conference on Ovarian Cancer by Stuart et al. (Int J Gynecol Cancer 21:750-755, 2011). So we decided to update the treatment guidelines in ovarian cancer and, with this objective, a group of investigators of the GEICO group met in February 2012. This study summarizes the presentations, discussions and evidence that were reviewed during the meeting and during further discussions of the manuscript.

Advanced ovarian cancer: phase III randomized study of sequential cisplatin-topotecan and carboplatin-paclitaxel vs carboplatin-paclitaxel.

BACKGROUND: Topotecan has single-agent activity in recurrent ovarian cancer. It was evaluated in a novel combination compared with standard frontline therapy. METHODS: Women aged 75 years or younger with newly diagnosed stage IIB or greater ovarian cancer, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status of 1 or less, were stratified by type of primary surgery and residual disease, treatment center, and age; then randomly assigned to one of the two 21-day intravenous regimens. Patients in arm 1 (n = 409) were administered four cycles of cisplatin 50 mg/m(2) on day 1 and topotecan 0.75 mg/m(2) on days 1-5, then four cycles of paclitaxel 175 mg/m(2) over 3 hours on day 1 followed by carboplatin (area under the curve = 5) on day 1. Patients in arm 2 (n = 410) were given paclitaxel plus carboplatin as in arm 1 for eight cycles. We compared progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival, and cancer antigen-125 normalization rates in the two treatment arms. A stratified log-rank test was used to assess the primary endpoint, PFS. All statistical tests were two-sided. RESULTS: A total of 819 patients were randomly assigned. At baseline, the median age of the patients was 57 years (range = 28-78); 81% had received debulking surgery, and of these, 55% had less than 1 cm residual disease; 66% of patients were stage III and 388 (47.4%) patients had measurable disease. After a median follow-up of 43 months, 650 patients had disease progression or died without documented progression and 406 had died. Patients in arm 1 had more hematological toxicity and hospitalizations than patients in arm 2; PFS was 14.6 months in arm 1 vs 16.2 months in arm 2 (hazard ratio = 1.10, 95% confidence interval = 0.94 to 1.28, P = .25). Among patients with elevated baseline cancer antigen-125, fewer in arm 1 than in arm 2 had levels return to normal by 3 months after random assignment (51.6% vs 63.3%, P = .007) CONCLUSIONS: Topotecan and cisplatin, followed by carboplatin and paclitaxel, were more toxic than carboplatin and paclitaxel alone, but without improved efficacy. Carboplatin plus paclitaxel remains the standard of care for advanced epithelial ovarian cancer.

Efficacy of fulvestrant in the treatment of postmenopausal women with endocrine-resistant advanced breast cancer in routine clinical practice

Introduction: This study aimed to describe the efficacy of fulvestrant 500 mg in postmenopausal women with estrogen receptor (ER)-positive advanced/metastatic breast cancer who had disease progression after receiving anti-estrogen therapy in clinical practice, getting real-world data. Materials and methods: Multicenter, retrospective, observational study conducted in Spain. Postmenopausal women with locally advanced/metastatic ER-positive breast cancer who received treatment with fulvestrant 500 mg after progression with a previous anti-estrogen therapy were eligible. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS); secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS), clinical benefit rate (CBR), duration of clinical benefit (DoCB), and safety profile. Results: A total of 263 women were evaluated (median age, 65.8 years). At a median follow-up of 21.5 months, median PFS and OS were 10.6 and 43.2 months, respectively. PFS according to 1st, 2nd, 3rd, and ≥ 4th lines were 11.5, 10.6, 9.9, and 8.5 months, respectively (p = 0.0245). PFS in patients with visceral involvement was 10 months vs 10.6 months in patients without visceral involvement (p = 0.6604), 9.6 months in patients with high Ki67 vs 10 months in patients with low Ki67 (p = 0.7224), and 10.2 months in HER2+ patients vs 10.3 months in HER2− patients (p = 0.6809). The CBR was 56.5% and the DoCB was 18.4 months. The most frequently adverse events were injection site pain (10.3%) and musculoskeletal disorders (7.6%). Conclusions: Fulvestrant 500 mg administered in clinical practice was shown to be effective (PFS, 10.6 months; CBR, 56.5%) and well tolerated, in accordance with previous trials

No disponible

CA15-3 and alkaline phosphatase as predictors for breast cancer recurrence: a combined analysis of seven International Breast Cancer Study Group trials.

BACKGROUND: We evaluated the ability of CA15-3 and alkaline phosphatase (ALP) to predict breast cancer recurrence. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data from seven International Breast Cancer Study Group trials were combined. The primary end point was relapse-free survival (RFS) (time from randomization to first breast cancer recurrence), and analyses included 3953 patients with one or more CA15-3 and ALP measurement during their RFS period. CA15-3 was considered abnormal if >30 U/ml or >50% higher than the first value recorded; ALP was recorded as normal, abnormal, or equivocal. Cox proportional hazards models with a time-varying indicator for abnormal CA15-3 and/or ALP were utilized. RESULTS: Overall, 784 patients (20%) had a recurrence, before which 274 (35%) had one or more abnormal CA15-3 and 35 (4%) had one or more abnormal ALP. Risk of recurrence increased by 30% for patients with abnormal CA15-3 [hazard ratio (HR) = 1.30; P = 0.0005], and by 4% for those with abnormal ALP (HR = 1.04; P = 0.82). Recurrence risk was greatest for patients with either (HR = 2.40; P < 0.0001) and with both (HR = 4.69; P < 0.0001) biomarkers abnormal. ALP better predicted liver recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: CA15-3 was better able to predict breast cancer recurrence than ALP, but use of both biomarkers together provided a better early indicator of recurrence. Whether routine use of these biomarkers improves overall survival remains an open question.