Comparing Resource Management Skills in a High- versus Low-Resource Simulation Scenario: A Pilot Study.

BACKGROUND: Low-resource environments, such as those found in humanitarian crises, pose significant challenges to the provision of proper medical treatment. While the lack of training of health providers to such settings has been well-acknowledged in literature, there has yet to be any scientific evidence for this phenomenon. METHODS: This pilot study utilized a randomized crossover experimental design to examine the effects of high- versus low-resource simulated scenarios of a resuscitation of a critically ill obstetric patient on a medical doctors' performance and inter-personal skills. Ten senior residents (fifth-year post-graduate) of the Maggiore Hospital School of Medicine (Novara, NO, Italy) were included in the study. RESULTS: Overall performance score for the high-resource setting was 5.2, as opposed to only 2.3 for the low-resource setting. The mean effect size for the overall score was 2.9 (95% CI, 1.7-4.0; P <.001). The results suggest a significant decrease in both technical (medical) and non-technical skills, such as leadership, problem solving, situation awareness, resource utilization, and communication in the low-resource environment setting. The latter finding is of special important since it was yet to be reported. CONCLUSIONS: This pilot study suggests that untrained physicians in low-resource environments may experience a considerable setback not only to their professional performance, but also to their interpersonal skills, when deployed ill-prepared to humanitarian missions. Consequently, this may endanger the health of local populations.

Residents working with Médecins Sans Frontières: training and pilot evaluation.

BACKGROUND: Well-prepared humanitarian workers are now more necessary than ever. Essential to the preparation process are: clearly defined learning objectives, curricula tailored to the nuances of humanitarian settings, simulation-based training, and evaluation. This manuscript describes a training program designed to prepare medical residents for their first field deployment with Médecins Sans Frontières and presents the results of a pilot assessment of its effectiveness. METHODS: The training was jointly developed by the Research Center in Emergency and Disaster Medicine- CRIMEDIM of the Università del Piemonte Orientale, Novara, Italy, and the humanitarian aid organization Médecins Sans Frontières- Italy (MSF-Italy); the following topics were covered: disaster medicine, public health, safety and security, infectious diseases, psychological support, communication, humanitarian law, leadership, and job-specific skills. It used a blended-learning approach consisting of a 3-month distance learning module; 1-week instructor-led coaching; and a field placement with MSF. We assessed its effectiveness using the first three levels of Kirkpatrick's training evaluation model. RESULTS: Eight residents took part in the evaluation. Four were residents in emergency medicine, 3 in anesthesia, and 1 in pediatrics; 3 of them were female and the median age was 31 years. Two residents were deployed in Pakistan, 1 in Afghanistan, 1 in the Democratic Republic of Congo, 1 in Iraq, 2 in Haiti and 1 on board of the MSF Mediterranean search & rescue ship. Mean deployment time was 3 months. The average median score for the overall course was 5 (excellent). There was a significant improvement in post-test multiple choice scores (p = 0.001) and in residents' overall performance scores (P = 0.000001). CONCLUSION: Residents were highly satisfied with the training program and their knowledge and skills improved as a result of participation. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study was approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee (date 24-02-2016, study code UPO.2015.4.10).

Cerebral nervous system vasculitis in a Covid-19 patient with pneumonia.

We describe a patient affected by Covid-19 acute respiratory distress syndrome with a cerebral nervous system vasculitis triggered by SARS-Cov-2, managed at the University hospital, in Novara, Italy in the area most impacted by the pandemic and where 749 Covid-19 positive patients were admitted from March 1st until April 25th, 2020.

Multiple withdrawals from single-use vials: a study on sterility.

BACKGROUND: Reutilization of single-use vials containing medical drugs is still under discussion. This practice has been adopted as a standard to avoid drug wastage, particularly in developing countries and in the aftermath of disasters. Some studies have assessed sterility of medications stored in single-use vials after utilization as multiple doses; however, most of these were limited to one single drug, included a low number of samples and did not consider an intermediate transfer step from the vial to a disposable syringe. The purpose of this study was to assess microbial contamination of samples withdrawn over three days from disposable syringes prepared from single-use vials. METHODS: A prospective sterility study was conducted. A total of 600 initial samples were prepared from six-hundred 10 mL single-use vials of physiological solution into six-hundred 20 mL disposable syringes. Samples were prepared in three different standard operating rooms, on six different days and by the same operator, using basic sterile technique. All syringes were capped, placed together in a non-sterile steel container, covered with a clean drape and stored in the refrigerator at 4°C under non-sterile conditions. Using basic sterile technique, four samples were withdrawn daily and cultured from each syringe over the next 3 days. Microbial growth was examined on Sabouraud agar and chocolate agar culture media. RESULTS: A total of 7200 samples were collected and 14,400 cultures were performed. No evidence of microbial growth in any of the culture media plates was found. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated that contents initially stored in single-use vials and subsequently transferred into disposable syringes in an operating room using sterile technique, maintain sterility after 4 withdrawals per day for a total of 3 days.

Evaluation of the risk factors associated with lipodystrophy development in a cohort of HIV-positive patients.

The prevalence of lipodystrophy in an HIV-infected population and the risk factors associated with body shape changes were analysed in this study. Five hundred and four subjects were included. Among these, 201 (39.9%) had features of lipodystrophy syndrome (cases); 303 (60.1%) constituted the control group. Compared with the control group, the lipodystrophy subjects were different in age (P = 0.01); duration of antiretroviral therapy (P < 0.001); length of exposure to nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) (P < 0.001) and to protease inhibitors (P < 0.001); nadir of CD4 cell count (P < 0.001); and value of plasma HIV-RNA before antiretroviral therapy (P = 0.008). In a multivariate analysis, length of therapy and a nadir CD4 cell count below 250 cell/microl were associated with an increased risk of lipodystrophy. Among patients with lipodystrophy, isolated fat loss was observed in 46 (23%); isolated fat accumulation in 40 (20%); mixed (loss and accumulation) syndrome in 50 (25%); and isolated metabolic changes in 65 (32%). Subjects with morphological alterations displayed a greater cumulative time of exposure to NRTIs and to protease inhibitors than patients with isolated metabolic alterations. Patients with lipoatrophy had had a greater exposure to stavudine.