Exploring the Impact of In Basket Metrics on the Adoption of a New Electronic Health Record System Among Specialists in a Tertiary Hospital in Alberta: Descriptive Study.

BACKGROUND: Health care organizations implement electronic health record (EHR) systems with the expectation of improved patient care and enhanced provider performance. However, while these technologies hold the potential to create improved care and system efficiencies, they can also lead to unintended negative consequences, such as patient safety issues, communication problems, and provider burnout. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to document metrics related to the In Basket communication hub (time in In Basket per day, time in In Basket per appointment, In Basket messages received per day, and turnaround time) of the EHR system implemented by Alberta Health Services, the province-wide health delivery system called Connect Care (Epic Systems). The objective was to identify how a newly implemented EHR system was used, the timing of its use, and the duration of use specifically related to In Basket activities. METHODS: A descriptive study was conducted. Due to the diversity of specialties, the providers were grouped into medical and surgical based on previous similar studies. The participants were further subgrouped based on their self-reported clinical full-time equivalent (FTE ) measure. This resulted in 3 subgroups for analysis: medical FTE <0.5, medical FTE >0.5, and surgical (all of whom reported FTE >0.5). The analysis was limited to outpatient clinical interactions and explicitly excluded inpatient activities. RESULTS: A total of 72 participants from 19 different specialties enrolled in this study. The providers had, on average, 8.31 appointments per day during the reporting periods. The providers received, on average, 21.93 messages per day, and they spent 7.61 minutes on average in the time in In Basket per day metric and 1.84 minutes on average in the time in In Basket per appointment metric. The time for the providers to mark messages as done (turnaround time) was on average 11.45 days during the reporting period. Although the surgical group had, on average, approximately twice as many appointments per scheduled day, they spent considerably less connected time (based on almost all time metrics) than the medical group. However, the surgical group took much longer than the medical group to mark messages as done (turnaround time). CONCLUSIONS: We observed a range of patterns with no consistent direction. There does not seem to be evidence of a "learning curve," which would have shown a consistent reduction in time spent on the system over time due to familiarity and experience. While this study does not show how the included metrics could be used as predictors of providers' satisfaction or feelings of burnout, the use trends could be used to start discussions about future Canadian studies needed in this area.

Effectiveness of home-based pulmonary rehabilitation programs for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD): systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Although pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) is considered a key component in managing chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients, uptake remains suboptimal. This systematic review aimed to determine the effectiveness of home-based PR (HBPR) programs for COPD patients. METHODS: A systematic review of scholarly literature published within the last 10 years from the conception of this project was conducted using internationally recognized guidelines. Search strategies were applied to electronic databases and clinical trial registries through March 2020 and updated in November 2021 to identify studies comparing HBPR with 'usual care' or outpatient pulmonary rehabilitation (OPR). To critically appraise randomized studies, the Cochrane Collaboration risk of bias tool (ROB) was used. The quality of non-randomized studies was evaluated using the ACROBAT-NRSI tool. The quality of evidence relating to key outcomes was assessed using Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE) on health-related quality of life (HRQoL), exacerbation frequencies, COPD-related hospital admissions, and program adherence. Three independent reviewers assessed methodologic quality and reviewed the studies. RESULTS: Twelve randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and 2 comparative observational studies were included. While considerable evidence relating to the effectiveness of HBPR programs for COPD patients exist, overall quality is low. There were no differences between HBPR and OPR in terms of safety, HRQoL, functional exercise capacity and health care resource utilization. Compared to usual care, functional exercise capacity seemed to significantly improve after HBPR. While patient compliance with HBPR is good, two factors appeared to increase the 'risk' of non-compliance: expectations of patients to 1) complete daily diaries/activity logs and 2) engage in solely unsupervised exercise sessions. CONCLUSION: The overall quality for most outcomes was low to very low; however, HBPR seems to offer comparable short-term benefits to OPR.

Effectiveness of remote home monitoring for patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD): systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Although remote home monitoring (RHM) has the capacity to prevent exacerbations in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), evidence regarding its effectiveness remains unclear. The objective of this study was to determine the effectiveness of RHM in patients with COPD. METHODS: A systematic review of the scholarly literature published within the last 10 years was conducted using internationally recognized guidelines. Search strategies were applied to several electronic databases and clinical trial registries through March 2020 to identify studies comparing RHM to 'no remote home monitoring' (no RHM) or comparing RHM with provider's feedback to RHM without feedback. To critically appraise the included randomized studies, the Cochrane Collaboration risk of bias tool (ROB) was used. The quality of included non-randomized interventional and comparative observational studies was evaluated using the ACROBAT-NRSI tool from the Cochrane Collaboration. The quality of evidence relating to key outcomes was assessed using Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE) on the following: health-related quality of life (HRQoL), patient experience and number of exacerbations, number of emergency room (ER) visits, COPD-related hospital admissions, and adherence as the proportion of patients who completed the study. Three independent reviewers assessed methodologic quality and reviewed the studies. RESULTS: Seventeen randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and two comparative observational studies were included in the review. The primary finding of this systematic review is that a considerable amount of evidence relating to the efficacy/effectiveness of RHM exists, but its quality is low. Although RHM is safe, it does not appear to improve HRQoL (regardless of the type of RHM), lung function or self-efficacy, or to reduce depression, anxiety, or healthcare resource utilization. The inclusion of regular feedback from providers may reduce COPD-related hospital admissions. Though adherence RHM remains unclear, both patient and provider satisfaction were high with the intervention. CONCLUSIONS: Although a considerable amount of evidence to the effectiveness of RHM exists, due to heterogeneity of care settings and the low-quality evidence, they should be interpreted with caution.

Health Insurance Exemptions for Older Ghanaians: Stakeholder Perspectives on Challenges Confronting an Ambitious Policy.

The health and wellbeing of older adults have taken center-stage in global policy agendas in recent times. In 2003, Ghana introduced an insurance exemption policy to eliminate financial barriers to healthcare for older adults and other vulnerable population groups. Embedded within the National Health Insurance Scheme (NHIS), this policy ostensibly guarantees free healthcare for older adults at publicly-funded facilities across the country. In this paper, we applied the implementation problem framework to identify gaps in the implementation of the exemptions policy and their impact on the healthcare experiences of older adults. Our data collection involved qualitative interviews with a purposive sample of community-residing older adults, health workers, community leaders, and policymakers. Our thematic data analysis identified resource, substantive, bureaucratic, political, and administrative constraints in the policy implementation process which, in turn, affected quality healthcare delivery. While most of these constraints are general challenges confronting the NHIS, they serve to undermine the intent of the scheme's exemptions policy. In particular, despite the exemptions, older adults continued to pay out-of-pocket for certain categories of treatments and medications, creating as yet financial barriers to healthcare. We present policy recommendations for addressing these implementation challenges, including suggestions to decentralize, depoliticize, and financially liberate the operations of the NHIS.

Ghana's health insurance scheme has not eliminated financial barriers to healthcare for older adults.Older Ghanaians reported unmet healthcare needs, despite implementation of health insurance.Resource, substantive, bureaucratic, and political constraints impede the policy implementation process.Measures are needed to decentralize and depoliticize the NHIS implementation process.

Defining the role of the public in Health Technology Assessment (HTA) and HTA-informed decision-making processes.

OBJECTIVES: The terminology used to describe community participation in Health Technology Assessment (HTA) is contested and frequently confusing. The terms patients, consumers, public, lay members, customers, users, citizens, and others have been variously used, sometimes interchangeably. Clarity in the use of terms and goals for including the different groups is needed to mitigate existing inconsistencies in the application of patient and public involvement (PPI) across HTA processes around the world. METHODS: We drew from a range of literature sources in order to conceptualize (i) an operational definition for the "public" and other stakeholders in the context of HTA and (ii) possible goals for their involvement. Draft definitions were tested and refined in an iterative consensus-building process with stakeholders from around the world. RESULTS: The goals, terminology, interests, and roles for PPI in HTA processes were clarified. The research provides rationales for why the role of the public should be distinguished from that of patients, their families, and caregivers. A definition for the public in the context of HTA was developed: A community member who holds the public interest and has no commercial, personal, or professional interest in the HTA process. CONCLUSIONS: There are two distinct aspects to the interests held by the public which should be explicitly included in the HTA process: the first lies in ensuring democratic accountability and the second in recognising the importance of including public values in decision making.

Capturing the Impact of Patient Portals Based on the Quadruple Aim and Benefits Evaluation Frameworks: Scoping Review.

BACKGROUND: Despite extensive and continuing research in the area of patient portals, measuring the impact of patient portals remains a convoluted process. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to explore what is known about patient portal evaluations and to provide recommendations for future endeavors. The focus is on mapping the measures used to assess the impact of patient portals on the dimensions of the Quadruple Aim (QA) framework and the Canada Health Infoway's Benefits Evaluation (BE) framework. METHODS: A scoping review was conducted using the methodological framework of Arksey and O'Malley. Reporting was guided by the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses) extension for scoping reviews. A systematic and comprehensive search was conducted using the Ovid platform, and the following databases were searched: Ovid MEDLINE (R) ALL (including epub ahead of print, in-process, and other nonindexed citations), EMBASE, and PsycINFO. CINAHL on the EBSCO platform and Web of Science were searched for studies published between March 2015 and June 2020. A systematic gray literature search was conducted using the Google search engine. Extracted data were tabulated based on a coding template developed to categorize the literature into themes and areas of interest. RESULTS: A total of 96 studies were included for data extraction. The studies were categorized based on the QA dimensions, with strict adherence to the definitions for each dimension. From the patients' perspective, it was determined that most evaluations focused on benefits and barriers to access, access to test results, medication adherence, condition management, medical notes, and secure messaging. From the population perspective, the evaluations focused on the increase in population outreach, decrease in disparities related to access to care services, and improvement in quality of care. From the health care workforce perspective, the evaluations focused on the impact of patients accessing medical records, impact on workflow, impact of bidirectional secure messaging, and virtual care. From the health system perspective, the evaluations focused on decreases in no-show appointments, impact on office visits and telephone calls, impact on admission and readmission rates and emergency department visits, and impact on health care use. Overall, 77 peer-reviewed studies were mapped on the expanded version of the BE framework. The mapping was performed using subdimensions to create a more precise representation of the areas that are currently explored when studying patient portals. Most of the studies evaluated more than one subdimension. CONCLUSIONS: The QA and BE frameworks provide guidance in identifying gaps in the current literature by providing a way to show how an impact was assessed. This study highlights the need to appropriately plan how the impact will be assessed and how the findings will be translated into effective adaptations.

Patient Portal Implementation and Uptake: Qualitative Comparative Case Study.

BACKGROUND: Giving patients access to their health information is a provincial and national goal, and it is critical to the delivery of patient-centered care. With this shift, patient portals have become more prevalent. In Alberta, the Alberta Health Services piloted a portal (MyChart). There was a need to identify factors that promoted the use of this portal. Furthermore, it was imperative to understand why there was variability in uptake within the various clinics that participated in the pilot. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to identify potential factors that could improve the uptake of MyChart from the perspectives of both users and nonusers at pilot sites. We focused on factors that promoted the use of MyChart along with related benefits and barriers to its use, with the intention that this information could be incorporated into the plan for its province-wide implementation. METHODS: A qualitative comparative case study was conducted to determine the feasibility, acceptability, and initial perceptions of users and to identify ways to increase uptake. Semistructured interviews were conducted with 56 participants (27 patients, 21 providers, 4 nonmedical staff, and 4 clinic managers) from 5 clinics. Patients were asked about the impact of MyChart on their health and health care. Providers were asked about the impact on the patient-provider relationship and workflow. Managers were asked about barriers to implementation. The interviews were recorded, transcribed verbatim, and entered into NVivo. A thematic analysis was used to analyze the data. RESULTS: Results from a comparison of factors related to uptake of MyChart in 5 clinics (2 clinics with high uptake, 1 with moderate uptake, 1 with low uptake, and 1 with no uptake) are reported. Some theoretical constructs in our study, such as intention to use, perceived value, similarity (novelty) of the technology, and patient health needs, were similar to findings published by other research teams. We also identified some new factors associated with uptake, including satisfaction or dissatisfaction with the current status quo, performance expectancy, facilitating conditions, behavioral intentions, and use behavior. All these factors had an impact on the level of uptake in each setting and created different opportunities for end users. CONCLUSIONS: There is limited research on factors that influence the uptake of patient portals. We identified some factors that were consistent with those reported by others but also several new factors that were associated with the update of MyChart, a new patient portal, in the clinics we studied. On the basis of our results, we posit that a shared understanding of the technology among patients, clinicians, and managers, along with dissatisfaction with nonportal-based communications, is foundational and must be addressed for patient portals to support improvements in care.

Tracing the Decisions That Shaped the Development of MyChart, an Electronic Patient Portal in Alberta, Canada: Historical Research Study.

BACKGROUND: Understanding how health organizations decide on information technology (IT) investments is imperative to ensure successful implementation and adoption. There is a high rate of failure and a tendency to downplay the complexity of implementation progression. Alberta Health Services introduced a patient portal called MyChart. Although MyChart allows patients to view appointments and selected laboratory results and to communicate with their providers, its uptake varies. OBJECTIVE: The study aimed to examine the institutional decision-making processes that shaped the development and implementation of MyChart. METHODS: A historical study was conducted based on the 7-step framework, where one engages in a rigorous archival critical analysis (including internal and external criticism) of documents and analysis of interviews. We reviewed and analyzed 423 primary and secondary sources and interviewed 10 key decision makers. RESULTS: Supportive leadership, project management, focused scope, appropriate technology and vendor selection, and quick decision making were some of the facilitators that allowed for the growth of proof of concept. The planning and implementation stages did not depend much on the technology itself but on the various actors who influenced the implementation by exerting power. The main barriers were lack of awareness about the technology, proper training, buy-in from diverse system leaders, and centralized government decision making. CONCLUSIONS: Organizational priorities and decision-making tactics influence IT investments, implementation, adoption, and outcomes. Future research could focus on improving the applicability of needs assessments and funding decisions to health care scenarios.

Robot-assisted coronary artery bypass surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies.

BACKGROUND: Robot-assisted coronary bypass (RCAB) surgery has been proposed as an alternative to conventional coronary artery bypass grafting (C-CABG) for managing coronary heart disease, but the evidence on its performance compared to other existing treatments is unclear. The aim of this study was to assess, through a systematic review of comparative studies, the safety and clinical effectiveness of RCAB compared to C-CABG and other minimally invasive approaches for the treatment of coronary heart disease. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review of primary studies in the English-language literature comparing RCAB to existing treatment options (C-CABG, minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass [MIDCAB] and port-access coronary artery bypass [PA-CAB]) following Cochrane Collaboration guidelines. Meta-analyses were performed where appropriate. RESULTS: We reviewed 13 studies: 11 primary studies of RCAB (v. C-CABG in 7, v. MIDCAB in 3 and v. PA-CAB in 1) and 2 multicentre database studies (RCAB v. non-RCAB). The overall quality of the evidence was low. Most studies showed no significant benefit of RCAB over other treatments in a majority of outcome variables. Meta-analyses showed that RCAB had lower rates of pneumonia or wound infection than C-CABG, and shorter intensive care unit length of stay than C-CABG or MIDCAB. Individual studies showed that RCAB had some better outcomes than C-CABG (ventilation time, transfusion, postoperative pain, hospital length of stay) or MIDCAB (transfusion, postoperative pain, time to return to normal activities, physical functioning and hospital length of stay). The review of the database studies showed that RCAB was statistically superior to non-RCAB approaches in postoperative pain, renal failure, transfusion, reoperation for bleeding, stroke and hospital length of stay; however, the difference between the 2 groups in several of these outcomes was small. CONCLUSION: Although the findings from this review of comparative studies of RCAB appear promising and suggest that RCAB may offer some benefits to patients, in the absence of randomized controlled trials, these results should be interpreted cautiously.

CONTEXTE: Le pontage aortocoronarien assisté par robot (PACAR) a été proposé comme solution de rechange au pontage aortocoronarien classique (PACC) pour la prise en charge des coronaropathies, mais on manque de données probantes claires comparant son efficacité à celle d'autres traitements. La présente étude visait à évaluer, dans le cadre d'une revue systématique d'études comparatives, la sûreté et l'efficacité clinique du PACAR, comparativement à celles du PACC et d'autres interventions à effraction minimale visant le traitement des coronaropathies. MÉTHODES: Nous avons réalisé une revue systématique d'études primaires publiées en anglais comparant le PACAR à d'autres options thérapeutiques (PACC, pontage aortocoronarien direct à effraction minimale [PACDEM] et pontage aortocoronarien par voie percutanée [PACVP]) selon les lignes directrices de la Collaboration Cochrane, et avons réalisé des méta-analyses lorsque c'était approprié. RÉSULTATS: Nous avons retenu 13 études : 11 études primaires sur le PACAR (comparativement à 7 études sur le PACC, à 3 études sur le PACDEM et à 1 étude sur le PACVP) et 2 études multicentriques fondées sur des bases de données (PACAR contre tout autre type de PAC). Dans l'ensemble, les données probantes étaient considérées de faible qualité. Selon la plupart des études, le PACAR ne présentait aucun avantage significatif par rapport aux autres traitements, et ce, pour la majorité des issues. Les méta-analyses ont montré que le PACAR était associé à des taux de pneumonie et d'infection de la plaie plus faibles que le PACC, de même qu'à une durée d'hospitalisation en soins intensifs plus courte que le PACC et le PACDEM. Des études individuelles ont montré que le PACAR donnait lieu à de meilleures issues pour certains paramètres que le PACC (temps de ventilation, besoin de transfusion, douleur postopératoire et durée d'hospitalisation) et que le PACDEM (besoin de transfusion, douleur postopératoire, temps nécessaire pour la reprise des activités normales, fonctionnement physique et durée d'hospitalisation). La revue des études fondées sur des bases de données a indiqué que le PACAR était supérieur, sur le plan statistique, aux autres types de PAC en ce qui a trait à la douleur postopératoire, à l'insuffisance rénale, au besoin de transfusion, à la réalisation d'une autre chirurgie en raison de saignements, à l'accident vasculaire cérébral et à la durée d'hospitalisation; cependant, pour plusieurs de ces paramètres, les différences entre les 2 groupes étaient petites. CONCLUSION: Bien que les résultats de cette revue d'études comparatives sur le PACAR semblent prometteurs et laissent penser que cette intervention comporte des avantages pour les patients, ils devraient être interprétés avec prudence étant donné l'absence d'études cliniques randomisées.

A checklist for managed access programmes for reimbursement co-designed by Canadian patients and caregivers.

INTRODUCTION: Reimbursement decisions on orphan drugs carry significant uncertainty, and as the amount increases, so does the risk of making a wrong decision, where harms outweigh benefits. Consequently, patients often face limited access to orphan drugs. Managed access programmes (MAPs) are a mechanism for managing risk while enabling access to potentially beneficial drugs. Patients and their caregivers have expressed support for these programmes and see patient input as critical to successful implementation. However, they have yet to be systematically involved in their design. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to co-design with patients and caregivers a tool for the development of managed access programmes. METHODS: Building upon established relationships with the Canadian Organization for Rare Disorders, the project team collaborated with patients and caregivers using the principles of participatory action research. Data were collected at two workshops and analysed using a thematic network approach. RESULTS: Patients and caregivers co-designed a checklist comprised of six aspects of an ideal MAP relating to accountability (programme goals); governance (MAP-specific committee oversight, patient input, international collaboration); and evidence collection (outcome measures and continuation criteria, on-going monitoring and registries). They recognized that health-care resources are finite and considered disease or drug eligibility criteria for deciding when to use a MAP (eg drugs treating diseases for which there are no other legitimate alternatives). CONCLUSIONS: A patient and caregiver-designed checklist was created, which emphasized patient involvement and transparency. Further research is needed to examine the feasibility of this checklist and roles for other stakeholders.

Palliative care in the home: a scoping review of study quality, primary outcomes, and thematic component analysis.

BACKGROUND: The aim of palliative care is to improve the quality of life of patients and families through the prevention and relief of suffering. Frequently, patients may choose to receive palliative care in the home. The objective of this paper is to summarize the quality and primary outcomes measured within the palliative care in the home literature. This will synthesize the current state of the literature and inform future work. METHODS: A scoping review was completed using PRISMA guidelines. PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, EconLit, PsycINFO, Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects, and National Health Service Economic Evaluation Database were searched from inception to August 2016. Inclusion criteria included: 1) care was provided in the "home of the patient" as defined by the study, 2) outcomes were reported, and 3) reported original data. Thematic component analysis was completed to categorize interventions. RESULTS: Fifty-three studies formed the final data set. The literature varied extensively. Five themes were identified: accessibility of healthcare, caregiver support, individualized patient centered care, multidisciplinary care provision, and quality improvement. Primary outcomes were resource use, symptom burden, quality of life, satisfaction, caregiver distress, place of death, cost analysis, or described experiences. The majority of studies were of moderate or unclear quality. CONCLUSIONS: There is robust literature of varying quality, assessing different components of palliative care in the home interventions, and measuring different outcomes. To be meaningful to patients, these interventions need to be consistently evaluated with outcomes that matter to patients. Future research could focus on reaching a consensus for outcomes to evaluate palliative care in the home interventions.

Challenges with implementing malaria rapid diagnostic tests at primary care facilities in a Ghanaian district: a qualitative study.

BACKGROUND: Rapid diagnostic Tests (RDTs) for malaria enable diagnostic testing at primary care facilities in resource-limited settings, where weak infrastructure limits the use of microscopy. In 2010, Ghana adopted a test-before-treat guideline for malaria, with RDT use promoted to facilitate diagnosis. Yet healthcare practitioners still treat febrile patients without testing, or despite negative malaria test results. Few studies have explored RDT implementation beyond the notions of provider or patient acceptability. The aim of this study was to identify the factors directly influencing malaria RDT implementation at primary care facilities in a Ghanaian district. METHODS: Qualitative interviews, focus groups and direct observations were conducted with 50 providers at six purposively selected primary care facilities in the Atwima-Nwabiagya district. Data were analysed thematically. RESULTS: RDT implementation was hampered by: (1) healthcare delivery constraints (weak supply chain, limited quality assurance and control, inadequate guideline emphasis, staffing limitations); (2) provider perceptions (entrenched case-management paradigms, limited preparedness for change); (3) social dynamics of care delivery (expected norms of provider-patient interaction, test affordability); and (4) limited provider engagement in policy processes leading to fragmented implementation of health sector reform. CONCLUSION: Limited health system capacity, socio-economic, political, and historical factors hampered malaria RDT implementation at primary care facilities in the study district. For effective RDT implementation providers must be: (1) adequately enabled through efficient allocation and management of essential healthcare commodities; (2) appropriately empowered with the requisite knowledge and skill through ongoing, effective professional development; and (3) actively engaged in policy dialogue to demystify socio-political misconceptions that hinder health sector reform policies from improving care delivery. Clear, consistent guideline emphasis, with complementary action to address deep-rooted provider concerns will build their confidence in, and promote uptake of recommended policies, practices, and technology for diagnosing malaria.

Incorporating patient preferences into clinical trial design: results of the opinions of patients on treatment implications of new studies (OPTIONS) project.

BACKGROUND: Traditionally, clinical outcomes comprising composite end points in cardiovascular trials are assigned equal weights in statistical analyses. However, the importance of weighting outcomes according to their relative severity is now recognized. This study aimed to elicit patients' perceptions of the importance of cardiovascular outcomes and treatment complications and compare them with those of clinicians. METHODS AND RESULTS: Interviewer-administered surveys, including rating, ranking, point-allocation and trade-off exercises, were conducted in 52 adults with confirmed coronary disease or previous myocardial infarction. Patients viewed "death" as the most severe cardiovascular outcome, followed by cardiogenic shock, congestive heart failure (CHF), and repeat myocardial infarction (re-MI), the same pattern observed in clinician responses in a previous study. Most patients were willing to accept a 3-fold increase in risk of systemic bleed (SB) or nonfatal intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) for a 20% reduction in risk of cardiogenic shock or 60% reduction in risk of CHF, but only a 2-fold increase in the risk of SB or ICH for a 20% reduction in risk of CHF or 60% reduction in risk of re-MI and no increase in risk of SB or ICH for a 20% reduction in risk of re-MI. Similar patterns were seen in a previous study of trade-offs in clinicians. CONCLUSIONS: Although patients' preferences appear to be comparable with those of clinicians, patients may be less willing than clinicians to tolerate potential treatment complications. The methods used in this study offer a feasible approach to incorporating patient preferences into cardiovascular trials and warrant further investigation in broader patient populations.

Assisted Reproductive Technologies in Alberta: An Economic Analysis to Inform Policy Decision-Making.

OBJECTIVE: Regulation and public funding of assisted reproductive technologies (ARTs) vary across the Canadian provinces. In Alberta, neither of these exists. We conducted this study to evaluate the cost effectiveness and budget impact of providing ARTs in Alberta under three different policy scenarios (a "restrictive" policy, a policy based on Quebec's model, and a "permissive" policy) in comparison with the status quo. METHODS: To predict the cost effectiveness and budget impact of three policy options for publicly funded ARTs in Alberta, we developed an economic model by combining a state transition Markov model and a decision tree. The primary outcome was cost per healthy singleton. Probabilistic and one-way sensitivity analyses were conducted. RESULTS: The restrictive policy was the most cost effective option for two subgroups of age (< 35 years and 35 to 39 years), while the Quebec policy option was most cost-effective for the ≥ 40 years subgroup. Budget impact analysis extending up to the age of 18 years for the children in the model showed the cost savings of $8.33 million for the restrictive policy for the < 35 years subgroup. For the ≥ 40 years subgroup, the Quebec policy option resulted in total cost savings of $3.75 million. Sensitivity analyses showed that the model results were robust. CONCLUSION: This economic modelling study shows that publicly funded and scientifically regulated ARTs could provide treatment access and save health care expenditures for the province.

Objectif : La réglementation et le financement public des techniques de procréation assistée (TPA) varient d'une province canadienne à l'autre. En Alberta, les TPA ne sont ni réglementées ni financées par les deniers publics. Nous avons mené cette étude dans le but d'évaluer la rentabilité de l'offre de TPA en Alberta et les effets d'une telle mesure sur le budget albertain en fonction de trois scénarios de politique différents (une politique « restrictive ¼, une politique fondée sur le modèle québécois et une politique « permissive ¼), par comparaison avec le statu quo. Méthodes : Pour prédire la rentabilité de ces trois options de politique (prévoyant l'offre de TPA financées par les deniers publics en Alberta) et leurs effets sur le budget provincial, nous avons élaboré un modèle économique en combinant un modèle Markov (transitions d'état) et un arbre décisionnel. Le coût par nouveau-né en santé issu d'une grossesse monofœtale constituait le critère d'évaluation principal. Des analyses simples de la variance en matière de sensibilité et des analyses probabilistes ont été menées. Résultats : La politique « restrictive ¼ a constitué l'option la plus rentable dans deux sous-groupes d'âge (< 35 ans et 35-39 ans), tandis que la politique fondée sur l'approche québécoise a constitué l'option la plus rentable dans le sous-groupe des ≥ 40 ans. L'analyse des effets sur le budget (jusqu'à ce que les enfants générés par le modèle ait atteint l'âge de 18 ans) a indiqué l'obtention d'économies de 8,33 millions de dollars pour ce qui est de la politique « restrictive ¼ dans le sous-groupe des < 35 ans. Dans le sous-groupe des ≥ 40 ans, l'option de la politique fondée sur l'approche québécoise a mené à l'obtention d'économies totales de 3,75 millions de dollars. Les analyses de la sensibilité ont indiqué que les résultats modélisés étaient robustes. Conclusion : Cette étude de modélisation économique indique que l'offre de TPA financées par les deniers publics et faisant l'objet d'une réglementation scientifique pourrait assurer l'accès au traitement et permettre l'obtention d'économies pour la province.

DEFINING ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR FUNDING POLICIES AROUND IN VITRO FERTILIZATION.

OBJECTIVES: This review aims to assess the state of the science around the potential impact of certain patient characteristics on the safety and effectiveness of in vitro fertilization (IVF). METHODS: Following Cochrane Collaboration guidelines and the PRISMA statement, a comprehensive systematic review of reviews and recent primary studies examining the impact of paternal age and maternal age, smoking, and body mass index (BMI) on the safety and effectiveness of IVF was performed. Papers, published between January 2007 and June 2014, were independently reviewed and critically appraised by two researchers using published quality assessment tools for reviews and primary studies. Due to heterogeneity across papers (different study designs and patient selection criteria), a qualitative analysis of extracted information was performed. RESULTS: Seventeen papers (ten systematic reviews and seven primary studies) were included. They comprised evidence from retrospective observational studies in which maternal age, BMI, and smoking status were explored as part of secondary analyses of larger studies. The majority of papers found that the likelihood of achieving a pregnancy was lower among women who were >40 years, had a BMI ≥ 25 and smoked. Advanced maternal age and BMI were also associated with higher rates of preterm birth and low birth weight. CONCLUSIONS: Based on available evidence, it may be appropriate to consider "maternal age" and "morbid obesity" in public funding policies that aim to maximize the effectiveness of IVF. However, given inconsistencies in the effect of smoking across different pregnancy-related outcomes, support for incorporating it into funding conditions appears weak.

Introduction of a new health technology into a provincial health system: A case study of insulin pump therapy.

Decisions on the introduction of new non-drug health technologies into healthcare are challenging. This article describes the introduction of insulin pump therapy for type 1 diabetes in Alberta, using an Access with Evidence Development (AED) approach. The organization and implementation of the AED, its current status, and lessons learned are described.

Diagnostic accuracy of level 3 portable sleep tests versus level 1 polysomnography for sleep-disordered breathing: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Greater awareness of sleep-disordered breathing and rising obesity rates have fueled demand for sleep studies. Sleep testing using level 3 portable devices may expedite diagnosis and reduce the costs associated with level 1 in-laboratory polysomnography. We sought to assess the diagnostic accuracy of level 3 testing compared with level 1 testing and to identify the appropriate patient population for each test. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies of level 3 versus level 1 sleep tests in adults with suspected sleep-disordered breathing. We searched 3 research databases and grey literature sources for studies that reported on diagnostic accuracy parameters or disease management after diagnosis. Two reviewers screened the search results, selected potentially relevant studies and extracted data. We used a bivariate mixed-effects binary regression model to estimate summary diagnostic accuracy parameters. RESULTS: We included 59 studies involving a total of 5026 evaluable patients (mostly patients suspected of having obstructive sleep apnea). Of these, 19 studies were included in the meta-analysis. The estimated area under the receiver operating characteristics curve was high, ranging between 0.85 and 0.99 across different levels of disease severity. Summary sensitivity ranged between 0.79 and 0.97, and summary specificity ranged between 0.60 and 0.93 across different apnea-hypopnea cut-offs. We saw no significant difference in the clinical management parameters between patients who underwent either test to receive their diagnosis. INTERPRETATION: Level 3 portable devices showed good diagnostic performance compared with level 1 sleep tests in adult patients with a high pretest probability of moderate to severe obstructive sleep apnea and no unstable comorbidities. For patients suspected of having other types of sleep-disordered breathing or sleep disorders not related to breathing, level 1 testing remains the reference standard.

Assessing the impact of deliberative processes on the views of participants: is it 'in one ear and out the other'?

BACKGROUND: Interest in citizens' juries for eliciting the views of the public to inform coverage decisions on new health technologies has grown. However, evaluative information, particularly regarding their short- and/or longer-term impact on participants' views is limited. As citizens' juries can be resource intensive, such information is required to make 'evidence-based' decisions about their use. OBJECTIVES: To assess the impact of citizens' juries on participants' preferences for the distribution of health care across populations over time. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Two citizens' juries, involving a different representative sample of the public, were held. Participants completed identical questionnaires before (T1), directly after (T2) and 6 weeks following the jury (T3). Questionnaires comprised rating, ranking and choice-based questions related to four characteristics of competing patient populations (age, current health, life expectancy without treatment and health gain resulting from an intervention). Semi-structured telephone interviews were also conducted to explore the impact of the jury on participants' distributive preferences. Changes in responses to the self-administered survey over the three time points were assessed quantitatively, while interview questions were analysed using qualitative techniques. RESULTS: No significant differences in responses to rating questions were observed. Pre/post-jury changes in the rankings of two factors were statistically significant in one of the juries. However, in both juries, T1-T2 changes in responses to several of the choice-based questions reached statistical significance. The number was lower between T2 and T3, suggesting that jurors retained their views. According to findings from the interviews, jurors' views changed or were clarified through participation in the jury. CONCLUSIONS: There appears to be evidence suggesting that the views of individuals who participate in citizens' juries change as a result of the experience, and those 'informed' views are sustained.

Barriers and facilitators to evidence-use in program management: a systematic review of the literature.

BACKGROUND: The use of evidence in decision-making at the program management level is a priority in health care organizations. The objective of this study was to identify potential barriers and facilitators experienced by managers to the use of evidence in program management within health care organizations. METHODS: The authors conducted a comprehensive search for published, peer-reviewed and grey literature that explores the use of evidence in program management. Two reviewers selected relevant studies from which data was extracted using a standard data abstraction form and tabulated for qualitative analysis. The results were summarized through narrative review. The quality of the included studies was assessed using published criteria for the critical appraisal of qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods research. RESULTS: Fourteen papers were included in the review. Barriers and facilitators were categorized into five main thematic areas: (1) Information, (2) Organization--Structure and Process, (3) Organization--Culture, (4) Individual, and (5) Interaction. CONCLUSION: This paper reviews the literature on barriers and facilitators to evidence-informed decision-making experienced by program management decision-makers within health care organizations. The multidimensional solutions required to promote evidence-informed program management can be developed through an understanding of the existing barriers and facilitators of evidence-use.

Assisted reproductive technologies (ARTs): evaluation of evidence to support public policy development.

Over the years, IVF/ICSI protocols have continued to evolve with efforts to improve outcomes. As a result, treatment success may be related to certain procedural factors, including number of embryos transferred and stage at which they are transferred. This review aims to assess the safety and effectiveness of IVF/ICSI in comparison to spontaneous conception and less invasive ARTs and the impact of procedure-related factors on the outcomes of IVF/ICSI in order to support the development of local clinical and policy guidance. Following Cochrane Collaboration guidelines and the PRISMA statement, a comprehensive systematic review of literature examining the impact of procedural characteristics on the safety or effectiveness of IVF/ICSI from 2007 to date was performed. 33 systematic reviews and 3 primary studies evaluating the impact of procedural differences, IVF/ICSI in comparison to less invasive ARTs, and ARTs in comparison to spontaneous conception were found. IVF was shown to offer significant benefits over no treatment and IUI in achieving pregnancy and live birth among couples with endometriosis or unexplained infertility. Frozen and blastocyst-stage embryo transfers were as effective as fresh and cleavage-stage embryo transfers, respectively. In comparison to single embryo transfer, double embryo transfer significantly increased pregnancy, live birth and multiple pregnancy/birth rates. IVF/ICSI was associated with more complications during pregnancy and delivery, and in infants compared to naturally conceived pregnancies, particularly when multiple embryo transfer was used. Frozen embryo transfer had fewer adverse events during pregnancy and delivery than fresh embryo transfer, and was at least as safe in terms of infant outcomes. The potential complications of IVF/ICSI may be minimized through procedural choices, but such choices often impact effectiveness. Thus, in developing clinical and policy guidance around IVF/ICSI, the risk-benefit trade-offs patients and providers are willing to accept must be carefully considered.