Benefits of a brief psychological intervention targeting fear of cancer recurrence in people at high risk of developing another melanoma: 12-month follow-up results of a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: People with melanoma want and need effective interventions for living with fear of cancer recurrence (FCR). OBJECTIVES: This study reports the 12-month outcomes of a brief, psychological intervention designed to reduce FCR in people at high risk of developing another primary melanoma compared with usual care. METHODS: In this two-arm randomized controlled trial, adults previously diagnosed with stage 0, I or II melanoma were randomly allocated to the intervention (n = 80) or control (usual care) arm (n = 84). The trial was registered with the Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry on 19 March 2013 (registration: ACTRN12613000304730). The intervention comprised a 76-page psychoeducational resource and three individually tailored, telephone-based sessions with a psychologist, scheduled at specific time points around participants' dermatological appointments. The primary outcome was the level of self-reported fear of new or recurrent melanoma assessed at 12 months postintervention using the severity subscale of the Fear of Cancer Recurrence Inventory. RESULTS: Compared with the control arm, the intervention group reported significantly lower FCR at 12 months postintervention; the between-group mean difference was -1·41 for FCR severity [95% confidence interval (CI) -2·6 to -0·2; P = 0·02] and -1·32 for FCR triggers (95% CI -2·6 to -0·02; P = 0·04). The odds ratio for FCR severity scores ≥13 (54% intervention, 63% control) was 0·59 (95% CI 0·30-1·14, P = 0·12). There were no differences between groups in secondary outcomes, such as anxiety, depression or health-related quality of life. CONCLUSIONS: The previously reported 6-month benefits of this brief, patient-centred psychological intervention in reducing FCR were found to continue 12 months postintervention, with no known adverse effects, supporting implementation as part of routine melanoma care.

Analysis of an electrical impedance spectroscopy system in short-term digital dermoscopy imaging of melanocytic lesions.

BACKGROUND: Electrical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) is a noninvasive diagnostic technique that measures tissue impedance. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effect of adding an EIS measurement at baseline to suspicious melanocytic lesions undergoing routine short-term sequential digital dermoscopy imaging (SDDI). METHODS: Patients presented with suspicious melanocytic lesions that were eligible for short-term SDDI (with no clear feature of melanoma on dermoscopy). EIS measurement was performed at the first visit following dermoscopic photography. Normally, an EIS score of ≥ 4 is considered positive; however, this protocol investigated a higher cut-off in combination with SDDI. When the EIS score was ≥ 7 the lesion was excised immediately owing to the high risk of melanoma. Lesions with a score < 7 were monitored with standard SDDI over a 3-month period. RESULTS: From a total of 160 lesions analysed, 128 of 154 benign lesions received an EIS score of 0-6, giving a specificity of the EIS method for the diagnosis of melanoma of 83·1% [95% confidence interval (CI) 76·3-88·7]. Five of the six melanomas found in this study had an EIS score ≥ 7, with a sensitivity for melanoma diagnosis of 83·3% (95% CI 35·9-99·6). When EIS 0-6 lesions were subsequently followed up with SDDI, one additional melanoma was detected (EIS = 6) giving a sensitivity for the diagnosis of melanoma overall of 100% (95% CI 54·1-100; six of six malignant melanomas excised) and a specificity of 69·5% (95% CI 61·5-76·6; 107 of 154 benign lesions not excised). CONCLUSIONS: If utilizing a protocol where an EIS score ≤ 3 requires no SDDI and ≥ 7 requires immediate excision, it reduced the need for SDDI by 46·9% (n = 75/160; 95% CI 39·0-54·9).

Dermoscopy and in vivo confocal microscopy are complementary techniques for diagnosis of difficult amelanotic and light-coloured skin lesions.

BACKGROUND: Amelanotic melanomas are often difficult to diagnose. OBJECTIVES: To find and test the best methods of diagnosis using dermoscopy and reflectance confocal microscopy (RCM) tools. METHODS: We selected consecutive, difficult-to-diagnose, light-coloured and amelanotic skin lesions from three centres (in Australia and Italy). Dermoscopy and RCM diagnostic utility were evaluated under blinded conditions utilizing 45 melanomas (16 in situ, 29 invasive), 68 naevi, 48 basal cell carcinomas (BCCs), 10 actinic keratoses, 10 squamous cell carcinomas (SCCs) and 13 other benign lesions. RESULTS: Sensitivity and specificity for melanoma with dermoscopy pattern analysis by two blinded observers and their 'confidence in diagnosis' were low. The amelanotic dermoscopy method had the highest sensitivity (83%) for a diagnosis of malignancy (melanoma, BCC or SCC), but specificity was only 18%. Multivariate analysis confirmed the utility of RCM features previously identified for the diagnosis of BCC and melanoma (highest odds ratio for melanoma: epidermal disarray, dark and/or round pagetoid cells). RCM sensitivity was 67% and 73% for melanoma and BCC diagnosis, respectively, and its specificity for nonmalignant lesion diagnosis was 56%. RCM reader confidence was higher than for dermoscopy; 84% of melanomas would have been biopsied and biopsy avoided in 47% of benign lesions. All melanomas misclassified by either dermoscopy or RCM were detected by the other tool. CONCLUSIONS: Dermoscopy and RCM represent complementary/synergistic methods for diagnosis of amelanotic/light-coloured skin lesions.

Clinical practice guidelines for identification, screening and follow-up of individuals at high risk of primary cutaneous melanoma: a systematic review.

Understanding how individuals at high-risk of primary cutaneous melanoma are best identified, screened and followed up will help optimize melanoma prevention strategies and clinical management. We conducted a systematic review of international clinical practice guidelines and documented the quality of supporting evidence for recommendations for clinical management of individuals at high risk of melanoma. Guidelines published between January 2000 and July 2014 were identified from a systematic search of Medline, Embase and four guideline databases; 34 guidelines from 20 countries were included. High-risk characteristics that were consistently reported included many melanocytic naevi, dysplastic naevi, family history, large congenital naevi, and Fitzpatrick Type I and II skin types. Most guidelines identify risk factors and recommend that individuals at high risk of cutaneous melanoma be monitored, but only half of the guidelines provide recommendations for screening based on level of risk. There is disagreement in screening and follow-up recommendations for those with an increased risk of future melanoma. High-level evidence supports long-term screening of individuals at high risk and monitoring using dermoscopy. Evidence is low for defining screening intervals and duration of follow-up, and for skin self-examination, although education about skin self-examination is widely encouraged. Clinical practice guidelines would benefit from a dedicated section for identification, screening and follow-up of individuals at high risk of melanoma. Guidelines could be improved with clear definitions of multiple naevi, family history and frequency of follow-up. Research examining the benefits and costs of alternative management strategies for groups at high risk will enhance the quality of recommendations.

Surveillance for treatment failure of lentigo maligna with dermoscopy and in vivo confocal microscopy: new descriptors.

BACKGROUND: Nonsurgical treatment (radiotherapy, imiquimod) is increasingly employed for the management of lentigo maligna (LM). While the diagnosis of LM remains difficult, the detection of treatment failure is even more challenging. OBJECTIVES: To describe the sensitivity and specificity for the diagnosis of LM of individual features and methods using dermoscopy and in vivo reflectance confocal microscopy (RCM) to aid in the detection of treatment failure of LM following nonsurgical treatment. METHODS: A retrospective study of dermoscopy and RCM images (blinded to the correlation with pathology) in patients with biopsy-confirmed LM who were undergoing nonsurgical treatment in two referral institutions - one in Sydney, Australia, and the other in Barcelona, Spain. Ninety-eight patients were treated nonsurgically for LM during the period 2006-2012. Thirty-one patients had abnormal dermoscopy or RCM evaluation, and had a biopsy that identified LM recurrence in 15 patients and nonmelanoma diagnoses in 16 patients (one Bowen disease, 15 solar changes). RESULTS: The diagnosis of treatment failure was difficult with dermoscopy, with a sensitivity of 80% and specificity of 56%, even with the interpretation of an expert. The best criterion was asymmetric hyperpigmented follicular openings, but this was present in only 47% of treatment failure LM. Isolated, very fine brown dots ('dust' appearance) correlated highly with the diagnosis of treatment failure LM (73% sensitivity and 88% specificity) and with pagetoid cells seen with RCM. The LM score, comprising six criteria, had a specificity of 94% and sensitivity of 100%. CONCLUSIONS: These methods and descriptors should help to manage the diagnosis of treatment failure.

Melanoma survivors at high risk of developing new primary disease: a qualitative examination of the factors that contribute to patient satisfaction with clinical care.

BACKGROUND: Providing ongoing clinical care that adequately addresses patients' medical, psychosocial and information needs is challenging, particularly for patient groups at increased risk of developing life-threatening disease such as malignant melanoma. This study examined a model of clinical care developed by the High Risk Clinic (HRC) of the Sydney Melanoma Diagnostic Centre in relation to patient satisfaction. METHODS: Semi-structured telephone interviews were conducted and analyzed using the framework of Miles and Huberman, and themes were organized using the qualitative software package, QSR NVivo8. RESULTS: Twenty HRC patients participated in the study (nine men, 11 women; mean age 57.6 years, age range 34-74 years; response rate 91%). Satisfaction with clinical care at the HRC was high. Factors contributing to patient satisfaction included: rapid and regular access to physicians who were perceived by participants as experts, the development of confidence and trust in one's treating doctor, and a sense of being cared about and understood by one's healthcare team. Although one-third of the participants reported some inconveniences in attending the clinic, these were viewed as minor difficulties and not significant barriers to care. Formal psychological support was not sought or expected by participants, although many expressed long-standing melanoma-related fears and concerns. CONCLUSIONS: Accessible, expert medical attention, delivered in a patient-centered manner was integral to melanoma survivors' satisfaction with clinical management. Appropriate referrals to psychological support may further increase satisfaction with clinical care.

Slow-growing melanoma: a dermoscopy follow-up study.

BACKGROUND: Recent evidence suggests that melanoma is a family of different tumours with varying abilities to grow and metastasize. Trends in melanoma epidemiology show a strong increase in the incidence of thin melanoma, with no corresponding increase in mortality or incidence of thick melanoma. We initially evaluated five cases and found that none had baseline features suggestive of melanoma; excision was performed based on slight changes visible only in side-by-side comparisons of dermoscopic images. OBJECTIVES: To assess the clinico-dermoscopic features and the growth patterns of melanomas that were excised after a follow-up of 1 year or more due to their inconspicuous features at the baseline consultation. METHODS: In a multicentre, retrospective study of histopathologically confirmed melanomas excised after follow-up, we analysed dermoscopic images obtained at the initial consultation and compared them with images obtained at the last follow-up consultation. Images were analysed and graded using standard algorithms and scored for changes in size, symmetrical or asymmetrical structural change, and development of new melanoma-specific criteria. An overall score reflecting the amount of change was calculated for each lesion. RESULTS: Our series consisted of 103 melanomas. After a median follow-up of 20 months, most lesions were still in situ or early invasive (median Breslow thickness of 0.48 mm), with only three lesions showing tumour thickness of 1 mm or more. The most frequent baseline characteristics were asymmetrical pigmentation (78.6% of lesions), reticular overall pattern (62.1%), and regression features (35.9%). Most melanomas (58.3%) showed minor to moderate changes over time, with < 2 mm size increase, with asymmetrical structural change, and without development of new melanoma-specific criteria. Major changes were visible only after a mean follow-up of 33 months. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides evidence for the existence of a subgroup of slow-growing melanomas, which may explain the increase in the incidence of thin melanoma, despite stable rates of thick melanoma and melanoma-associated mortality.

Impact of dermoscopy and short-term sequential digital dermoscopy imaging for the management of pigmented lesions in primary care: a sequential intervention trial.

BACKGROUND: Studies have shown the benign to malignant ratio of excised pigmented skin lesions is suboptimal in primary care. OBJECTIVES: To assess the impact of dermoscopy and short-term sequential digital dermoscopy imaging (SDDI) on the management of suspicious pigmented skin lesions by primary care physicians. METHODS: A total of 63 primary care physicians were trained in the use of dermoscopy and SDDI (interventions) and then recruited pigmented lesions requiring biopsy or referral in routine care by naked eye examination. They were then given a dermatoscope and the option of a SDDI instrument, and change of diagnosis and management was assessed. RESULTS: Following the use of the interventions on 374 lesions a total of 163 lesions (43.6%) were excised or referred, representing a reduction of 56.4%. Of the 323 lesions confirmed to be benign, 118 (36.5%) were excised or referred, leading to a reduction of 63.5% (P < 0.0005) in those requiring excision or referral. The baseline naked eye examination benign to melanoma ratio was 9.5 : 1 which decreased to 3.5 : 1 after the diagnostic interventions (P < 0.0005). Of the 42 malignant lesions included in the study (34 melanoma, six pigmented basal cell carcinoma and two Bowen disease) only one in situ melanoma was incorrectly managed (patient to return if changes occur) resulting in the correct management of 97.6% and 97.1% of malignant pigmented lesions and melanoma, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In a primary care setting the combination of dermoscopy and short-term SDDI reduces the excision or referral of benign pigmented lesions by more than half while nearly doubling the sensitivity for the diagnosis of melanoma.

Dermoscopy compared with naked eye examination for the diagnosis of primary melanoma: a meta-analysis of studies performed in a clinical setting.

BACKGROUND: Dermoscopy is a noninvasive technique that enables the clinician to perform direct microscopic examination of diagnostic features, not seen by the naked eye, in pigmented skin lesions. Diagnostic accuracy of dermoscopy has previously been assessed in meta-analyses including studies performed in experimental and clinical settings. OBJECTIVES: To assess the diagnostic accuracy of dermoscopy for the diagnosis of melanoma compared with naked eye examination by performing a meta-analysis exclusively on studies performed in a clinical setting. METHODS: We searched for publications from 1987 to January 2008 and found nine eligible studies. The selected studies compare diagnostic accuracy of dermoscopy with naked eye examination using a valid reference test on consecutive patients with a defined clinical presentation, performed in a clinical setting. Hierarchical summary receiver operator curve analysis was used to estimate the relative diagnostic accuracy for clinical examination with, and without, the use of dermoscopy. RESULTS: We found the relative diagnostic odds ratio for melanoma, for dermoscopy compared with naked eye examination, to be 15.6 [95% confidence interval (CI) 2.9-83.7, P = 0.016]; removal of two outlier studies changed this to 9.0 (95% CI 1.5-54.6, P = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Dermoscopy is more accurate than naked eye examination for the diagnosis of cutaneous melanoma in suspicious skin lesions when performed in the clinical setting.

Melanoma histological Breslow thickness predicted by 75-MHz ultrasonography.

BACKGROUND: Ultrasound at 20 MHz tends to overestimate melanoma Breslow thickness due to lymphocytic infiltration or naevus remnant. Objectives To determine the efficacy of 75-MHz ultrasound for estimating melanoma thickness and to assess its reliability to predict surgical requirement. METHODS: One hundred and twelve suspicious skin lesions were imaged prospectively with the 75-MHz ultrasound in A and B mode. This instrument has a penetration of 3 mm and a lateral resolution of 21 mum. Measurements were performed by two observers and the mean was compared with the histological Breslow thickness. RESULTS: Forty-five of 52 melanomas and 22 of 36 naevi had clear hypoechogenicity boundaries. The median histological Breslow thickness of melanomas was 0.4 mm and 22 were in situ. The median percentage error of the machine was 13% of the histological Breslow thickness, with a high correlation (Pearson's r = 0.908, P < 0.001). Measurement was highly reliable for invasive melanoma, even in the presence of lymphocytic infiltration or naevus. CONCLUSIONS: In this series, 75-MHz measurement was highly reliable for predicting invasive melanoma thickness.

Ultraviolet radiation-induced murine tumors produced in the absence of ultraviolet radiation-induced systemic tumor immunosuppression.

Using micro-UV-irradiation versus whole-dorsal irradiation for inducing cutaneous carcinomas in Skh:HRI mice and an assay for UV radiation (UVR)-induced systemic tumor immunosuppression, the dependence upon systemic immunosuppression for the growth of UVR-induced carcinomas was examined. Squamous cell carcinomas were produced by repeated microirradiation of 0.8-cm2 middorsal skin with xenon are solar-simulated UVR. These tumors were excised from tumor-bearing animals who 7 days later were inoculated ventrally with a cloned UVR-induced squamous cell carcinoma cell line, the T51/6. This cell line only grows in UVR-induced immunosuppressed Skh:HRI mice. In two separate experiments T51/6 inocula failed to grow significantly in the previously tumor-bearing animals (1 of 13) and in unirradiated mice (0 of 19), whereas it grew in 100% (15 of 15) of animals given a whole-dorsal subcarcinogenic UVR dose from a filtered fluorescent tube solar simulator. No sinecomitant immune response to the T51/6 was found in previously UVR-induced tumor-bearing animals. In contrast to whole-dorsal UVR-induced tumors, microirradiation-induced squamous cell carcinomas, whose original growth environment lacked UVR-induced systemic tumor immunosuppression, did not grow preferentially in mice given an immunosuppressive dose of UVR. However both the whole-dorsal and microirradiation-induced tumors were shown to be poorly antigenic, since they lacked preferential growth in athymic nude mice. These observations provide evidence that UVR-induced systemic tumor immunosuppression is not necessary for the production of UVR-induced tumors. However, it does cause a positive selection pressure during tumor formation, independent of the carcinogenic effect of UVR, which affects the transplantation biology of a tumor.

Protocol for a within-trial economic evaluation of a psychoeducational intervention tailored to people at high risk of developing a second or subsequent melanoma.

INTRODUCTION: Psychological support programmes are not currently funded for people with a history of melanoma. A major barrier to the implementation of effective psychological interventions in routine clinical care is a lack of cost-effectiveness data. This paper describes the planned economic evaluation alongside a randomised controlled trial of a psychoeducational intervention for people with a history of melanoma who are at high risk of developing new primary disease. METHOD AND ANALYSIS: The economic evaluation is a within-trial analysis to evaluate the incremental costs and health outcomes of a psychoeducational intervention compared to usual care from the perspective of the Australian healthcare system. Cost-effectiveness and cost-utility analyses will be conducted, providing estimates of the cost to reduce fear of melanoma recurrence and the cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained. Fear of melanoma recurrence will be measured using the Fear of Cancer Recurrence Inventory and preference-based quality of life measured using the Assessment of Quality of Life-8 Dimensions (AQoL-8D) instrument. The AQoL-8D will provide utilities for estimation of QALYs in the cost-utility analysis. Unit costs of health services and medicines will be taken from the Medicare Benefits Schedule and the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme national databases. Health outcomes, and health service and medication use will be collected at baseline, 6 and 12 months follow-up. The within-trial analysis will be conducted at 12 months, consistent with the end point of the trial. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Approval to conduct the study was granted by the Sydney Local Health District (RPAH zone) Ethics Review Committee (X13-0065 and HREC/13/RPAH/86), the Department of Health and Ageing Human Research Ethics Committee (21/2013), the University of Sydney Human Research Ethics Committee (2013/595), and the Australian Institute of Health and Welfare Ethics Committee (EO 2013/4/58). TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ACTRN12613000304730; Pre-results.

Doctors' recognition and management of melanoma patients' risk: An Australian population-based study.

BACKGROUND: Guidelines recommend that health professionals identify and manage individuals at high risk of developing melanoma, but there is limited population-based evidence demonstrating real-world practices. OBJECTIVE: A population-based, observational study was conducted in the state of New South Wales, Australia to determine doctors' knowledge of melanoma patients' risk and to identify factors associated with better identification and clinical management. METHODS: Data were analysed for 1889 patients with invasive, localised melanoma in the Melanoma Patterns of Care study. This study collected data on all melanoma diagnoses notified to the state's cancer registry during a 12-month period from 2006 to 2007, as well as questionnaire data from the doctors involved in their care. RESULTS: Three-quarters (74%) of patients had doctors who were aware of their risk factor status with respect to personal and family history of melanoma and the presence of many moles. Doctors working in general practice, skin cancer clinics and dermatology settings had better knowledge of patients' risk factors than plastic surgeons. Doctors were 15% more likely to know the family history of younger melanoma patients (<40years) than of those ≥80 years (95% confidence interval 4-26%). Early detection-related follow-up advice was more likely to be given to younger patients, by doctors aware of their patients' risk status, by doctors practising in plastic surgery, dermatology and skin cancer clinic settings, and by female doctors. CONCLUSION: Both patient-related and doctor-related factors were associated with doctors' recognition and management of melanoma patients' risk and could be the focus of strategies for improving care.

Complete regression of primary cutaneous malignant melanoma.

While partial spontaneous histopathological regression is a common finding in invasive primary melanoma, proven complete regression is rare, with only 33 cases having been documented. None of the patients in these reported cases had a biopsy specimen taken from the original lesion, which would unequivocally prove the diagnosis of complete regressing melanoma. Over 4 years, we saw a 62-year-old white man who refused treatment of a biopsy specimen-proved superficial spreading melanoma (Breslow thickness, 0.7 mm) that eventually regressed completely. A biopsy specimen confirmed complete histopathological regression. There was no clinical evidence of regional or distant metastases throughout the 4 years. To our knowledge, this is the first documented case of a biopsy specimen-proved primary melanoma completely regressing. We present sequential photographic documentation and review the literature about this phenomenon. While the prevalence of such an event is unknown, evidence is presented that it may be more common than previously thought.

The morphologic criteria of the pseudopod in surface microscopy.

BACKGROUND AND DESIGN: In vivo cutaneous surface microscopy (oil epiluminescence, dermatoscopy, and dermoscopy) has been shown to greatly enhance the clinical diagnosis of melanoma. The pseudopod is a morphologic feature seen on surface microscopy that corresponds to the radial growth of tumor in melanoma. While it is one of the most specific surface microscopic features of invasive melanoma, it has remained poorly defined. We studied 239 pigmented lesions, 80 melanomas (62 invasive and 18 in situ) and 159 randomly selected pigmented nonmelanomas. We photographed these lesions in vivo using immersion oil and a Heine Dermaphot camera (Heine Ltd, Herrsching, Germany). We then scored the lesions in a "blinded" fashion for the presence of pseudopods based on strictly defined morphologic criteria. RESULTS: We defined the morphologic criteria of the pseudopod. As defined, the pseudopod retained a 97% specificity and 23% sensitivity for invasive melanoma. No difference was seen in the mean Breslow thickness between melanomas with and without pseudopods. None of the in situ melanomas were observed to have pseudopods. CONCLUSION: We suggest morphologic criteria for a highly specific in vivo cutaneous surface microscopic feature of invasive melanoma, the pseudopod.

Frequency and morphologic characteristics of invasive melanomas lacking specific surface microscopic features.

OBJECTIVES: To create a simple diagnostic method for invasive melanoma with in vivo cutaneous surface microscopy (epiluminescence microscopy, dermoscopy, dermatoscopy) and to analyze the incidence and characteristics of those invasive melanomas that had no diagnostic features by means of hand-held surface microscopes. DESIGN: Pigmented skin lesions were photographed in vivo with the use of immersion oil. All were excised and reviewed for histological diagnosis. A training set of 62 invasive melanomas and 159 atypical nonmelanomas and a test set of 45 invasive melanomas and 119 atypical non-melanomas were used. Images from the training set were scored for 72 surface microscopic features. Those features with a low sensitivity (0%) and high specificity (> 85%) were used to create a simple diagnostic model for invasive melanoma. SETTING: All patients were recruited from the Sydney (Australia) Melanoma Unit (a primary case and referral center). PATIENTS: A random sample of patients whose lesions were excised, selected from a larger database. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Sensitivity and specificity of the model for diagnosis of invasive melanona. RESULTS: The model gave a sensitivity of 92% (98/107) and specificity of 71%. Of the 9 "featureless" melanomas the model failed to detect, 6 were pigmented and thin and had a pigment network. The other 3 were thicker, hypomelanotic lesions lacking a pigment network, some with prominent telangiectases, and all with only small areas of pigment. All featureless melanomas noted by the patients had a history of change in color, shape, or size. CONCLUSIONS: Surface microscopy does not allow 100% sensitivity in diagnosing invasive melanoma and therefore cannot be used as the sole indicator for excision. Clinical history is an important consideration when featureless lesions are diagnosed.

Short-term digital surface microscopic monitoring of atypical or changing melanocytic lesions.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the outcome of short-term digital surface microscopic monitoring of suspicious or changing atypical melanocytic lesions. DESIGN: Digital surface microscopic (oil epiluminescence microscopy, and dermoscopy) images of clinically melanocytic lesions were taken with a color calibrated 3 CCD video instrument. In general, lesions were moderately atypical, flat or only slightly raised, without a history of change or surface microscopic evidence of melanoma, or were mildly atypical lesions with a history of change. Lesions were monitored during a 2.5- to 4.5-month period (median, 3.0 months). With the exception of overall change in pigmentation consistent with that seen in surrounding skin (solar exposure changes), any morphologic change after monitoring was considered an indication to excise. SETTING: Sydney Melanoma Unit, Sydney, Australia (a referral center). PATIENTS: A consecutive sample of 318 lesions from 245 patients (aged 4-81 years). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Specificity for the diagnosis of melanoma. RESULTS: Of the 318 lesions, 81% remained unchanged. Of the 61 lesions that showed morphologic changes, 7 (11% of changed and 2% of total lesions) were found to be early melanoma (5 in situ and 2 invasive with a Breslow thickness of 0.25 mm and 0.28 mm, respectively). None of these melanomas developed any classic surface microscopic features of melanoma and therefore could be identified only by morphologic change. The specificity for the diagnosis of melanoma by means of short-term digital monitoring was 83%. CONCLUSION: On the assumption that all melanoma will change during the monitored period, surface microscopy digital monitoring is a useful adjunct for the management of melanocytic lesions.

Examination of the ability of people to identify early changes of melanoma in computer-altered pigmented skin lesions.

OBJECTIVES: To examine whether older people were less able to distinguish changes of melanoma than younger people, and to test whether an educational brochure illustrating changes of melanoma would increase their ability to detect the changes. DESIGN: Photographic images of pigmented skin lesions were altered using computer graphics software. Images of typical changes of melanoma were shown to groups of volunteers younger than 30 years (n = 52) and older than 45 years (n = 41). Short intervals (seconds) between viewing of the original and changed lesions were used to test ability to distinguish the changes, and longer intervals (29 and 60 days) were used to test their ability over more realistic intervals. All participants were randomized to receive an educational brochure (designed using the same technology) to evaluate whether this would assist in identifying early changes of melanoma. SETTING: A cross section of volunteers employed in a large semigovernment utility. INTERVENTION: An educational brochure that illustrated typical changes of melanoma. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Score of correct or incorrect detection of changed or unchanged skin lesions. RESULTS: Tests at short intervals showed that both age groups were able to detect early changes of melanoma but had poor ability to detect changes of melanoma at longer intervals. Repeated viewing of the original lesions enabled the participants to once more recognize the changes. Both groups had low ability to detect the appearance of new pigmented lesions. The educational brochure improved the ability of participants to detect change. CONCLUSIONS: The main difficulty people have in self-detection of melanoma is limited ability to recall the appearance of their skin. This ability did not differ between the age groups. Educational material that focused on change was effective in increasing the ability to detect changes over short intervals. Photographic records may be the most effective aid for detection of changes at longer intervals.

Surface microscopy of pigmented basal cell carcinoma.

OBJECTIVES: To describe the relevant morphologic features and to create a simple diagnostic method for pigmented basal cell carcinoma (BCC) using in vivo cutaneous surface microscopy (ie, dermoscopy, dermatoscopy, or oil epiluminescence microscopy). DESIGN: Pigmented skin lesions were photographed in vivo using immersion oil (surface microscopy). All pigmented skin lesions were excised and reviewed for histological diagnosis. Photographs of 142 pigmented BCCs, 142 invasive melanomas, and 142 benign pigmented skin lesions were randomly divided into 2 equally sized training and test sets. Images from the training set were scored for 45 surface microscopy features. From this a model was derived and tested on the independent test set. SETTING: All patients were recruited from the primary case and referral centers of the Sydney Melanoma Unit, Sydney, Australia, and the Skin and Cancer Unit, Skin and Cancer Associates, Plantation, Fla. PATIENTS: A random sample (selected from a larger database) of patients whose lesions were excised. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Sensitivity and specificity of the model for diagnosis of pigmented BCCs. RESULTS: The following model was created. For a pigmented BCC to be diagnosed it must not have the negative feature of a pigment network and must have 1 or more of the following 6 positive features: large gray-blue ovoid nests, multiple gray-blue globules, maple leaflike areas, spoke wheel areas, ulceration, and arborizing "treelike" telangiectasia. On an independent test set the model had a sensitivity of 97% for the diagnosis of pigmented BCCs and a specificity of 93% for the invasive melanoma set and 92% for the benign pigmented skin lesion set. CONCLUSION: A robust surface microscopy method is described that allows the diagnosis of pigmented BCCs from invasive melanomas and benign pigmented skin lesions. Arch Dermatol. 2000;136:1012-1016