International consensus on diagnosis and management of Dravet syndrome.

OBJECTIVE: This study was undertaken to gain consensus from experienced physicians and caregivers regarding optimal diagnosis and management of Dravet syndrome (DS), in the context of recently approved, DS-specific therapies and emerging disease-modifying treatments. METHODS: A core working group was convened consisting of six physicians with recognized expertise in DS and two representatives of the Dravet Syndrome Foundation. This core group summarized the current literature (focused on clinical presentation, comorbidities, maintenance and rescue therapies, and evolving disease-modifying therapies) and nominated the 31-member expert panel (ensuring international representation), which participated in two rounds of a Delphi process to gain consensus on diagnosis and management of DS. RESULTS: There was strong consensus that infants 2-15 months old, presenting with either a first prolonged hemiclonic seizure or first convulsive status epilepticus with fever or following vaccination, in the absence of another cause, should undergo genetic testing for DS. Panelists agreed on evolution of specific comorbidities with time, but less agreement was achieved on optimal management. There was also agreement on appropriate first- to third-line maintenance therapies, which included the newly approved agents. Whereas there was agreement for recommendation of disease-modifying therapies, if they are proven safe and efficacious for seizures and/or reduction of comorbidities, there was less consensus for when these should be started, with caregivers being more conservative than physicians. SIGNIFICANCE: This International DS Consensus, informed by both experienced global caregiver and physician voices, provides a strong overview of the impact of DS, therapeutic goals and optimal management strategies incorporating the recent therapeutic advances in DS, and evolving disease-modifying therapies.

COVID-19 vaccine in patients with Dravet syndrome: Observations and real-world experiences.

OBJECTIVE: Vaccination against the SARS-CoV-2 virus is a primary tool to combat the COVID-19 pandemic. However, vaccination is a common seizure trigger in individuals with Dravet syndrome (DS). Information surrounding COVID-19 vaccine side effects in patients with DS would aid caregivers and providers in decisions for and management of COVID-19 vaccination. METHODS: A survey was emailed to the Dravet Syndrome Foundation's Family Network and posted to the Dravet Parent & Caregiver Support Group on Facebook between May and August 2021. Deidentified information obtained included demographics and vaccination status for individuals with DS. Vaccine type, side effects, preventative measures, and changes in seizure activity following COVID-19 vaccination were recorded. For unvaccinated individuals, caregivers were asked about intent to vaccinate and reasons for their decision. RESULTS: Of 278 survey responses, 120 represented vaccinated individuals with DS (median age = 19.5 years), with 50% reporting no side effects from COVID-19 vaccination. Increased seizures following COVID-19 vaccination were reported in 16 individuals, but none had status epilepticus. Of the 158 individuals who had not received a COVID-19 vaccination, 37 were older than 12 years (i.e., eligible at time of study), and only six of these caregivers indicated intent to seek vaccination. The remaining 121 responses were caregivers to children younger than 12 years, 60 of whom indicated they would not seek COVID-19 vaccination when their child with DS became eligible. Reasons for vaccine hesitancy were fear of increased seizure activity and concerns about vaccine safety. SIGNIFICANCE: These results indicate COVID-19 vaccination is well tolerated by individuals with DS. One main reason for vaccine hesitancy was fear of increased seizure activity, which occurred in only 13% of vaccinated individuals, and none had status epilepticus. This study provides critical and reassuring insights for caregivers and health care providers making decisions about the safety of COVID-19 vaccinations for individuals with DS.

Impact of intellectual and developmental disability on quality-of-life priorities in adults with epilepsy.

OBJECTIVE: Adults living with intellectual and developmental disability (IDD) and epilepsy (IDD-E) face challenges in addition to those faced by the general population of adults with epilepsy, which may be associated with distinct priorities for improving health-related quality of life (HR-QOL). This study sought to (1) conduct a survey of HR-QOL priorities identified by adults with IDD-E and caregivers, and (2) perform an exploratory cross-sectional comparison to adults with epilepsy who do not have IDD. METHODS: This cross-sectional study recruited 65 adults with IDD-E and 134 adults with epilepsy without IDD and caregivers. Using a three-step development process, 256 items from existing quality-of-life scales recommended by the American Academy of Neurology (AAN) were rated by patients/caregivers for their importance as HR-QOL priorities. HR-QOL items identified as critical to the majority of the sample of adults with IDD-E were reported. Health-related quality of life priorities were compared between adults with IDD-E and adults with epilepsy without IDD. RESULTS: Health-related quality of life was significantly lower in adults with IDD-E. Health-related quality of life domains identified as critical priorities by adults with IDD-E included seizure burden, anti-seizure medication side effects, seizure unpredictability, and family impact. Priorities for improving HR-QOL differed between adults with and without IDD-E, with concerns about family impact, difficulty finding appropriate living conditions, inadequate assistance, and difficulty transitioning from pediatric-to-adult care valued significantly more among those with IDD-E. SIGNIFICANCE: Intellectual and developmental disability is an important determinant of HR-QOL among adults with epilepsy. We report HR-QOL priorities identified by adults with IDD-E and their caregivers. These results may help epilepsy clinicians and researchers develop tailored strategies to address priorities of the patient with IDD-E/caregiver community.

Barriers to transition from pediatric to adult care for patients with Dravet syndrome: A focus group study of caregivers.

Caregivers of individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities and epilepsy such as Dravet syndrome (DS) must navigate a complex web of state and community services through the transition from child-centered to adult-oriented healthcare. This study examined barriers to successful transition from the caregivers' perspective. Primary caregivers of teenagers or adults with DS who had contemplated or completed transition to adult care were eligible. A three-week, asynchronous, web-based focus group was conducted on Facebook. Data were analyzed in an iterative process based on a Grounded Theory approach. Participants reviewed findings for accuracy. Transition success was defined by how well it ensured adequate care for the child when caregivers became unable to provide it. Existing transition programs were described as "not for our kids." All caregivers reported that transition programs began too late. Challenges to identifying suitable providers were formidable, with 71% of adult patients still being seen by pediatric neurologists. Many adult physicians lacked a general knowledge of DS, yet caregivers perceived that adult physicians were unwilling to listen to caregivers, and few were comfortable accommodating patients with intellectual disabilities and challenging behaviors. Community programs often excluded patients with DS, and rural healthcare disparities created additional barriers. Analysis produced recommendations for improving the transition process including the creation of a certified Transition Navigator position in the clinical setting. The limitations of this focus group analysis include possible selection bias, but our study identified key issues and pathways to improve the transition process for patients with DS and their caregivers.

Psychosocial impact on siblings of patients with developmental and epileptic encephalopathies.

OBJECTIVE: Caring for children with developmental and epileptic encephalopathies (DEEs) places substantial demands on the entire family unit, including siblings. The Sibling Voices Survey assesses parental and sibling responses to questions designed to assess how children adapt to growing up with siblings with DEE. METHODS: Participants responded to 1 of 4 online, age- and role-specific surveys (9-12, 13-17, and ≥18-year-old [adult] siblings; parents responded with perceptions of their unaffected child's/children's feelings). Survey questions used visual analog scales, categorical responses, and free-form responses. RESULTS: Survey submissions (n = 248) included 128 parents and 120 siblings (9- to 12-year-olds, n = 24; 13- to 17-year-olds, n = 17; adults, n = 79). All groups identified home life as the most substantially affected area of their lives (71%-84%), compared with interactions at school (21%-32%) or with friends (28%-42%). The most difficult aspect across all sibling groups was "feeling worried/scared when their sibling has seizures" (58%-70%). Feeling "overly responsible" for the sibling was reported by most adult siblings (63%), 41% of 13- to 17-year-old siblings, and 34% of parents. Siblings reported more symptoms of depressed mood (e.g., "down/unhappy," 47%-62%) than their parents perceived them feeling (25%). Most sibling groups (29%-49%) reported more symptoms of anxious mood (e.g., "nightmares/bad dreams") than parents perceived (15%). Identification of potential helpful coping mechanisms varied by age group. Most respondents (68%-76%) reported positive aspects, including greater maturity and compassion. SIGNIFICANCE: The Sibling Voices Survey provided important insights into how DEE impacts siblings psychologically and socially. This study highlights the need for increased awareness among parents and healthcare providers to monitor siblings for potential signs of depressed or anxious mood, to provide proper support, and to decrease potential for negative long-term consequences.

Nonseizure consequences of Dravet syndrome, KCNQ2-DEE, KCNB1-DEE, Lennox-Gastaut syndrome, ESES: A functional framework.

RATIONALE: Developmental epilepsies and encephalopathies (DEEs) are characterized by many severe developmental impairments, which are not well-described. A functional framework could facilitate understanding of their nature and severity and guide the selection instruments to measure improvements in therapeutic trials. METHODS: An online survey administered through several parent-organized foundations utilized accepted functional classifications and questionnaires derived from common instruments to determine levels of mobility, fine motor, communication, and feeding functions. Statistical analyses focused on overall levels of function and across-group comparisons adjusted for age. RESULTS: From 6/2018 to 2/2020, 252 parents provided information for one or more functional domains. Median age was 7.2 years (interquartile range (IQR): 3.9 to 11.8), and 128 (51%) were females. DEE groups were Dravet syndrome (N = 72), KCNQ2-DEE (N = 80), KCNB1-DEE, (N = 33), Lennox-Gastaut syndrome (LGS; N = 26), electrographic status epilepticus in sleep (ESES; N = 15), and others (N = 26). Overall, functional hand grasp was absent in 48 (20%). Of children ≥2 years old, 60/214 (28%) could not walk independently, 85 (40%) were dependent on someone else for feeding, and 153 (73%) did not effectively communicate with unfamiliar people. Impairments entailing absence or near absence of independent function (profound impairment) were observed in 0, 1, 2, 3, and 4 domains for 58 (25%), 78 (34%), 40 (17%), 33 (14%), and 22 (10%) children, respectively. After adjustment for age, impairment levels varied substantially across DEE group for mobility (p < 0.0001), feeding (p < 0.0001), communication (p < 0.0001), hand grasp (p < 0.0001), and number of profoundly impaired domains (p < 0.0001). Three or four profoundly affected domains were reported in 44% of KCNQ2-DEE participants, followed by LGS (29%), KCNB1-DEE (27%), ESES (7%), and Dravet syndrome (6%). CONCLUSIONS: Many children with DEEs experience severe functional impairments, and few children have typical function. As precision therapies will emphasize nonseizures consequences of DEEs, understanding the nature of abilities and impairments will be critical to selecting appropriate outcome measures in therapeutic trials.

Dravet syndrome: Characteristics, comorbidities, and caregiver concerns.

The Dravet Syndrome Foundation (DSF) conducted the largest in-depth survey of parents and caregivers of patients with Dravet syndrome (DS) to date, in order to (1) identify top concerns among caregivers, (2) establish an approximate frequency of characteristics and comorbidities of DS beyond seizures, and (3) provide direction for clinicians and researchers looking to study the effects of DS on the patient and family unit. Two hundred fifty-six responses were received representing a patient age range of 9months to 32years with a median age group of 7-10years (IQR=8). In an open response, caregivers ranked speech/communication, impacts on siblings, and cognitive impairment as their top concerns after seizure control, and nearly two-thirds of caregivers reported having suffered from depression. Some characteristics of DS such as gait issues increased with patient age, while others, including photosensitivity, hypotonia, and ataxia, were present from a young age. Comorbidities such as sleep disturbances and cardiac abnormalities were more frequently reported than in previous studies and some (including bradycardia) were correlated with SCN1A mutation status. This survey supports the concept of Dravet syndrome as a disease of the central nervous system with far-reaching effects and highlights the importance of the patient voice in determining appropriate research objectives. While seizure frequency is a relatively well-understood objective, seizures represent only a portion of parent and caregiver concerns. Studying the characteristics of DS described herein may identify additional outcomes significant for research.

Caregiver-reported outcomes with real-world use of cannabidiol in Lennox-Gastaut syndrome and Dravet syndrome from the BECOME survey.

PURPOSE: Plant-derived highly purified cannabidiol (CBD) reduced the frequency of seizures associated with Lennox-Gastaut syndrome (LGS) and Dravet syndrome (DS) and improved the overall condition of patients in placebo-controlled phase 3 clinical trials. Anecdotal reports also suggest a positive effect on nonseizure outcomes. In this study, we aimed to identify, through a caregiver survey which nonseizure outcomes were most likely to change in these patients. METHODS: The BEhavior, COgnition, and More with Epidiolex® (BECOME) was a 20-minute, cross-sectional, online survey that was developed with extensive input from caregivers, healthcare professionals, and epilepsy researchers, and was based on questions from validated measures and previously published caregiver reports. US-based caregivers (from Jazz Pharmaceuticals patient/caregiver database) of people with LGS or DS who were treated with CBD (Epidiolex®, 100 mg/mL oral solution) for ≥3 months were asked to compare the past month to the period before CBD initiation and rate their impression of changes using symmetrical Likert scales. RESULTS: A total of 498 caregivers (97% parents) of patients with LGS (80%) or DS (20%) completed the survey. Mean (range) age of patients was 16 (1-73) years, and 52% were male. Patients were taking a median CBD dose of 14 mg/kg/d and median 4 concomitant antiseizure medications. A large proportion of respondents reported improvements in ≥1 survey question for all nonseizure-related domains: alertness, cognition, and executive function (85%); emotional functioning (82%); language and communication (79% in nonverbal patients and 74% in verbal); activities of daily living (51%); sleep (51%); and physical functioning (46%). Respondents reported improvements in seizure-related domains, including overall seizure frequency (85%), overall seizure severity (76%), seizure-free days per week for ≥1 seizure type (67%), and seizure freedom during the past month (16%). The majority of respondents who reported reduction in seizure frequency also reported improvements in nonseizure outcomes domains (51-80%). However, improvements in nonseizure outcomes (18-56%) were also reported in patients who either had no change or worsening of seizure frequency. CONCLUSIONS: This survey characterized and quantified caregiver impression of changes in the seizure and nonseizure outcomes in patients taking add-on CBD treatment. Overall, 93% of caregivers reported planning to continue CBD treatment, primarily because of reduced seizure burden but also because of improvements in nonseizure-related outcomes. Despite the limitations that are associated with a retrospective survey-based study design, these results support further evaluation of the effect of CBD treatment on nonseizure outcomes among patients with LGS or DS.

Sleep in Dravet syndrome: A parent-driven survey.

OBJECTIVES: To describe and quantify the nature and severity of sleep disruptions in young people with Dravet syndrome (DS) based upon parent report. METHODS: Qualitative review of available pediatric sleep instruments with parent members of the Dravet syndrome Foundation led to the design of a series of questions customized to DS and other severe epilepsies. The questionnaire was administered as part of an on-line survey that reflected specific sleep-related concerns of parents of children with severe epilepsy. RESULTS: 76 parent-respondents completed the survey for their children-participants. Children's median age was 7.5 years (IQR 4.7-15.3); 41 (54 %) were female. The majority of parents (70/76, 93 %) used some method to monitor children while sleeping; co-sleeping was the most common method (45/76, 59 %). Seizures disrupted sleep in 40/76 (53 %); 19(48 %) reported nocturnal seizures 3 or more nights per week. In addition, 58/76 (76 %) also reported non-seizure-related nocturnal awakenings with 30 reporting awakenings 3 or more nights affected per week. SIGNIFICANCE: Young people with Dravet syndrome have frequently disrupted sleep secondary to seizures and other factors. Co-sleeping practices, medication effects, enuresis during seizures and other factors are not considered on standard sleep questionnaires. Current findings highlight the frequency of epilepsy-specific concerns and lay groundwork for sleep measures more appropriate for this population.

Dravet syndrome: A quick transition guide for the adult neurologist.

INTRODUCTION: Dravet syndrome (DS) is still seen as a "pediatric disease", where patients receive excellent care in pediatric centers, but care is less than optimal in adult health care systems (HCS). This creates a barrier when young adults need to leave the family-centered pediatric system and enter the adult, patient-centered HCS. Here we create a guide to help with the transition from pediatric to adult for patients with DS. METHODS: Experts in Dravet syndrome flagged the main barriers in caring for adults with DS and created a 2-page transition summary guide based on their expertise and a literature review. RESULTS: The 2-page guide addresses: DS diagnosis in children and adults; clinical manifestations, including the differences in seizures types and frequencies between children and adults with DS; the natural history of intellectual disability, behavior, gait, motor disorders and dysautonomia; a review of optimal treatments (including medications not commonly used in adult epilepsy settings such as stiripentol and fenfluramine), as well as emergency seizure management; avoidance of triggers, preventive measures, and vaccine administration in adults with DS. CONCLUSION: Several young adults with DS are still followed by their child neurologist. This 2-page transition guide should help facilitate the transition of patients with DS to the adult HCS and should be given to families as well as adult health care providers that may not be familiar with DS.

Seizure burden in severe early-life epilepsy: Perspectives from parents.

OBJECTIVES: Seizure burden is typically measured by seizure frequency yet it entails more than seizure counts, especially for people with severe epilepsies and their caregivers. We aimed to characterize the multi-faceted nature of seizure burden in young people and their parents who are living with severe early-life epilepsies. METHODS: A one-day workshop and a series of teleconferences were held with parents of children with severe, refractory epilepsy of early-life origin and providers for children with epilepsy. The workshop sessions were structured as focus groups and aimed to identify components of seizure burden and their impact from the perspective of parents and providers. Data were gathered, organized, and refined during the workshop using an iterative 4-step process that drew upon grounded theory. RESULTS: Three primary components of seizure burden were identified: frequency, severity, and unpredictability, which was as important if not more important at times than frequency and severity. Caregivers noted that the impacts of seizures were experienced as acute-immediate consequences, longer-term consequences, and as chronic effects that develop and evolve over time. The severity of the child's neurological and medical status as well as where in the disease journey a family was represented additional contextual factors that influenced the experience of seizure burden. SIGNIFICANCE: Patient-reported and patient-centered outcomes are increasingly incorporated into the evaluation of treatment effectiveness. Without understanding how the disease creates burden for the patient (or family), it is difficult to know how to assess the impact of treatment. Our preliminary findings indicate seizure burden is a complex construct and unpredictability can be as important as frequency and severity.

Optimizing the Diagnosis and Management of Dravet Syndrome: Recommendations From a North American Consensus Panel.

OBJECTIVES: To establish standards for early, cost-effective, and accurate diagnosis; optimal therapies for seizures; and recommendations for evaluation and management of comorbidities for children and adults with Dravet syndrome, using a modified Delphi process. METHODS: An expert panel was convened comprising epileptologists with nationally recognized expertise in Dravet syndrome and parents of children with Dravet syndrome, whose experience and understanding was enhanced by their active roles in Dravet syndrome associations. Panelists were asked to base their responses to questions both on their clinical expertise and results of a literature review that was forwarded to each panelist. Three rounds of online questionnaires were conducted to identify areas of consensus and strength of that consensus, as well as areas of contention. RESULTS: The panel consisted of 13 physicians and five family members. Strong consensus was reached regarding typical clinical presentation of Dravet syndrome, range of electroencephalography and magnetic resonance imaging findings, need for genetic testing, critical information that should be conveyed to families at diagnosis, priorities for seizure control and typical degree of control, seizure triggers and recommendations for avoidance, first- and second-line therapies for seizures, requirement and indications for rescue therapy, specific recommendations for comorbidity screening, and need for family support. Consensus was not as strong regarding later therapies, including vagus nerve stimulation and callosotomy, and for specific therapies of associated comorbidities. Beyond the initial treatment with benzodiazepines and use of valproate, there was no consensus on the optimal in-hospital management of convulsive status epilepticus. CONCLUSIONS: We were able to identify areas where there was strong consensus that we hope will (1) inform health care providers on optimal diagnosis and management of patients with Dravet syndrome, (2) support reimbursement from insurance companies for genetic testing and Dravet syndrome-specific therapies, and (3) improve quality of life for patients with Dravet syndrome and their families by avoidance of unnecessary testing and provision of an early accurate diagnosis allowing optimal selection of therapeutic strategies.