Neoadjuvant chemotherapy alters the balance of effector to suppressor immune cells in advanced ovarian cancer.

BACKGROUND: At diagnosis, tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) are prognostic in epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). We recently demonstrated that neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) significantly increased stromal TILs. Here, we investigated the impact of NACT on immune subpopulations with a particular focus on the balance of immune-reactive to tolerant subpopulations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Tissue microarrays of EOC (145 pre-NACT, 139 post-NACT) were analyzed for CD3+, CD8+, FOXP3+, CD68+, and CD163+ by immunohistochemistry and CD4+ cells from deduction. Stromal TILs scored as percentage of stromal area, while intra-epithelial TILs scored as number of TILs in contact with tumor cells/HPF. Differences were evaluated by Wilcoxon or Chi square tests, Wilcoxon signed-rank for paired analyses, and cox model for PFS and OS. RESULTS: NACT significantly increased stromal CD3+ (p = 0.003) and CD8+ (p = 0.001) and intra-epithelial CD8+ (p = 0.022) and CD68+ (p = 0.0003) infiltration in unmatched samples and among paired samples for stromal CD3+ and CD8+. Neither CD3+, CD8+, CD4+, and CD68+ nor CD163+ expression correlated with outcome at diagnosis or post NACT. Using median value as a cut-off, high stromal CD8+/FOXP3+ ratio (HR = 0.59; p = 0.017) and high stromal CD3+/FOXP3+ ratio post NACT were associated with prolonged PFS (p = 0.0226). The more the balance shifted in favor of effector versus regulatory TILs, the better the survival. Similarly, high CD68+/CD163+ ratio post NACT improved PFS (p = 0.0445). CONCLUSION: NACT has a significant impact on the balance of immune-reactive to immune-tolerant subpopulations and a high ratio of CD8+/FOXP3+, CD3+/FOXP3+, and CD68+/CD163+ post NACT was significantly associated with improved outcomes. Whether this could select patients for immunotherapy in the post-operative setting should be investigated.

Distribution of novel immune-checkpoint targets in ovarian cancer tumor microenvironment: A dynamic landscape.

BACKGROUND: The disappointing activity of single agent immune-checkpoint inhibitors in epitherlial ovarian cancer (EOC) has been attributed in part to its unique tumor microenvironment (TME). IDO, PDL1, LAG3 and TIM3 have been implicated in the immunotolerance of EOC. We investigated the expression of these co-regulators, their change with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT), and their association with outcome. METHOD: We identified 98 patients with EOC treated with NACT and performed IDO, PDL1, LAG3 and TIM3 immunohistochemistry on samples obtained before and after NACT. The cut-off threshold to consider a positive sample was set at 5%. RESULTS: In our cohort, TIM3 was the most prevalent co-regulator, with more than 75% of the samples being TIM3 positive. In comparison, only 22%, 28% and 17% of the samples were considered IDO, PDL1 and LAG3 positive. More than half of ovarian tumors expressed 2, 3 or even all 4 co-inhibitory molecules. However, biomarkers were not correlated with each other. NACT had a marked impact on immune co-regulator expression with over 70% of patients showing a change in biomarker status from negative to positive or vice versa. There was no significant difference in the pattern of co-regulator expression between platinum-sensitive and resistant patients. Co-expression of multiple inhibitory molecules did not appear to affect overall and progression-free survival. CONCLUSION: TIM3 is the most abundant co-inhibitory molecule in OC and may represent an attractive target. In addition, OC frequently co-expressed 2 or more markers supporting ICI combinatorial approaches. Finally, NACT significantly altered the expression of immunosuppressive molecules suggesting that the choice of ICI combinations should be adapted to the composition of the post-NACT immune TME.

DNA damage response as a therapeutic target in gynecological cancers.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The proven activity of poly ADP ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitors in BRCA-mutated homologous recombination deficient (HRD) ovarian cancer has led to the availability to patients with ovarian cancer of the first targeted therapy with an associated predictive biomarker. Our focus has recently turned towards expanding the clinical utility of PARP inhibitors beyond BRCA mutated ovarian cancer, and to a search for novel targets within DNA damage response (DDR). RECENT FINDINGS: Early trials in unselected patients with ovarian cancer showed responses to PARP inhibition in BRCA-wildtype ovarian cancer, and recent genomic studies have demonstrated that germline or somatic aberrations in other homologous recombination genes are present in a significant proportion of ovarian cancers. In addition, PARP inhibition may be of value in molecularly defined subsets of endometrial or cervical cancers. Novel DDR inhibitors such as ATR, ATM, WEE1 or DNA-PK inhibitors are also being tested in patients. Finally, combinatorial strategies of DDR inhibitors with antiangiogenic agents, phosphoinositide 3-kinase inhibitors or immunotherapies may further increase therapeutic efficacy. SUMMARY: In the future, patients with gynaecological malignancies may be rationally selected for PARP inhibition on the basis of comprehensive evaluation of homologous recombination genomic alterations, or HRD assays. Furthermore, novel DDR inhibitors have the potential to expand the repertoire of therapeutic options available to these patients.

Stage I granulosa cell tumours: A management conundrum? Results of long-term follow up.

UNLABELLED: Optimal management of women with early stage granulosa cell tumours (GCT) presents a management conundrum - they have excellent prognosis but a third will relapse. Advances uncovering the molecular characteristics of GCT have not been matched by improvements in our understanding and treatment. METHODS: Stage I GCT patients referred to Auckland City Hospital (1955-2012) and Princess Margaret Cancer Centre (1992-2012) were identified. Baseline characteristics, histopathology and outcomes were recorded retrospectively. RESULTS: One hundred and sixty stage I GCT patients were identified with a median age of 49 years. Median follow-up was 7.0 years (range 0.1-44.2 years). Fifty-one patients (32%) relapsed with a median time to relapse (TTR) of 12.0 years (1.3-17.7 years) - 20 initial relapses occurred 10 years post-diagnosis. Higher relapse rates (43% vs. 24% p=0.02) and shorter TTR (10.2 vs. 16.2 years p=0.007) were seen with stage Ic versus stage Ia disease. Cyst rupture was associated with increased relapse (p=0.03). Surgery was the main therapeutic modality at relapse. Eighty six percent of patients received non-surgical management at least once post-relapse. Clinical benefit rate was 43% with chemotherapy, 61% with hormonal therapy and 86% with radiation. Five- and 10-year overall survival (OS) were 98.5 and 91.6%, respectively. Median OS was similar in patients with (24.3 years) and without relapse (22.3 years). CONCLUSION: Surgery remains fundamental at diagnosis and relapse. Caution should be exercised in recommending adjuvant chemotherapy at initial diagnosis given median OS was greater than 20 years even with relapse. Hormonal therapy at relapse appears encouraging but needs further assessment. Novel treatment strategies need exploration with international collaboration essential for this.

Changes in DNA Damage Response Markers with Treatment in Advanced Ovarian Cancer.

Ovarian cancer (OC) is sensitive to upfront chemotherapy, which is likely attributable to defects in DNA damage repair (DDR). Unfortunately, patients relapse and the evolution of DDR competency are poorly described. We examined the expression of proposed effectors in homologous recombination (HR: RAD51, ATM, FANCD2), error-prone non-homologous end-joining (NHEJ: 53BP1), and base excision repair pathways (BER: PAR and PARP1) in a cohort of sequential OC samples obtained at diagnosis, after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT), and/or at relapse from a total of 147 patients. Immunohistochemical (IHC) expression was quantified using the H-score (0-300), where H ≤ 10 defined negativity. Before NACT, a significant number of cases lacked the expression of some effectors: 60%, 60%, and 24% were PAR-, FANCD2-, or RAD51-negative, with a reassuringly similar proportion of negative biomarkers after NACT. In multivariate analysis, there was a poorer progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) for cases with competent HR at diagnosis (PRE-NACT 53BP1-/RAD51+, hazard ratio (HR) 3.13, p = 0.009 and HR 2.78, p = 0.024) and after NACT (POST-NACT FANCD2+/RAD51+ HR 1.89, p = 0.05 and HR 2.38, p = 0.02; POST-NACT PARP-1+/RAD51+ HR 1.79, p = 0.038 and HR 2.04, p = 0.034), reflecting proficient DNA repair. Overall, HR-competent tumors appeared to have a dismal prognosis in comparison with tumors utilizing NHEJ, as assessed either at baseline or post-NACT. Accurate knowledge of the HR status during treatment is clinically important for the efficient timing of platinum-based and targeted therapies with poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPi).

Effectiveness of dabrafenib in the treatment of patients with BRAF V600-mutated metastatic melanoma in a Named Patient Program.

Given the approval of dabrafenib in patients with BRAF-mutant metastatic melanoma, a better understanding of treatment patterns and clinical outcomes with dabrafenib in a clinical setting is warranted. We performed a retrospective chart review of patients who received dabrafenib in a compassionate use setting through the Named Patient Program (DESCRIBE I study) during December 2010-August 2013 in Europe, New Zealand and Australia. Of the 331 Named Patient Program patients included, the majority (95.8%) had stage IV disease at dabrafenib initiation and 39.9% had brain metastases (BMs). Dabrafenib was used first line in 67.7% of patients, and median treatment duration was 6.4 months. Dabrafenib was well tolerated. Common grade 2/3 adverse events were hyperkeratosis (7.6%), pyrexia/fever (6.6%), fatigue (5.1%), hand-foot syndrome (5.4%) and nausea (3.6%). Overall response rate was 45.9%, median progression-free survival was 5.2 months (95% confidence interval, 4.2-6.1 months), and median overall survival was 12.4 months (95% confidence interval, 10.2-15.0 months). In patients with known brain metastases (n = 132) versus patients without (n = 199), overall response rate was 42.4% versus 48.2%, progression-free survival was 3.9 months (95% confidence interval, 3.8-5.5 months) versus 5.9 months (95% confidence interval, 4.8-7.8 months) and overall survival was 9.5 months (95% confidence interval, 6.7-12.4 months) versus 15 months (95% confidence interval, 11.1-20.5 months), respectively. Safety and effectiveness of dabrafenib in patients with unresectable advanced BRAF V600-mutant melanoma treated in an Named Patient Program was similar to the clinical trial experience, demonstrating effectiveness of dabrafenib in a nontrial setting.