Cross-sectional study of the burden and determinants of non-medical and opportunity costs of accessing chronic disease care in rural Tanzania.

OBJECTIVES: Countries in sub-Saharan Africa are seeking to improve access to healthcare through health insurance. However, patients still bear non-medical costs and opportunity costs in terms of lost work days. The burden of these costs is particularly high for people with chronic diseases (CDs) who require regular healthcare. This study quantified the non-medical and opportunity costs faced by patients with CD in Tanzania and identified factors that drive these costs. METHODS: From November 2020 to January 2021, we conducted a cross-sectional patient survey at 35 healthcare facilities in rural Tanzania. Using the human capital approach to value the non-medical cost of seeking healthcare, we employed multilevel linear regression to analyse the impact of CDs and health insurance on non-medical costs and negative binomial regression to investigate the factors associated with opportunity costs of illness among patients with CDs. RESULTS: Among 1748 patients surveyed, 534 had at least one CD, 20% of which had comorbidities. Patients with CDs incurred significantly higher non-medical costs than other patients, with an average of US$2.79 (SD: 3.36) compared with US$2.03 (SD: 2.82). In addition, they incur a monthly illness-related opportunity cost of US$10.19 (US$0-59.34). Factors associated with higher non-medical costs included multimorbidities, hypertension, health insurance and seeking care at hospitals rather than other facilities. Patients seeking hypertension care at hospitals experienced 35% higher costs compared with those visiting other facilities. Additionally, patients with comorbidities, older age, less education and those requiring medication more frequently lost workdays. CONCLUSION: Outpatient care in Tanzania imposes considerable non-medical costs, particularly for people with CDs, besides illness-related opportunity costs. Despite having health insurance, patients with CDs who seek outpatient care in hospitals face higher financial burdens than other patients. Policies to improve the availability and quality of CD care in dispensaries and health centres could reduce these costs.

Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on type 2 diabetes care and factors associated with care disruption in Kenya and Tanzania.

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic affected healthcare delivery globally, impacting care access and delivery of essential services. OBJECTIVES: We investigated the pandemic's impact on care for patients with type 2 diabetes and factors associated with care disruption in Kenya and Tanzania. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted among adults diagnosed with diabetes pre-COVID-19. Data were collected in February-April 2022 reflecting experiences at two time-points, three months before and the three months most affected by the COVID-19 pandemic. A questionnaire captured data on blood glucose testing, changes in medication prescription and access, and healthcare provider access. RESULTS: We recruited 1000 participants (500/country). Diabetes care was disrupted in both countries, with 34.8% and 32.8% of the participants reporting change in place and frequency of testing in Kenya, respectively. In Tanzania, 12.4% and 17.8% reported changes in location and frequency of glucose testing, respectively. The number of health facility visits declined, 14.4% (p < 0.001) in Kenya and 5.6% (p = 0.001) in Tanzania. In Kenya, there was a higher likelihood of severe care disruption among insured patients (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.56, 95% confidence interval [CI][1.05-2.34]; p = 0.029) and a lower likelihood among patients residing in rural areas (aOR, 0.35[95%CI, 0.22-0.58]; p < 0.001). Tanzania had a lower likelihood of severe disruption among insured patients (aOR, 0.51[95%CI, 0.33-0.79]; p = 0.003) but higher likelihood among patients with low economic status (aOR, 1.81[95%CI, 1.14-2.88]; p = 0.011). CONCLUSIONS: COVID-19 disrupted diabetes care more in Kenya than Tanzania. Health systems and emergency preparedness should be strengthened to ensure continuity of service provision for patients with diabetes.

Main findings: The COVID-19 pandemic disrupted diabetes care in Kenya and Tanzania resulting in changes in place and frequency of blood glucose testing, medication prescribed (less oral hypoglycaemics and more insulin), fewer health facility visits and more difficulty accessing healthcare providers.Added knowledge: This study quantifies the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on diabetes care in Kenya and Tanzania, and describes the factors associated with care disruption in both countries.Global health impact for policy and action: Evidence on diabetes care disruption is useful in making plans and policies responsive to the needs of diabetes patients during pandemics or related emergency situations.

The Tools for Integrated Management of Childhood Illness (TIMCI) study protocol: a multi-country mixed-method evaluation of pulse oximetry and clinical decision support algorithms.

Effective and sustainable strategies are needed to address the burden of preventable deaths among children under-five in resource-constrained settings. The Tools for Integrated Management of Childhood Illness (TIMCI) project aims to support healthcare providers to identify and manage severe illness, whilst promoting resource stewardship, by introducing pulse oximetry and clinical decision support algorithms (CDSAs) to primary care facilities in India, Kenya, Senegal and Tanzania. Health impact is assessed through: a pragmatic parallel group, superiority cluster randomised controlled trial (RCT), with primary care facilities randomly allocated (1:1) in India to pulse oximetry or control, and (1:1:1) in Tanzania to pulse oximetry plus CDSA, pulse oximetry, or control; and through a quasi-experimental pre-post study in Kenya and Senegal. Devices are implemented with guidance and training, mentorship, and community engagement. Sociodemographic and clinical data are collected from caregivers and records of enrolled sick children aged 0-59 months at study facilities, with phone follow-up on Day 7 (and Day 28 in the RCT). The primary outcomes assessed for the RCT are severe complications (mortality and secondary hospitalisations) by Day 7 and primary hospitalisations (within 24 hours and with referral); and, for the pre-post study, referrals and antibiotic. Secondary outcomes on other aspects of health status, hypoxaemia, referral, follow-up and antimicrobial prescription are also evaluated. In all countries, embedded mixed-method studies further evaluate the effects of the intervention on care and care processes, implementation, cost and cost-effectiveness. Pilot and baseline studies started mid-2021, RCT and post-intervention mid-2022, with anticipated completion mid-2023 and first results late-2023. Study approval has been granted by all relevant institutional review boards, national and WHO ethical review committees. Findings will be shared with communities, healthcare providers, Ministries of Health and other local, national and international stakeholders to facilitate evidence-based decision-making on scale-up.Study registration: NCT04910750 and NCT05065320.

Pulse oximetry and clinical decision support algorithms show potential for supporting healthcare providers to identify and manage severe illness among children under-five attending primary care in resource-constrained settings, whilst promoting resource stewardship but scale-up has been hampered by evidence gaps.This study design article describes the largest scale evaluation of these interventions to date, the results of which will inform country- and global-level policy and planning .