Rapid Tuberculosis Diagnostics Including Molecular First- and Second-Line Resistance Testing Based on a Novel Microfluidic DNA Extraction Cartridge.

Xpert MTB/RIF testing has improved tuberculosis (TB) diagnostics and rifampicin (Rif) resistance testing worldwide. However, it has weaknesses, such as its restriction to Rif resistance testing and the inability to use extracted DNA for further testing. Herein, a holistic diagnostic workflow, including TB detection and resistance testing toward Rif, isoniazid, and important second-line drugs (SLDs), based on a novel microfluidic DNA extraction cartridge (TB-Disk), is presented. DNA from 73 precharacterized sputum samples was extracted with TB-Disk, including 45 clinical and bacteriologically confirmed TB samples, nine TB-negative samples, and 19 sputum samples spiked with twofold dilutions of TB bacteria. The extracted DNA was subjected to further testing with FluoroType MTB (FT-MTB), GenoType MTBDRplus (GT-plus), and GenoType MTBDRsl. A total of 100% (20/20) and 72% (18/25) of smear-positive and smear-negative TB samples were identified as Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex positive. A total of 79% (33/42) of subsequently GT-plus tested samples yielded a valid result. Eight samples were identified as multidrug-resistant TB by GT-plus and further tested for resistance toward SLDs using GenoType MTBDRsl, yielding 75% (6/8) valid results. FT-MTB with cartridge-based DNA extraction (Disk-DNA) and DNA extracted with FluoroLyse yielded similar analytical sensitivities. FT-MTB with Disk-DNA was 100% specific. TB-Disk in combination with FT-MTB enables sensitive TB detection. The Disk-DNA can be further used for screening resistance toward first-line drugs and SLDs.

Clinical Evaluation of BD MAX MDR-TB Assay for Direct Detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis Complex and Resistance Markers.

BD MAX MDR-TB assay is a new molecular platform for the detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex (MTBC) in clinical specimens and simultaneous detection of resistance toward isoniazid and rifampicin. This study assessed the assay's diagnostic accuracy by using pre-characterized MTBC culture-negative (n = 257), smear-negative/MTBC culture-positive (n = 93), and smear-positive/MTBC culture-positive (n = 153) respiratory specimens. Compared with culture, the overall sensitivity and specificity of BD MAX MDR-TB were 86.6% and 100%, respectively; sensitivities for smear-positive and smear-negative samples were 100% and 64.5%. Sensitivity and specificity for isoniazid and rifampicin resistance were 58.3% (biased low due to sample collection strategy in low prevalence setting), 99.3%, 100%, and 98.2%, compared with phenotypic drug resistance testing and 100%, 99.4%, 100%, and 99.4%, compared with GenoType MTBDRplus. In conclusion, BD MAX MDR-TB is an accurate assay for the diagnostic detection of MTBC in respiratory samples and its resistance toward the most important anti-TB drugs isoniazid and rifampicin. Due to its medium to high throughput, good validity, and ease of use, the assay will be of great benefit for medium-sized to large TB diagnostic centers.

A pre-clinical validation plan to evaluate analytical sensitivities of molecular diagnostics such as BD MAX MDR-TB, Xpert MTB/Rif Ultra and FluoroType MTB.

Rapid diagnosis of tuberculosis (TB) and antibiotic resistances are imperative to initiate effective treatment and to stop transmission of the disease. A new generation of more sensitive, automated molecular TB diagnostic tests has been recently launched giving microbiologists more choice between several assays with the potential to detect resistance markers for rifampicin and isoniazid. In this study, we determined analytical sensitivities as 95% limits of detection (LoD95) for Xpert MTB/Rif Ultra (XP-Ultra) and BD-MAX MDR-TB (BD-MAX) as two representatives of the new test generation, in comparison to the conventional FluoroType MTB (FT-MTB). Test matrices used were physiological saline solution, human and a mucin-based artificial sputum (MUCAS) each spiked with Mycobacterium tuberculosis in declining culture- and qPCR-controlled concentrations. With BD-MAX, XP-Ultra, and FT-MTB, we measured LoD95TB values of 2.1 cfu/ml (CI95%: 0.9-23.3), 3.1 cfu/ml (CI95%: 1.2-88.9), and 52.1 cfu/ml (CI95%: 16.7-664.4) in human sputum; of 6.3 cfu/ml (CI95%: 2.9-31.8), 1.5 cfu/ml (CI95%: 0.7-5.0), and 30.4 cfu/ml (CI95%: 17.4-60.7) in MUCAS; and of 2.3 cfu/ml (CI95%: 1.1-12.0), 11.5 cfu/ml (CI95%: 5.6-47.3), and 129.1 cfu/ml (CI95%: 82.8-273.8) in saline solution, respectively. LoD95 of resistance markers were 9 to 48 times higher compared to LoD95TB. BD-MAX and XP-Ultra have an equal and significantly increased analytical sensitivity compared to conventional tests. MUCAS resembled human sputum, while both yielded significantly different results than normal saline. MUCAS proved to be suitable for quality control of PCR assays for TB diagnostics.