Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
1.
J Vasc Surg ; 69(5): 1471-1481, 2019 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30635157

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Increasing evidence suggests that urgent carotid intervention after a nondisabling stroke is safe. However, the functional outcome of such patients has not been quantified for various degrees of stroke. We aimed to determine whether increased presenting stroke severity and timing to intervention are associated with poor functional outcomes in patients undergoing urgent carotid endarterectomy (CEA) or carotid artery stenting (CAS) after an acute transient ischemic attack or stroke. METHODS: We reviewed all urgent carotid interventions from January 2013 through April 2017 at a single tertiary referral center. Preoperative variables analyzed included admission stroke severity, calculated by National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS). The primary end point was the patient's neurologic functional independence at discharge, quantified by the modified Rankin scale (mRS) score (≤2, functionally independent; ≥3, dependent). Primary complications were defined as new or worsened stroke, intracranial hemorrhage, and death. RESULTS: A total of 120 urgent carotid interventions (CEA, n = 96; CAS, n = 22; 1 CEA with middle cerebral artery aspiration thrombectomy and 1 carotid embolectomy) were performed. Bivariate analysis demonstrated a correlation between admission NIHSS score and mRS score when patients were divided into groups with an admission NIHSS score ≤10 and >10 (P = .0029). Patients presenting with larger strokes (NIHSS score >10) were 3.4 times more likely (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.2-9.6; P = .024) to have functional dependence (mRS score ≥3) at discharge than patients presenting with minor to moderate strokes (NIHSS score ≤10). Patients undergoing CEA or CAS before 48 hours were also associated with a worse discharge mRS score compared with those undergoing carotid interventions after 48 hours (odds ratio, 3.5; 95% CI, 1.4-8.7; P = .007). Even when emergent carotid interventions were excluded from the subgroup of patients undergoing CEA or CAS within 48 hours, discharge mRS correlated with time to procedure (days 1- 2 compared with >2 days). The odds of having discharge functional dependence (mRS score ≥3) were 3.4 times more likely for patients with the procedure performed at 1 to 2 days compared with >2 days (95% CI, 1.3-9.1; P = .014). CONCLUSIONS: Urgent carotid intervention performed in patients with moderate or severe strokes (NIHSS score >10) and before 48 hours is associated with functional dependence (mRS score ≥3) on hospital discharge. By demonstrating a clear correlation between admission NIHSS score and interval time to procedure with independent neurologic functional outcomes, these data aid in clinical decision-making for this high-risk subpopulation of patients who present with acute symptomatic carotid lesions.


Asunto(s)
Estenosis Carotídea/terapia , Endarterectomía Carotidea , Procedimientos Endovasculares , Ataque Isquémico Transitorio/etiología , Accidente Cerebrovascular/etiología , Tiempo de Tratamiento , Actividades Cotidianas , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estenosis Carotídea/complicaciones , Estenosis Carotídea/diagnóstico por imagen , Toma de Decisiones Clínicas , Evaluación de la Discapacidad , Endarterectomía Carotidea/efectos adversos , Endarterectomía Carotidea/mortalidad , Procedimientos Endovasculares/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Endovasculares/instrumentación , Procedimientos Endovasculares/mortalidad , Femenino , Estado de Salud , Humanos , Ataque Isquémico Transitorio/diagnóstico , Ataque Isquémico Transitorio/terapia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Selección de Paciente , Recuperación de la Función , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Stents , Accidente Cerebrovascular/diagnóstico , Accidente Cerebrovascular/terapia , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento
2.
Am Surg ; 80(9): 841-3, 2014 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25197865

RESUMEN

Pediatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network (PECARN) guidelines have a near 100 per cent negative predictive value for clinically important traumatic brain injury (ciTBI) in children with mild head injury (Glasgow Coma Score [GCS] 14 or 15). Our goal was to retrospectively apply their criteria to our database to determine the potential impact on the rates of unnecessary head computed tomography (CT) and ciTBI detection. The records of pediatric patients with GCS 14 to 15 that had a head CT for suspected TBI after blunt trauma from 2008 to 2010 were reviewed. Of 493 children, CT was negative in 447 (91%), but findings were present in 46 (9%). Applying PECARN recommendations, 178 (36%) met all six criteria but still underwent head CT; all were negative. The remaining 315 (64%) missed one or more PECARN criteria and underwent CT; only 46 (15%) had findings, and two (0.6%) required surgery. There were no false-negatives. The negative predictive value for ciTBI was 100 per cent. Observance of PECARN guidelines identifies children who do not require CT, increasing the yield of finding a ciTBI among those who cannot satisfy all six criteria.


Asunto(s)
Lesiones Encefálicas/clasificación , Lesiones Encefálicas/diagnóstico por imagen , Servicios Médicos de Urgencia/normas , Adhesión a Directriz/estadística & datos numéricos , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Heridas no Penetrantes/diagnóstico por imagen , Adolescente , Niño , Preescolar , Control de Costos , Femenino , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación , Masculino , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X/economía , Procedimientos Innecesarios/economía
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA