Time course of CYP3A activity during and after metamizole (dipyrone) in healthy volunteers.

AIMS: In patients of all ages, metamizole is a frequently used analgesic. Recently, metamizole has been identified as an inducer of, among others, cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A activity, but the time course of this interaction has not been evaluated. METHODS: Using repeated oral microdoses (30 µg) of the CYP3A index substrate midazolam, we assessed changes in midazolam pharmacokinetics (area under the concentration-time curve from 2-4 h: AUC2-4 and estimated partial metabolic clearance: eClmet ) before, at steady-state, and after discontinuation of 3 × 1000 mg metamizole/day orally for 8 days. RESULTS: Significant changes in pharmacokinetic parameters were detected already 3 days after start of metamizole treatment. At the steady-state of enzyme induction, the geometric mean ratio of midazolam AUC2-4 was substantially reduced to 0.18 (90% confidence interval: 0.14-0.24) with a corresponding 5.43-fold (4.15-7.10) increase of eClmet . After discontinuation of metamizole, the changes slowly recovered, but were still significant at the end of the observation period on the fifth day after discontinuation of metamizole therapy (AUC2-4 reduced to 0.50 [0.41-0.63] and eClmet 1.99-fold increased [1.60-2.47, P < 0.05]). CONCLUSION: Metamizole acts as a strong inducer of CYP3A already few days after start of metamizole administration and, thus, should be avoided in patients using drugs with narrow therapeutic index and major clearance via CYP3A. If their administration is essential, close monitoring and dose adjustment of comedication should be performed as early as the first week after the initiation and after discontinuation of metamizole therapy.

Effect of Clarithromycin, a Strong CYP3A and P-glycoprotein Inhibitor, on the Pharmacokinetics of Edoxaban in Healthy Volunteers and the Evaluation of the Drug Interaction with Other Oral Factor Xa Inhibitors by a Microdose Cocktail Approach.

PURPOSE: We assessed the differential effect of clarithromycin, a strong inhibitor of cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4 and P-glycoprotein, on the pharmacokinetics of a regular dose of edoxaban and on a microdose cocktail of factor Xa inhibitors (FXaI). Concurrently, CYP3A activity was determined with a midazolam microdose. METHODS: In an open-label fixed-sequence trial in 12 healthy volunteers, the pharmacokinetics of a microdosed FXaI cocktail (µ-FXaI; 25 µg apixaban, 50 µg edoxaban, and 25 µg rivaroxaban) and of 60 mg edoxaban before and during clarithromycin (2 x 500 mg/d) dosed to steady-state was evaluated. Plasma concentrations of study drugs were quantified using validated ultra-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry methods. RESULTS: Therapeutic clarithromycin doses increased the exposure of a therapeutic 60 mg dose of edoxaban with a geometric mean ratio (GMR) of the area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) of 1.53 (90 % CI: 1.37-1.70; p < 0.0001). Clarithromycin also increased the GMR (90% CI) of the exposure of microdosed FXaI apixaban to 1.38 (1.26-1.51), edoxaban to 2.03 (1.84-2.24), and rivaroxaban to 1.44 (1.27-1.63). AUC changes observed for the therapeutic edoxaban dose were significantly smaller than those observed with the microdose (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Clarithromycin increases FXaI exposure. However, the magnitude of this drug interaction is not expected to be clinically relevant. The edoxaban microdose overestimates the extent of the drug interaction with the therapeutic dose, whereas AUC ratios for apixaban and rivaroxaban were comparable to the interaction with therapeutic doses as reported in the literature. TRIAL REGISTRATION: EudraCT Number: 2018-002490-22.

Influence of a Short Course of Ritonavir Used as Booster in Antiviral Therapies Against SARS-CoV-2 on the Exposure of Atorvastatin and Rosuvastatin.

PURPOSE: Early antiviral treatment with nirmatrelvir/ritonavir is recommended for SARS-CoV-2-infected patients at high risk for severe courses. Such patients are usually chronically ill and susceptible to adverse drug interactions caused by ritonavir. We investigated the interactions of short-term low-dose ritonavir therapy with atorvastatin and rosuvastatin, two statins commonly used in this population. METHOD: We assessed exposure changes (area under the concentration-time curve (AUC∞) and maximum concentration (Cmax)) of a single dose of 10 mg atorvastatin and 10 mg rosuvastatin before and on the fifth day of ritonavir treatment (2 × 100 mg/day) in healthy volunteers and developed a semi-mechanistic pharmacokinetic model to estimate dose adjustment of atorvastatin during ritonavir treatment. RESULTS: By the fifth day of ritonavir treatment, the AUC∞ of atorvastatin increased 4.76-fold and Cmax 3.78-fold, and concurrently, the concentration of atorvastatin metabolites decreased to values below the lower limit of quantification. Pharmacokinetic modelling indicated that a stepwise reduction in atorvastatin dose during ritonavir treatment with a stepwise increase up to 4 days after ritonavir discontinuation can keep atorvastatin exposure within safe and effective margins. Rosuvastatin pharmacokinetics were only mildly modified; ritonavir significantly increased the Cmax 1.94-fold, while AUC∞ was unchanged. CONCLUSION: Atorvastatin doses should likely be adjusted during nirmatrelvir/ritonavir treatment. For patients on a 20-mg dose, we recommend half of the original dose. In patients taking 40 mg or more, a quarter of the dose should be taken until 2 days after discontinuation of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir. Patients receiving rosuvastatin do not need to change their treatment regimen. TRIAL REGISTRATION: EudraCT number: 2021-006634-39. DRKS00027838.

Microdialysis of Voriconazole and its N-Oxide Metabolite: Amalgamating Knowledge of Distribution and Metabolism Processes in Humans.

PURPOSE: Voriconazole is an essential antifungal drug whose complex pharmacokinetics with high interindividual variability impedes effective and safe therapy. By application of the minimally-invasive sampling technique microdialysis, interstitial space fluid (ISF) concentrations of VRC and its potentially toxic N-oxide metabolite (NO) were assessed to evaluate target-site exposure for further elucidating VRC pharmacokinetics. METHODS: Plasma and ISF samples of a clinical trial with an approved VRC dosing regimen were analyzed for VRC and NO concentrations. Concentration-time profiles, exposure assessed as area-under-the-curve (AUC) and metabolic ratios of four healthy adults in plasma and ISF were evaluated regarding the impact of multiple dosing and CYP2C19 genotype. RESULTS: VRC and NO revealed distribution into ISF with AUC values being ≤2.82- and 17.7-fold lower compared to plasma, respectively. Intraindividual variability of metabolic ratios was largest after the first VRC dose administration while interindividual variability increased with multiple dosing. The CYP2C19 genotype influenced interindividual differences with a maximum 6- and 24-fold larger AUCNO/AUCVRC ratio between the intermediate and rapid metabolizer in plasma and ISF, respectively. VRC metabolism was saturated/auto-inhibited indicated by substantially decreasing metabolic concentration ratios with increasing VRC concentrations and after multiple dosing. CONCLUSION: The feasibility of the simultaneous microdialysis of VRC and NO in vivo was demonstrated and provided new quantitative insights by leveraging distribution and metabolism processes of VRC in humans. The exploratory analysis suggested substantial dissimilarities of VRC and NO pharmacokinetics in plasma and ISF. Ultimately, a thorough understanding of target-site pharmacokinetics might contribute to the optimization of personalized VRC dosing regimens.

Microdialysis of Drug and Drug Metabolite: a Comprehensive In Vitro Analysis for Voriconazole and Voriconazole N-oxide.

PURPOSE: Voriconazole is a therapeutically challenging antifungal drug associated with high interindividual pharmacokinetic variability. As a prerequisite to performing clinical trials using the minimally-invasive sampling technique microdialysis, a comprehensive in vitro microdialysis characterization of voriconazole (VRC) and its potentially toxic N-oxide metabolite (NO) was performed. METHODS: The feasibility of simultaneous microdialysis of VRC and NO was explored in vitro by investigating the relative recovery (RR) of both compounds in the absence and presence of the other. The dependency of RR on compound combination, concentration, microdialysis catheter and study day was evaluated and quantified by linear mixed-effects modeling. RESULTS: Median RR of VRC and NO during individual microdialysis were high (87.6% and 91.1%). During simultaneous microdialysis of VRC and NO, median RR did not change (87.9% and 91.1%). The linear mixed-effects model confirmed the absence of significant differences between RR of VRC and NO during individual and simultaneous microdialysis as well as between the two compounds (p > 0.05). No concentration dependency of RR was found (p = 0.284). The study day was the main source of variability (46.3%) while the microdialysis catheter only had a minor effect (4.33%). VRC retrodialysis proved feasible as catheter calibration for both compounds. CONCLUSION: These in vitro microdialysis results encourage the application of microdialysis in clinical trials to assess target-site concentrations of VRC and NO. This can support the generation of a coherent understanding of VRC pharmacokinetics and its sources of variability. Ultimately, a better understanding of human VRC pharmacokinetics might contribute to the development of personalized dosing strategies.

Evaluation of CYP2C19 activity using microdosed oral omeprazole in humans.

PURPOSE: To investigate the suitability of microdosed oral omeprazole for predicting CYP2C19 activity in vivo in combination with simultaneous assessment of CYP3A and CYP2D6 activity using both microdosed midazolam and yohimbine. METHODS: An open, fixed-sequence study was carried out in 20 healthy participants. Single microdosed (100 µg) and therapeutic (20 mg) doses of omeprazole were evaluated without comedication and after administration of established CYP2C19 perpetrators fluconazole (inhibition) and rifampicin (induction). To prevent degradation of the uncoated omeprazole microdose, sodium bicarbonate buffer was administered. The pharmacokinetics of omeprazole and its 5-hydroxy-metabolite were assessed as well as the pharmacokinetics of midazolam and yohimbine to estimate CYP3A4 and CYP2D6 activity. RESULTS: Calculated pharmacokinetic parameters after administration of 100 µg and 20 mg omeprazole in healthy subjects suggest dose proportionality. Omeprazole clearance was significantly decreased by fluconazole from 388 [95% CI: 266-565] to 47.2 [42.8-52.0] mL/min after 20 mg omeprazole and even further after 100 µg omeprazole (29.4 [24.5-35.1] mL/min). Rifampicin increased CYP2C19-mediated omeprazole metabolism. The omeprazole hydroxylation index was significantly related to omeprazole clearance for both doses. Both fluconazole and rifampicin altered CYP3A4 activity whereas no change of CYP2D6 activity was observed at all. CONCLUSIONS: Microdosed oral omeprazole is suitable to determine CYP2C19 activity, also during enzyme inhibition and induction. However, the administration of sodium bicarbonate buffer also had a small influence on all victim drugs used. TRIAL REGISTRATION: EudraCT: 2017-004270-34.

Oral bioavailability of microdoses and therapeutic doses of midazolam as a 2-dimensionally printed orodispersible film in healthy volunteers.

PURPOSE: The use of two-dimensional (2D) printing technologies of drugs on orodispersible films (ODF) can promote dose individualization and facilitate drug delivery in vulnerable patients, including children. We investigated midazolam pharmacokinetics after the administration of 2D-printed ODF. METHODS: Midazolam doses of 0.03 and 3 mg were printed on an ODF using a 2D drug printer. We investigated the bioavailability of the two midazolam doses with ODF swallowed immediately (ODF-IS) or delayed after 2 min (ODF-DS) by comparing their pharmacokinetics with intravenous and oral midazolam solution in 12 healthy volunteers. RESULTS: The relative bioavailability of ODF-IS 0.03 mg was 102% (90% confidence interval: 89.4-116) compared to oral solution and for 3 mg 101% (86.8-116). Cmax of ODF-IS 0.03 mg was 95.5% (83.2-110) compared to oral solution and 94.3% (78.2-114) after 3 mg. Absolute bioavailability of ODF-IS 0.03 mg was 24.9% (21.2-29.2) and for 3 mg 28.1% (23.4-33.8) (oral solution: 0.03 mg: 24.4% (22.0-27.1); 3 mg: 28.0% (25.0-31.2)). Absolute bioavailability of ODF-DS was significantly larger than for ODF-IS (0.03 mg: 61.4%; 3 mg: 44.1%; both p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: This trial demonstrates the tolerability and unchanged bioavailability of midazolam printed on ODF over a 100-fold dose range, proving the suitability of ODF for dose individualization. Midazolam ODF-IS AUC0-∞ in both doses was bioequivalent to the administration of an oral solution. However, Cmax of the therapeutic dose of ODF-IS missed bioequivalence by a clinically not relevant extent. Prolonged mucosal exposure increased bioavailability. (Trial Registration EudraCT: 2020-003984-24, August 10, 2020).

Midazolam microdosing applied in early clinical development for drug-drug interaction assessment.

AIMS: We aimed to incorporate a pharmacologically inactive midazolam microdose into early clinical studies for the assessment of CYP3A drug-drug interaction liability. METHODS: Three early clinical studies were conducted with substances (Compounds A, B and C) which gave positive CYP3A perpetrator signals in vitro. A 75 µg dose of midazolam was administered alone (baseline CYP3A activity) followed by administration with the highest dose groups tested for each compound on Day 1/3 and Day 14 or Day 17. Midazolam exposure (AUC0-∞ , Cmax ) during administration with the test substances was compared to baseline data via an analysis of variance on log-transformed data. Partial AUC2-4 ratios were also compared to AUC0-∞ ratios using linear regression on log-transformed data. RESULTS: Test compound Cmax values exceeded relevant thresholds for drug-drug interaction liability. Midazolam concentrations were quantifiable over the full profiles for all subjects in all studies. Point estimates of the midazolam AUC0-∞ gMean ratios ranged from 108.3 to 127.1% for Compound A, from 93.3 to 114.5% for Compound B, and from 92.0 to 96.7% for the two highest dose groups of Compound C. Cmax gMean ratios were in the same range. Thus, no relevant drug-drug interactions were evident, based on the results of midazolam microdosing. AUC2-4 ratios from these studies were comparable to the AUC0-∞ ratios. CONCLUSION: Midazolam microdosing incorporated into early clinical studies is a feasible tool for reducing dedicated drug-drug interaction studies, meaning reduced subject burden. Limited sampling could further reduce subject burden, costs and needed resources.

CYP2D6 phenotype explains reported yohimbine concentrations in four severe acute intoxications.

The indole alkaloid yohimbine is an alpha-2 receptor antagonist used for its sympathomimetic effects. Several cases of yohimbine intoxication have been reported and the most recent one involved four individuals taking a yohimbine-containing drug powder. All individuals developed severe intoxication symptoms and were admitted to the hospital. Even though all individuals were assumed to have taken the same dose of the drug powder, toxicology analyses revealed yohimbine blood concentrations of 249-5631 ng/mL, amounting to a 22-fold difference. The reason for this high variability remained to be elucidated. We used recently reported knowledge on the metabolism of yohimbine together with state-of-the art nonlinear mixed-effects modelling and simulation and show that a patient's cytochrome P450 2D6 (CYP2D6) phenotype can explain the large differences observed in the measured concentration after intake of the same yohimbine dose. Our findings can be used both for the identification of safe doses in therapeutic use of yohimbine and for an explanation of individual cases of overdosing.

Application of a microdosed cocktail of 3 oral factor Xa inhibitors to study drug-drug interactions with different perpetrator drugs.

AIMS: Using 3 different perpetrators the impact of voriconazole, cobicistat and rifampicin (single dose), we evaluated the suitability of a microdose cocktail of factor Xa inhibitors (FXaI; rivaroxaban, apixaban and edoxaban; 100 µg in total) to study drug-drug interactions. METHODS: Three cohorts of 6 healthy volunteers received 2 treatments with microdoses of rivaroxaban, apixaban and edoxaban alone and with coadministration of 1 of the perpetrators. Plasma and urine concentrations of microdosed apixaban, edoxaban and rivaroxaban were quantified using a validated ultra-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry with a lower limit of quantification of 2.5 pg/mL. RESULTS: Voriconazole caused only a minor interaction with apixaban and rivaroxaban, none with edoxaban. Cobicistat significantly increased exposure of all 3 FXaI with area under the plasma concentration-time curve ratios of 1.67 (apixaban), 1.74 (edoxaban) and 2.0 (rivaroxaban). A single dose of rifampicin decreased the volume of distribution and elimination half-life of all 3 FXaI. CONCLUSIONS: The microdosed FXaI cocktail approach is able to generate drug interaction data and can help elucidating the mechanism involved in the clearance of the different victim drugs. This is a safe approach to concurrently study drug-drug interactions with a drug class. (EudraCT 2016-003024-23).

Composite midazolam and 1'-OH midazolam population pharmacokinetic model for constitutive, inhibited and induced CYP3A activity.

CYP3A plays an important role in drug metabolism and, thus, can be a considerable liability for drug-drug interactions. Population pharmacokinetics may be an efficient tool for detecting such drug-drug interactions. Multiple models have been developed for midazolam, the typical probe substrate for CYP3A activity, but no population pharmacokinetic models have been developed for use with inhibition or induction. The objective of the current analysis was to develop a composite parent-metabolite model for midazolam which could adequately describe CYP3A drug-drug interactions. As an exploratory objective, parameters were assessed for potential cut-points which may allow for determination of drug-drug interactions when a baseline profile is not available. The final interaction model adequately described midazolam and 1'-OH midazolam concentrations for constitutive, inhibited, and induced CYP3A activity. The model showed good internal and external validity, both with full profiles and limited sampling (2, 2.5, 3, and 4 h), and the model predicted parameters were congruent with values found in clinical studies. Assessment of potential cut-points for model predicted parameters to assess drug-drug interaction liability with a single profile suggested that midazolam clearance may reasonably be used to detect inhibition (4.82-16.4 L/h), induction (41.8-88.9 L/h), and no modulation (16.4-41.8 L/h), with sensitivities for potent inhibition and induction of 87.9% and 83.3%, respectively, and a specificity of 98.2% for no modulation. Thus, the current model and cut-points could provide efficient and accurate tools for drug-drug liability detection, both during drug development and in the clinic, following prospective validation in healthy volunteers and patient populations.

Novel insights into the complex pharmacokinetics of voriconazole: a review of its metabolism.

Voriconazole, a second-generation triazole frequently used for the prophylaxis and treatment of invasive fungal infections, undergoes complex metabolism mainly involving various (polymorphic) cytochrome P450 enzymes in humans. Although high inter- and intraindividual variability in voriconazole pharmacokinetics have been observed and the therapeutic range for this compound is relatively narrow, the metabolism of voriconazole has not been fully elucidated yet. The available literature data investigating the multiple different pathways and metabolites are extremely unbalanced and thus the absolute or relative contribution of the different pathways and enzymes involved in the metabolism of voriconazole remains uncertain. Furthermore, other factors such as nonlinear pharmacokinetics caused by auto-inhibition or -induction and polymorphisms of the metabolizing enzymes hinder safe and effective voriconazole dosing in clinical practice and have not yet been studied sufficiently. This review aimed at amalgamating the available literature on the pharmacokinetics of voriconazole in vitro and in vivo, with a special focus on metabolism in adults and children, in order to congregate an overall landscape of the current body of knowledge and identify knowledge gaps, opening the way towards further research in order to foster the understanding, towards better therapeutic dosing decisions.

Simultaneous phenotyping of CYP2E1 and CYP3A using oral chlorzoxazone and midazolam microdoses.

AIMS: Chlorzoxazone is the paradigm marker substrate for CYP2E1 phenotyping in vivo. Because at the commonly used milligram doses (250-750 mg) chlorzoxazone acts as an inhibitor of the CYP3A4/5 marker substrate midazolam, previous attempts failed to combine both drugs in a common phenotyping cocktail. Microdosing chlorzoxazone could circumvent this problem. METHOD: We enrolled 12 healthy volunteers in a trial investigating the dose-exposure relationship of single ascending chlorzoxazone oral doses over a 10,000-fold range (0.05-500 mg) and assessed the effect of 0.1 and 500 mg of chlorzoxazone on oral midazolam pharmacokinetics (0.003 mg). RESULTS: Chlorzoxazone area under the concentration-time curve was dose-linear in the dose range between 0.05 and 5 mg. A nonlinear increase occurred with doses ≥50 mg, probably due to saturated presystemic metabolic elimination. While midazolam area under the concentration-time curve increased 2-fold when coadministered with 500 mg of chlorzoxazone, there was no pharmacokinetic interaction between chlorzoxazone and midazolam microdoses. CONCLUSION: The chlorzoxazone microdose did not interact with the CYP3A marker substrate midazolam, enabling the simultaneous administration in a phenotyping cocktail. This microdose assay is now ready to be further validated and tested as a phenotyping procedure assessing the impact of induction and inhibition of CYP2E1 on chlorzoxazone microdose pharmacokinetics.

Alteration of drug-metabolizing enzyme activity in palliative care patients: Microdosed assessment of cytochrome P450 3A.

BACKGROUND: Cytochrome P450 3A is the most relevant drug-metabolizing enzyme in humans as it is involved in the elimination of 50% of marketed drugs. Nothing is known about the activity of cytochrome P450 3A in palliative care patients who have complicated symptoms often associated with a terminal illness. AIM: In order to improve drug dosing in end-of-life care and to avoid drug interactions, cytochrome P450 3A activity was determined in patients of a palliative care unit under real-life clinical conditions. DESIGN: As midazolam is an established marker substance for cytochrome P450 3A activity, this single-arm prospective trial was designed to obtain a 4-h pharmacokinetic profile of midazolam after oral administration of a 10-µg dose from each enrolled patient. Plasma concentrations of midazolam and its primary metabolite 1'-hydroxy-midazolam were quantified by mass spectrometry techniques. Cytochrome P450 3A activity was calculated as partial metabolic clearance from a limited sampling area under the curve. All other drugs taken by the participating patients were considered, as well as recent blood test results and patients' diagnoses. The trial was registered at German Clinical Trials Register ( www.drks.de ): DRKS00011753. SETTING/PARTICIPANTS: The trial was carried out at a university palliative care unit under real-life clinical conditions. Every patient admitted to the ward was screened for possible participation, independent of the individual performance status. RESULTS: Partial metabolic clearance of midazolam in palliative care patients was 31.7 ± 32.1 L/h. This was a highly significant 40% reduction (p < 0.0001) in comparison with the cytochrome P450 3A activity of healthy subjects. CONCLUSION: Dosing of cytochrome P450 3A substrate drugs (e.g. macrolide antibiotics, benzodiazepines, calcium channel blockers) needs to be adjusted in palliative care patients; otherwise, escalation of debilitating symptoms due to drug interactions might occur.

Methadone against cancer: Lost in translation.

Recently, the opioid analgesic d,l-methadone has gained much attention as a potential antineoplastic compound, considerably triggered through lay press and media. In consequence, physicians and pharmacists are currently confronted with numerous patients willing to use d,l-methadone against their malignancies. Well-performed in vitro and in vivo models have in fact shown pro-apoptotic effects of d,l-methadone or other opioids, but also proliferation-stimulating properties. Moreover, the mechanisms of proposed opioid-stimulated apoptosis are incompletely described or contradicting. Finally, the receptors mostly responsible for induction of apoptosis by d,l-methadone remain unclear as contributions of both µ-opioid receptors, Fas cell death receptors, toll-like receptors, N-Methyl-d-aspartate receptors and opioid growth factor receptors were suggested. Such ambiguity prevents rational application of d,l-methadone or patient stratification to enhance beneficial antineoplastic effects. From a clinical point of view, d,l-methadone and other opioids might in fact prolong survival, but such effects likely originate from their analgesic and neuro-psychotropic properties and, thus, improvements of quality of life. Crucial obstacles to the administration of d,l-methadone are incomplete knowledge about its systemic disposition, highly variable pharmacokinetics, profound drug-drug- or drug-disease interaction and QT-prolongation potential. This article summarizes and rates the pharmacological basis of d,l-methadone as an antineoplastic agent and puts its administration in clinical oncology into perspective. Despite enthralling experimental findings about d,l-methadone-mediated apoptosis in cancerous cells or tissues, clinicians should realize the current lack of evidence for the use of d,l-methadone as an antineoplastic agent. Its administration against cancer pain is, however, tenable, albeit restricted to certain clinical situations.

Rivaroxaban and macitentan can be coadministered without dose adjustment but the combination of rivaroxaban and St John's wort should be avoided.

AIMS: We assessed the potential mutual interaction of oral macitentan (cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4 substrate) at steady-state with single-dose oral rivaroxaban (CYP3A4 and P-glycoprotein substrate) and evaluated the effect of the CYP3A and P-glycoprotein inducer St John's wort (SJW) on the pharmacokinetics of these drugs in healthy volunteers. METHODS: Twelve healthy volunteers completed this open-label, monocentre, two-period, one-sequence phase I clinical trial. The pharmacokinetics of macitentan (10 mg) was assessed on study days 3 (single dose), 15 (steady-state), 16 (impact of rivaroxaban) and 29 (after induction by oral SJW), and of rivaroxaban on days 2 (single dose), 16 (impact of macitentan at steady-state) and 29 (after induction by SJW). Concurrently, we quantified changes of CYP3A activity using oral microdoses of midazolam (30 µg). RESULTS: Rivaroxaban and macitentan did not significantly change the pharmacokinetics of each other. After induction with SJW, CYP3A activity increased by 272% and geometric mean ratios of macitentan AUC decreased by 48% and of Cmax by 45%. Concurrently, also geometric mean ratios of rivaroxaban AUC and Cmax decreased by 25%. CONCLUSIONS: There is no evidence for a relevant pharmacokinetic interaction between macitentan and rivaroxaban suggesting that these two drugs can be combined without dose adjustment. SJW strongly increased CYP3A activity and substantially reduced rivaroxaban and macitentan exposure while estimated net endothelin antagonism only decreased by 20%, which is considered clinically irrelevant. The combination of SJW with rivaroxaban should be avoided.

In vitro inhibition of human UGT isoforms by ritonavir and cobicistat.

1. Ritonavir and cobicistat are pharmacokinetic boosting agents used to increase systemic exposure to other antiretroviral therapies. The manufacturer's data suggests that cobicistat is a more selective CYP3A4 inhibitor than ritonavir. However, the inhibitory effect of ritonavir and cobicistat on human UDP glucuronosyltransferase (UGT) enzymes in Phase II metabolism is not established. This study evaluated the inhibition of human UGT isoforms by ritonavir versus cobicistat. 2. Acetaminophen and ibuprofen were used as substrates to evaluate the metabolic activity of the principal human UGTs. Metabolite formation rates were determined by HPLC analysis of incubates following in vitro incubation of index substrates with human liver microsomes (HLMs) at different concentrations of ritonavir or cobicistat. Probenecid and estradiol served as positive control inhibitors. 3. The 50% inhibitory concentrations (IC50) of cobicistat and ritonavir were at least 50 µM, which substantially exceeds usual clinical plasma concentrations. Probenecid inhibited the glucuronidation of acetaminophen (IC50 0.7 mM), but not glucuronidation of ibuprofen. At relatively high concentrations, estradiol inhibited ibuprofen glucuronidation (IC50 17 µM). 4. Ritonavir and cobicistat are unlikely to produce clinically important drug interactions involving drugs metabolized to glucuronide conjugates by UGT1A1, 1A3, 1A6, 1A9, 2B4 and 2B7.

Autoinhibitory properties of the parent but not of the N-oxide metabolite contribute to infusion rate-dependent voriconazole pharmacokinetics.

AIMS: The pharmacokinetics of voriconazole show a nonlinear dose-exposure relationship caused by inhibition of its own CYP3A-dependent metabolism. Because the magnitude of autoinhibition also depends on voriconazole concentrations, infusion rate might modulate voriconazole exposure. The impact of four different infusion rates on voriconazole pharmacokinetics was investigated. METHODS: Twelve healthy participants received 100 mg voriconazole intravenous over 4 h, 400 mg over 6 h, 4 h, and 2 h in a crossover design. Oral midazolam (3 µg) was given at the end of infusion. Blood and urine samples were collected up to 48 h. Voriconazole and its N-oxide metabolite were quantified using high-performance liquid chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry. Midazolam estimated metabolic clearance (eCLmet) was calculated using a limited sampling strategy. Voriconazole-N-oxide inhibition of cytochrome P450 (CYP) isoforms 2C19 and 3A4 were assessed with the P450-Glo luminescence assay. RESULTS: Area under the concentration-time curve for 400 mg intravenous voriconazole was 16% (90% confidence interval: 12-20%) lower when administered over 6 h compared to 2 h infusion. Dose-corrected area under the concentration-time curve for 100 mg over 4 h was 34% lower compared to 400 mg over 4 h. Midazolam eCLmet was 516 ml min-1 (420-640) following 100 mg 4 h-1 voriconazole, 152 ml min-1 (139-166) for 400 mg 6 h-1 , 192 ml min-1 (167-220) for 400 mg 4 h-1 , and 202 ml min-1 (189-217) for 400 mg 2 h-1 . Concentration giving 50% CYP inhibition of voriconazole N-oxide was 146 ± 23 µmol l-1 for CYP3A4, and 40.2 ± 4.2 µmol l-1 for CYP2C19. CONCLUSIONS: Voriconazole pharmacokinetics is modulated by infusion rate, an autoinhibitory contribution voriconazole metabolism by CYP3A and 2C19 and to a lesser extent its main N-oxide metabolite for CYP2C19. To avoid reduced exposure, the infusion rate should be 2 h.

Who is a 'healthy subject'?-consensus results on pivotal eligibility criteria for clinical trials.

INTRODUCTION/METHODS: A discussion forum was hosted by the German not-for-profit Association for Applied Human Pharmacology (AGAH e.V.) to critically review key eligibility criteria and stopping rules for clinical trials with healthy subjects, enrolling stakeholders from the pharmaceutical industry, contract research organisations, academia, ethics committees and competent authority. RESULTS: Pivotal eligibility criteria were defined for trials with new investigational medicinal products (IMPs) or with clinically established IMPs. In general, a pulse rate ranging between 50 and 90 beats/min is recommended for first-in-human (FIH) trials, while wider ranges seem acceptable for trials with clinically established IMPs, provided there are no indications of thyroid dysfunction. Hepatic laboratory parameters not to exceed the upper limit of normal (ULN) comprise ALT (alanine aminotransferase) and AST (aspartate aminotransferase) in FIH trials, whereas slight elevations (10% above ULN) seem acceptable in trials with clinically established IMPs without known hepatotoxicity. A normal renal function is required for any clinical trial in healthy subjects. A risk-adapted approach for stopping rules was adopted. Stopping rules for an individual subject are one adverse event of severe intensity or one serious adverse event. In case of a severe adverse event, some stakeholders demand a causal relationship with the IMP (i.e. an adverse reaction). Stopping rules for a cohort are one serious adverse reaction or ≥50% of subjects experiencing any adverse reaction of moderate or severe intensity. CONSEQUENCES: The application of this consensus resulted in a reduction in protocol deficiencies issued by the competent authority.

First-in-human application of the novel hepatitis B and hepatitis D virus entry inhibitor myrcludex B.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Myrcludex B is a first-in-class compound, which blocks entry of hepatitis B and D virus into hepatocytes in vitro and in animal models. Based on the required preclinical data we aimed to translate this compound into the first application in humans. METHODS: Single ascending doses of myrcludex B, a 47 amino acid peptide, were administered up to 20mg intravenously and 10mg subcutaneously in a prospective open first-in-human, phase I clinical trial to 36 healthy volunteers. Safety, tolerability and plasma concentrations of myrcludex B were assessed and a pharmacokinetic model was derived. RESULTS: Myrcludex B was well tolerated and no serious or relevant AEs representing off-target effects, and no immunogenic effects were observed up to the highest applied dose of 20mg (intravenously). Myrcludex B showed dose-dependent pharmacokinetics, best described by a 2-compartment target-mediated drug disposition model. Bioavailability of the subcutaneous application was large (85%). Interindividual variability was moderate. The pharmacokinetic model suggested that subcutaneous doses of 10mg and above reach a target saturation of over 80% for at least 15h. CONCLUSIONS: Myrcludex B showed excellent tolerability up to high doses. Pharmacologic properties followed a 2-compartment target-mediated drug disposition model. These findings are vital for planning of further multiple dose efficacy trials in patients. LAY SUMMARY: After showing antiviral activity in cell culture and animal models, myrcludex B, a new drug intended for the treatment of hepatitis B and D, has been administered the first time in humans. Healthy volunteers received the drug intravenously and subcutaneously up to high doses (20mg). The drug was well tolerated and the characteristics of the drug determining its way in the human body could be described. These results will allow testing myrcludex B in hepatitis B and D patients.