RESUMEN
Hepatic sinusoids are highly specialized microcirculatory conduits within the hepatic lobules that facilitate liver functions. The sinusoids can be affected by various disorders, including sinusoidal dilatation, sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (SOS), sinusoidal cellular infiltration, perisinusoidal infiltration, and endothelial neoplasms, such as hemangioendothelioma and angiosarcoma. While these disorders, particularly SOS and neoplasms, can be life threatening, their clinical manifestation is often nonspecific. Patients may present with right upper quadrant pain, jaundice, hepatomegaly, ascites, splenomegaly, and unexplained weight gain, although the exact manifestation depends on the cause, severity, and duration of the disease. Ultimately, invasive tests may be necessary to establish the diagnosis. A comprehensive understanding of imaging manifestations of various sinusoidal disorders contributes to early diagnosis and can help radiologists detect subclinical disease. Additionally, specific imaging features may assist in identifying the cause of the disorder, leading to a more focused and quicker workup. For example, a mosaic pattern of enhancement of the liver parenchyma is suggestive of sinusoidal dilatation; peripheral and patchy reticular hypointensity of the liver parenchyma on hepatobiliary MR images is characteristic of SOS; and associated diffuse multiple hyperintensities on diffusion-weighted images may be specific for malignant sinusoidal cellular infiltration. The authors provide an overview of the pathogenesis, clinical features, and imaging appearances of various hepatic sinusoidal disorders, with a special emphasis on SOS. ©RSNA, 2024 Supplemental material is available for this article.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedad Veno-Oclusiva Hepática , Humanos , Enfermedad Veno-Oclusiva Hepática/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias Hepáticas/diagnóstico por imagen , Diagnóstico DiferencialRESUMEN
Pathologic conditions of the biliary system, although common, can be difficult to diagnose clinically. Challenges in biliary imaging include anatomic variants and the dynamic nature of the biliary tract, which can change with age and intervention, blurring the boundaries of normal and abnormal. Choledochal cysts can have numerous appearances and are important to diagnose given the risk of cholangiocarcinoma potentially requiring surgical resection. Choledocholithiasis, the most common cause of biliary dilatation, can be difficult to detect at US and CT, with MRI having the highest sensitivity. However, knowledge of the imaging pitfalls of MRI and MR cholangiopancreatography is crucial to avoid misinterpretation. Newer concepts in biliary tract malignancy include intraductal papillary biliary neoplasms that may develop into cholangiocarcinoma. New paradigms in the classification of cholangiocarcinoma correspond to the wide range of imaging appearances of the disease and have implications for prognosis. Accurately staging cholangiocarcinoma is imperative, given expanding curative options including transplant and more aggressive surgical options. Infections of the biliary tree include acute cholangitis or recurrent pyogenic cholangitis, characterized by obstruction, strictures, and central biliary dilatation. Inflammatory conditions include primary sclerosing cholangitis, which features strictures and fibrosis but can be difficult to differentiate from secondary causes of sclerosing cholangitis, including more recently described entities such as immunoglobulin G4-related sclerosing cholangitis and COVID-19 secondary sclerosing cholangitis. The authors describe a wide variety of benign and malignant biliary tract abnormalities, highlight differentiating features of the cholangitides, provide an approach to interpretation based on the pattern of imaging findings, and discuss pearls and pitfalls of imaging to facilitate accurate diagnosis. ©RSNA, 2024 Supplemental material is available for this article.
Asunto(s)
Sistema Biliar , Humanos , Sistema Biliar/diagnóstico por imagen , Sistema Biliar/patología , Enfermedades de las Vías Biliares/diagnóstico por imagen , Diagnóstico DiferencialRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate if preoperative MRI can predict the most frequent HCC subtypes in North American and European patients treated with surgical resection. METHODS: A total of 119 HCCs in 97 patients were included in the North American group and 191 HCCs in 176 patients were included in the European group. Lesion subtyping was based on morphologic features and immuno-histopathological analysis. Two radiologists reviewed preoperative MRI and evaluated the presence of imaging features including LI-RADS major and ancillary features to identify clinical, biologic, and imaging features associated with the main HCC subtypes. RESULTS: Sixty-four percent of HCCs were conventional. The most frequent subtypes were macrotrabecular-massive (MTM-15%) and steatohepatitic (13%). Necrosis (OR = 3.32; 95% CI: 1.39, 7.89; p = .0064) and observation size (OR = 1.011; 95% CI: 1.0022, 1.019; p = .014) were independent predictors of MTM-HCC. Fat in mass (OR = 15.07; 95% CI: 6.57, 34.57; p < .0001), tumor size (OR = 0.97; 95% CI: 0.96, 0.99; p = .0037), and absence of chronic HCV infection (OR = 0.24; 95% CI: 0.084, 0.67; p = .0068) were independent predictors of steatohepatitic HCC. Independent predictors of conventional HCCs were viral C hepatitis (OR = 3.20; 95% CI: 1.62, 6.34; p = .0008), absence of fat (OR = 0.25; 95% CI: 0.12, 0.52; p = .0002), absence of tumor in vein (OR = 0.34; 95% CI: 0.13, 0.84; p = .020), and higher tumor-to-liver ADC ratio (OR = 1.96; 95% CI: 1.14, 3.35; p = .014) CONCLUSION: MRI is useful in predicting the most frequent HCC subtypes even in cohorts with different distributions of liver disease etiologies and tumor subtypes which might have future treatment and management implications. KEY POINTS: ⢠Representation of both liver disease etiologies and HCC subtypes differed between the North American and European cohorts of patients. ⢠Retrospective two-center study showed that liver MRI is useful in predicting the most frequent HCC subtypes.
Asunto(s)
Carcinoma Hepatocelular , Hígado Graso , Neoplasias Hepáticas , Humanos , Neoplasias Hepáticas/patología , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/patología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética/métodos , Medios de Contraste , Sensibilidad y EspecificidadRESUMEN
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is the most common primary pancreatic malignancy, ranking fourth in cancer-related mortality in the United States. Typically, PDAC appears on images as a hypovascular mass with upstream pancreatic duct dilatation and abrupt duct cutoff, distal pancreatic atrophy, and vascular encasement, with metastatic involvement including lymphadenopathy. However, atypical manifestations that may limit detection of the underlying PDAC may also occur. Atypical PDAC features include findings related to associated conditions such as acute or chronic pancreatitis, a mass that is isointense to the parenchyma, multiplicity, diffuse tumor infiltration, associated calcifications, and cystic components. Several neoplastic and inflammatory conditions can mimic PDAC, such as paraduodenal "groove" pancreatitis, autoimmune pancreatitis, focal acute and chronic pancreatitis, neuroendocrine tumors, solid pseudopapillary neoplasms, metastases, and lymphoma. Differentiation of these conditions from PDAC can be challenging due to overlapping CT and MRI features; however, certain findings can help in differentiation. Diffusion-weighted MRI can be helpful but also can be nonspecific. Accurate diagnosis is pivotal for guiding therapeutic planning and potential outcomes in PDAC and avoiding biopsy or surgical treatment of some of these mimics. Biopsy may still be required for diagnosis in some cases. The authors describe the typical and atypical imaging findings of PDAC and features that may help to differentiate PDAC from its mimics. ©RSNA, 2023 Online supplemental material is available for this article. Quiz questions for this article are available through the Online Learning Center. See the invited commentary by Zins in this issue.
Asunto(s)
Carcinoma Ductal Pancreático , Neoplasias Pancreáticas , Pancreatitis Crónica , Humanos , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/patología , Carcinoma Ductal Pancreático/diagnóstico por imagen , Carcinoma Ductal Pancreático/patología , Neoplasias PancreáticasRESUMEN
The commonly taught tenet that intratesticular lesions are always malignant and extratesticular scrotal lesions are always benign is a simplistic statement that erroneously minimizes the significance of extratesticular scrotal masses and their diagnosis. Yet, disease in the extratesticular space is commonly encountered by clinicians and radiologists and is often a source of uncertainty in diagnosis and management. Given the embryologically rooted complex anatomy of this region, a wide range of pathologic conditions is possible. Radiologists may not be familiar with some of these conditions; further, many of these lesions can have a specific sonographic appearance, allowing accurate diagnosis that can minimize surgical intervention. Lastly, malignancies can occur in the extratesticular space-although this is less common than in the testicles-and proper recognition of findings that warrant additional imaging or surgery is critical in optimizing outcomes. The authors present a compartmental anatomic framework for differential diagnosis of extratesticular scrotal masses and provide a comprehensive illustrative display of many of the pathologic conditions that can be encountered to familiarize radiologists with the sonographic appearances of these lesions. They also review management of these lesions and scenarios where US may not be definitive in diagnosis and selective use of scrotal MRI can be helpful. © RSNA, 2023 Quiz questions for this article are available in the supplemental material.
Asunto(s)
Escroto , Neoplasias Testiculares , Masculino , Humanos , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Escroto/diagnóstico por imagen , Escroto/patología , Ultrasonografía , Neoplasias Testiculares/patologíaRESUMEN
Quantitative imaging biomarkers of liver disease measured by using MRI and US are emerging as important clinical tools in the management of patients with chronic liver disease (CLD). Because of their high accuracy and noninvasive nature, in many cases, these techniques have replaced liver biopsy for the diagnosis, quantitative staging, and treatment monitoring of patients with CLD. The most commonly evaluated imaging biomarkers are surrogates for liver fibrosis, fat, and iron. MR elastography is now routinely performed to evaluate for liver fibrosis and typically combined with MRI-based liver fat and iron quantification to exclude or grade hepatic steatosis and iron overload, respectively. US elastography is also widely performed to evaluate for liver fibrosis and has the advantage of lower equipment cost and greater availability compared with those of MRI. Emerging US fat quantification methods can be performed along with US elastography. The author group, consisting of members of the Society of Abdominal Radiology (SAR) Liver Fibrosis Disease-Focused Panel (DFP), the SAR Hepatic Iron Overload DFP, and the European Society of Radiology, review the basics of liver fibrosis, fat, and iron quantification with MRI and liver fibrosis and fat quantification with US. The authors cover technical requirements, typical case display, quality control and proper measurement technique and case interpretation guidelines, pitfalls, and confounding factors. The authors aim to provide a practical guide for radiologists interpreting these examinations. © RSNA, 2023 See the invited commentary by Ronot in this issue. Quiz questions for this article are available in the supplemental material.
Asunto(s)
Diagnóstico por Imagen de Elasticidad , Sobrecarga de Hierro , Hepatopatías , Humanos , Hierro , Cirrosis Hepática/diagnóstico por imagen , Cirrosis Hepática/patología , Hígado/diagnóstico por imagen , Hígado/patología , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética/métodos , Hepatopatías/patología , Sobrecarga de Hierro/diagnóstico por imagen , Diagnóstico por Imagen de Elasticidad/métodos , Radiólogos , BiomarcadoresRESUMEN
Primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) is a chronic inflammatory disorder affecting the bile ducts and is characterized by biliary strictures, progressive liver parenchymal fibrosis, and an increased risk of hepatobiliary malignancies primarily cholangiocarcinoma (CCA). PSC may lead to portal hypertension, liver decompensation, and liver failure with the need for liver transplantation. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)/magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) are considered the imaging standard for diagnosis and follow-up in patients with PSC. Currently, there are no universally accepted reporting standards and definitions for MRI/MRCP features. Controversies exist about the definition of a high-grade stricture and there is no widely agreed approach to their management. The members of the MRI working group of the International Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis Study Group (IPSCSG) sought to define terminologies and reporting standards for describing MRI/MRCP features that would be applied to diagnosis and surveillance of disease progression, and potentially for evaluating treatment response in clinical trials. In this extensive review, the technique of MRI/MRCP and assessment of image quality for the evaluation of PSC is briefly described. The definitions and terminologies for severity and length of strictures, duct wall thickening and hyperenhancement, and liver parenchyma signal intensity changes are outlined. As CCA is an important complication of PSC, standardized reporting criteria for CCA developing in PSC are summarized. Finally, the guidelines for reporting important changes in follow-up MRI/MRCP studies are provided. KEY POINTS: ⢠Primary sclerosing cholangitis is a chronic inflammatory disorder affecting the bile ducts, causing biliary strictures and liver fibrosis and an increased risk of cholangiocarcinoma. ⢠This consensus document provides definitions and suggested reporting standards for MRI and MRCP features of primary sclerosing cholangitis, which will allow for a standardized approach to diagnosis, assessment of disease severity, follow-up, and detection of complications. ⢠Standardized definitions and reporting of MRI/MRCP features of PSC will facilitate comparison between studies, promote longitudinal assessment during management, reduce inter-reader variability, and enhance the quality of care and communication between health care providers.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de los Conductos Biliares , Colangiocarcinoma , Colangitis Esclerosante , Neoplasias de los Conductos Biliares/diagnóstico por imagen , Conductos Biliares Intrahepáticos , Colangiocarcinoma/diagnóstico por imagen , Pancreatocolangiografía por Resonancia Magnética , Colangitis Esclerosante/diagnóstico por imagen , Humanos , Imagen por Resonancia MagnéticaRESUMEN
The widespread use of high-spatial-resolution cross-sectional imaging has led to an increase in detection of incidental pancreatic cystic lesions. These lesions are a diverse group, ranging from indolent and premalignant lesions to invasive cancers. The diagnosis of several of these lesions can be suggested on the basis of their imaging appearance, while many other lesions require follow-up imaging and/or aspiration. The smaller cystic lesions, often branch-duct intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms, have overlapping imaging characteristics that make diagnostic assessment of the natural history and malignancy risk confusing. Expert panels have developed societal guidelines, based on a consensus, for surveillance of these lesions. However, these guidelines are often inconsistent and are constantly evolving as additional scientific data are accumulated. Identification of features associated with increased risk of malignancy is important for proper management. The concept of field defect, whereby pancreatic adenocarcinoma develops at a site different from the site of the pancreatic cyst, adds to the complexity of screening guidelines. As a result of the differences in guidelines, key stakeholders (eg, radiologists, gastroenterologists, and surgeons) must review and come to a consensus regarding which guideline, or combination of guidelines, to follow at their individual institutions. Standardized reporting and macros are helpful for ensuring the uniformity of interpretations. Radiologists play a critical role in the detection and characterization of pancreatic cystic lesions, in the follow-up recommendations for these lesions, and in the detection of associated cancer. An invited commentary by Zaheer is available online. Online supplemental material is available for this article. ©RSNA, 2021.
Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma , Quiste Pancreático , Neoplasias Pancreáticas , Adenocarcinoma/patología , Humanos , Páncreas , Quiste Pancreático/diagnóstico por imagen , Quiste Pancreático/patología , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/patologíaRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: The Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PIRADS) has shown promise in improving the detection of Gleason grade group (GG) 2-5 prostate cancer (PCa) and reducing the detection of indolent GG1 PCa. However, data on the performance of PIRADS in Black and Hispanic men is sparse. We evaluated the accuracy of PIRADS scores in detecting GG2-5 PCa in White, Black, and Hispanic men. METHODS: We performed a multicenter retrospective review of biopsy-naïve Black (n = 108), White (n = 108), and Hispanic (n = 64) men who underwent prostate biopsy (PB) following multiparametric MRI. Sensitivity and specificity of PIRADS for GG2-5 PCa were calculated. Race-stratified binary logistic regression models for GG2-5 PCa using standard clinical variables and PIRADS were used to calculate area under the receiver operating characteristics curves (AUC). RESULTS: Rates of GG2-5 PCa were statistically similar between Blacks, Whites, and Hispanics (52.8% vs 42.6% vs 37.5% respectively, p = 0.12). Sensitivity was lower in Hispanic men compared to White men (87.5% vs 97.8% respectively, p = 0.01). Specificity was similar in Black versus White men (21.6% vs 27.4%, p = 0.32) and White versus Hispanic men (27.4% vs 17.5%, p = 0.14). The AUCs of the PIRADS added to standard clinical data (age, PSA and suspicious prostate exam) were similar when comparing Black versus White men (0.75 vs 0.73, p = 0.79) and White versus Hispanic men (0.73 vs 0.59, p = 0.11). The AUCs for the Base model and PIRADS model alone were statistically similar when comparing Black versus White men and White versus Hispanic men. CONCLUSIONS: The accuracy of the PIRADS and clinical data for detecting GG2-5 PCa seems statistically similar across race. However, there is concern that PIRADS 2.0 has lower sensitivity in Hispanic men compared to White men. Prospective validation studies are needed.
Asunto(s)
Imágenes de Resonancia Magnética Multiparamétrica , Neoplasias de la Próstata , Biopsia , Etnicidad , Humanos , Biopsia Guiada por Imagen/métodos , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética/métodos , Masculino , Antígeno Prostático Específico , Neoplasias de la Próstata/diagnósticoRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Hemoperitoneum caused by ovarian cyst rupture may necessitate intervention. The literature is lacking in descriptions of CT findings that help guide patient management. The purpose of this study is to consider CT findings associated with a need for intervention (surgical or interventional radiology management) versus conservative treatment (observation, pain management, and blood transfusions). METHODS: Two radiologists retrospectively and independently reviewed 103 CTs of pre-menopausal women who presented with acute hemoperitoneum related to ruptured ovarian cysts between January 2010 and January 2019. The following imaging features were assessed: ovarian cyst characteristics, sentinel clot, contrast extravasation, and hemoperitoneum size. Findings were correlated with patient demographics, clinical parameters, and management with surgery/interventional radiology procedure (intervention group) versus conservative management (conservative group). RESULTS: Of the 103 patients with hemoperitoneum from cyst rupture, 16% (n = 16) required intervention, and 84% underwent conservative treatment (n = 87). Length of stay (p = .008) was higher in the intervention group. Statistically significant CT findings in the intervention versus conservative group included (p-value reader 1/p-value reader 2) greatest AP dimension of hemoperitoneum (p = .001/p = 0.02), posterior cul-de-sac AP dimension (p = 0.03/p = .006), total cul-de-sac AP dimension (p = .002/p = .007), and number of spaces with hemoperitoneum (p = .01/p = .02). There was good to excellent inter-reader agreement for these findings (ICC 0.68-0.91). Active contrast extravasation was significant for one reader (p = .02) with poor inter-reader agreement (ICC 0.36). In utilizing ROC curves, thresholds of 107 mm (greatest axial AP dimension of hemoperitoneum) yielded a sensitivity and specificity of 0.81 and 0.62 for reader 1 and 0.69 and 0.55 for reader 2; 45 mm (posterior cul-de-sac AP dimension) yielded a sensitivity and specificity of 0.75 and 0.63 for reader 1 and 0.94 and 0.49 for reader 2; 70 mm (total cul-de-sac AP dimension) yielded a sensitivity and specificity of 0.75 and 0.64 for reader 1 and 0.75 and 0.50 for reader 2; and greater than 5 spaces yielded a sensitivity and specificity of 0.75 and 0.58 for reader 1 and 0.69 and 0.70 for reader 2. CONCLUSION: CT findings associated with intervention in hemoperitoneum due to ovarian cyst rupture include size of hemoperitoneum, number of abdominopelvic spaces with hemoperitoneum, and contrast extravasation.
Asunto(s)
Hemoperitoneo , Quistes Ováricos , Femenino , Hemoperitoneo/diagnóstico por imagen , Hemoperitoneo/etiología , Hemoperitoneo/terapia , Humanos , Quistes Ováricos/complicaciones , Quistes Ováricos/diagnóstico por imagen , Quistes Ováricos/terapia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Rotura Espontánea/complicaciones , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X/efectos adversosRESUMEN
PURPOSE: To investigate the feasibility, safety, and absorbed-dose distribution of prostatic artery radioembolization (RE) in a canine model. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fourteen male castrated beagles received dihydroandrosterone/estradiol to induce prostatic hyperplasia for the duration of the study. Each dog underwent fluoroscopic prostatic artery catheterization. Yttrium-90 (90Y) microspheres (TheraSphere; Boston Scientific, Marlborough, Massachusetts) were delivered to 1 prostatic hemigland (dose escalation from 60 to 200 Gy), with the contralateral side serving as a control. Assessments for adverse events were performed throughout the follow-up (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v5.0). Positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance (MR) imaging provided a confirmation after the delivery of absorbed-dose distribution. MR imaging was performed before and 3, 20, and 40 days after RE. Tissue harvest of the prostate, rectum, bladder, urethra, penis, and neurovascular bundles was performed 60 days after RE. RESULTS: All the animals successfully underwent RE. Positron emission tomography/MR imaging demonstrated localization to and good coverage of only the treated hemigland. No adverse events occurred. The MR imaging showed a significant dose-dependent decrease in the treated hemigland size at 40 days (25%-60%, P < .001). No extraprostatic radiographic changes were observed. Necropsy demonstrated no gross rectal, urethral, penile, or bladder changes. Histology revealed RE-induced changes in the treated prostatic tissues of the highest dose group, with gland atrophy and focal necrosis. No extraprostatic RE-related histologic findings were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Prostate 90Y RE is safe and feasible in a canine model and leads to focal dose-dependent changes in the gland without inducing unwanted extraprostatic effects. These results suggest that an investigation of nonoperative prostate cancer is warranted.
Asunto(s)
Braquiterapia , Embolización Terapéutica , Neoplasias de la Próstata , Animales , Perros , Humanos , Masculino , Próstata , Neoplasias de la Próstata/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias de la Próstata/radioterapia , Radioisótopos de ItrioRESUMEN
Gallbladder carcinoma is the most common cancer of the biliary system. It is challenging to diagnose because patients are often asymptomatic or present with nonspecific symptoms that mimic common benign diseases. Surgical excision is the only curative therapy and is best accomplished at early non-locally advanced stages. Unfortunately, gallbladder cancer often manifests at late locally advanced stages, precluding cure. Early tumors are often incidentally detected at imaging or at cholecystectomy performed for another indication. Typical imaging features of localized disease include asymmetric gallbladder wall thickening, polyps larger than 1.0 cm, and a solid mass replacing the gallbladder lumen. Advanced tumors are often infiltrative and can be confusing at CT and MRI owing to their large size. Determination of the origin of the lesion is paramount to narrow the differential diagnosis but is often challenging. It is important to identify gallbladder cancer and distinguish it from other benign and malignant hepatobiliary processes. Since surgical resection is the only curative treatment option, radiologist understanding and interpretation of pathways of nodal and infiltrative tumor spread can direct surgery or preclude patients who may not benefit from surgery. While both CT and MRI are effective, MRI provides superior soft-tissue characterization of the gallbladder and biliary tree and is a useful imaging tool for diagnosis, staging, and evaluation of treatment response. ©RSNA, 2020.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Vesícula Biliar , Colecistectomía , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Vesícula Biliar , Neoplasias de la Vesícula Biliar/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias de la Vesícula Biliar/cirugía , Humanos , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , RadiólogosRESUMEN
Transarterial radioembolization (TARE) with yttrium 90 has increasingly been performed to treat hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). TARE was historically used as a palliative lobar therapy for patients with advanced HCC beyond surgical options, ablation, or transarterial chemoembolization, but recent advancements have led to its application across the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer staging paradigm. Newer techniques, termed radiation lobectomy and radiation segmentectomy, are being performed before liver resection to facilitate hypertrophy of the future liver remnant, before liver transplant to bridge or downstage to transplant, or as a definite curative treatment. Imaging assessment of therapeutic response to TARE is challenging as the intent of TARE is to deliver local high-dose radiation to tumors through microembolic microspheres, preserving blood flow to promote radiation injury to the tumor. Because of the microembolic nature, early imaging assessment after TARE cannot rely solely on changes in size. Knowledge of the evolving methods of TARE along with the tools to assess posttreatment imaging and response is essential to optimize TARE as a therapeutic option for patients with HCC. ©RSNA, 2021.
Asunto(s)
Braquiterapia , Carcinoma Hepatocelular , Quimioembolización Terapéutica , Neoplasias Hepáticas , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/diagnóstico por imagen , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/radioterapia , Humanos , Neoplasias Hepáticas/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias Hepáticas/radioterapia , MicroesferasRESUMEN
The purpose of this review is to explain how diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) is used during magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) exams in pregnant patients for specific maternal indications, including evaluation of acute pelvic pain, adnexal masses, cancer diagnosis and staging, and morbidly adherent placenta. While ultrasound is often the appropriate initial imaging for evaluating a pregnant patient, MRI can be helpful when a pelvic ultrasound is indeterminate. MRI has advantages in that it does not use ionizing radiation and has shown no known deleterious effects to the fetus. The use of gadolinium-based contrast is controversial during pregnancy. DWI is a functional sequence performed during an MRI exam, which is valuable in the absence of gadolinium contrast, and can increase the visibility of inflammation, abscesses, and tumors. Case examples will be presented to demonstrate the utility and added value of DWI over conventional anatomic T1- and T2-weighted imaging in diagnosis of maternal disease in the pregnant patient's pelvis.
Asunto(s)
Imagen de Difusión por Resonancia Magnética , Dolor Pélvico/diagnóstico por imagen , Pelvis/diagnóstico por imagen , Complicaciones del Embarazo/diagnóstico por imagen , Enfermedad Aguda , Apendicitis/diagnóstico por imagen , Enfermedad de Crohn/diagnóstico por imagen , Imagen de Difusión por Resonancia Magnética/métodos , Femenino , Humanos , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética/métodos , Dolor Pélvico/etiología , Enfermedades Placentarias/diagnóstico por imagen , Embarazo , Enfermedades Uterinas/diagnóstico por imagenRESUMEN
Does imaging response predict survival in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC)? We studied the ability of posttherapeutic imaging response to predict overall survival. Over 14 years, 948 patients with HCC were treated with radioembolization. Patients with baseline metastases, vascular invasion, multifocal disease, Child-Pugh > B7, and transplanted/resected were excluded. This created our homogeneous study cohort of 134 patients with Child-Pugh ≤ B7 and solitary HCC. Response (using European Association for Study of the Liver [EASL] and Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors 1.1 [RECIST 1.1] criteria) was associated with survival using Landmark and risk-of-death methodologies after reviewing 960 scans. In a subanalysis, survival times of responders were compared to those of patients with stable disease (SD) and progressive disease (PD). Uni/multivariate survival analyses were performed at each Landmark. At the 3-month Landmark, responders survived longer than nonresponders by EASL (hazard ratio [HR], 0.46; confidence interval [CI], 0.26-0.82; P = 0.002) but not RECIST 1.1 criteria (HR, 0.70; CI, 0.37-1.32; P = 0.32). At the 6-month Landmark, responders survived longer than nonresponders by EASL (HR, 0.32; CI, 0.15-0.77; P < 0.001) and RECIST 1.1 criteria (HR, 0.50; CI, 0.29-0.87; P = 0.021). At the 12-month Landmark, responders survived longer than nonresponders by EASL (HR, 0.34; CI, 0.15-0.77; P < 0.001) and RECIST 1.1 criteria (HR, 0.52; CI 0.27-0.98; P = 0.049). At 6 months, risk of death was lower for responders by EASL (P < 0.001) and RECIST 1.1 (P = 0.0445). In subanalyses, responders lived longer than patients with SD or PD. EASL response was a significant predictor of survival at 3-, 6-, and 12-month Landmarks on uni/multivariate analyses. CONCLUSION: Response to radioembolization in patients with solitary HCC can prognosticate improved survival. EASL necrosis criteria outperformed RECIST 1.1 size criteria in predicting survival. The therapeutic objective of radioembolization should be radiologic response and not solely to prevent progression. (Hepatology 2018;67:873-883).
Asunto(s)
Carcinoma Hepatocelular/terapia , Embolización Terapéutica/métodos , Neoplasias Hepáticas/terapia , Anciano , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/mortalidad , Femenino , Humanos , Neoplasias Hepáticas/mortalidad , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética/métodos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis de Supervivencia , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X/métodos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
Yttrium-90 transarterial radioembolization (TARE) is a locoregional therapy (LRT) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). In this study, we present overall survival (OS) outcomes in a 1,000-patient cohort acquired over a 15-year period. Between December 1, 2003 and March 31, 2017, 1,000 patients with HCC were treated with TARE as part of a prospective cohort study. A comprehensive review of toxicity and survival outcomes was performed. Outcomes were stratified by baseline Child-Pugh (CP) class, United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS), and Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) staging systems. Albumin and bilirubin laboratory toxicities were compared to baseline. OS outcomes were reported using censoring and intention-to-treat methodologies. All treatments were outpatient, with a median one treatment per patient. Five hundred six (51%) were CP A, 450 (45%) CP B, and 44 (4%) CP C. Two hundred sixty-three (26%) patients were BCLC A, 152 (15%) B, 541 (54%) C, and 44 (4%) D. Three hundred sixty-eight (37%) were UNOS T1/T2, 169 (17%) T3, 147 (15%) T4a, 223 (22%) T4b, and 93 (9%) N/M. In CP A patients, censored OS for BCLC A was 47.3 (confidence interval [CI], 39.5-80.3) months, BCLC B 25.0 (CI, 17.3-30.5) months, and BCLC C 15.0 (CI, 13.8-17.7) months. In CP B patients, censored OS for BCLC A was 27 (CI, 21-30.2) months, BCLC B 15.0 (CI, 12.3-19.0) months, and BCLC C 8.0 (CI, 6.8-9.5) months. Forty-nine (5%) and 110 (11%) patients developed grade 3/4 albumin and bilirubin toxicities, respectively. CONCLUSION: Based on our experience with 1,000 patients over 15 years, we have made a decision to adopt TARE as the first-line transarterial LRT for patients with HCC. Our decision was informed by prospective data and incrementally reported demonstrating outcomes stratified by BCLC, applied as either neoadjuvant or definitive treatment. (Hepatology 2017).
Asunto(s)
Braquiterapia/métodos , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/radioterapia , Neoplasias Hepáticas/radioterapia , Radioisótopos de Itrio/uso terapéutico , Adulto , Anciano , Análisis de Varianza , Instituciones Oncológicas , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/diagnóstico , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/mortalidad , Estudios de Cohortes , Toma de Decisiones , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Neoplasias Hepáticas/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Hepáticas/mortalidad , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis Multivariante , Invasividad Neoplásica/patología , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Traumatismos por Radiación/prevención & control , Dosificación Radioterapéutica , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Tasa de Supervivencia , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
Intraluminal pathologic conditions of the bile ducts and gallbladder are common, most frequently consisting of calculi and adenocarcinoma. In recent years, intraductal papillary neoplasm of the bile ducts (IPN-B), which is analogous to intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm of the pancreas, has been recognized as a distinct pathologic entity and a precursor lesion to adenocarcinoma of the bile ducts. Intraductal tubulopapillary neoplasm (ITPN) of the bile duct was subsequently described as a distinct pathologic entity. With increased awareness and advances in imaging techniques, these lesions are diagnosed with increased frequency at preoperative imaging. A similar neoplasm in the gallbladder is referred to as intracholecystic papillary neoplasm. These lesions are often diagnosed at a preinvasive stage and have a better prognosis than invasive cholangiocarcinoma when treated with curative resection, underscoring the importance of an accurate imaging diagnosis. The most common causes of polypoid lesions of the gallbladder are cholesterol polyps and adenomyomatosis. These lesions need to be differentiated from the less common but clinically important adenocarcinoma of the gallbladder. Imaging is crucial to identify polyps that are at high risk for malignancy so that the appropriate management choice between imaging follow-up and cholecystectomy can be made by the treating physicians. Other less common gallbladder tumors, such as gallbladder adenomas, lymphoma, and metastases to the gallbladder, can manifest as intraluminal tumors; and awareness of these lesions is also important. In this article, the recent literature is reviewed; and the imaging appearances, histopathologic findings, and management of uncommon intraluminal tumors of the bile ducts and gallbladder and their mimics are discussed. ©RSNA, 2019.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de los Conductos Biliares/diagnóstico por imagen , Carcinoma Papilar/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias de la Vesícula Biliar/diagnóstico por imagen , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética/métodos , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X/métodos , Adenoma/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias de los Conductos Biliares/patología , Carcinoma Papilar/patología , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Femenino , Enfermedades de la Vesícula Biliar/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias de la Vesícula Biliar/patología , Humanos , Masculino , Factores de RiesgoRESUMEN
Hypertension is a common problem; if left untreated, it can result in significant complications, including those involving the cardiovascular system and end organs. Approximately 10% of patients with hypertension are classified as having secondary hypertension, defined as hypertension attributable to a specific and potentially remediable cause. The evaluation for secondary hypertension typically begins with acquiring the patient history and performing a physical examination and screening laboratory tests. Directed imaging may be performed, on the basis of laboratory test results, to assess for potential causes of secondary hypertension. The causes can be broadly classified as endocrine (eg, hyperaldosteronism, pheochromocytoma, hyperparathyroidism) and nonendocrine (eg, aortic coarctation, renal vascular hypertension). In addition, patients with hypertension can develop significant complications that also are diagnosed with imaging, including conditions involving the cardiovascular system (eg, aortic aneurysm, acute aortic syndrome) and central nervous system (eg, stroke, subarachnoid hemorrhage, and posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome). The imaging workup and imaging appearances of some of the causes of secondary hypertension are reviewed, treatment options are discussed, and the imaging appearances of hypertension-related complications are described. It is important for radiologists to accurately diagnose the secondary causes of hypertension, as many of them are treatable, and treatment may result in improved symptoms or resolution of hypertension. ©RSNA, 2019.
Asunto(s)
Hipertensión/diagnóstico por imagen , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética/métodos , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X/métodos , Enfermedades de la Aorta/complicaciones , Enfermedades de la Aorta/diagnóstico por imagen , Trastornos Cerebrovasculares/diagnóstico por imagen , Trastornos Cerebrovasculares/etiología , Angiografía por Tomografía Computarizada/métodos , Neoplasias de las Glándulas Endocrinas/complicaciones , Neoplasias de las Glándulas Endocrinas/diagnóstico , Enfermedades del Sistema Endocrino/complicaciones , Enfermedades del Sistema Endocrino/diagnóstico , Humanos , Hipertensión/etiología , Hipertensión Renal/complicaciones , Hipertensión Renal/diagnóstico por imagen , Hipertensión Renovascular/complicaciones , Hipertensión Renovascular/diagnóstico por imagen , Isquemia Miocárdica/diagnóstico por imagen , Isquemia Miocárdica/etiología , NeuroimagenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Eosinophil predominant mucosal inflammation is central to the diagnosis and activity assessment of eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE). Esophageal mural remodeling is an important consequence of EoE that is responsible for adverse events of dysphagia, food impaction, and esophageal stenosis. The aim of this study was to compare upper endoscopy (EGD) with barium upper GI study (UGI) for the detection of esophageal inflammation and remodeling in adults with EoE. METHODS: A retrospective review on a single-center database of adults with confirmed EoE identified those with EGD and UGI performed within 6 months of each another. Studies were reviewed for mucosal inflammatory and remodeling abnormalities. RESULTS: Seventy patients were included. Initial UGI results were consistent with EoE in 10% and suggestive of EoE in 39%. Review of UGI by a senior GI radiologist increased detection of changes consistent with EoE (34%). EGD identified characteristic abnormalities in 93%, which was significantly greater than UGI (67%). Inflammatory features were more frequently appreciated on EGD (74%) compared with UGI (21%). There was no significant difference in fibrostenotic changes observed on EGD (84%) versus UGI (73%). CONCLUSIONS: EGD and UGI have similar sensitivity for identifying the remodeling consequences of EoE; however, inflammatory features are better assessed on EGD. Inadequate sensitivity of UGI for composite features of EoE limits its capabilities as a diagnostic test, although radiologists' awareness significantly increases the diagnostic yield of UGI. UGI and EGD may identify fibrostenotic changes unappreciated by its counterpart and thus provide complementary information in select patients.
Asunto(s)
Esofagitis Eosinofílica/diagnóstico por imagen , Estenosis Esofágica/diagnóstico por imagen , Esofagoscopía , Esófago/diagnóstico por imagen , Esófago/patología , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Sulfato de Bario , Medios de Contraste , Trastornos de Deglución/etiología , Esofagitis Eosinofílica/complicaciones , Estenosis Esofágica/etiología , Femenino , Fibrosis , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Radiografía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
PURPOSE: To determine if rare primary malignancies of the liver may have consistent features on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This IRB-compliant retrospective study reviewed the records from the pathology departments of four university centres over an 11-year period from 2005-2016 to identify rare primary malignant tumours, which were cross-referenced with MRI records. MRI studies of these patients were reviewed to determine if these tumours exhibited consistent and distinctive features. RESULTS: Sixty patients were identified with rare primary liver tumours. The following distinctive features and frequency of occurrence were observed: mixed hepatocellular carcinoma-cholangiocarcinoma showed regions of wash-out in 7/19 of patients; 6/6 of fibrolamellar carcinomas demonstrated large heterogeneous lesions with large heterogeneous central scars; epithelioid haemangioendothelioma larger than 2 cm showed target-like enhancement in late-phase enhancement in 9/13; sarcomas excluding angiosarcoma had central necrosis in 3/9 and haemorrhage in 5/9; angiosarcomas showed centripedal progressive nodular enhancement in 3/6 and showed regions of haemorrhage in 3/6; and 7/7 of primary hepatic lymphomas showed encasement of vessels. CONCLUSION: Although helpful features for the differentiation of rare primary malignancies of the liver are identified, no MRI features appear to be specific and therefore histopathological confirmation is usually required for definitive diagnosis. KEY POINTS: ⢠No MRI features appear to be specific for rare primary liver malignancies. ⢠Haemorrhage is a helpful sign in diagnosis of primary hepatic sarcomas. ⢠Angiosarcomas may show progressive nodular enhancement towards the centre mimicking haemangioma. ⢠Vessel encasement is a helpful sign in diagnosis of primary hepatic lymphoma.