Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 56
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
BMC Womens Health ; 14: 149, 2014 Nov 30.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25434679

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Loss of fertility has been reported as an important concern of reproductive age women diagnosed with cancer. The Furthering Understanding of Cancer, Health, and Survivorship In Adult (FUCHSIA) Women's Study examines how cancer treatment affects the fertility of cancer survivors who were diagnosed during their reproductive years. In this paper we discuss the process of developing and pilot testing the FUCHSIA computer assisted telephone interview (CATI). METHODS: The CATI was developed in several phases and pilot tested twice to evaluate several aspects of the instrument including question sequencing, understandability of the questions, and women's comfort with certain questions. Participants were recruited from cancer and infertility support groups and study team contacts. RESULTS: Fifty-two women were recruited and participated in the first pilot. The participants had a mean age of 31.5 years, 17.3% had cancer, and 38.5% experienced a period of infertility. Twenty-four women participated in the second pilot with similar representation. CONCLUSIONS: The collection of detailed information on reproductive outcomes with the CATI may improve the understanding of how cancer treatment during the reproductive years affects female fertility. The pilot studies provided important information to improve the CATI before the full study. Our comprehensive recruitment strategy allowed us to interview a diverse group of women to ensure that questions and answer choices were easily interpreted, check complicated skip patterns and the flow of questions, and evaluate the length of the interview. This experience can be used to help inform others in what steps can be useful for developing telephone interviews for research studies.


Asunto(s)
Fertilidad , Encuestas Epidemiológicas/métodos , Infertilidad/etiología , Entrevistas como Asunto/métodos , Neoplasias/terapia , Sobrevivientes , Adulto , Computadores , Femenino , Humanos , Proyectos Piloto , Factores de Tiempo
2.
Am J Epidemiol ; 178(4): 610-24, 2013 Aug 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23639935

RESUMEN

Identifying associations of risk factors sharing the same pathway with disease risk is complicated by small individual effects and intercorrelated components; this can be addressed by creating comprehensive exposure scores. We developed and validated 3 novel weighting methods (literature review-derived, study data-based, and a Bayesian method that combines prior knowledge with study data) to incorporate components into a pathway score for oxidative balance in addition to a commonly used method that assumes all components contribute equally to the score. We illustrate our method using pooled data from 3 US case-control studies of sporadic colorectal adenoma (1991-2002). We created 4 oxidative balance scores (OBS) to reflect combined summary measures of dietary and nondietary antioxidant and prooxidant exposures. A higher score represents a predominance of antioxidant exposures over prooxidant exposures. In the pooled data, the odds ratios comparing the highest tertile of OBS with the lowest for adenoma risk ranged from 0.38 to 0.54 for the 4 measures; all were statistically significant. These findings suggest that 1) OBS are indicators of oxidative balance and may be inversely associated with colorectal adenoma risk and 2) using comprehensive exposure scores may be preferable to investigating individual component-disease associations for complex exposures, such as oxidative balance.


Asunto(s)
Adenoma/etiología , Neoplasias Colorrectales/etiología , F2-Isoprostanos/sangre , Estrés Oxidativo/fisiología , Adulto , Anciano , Teorema de Bayes , Biomarcadores/sangre , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Colonoscopía , Encuestas sobre Dietas , Femenino , Conductas Relacionadas con la Salud , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Factores de Riesgo , Estados Unidos
3.
J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev ; 16(3-4): 127-283, 2013.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23777200

RESUMEN

Assessment of whether pesticide exposure is associated with neurodevelopmental outcomes in children can best be addressed with a systematic review of both the human and animal peer-reviewed literature. This review analyzed epidemiologic studies testing the hypothesis that exposure to pesticides during pregnancy and/or early childhood is associated with neurodevelopmental outcomes in children. Studies that directly queried pesticide exposure (e.g., via questionnaire or interview) or measured pesticide or metabolite levels in biological specimens from study participants (e.g., blood, urine, etc.) or their immediate environment (e.g., personal air monitoring, home dust samples, etc.) were eligible for inclusion. Consistency, strength of association, and dose response were key elements of the framework utilized for evaluating epidemiologic studies. As a whole, the epidemiologic studies did not strongly implicate any particular pesticide as being causally related to adverse neurodevelopmental outcomes in infants and children. A few associations were unique for a health outcome and specific pesticide, and alternative hypotheses could not be ruled out. Our survey of the in vivo peer-reviewed published mammalian literature focused on effects of the specific active ingredient of pesticides on functional neurodevelopmental endpoints (i.e., behavior, neuropharmacology and neuropathology). In most cases, effects were noted at dose levels within the same order of magnitude or higher compared to the point of departure used for chronic risk assessments in the United States. Thus, although the published animal studies may have characterized potential neurodevelopmental outcomes using endpoints not required by guideline studies, the effects were generally observed at or above effect levels measured in repeated-dose toxicology studies submitted to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Suggestions for improved exposure assessment in epidemiology studies and more effective and tiered approaches in animal testing are discussed.


Asunto(s)
Desarrollo Infantil/efectos de los fármacos , Discapacidades del Desarrollo/inducido químicamente , Discapacidades del Desarrollo/epidemiología , Exposición a Riesgos Ambientales/efectos adversos , Hidrocarburos Clorados/toxicidad , Enfermedades del Sistema Nervioso/inducido químicamente , Enfermedades del Sistema Nervioso/epidemiología , Organofosfatos/toxicidad , Plaguicidas/toxicidad , Piretrinas/toxicidad , Animales , Arildialquilfosfatasa/metabolismo , Niño , Preescolar , DDT/envenenamiento , Diclorodifenil Dicloroetileno/envenenamiento , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Estudios de Evaluación como Asunto , Medicina Basada en la Evidencia , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Insecticidas/toxicidad , Inteligencia/efectos de los fármacos , Pruebas de Inteligencia , Aprendizaje/efectos de los fármacos , Masculino , Mamíferos , Memoria/efectos de los fármacos , Síndromes de Neurotoxicidad/epidemiología , Síndromes de Neurotoxicidad/etiología , Intoxicación por Organofosfatos/etiología , Embarazo , Estados Unidos , United States Environmental Protection Agency
4.
Health Serv Res ; 58(5): 976-987, 2023 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36622637

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To compare direct-to-consumer (DTC) telemedicine and in-person visits in rates of testing, follow-up health care use, and quality for urinary tract infections (UTIs) and sinusitis. DATA SOURCE: The Minnesota All Payer Claims Data provided 2008-2015 administrative claims data. STUDY DESIGN: Using a difference-in-differences approach, we compared episodes of care for UTIs and sinusitis among enrollees of health plans introducing coverage for DTC telemedicine relative to those without DTC telemedicine coverage. Primary outcomes included number of laboratory tests, antibiotics filled, office and outpatient visits, emergency department (ED) visits, and standardized spending, based on standardized prices of health services. DATA COLLECTION: The study sample included non-elderly enrollees of commercial health insurance plans. We constructed 30-day episodes of care initiated by a DTC telemedicine or in-person visit. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: The UTI and sinusitis samples were comprised of 215,134 and 624,630 episodes of care, respectively. Following the introduction of coverage for DTC telemedicine, 15.7% of UTI episodes and 8.9% of sinusitis episodes were initiated with DTC telemedicine. Compared to episodes without coverage for DTC telemedicine, UTI episodes with coverage had 0.25 fewer lab tests (95% CI: -0.33, -0.18; p < 0.001), lower standardized spending for the first UTI visit (-$11.18 [95% CI: -$21.62, -$0.75]; p < 0.05), and no change in office and outpatient visits, ED visits, antibiotics filled, or standardized medical spending. Sinusitis episodes with coverage for DTC telemedicine had fewer antibiotics filled (-0.08 [95% CI: -0.14, -0.01]; p < 0.05) and a very small increase in ED visits (0.001 [95% CI: 0.001, 0.010]; p < 0.05), but no change in lab tests, office and outpatient visits, or standardized medical spending. CONCLUSIONS: Among commercially insured patients, coverage of DTC telemedicine was associated with reductions in antibiotics for sinusitis and laboratory tests for UTI without changes in downstream total office and outpatient visits or changes in ED visits.


Asunto(s)
Sinusitis , Telemedicina , Infecciones Urinarias , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Infecciones Urinarias/tratamiento farmacológico , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Sinusitis/tratamiento farmacológico , Calidad de la Atención de Salud
5.
MDM Policy Pract ; 8(2): 23814683231202716, 2023.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37841496

RESUMEN

Background. To support proactive decision making during the COVID-19 pandemic, mathematical models have been leveraged to identify surveillance indicator thresholds at which strengthening nonpharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) is necessary to protect health care capacity. Understanding tradeoffs between different adaptive COVID-19 response components is important when designing strategies that balance public preference and public health goals. Methods. We considered 3 components of an adaptive COVID-19 response: 1) the threshold at which to implement the NPI, 2) the time needed to implement the NPI, and 3) the effectiveness of the NPI. Using a compartmental model of SARS-CoV-2 transmission calibrated to Minnesota state data, we evaluated different adaptive policies in terms of the peak number of hospitalizations and the time spent with the NPI in force. Scenarios were compared with a reference strategy, in which an NPI with an 80% contact reduction was triggered when new weekly hospitalizations surpassed 8 per 100,000 population, with a 7-day implementation period. Assumptions were varied in sensitivity analysis. Results. All adaptive response scenarios substantially reduced peak hospitalizations relative to no response. Among adaptive response scenarios, slower NPI implementation resulted in somewhat higher peak hospitalization and a longer time spent under the NPIs than the reference scenario. A stronger NPI response resulted in slightly less time with the NPIs in place and smaller hospitalization peak. A higher trigger threshold resulted in greater peak hospitalizations with little reduction in the length of time under the NPIs. Conclusions. An adaptive NPI response can substantially reduce infection circulation and prevent health care capacity from being exceeded. However, population preferences as well as the feasibility and timeliness of compliance with reenacting NPIs should inform response design. Highlights: This study uses a mathematical model to compare different adaptive nonpharmaceutical intervention (NPI) strategies for COVID-19 management across 3 dimensions: threshold when the NPI should be implemented, time it takes to implement the NPI, and the effectiveness of the NPI.All adaptive NPI response scenarios considered substantially reduced peak hospitalizations compared with no response.Slower NPI implementation results in a somewhat higher peak hospitalization and longer time spent with the NPI in place but may make an adaptive strategy more feasible by allowing the population sufficient time to prepare for changing restrictions.A stronger, more effective NPI response results in a modest reduction in the time spent under the NPIs and slightly lower peak hospitalizations.A higher threshold for triggering the NPI delays the time at which the NPI starts but results in a higher peak hospitalization and does not substantially reduce the time the NPI remains in force.

6.
Blood ; 116(25): 5501-6, 2010 Dec 16.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20823456

RESUMEN

Multiple myeloma (MM) is the most common hematologic malignancy in blacks. Some prior studies suggest inferior survival in blacks; others suggest similar survival. Using the original 9 Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results registries, we conducted a large-scale population-based study including 5798 black and 28 939 white MM patients diagnosed 1973-2005, followed through 2006. Age-adjusted incidence rates, disease-specific survival, and relative survival rates were calculated by race, age, and time period of diagnosis. Mean age at diagnosis was 65.8 and 69.8 years for blacks and whites, respectively (P < .001). Incidence among blacks was m twice that among whites; this disparity was greater among patients < 50 years (P = .002). Over the entire study period, disease-specific and relative survival rates were higher in blacks than whites (P < .001). For whites, 5-year relative survival rates increased significantly 1973-1993 to 1994-1998 (26.3% to 30.8%; P < .001) and 1994-1998 to 1999-2005 (30.8% to 35.0%; P = .004). Survival improvements among blacks were smaller and nonsignificant (1973-1993 to 1999-2005: 31.0% to 34.1%; P = .07). We found (1) a younger age of onset among blacks; (2) better survival in blacks 1973-2005; and (3) significant survival improvement among whites over time, with smaller, nonsignificant change seen among blacks, possibly due to unequal access to and/or disparate responsiveness to novel therapies.


Asunto(s)
Población Negra/estadística & datos numéricos , Disparidades en Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Mieloma Múltiple/etnología , Población Blanca/estadística & datos numéricos , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Mieloma Múltiple/terapia , Programa de VERF , Tasa de Supervivencia , Resultado del Tratamiento
7.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22571222

RESUMEN

Chlorpyrifos (CPF) is one of the most widely used organophosphate insecticides in the United States. By December 2000, nearly all residential uses were voluntarily canceled, so that today, CPF is only used to control insect pests on a variety of crops. Periodic review of the potential effects of CPF on all developmental outcomes is necessary in the United States because the Food Quality Protection Act mandates special consideration of risk assessments for infants and children. This article reviews epidemiologic studies examining the association of potential CPF exposure with growth indices, including birth weight, birth length, and head circumference, and animal studies focusing on related somatic developmental endpoints. It differs from earlier reviews by including an additional cohort study and providing in-depth systematic evaluation of the patterns of association across different studies with respect to specificity of biomarkers for CPF, consistency, dose response, strength of association, temporality, and biological plausibility (Hill 1965), as well as consideration of the potential role of effect modification and bias. The review did not identify any strong associations exhibiting consistent exposure-response patterns that were observed in more than one of the four cohort studies evaluated. In addition, the animal data indicate that developmental effects occur at doses that produce substantial maternal toxicity and red blood cell (RBC) acetylcholinesterase (AChE) inhibition. Based on consideration of both the epidemiologic and animal data, maternal RBC AChE inhibition is a more sensitive endpoint for risk assessment than somatic developmental effects reviewed in this article.


Asunto(s)
Cloropirifos/toxicidad , Desarrollo Fetal/efectos de los fármacos , Insecticidas/toxicidad , Medición de Riesgo , Animales , Biomarcadores , Peso al Nacer/efectos de los fármacos , Inhibidores de la Colinesterasa/toxicidad , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Embarazo
8.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22401178

RESUMEN

Developmental neurobehavioral outcomes attributed to exposure to chlorpyrifos (CPF) obtained from epidemiologic and animal studies published before June 2010 were reviewed for risk assessment purposes. For epidemiological studies, this review considered (1) overall strength of study design, (2) specificity of CPF exposure biomarkers, (3) potential for bias, and (4) Hill guidelines for causal inference. In the case of animal studies, this review focused on evaluating the consistency of outcomes for developmental neurobehavioral endpoints from in vivo mammalian studies that exposed dams and/or offspring to CPF prior to weaning. Developmental neuropharmacologic and neuropathologic outcomes were also evaluated. Experimental design and methods were examined as part of the weight of evidence. There was insufficient evidence that human developmental exposures to CPF produce adverse neurobehavioral effects in infants and children across different cohort studies that may be relevant to CPF exposure. In animals, few behavioral parameters were affected following gestational exposures to 1 mg/kg-d but were not consistently reported by different laboratories. For postnatal exposures, behavioral effects found in more than one study at 1 mg/kg-d were decreased errors on a radial arm maze in female rats and increased errors in males dosed subcutaneously from postnatal day (PND) 1 to 4. A similar finding was seen in rats exposed orally from PND 1 to 21 with incremental dose levels of 1, 2, and 4 mg/kg-d, but not in rats dosed with constant dose level of 1 mg/kg-d. Neurodevelopmental behavioral, pharmacological, and morphologic effects occurred at doses that produced significant brain or red blood cell acetylcholinesterase inhibition in dams or offspring.


Asunto(s)
Conducta Animal/efectos de los fármacos , Conducta Infantil/efectos de los fármacos , Desarrollo Infantil/efectos de los fármacos , Cloropirifos/toxicidad , Exposición a Riesgos Ambientales/efectos adversos , Insecticidas/toxicidad , Animales , Biomarcadores/metabolismo , Niño , Cloropirifos/metabolismo , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Conducta del Lactante/efectos de los fármacos , Insecticidas/metabolismo , Embarazo , Efectos Tardíos de la Exposición Prenatal/inducido químicamente , Medición de Riesgo , Estados Unidos
9.
Int Arch Occup Environ Health ; 85(7): 715-45, 2012 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22159924

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To systematically evaluate epidemiologic studies on pesticides and colon cancer and rectal cancer in agricultural pesticide applicator populations using a transparent "weight-of-evidence" (WOE) methodological approach. METHODS: Twenty-nine (29) publications from the Agricultural Health Study (AHS) and 13 additional epidemiologic studies were identified that reported data for pesticide applicators and/or specific pesticide compounds and colorectal, colon, or rectal cancer. The AHS evaluated pesticide applicators as well as dose-response associations for specific pesticide compounds, whereas the large majority of non-AHS evaluated applicators but did not analyze specific compounds or dose-response trends. This WOE assessment of 153 different pesticide-outcome pairs emphasized several key evidentiary features: existence of statistically significant relative risks, magnitude of observed associations, results from the most reliable exposure assessments, and evidence of convincing dose-response relationships (i.e., those monotonically increasing, with statistically significant trend tests). RESULTS: Occupation as a pesticide applicator or pesticide application as a farming-related function was not associated with increasing the risk of colon or rectal cancer. Deficits of colon or rectal cancer were observed across most studies of pesticide applicators. After applying the WOE methodology to the epidemiologic studies of specific pesticide compounds and colon or rectal cancer, a number of pesticide-outcome pairs were identified and evaluated further based on positive statistical associations. Of these, only two-aldicarb and colon cancer and imazethapyr and proximal colon cancer-appears to warrant further discussion regarding a possible causal relationship, although the epidemiologic data are limited. For the remainder, a lack of a clear dose-response trend, inconsistencies in associations between exposure metrics and comparison groups, imprecise associations, variable participation rates for analyses of specific compounds, and the reliance upon data from one study (the AHS) limit interpretation regarding risk. CONCLUSION: The available epidemiologic evidence does not support a causal relationship between occupation as a pesticide applicator or specific pesticide exposures and colon or rectal cancer.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades de los Trabajadores Agrícolas/inducido químicamente , Agricultura , Neoplasias Colorrectales/inducido químicamente , Exposición Profesional/efectos adversos , Plaguicidas/efectos adversos , Enfermedades de los Trabajadores Agrícolas/epidemiología , Estudios de Cohortes , Neoplasias Colorrectales/epidemiología , Minería de Datos , Estudios Epidemiológicos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo
10.
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol ; 63(3): 440-52, 2012 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22683395

RESUMEN

The United States Environmental Protection Agency and other regulatory agencies around the world have registered glyphosate as a broad-spectrum herbicide for use on multiple food and non-food use crops. Glyphosate is widely considered by regulatory authorities and scientific bodies to have no carcinogenic potential, based primarily on results of carcinogenicity studies of rats and mice. To examine potential cancer risks in humans, we reviewed the epidemiologic literature to evaluate whether exposure to glyphosate is associated causally with cancer risk in humans. We also reviewed relevant methodological and biomonitoring studies of glyphosate. Seven cohort studies and fourteen case-control studies examined the association between glyphosate and one or more cancer outcomes. Our review found no consistent pattern of positive associations indicating a causal relationship between total cancer (in adults or children) or any site-specific cancer and exposure to glyphosate. Data from biomonitoring studies underscore the importance of exposure assessment in epidemiologic studies, and indicate that studies should incorporate not only duration and frequency of pesticide use, but also type of pesticide formulation. Because generic exposure assessments likely lead to exposure misclassification, it is recommended that exposure algorithms be validated with biomonitoring data.


Asunto(s)
Glicina/análogos & derivados , Herbicidas/toxicidad , Neoplasias/epidemiología , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Estudios de Cohortes , Glicina/toxicidad , Humanos , Glifosato
11.
JAMA Netw Open ; 5(3): e225018, 2022 03 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35357452

RESUMEN

Importance: COVID-19 vaccines are effective, but inequities in vaccine administration and waning immunity may limit vaccine effectiveness. Objectives: To report statewide trends in vaccine administration and vaccine effectiveness in Minnesota. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study used COVID-19 vaccine data from the Minnesota Immunization Information Connection from October 25, 2020, through October 30, 2021 that were linked with electronic health record (EHR) data from health systems collaborating as part of the Minnesota EHR Consortium (MNEHRC). Participants included individuals who were seen at a participating health system in Minnesota. Exposures: Individuals were considered fully vaccinated in the second week after receipt of a second dose of a BNT162b2 or mRNA-1273 vaccine or a single dose of an Ad26.COV.2.S vaccine. Main Outcomes and Measures: A completed vaccination series and vaccine breakthrough, defined as either a positive SARS-CoV-2 polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test or a hospital admission the same week or within the 3 weeks following a positive SARS-CoV-2 PCR test. A test-negative design and incident rate ratio were used to evaluate COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness separately for the BNT162b2, mRNA-1273, and Ad26.COV.2.S vaccines. Rurality and social vulnerability index were assessed at the area level. Results: This study included 4 431 190 unique individuals at participating health systems, and 3 013 704 (68%) of the individuals were fully vaccinated. Vaccination rates were lowest among Minnesotans who identified as Hispanic (116 422 of 217 019 [54%]), multiracial (30 066 of 57 412 [52%]), American Indian or Alaska Native (22 190 of 41 437 [54%]), and Black or African American (158 860 of 326 595 [49%]) compared with Minnesotans who identified as Asian or Pacific Islander (159 999 of 210 994 [76%]) or White (2 402 928 of 3 391 747 [71%]). Among individuals aged 19 to 64 years, vaccination rates were lower in rural areas (196 479 of 308 047 [64%]) compared with urban areas (151 541 of 1 951 265 [77%]) and areas with high social vulnerability (544 433 of 774 952 [70%]) compared with areas with low social vulnerability (571 613 of 724 369 [79%]). In the 9 weeks ending October 30, 2021, vaccine effectiveness as assessed by a test-negative design was 33% (95% CI, 30%-37%) for Ad26.COV.2.S; 53% (95% CI, 52%-54%) for BNT162b2; and 66% (95% CI, 65%-67%) for mRNA-1273. For SARS-CoV-2-related hospitalizations, vaccine effectiveness in the 9 weeks ending October 30, 2021, was 78% (95% CI, 75%-81%) for Ad26.COV.2.S; 81% (95% CI, 79%-82%) for BNT162b2; and 81% (95% CI, 79%-82%) for mRNA-1273. Conclusions and Relevance: This cohort study of data from a Minnesota statewide consortium suggests disparities in vaccine administration and effectiveness. Vaccine effectiveness against infection was lower for Ad26.COV.2.S and BNT162b2 but was associated with protection against SARS-CoV-2-related hospitalizations despite the increased prevalence of the Delta variant in Minnesota.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Vacunas Virales , Vacuna nCoV-2019 mRNA-1273 , Adulto , Vacuna BNT162 , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/prevención & control , Vacunas contra la COVID-19 , Estudios de Cohortes , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , SARS-CoV-2 , Adulto Joven
12.
Public Health Rep ; 137(2): 263-271, 2022.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35060411

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Robust disease and syndromic surveillance tools are underdeveloped in the United States, as evidenced by limitations and heterogeneity in sociodemographic data collection throughout the COVID-19 pandemic. To monitor the COVID-19 pandemic in Minnesota, we developed a federated data network in March 2020 using electronic health record (EHR) data from 8 multispecialty health systems. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this serial cross-sectional study, we examined patients of all ages who received a COVID-19 polymerase chain reaction test, had symptoms of a viral illness, or received an influenza test from January 3, 2016, through November 7, 2020. We evaluated COVID-19 testing rates among patients with symptoms of viral illness and percentage positivity among all patients tested, in aggregate and by zip code. We stratified results by patient and area-level characteristics. RESULTS: Cumulative COVID-19 positivity rates were similar for people aged 12-64 years (range, 15.1%-17.6%) but lower for adults aged ≥65 years (range, 9.3%-10.7%). We found notable racial and ethnic disparities in positivity rates early in the pandemic, whereas COVID-19 positivity was similarly elevated across most racial and ethnic groups by the end of 2020. Positivity rates remained substantially higher among Hispanic patients compared with other racial and ethnic groups throughout the study period. We found similar trends across area-level income and rurality, with disparities early in the pandemic converging over time. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: We rapidly developed a distributed data network across Minnesota to monitor the COVID-19 pandemic. Our findings highlight the utility of using EHR data to monitor the current pandemic as well as future public health priorities. Building partnerships with public health agencies can help ensure data streams are flexible and tailored to meet the changing needs of decision makers.


Asunto(s)
Prueba de COVID-19/estadística & datos numéricos , COVID-19/diagnóstico , Recolección de Datos/métodos , Registros Electrónicos de Salud/organización & administración , Desarrollo de Programa , Estudios Transversales , Humanos , Minnesota/epidemiología , Vigilancia en Salud Pública , SARS-CoV-2 , Vigilancia de Guardia , Determinantes Sociales de la Salud , Factores Sociodemográficos
13.
Public Health Nutr ; 14(2): 261-70, 2011 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20633314

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the relationship between egg consumption and CHD and stroke mortality using the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 1988-1994 (NHANES III) and follow-up survey. DESIGN: A cross-sectional survey using a stratified, multi-stage probability sample was analysed, adjusting for survey design. Egg consumption was obtained from the FFQ and separated into categories of egg intake. Hazard ratios (HR) were calculated for CHD and stroke mortality using multivariate Cox regression models. SETTING: A health and nutrition survey conducted in the USA from 1988 to 1994 with follow-up through 31 December 2000. SUBJECTS: The study population included men and women who were free of CVD and had completed a FFQ at baseline. RESULTS: Multivariate models adjusting for health, lifestyle and dietary factors indicated that 'high' egg consumption (≥ 7 times/week v. <1 time/week) was not associated with significantly increased CHD mortality (HR = 1·13, 95 % CI 0·61, 2·11 (men); HR = 0·92, 95 % CI 0·27, 3·11 (women)). There was a statistically significant inverse association between 'high' egg consumption and stroke mortality among men (HR = 0·27, 95 % CI 0·10, 0·73), but the estimate was imprecise because of sparse data. We did not observe a statistically significant positive association between 'high' egg consumption and CHD or stroke mortality in analyses restricted to individuals with diabetes, but these analyses may be limited due to the small number of diabetics. CONCLUSIONS: We did not find a significant positive association between egg consumption and increased risk of mortality from CHD or stroke in the US population. These results corroborate the findings of previous studies.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/mortalidad , Huevos , Accidente Cerebrovascular/mortalidad , Adolescente , Adulto , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/epidemiología , Estudios Transversales , Diabetes Mellitus , Huevos/efectos adversos , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Análisis Multivariante , Encuestas Nutricionales , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Estudios Prospectivos , Análisis de Regresión , Factores de Riesgo , Factores Sexuales , Accidente Cerebrovascular/epidemiología , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Adulto Joven
14.
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol ; 61(2): 172-84, 2011 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21798302

RESUMEN

The United States (US) Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and other regulatory agencies around the world have registered glyphosate as a broad-spectrum herbicide for use on multiple food and non-food use crops. To examine potential health risks in humans, we searched and reviewed the literature to evaluate whether exposure to glyphosate is associated causally with non-cancer health risks in humans. We also reviewed biomonitoring studies of glyphosate to allow for a more comprehensive discussion of issues related to exposure assessment and misclassification. Cohort, case-control and cross-sectional studies on glyphosate and non-cancer outcomes evaluated a variety of endpoints, including non-cancer respiratory conditions, diabetes, myocardial infarction, reproductive and developmental outcomes, rheumatoid arthritis, thyroid disease, and Parkinson's disease. Our review found no evidence of a consistent pattern of positive associations indicating a causal relationship between any disease and exposure to glyphosate. Most reported associations were weak and not significantly different from 1.0. Because accurate exposure measurement is crucial for valid results, it is recommended that pesticide-specific exposure algorithms be developed and validated.


Asunto(s)
Exposición a Riesgos Ambientales/efectos adversos , Exposición a Riesgos Ambientales/estadística & datos numéricos , Glicina/análogos & derivados , Herbicidas/envenenamiento , Animales , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Estudios de Cohortes , Estudios Transversales , Glicina/envenenamiento , Glicina/toxicidad , Herbicidas/toxicidad , Humanos , Medición de Riesgo/métodos , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , United States Environmental Protection Agency , Glifosato
15.
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev ; 30(4): 727-735, 2021 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33531434

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Population-based cancer registries provide a resource to recruit young adult cancer survivors who may not be easily identified otherwise. METHODS: We compared demographic and cancer-related characteristics of participants in a cohort of female young adult cancer survivors to those of eligible survivors in the Georgia Cancer Registry, a population-based registry in the United States. We examined associations between survivor characteristics and nonparticipation using logistic regression and associations between survivor characteristics and different types of nonparticipation (refusal, unable to contact, or unresolved vs. interviewed) using polytomous regression. RESULTS: The Georgia Cancer Registry was able to contact 60% of eligible women (3,061/5,137). Of those, 78% agreed to study contact (n = 2,378), and of those, 56% were interviewed (n = 1,342). Participation was similar across age at contact and at diagnosis but varied across cancer type from 17% for cervical cancer to 32% for breast cancer. White women were slightly more likely to be interviewed (28%) than African American women (23%), which was mostly attributable to greater difficulty in contacting African American women (odds ratio 1.7, 95% confidence interval: 1.5-2.1). CONCLUSIONS: The greatest challenge to recruiting women was contacting them, which differed across some but not all demographic and cancer-related characteristics. When successfully contacted, most survivors agreed to participate. IMPACT: Population-based cancer registries can serve as an invaluable resource to recruit representative samples of young adult cancer survivors, who are otherwise difficult to identify.


Asunto(s)
Supervivientes de Cáncer/estadística & datos numéricos , Sistema de Registros , Análisis de Supervivencia , Adulto , Métodos Epidemiológicos , Femenino , Georgia , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad
16.
Epidemiology ; 21(1): 95-102, 2010 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20010212

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: We conducted a meta-analysis of occupational studies of trichloroethylene-exposed workers to evaluate patterns of associations by study design, exposure assessment methods, and occupational groups. METHODS: Estimates of summary relative risk (RR) were calculated using inverse-variance weighting methods. Cohort studies were classified as group I or group II, depending on quality of the study design and exposure assessment procedures. We conducted sensitivity analyses to examine sources of heterogeneity. RESULTS: Across all studies meeting our inclusion criteria (n = 23), the summary RR was 1.42 (95% confidence interval = 1.17-1.77), with heterogeneity present (test for heterogeneity: P = 0.001). After removal of 3 outlier studies, the summary RR for the remaining studies was 1.24 (1.06-1.45 (test for heterogeneity: P = 0.616)). The summary RR for studies of workers who were identified as more likely exposed to trichloroethylene (group I studies) was 1.34 (1.06-1.68). With outlier studies removed, the group II summary RR estimates for the cohort studies was 0.88 (0.58-1.33) and for the case-control studies was 1.33 (1.02-1.73). The summary RR for studies that used biomarkers to classify exposure (n = 3) was 1.02 (0.59-1.77) and for studies of aerospace/aircraft workers (n = 7) was 1.14 (0.84-1.57). CONCLUSIONS: Positive associations were observed across various study groups. However, considerations of unmeasured potential confounding, lack of quantitative exposure assessment and lack of exposure-response patterns limit epidemiologic insight into the role of trichloroethylene exposure and its potential causal association with kidney cancer.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Renales/inducido químicamente , Exposición Profesional/efectos adversos , Tricloroetileno/efectos adversos , Factores de Confusión Epidemiológicos , Estudios Epidemiológicos , Femenino , Humanos , Neoplasias Renales/epidemiología , Masculino , Medición de Riesgo
17.
Nutr J ; 9: 50, 2010 Nov 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21044319

RESUMEN

Over the past decade, several large epidemiologic investigations of meat intake and prostate cancer have been published. Therefore, a meta-analysis of prospective studies was conducted to estimate potential associations between red or processed meat intake and prostate cancer. Fifteen studies of red meat and 11 studies of processed meat were included in the analyses. High vs. low intake and dose-response analyses were conducted using random effects models to generate summary relative risk estimates (SRRE). No association between high vs. low red meat consumption (SRRE = 1.00, 95% CI: 0.96-1.05) or each 100 g increment of red meat (SRRE = 1.00, 95% CI: 0.95-1.05) and total prostate cancer was observed. Similarly, no association with red meat was observed for advanced prostate cancer (SRRE = 1.01, 95% CI: 0.94-1.09). A weakly elevated summary association between processed meat and total prostate cancer was found (SRRE = 1.05, 95% CI: 0.99-1.12), although heterogeneity was present, the association was attenuated in a sub-group analysis of studies that adjusted for multiple potential confounding factors, and publication bias likely affected the summary effect. In conclusion, the results of this meta-analysis are not supportive of an independent positive association between red or processed meat intake and prostate cancer.


Asunto(s)
Dieta/efectos adversos , Productos de la Carne/efectos adversos , Carne/efectos adversos , Neoplasias de la Próstata/etiología , Estudios de Cohortes , Grasas de la Dieta/efectos adversos , Humanos , Masculino , Estudios Prospectivos , Factores de Riesgo
18.
Nutr Res Rev ; 23(2): 349-65, 2010 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21110906

RESUMEN

The relationship between meat consumption and breast cancer has been the focus of several epidemiological investigations, yet there has been no clear scientific consensus as to whether red or processed meat intake increases the risk of breast cancer. We conducted a comprehensive meta-analysis incorporating data from several recently published prospective studies of red or processed meat intake and breast cancer. In the meta-analysis utilising data from the Pooling Project publication (includes data from eight cohorts) combined with data from nine studies published between 2004 and 2009 and one study published in 1996, the fixed-effect summary relative risk estimate (SRRE) for red meat intake (high v. low) and breast cancer was 1·02 (95 % CI 0·98, 1·07; P value for heterogeneity = 0·001) and the random-effects SRRE was 1·07 (95 % CI 0·98, 1·17). The SRRE for each 100 g increment of red meat was 1·04 (95 % CI 1·00, 1·07), based on a fixed-effects model, and 1·12 (95 % CI 1·03, 1·23) based on a random-effects model. No association was observed for each 100 g increment of red meat among premenopausal women (SRRE 1·01; 95 % CI 0·92, 1·11) but a statistically significant SRRE of 1·22 (95 % CI 1·04, 1·44) was observed among postmenopausal women using a random-effects model. However, the association for postmenopausal women was attenuated and non-significant when using a fixed-effects model (SRRE 1·03; 95 % CI 0·98, 1·08). The fixed- and random-effect SRRE for high (v. low) processed meat intake and breast cancer were 1·00 (95 % CI 0·98, 1·01; P value for heterogeneity = 0·005) and 1·08 (95 % CI 1·01, 1·16), respectively. The fixed- and random-effect SRRE for each 30 g increment of processed meat were 1·03 (95 % CI 1·00, 1·06) and 1·06 (95 % CI 0·99, 1·14), respectively. Overall, weak positive summary associations were observed across all meta-analysis models, with the majority being non-statistically significant. Heterogeneity was evident in most analyses, summary associations were sensitive to the choice of analytical model (fixed v. random effects), and publication bias appeared to have produced slightly elevated summary associations. On the basis of this quantitative assessment, red meat and processed meat intake does not appear to be independently associated with increasing the risk of breast cancer, although further investigations of potential effect modifiers, such as analyses by hormone receptor status, may provide valuable insight to potential patterns of associations.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama/etiología , Dieta , Carne/efectos adversos , Femenino , Manipulación de Alimentos , Humanos , Menopausia , Factores de Riesgo
19.
Nutr Res Rev ; 23(1): 169-79, 2010 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20181297

RESUMEN

The objective of the present review was to examine the potential association between animal fat intake and breast cancer. We conducted a meta-analysis and review of epidemiological cohort studies, including data reported in the Pooling Project publication of Prospective Studies of Diet and Cancer. Random- and fixed-effects models were utilised to generate summary relative risk estimates (SRRE), and sensitivity and influence analyses were conducted. In the meta-analysis that included data reported in the Pooling Project publication of prospective cohorts (n 8) and subsequent publications of cohort studies (n 3), no significant association was observed comparing the highest category of animal fat intake with the lowest (SRRE 1.03; 95 % CI: 0.76, 1.40). Similarly, no significant association between a 5 % increment of energy from animal fat intake and breast cancer (SRRE 1.02; 95 % CI 0.97, 1.07) was observed in the meta-analysis of these studies. In conclusion, the results of the present quantitative assessment are not supportive of a positive independent association between consumption of animal fat and breast cancer, although findings may be sensitive to the type of dietary instrument used in cohort studies.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama/epidemiología , Grasas de la Dieta/administración & dosificación , Animales , Estudios de Cohortes , Modelos Animales de Enfermedad , Ingestión de Energía , Femenino , Humanos , MEDLINE , Posmenopausia , Estudios Prospectivos
20.
Am J Ind Med ; 52(3): 210-20, 2009 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19097081

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Occupational sprain and strain injuries are one of the most common types of nonfatal occupational injuries and a significant source of lost workdays. This study examines factors associated with severe work-related sprain/strain injuries to the back, shoulder, and knees. METHODS: A synthetic case-control study was performed (controls were selected from the same pool of utility workers as cases). Cases included all electric utility workers who had experienced a severe work-related sprain/strain injury to the back, knee, or shoulder. Primary controls were selected from all workers who had sustained a minor injury. Secondary controls were selected from employees with a minor sprain/strain injury to the back, knee, or shoulder. Multivariate logistic regression models were used to estimate odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals. RESULTS: Workers 41 years and older were more likely to have experienced severe shoulder sprain/strain injuries [Age 41-50: OR = 3.62, 95% CI: 1.71-7.65; age 51 and older: OR = 4.49, 95% CI: 1.89-10.67] and severe back sprain/strain injuries [Age 41-50: OR = 1.70, 95% CI: 1.06-2.33; age 51 and older: OR = 1.5, 95% CI: 0.90-2.52]. Line workers and maintenance workers had an increased risk of serious sprain/strain injuries. Gender and day of week were not significantly associated with sprain/strain injuries. DISCUSSION: Though this study is limited by available data, future studies may benefit from this preliminary examination of occupational and demographic characteristics associated with serious sprain/strain injuries among electric utility workers.


Asunto(s)
Traumatismos del Brazo/epidemiología , Traumatismos de la Espalda/epidemiología , Traumatismos de la Rodilla/epidemiología , Enfermedades Profesionales/clasificación , Esguinces y Distensiones/clasificación , Absentismo , Accidentes de Trabajo , Adulto , Distribución por Edad , Factores de Edad , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Medición de Riesgo , Articulación del Hombro , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA