The rising tide of revisional surgery: tracking changes in index cases among bariatric-accredited fellowships.

BACKGROUND: The field of bariatric surgery has seen peaks and troughs in the types of metabolic procedures performed. Our primary aim was to evaluate bariatric case volumes among fellows enrolled in bariatric Fellowship Council (FC)-accredited programs. Our secondary aim was to assess trends in revisional case volumes. METHODS: We reviewed de-identified FC case logs for all bariatric surgery-accredited programs from 2010 through 2019. The number of primary sleeve gastrectomy, gastric band, gastric bypass, biliopancreatic diversion, and major revisional bariatric surgical procedures (defined as a revision with creation of a new anastomosis) were graphed for each academic year. Fellows were stratified into quartiles based on the number of revisional operations per year and graphed over ten years. Volumes of primary gastric bypass, major revisions, and total anastomotic cases were compared over time using ANOVA with p < 0.05 considered significant. RESULTS: Case volumes for 822 fellows were evaluated. Sleeve gastrectomy had a significant surge in 2010 and plateaued in 2016. The fellows' number of primary gastric bypasses had a non-significant decrease from 84 to 75 cases/fellow from 2010 to 2019. This decrease was offset by a significant increase in major revisional surgery from 8 to 19 cases/fellow. As a result, the number of anastomotic cases did not change significantly over the study time period. Interestingly, as revisional volume has grown, the gap between quartiles of fellowship programs has widened with the 95th percentile growing at a much faster rate than lower quartiles. CONCLUSION: The volume of bariatric procedures performed in the last decade among FC fellows follows similar trends to national data. Major revisional cases have doubled with the most robust growth isolated to a small number of programs. As revisional surgery continues to increase, applicants interested in a comprehensive bariatric practice should seek out training programs that offer strong revisional experience.

A Competency-based Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Curriculum Significantly Improves General Surgery Residents' Operative Performance and Decreases Skill Variability: Cohort Study.

OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate the feasibility of implementing a CBE curriculum within a general surgery residency program and to evaluate its effectiveness in improving resident skill. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Operative skill variability affects residents and practicing surgeons and directly impacts patient outcomes. CBE can decrease this variability by ensuring uniform skill acquisition. We implemented a CBE LC curriculum to improve resident performance and decrease skill variability. METHODS: PGY-2 residents completed the curriculum during monthly rotations starting in July 2017. Once simulator proficiency was reached, residents performed elective LCs with a select group of faculty at 3 hospitals. Performance at curriculum completion was assessed using LC simulation metrics and intraoperative operative performance rating system scores and compared to both baseline and historical controls, comprised of rising PGY-3s, using a 2-sample Wilcoxon rank-sum test. PGY-2 group's performance variability was compared with PGY-3s using Levene robust test of equality of variances; P < 0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: Twenty-one residents each performed 17.52 ± 4.15 consecutive LCs during the monthly rotation. Resident simulated and operative performance increased significantly with dedicated training and reached that of more experienced rising PGY-3s (n = 7) but with significantly decreased variability in performance ( P = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Completion of a CBE rotation led to significant improvements in PGY-2 residents' LC performance that reached that of PGY-3s and decreased performance variability. These results support wider implementation of CBE in resident training.

A comparison of laparoscopic and robotic ergonomic risk.

INTRODUCTION: Work related injuries in minimally invasive surgery (MIS) are common because of the strains placed on the surgeon's or assistant's body. The objective of this study was to compare specific ergonomic risks among surgeons and surgical trainees performing robotic and laparoscopic procedures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ergonomic data and discomfort questionnaires were recorded from surgeons and trainees (fellows/residents) for both robotic and laparoscopic procedures. Perceived discomfort questionnaires were recorded pre/postoperatively. Intraoperatively, biomechanical loads were captured using motion tracking sensors and electromyography (EMG) sensors. Perceived discomfort, body position and muscle activity were compared between robotic and laparoscopic procedures using a linear regression model. RESULTS: Twenty surgeons and surgical trainees performed 29 robotic and 48 laparoscopic procedures. Postoperatively, increases in right finger numbness and right shoulder stiffness and surgeon irritability were noted after laparoscopy and increased back stiffness after robotic surgery. Further, the laparoscopic group saw increases in right hand/shoulder pain (OR 0.8; p = 0.032) and left hand/shoulder pain (0.22; p < 0.001) compared to robotic. Right deltoid and trapezius excessive muscle activity were significantly higher in laparoscopic operations compared to robotic. Demanding and static positioning was similar between the two groups except there was significantly more static neck position required for robotic operations. CONCLUSION: Robotic assisted surgeries led to lower postoperative discomfort and muscle strain in both upper extremities, particularly dominant side of the surgeon, but increased static neck positioning with subjective back stiffness compared with laparoscopy. These recognized ergonomic differences between the two platforms can be used to raise surgeon awareness of their intraoperative posture and to develop targeted physical and occupational therapy interventions to decrease surgeon WMSDs and increase surgeon longevity.

Travel distance reduces follow-up compliance but has no effect on long-term weight loss success in bariatric patients.

BACKGROUND: Patients seeking bariatric surgery are traveling longer distances to reach Bariatric Centers. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of travel distance on adherence to follow-up and outcomes after bariatric surgery. METHODS: A retrospective review of all consecutive patients who had undergone bariatric surgery from June 2013 to May 2014 was performed, and the patients were divided into two groups: those who traveled 50 miles or less and those who traveled more than 50 miles. Primary outcome assessed was the influence of distance on post-operative follow-up attrition over 4-year period. Secondary outcomes assessed were excess weight loss, length of stay (LOS), complications and readmission rates. RESULTS: A total of 228 patients underwent bariatric surgery with 4 years of follow-up available. Of these, 145 patients traveled 50 miles or less and 83 patients traveled greater than 50 miles. Patient demographics were similar between the two groups. Those who traveled more had statistically higher probability of attrition up to 3-year follow-up mark. There was no difference in percent excess weight loss at each follow-up visit between the two cohorts. Furthermore, there was no difference in readmission rates (2% vs 5%), minor complications (14% vs 10%), major complications (3% vs 2%) and LOS (2.6 days vs 2.6). CONCLUSION: The distance patients traveled for bariatric surgery did not affect their weight loss success, length of stay, postsurgical complications or readmission rate. Despite the lack of influence on postoperative outcomes, follow-up compliance was statistically affected by distance.

Factors associated with weight regain post-bariatric surgery: a systematic review.

INTRODUCTION: To systematically review the literature to assess the incidence and risk factors of weight regain (WR) after bariatric surgery. Bariatric surgery is the most effective intervention for sustained weight loss of morbidly obese patients, but WR remains a concern. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A PRISMA compliant systematic literature review was performed using the PubMed database, Embase and the Cochrane Library in July of 2019. Studies that reported ≥ 10% WR after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) and sleeve gastrectomy (SG) were included. The Newcastle-Ottawa scale (NOS) was used for assessing study quality. RESULTS: Out of 2915 retrieved abstracts, 272 full papers were reviewed, and 32 studies included (25 of high and 7 of fair quality) reporting weight outcomes on 7391 RYGB and 5872 SG patients. 17.6% (95% CI 16.9-18.3) had a WR ≥ 10%. Risk factors related with WR fell into 5 categories, namely anatomical, genetic, dietary, psychiatric, and temporal. Specifically, gastrojejunal stoma diameter, gastric volume following sleeve, anxiety, time after surgery, sweet consumption, emotional eating, portion size, food urges, binge eating, loss of control/disinhibition when eating, and genetics have been positively associated with WR while postprandial GLP-1, eagerness to change physical activity habits, self-esteem, social support, fruit and zinc consumption, HDL, quality of life have been negatively associated. CONCLUSION: At least 1 in 6 patients after bariatric surgery had ≥ 10% WR. This review identified several factors related to WR that can be used to counsel patients preoperatively and direct postoperative strategies that minimize WR risk.

What delays your case start? Exploring operating room inefficiencies.

INTRODUCTION: Improving operating room (OR) inefficiencies benefits the OR team, hospital, and patients alike but the available literature is limited. Our goal was, using a novel surgical application, to identify any OR incidents that cause delays from the time the patient enters the OR till procedure start (preparatory phase). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted an IRB approved, prospective, observational study between July 2018 and January 2019. Using a novel surgical application (ExplORer Surgical) three observers recorded disrupting incidents and their duration during the preparatory phase of a variety of general surgery cases. Specifically, the number and duration of anesthesia delays, unnecessary/distracting conversations, missing items, and other delays were recorded from the moment they started until they stopped affecting the normal workflow. RESULTS: Ninety-six OR cases were assessed. 20 incidents occurred in 18 (19%) of those cases. The average preparatory duration for all the cases was 20.7 ± 8.6 min. Cases without incidents lasted 19.5 ± 7.4 min while cases with incidents lasted 25.9 ± 11.2 min, p = 0.03. The average incident lasted 3.7 min, approximately 18% of the preparatory phase duration. CONCLUSION: The use of the ExplORer Surgical app allowed us to accurately record the incidents happening during the preparatory phase of various general surgery operations. Such incidents significantly prolonged the preparatory duration. The identification of those inefficiencies is the first step to targeted interventions that may eventually optimize the efficiency of preoperative preparation.

Bariatric surgery outcomes: is age just a number?

INTRODUCTION: Obesity and its associated comorbidities represent a pervasive problem in the United States across all age groups. There are conflicting data regarding the effectiveness and postoperative recovery of bariatric surgery in elderly patients. The aim of this study was to compare outcomes of bariatric surgery across age groups. MATERIALS AND METHODS: After obtaining institutional review board approval, patients with morbid obesity who underwent non-revisional laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) and sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) at our institution between 2011 and 2015 were included in this retrospective study. Patients were subdivided into five age groups: < 30, 30-39, 40-49, 50-59, and ≥ 60 years. Patient baseline demographics and comorbidities were collected. Postoperative outcomes including reinterventions/reoperations, 30-day-readmissions, 90-day-mortality, comorbidities' resolution, and change in BMI (ΔBMI) up to 4 years were recorded and compared. The groups were compared with ANOVA and chi-square tests and multivariable analyses. RESULTS: LRYGB was performed in 74.7% of the 1026 study patients. Patients ≥ 60 years old demonstrated lower preoperative BMI than patients < 50 years (p < 0.001). Patients 50-59 years old had increased length of stay compared to 30-39 (p = 0.003) and a higher prevalence of all comorbidities was found in older patients (p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in 30-day-readmissions; 90-day-mortality; reoperations; and reinterventions among the study groups. The ΔBMI was higher in younger patients and comorbidity resolution was more likely in younger patients with the exception of obstructive sleep apnea. CONCLUSION: Bariatric surgery can be accomplished safely across all age groups with satisfiable postoperative weight loss. However, older age had higher hospital stay and convalescence and lower comorbidity resolution compared to younger patients. Thus, bariatric surgery should be offered earlier in life to allow the patients to reap its benefits.

Continuous, integrated sensors for predicting fatigue during non-repetitive work: demonstration of technique in the operating room.

Surface electromyography (sEMG) can monitor muscle activity and potentially predict fatigue in the workplace. However, objectively measuring fatigue is challenging in complex work with unpredictable work cycles where sEMG may be influenced by the dynamically changing posture demands. This study proposes a multi-modal approach integrating sEMG with motion sensors and demonstrates the approach in the live surgical work environment. Seventy-two exposures from twelve participants were collected, including self-reported musculoskeletal discomfort, sEMG, and postures. Posture sensors were used to identify time windows where the surgeon was static and in non-demanding positions, and mean power frequencies (MPF) were then calculated during those time windows. In 57 out of 72 exposures (80%), participants experienced an increase in musculoskeletal discomfort. Integrated (multi-modality) measurements showed better performance than single-modality (sEMG) measurements in detecting decreases in MPF, a predictor of fatigue. Based on self-reported musculoskeletal discomfort, sensor-based thresholds for identifying fatigue are proposed for the trapezius and deltoid muscle groups. Practitioner summary Work-related fatigue is one of the intermediate risk factors to musculoskeletal disorders. This article presents an objective integrated approach to identify musculoskeletal fatigue using wearable sensors. The presented approach could be implemented by ergonomists to identify musculoskeletal fatigue more accurately and in a variety of workplaces. Abbreviations: sEMG: surface electromyography; IMU: inertia measurement unit; MPF: mean power frequency; ACGIH: American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists; SAGES: Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons; LD: left deltoid; LT: left trapezius; RD: right deltoid; RT: right trapezius.

Proving the Effectiveness of the Fundamentals of Robotic Surgery (FRS) Skills Curriculum: A Single-blinded, Multispecialty, Multi-institutional Randomized Control Trial.

OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate the noninferiority of the fundamentals of robotic surgery (FRS) skills curriculum over current training paradigms and identify an ideal training platform. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: There is currently no validated, uniformly accepted curriculum for training in robotic surgery skills. METHODS: Single-blinded parallel-group randomized trial at 12 international American College of Surgeons (ACS) Accredited Education Institutes (AEI). Thirty-three robotic surgery experts and 123 inexperienced surgical trainees were enrolled between April 2015 and November 2016. Benchmarks (proficiency levels) on the 7 FRS Dome tasks were established based on expert performance. Participants were then randomly assigned to 4 training groups: Dome (n = 29), dV-Trainer (n = 30), and DVSS (n = 32) that trained to benchmarks and control (n = 32) that trained using locally available robotic skills curricula. The primary outcome was participant performance after training based on task errors and duration on 5 basic robotic tasks (knot tying, continuous suturing, cutting, dissection, and vessel coagulation) using an avian tissue model (transfer-test). Secondary outcomes included cognitive test scores, GEARS ratings, and robot familiarity checklist scores. RESULTS: All groups demonstrated significant performance improvement after skills training (P < 0.01). Participating residents and fellows performed tasks faster (DOME and DVSS groups) and with fewer errors than controls (DOME group; P < 0.01). Inter-rater reliability was high for the checklist scores (0.82-0.97) but moderate for GEARS ratings (0.40-0.67). CONCLUSIONS: We provide evidence of effectiveness for the FRS curriculum by demonstrating better performance of those trained following FRS compared with controls on a transfer test. We therefore argue for its implementation across training programs before surgeons apply these skills clinically.

Supporting Surgical Teams: Identifying Needs and Barriers for Exoskeleton Implementation in the Operating Room.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to identify potential needs and barriers related to using exoskeletons to decrease musculoskeletal (MS) symptoms for workers in the operating room (OR). BACKGROUND: MS symptoms and injuries adversely impact worker health and performance in surgical environments. Half of the surgical team members (e.g., surgeons, nurses, trainees) report MS symptoms during and after surgery. Although the ergonomic risks in surgery are well recognized, little has been done to develop and sustain effective interventions. METHOD: Surgical team members (n = 14) participated in focus groups, performed a 10-min simulated surgical task with a commercial upper-body exoskeleton, and then completed a usability questionnaire. Content analysis was conducted to determine relevant themes. RESULTS: Four themes were identified: (1) characteristics of individuals, (2) perceived benefits, (3) environmental/societal factors, and (4) intervention characteristics. Participants noted that exoskeletons would benefit workers who stand in prolonged, static postures (e.g., holding instruments for visualization) and indicated that they could foresee a long-term decrease in MS symptoms with the intervention. Specifically, raising awareness of exoskeletons for early-career workers and obtaining buy-in from team members may increase future adoption of this technology. Mean participant responses from the System Usability Scale was 81.3 out of 100 (SD = 8.1), which was in the acceptable range of usability. CONCLUSION: Adoption factors were identified to implement exoskeletons in the OR, such as the indicated need for exoskeletons and usability. Exoskeletons may be beneficial in the OR, but barriers such as maintenance and safety to adoption will need to be addressed. APPLICATION: Findings from this work identify facilitators and barriers for sustained implementation of exoskeletons by surgical teams.

Evaluation of operating room inefficiencies and their impact on operating room duration using a surgical app.

BACKGROUND: Efficient utilization of the operating room (OR) is essential. Inefficiencies are thought to cause preventable delays. Our goal was to identify OR incidents causing delays and estimate their impact on the duration of various general surgery procedures. MATERIALS: Three trained observers prospectively collected intraoperative data using the ExplORer Surgical app, a tool that helped capture incidents causing delays. The impact of each incident on case duration was assessed using multivariable analysis. RESULTS: 151 general surgery procedures were observed. The mean number of incidents was 2.7 per each case that averaged 109min. On average, each incident caused a 2.8 â€‹min delay (p â€‹< â€‹0.001), however, some incidents were associated with longer delays. The procedural step of each procedure most susceptible to incidents was also defined. CONCLUSION: The identification of the type of incidents and the procedural step during which they occur may allow targeted interventions to optimize OR efficiency and decrease operative time.

High Rates of Nicotine Use Relapse and Ulcer Development Following Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass.

PURPOSE: Given that smoking is known to contribute to gastrojejunal anastomotic (GJA) ulcers, cessation is recommended prior to laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB). However, smoking relapse rates and the exact ulcer risk remain unknown. This study aimed to define smoking relapse, risk of GJA ulceration, and complications after LRYGB. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent primary LRYGB during 2011-2015. Initially, three patient categories were identified: lifetime non-smokers, patients who were smoking during the initial visit at the bariatric clinic or within the prior year (recent smokers), and patients who had ceased smoking more than a year prior to their initial clinic visit (former smokers). Smoking relapse, GJA ulcer occurrences, reinterventions, and reoperations were recorded and compared. RESULTS: A total of 766 patients were included in the analysis. After surgery, 53 (64.6%) recent smokers had resumed smoking. Out of these relapsed smokers, 51% developed GJA ulcers compared with 14.8% in non-relapsed recent smokers, 16.1% in former smokers, and 6% in lifetime nonsmokers (p < 0.001). Furthermore, relapsed smokers required more frequently endoscopic reinterventions (60.4%) compared with non-relapsed smokers (20.8%, p < 0.001), former smokers (20.7%, p < 0.001), and lifetime non-smokers (15.4%, p < 0.001). Additionally, relapsed smokers required a reoperation (18.9%) more often than non-relapsed recent smokers (5.7%, p < 0.001) and lifetime non-smokers (1.3%, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Smokers relapse frequently after LRYGB, and the majority experience GJA complications. They should be counseled about this risk preoperatively and directed towards less ulcerogenic procedures when possible. Alternatively, longer periods of preoperative smoking abstinence might be needed.

An analysis of the ergonomic risk of surgical trainees and experienced surgeons during laparoscopic procedures.

BACKGROUND: Work-related musculoskeletal injuries have been increasingly recognized to affect surgeons. It is unknown whether such injuries also affect surgical trainees. The purpose of this study was to assess the ergonomic risk of surgical trainees as compared with that of experienced surgeons. METHODS: Ergonomic data were recorded from 9 surgeons and 11 trainees. Biomechanical loads during surgery were assessed using motion tracking sensors and electromyography sensors. Demanding and static positions of the trunk, neck, right/left shoulder, as well as activity from the deltoid and trapezius muscles bilaterally were recorded. In addition, participants reported their perceived discomfort on validated questionnaires. RESULTS: A total of 87 laparoscopic general surgery cases (48 attendings and 39 trainees) were observed. Both trainees and attendings spent a similarly high percentage of each case in static (>60%) and demanding positions (>5%). Even though residents reported overall more discomfort, all participants shared similar ergonomic risk with the exception of trainees' trunk being more static (odds ratio: -11.42, P = .006). CONCLUSION: Surgeons are prone to ergonomic risk. Trainees are exposed to similar postural ergonomic risk as surgeons but report more discomfort and, given that musculoskeletal injuries are cumulative over time, the focus should be on interventions to reduce ergonomic risk in the operating room.

Can a brief assessment of social support predict outcomes after bariatric surgery?

Social support is important to optimize bariatric surgery outcomes, but limited tools exist for brief and effective assessment preoperatively. The aims of the study were to determine the extent to which two ratings of social support can predict bariatric surgery outcomes, and to examine any associations between these two methods.In this retrospective study, patients were included for whom the Cleveland clinic behavioral rating system (CCBRS) and Flanagan quality of life scale (FQoLS) scores were obtained as part of their preoperative psychosocial evaluation. They were followed up for 6 to 24 months after bariatric surgery. Linear and logistic regressions were performed with patients' CCBRS and FQoLS scores as independent variables, and percent excess weight loss (%EWL), length of stay (LOS), complications, readmissions and loss to follow-up as dependent variables. The prediction of CCBRS ratings from FQoLS social support items was also evaluated. A total of 415 patients were included in the analysis. There were significant associations between the CCBRS and three of the four relevant FQoLS self-ratings. As CCBRS and FQoLS scores increased, complications decreased significantly. The CCBRS alone additionally predicted decreased length of hospital stay and approached significance for predicting decreased readmission rates. There were no associations between %EWL and behavior ratings. The degree of patients' social support is associated with important bariatric surgery outcomes. It is possible to obtain this valuable information via the administration of brief assessments prior to bariatric surgery.

Vertical Banded Gastroplasty Revision to Gastric Bypass Leads to Effective Weight Loss and Comorbidity and Dysphagia Symptom Resolution.

PURPOSE: Up to 50% of patients with vertical banded gastroplasty (VBG) experience failure or complications in the mid- and long-term and present for revisional bariatric surgery. This study aimed to review our experience for patient outcomes after VBG revisions and compare their benefits to those of primary laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) operations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data from patients who underwent VBG revision between 2009 and 2015 at a center of excellence were reviewed. Patient demographics, symptoms, comorbidities, weight loss, reinterventions, reoperations, and hospital stay were analyzed and compared with those of primary LRYGB patients (control group). RESULTS: Fifty-two patients (88.5% female, 55 ± 9.6 years old) underwent revisional surgery during the study period (86.5% LRYGB, 11.5% VBG reversal, and 2% sleeve gastrectomy). Patients presented 17.3 ± 7.2 years after their VBG for weight regain (55.8%), dysphagia (19.2%), or both (25%). Patients who underwent conversion to LRYGB for weight regain and for mix-symptoms had similar weight loss to the control group (38.2 ± 11.8 vs 35.6 ± 7.7, p = 0.108), along with similar comorbidity resolution. However, even though the early (< 30 days) complication rate was similar between the two groups, the conversion group had higher 4-year reoperation rate (29% vs 9.5%, p < 0.001) and length of stay (5.4 ± 5.3 vs 2.6 ± 3.1, p < 0.001). Additionally, dysphagia resolved in all the patients of our cohort. CONCLUSIONS: VBG conversion to LRYGB leads to significant weight loss, resolution of dysphagia, and comorbidities similarly to the primary LRYGB operations. However, higher mid-term complication rates should be expected.

Comparison of operating room inefficiencies and time variability in laparoscopic gastric bypass.

BACKGROUND: Improving operating room (OR) inefficiencies has financial and operational ramifications. However, their incidence has not been systematically studied, especially in bariatric surgery. OBJECTIVES: The study aimed to identify the operational inefficiencies of the laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) procedure, specify the steps of the procedure, and investigate whether the inefficiencies are related to case-by-case variability, using a surgical application. SETTING: University Hospital, United States METHODS: From July 2018 to January 2019, we observed consecutive nonrevisional LRYGB cases. We used a surgical application to capture in real-time all the inefficiencies/incidents that occurred inside the operating room. The duration and time variability, along with the number of incidents of each step, were recorded. Additionally, a multivariable analysis was conducted to investigate whether patient factors (age, race, body mass index, and American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status classification), surgeon and surgical-technician experience, resident-assist, and case difficulty affect the number of incidents. RESULTS: Forty LRYGB procedures were observed. The duration of the procedural steps was linearly correlated with the number of incidents but case-to-case step duration variability was not. The steps that were linked with more inefficiencies included jejunojejunostomy creation that included more unrelated to the case conversations, and gastric pouch creation that had more anesthesia-related delays. Inefficiencies such as equipment malfunctions and missing supplies were equally distributed among all the steps. Multivariable analysis did not indicate that any of the tested factors were associated with the number of incidents. CONCLUSION: The use of the surgical app allowed us to accurately record the duration, variability, and the undesired incidents of each LRYGB procedural step. Future studies should target interventions to minimize the inefficient procedural steps we have identified to optimize operating room efficiency.

Do Mandated Weight Loss Goals Prior to Bariatric Surgery Improve Postoperative Outcomes?

BACKGROUND: Most patients pursuing bariatric surgery undergo mandated preoperative weight management programs. The purpose of this study was to assess whether preoperative mandated weight loss goals lead to improved perioperative morbidity, postoperative weight loss, and resolution of comorbidities. METHODS: Data from patients who underwent primary laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB), and laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) between October 2012 and October of 2015 was reviewed. Patients were divided in two groups: those with BMI of 35-45 were not required to achieve a weight loss goal prior to surgery (no-WLG group) while those with BMI > 45 were given a weight loss goal proportionate to their weight (WLG group). Body mass index (BMI), history of diabetes mellitus type-II (DM-II), hypertension (HTN), hyperlipidemia (HLD), and obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) were recorded at baseline and 4 years postoperatively. Length of hospital stay (LOS) and reinterventions were considered proxies for postoperative morbidity. RESULTS: A total of 776 patients, 81.4% LRYGB, were included in the study (age 45.1 ± 11.9). There was no difference in %ΔBMI, DM-II, HDL, HTN, LOS, or reinterventions among the two groups at 4 years postoperatively in both LRNY and LSG patients. This lack of difference persisted even when patients with similar BMI (43-45 vs 45.01-47) were compared. CONCLUSION: WLG group did not have decreased perioperative morbidity, nor improved weight loss and comorbidity resolution 4 years after surgery. While these findings should also be confirmed by multicenter trials, they question the value of mandated WLG prior to bariatric surgery as they seem ineffective and may limit patient access to surgery.

Web-Based Educational Seminars Compare Favorably with In-House Seminars for Bariatric Surgery Patients.

BACKGROUND: Comprehensive preparative patient education is a key element in bariatric patient success. The primary objective of this study was to compare attrition rates, demographics, and surgery outcomes between patients who participated in the online vs in-house preparative seminars. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed involving patients who chose to participate in online vs in-house educational seminar between July of 2014 and December of 2016. The patients were divided into two groups based on their choice of educational seminar and tracked to see how many made it to an initial visit and to surgery. In those who had bariatric surgery, data was collected on age, type of insurance, length of stay (LOS), longest follow-up, and change in body mass index. RESULTS: Total of 1230 patients were included in this study. There was no difference in attrition rate to initial consultation visit (29.1% vs 29.9%), but there was a statistically higher attrition to surgery in the in-house seminar attendees (72.9%) compared to online participants (66.6%, p < 0.05). Between January 2015 and December 2016, 291 patients underwent primary bariatric surgery. The online group was on average 3 years younger which was statistically significant. There were no differences in LOS, longest follow-up, and weight loss at 12 months between the groups. CONCLUSION: When comparing attrition rates and bariatric surgery outcomes, no overall difference was noted between patients who received web- or hospital-based preparative education. Bariatric programs should provide access to online seminars to attract younger population and save resources and cost.