Robotic eTEP versus IPOM evaluation: the REVEAL multicenter randomized clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: For small to medium-sized ventral hernias, robotic intraperitoneal onlay mesh (rIPOM) and enhanced-view totally extraperitoneal (eTEP) repair have emerged as acceptable approaches that each takes advantage of robotic instrumentation. We hypothesized that avoiding mesh fixation in a robotic eTEP repair offers an advantage in early postoperative pain compared to rIPOM. METHODS: This is a multi-center, randomized clinical trial for patients with midline ventral hernias ≤ 7 cm, who were randomized to rIPOM or robotic eTEP. The primary outcome was pain (0-10) on the first postoperative day. Secondary outcomes included same-day discharge, length of stay, opioid consumption, quality of life, surgeon workload, and cost. RESULTS: Between November 2019 and November 2021, 100 patients were randomized (49 rIPOM, 51 eTEP) among 5 surgeons. Pain on the first postoperative day [median (IQR): 5 (4-6) vs. 5 (3.5-7), p = 0.66] was similar for rIPOM and eTEP, respectively, a difference maintained following adjustments for surgeon, operative time, baseline pain, and patient co-morbidities (difference 0.28, 95% CI - 0.63 to 1.19, p = 0.56). No differences in pain on the day of surgery, 7, and 30 days after surgery were identified. Same-day discharge, length of stay, opioid consumption, and 30-day quality of life were also comparable, though rIPOM required less surgeon workload (p < 0.001), shorter operative time [107 (86-139) vs. 165 (129-212) min, p < 0.001], and resulted in fewer surgical site occurrences (0 vs. 8, p = 0.004). The total direct costs for rIPOM and eTEP were comparable [$8282 (6979-11835) vs. $8680 (7550-10282), p = 0.52] as the cost savings for eTEP attributable to mesh use [$442 (434-485) vs. $69 (62-76), p = < 0.0001] were offset by increased expenses for operative time [$669 (579-861) vs. $1075 (787-1367), p < 0.0001] and use of more robotic equipment [$760 (615-933) vs. $946 (798-1203), p = 0.001]. CONCLUSION: The avoidance of fixation in a robotic eTEP repair did not reveal a benefit in postoperative pain to offset the shorter operative time and surgeon workload offered by rIPOM.

Open Retromuscular Lateral Abdominal Wall Hernia Repair: Algorithmic Approach and Long-Term Outcomes at a Single Center.

BACKGROUND: Lateral abdominal wall hernias are relatively rare and present unique challenges to repair. Our group has developed an algorithm for repair based on several anatomic characteristics identified on preoperative imaging. Herein, we report our algorithm and outcomes of a large series of open retromuscular lateral abdominal wall hernia repairs. STUDY DESIGN: Open retromuscular lateral abdominal wall hernia repairs performed at our institution from August 2014 through April 2021 were identified in the Abdominal Core Health Quality Collaborative. Hernia characteristics, etiology, operative techniques, postoperative outcomes, and long-term patient-reported outcomes were extracted from the Abdominal Core Health Quality Collaborative database, chart review, and telephone follow-up. RESULTS: Of 464 patients who underwent hernia repair, 121 with isolated lateral abdominal wall hernias (L1-4) and mean follow-up of 34 ± 24 months had a clinical recurrence rate of 0.9% (n = 1) and bulge rate of 37% (n = 42). The median Hernia-Related Quality of Life Survey and PROMIS pain intensity scores improved 37 and 9 points, respectively. Another 343 patients with lateral (L1-4) and midline (M1-5) abdominal wall hernias and mean follow-up of 29 ± 21 months had a clinical recurrence rate of 6% (n = 20) and bulge rate of 35% (n = 117). The median Hernia-Related Quality of Life Survey and PROMIS pain intensity scores improved by 43 and 16 points, respectively. CONCLUSION: We present an algorithm for open retromuscular lateral abdominal wall hernia repair with relatively low anatomic recurrence rates and substantial improvement in patient-reported quality of life and pain. Notably, postoperative bulging is commonly reported by patients, likely due to underlying denervation injuries from the original incision.