Optimal minimum MU for intensity-modulated proton therapy with pencil-beam scanning proton beams.

PURPOSE: A higher minimum monitor unit (minMU) for pencil-beam scanning proton beams in intensity-modulated proton therapy is preferred for more efficient delivery. However, plan quality may be compromised when the minMU is too large. This study aimed to identify the optimal minMU (OminMU) to improve plan delivery efficiency while maintaining high plan quality. METHODS: We utilized clinical plans including six anatomic sites (brain, head and neck, breast, lung, abdomen, and prostate) from 23 patients previously treated with the Varian ProBeam system. The minMU of each plan was increased from the current clinical minMU of 1.1 to 3-24 MU depending on the daily prescribed dose (DPD). The dosimetric parameters of the plans were evaluated for consistency against a 1.1-minMU plan for target coverage as well as organs-at-risk dose sparing. DPD/minMU was defined as the ratio of DPD to minMU (cGy/MU) to find the OminMU by ensuring that dosimetric parameters did not differ by >1% compared to those of the 1.1-minMU plan. RESULTS: All plans up to 5 minMU showed no significant dose differences compared to the 1.1-minMU plan. Plan qualities remained acceptable when DPD/minMU ≥35 cGy/MU. This suggests that the 35 cGy/MU criterion can be used as the OminMU, which implies that 5 MU is the OminMU for a conventional fraction dose of 180 cGy. Treatment times were decreased by an average of 32% (max 56%, min 7%) and by an average of 1.6 min when the minMU was increased from 1.1 to OminMU. CONCLUSION: A clinical guideline for OminMU has been established. The minMU can be increased by 1 MU for every 35 cGy of DPD without compromising plan quality for most cases analyzed in this study. Significant treatment time reduction of up to 56% was observed when the suggested OminMU is used.

Is noncoplanar plan more robust to inter-fractional variations than coplanar plan in treating bilateral HN tumors with pencil-beam scanning proton beams?

PURPOSE: Noncoplanar plans (NCPs) are commonly used for proton treatment of bilateral head and neck (HN) malignancies. NCP requires additional verification setup imaging between beams to correct residual errors of robotic couch motion, which increases imaging dose and total treatment time. This study compared the quality and robustness of NCPs with those of coplanar plans (CPs). METHODS AND MATERIALS: Under an IRB-approved study, CPs were created retrospectively for 10 bilateral HN patients previously treated with NCPs maintaining identical beam geometry of the original plan but excluding couch rotations. Plan robustness to the inter-fractional variation (IV) of both plans was evaluated through the Dose Volume Histograms (DVH) of weekly quality assurance CT (QACT) sets (39 total). In addition, delivery efficiency for both plans was compared using total treatment time (TTT) and beam-on time (BOT). RESULTS: No significant differences in plan quality were observed in terms of clinical target volume (CTV) coverage (D95) or organ-at-risk (OAR) doses (p > 0.4 for all CTVs and OARs). No significant advantage of NCPs in the robustness to IV was found over CP, either. Changes in D95 of QA plans showed a linear correlation (slope = 1.006, R2  > 0.99) between NCP and CP for three CTV data points (CTV1, CTV2, and CTV3) in each QA plan (117 data points for 39 QA plans). NCPs showed significantly higher beam delivery time than CPs for TTT (539 ± 50 vs. 897 ± 142 s; p < 0.001); however, no significant differences were observed for BOT. CONCLUSION: NCPs are not more robust to IV than CPs when treating bilateral HN tumors with pencil-beam scanning proton beams. CPs showed plan quality and robustness similar to NCPs while reduced treatment time (∼6 min). This suggests that CPs may be a more efficient planning technique for bilateral HN cancer proton therapy.

Evaluation of treatment planning system accuracy in estimating the stopping-power ratio of immobilization devices for proton therapy.

PURPOSE: To assess treatment planning system (TPS) accuracy in estimating the stopping-power ratio (SPR) of immobilization devices commonly used in proton therapy and to evaluate the dosimetric effect of SPR estimation error for a set of clinical treatment plans. METHODS: Computed tomography scans of selected clinical immobilization devices were acquired. Then, the water-equivalent thickness (WET) and SPR values of these devices based on the scans were estimated in a commercial TPS. The reference SPR of each device was measured using a multilayer ion chamber (MLIC), and the differences between measured and TPS-estimated SPRs were calculated. These findings were utilized to calculate corrected dose distributions of 15 clinical proton plans for three treatment sites: extremity, abdomen, and head-and-neck. The original and corrected dose distributions were compared using a set of target and organs-at-risk (OARs) dose-volume histogram (DVH) parameters. RESULTS: On average, the TPS-estimated SPR was 19.5% lower (range, -35.1% to 0.2%) than the MLIC-measured SPR. Due to the relatively low density of most immobilization devices used, the WET error was typically <1 mm, but up to 2.2 mm in certain devices. Overriding the SPR of the immobilization devices to the measured values did not result in significant changes in the DVH metrics of targets and most OARs. However, some critical OARs showed noticeable changes of up to 6.7% in maximum dose. CONCLUSIONS: The TPS tends to underestimate the SPR of selected proton immobilization devices by an average of about 20%, but this does not induce major WET errors because of the low density of the devices. The dosimetric effect of this SPR error was negligible for most treatment sites, although the maximum dose of a few OARs exhibited noticeable variations.

Is a weekly qualitative picket fence test sufficient? A proposed alternate EPID-based weekly MLC QA program.

PURPOSE: Well-designed routine multileaf collimator (MLC) quality assurance (QA) is important to assure external-beam radiation treatment delivery accuracy. This study evaluates the clinical necessity of a comprehensive weekly (C-Weekly) MLC QA program compared to the American Association of Physics in Medicinerecommended weekly picket fence test (PF-Weekly), based on our seven-year experience with weekly MLC QA. METHODS: The C-Weekly MLC QA program used in this study includes 5 tests to analyze: (1) absolute MLC leaf position; (2) interdigitation MLC leaf position; (3) picket fence MLC leaf positions at static gantry angle; (4) minimum leaf-gap setting; and (5) volumetric-modulated arc therapy delivery. A total of 20,226 QA images from 16,855 tests (3,371 tests × 5) for 11 linacs at 5 photon clinical sites from May 2014 to June 2021 were analyzed. Failure mode and effects analysis was performed with 5 failure modes related to the 5 tests. For each failure mode, a risk probability number (RPN) was calculated for a C-Weekly and a PF-Weekly MLC QA program. The probability of occurrence was evaluated from statistical analyses of the C-Weekly MLC QA. RESULTS: The total number of failures for these 16,855 tests was 143 (0.9%): 39 (27.3%) for absolute MLC leaf position, 13 (9.1%) for interdigitation position, 9 (6.3%) for static gantry picket fence, 2 (1.4%) for minimum leaf-gap setting, and 80 (55.9%) for VMAT delivery. RPN scores for PF-Weekly MLC QA ranged from 60 to 192 and from 48 to 96 for C-Weekly MLC QA. CONCLUSION: RPNs for the 5 failure modes of MLC QA tests were quantitatively determined and analyzed. A comprehensive weekly MLC QA is imperative to lower the RPNs of the 5 failure modes to the desired level (<125); those from the PF-Weekly MLC QA program were found to be higher (>125). This supports the clinical necessity for comprehensive weekly MLC QA.

A comparison of two pencil beam scanning treatment planning systems for proton therapy.

OBJECTIVE: Analytical dose calculation algorithms for Eclipse and Raystation treatment planning systems (TPS), as well as a Raystation Monte Carlo model are compared to corresponding measured point doses. METHOD: The TPS were modeled with the same beam data acquired during commissioning. Thirty-five typical plans were made with each planning system, 31 without range shifter and four with a 5 cm range shifter. Point doses in these planes were compared to measured doses. RESULTS: The mean percentage difference for all plans between Raystation and Eclipse were 1.51 ± 1.99%. The mean percentage difference for all plans between TPS models and measured values are -2.06 ± 1.48% for Raystation pencil beam (PB), -0.59 ± 1.71% for Eclipse and -1.69 ± 1.11% for Raystation monte carlo (MC). The distribution for the patient plans were similar for Eclipse and Raystation MC with a P-value of 0.59 for a two tailed unpaired t-test and significantly different from the Raystation PB model with P = 0.0013 between Raystation MC and PB. All three models faired markedly better if plans with a 5 cm range shifter were ignored. Plan comparisons with a 5 cm range shifter give differences between Raystation and Eclipse of 3.77 ± 1.82%. The mean percentage difference for 5 cm range shifter plans between TPS models and measured values are -3.89 ± 2.79% for Raystation PB, -0.25 ± 3.85% for Eclipse and 1.55 ± 1.95% for Raystation MC. CONCLUSION: Both Eclipse and Raystation PB TPS are not always accurate within ±3% for a 5 cm range shifters or for small targets. This was improved with the Raystation MC model. The point dose calculations of Eclipse, Raystation PB, and Raystation MC compare within ±3% to measured doses for the other scenarios tested.

Dosimetric Evaluation and Reproducibility of Breath-hold Plans in Intensity Modulated Proton Therapy: An Initial Clinical Experience.

Purpose: Breath-hold (BH) technique can mitigate target motion, minimize target margins, reduce normal tissue doses, and lower the effect of interplay effects with intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT). This study presents dosimetric comparisons between BH and nonbreath-hold (non-BH) IMPT plans and investigates the reproducibility of BH plans using frequent quality assurance (QA) computed tomography scans (CT). Methods and Materials: Data from 77 consecutive patients with liver (n = 32), mediastinal/lung (n = 21), nonliver upper abdomen (n = 20), and malignancies in the gastroesophageal junction (n = 4), that were treated with a BH spirometry system (SDX) were evaluated. All patients underwent both BH CT and 4-dimensional CT simulations. Clinically acceptable BH and non-BH plans were generated on each scan, and dose-volume histograms of the 2 plans were compared. Reproducibility of the BH plans for 30 consecutive patients was assessed using 1 to 3 QA CTs per patient and variations in dose-volume histograms for deformed target and organs at risk (OARs) volumes were compared with the initial CT plan. Results: Use of BH scans reduced initial and boost target volumes to 72% ± 20% and 70% ± 17% of non-BH volumes, respectively. Additionally, mean dose to liver, stomach, kidney, esophagus, heart, and lung V20 were each reduced to 71% to 79% with the BH technique. Similarly, small and large bowels, heart, and spinal cord maximum doses were each lowered to 68% to 84%. Analysis of 62 QA CT scans demonstrated that mean target and OAR doses using BH scans were reproducible to within 5% of their nominal plan values. Conclusions: The BH technique reduces the irradiated volume, leading to clinically significant reductions in OAR doses. By mitigating tumor motion, the BH technique leads to reproducible target coverage and OAR doses. Its use can reduce motion-related uncertainties that are normally associated with the treatment of thoracic and abdominal tumors and, therefore, optimize IMPT delivery.

Patient-specific deep learning for 3D protoacoustic image reconstruction and dose verification in proton therapy.

BACKGROUND: Protoacoustic (PA) imaging has the potential to provide real-time 3D dose verification of proton therapy. However, PA images are susceptible to severe distortion due to limited angle acquisition. Our previous studies showed the potential of using deep learning to enhance PA images. As the model was trained using a limited number of patients' data, its efficacy was limited when applied to individual patients. PURPOSE: In this study, we developed a patient-specific deep learning method for protoacoustic imaging to improve the reconstruction quality of protoacoustic imaging and the accuracy of dose verification for individual patients. METHODS: Our method consists of two stages: in the first stage, a group model is trained from a diverse training set containing all patients, where a novel deep learning network is employed to directly reconstruct the initial pressure maps from the radiofrequency (RF) signals; in the second stage, we apply transfer learning on the pre-trained group model using patient-specific dataset derived from a novel data augmentation method to tune it into a patient-specific model. Raw PA signals were simulated based on computed tomography (CT) images and the pressure map derived from the planned dose. The reconstructed PA images were evaluated against the ground truth by using the root mean squared errors (RMSE), structural similarity index measure (SSIM) and gamma index on 10 specific prostate cancer patients. The significance level was evaluated by t-test with the p-value threshold of 0.05 compared with the results from the group model. RESULTS: The patient-specific model achieved an average RMSE of 0.014 ( p < 0.05 ${{{p}}}<{0.05}$ ), and an average SSIM of 0.981 ( p < 0.05 ${{{p}}}<{0.05}$ ), out-performing the group model. Qualitative results also demonstrated that our patient-specific approach acquired better imaging quality with more details reconstructed when comparing with the group model. Dose verification achieved an average RMSE of 0.011 ( p < 0.05 ${{{p}}}<{0.05}$ ), and an average SSIM of 0.995 ( p < 0.05 ${{{p}}}<{0.05}$ ). Gamma index evaluation demonstrated a high agreement (97.4% [ p < 0.05 ${{{p}}}<{0.05}$ ] and 97.9% [ p < 0.05 ${{{p}}}<{0.05}$ ] for 1%/3  and 1%/5 mm) between the predicted and the ground truth dose maps. Our approach approximately took 6 s to reconstruct PA images for each patient, demonstrating its feasibility for online 3D dose verification for prostate proton therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Our method demonstrated the feasibility of achieving 3D high-precision PA-based dose verification using patient-specific deep-learning approaches, which can potentially be used to guide the treatment to mitigate the impact of range uncertainty and improve the precision. Further studies are needed to validate the clinical impact of the technique.

Multi-institutional consensus on machine QA for isochronous cyclotron-based systems delivering ultra-high dose rate (FLASH) pencil beam scanning proton therapy in transmission mode.

BACKGROUND: The first clinical trials to assess the feasibility of FLASH radiotherapy in humans have started (FAST-01, FAST-02) and more trials are foreseen. To increase comparability between trials it is important to assure treatment quality and therefore establish a standard for machine quality assurance (QA). Currently, the AAPM TG-224 report is considered as the standard on machine QA for proton therapy, however, it was not intended to be used for ultra-high dose rate (UHDR) proton beams, which have gained interest due to the observation of the FLASH effect. PURPOSE: The aim of this study is to find consensus on practical guidelines on machine QA for UHDR proton beams in transmission mode in terms of which QA is required, how they should be done, which detectors are suitable for UHDR machine QA, and what tolerance limits should be applied. METHODS: A risk assessment to determine the gaps in the current standard for machine QA was performed by an international group of medical physicists. Based on that, practical guidelines on how to perform machine QA for UHDR proton beams were proposed. RESULTS: The risk assessment clearly identified the need for additional guidance on temporal dosimetry, addressing dose rate (constancy), dose spillage, and scanning speed. In addition, several minor changes from AAPM TG-224 were identified; define required dose rate levels, the use of clinically relevant dose levels, and the use of adapted beam settings to minimize activation of detector and phantom materials or to avoid saturation effects of specific detectors. The final report was created based on discussions and consensus. CONCLUSIONS: Consensus was reached on what QA is required for UHDR scanning proton beams in transmission mode for isochronous cyclotron-based systems and how they should be performed. However, the group discussions also showed that there is a lack of high temporal resolution detectors and sufficient QA data to set appropriate limits for some of the proposed QA procedures.

A high-throughput focused collimator for OAR-sparing preclinical proton FLASH studies: commissioning and validation.

Objective. To fabricate and validate a novel focused collimator designed to spare normal tissue in a murine hemithoracic irradiation model using 250 MeV protons delivered at ultra-high dose rates (UHDRs) for preclinical FLASH radiation therapy (FLASH-RT) studies.Approach. A brass collimator was developed to shape 250 MeV UHDR protons from our Varian ProBeam. Six 13 mm apertures, of equivalent size to kV x-ray fields historically used to perform hemithorax irradiations, were precisely machined to match beam divergence, allowing concurrent hemithoracic irradiation of six mice while sparing the contralateral lung and abdominal organs. The collimated field profiles were characterized by film dosimetry, and a radiation survey of neutron activation was performed to ensure the safety of staff positioning animals.Main results. The brass collimator produced 1.2 mm penumbrae radiation fields comparable to kV x-rays used in preclinical studies. The penumbrae in the six apertures are similar, with full-width half-maxima of 13.3 mm and 13.5 mm for the central and peripheral apertures, respectively. The collimator delivered a similar dose at an average rate of 52 Gy s-1for all apertures. While neutron activation produces a high (0.2 mSv h-1) initial ambient equivalent dose rate, a parallel work-flow in which imaging and setup are performed without the collimator ensures safety to staff.Significance. Scanned protons have the greatest potential for future translation of FLASH-RT in clinical treatments due to their ability to treat deep-seated tumors with high conformality. However, the Gaussian distribution of dose in proton spots produces wider lateral penumbrae compared to other modalities. This presents a challenge in small animal pre-clinical studies, where millimeter-scale penumbrae are required to precisely target the intended volume. Offering high-throughput irradiation of mice with sharp penumbrae, our novel collimator-based platform serves as an important benchmark for enabling large-scale, cost-effective radiobiological studies of the FLASH effect in murine models.

Clinical Implementation and Dosimetric Evaluation of a Robust Proton Lattice Planning Strategy Using Primary and Robust Complementary Beams.

PURPOSE: Pencil-beam scanning proton therapy has been considered as a potential modality for the 3D form of spatially-fractionated-radiation-therapy called lattice therapy. However, few practical solutions have been introduced in the clinic. Existing limitations include degradation in plan quality and robustness when using single-field versus multifield lattice plans, respectively. We propose a practical and robust proton lattice (RPL) planning method using multifield and evaluate its dosimetric characteristics compared to clinically acceptable photon lattice plans. METHODS: Seven cases previously treated with photon lattice therapy were used to evaluate a novel RPL planning technique using two-orthogonal beams: a primary beam (PB) and a robust complementary beam (RCB) that deliver 67% and 33%, respectively, of the prescribed dose to vertices inside the gross-target-volume (GTV). Only RCB is robustly optimized for setup and range uncertainties. The number and volume of vertices, peak-to-valley dose ratios (PVDRs), and volume of low dose to GTV of proton and photon plans were compared. The RPL technique was then used in treatment of two patients and their dosimetric parameters are reported. RESULTS: The RPL strategy was able to achieve the clinical planning goals. Compared to previously-treated photon plans, the average number of vertices increased by 30%, average vertex volume by 49% (18.2±25.9cc vs. 12.2±14.5cc, P=0.21), and higher PVDR (10.5±4.8 vs. 2.5±0.9, P<0.005) was achieved. In addition, RPL plans show more conformal dose with less low-dose to GTV (V30%: 60.9±7.2% vs. 81.6±13.9% and V10%: 88.3±4.5% vs. 98.6±3.6% [P<0.01]). The RPL plan for two treated patients showed PVDRs of 4.61 and 14.85 with vertices-to-GTV ratios of 1.52% and 1.30%, respectively. CONCLUSION: A novel RPL planning strategy using a pair of orthogonal beams was developed and successfully translated to the clinic. The proposed method can generate better quality plans, a higher number of vertices, and higher PVDRs than currently used photon lattice plans.

Integrating local and distant radiation-induced lung injury: Development and validation of a predictive model for ventilation loss.

BACKGROUND: Investigations on radiation-induced lung injury (RILI) have predominantly focused on local effects, primarily those associated with radiation damage to lung parenchyma. However, recent studies from our group and others have revealed that radiation-induced damage to branching serial structures such as airways and vessels may also have a substantial impact on post-radiotherapy (RT) lung function. Furthermore, recent results from multiple functional lung avoidance RT trials, although promising, have demonstrated only modest toxicity reduction, likely because they were primarily focused on dose avoidance to lung parenchyma. These observations emphasize the critical need for predictive dose-response models that effectively incorporate both local and distant RILI effects. PURPOSE: We develop and validate a predictive model for ventilation loss after lung RT. This model, referred to as P+A, integrates local (parenchyma [P]) and distant (central and peripheral airways [A]) radiation-induced damage, modeling partial (narrowing) and complete (collapse) obstruction of airways. METHODS: In an IRB-approved prospective study, pre-RT breath-hold CTs (BHCTs) and pre- and one-year post-RT 4DCTs were acquired from lung cancer patients treated with definitive RT. Up to 13 generations of airways were automatically segmented on the BHCTs using a research virtual bronchoscopy software. Ventilation maps derived from the 4DCT scans were utilized to quantify pre- and post-RT ventilation, serving, respectively, as input data and reference standard (RS) in model validation. To predict ventilation loss solely due to parenchymal damage (referred to as P model), we used a normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) model. Our model used this NTCP-based estimate and predicted additional loss due radiation-induced partial or complete occlusion of individual airways, applying fluid dynamics principles and a refined version of our previously developed airway radiosensitivity model. Predictions of post-RT ventilation were estimated in the sublobar volumes (SLVs) connected to the terminal airways. To validate the model, we conducted a k-fold cross-validation. Model parameters were optimized as the values that provided the lowest root mean square error (RMSE) between predicted post-RT ventilation and the RS for all SLVs in the training data. The performance of the P+A and the P models was evaluated by comparing their respective post-RT ventilation values with the RS predictions. Additional evaluation using various receiver operating characteristic (ROC) metrics was also performed. RESULTS: We extracted a dataset of 560 SLVs from four enrolled patients. Our results demonstrated that the P+A model consistently outperformed the P model, exhibiting RMSEs that were nearly half as low across all patients (13 ± 3 percentile for the P+A model vs. 24 ± 3 percentile for the P model on average). Notably, the P+A model aligned closely with the RS in ventilation loss distributions per lobe, particularly in regions exposed to doses ≥13.5 Gy. The ROC analysis further supported the superior performance of the P+A model compared to the P model in sensitivity (0.98 vs. 0.07), accuracy (0.87 vs. 0.25), and balanced predictions. CONCLUSIONS: These early findings indicate that airway damage is a crucial factor in RILI that should be included in dose-response modeling to enhance predictions of post-RT lung function.

Overview and Recommendations for Prospective Multi-institutional Spatially Fractionated Radiation Therapy Clinical Trials.

PURPOSE: The highly heterogeneous dose delivery of spatially fractionated radiation therapy (SFRT) is a profound departure from standard radiation planning and reporting approaches. Early SFRT studies have shown excellent clinical outcomes. However, prospective multi-institutional clinical trials of SFRT are still lacking. This NRG Oncology/American Association of Physicists in Medicine working group consensus aimed to develop recommendations on dosimetric planning, delivery, and SFRT dose reporting to address this current obstacle toward the design of SFRT clinical trials. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Working groups consisting of radiation oncologists, radiobiologists, and medical physicists with expertise in SFRT were formed in NRG Oncology and the American Association of Physicists in Medicine to investigate the needs and barriers in SFRT clinical trials. RESULTS: Upon reviewing the SFRT technologies and methods, this group identified challenges in several areas, including the availability of SFRT, the lack of treatment planning system support for SFRT, the lack of guidance in the physics and dosimetry of SFRT, the approximated radiobiological modeling of SFRT, and the prescription and combination of SFRT with conventional radiation therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Recognizing these challenges, the group further recommended several areas of improvement for the application of SFRT in cancer treatment, including the creation of clinical practice guidance documents, the improvement of treatment planning system support, the generation of treatment planning and dosimetric index reporting templates, and the development of better radiobiological models through preclinical studies and through conducting multi-institution clinical trials.

Technical note: Determination of proton linear energy transfer from the integral depth dose.

BACKGROUND: Proton linear energy transfer (LET) is associated with the relative biological effectiveness of radiation on tissues. Monte Carlo (MC) simulations have been known to be the preferred method to calculate LET. Detectors have also been built to measure LET, but they need to be calibrated with MC simulations. PURPOSE: To propose and test a MC-free method for determining LET from the measured integral depth dose (LFI) of the protons of interest. METHOD AND MATERIALS: LFI consists of three steps: (1) IDD measurements, (2) extraction of energy spectrum (ES) from the IDD, and (3) LET determination from the extracted ES and the stopping power of each energy. To validate the accuracy of the extraction of ES, we use Gaussian ES to synthesize IDD, extract ES from the synthesized IDD, and then compare the original (ground truth) and extracted ES. LETs calculated from the original and extracted ES are also compared. To obtain the LET of protons of interest, we measure IDDs by a large-area plane-parallel ionization chamber in water. Finally, TOPAS MC is employed to simulate IDDs, ES, and LETs. From the simulated IDD, the extracted ES and LET are compared with the simulations from TOPAS MC. RESULTS: From the synthesized IDDs, the LETs agreed excellently when the peak energies ≥10 and 1.25 MeV with depth resolutions 0.1 and 0.01 mm, respectively. For energy <1.25 MeV, even higher depth resolution than 0.01 mm is required. From the MC simulated IDDs, our track-averaged LET excellently agreed with MC simulation, but not the LETd . Our LETd was smaller than MC simulated LETd in the shallow region but larger in the distal Bragg peak region. CONCLUSION: LET can be accurately determined from the IDD. This method can be used in the clinic to commission or validate LETs from other measurement methods or a treatment planning system.

Proton beam stereotactic body radiotherapy and hypofractionated therapy with pencil beam scanning is safe and effective for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: A single center experience.

Background: Proton beam therapy (PBT) is a non-surgical treatment that spares adjacent tissues compared to photon radiation and useful for Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA). We present a single center experience in HCC and iCCA treated with Pencil Beam Scanning (PBS) PBT. Methods: Forty-four consecutive patients (22 patients in each group) receiving PBT were included and reviewed. PBT was delivered with hypofractionated or stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) using PBS. Tumor size was approximated by clinical target volume (CTV). Outcomes were evaluated with Kaplan-Meier and liver toxicity was determined by MELD-Na and albumin-bilirubin (ALBI) grade. Results: Median follow up was 38.7 months, fourteen (35%) had multifocal disease and median CTV was 232.5cc. Four (9%) and 40 (91%) patients received SBRT and hypofractionated radiation, respectively. Two year overall survival was statistically higher for HCC (entire group: 68.9% months [95% CI: 61.3 - 76.3%]; iCCA: 49.8% [95% CI: 38.5% - 61.1%]; HCC: 89.4% [95% CI: 82.3 - 96.5%]; P <0.005). There was no statistical difference in progression-free survival or freedom from local failure. Biologically Equivalent Dose (BED) was greater than or equal to 80.5Gy in 37 (84%) patients. All iCCA patients had stable or improved ALBI grade following treatment. ALBI grade was stable in 83% of HCC patients and average MELD-Na score remained stable. Tumor size, pretreatment liver function, and total radiation dose were not associated with liver toxicity. Conclusions: PBT for unresectable HCC and iCCA is safe and effective, even for large and multifocal tumors. Liver function was preserved even in those with baseline cirrhosis in this advanced population with large tumors.

Technical note: Characterization and practical applications of a novel plastic scintillator for online dosimetry for an ultrahigh dose rate (FLASH).

PURPOSE: Although flash radiation therapy (FLASH-RT) is a promising novel technique that has the potential to achieve a better therapeutic ratio between tumor control and normal tissue complications, the ultrahigh pulsed dose rates (UHPDR) mean that experimental dosimetry is very challenging. There is a need for real-time dosimeters in the development and implementation of FLASH-RT. In this work, we characterize a novel plastic scintillator capable of temporal resolution short enough (2.5 ms) to resolve individual pulses. METHODS: We characterized a novel plastic dosimeter for use in a linac converter to deliver 16-MeV electrons at 100-Gy/s UHPDR average dose rates. The linearity and reproducibility were established by comparing relative measurements with a pinpoint ionization chamber placed at 10-cm water-equivalent depth where the electrometer is not saturated by the high dose per pulse. The accuracy was established by comparing the plastic scintillator dose measurements with EBT-XD Gafchromic radiochromic films, the current reference dosimeter for UHPDR. Finally, the plastic scintillator was compared against EBT-XD films for online dosimetry of two in vitro experiments performed at UHPDR. RESULTS: Relative ion chamber measurements were linear with plastic scintillator response within ≤1% over 4-20 Gy and pulse frequencies (18-180 Hz). When characterized under reference conditions with NIST-traceability, the plastic scintillator maintained its dose response under UHPDR conditions and agreed with EBT-XD film dose measurements within 4% under reference conditions and 6% for experimental online dosimetry. CONCLUSION: The plastic scintillator shows a linear and reproducible response and is able to accurately measure the radiation absorbed dose delivered by 16-MeV electrons at UHPDR. The dose is measured accurately in real time with a greater level of precision than that achieved with a radiochromic film.

Proton Arc Therapy vs Interstitial HDR Brachytherapy in Gynecologic Cancer with Parametrial/pelvic Side Wall Extension.

Purpose: To investigate whether volumetric-modulated proton arc therapy (VPAT) plans generate comparable doses to organs at risk (OARs) compared with interstitial high-dose-rate (iHDR) brachytherapy for patients with gynecologic cancer with disease extension to parametrial/pelvic side wall, who are not eligible for the aggressive procedure. Materials and Methods: VPAT delivers proton arc beams by modulated energies at the beam nozzle while maintaining the same incident energy to the gantry during the arc rotation. Plans of 10 patients previously treated with iHDR brachytherapy for high-risk clinical treatment volumes (HRCTV; 31.8-110.6 cm3; lateral dimensions, 4.2-5.6 cm) were selected and compared with VPAT plans. VPAT plans for each patient were designed using a 152- to 245-MeV range of energy-modulated proton beams. Results: HRCTV coverage of the VPAT plans was comparable to that of the iHDR plans, with V150% showing no statistical differences. On average, the V100% and V90% of VPAT plans were higher than those of the iHDR plans, 95.0% vs 91.9% (P = .02) and 98.6% vs 97.5% (P = .02), respectively. D100 was also 17% higher for the VPAT plans (P = .03). On average, the D2cm3 of bladder, rectum, and small bowels in the VPAT plans were considerably lower than those in iHDR plans (by 17.4%, 35.2%, and 65.6%, respectively; P < .05 for all OARs). Conclusion: VPAT-generated plans were dosimetrically superior to those with HDR brachytherapy with interstitial needles for locally advanced gynecologic cancer with parametrial/pelvic side wall disease extension. Dosimetrically, VPAT provides a noninvasive alternative to iHDR brachytherapy with a superior dosimetric profile.

Combining Serial and Parallel Functionality in Functional Lung Avoidance Radiation Therapy.

PURPOSE: Functional lung avoidance (FLA) radiation therapy (RT) aims to minimize post-RT pulmonary toxicity by preferentially avoiding dose to high-functioning lung (HFL) regions. A common limitation is that FLA approaches do not consider the conducting architecture for gas exchange. We previously proposed the functionally weighted airway sparing (FWAS) method to spare airways connected to HFL regions, showing that it is possible to substantially reduce risk of radiation-induced airway injury. Here, we compare the performance of FLA and FWAS and propose a novel method combining both approaches. METHODS: We used breath-hold computed tomography (BHCT) and simulation 4-dimensional computed tomography (4DCT) from 12 lung stereotactic ablative radiation therapy patients. Four planning strategies were examined: (1) Conventional: no sparing other than clinical dose-volume constraints; (2) FLA: using a 4DCT-based ventilation map to delineate the HFL, plans were optimized to reduce mean dose and V13.50 in HFL; (3) FWAS: we autosegemented 11 to 13 generations of individual airways from each patient's BHCT and assigned priorities based on the relative contribution of each airway to total ventilation. We used these priorities in the optimization along with airway dose constraints, estimated as a function of airway diameter and 5% probability of collapse; and (4) FLA + FWAS: we combined information from the 2 strategies. We prioritized clinical dose constraints for organs at risk and planning target volume in all plans. We performed the evaluation in terms of ventilation preservation accounting for radiation-induced damage to both lung parenchyma and airways. RESULTS: We observed average ventilation preservation for FLA, FWAS, and FLA + FWAS as 3%, 8.5%, and 14.5% higher, respectively, than for Conventional plans for patients with ventilation preservation in Conventional plans <90%. Generalized estimated equations showed that all improvements were statistically significant (P ≤ .036). We observed no clinically relevant improvements in outcomes of the sparing techniques in patients with ventilation preservation in Conventional plans ≥90%. CONCLUSIONS: These initial results suggest that it is crucial to consider the parallel and the serial nature of the lung to improve post-radiation therapy lung function and, consequently, quality of life for patients.

The thermodynamics of diastole: kinematic modeling-based derivation of the P-V loop to transmitral flow energy relation with in vivo validation.

Pressure-volume (P-V) loop-based analysis facilitates thermodynamic assessment of left ventricular function in terms of work and energy. Typically these quantities are calculated for a cardiac cycle using the entire P-V loop, although thermodynamic analysis may be applied to a selected phase of the cardiac cycle, specifically, diastole. Diastolic function is routinely quantified by analysis of transmitral Doppler E-wave contours. The first law of thermodynamics requires that energy (ε) computed from the Doppler E-wave (εE-wave) and the same portion of the P-V loop (εP-V E-wave) be equivalent. These energies have not been previously derived nor have their predicted equivalence been experimentally validated. To test the hypothesis that εP-V E-wave and εE-wave are equivalent, we used a validated kinematic model of filling to derive εE-wave in terms of chamber stiffness, relaxation/viscoelasticity, and load. For validation, simultaneous (conductance catheter) P-V and echocadiographic data from 12 subjects (205 total cardiac cycles) having a range of diastolic function were analyzed. For each E-wave, εE-wave was compared with εP-V E-wave calculated from simultaneous P-V data. Linear regression yielded the following: εP-V E-wave=αεE-wave+b (R2=0.67), where α=0.95 and b=6e(-5). We conclude that E-wave-derived energy for suction-initiated early rapid filling εE-wave, quantitated via kinematic modeling, is equivalent to invasive P-V-defined filling energy. Hence, the thermodynamics of diastole via εE-wave generate a novel mechanism-based index of diastolic function suitable for in vivo phenotypic characterization.

Radiation shielding and safety implications following linac conversion to an electron FLASH-RT unit.

PURPOSE: Due to their finite range, electrons are typically ignored when calculating shielding requirements in megavoltage energy linear accelerator vaults. However, the assumption that 16 MeV electrons need not be considered does not hold when operated at FLASH-RT dose rates (~200× clinical dose rate), where dose rate from bremsstrahlung photons is an order of magnitude higher than that from an 18 MV beam for which shielding was designed. We investigate the shielding and radiation protection impact of converting a Varian 21EX linac to FLASH-RT dose rates. METHODS: We performed a radiation survey in all occupied areas using a Fluke Biomedical Inovision 451P survey meter and a Wide Energy Neutron Detection Instrument (Wendi)-2 FHT 762 neutron detector. The dose rate from activated linac components following a 1.8-min FLASH-RT delivery was also measured. RESULTS: When operated at a gantry angle of 180° such as during biology experiments, the 16 MeV FLASH-RT electrons deliver ~10 µSv/h in the controlled areas and 780 µSv/h in the uncontrolled areas, which is above the 20 µSv in any 1-h USNRC limit. However, to exceed 20 µSv, the unit must be operated continuously for 92 s, which corresponds in this bunker and FLASH-RT beam to a 3180 Gy workload at isocenter, which would be unfeasible to deliver within that timeframe due to experimental logistics. While beam steering and dosimetry activities can require workloads of that magnitude, during these activities, the gantry is positioned at 0° and the dose rate in the uncontrolled area becomes undetectable. Likewise, neutron activation of linac components can reach 25 µSv/h near the isocenter following FLASH-RT delivery, but dissipates within minutes, and total doses within an hour are below 20 µSv. CONCLUSION: Bremsstrahlung photons created by a 16 MeV FLASH-RT electron beam resulted in consequential dose rates in controlled and uncontrolled areas, and from activated linac components in the vault. While our linac vault shielding proved sufficient, other investigators would be prudent to confirm the adequacy of their radiation safety program, particularly if operating in vaults designed for 6 MV.

Outcomes of and treatment planning considerations for a hybrid technique delivering proton pencil-beam scanning radiation to women with metal-containing tissue expanders undergoing post-mastectomy radiation.

BACKGROUND: Following mastectomy, immediate breast reconstruction often involves the use of temporary tissue expanders (TEs). TEs contain metallic ports (MPs), which complicate proton pencil-beam scanning (PBS) planning. A technique was implemented for delivering PBS post-mastectomy radiation (PMRT) to patients with TEs and MPs. METHODS: A protocol utilizing a hybrid single- and multi-field optimization (SFO, MFO) technique was developed. Plans were robustly optimized using a Monte Carlo algorithm. A CTV_eval structure including chest wall (CW) and regional nodal (RNI) targets and excluding the TE was evaluated. Organ at risk (OAR) dosimetry and acute toxicities were analyzed. RESULTS: Twenty-nine women were treated with this technique. A 2-field SFO technique was used superior and inferior to the MP, with a 3 or 4-field MFO technique used at the level of the MP. Virtual blocks were utilized so that beams did not travel through the MP. A port-to-CW distance of 1 cm was required. Patients underwent daily image-guidance to ensure the port remained within a 0.5 cm internal planning volume (ITV). Median RT dose to CTV_eval was 50.4 Gy (45.0-50.4). Median 95% CTV_eval coverage was 99.5% (95-100). Optically stimulated luminescent dosimeter (OSLD) readings were available for 8 patients and correlated to the dose measurements in the treatment planning system (TPS); median OSLD ratio was 0.99 (range, 0.93-1.02). CONCLUSIONS: Delivering PMRT with PBS for women with metal-containing TEs using a hybrid SFO/MFO technique is feasible, reproducible, and achieves excellent dose distributions. Specialized planning and image-guidance techniques are required to safely utilize this treatment in the clinic.