Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 14 de 14
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Epidemiol Infect ; 148: e83, 2020 04 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32238211

RESUMEN

Participation in European surveillance for bloodstream infection (BSI) commenced in Ireland in 1999 with all laboratories (n = 39) participating by 2014. Observational hand hygiene auditing (OHHA) was implemented in 2011. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of OHHA on hand hygiene compliance, alcohol hand rub (AHR) procurement and the incidence of sensitive and resistant Staphylococcus aureus and Enterococcus faecium and faecalis BSI. A prospective segmented regression analysis was performed to determine the temporal association between OHHA and outcomes. Observed hand hygiene improved from 74.7% (73.7-75.6) in 2011 to 90.8% (90.1-91.3) in 2016. AHR procurement increased from 20.1 l/1000 bed days used (BDU) in 2009 to 33.2 l/1000 BDU in 2016. A pre-intervention reduction of 2% per quarter in the ratio of methicillin sensitive Staphylococcus aureus BSI/BDU stabilized in the time period after the intervention (P < 0.01). The ratio of Methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) BSI/BDU was decreasing by 5% per quarter pre-intervention, this slowed to 2% per quarter post intervention, (P < 0.01). There was no significant change in the ratio of vancomycin sensitive (P = 0.49) or vancomycin resistant (P = 0.90) Enterococcus sp. BSI/BDU post intervention. This study shows national OHHA increased observed hand hygiene compliance and AHR procurement, however there was no associated reduction in BSI.


Asunto(s)
Bacteriemia/prevención & control , Higiene de las Manos , Bacteriemia/epidemiología , Humanos , Incidencia , Irlanda/epidemiología , Estudios Prospectivos , Análisis de Regresión
2.
J Hosp Infect ; 42(3): 177-83, 1999 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10439989

RESUMEN

Despite improvements in survival rates, infection remains an important cause of morbidity and mortality following solid organ transplantation. Prevention of infection and, failing this, prompt diagnosis and treatment remain the cornerstones of management. During the peri-operative admission, when the level of immunosuppression is at its height, nosocomial infection accounts for the majority of infective morbidity. Although the measures taken to prevent nosocomial infection may vary, centres undertaking such procedures must ensure that strategies are in place to protect patients. The importance of basic infection control measures cannot be over-emphasised. In addition, appropriate prophylactic agents, rapid diagnostic techniques and the early institution of appropriate therapy are essential. As developments in this field advance, the epidemiology of infection will continue to change, demanding an ongoing assessment of preventative, diagnostic and therapeutic strategies.


Asunto(s)
Infección Hospitalaria/prevención & control , Trasplante de Órganos , Infección Hospitalaria/diagnóstico , Infección Hospitalaria/transmisión , Farmacorresistencia Microbiana , Humanos , Control de Infecciones/métodos , Trasplante de Órganos/métodos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/diagnóstico , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/prevención & control
3.
J Hosp Infect ; 31(1): 55-60, 1995 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-7499821

RESUMEN

Aeromonas species were isolated from specimens other than faeces from 59 hospital inpatients over a 15 year period. Of the isolates, 79.7% were regarded as clinically significant, with skin and soft tissues and blood cultures as the commonest sites of infection. Of the isolates, 52.5% were hospital-acquired, and 55.9% of patients had serious underlying disease. Community-acquired infections in previously healthy individuals accounted for only 13.6% of isolates. However unlike many other opportunistic infections, aeromonas infection was not closely associated with prior antibiotic therapy, nor was there a significant increase in the frequency of infection over the study period.


Asunto(s)
Aeromonas/clasificación , Bacteriemia/microbiología , Infección Hospitalaria/microbiología , Infecciones por Bacterias Gramnegativas/microbiología , Enfermedades Cutáneas Infecciosas/microbiología , Infecciones de los Tejidos Blandos/microbiología , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Niño , Preescolar , Infecciones Comunitarias Adquiridas/microbiología , Inglaterra , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Lactante , Control de Infecciones , Masculino , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos
4.
J Hosp Infect ; 46(4): 271-9, 2000 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11170758

RESUMEN

The control of hospital-acquired infection, in particular methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) remains a challenge. Our hospital has established a purpose built 11-bed cohort unit with on-site rehabilitation for care of patients colonized with MRSA, in an attempt to improve their quality of care. Prior to the opening of this unit a number of concerns were voiced and the aim of this study was to address these. First, to establish if patient cohorting reduces the likelihood of successful decolonization, second, to evaluate the risk of staff colonization, and finally to see if successful environmental control of MRSA is possible.A patient database was established detailing patient demographics, infection rates, eradication and reacquisition rates. Staff screening was performed weekly, at the start of a period of duty. Sixty environmental sites were screened before unit opening, at 48h, six weeks and at six months. There were 88 admissions in the first six months; 62 patients were colonized with MRSA, and 26 patients (10 surgical, 16 medical) had MRSA infections. Twenty-three of 88 patients (26%) were successfully decolonized, which compares favourably with an eradication rate of 20% for the rest of the hospital. Twenty staff members participated in weekly screening. Five staff members colonized with MRSA were detected and all were successfully decolonized. Environmental control was achieved with a combination of a daily detergent clean and a once weekly clean with phenolic disinfectant. Our preliminary data suggest that, despite cohorting patients colonized with MRSA, with proper education and supervised cleaning protocols, it is possible to control environmental MRSA load, successfully decolonize patients and limit the risk of staff colonization.


Asunto(s)
Infección Hospitalaria/prevención & control , Infección Hospitalaria/rehabilitación , Unidades Hospitalarias/organización & administración , Control de Infecciones/métodos , Transmisión de Enfermedad Infecciosa de Paciente a Profesional/prevención & control , Resistencia a la Meticilina , Aislamiento de Pacientes/organización & administración , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/prevención & control , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/rehabilitación , Staphylococcus aureus , Portador Sano/microbiología , Portador Sano/prevención & control , Portador Sano/transmisión , Infección Hospitalaria/microbiología , Infección Hospitalaria/transmisión , Femenino , Hospitales Universitarios , Humanos , Capacitación en Servicio , Irlanda , Masculino , Tamizaje Masivo/métodos , Personal de Enfermería en Hospital/educación , Evaluación de Programas y Proyectos de Salud , Estudios Prospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Estaciones del Año , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/microbiología , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/transmisión
6.
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis ; 24(7): 480-3, 2005 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15977004

RESUMEN

Presented here is the 5-year impact of a national antimicrobial resistance surveillance system in Ireland, which was introduced in accordance with the European Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance System (EARSS). Participation in EARSS began in Ireland in 1999. Initially, 12 laboratories serving a mix of general and tertiary hospitals participated, but by 2003, participation had increased to 28 laboratories with a population coverage of 89%. During 1999-2003, 4,146 episodes of Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia were reported, and methicillin resistance was detected in 1,709 (41.2%) of these isolates. Over the same period, 1,245 invasive (blood or cerebrospinal fluid) episodes of Streptococcus pneumoniae infection were reported, and 160 (12.9%) isolates were found to be non-susceptible to penicillin, with 23 (1.8%) demonstrating high-level penicillin resistance. By 2003, most Irish hospitals were participating in EARSS, which has been a catalyst for the development of a national antimicrobial resistance surveillance programme.


Asunto(s)
Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana , Vigilancia de la Población/métodos , Staphylococcus aureus/efectos de los fármacos , Streptococcus pneumoniae/efectos de los fármacos , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana Múltiple , Humanos , Irlanda/epidemiología , Modelos Logísticos , Infecciones Neumocócicas/epidemiología , Infecciones Neumocócicas/microbiología , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/epidemiología , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/microbiología , Factores de Tiempo
7.
J Trauma ; 41(3): 546-8, 1996 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8810981

RESUMEN

Three patients were admitted with close-range gunshot wounds of the knee and lower leg, inflicted in all three cases through clothing. At admission, all of the patients were given antibiotics (cefuroxime and metronidazole) to prevent streptococcal and anaerobic infection. All of the patients developed severe tissue infection with Bacillus cereus within days of admission. In one case, the organism was also recovered from the blood. B. cereus is capable of causing severe infection after trauma and its ubiquity in the environment allows it easy access to gunshot wounds. Its potent production of beta-lactamase renders penicillins and cephalosporins predictably ineffective. The early administration of a non-beta-lactam drug (such as ciprofloxacin) should be considered in cases where Bacillus cereus is isolated from traumatic wounds.


Asunto(s)
Bacillus cereus , Infecciones por Bacterias Grampositivas , Infección de Heridas/microbiología , Heridas por Arma de Fuego/microbiología , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Infecciones por Bacterias Grampositivas/tratamiento farmacológico , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Infección de Heridas/tratamiento farmacológico
8.
J Antimicrob Chemother ; 45(1): 111-3, 2000 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10629021

RESUMEN

The provisional BSAC method for the detection of methicillin sensitivity in coagulase-negative staphylococci (CNS) requires incubation of isolates for 48 h and raises the problem of timely reporting of susceptibility data. The forthcoming withdrawal of methicillin raises another difficulty. We evaluated 42 clinically significant CNS blood culture isolates by PCR, methicillin and oxacillin disc testing and by using methicillin Etests. Our results suggest that, although oxacillin disc susceptibility testing is a reasonable first line step, optimal and timely detection of resistance or susceptibility may require a combination of phenotypic and genotypic methods.


Asunto(s)
Resistencia a la Meticilina/genética , Meticilina/farmacología , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana/métodos , Oxacilina/farmacología , Reacción en Cadena de la Polimerasa , Staphylococcus/efectos de los fármacos , Coagulasa/metabolismo , Genes Bacterianos , Humanos , Penicilinas/farmacología , Staphylococcus/enzimología , Staphylococcus/genética
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA