Assessing a Structured Mental Fitness Program for Academic Acute Care Surgeons: A Pilot Study.

INTRODUCTION: There is a well-established positive correlation between improved physician wellness and patient care outcomes. Mental fitness is a component of wellness that is understudied in academic medicine. We piloted a structured mental fitness Positive Intelligence (PQ) training program for academic surgeons, hypothesizing this would be associated with improvements in PQ scores, wellness, sleep, and trainee evaluations. METHODS: This is a single-institution, prospective, mixed-methods pilot study. All active Burn/Trauma/Acute & Critical Care Surgical faculty and fellows in our division were offered the PQ program and the option to participate in this research study. The 6-wk program consists of daily exercises on a smartphone application, weekly readings, and small-group meetings with a trained mindfulness coach. Study outcomes included changes in pretraining versus post-training PQ scores, sleep hygiene, wellness, and teaching scores. A Net Promoter Score was calculated to measure user overall experience (range -100 to 100; positive scores being supportive). For secondary analysis, participants were stratified into high versus low user groups by "muscle" scores, which were calculated by program use over time. A postintervention focus group was also held to evaluate perceptions of wellness and experience with the PQ program. RESULTS: Data were analyzed for 15 participants who provided consent. The participants were primarily White (73.3%), Assistant Professors (66.7%) with Surgical Critical Care fellowship training (86.7%), and a slight female predominance (53.3%). Comparison of scores pretraining versus post-training demonstrated statistically significant increases in PQ (59 versus 65, P = 0.004), but no significant differences for sleep (24.0 versus 29.0, P = 0.33) or well-being (89.0 versus 94.0, P = 0.10). Additionally, there was no significant difference in teaching evaluations for both residents (9.1 versus 9.3, P = 0.33) and medical students (8.3 versus 8.5, P = 0.77). High versus low user groups were defined by the median muscle score (166 [Interquartile range 95.5-298.5]). High users demonstrated a statistically higher proportion of ongoing usage (75% versus 14%, P < 0.05). The final Net Promoter Score score was 25, which demonstrates program support within this group. Focus group content analysis established eight major categories: current approaches to wellness, preknowledge, reasons for participation, expected gains, program strengths, suggestions for improvement, recommendations for approaches, and sustainability. CONCLUSIONS: Our pilot study highlighted certain benefits of a structured mental fitness program for academic acute care surgeons. Our mixed-methods data demonstrate significant improvement in PQ scores, ongoing usage in high user participants, as well as interpersonal benefits such as improved connectedness and creation of a shared language within participants. Future work should evaluate this program on a higher-powered scale, with a focus on intentionality in wellness efforts, increased exposure to mental fitness, and recruitment of trainees and other health-care providers, as well as identifying the potential implications for patient outcomes.

Developing a Robotic Surgery Curriculum: Selection of Virtual Reality Drills for Content Alignment.

INTRODUCTION: Despite the importance of simulation-based training for robotic surgery, there is no consensus about its training curricula. Recently, a virtual reality (VR) platform (SimNow, Intuitive, Inc) was introduced with 33 VR drills but without evidence of their validity. As part of our creating a new robotic VR curriculum, we assessed the drills' validity through content mapping and the alignment between learning goals and drill content. METHODS: Three robotically trained surgeons content-mapped all 33 drills for how well the drills incorporated 15 surgery skills and also rated the drills' difficulty, usefulness, relevance, and uniqueness. Drills were added to the new curriculum based on consensus about ratings and historic learner data. The drills were grouped according to similar skill sets and arranged in order of complexity. RESULTS: The 33 drills were judged to have 12/15 surgery skills as primary goals and 13/15 as secondary goals. Twenty of the 33 drills were selected for inclusion in the new curriculum; these had 11/15 skills as primary goals and 11/15 as secondary goals. However, skills regarding energy sources, atraumatic handling, blunt dissection, fine dissection, and running suturing were poorly represented in the drills. Three previously validated inanimate drills were added to the curriculum to address lacking skill domains. CONCLUSIONS: We identified 20 of the 33 SimNow drills as a foundation for a robotic surgery curriculum based on content-oriented evidence. We added 3 other drills to address identified gaps in drill content.

Assessing North Texas Regional Trauma Handoffs: A Multicenter Mixed-Methods Needs Assessment.

INTRODUCTION: Trauma video review of Emergency Medical Services (EMS) handoffs demonstrates frequent problems including interruptions and incomplete information transfer. This study aimed to perform a regional needs assessment of handoff perceptions and expectations to guide future standardization efforts. METHODS: A multidisciplinary team of trauma providers through consensus building created an anonymous survey which was then distributed through the North Central Texas Trauma Regional Advisory Council and four regional level-1 trauma institutions. Qualitative data underwent content analysis; quantitative data are presented with descriptive statistics. RESULTS: Survey responses (n = 249) were submitted by trauma nurses (38%), EMS (24%), emergency physicians (14%), and trauma physicians (13%). Median overall handoff quality was rated well (4, scale 1-5) despite some variability between hospitals (3, scale 1-5). The top five most important handoff details were the same for both stable and unstable patients: primary mechanism, blood pressure, heart rate, Glasgow Coma Scale, and location of injuries. While providers felt neutral about the data order, the vast majority supported immediate bed transfer and primary survey in unstable patients. The majority of receiving providers report interrupting handoff at least once (78%); and 66% of EMS clinicians found interruptions disruptive. Content analysis revealed top priority categories for improvement: environment, communication, information relayed, team dynamics, and flow of care. CONCLUSION: Although our data demonstrated satisfaction and concordance with respect to the EMS handoff, 84% of EMS clinicians reported some to high amounts of variability across institutions. Gaps in the development of standardized handoffs identified include exposure, education, and enforcement of these protocols.

Developing artificial intelligence models for medical student suturing and knot-tying video-based assessment and coaching.

BACKGROUND: Early introduction and distributed learning have been shown to improve student comfort with basic requisite suturing skills. The need for more frequent and directed feedback, however, remains an enduring concern for both remote and in-person training. A previous in-person curriculum for our second-year medical students transitioning to clerkships was adapted to an at-home video-based assessment model due to the social distancing implications of COVID-19. We aimed to develop an Artificial Intelligence (AI) model to perform video-based assessment. METHODS: Second-year medical students were asked to submit a video of a simple interrupted knot on a penrose drain with instrument tying technique after self-training to proficiency. Proficiency was defined as performing the task under two minutes with no critical errors. All the videos were first manually rated with a pass-fail rating and then subsequently underwent task segmentation. We developed and trained two AI models based on convolutional neural networks to identify errors (instrument holding and knot-tying) and provide automated ratings. RESULTS: A total of 229 medical student videos were reviewed (150 pass, 79 fail). Of those who failed, the critical error distribution was 15 knot-tying, 47 instrument-holding, and 17 multiple. A total of 216 videos were used to train the models after excluding the low-quality videos. A k-fold cross-validation (k = 10) was used. The accuracy of the instrument holding model was 89% with an F-1 score of 74%. For the knot-tying model, the accuracy was 91% with an F-1 score of 54%. CONCLUSIONS: Medical students require assessment and directed feedback to better acquire surgical skill, but this is often time-consuming and inadequately done. AI techniques can instead be employed to perform automated surgical video analysis. Future work will optimize the current model to identify discrete errors in order to supplement video-based rating with specific feedback.

The case for a new post-graduate hernia designation: a review of fellowship council case logs from the past twelve-years.

BACKGROUND: The Fellowship Council (FC) is a robust accreditation body with numerous fellowships; however, no specific criteria exist for hernia fellowships. This study analyzed the case log database to evaluate trends in fellowship exposure to hernia repairs. METHODS: FC hernia case log records (2007-2019) were coded as inguinal or ventral hernias and with or without mesh repair. Retrospective analysis examined total hernia repairs logged, type of repair, program designation, and robotic adoption. Robotic adoption was categorized by quartiles of program performance according to the final year of analysis (2018-2019); yearly performance was then graphed by quartiles. RESULTS: Over this twelve-year period, 93,334 hernia repairs, 5 program designations, 152 unique programs and 1,558 unique fellows were analyzed. The number of fellows grew from 106 (2007-2008) to > 130 (2018-2019). Total hernias repairs per fellow increased from an average of 41.2 in 2007-2008 to 75.7 in 2018-2019 (183.7%). Open and robotic hernia repairs increased by 241.9% and 266.3%, respectively; laparoscopic hernia repairs decreased by 14.8%. Inguinal and ventral hernia repairs comprised 48.1% and 51.9% of total cases, respectively. Advanced GI/MIS and Advanced GI/MIS/Bariatrics programs logged the majority of hernia repairs (86.0-90.2%). 2014 began an exponential rise in robotic adoption, with fellows averaging < 1 robotic repairs before and > 25 repairs in 2019. A significant difference was found between all groups when comparing quartiles of robotic adopters (median robotic repairs per fellow; IQR): first quartile (72.0; 47.9-108.8), second quartile (25.5; 21.0-30.6), third quartile (13.0; 12.0-14.3) and fourth quartile (3.5; 0.5-5.0) (p-value < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: This twelve-year analysis shows a near doubling in the growth of total hernia repairs, with a decrease in laparoscopic repairs as robotic repairs increased. These data show the importance of hernia repairs in FC fellows' training and warrant further granular analysis to determine specific accreditation criteria for hernia fellowship designations.

SAGES safe cholecystectomy modules improve practicing surgeons' judgment: results of a randomized, controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Despite the advantages of laparoscopic cholecystectomy, major bile duct injury (BDI) rates during this operation remain unacceptably high. In October 2018, SAGES released the Safe Cholecystectomy modules, which define specific strategies to minimize the risk of BDI. This study aims to investigate whether this curriculum can change the knowledge and behaviors of surgeons in practice. METHODS: Practicing surgeons were recruited from the membership of SAGES and the American College of Surgeons Advisory Council for Rural Surgery. All participants completed a baseline assessment (pre-test) that involved interpreting cholangiograms, troubleshooting difficult cases, and managing BDI. Participants' dissection strategies during cholecystectomy were also compared to the strategies of a panel of 15 experts based on accuracy scores using the Think Like a Surgeon validated web-based platform. Participants were then randomized to complete the Safe Cholecystectomy modules (Safe Chole module group) or participate in usually scheduled CME activities (control group). Both groups completed repeat assessments (post-tests) one month after randomization. RESULTS: Overall, 41 participants were eligible for analysis, including 18 Safe Chole module participants and 23 controls. The two groups had no significant differences in pre-test scores. However, at post-test, Safe Chole module participants made significantly fewer errors managing BDI and interpreting cholangiograms. Safe Chole module participants were less likely to convert to an open operation on the post-test than controls when facing challenging dissections. However, Safe Chole module participants displayed a similar incidence of errors when evaluating adequate critical views of safety. CONCLUSIONS: In this randomized-controlled trial, the SAGES Safe Cholecystectomy modules improved surgeons' abilities to interpret cholangiograms and safely manage BDI. Additionally, surgeons who studied the modules were less likely to convert to open during difficult dissections. These data show the power of the Safe Cholecystectomy modules to affect practicing surgeons' behaviors in a measurable and meaningful way.

Using Trauma Video Review to Assess EMS Handoff and Trauma Team Non-Technical Skills.

OBJECTIVE: Handoffs by emergency medical services (EMS) personnel suffer from poor structure, inattention, and interruptions. The relationship between the quality of EMS communication and the non-technical performance of trauma teams remains unknown. METHODS: We analyzed 3 months of trauma resuscitation videos (highest acuity activations or patients with an Injury Severity Score [ISS] of ≥15). Handoffs were scored using the mechanism-injury-signs-treatment (MIST) framework for completeness (0-20), efficiency (category jumps), interruptions, and timeliness. Trauma team non-technical performance was scored using the Trauma Non-Technical Skills (T-NOTECHS) scale (5-15). RESULTS: We analyzed 99 videos. Handoffs lasted a median of 62 seconds [IQR: 43-74], scored 11 [10-13] for completeness, and had 2 [1-3] interruptions. Most interruptions were verbal (85.2%) and caused by the trauma team (64.9%). Most handoffs (92%) were efficient with 2 or fewer jumps. Patient transfer during handoff occurred in 53.5% of the videos; EMS providers giving handoff helped transfer in 69.8% of the Primary surveys began during handoff in 42.4% of the videos. Resuscitation teams who scored in the top-quartile on the T-NOTECHS (>11) had higher MIST scores than teams in lower quartiles (13 [11.25-14.75] vs. 11 [10-13]; p < .01). There were no significant differences in ISS, efficiency, timeliness, or interruptions between top- and lower-quartile groups. CONCLUSIONS: There is a relationship between EMS MIST completeness and high performance of non-technical skill by trauma teams. Trauma video review (TVR) can help identify modifiable behaviors to improve EMS handoff and resuscitation efforts and therefore trauma team performance.

Under the Lens: Team Perception of Trauma Video Review.

BACKGROUND: Video-based assessment and review are becoming increasingly common, and trauma video review (TVR) has been shown to be an effective educational, quality improvement, and research tool. Yet, trauma team perception of TVR remains incompletely understood. OBJECTIVE: We evaluated positive and negative perceptions of TVR across multiple team member groups. We hypothesized that members of the trauma team would find TVR educational and that anxiety would be low across all groups. METHODS: An anonymous electronic survey was provided to nurses, trainees, and faculty during weekly multidisciplinary trauma performance improvement conference following each TVR activity. Surveys assessed perception of performance improvement and anxiety or apprehension (Likert scale: 1 "strongly disagree" to 5 "strongly agree"). We report individual and normalized cumulative scores (average of responses for each positive [n = 6] and negative [n = 4] question stem). RESULTS: We analyzed 146 surveys over 8 months, with 100% completion rate. Respondents were trainees (58%), faculty (29%), and nurses (13%). Of the trainees, 73% were postgraduate year (PGY) 1-3 and 27% were PGY 4-9. Of all respondents, 84% had participated previously in a TVR conference. Respondents reported an improved perception of resuscitation education quality and personal leadership skills development. Participants found TVR to be more educational than punitive overall. Analysis of team member types showed lower scores for faculty for all positive stemmed questions. Trainees were more likely to agree with negative stemmed questions if they were a lower PGY, and nurses were least likely to agree with negative stemmed questions. CONCLUSIONS: TVR improves trauma resuscitation education in a conference setting, with trainees and nurses reporting the greatest benefit. Nurses were noted to be the least apprehensive about TVR.

Assessing Videoconference Etiquette in Academia: Determining Positive and Negative Associations With Online Interactions.

INTRODUCTION: The lack of guidelines for videoconferencing etiquette elucidated frustrations during the COVID-19 pandemic. The authors aimed to assess the perceptions of faculty educators and residents regarding videoconferencing etiquette. METHODS: In 2021, a survey assessing perceptions regarding the formality of various meeting types and the importance of various videoconferencing etiquette practices (Likert scale of 1-5) was created and disseminated to all faculty educators and residents at a single institution. Responses of faculty versus residents were analyzed in general and by procedural and mixed/nonprocedural subspecialties. RESULTS: The faculty response rate was 53.5% (38/71). The resident response rate was 7.3% (115/1569). A total of 19 departments were represented. Faculty respondents reported having significantly more hours of weekly formal meetings than residents, 4 (3-10) versus 2 (1-4) h (P < 0.05), and no difference in informal meeting hours, with 3 (2-6) versus 3 (1.6-5) h (P = 0.210). Faculty and residents concurred on the formality of all meeting types except for didactics, which residents regarded more frequently as informal (80.9% versus 57.9%; P < 0.01). Faculty rated wearing professional attire and keeping one's video on as mattering more, and that videoconferencing from bed was more inappropriate (P < 0.05). Furthermore, faculty and residents in mixed/nonprocedural specialties had more significantly discordant perceptions between them than did those in procedural specialties. CONCLUSIONS: The data demonstrated that faculty educators and residents have differing perceptions regarding the formality of meeting types and etiquette practices. These should be addressed to prevent future frustrations and improve engagement in ongoing virtual conferencing education.

Laparoscopic Ambidexterity in Left-Handed Trainees.

INTRODUCTION: There is a paucity of objective data about the advantages or disadvantages of handedness in surgery. Given the need for ambidexterity in laparoscopic surgery, our study aimed to identify the patterns in handedness and performance on basic laparoscopic tasks. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of intern laparoscopic performance on bimanual tasks was assessed for delta time (differences in task time between the dominant and nondominant hand) between left-hand and right-hand dominant interns. RESULTS: Data were analyzed for 16 residents. 25% were left-handed dominant (4/16) and 75% were right-handed dominant (12/16). Of the left-handed surgeons, 75% (3/4) operated primarily with their right hand. There was a significant difference between the time to task completion in Task 2 of left-handed and right-handed residents with median (IQR) time 94 s (90.25-97) and 127 s (104.25-128.5), respectively (P value = 0.02). No significant difference was seen between left-handed and right-handed residents on Task 1 (50 s versus 49 s) and Task 3 (51 s versus 59.5 s). In all three tasks, however, left-handed dominant residents had smaller variability (IQR 4.5-8 s versus 7-24.25 s) and significantly shorter delta times. CONCLUSIONS: Although true ambidexterity is rare, the ability to be facile with both hands is crucial for laparoscopic surgery. Our data show that variability in performance between the dominant hand and nondominant hand was remarkably smaller for left-hand dominant residents. This remains true despite the majority learning to operate with their nondominant hand. These data demonstrate a possible advantage to being left-hand dominant and may lead to further insights into variations of skill acquisition and improved curriculum development.

Overcoming Health Literacy Barriers by Developing Standardized Surgical Discharge Instructions.

INTRODUCTION: Approximately one-third of surgical patients exhibit low health literacy, and 39% of our patients are primary Spanish speakers. We first evaluated the current content of our arteriovenous fistula/graft discharge instruction (DCI) templates. Using the Plan-Do-Study-Act cycle quality improvement methodology, we then aimed to optimize the readability and formally translate new DCI and evaluate usage and inappropriate bouncebacks following implementation. METHODS: Current arteriovenous fistula/graft template content was reviewed by the literacy department for readability and vascular faculty for completeness and accuracy. The literacy department edits were categorized by word choice, added/removed content, format change, and grammatical errors. Two vascular surgeons rated completeness and accuracy on a Likert scale (1-5). Retrospective chart review was performed for telephone calls and emergency department bouncebacks for 3 mo flanking new DCI implementation. RESULTS: Of the 10 templates, all were in English and word count ranged from 192 to 990 words. Despite each template including all necessary subcategories, the median number of edits per 100 words was 9.2 [7.0-9.5]. Approximately half of the edits (5.4 [5.1-5.5]) were word choice edits. Overall, experts rated completeness at 3.9 [3.2-4.2] and accuracy at 4.0 [3.7-4.1]. Highest template utilization occurred during post-implementation months 1 (90%) and 3 (100%) with orientation sessions. There was a significant increase in concordant Spanish DCI use (P < 0.01) and no inappropriate bouncebacks after implementation. CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrated notable variability in the content and readability of our vascular access instruction templates. New DCI had strong usage and language concordance; continued use may decrease bouncebacks.

Survey of the 2020 Fellowship Council application and match process and the impact of COVID-19.

BACKGROUND: The interview process represents a necessary but potentially resource intensive process from applicant and program perspectives. This study aimed to identify opinions of the 2020 Fellowship Council (FC) application and match process and in-cycle transition to virtual interviews due to the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: Surveys were developed to assess the interview process and were distributed by the FC to all applicants and fellowship programs. Completion was voluntary and data (median [IQR] reported) were anonymous. RESULTS: Applicant response was 53%. Applicants submitted 27.5 (13.25-40) applications, were offered 10 (4-17) interviews, and ranked 10 (5-15) programs. Due to COVID-19, 74% of interview plans changed. Applicants completed 30% of their planned in-person interviews. For decision-making, 90% felt that in-person and 81% virtual interviews were sufficiently informative. Expected cost was $4750 ($2000-$6000) vs. actual cost $1000 ($250-$2250), (p < 0.05). Expected missed work-days were 10 (5-16) versus actual 3 (0-6.25) (p < 0.05). For future interviews, 44% of applicants preferred in-person after virtual pre-interviews, 29% preferred virtual only, and 18% preferred in-person only. Program response was 38%. Programs received 60 (43-85.5) applications, offered 20 (15-26) interviews, completed 16 (12.5-21) interviews, and ranked 14 (10-18) candidates. For decision-making, 92% of programs felt in-person versus 71% virtual interviews were sufficiently informative. Person-hours were greater for in-person 48 (27.5-80) versus virtual 24 (9-40) interviews (p < 0.05). For future interviews, 38% of programs preferred in-person after virtual pre-interviews, 31% preferred in-person only, and 21% preferred virtual only. CONCLUSION: Despite pandemic changes, 81% of applicants and 71% of programs felt they gained sufficient information from virtual sessions to create rank lists. Virtual interviews had lower costs and fewer missed work-days for applicants and decreased resource usage for programs. The majority of both groups preferred either solely virtual or virtual pre-interview followed by in-person interview formats. Virtual interviews should be incorporated into future fellowship application cycles.

Thriving or surviving? A critical examination of funding models for fellowship council fellowships.

BACKGROUND: Since 1997, the Fellowship Council (FC) has evolved into a robust organization responsible for the advanced training of nearly half of the US residency graduates entering general surgery practice. While FC fellowships are competitive (55% match rate) and offer outstanding educational experiences, funding is arguably vulnerable. This study aimed to investigate the current funding models of FC fellowships. METHODS: Under an IRB-approved protocol, an electronic survey was administered to 167 FC programs with subsequent phone interviews to collect data on total cost and funding sources. De-identified data were also obtained via 2020-2021 Foundation for Surgical Fellowships (FSF) grant applications. Means and ranges are reported. RESULTS: Data were obtained from 59 programs (35% response rate) via the FC survey and 116 programs via FSF applications; the average cost to train one fellow per year was $107,957 and $110,816, respectively. Most programs utilized departmental and grants funds. Additionally, 36% (FC data) to 39% (FSF data) of programs indicated billing for their fellow, generating on average $74,824 ($15,000-200,000) and $33,281 ($11,500-66,259), respectively. FC data documented that 14% of programs generated net positive revenue, whereas FSF data documented that all programs were budget-neutral. CONCLUSION: Both data sets yielded similar overall results, supporting the accuracy of our findings. Expenses varied widely, which may, in part, be due to regional cost differences. Most programs relied on multiple funding sources. A minority were able to generate a positive revenue stream. Although fewer than half of programs billed for their fellow, this source accounted for substantial revenue. Institutional support and external grant funding have continued to be important sources for the majority of programs as well. Given the value of these fellowships and inherent vulnerabilities associated with graduate medical education funding, alternative grant funding models and standardization of annual financial reporting are encouraged.

Feasibility, effectiveness and transferability of a novel mastery-based virtual reality robotic training platform for general surgery residents.

BACKGROUND: The annual number of robotic surgical procedures is on the rise. Robotic surgery requires unique skills compared to other surgical approaches. Simulation allows basic robot skill acquisition and enhances patient safety. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility, effectiveness, and transferability of a mastery-based curriculum using a new virtual reality (VR) robotic simulator for surgery resident training. METHODS: Nineteen PGY2s and 22 PGY4s were enrolled. Residents completed a pretest and posttest consisting of five VR and three previously validated inanimate tasks. Training included practicing 33 VR tasks until a total score ≥ 90% ("mastery") was achieved using automated metrics (time, economy of motion). Inanimate performance was evaluated by two trained, blinded raters using video review metrics (time, errors, and modified OSATS). Outcomes were defined as: curriculum feasibility (completion rate, training time, repetitions), training effectiveness (pre/post training skill improvement), and skill transferability (skill transfer to validated inanimate drills). Wilcoxon signed-rank and Mann-Whitney U tests were used; median (IQR) reported. RESULTS: Thirty-four of 41 residents (83%) achieved mastery on all 33 VR tasks; median training time was 7 h (IQR: 5'26″-8'52″). Pretest vs. post-test performance improved (all p < 0.001) according to all VR and Inanimate metrics for both PGY2 and PGY4 residents. Significant pretest performance differences were observed between PGY2 and PGY4 residents for VR but not inanimate tasks; no PGY2 vs. PGY4 posttest performance differences were observed for both VR and inanimate tasks. CONCLUSION: This mastery-based VR curriculum was associated with a high completion rate and excellent feasibility. Significant performance improvements were noted for both the VR and inanimate tasks, supporting training effectiveness and skill transferability. Additional studies examining validity evidence may help further refine this curriculum.

The Impact of COVID-19 on Surgical Education.

BACKGROUND: At the onset of social distancing, our general surgery residency transitioned its educational curriculum to an entirely virtual format with no gaps in conference offerings. The aim of this study is to examine the feasibility of our evolution to a virtual format and report program attitudes toward the changes. METHODS: On March 15, 2020, due to the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) our institution restricted mass gatherings. We immediately transitioned all lectures to a virtual platform. The cancellation of elective surgeries in April 2020 then created the need for augmented resident education opportunities. We responded by creating additional lectures and implementing a daily conference itinerary. To evaluate the success of the changes and inform the development of future curriculum, we surveyed residents and faculty regarding the changes. Classes and faculty answers were compared for perception of value of the online format. RESULTS: Pre-COVID-19, residency-wide educational offerings were concentrated to one half-day per week. Once restrictions were in place, our educational opportunities were expanded to a daily schedule and averaged 16.5 hours/week during April. Overall, 41/63 residents and 25/94 faculty completed the survey. The majority of residents reported an increased ability (56%) or similar ability (34.1%) to attend virtual conferences while 9.9% indicated a decrease. Faculty responses indicated similar effects (64% increased, 32% similar, 4% decreased). PGY-1 residents rated the changes negatively compared to other trainees and faculty. PGY-2 residents reported neutral views and all other trainees and faculty believed the changes positively affected educational value. Comments from PGY1 and 2 residents revealed they could not focus on virtual conferences as it was not "protected time" in a classroom and that they felt responsible for patient care during virtual lectures. A majority of both residents (61%) and faculty (84%) reported they would prefer to continue virtual conferences in the future. CONCLUSIONS: The necessity for adapting our academic offerings during the COVID-19 era has afforded our program the opportunity to recognize the feasibility of virtual platforms and expand our educational offerings. The majority of participants report stable to improved attendance and educational value. Virtual lectures should still be considered protected time in order to maximize the experience for junior residents.

Antifungal Therapy in Fungal Necrotizing Soft Tissue Infections.

BACKGROUND: Necrotizing soft tissue infections (NSTIs) are life-threatening surgical emergencies associated with high morbidity and mortality. Fungal NSTIs are considered rare and have been largely understudied. The purpose of this study was to study the impact of fungal NSTIs and antifungal therapy on mortality after NSTIs. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed on patients with NSTIs from 2012 to 2018. Patient baseline characteristics, microbiologic data, antimicrobial therapy, and clinical outcomes were collected. Patients were excluded if they had comfort care before excision. The primary outcome measured was in-hospital mortality. RESULTS: A total of 215 patients met study criteria with a fungal species identified in 29 patients (13.5%). The most prevalent fungal organism was Candida tropicalis (n = 11). Fungal NSTIs were more prevalent in patients taking immunosuppressive medications (17.2% versus 3.2%, P = 0.01). A fungal NSTI was significantly associated with in-hospital mortality (odds ratio, 3.13; 95% confidence interval, 1.16-8.40; P = 0.02). Furthermore, fungal NSTI patients had longer lengths of stay (32 d [interquartile range, 16-53] versus 19 d [interquartile range, 11-31], P < 0.01), more likely to require initiation of renal replacement therapy (24.1% versus 8.6%, P = 0.02), and more likely to require mechanical ventilation (64.5% versus 42.0%, P = 0.02). Initiation of antifungals was associated with a significantly lower rate of in-hospital mortality (6.7% versus 57.1%, P = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Fungal NSTIs are more common in patients taking immunosuppressive medications and are significantly associated with in-hospital mortality. Antifungal therapy is associated with decreased in-hospital mortality in those with fungal NSTIs. Consideration should be given to adding antifungals in empiric treatment regimens, especially in those taking immunosuppressive medications.

Proficiency Levels and Validity Evidence for Scoring Metrics for a Virtual Reality and Inanimate Robotic Surgery Simulation Curriculum.

OBJECTIVE: Our institution recently implemented a virtual reality (VR) skills curriculum for general surgery residents using the SimNow simulator. Based on a content alignment study, we revised the curriculum to include only 20 of 33 VR tasks and we added 3 previously validated inanimate tasks. The purpose of this study was to establish expert-derived proficiency levels for all tasks and to evaluate the validity of the scoring for the VR tasks. DESIGN: Two expert robotic surgeons performed 5 repetitions of each VR and inanimate task. The trimmed mean (lowest scoring attempt and outliers [>2 standard deviations] were eliminated) was defined as the expert level for each task. For the VR tasks, expert levels were compared to resident performance to evaluate validity. SETTING: This study was conducted at the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (Dallas, TX), a tertiary care academic teaching hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Two expert robotic surgeons participated in this study. The data from 42 residents (PGY2-4) who completed the original curriculum was used to represent novice performance. RESULTS: Comparison of expert levels and resident performance was statistically significant for 15 VR tasks (supporting validity) and approached significance (p = 0.06, 0.09) for 2 VR tasks; expert levels were designated as proficiency levels for these 17 tasks. Group comparisons were clearly not significant (p = 0.2-0.8) for 3 VR tasks; 2 of these 3 tasks were retained as introductory exercises (with 3 repetitions required) and 1 was excluded. For the 3 inanimate tasks, expert levels minus 2 standard deviations were designated as proficiency levels. CONCLUSIONS: This analysis generated validity evidence for 15 VR tasks and established expert-derived proficiency levels for 17 VR tasks and 3 inanimate tasks. Our proposed curriculum now consists of 19 VR and 3 inanimate tasks using the selected proficiency levels. We anticipate that this design will maximize curriculum efficiency and effectiveness.

Evaluating emergency department tube thoracostomy: A single-center use of trauma video review to assess efficiency and technique.

BACKGROUND: Emergency department tube thoracostomy is a common procedure; however, assessing procedural skills is difficult. We sought to describe procedural variability and technical complications of emergency department tube thoracostomy using trauma video review. We hypothesized that factors such as hemodynamic abnormality lead to increased technical difficulty and malpositioning. METHODS: Using trauma video review, we reviewed all emergency department tube thoracostomy from 2020 to 2022. Patients were stratified into hemodynamically abnormal (systolic blood pressure <90 or heart rate >120) and hemodynamically normal (systolic blood pressure ≥90 or heart rate ≤120). Emergency department tube thoracostomies outside of video-capable rooms, with incomplete visualization, or in patients undergoing cardiopulmonary resuscitation or resuscitative thoracotomy were excluded. The primary outcome was a procedure score modified from the validated tool ranging from 0 to 11 (higher score indicating better performance). Also measured were procedural times to (1) decision to place, (2) pleural entry, and (3) procedure completion. Postprocedure x-ray and chart review were used to determine accuracy. RESULTS: In total, 51 videos met the inclusion criteria. The median age was 34 [interquartile range 24-40] years, body mass index 25.8 [interquartile range 21.8-30.7], predominately male (75%), blunt injury (57%), with Injury Severity Score of 22 [14.5-41]. The median procedure score was 9 [7-10]. Emergency department tube thoracostomies in patients with abnormal hemodynamics had significantly lower procedure scores (8 vs 10, P < .05). Hemodynamically abnormal patients had significantly shorter times from decision to proceed to pleural entry (4.05 vs 8.25 minutes, P < .001), and to completion (6.31 vs 14.23 minutes, P < .001). The most common complication was malpositioning (35.1%), with no significant difference noted when comparing hemodynamically normal and abnormal patients (P = .41). CONCLUSION: Using trauma video review we identified significant procedural variability in emergency department tube thoracostomy, mainly that hemodynamic abnormality led to lower proficiency scores and increased malpositioning. Efforts are needed to define procedural benchmarks and evaluation in the context of patient outcomes. Using this technology and methodology can help establish procedural norms.

Educational Experience Impacts Wellness More than Hours Worked.

OBJECTIVE: The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education has focused its interests on resident wellbeing and the clinical work environment in recent years. Concerns regarding both duty hours as well as service obligations versus education resulted in programs nationwide receiving citations, including ours. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of those 2 factors on surgical residents' general wellbeing, hypothesizing that service obligations would be a stronger predictor. DESIGN: We have previously reported on the use of a "Fuel Gauge" tool developed at our institution for monitoring resident wellbeing. We performed a retrospective comparison of prospectively collected cross-sectional survey data comparing the Fuel Gauge to a bimonthly "Service Versus Education" (SVE) report. This report used similar scaling and allowed residents to provide feedback on the balance of the educational quality of their current rotation in comparison to their perception of service obligation. Pearson's correlation was then used to compare those scores with duty hour logs to determine if a relationship could be identified between the 3 measurements. SETTING: Academic institution of the University of Texas Southwestern in Dallas, Texas. PARTICIPANTS: Active general surgery residents (n = 73). RESULTS: During the study period, 73 residents filled out both a Fuel Gauge assessment and a SVE assessment at least once, with 273 complete data points available for analysis. Our program's Fuel Gauge median was 4, and our program's median SVE score was 4. Fuel Gauge assessment scores demonstrated a moderate positive correlation with SVE (r = 0.65, p < 0.001), while only a weakly negative association with increasing hours worked (r = -0.15, p = 0.015). SVE also demonstrated a weak negative correlation with hours logged (r = -0.225, p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: While the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education recognizes that multiple factors contribute to resident wellbeing issues, early efforts were focused on limiting excessive duty hours. Examining our institutional data regarding the previously understudied factor of SVE, we indeed found a stronger correlation with resident perception of low educational value rather than excessive work hours contributing to lower Fuel Gauge scores. These data, if verified, should guide program directors in identifying other institutional factors that may more strongly contribute to their own culture of resident wellness.

Creating a Proficiency-based Remote Laparoscopic Skills Curriculum for the COVID-19 Era.

OBJECTIVE: Social distancing restrictions due to COVID-19 challenged our ability to educate incoming surgery interns who depend on early simulation training for basic skill acquisition. This study aimed to create a proficiency-based laparoscopic skills curriculum using remote learning. DESIGN: Content experts designed 5 surgical tasks to address hand-eye coordination, depth perception, and precision cutting. A scoring formula was used to measure performance: cutoff time - completion time - (K × errors) = score; the constant K was determined for each task. As a benchmark for proficiency, a fellowship-trained laparoscopic surgeon performed 3 consecutive repetitions of each task; proficiency was defined as the surgeon's mean score minus 2 standard deviations. To train remotely, PGY1 surgery residents (n = 29) were each issued a donated portable laparoscopic training box, task explanations, and score sheets. Remote training included submitting a pre-test video, self-training to proficiency, and submitting a post-test video. Construct validity (expert vs. trainee pre-tests) and skill acquisition (trainee pre-tests vs. post-tests) were compared using a Wilcoxon test (median [IQR] reported). SETTING: The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center in Dallas, Texas PARTICIPANTS: Surgery interns RESULTS: Expert and trainee pre-test performance was significantly different for all tasks, supporting construct validity. One trainee was proficient at pre-test. After 1 month of self-training, 7 additional residents achieved proficiency on all 5 tasks after 2-18 repetitions; trainee post-test scores were significantly improved versus pre-test on all tasks (p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: This proficiency-based curriculum demonstrated construct validity, was feasible as a remote teaching option, and resulted in significant skill acquisition. The remote format, including video-based performance assessment, facilitates effective at-home learning and may allow additional innovations such as video-based coaching for more advanced curricula.