Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 36
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
HPB (Oxford) ; 25(6): 704-710, 2023 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36934027

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The diagnosis of postoperative or post-pancreatectomy acute pancreatitis (PPAP) is controversial. In 2021, the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS) published the first unifying definition and grading system for PPAP. This study sought to validate recent consensus criteria, using a cohort of patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) in a high-volume pancreaticobiliary specialty unit. METHODS: All consecutive patients undergoing PD at a tertiary referral centre between January 2016 and December 2021 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients with serum amylase recorded within 48h from surgery were included for analysis. Postoperative data were extracted and evaluated against the ISGPS criteria, including the presence of postoperative hyperamylasaemia, radiologic features consistent with acute pancreatitis, and clinical deterioration. RESULTS: A total of 82 patients were evaluated. The overall incidence of PPAP was 32% (26/82) in this cohort, of which 3/26 demonstrated postoperative hyperamylasaemia and 23/26 had clinically relevant PPAP (Grade B or C) when correlated radiologic and clinical criteria. CONCLUSIONS: This study is among the first to apply the recently published consensus criteria for PPAP diagnosis and grading to clinical data. While the results support their utility in establishing PPAP as a distinct post-pancreatectomy complication, there remains a need for future large-scale validation studies.


Asunto(s)
Pancreatectomía , Pancreatitis , Humanos , Pancreatectomía/efectos adversos , Pancreatectomía/métodos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Enfermedad Aguda , Pancreatitis/etiología , Pancreatitis/complicaciones , Pancreaticoduodenectomía/efectos adversos , Pancreaticoduodenectomía/métodos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/diagnóstico , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Fístula Pancreática/etiología
2.
Ann Surg ; 275(2): 315-323, 2022 02 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33630442

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Infectious complications are common after pancreatoduodenectomy, which in turn are associated with preoperative biliary drainage. Current guidelines recommend a first-generation cephalosporin as perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis. However, some studies support the use of targeted antibiotics. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to evaluate the role of prophylactic targeted antibiotics compared to standard antibiotics in reducing postoperative infections after pancreatoduodenectomy. METHODS: A search from MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane library from 1946 to July 2020 was conducted. Studies were included if they compared targeted antibiotics with standard perioperative antibiotics while including outcome data on surgical site infections (SSI). Targeted therapy was defined as perioperative antibiotics targeting organisms prevalent in bile instrumentation or by culture data obtained from the patient or institution. Outcomes assessed were the rate of SSIs and their microbiology profile. Analyses included demographic data, perioperative antibiotics, postoperative outcomes including microbiology data, and meta-analysis was performed where applicable. RESULTS: Seven studies were included, with a total of 849 patients undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy. Targeted antibiotics were associated with a significantly lower rate of postoperative SSI compared to standard antibiotic therapy [21.1% vs 41.9%; risk ratios (RR) 0.55, 95% confidence interval 0.37-0.81]. Wound/incisional site infections and organ space infections were lower in patients receiving targeted antibiotic prophylaxis (RR 0.33, P = 0.0002 and RR 0.54, P = 0.0004, respectively). Enterococcus species were the most common bacteria reported. CONCLUSION: There was a significant reduction in overall SSI rates when targeted antibiotics was used. Current standard antibiotic prophylaxis is inadequate in covering microbes prevalent in postoperative infections developing after pancreatoduodenectomy.


Asunto(s)
Profilaxis Antibiótica/normas , Pancreaticoduodenectomía , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/prevención & control , Humanos
3.
World J Surg Oncol ; 20(1): 337, 2022 Oct 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36217193

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Prompt and accurate staging of pancreatic cancer is essential to distinguish patients to benefit from resection with curative intent and those with unresectable disease. A staging laparoscopy is used preoperatively to identify macroscopic or occult metastases not identified on imaging. This single-institution study aims to evaluate the role of staging laparoscopy in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma and its effect on overall survival. METHOD: Clinicopathologic data were evaluated for all patients undergoing staging laparoscopy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma from July 2014 to December 2019. The study identified 155 patients eligible for analysis. All patients were followed for at least 2 years. Clinical backgrounds, survival curves and prognostic factors were investigated. RESULTS: Resectability status among the cohort was 62 (40%) upfront resectable, 53 (34%) borderline resectable and 40 (26%) locally advanced disease. The median age was 69, with 44% male patients. Median CA19-9 value was 125 kU/L, and median CA125 value was 22 kU/L. Staging laparoscopy resulted in upstaging nine (15%) upfront resectable patients, five (9%) borderline resectable patients and ten (25%) locally advanced patients. There was positive cytology in 19 (12%), peritoneal deposits in six (4%) and peritoneal liver deposits in seven (5%) patients. Overall, the number needed to treat (NNT) to avoid an unnecessary laparotomy was eight patients. CONCLUSION: Staging laparoscopy continues to be a valuable investigation of pancreatic adenocarcinoma. In this institution, one in every eight patients undergoing a staging laparoscopy was upstaged to metastatic disease, thus avoiding an unnecessary laparotomy or a non-curative resection.


Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma , Laparoscopía , Neoplasias Pancreáticas , Adenocarcinoma/patología , Anciano , Antígeno CA-19-9 , Femenino , Humanos , Laparoscopía/métodos , Masculino , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/patología , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/cirugía , Neoplasias Pancreáticas
4.
HPB (Oxford) ; 24(5): 700-707, 2022 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34674951

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: PuraStat® is a non-bioactive haemostatic agent that has demonstrated efficacy in a number of different surgical procedures. We performed a prospective multi-centre post-market study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of PuraStat® in liver resections performed for metastatic tumors. METHODS: This was a prospective cohort study. Patients undergoing liver resection for metastatic tumor were screened for eligibility, and included if they were ≥18 years old, undergoing open liver resection, had normal liver function, and required application of PuraStat® for haemostasis where standard haemostatic techniques were either insufficient or impractical. The primary endpoint was "time to haemostasis" (TTH). Secondary endpoints included blood loss, total postoperative drainage volume, transfusion of blood products, and ease of use. RESULTS: Eighty patients were included for analysis in the intention to treat population. 207 bleeding sites were treated with PuraStat. Of these, 190 (91.7%) bleeding sites reached haemostasis after PuraStat® application. Mean TTH (mm:ss) was 1:01 (SD 1:06, range 0:09-6:55). Ease of use of the product was described as either "excellent" or "good" in 78 (98.8%) patients. No serious adverse events were identified. CONCLUSION: This study confirms the safety, efficacy and ease of use of PuraStat® in the management of bleeding in liver surgery.


Asunto(s)
Hemostáticos , Adolescente , Hemorragia/etiología , Hemostáticos/efectos adversos , Hepatectomía/efectos adversos , Humanos , Hígado , Estudios Prospectivos
5.
Int J Cancer ; 148(6): 1508-1518, 2021 03 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33128797

RESUMEN

Our study aimed to identify a urinary metabolite panel for the detection/diagnosis of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). PDAC continues to have poor survival outcomes. One of the major reasons for poor prognosis is the advanced stage of the disease at diagnosis. Hence, identification of a novel and cost-effective biomarker signature for early detection/diagnosis of PDAC could lead to better survival outcomes. Untargeted metabolomics was employed to identify a novel metabolite-based biomarker signature for PDAC diagnosis. Urinary metabolites from 92 PDAC patients (56 discovery cohort and 36 validation cohort) were compared with 56 healthy volunteers using 1 H nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Multivariate (partial-least squares discriminate analysis) and univariate (Mann-Whitney's U-test) analyses were performed to identify a metabolite panel which can be used to detect PDAC. The selected metabolites were further validated for their diagnostic potential using the area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curve. Statistical analysis identified a six-metabolite panel (trigonelline, glycolate, hippurate, creatine, myoinositol and hydroxyacetone), which demonstrated high potential to diagnose PDAC, with AUROC of 0.933 and 0.864 in the discovery and validation cohort, respectively. Notably, the identified panel also demonstrated very high potential to diagnose early-stage (I and II) PDAC patients with AUROC of 0.897. These results demonstrate that the selected metabolite signature could be used to detect PDAC and will pave the way for the development of a urinary test for detection/diagnosis of PDAC.


Asunto(s)
Biomarcadores de Tumor/orina , Carcinoma Ductal Pancreático/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/diagnóstico , Anciano , Carcinoma Ductal Pancreático/orina , Detección Precoz del Cáncer/métodos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Metabolómica/métodos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/orina , Urinálisis/métodos
6.
Mod Pathol ; 33(9): 1811-1821, 2020 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32358589

RESUMEN

There is now evidence that gene fusions activating the MAPK pathway are relatively common in pancreatic acinar cell carcinoma with potentially actionable BRAF or RET fusions being found in ~30%. We sought to investigate the incidence of RAF1 fusions in pancreatic malignancies with acinar cell differentiation. FISH testing for RAF1 was undertaken on 30 tumors comprising 25 'pure' acinar cell carcinomas, 2 mixed pancreatic acinar-neuroendocrine carcinomas, 1 mixed acinar cell-low grade neuroendocrine tumor and 2 pancreatoblastomas. RAF1 rearrangements were identified in 5 cases and confirmed by DNA and RNA sequencing to represent oncogenic fusions (GATM-RAF1, GOLGA4-RAF1, PDZRN3-RAF1, HERPUD1-RAF1 and TRIM33-RAF1) and to be mutually exclusive with BRAF and RET fusions, as well as KRAS mutations. Large genome-wide copy number changes were common and included 1q gain and/or 1p loss in all five RAF1 FISH-positive acinar cell carcinomas. RAF1 expression by immunohistochemistry was found in 3 of 5 (60%) of fusion-positive cases and no FISH-negative cases. Phospho-ERK1/2 expression was found in 4 of 5 RAF1-fusion-positive cases. Expression of both RAF1 and phospho-ERK1/2 was heterogeneous and often only detected at the tumor-stroma interface, thus limiting their clinical utility. We conclude that RAF1 gene rearrangements are relatively common in pancreatic acinar cell carcinomas (14.3% to 18.5% of cases) and can be effectively identified by FISH with follow up molecular testing. The combined results of several studies now indicate that BRAF, RET or RAF1 fusions occur in between one third and one-half of these tumors but are extremely rare in other pancreatic malignancies. As these fusions are potentially actionable with currently available therapies, a strong argument can be made to perform FISH or molecular testing on all pancreatic acinar cell carcinomas.


Asunto(s)
Carcinoma de Células Acinares/genética , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/genética , Proteínas Proto-Oncogénicas c-raf/genética , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Carcinoma de Células Acinares/patología , Bases de Datos Factuales , Femenino , Fusión Génica , Reordenamiento Génico , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/patología , Adulto Joven
7.
Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) ; 92(5): 396-406, 2020 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32017157

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Type 3c diabetes mellitus (T3cDM) occurring post pancreatectomy can be challenging to treat due to the frequent combination of decreased circulating levels of insulin and glucagon and concurrent exocrine insufficiency. Relatively, little is known regarding the risk factors for development of T3cDM post pancreatectomy. Our aim was to review the literature and assess what is known of the risk factors for the development of new-onset DM following partial pancreatic resection and where possible determines the incidence, time of onset and the management approach to hyperglycaemia in this context. DESIGN: Medline and Embase databases were reviewed using specific keyword criteria. Original manuscripts published in 1990 or later included. Articles with study population <20, lacking information on new-onset DM, follow-up duration or specifically targeting rare procedures/pathology were excluded. The Newcastle Ottawa Quality Assessment form was applied. Results reported according to PRISMA guidelines. Pooled effect size calculated using random effects model. PATIENTS: Thirty six articles were identified that described a total of 5636 patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy, 3922 patients having distal pancreatectomy and 315 with central pancreatectomy. RESULTS: The incidence of new-onset DM was significantly different between different types of resection from 9% to 24% after pancreaticoduodenectomy (pooled estimate 16%; 95% CI: 14%-17%), 3%-40% after distal pancreatectomy (pooled estimate 21%; 95% CI: 16%-25%) and 0%-14% after central pancreatectomy (pooled estimate 6%; 95% CI: 3%-9%). Surgical site, higher preoperative HbA1c, fasting plasma glucose and lower remnant pancreatic volume had strongest associations with new-onset DM. CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review supports that risk of development of T3cDM is associated with type of pancreatic resection, lower remnant pancreatic volume and higher preoperative HbA1c.


Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus , Neoplasias Pancreáticas , Diabetes Mellitus/etiología , Humanos , Pancreatectomía/efectos adversos , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/cirugía , Pancreaticoduodenectomía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Factores de Riesgo
8.
HPB (Oxford) ; 22(11): 1631-1636, 2020 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32247587

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) remains a prominent complication following pancreatic cancer resections. The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the histological changes that occur in the pancreas due to neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) by comparing the acinar, collagen and fat scores in resected PDAC specimens of patients who did and did not receive NAT. Secondary aims included (1) the difference in rates of POPF in PDAC patients who received NAT versus upfront resection; and (2) the association between acinar/collagen/fat scores and the development of POPF. METHODS: Consecutive patients who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy for PDAC, with and without NAT were included for analysis. Acinar, collagen and fat scores were determined from histology slides of the pancreatic resection margin. RESULTS: One hundred and thirty-four patients were included. There was a significant decrease in the median acinar score (48 vs 23, p = 0.003) and increase in the collagen score (28 vs 50, p = 0.011) for patients who received NAT and a significant correlation with the number of cycles of NAT. This study found no statistical difference between NAT and the development of POPF. CONCLUSION: The use of NAT in the treatment of PDAC changes the composition of the pancreas.


Asunto(s)
Terapia Neoadyuvante , Neoplasias Pancreáticas , Humanos , Terapia Neoadyuvante/efectos adversos , Páncreas/diagnóstico por imagen , Páncreas/cirugía , Fístula Pancreática/etiología , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/cirugía , Pancreaticoduodenectomía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias
9.
J Surg Res ; 238: 127-136, 2019 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30771682

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a common cause of cancer death worldwide. Resection offers the best chance of long-term survival, but a consistent adverse prognostic factor is the presence of microvascular invasion (MVI). In this study, surface-enhanced laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (SELDI-TOF MS), a high throughput method of analyzing complex samples, was used to explore differentially expressed proteins between HCC and adjacent nontumour liver tissue (ANLT). These findings were correlated with clinical outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From 2002 to 2011, tumor and ANLT were collected from patients who underwent liver resection and these samples were later prepared for SELDI-TOF MS. Output data were then used to identify proteins capable of discriminating HCC from ANLT. Proteins from the multivariate analysis were then analyzed to determine prognostic factors and the m/z ratios of these proteins were entered into the ExPASy database to infer potential candidates. RESULTS: During the study period, 30 patients had SELDI-TOF MS performed on their HCC and ANLT samples. On multivariate analysis, a panel of four proteins-m/z 5840, m/z 8921, m/z 9961, and m/z 25,872-discriminated HCC from ANLT with an area under the ROC curve of 0.954 (P < 0.001). On prognostic factor assessment, decreased m/z 9961 was significantly associated with the presence of MVI (P = 0.025) and shorter disease-free survival (P = 0.045) in our patients. A potential candidate for this protein was coxsackievirus and adenovirus receptor, isoform 3 (CAR 3/7), which helps maintain tight junction integrity. CONCLUSIONS: Using SELDI TOF-MS, we identified a panel of four proteins with excellent discriminative capacity between HCC and ANLT. Of these, m/z 9961 was the only protein significantly associated with a known poor prognostic factor (presence of MVI) and survival (shorter disease-free survival). While loss of CAR 3/7 could lead to MVI, further research is warranted to validate the identity of protein m/z 9961.


Asunto(s)
Biomarcadores de Tumor/análisis , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/patología , Neoplasias Hepáticas/patología , Espectrometría de Masa por Láser de Matriz Asistida de Ionización Desorción , Anciano , Australia/epidemiología , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/mortalidad , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/cirugía , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Femenino , Hepatectomía , Humanos , Hígado/irrigación sanguínea , Hígado/patología , Hígado/cirugía , Neoplasias Hepáticas/mortalidad , Neoplasias Hepáticas/cirugía , Masculino , Microvasos/patología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Invasividad Neoplásica/diagnóstico , Invasividad Neoplásica/patología , Pronóstico , Estudios Prospectivos , Proteómica/métodos , Análisis de Supervivencia
10.
Langenbecks Arch Surg ; 404(2): 253-255, 2019 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30758668

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Delayed massive post-pancreatectomy haemorrhage (PPH) is a highly lethal complication after pancreatectomy. Angiographic procedures have led to improved outcomes in the management of these patients. In the setting of an acute haemorrhage, laparotomy and packing are often required to help stablise the patient. However, re-operative surgery in the post-pancreatectomy setting is technically challenging. METHODS: A novel strategy of incorporating the resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) is described. RESULTS: Two patients where the specific application of this technique uses the REBOA were described. CONCLUSION: The REBOA serves as a useful adjunct in haemorrhage control and haemodynamic stablisation to allow successful management of delayed massive PPH.


Asunto(s)
Oclusión con Balón/métodos , Pancreatectomía/efectos adversos , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/cirugía , Hemorragia Posoperatoria/diagnóstico por imagen , Hemorragia Posoperatoria/terapia , Anciano , Aneurisma Falso/diagnóstico por imagen , Aneurisma Falso/terapia , Aorta Abdominal/diagnóstico por imagen , Angiografía por Tomografía Computarizada/métodos , Procedimientos Endovasculares/métodos , Fluoroscopía/métodos , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Pancreatectomía/métodos , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/patología , Muestreo , Resultado del Tratamiento
11.
HPB (Oxford) ; 21(5): 604-611, 2019 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30377050

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Acinar score calculated at the pancreatic resection margin is associated with postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) after pancreatoduodenectomy (PD). The present study evaluates the association between (i) computed tomography (CT) density of the pancreas and the acinar score of the pancreatic resection margin, and (ii) CT density of the pancreas and POPF after PD. METHODS: Consecutive patients who underwent PD were included for analysis. CT densities of the pancreatic head, neck, body and tail were measured in non-contrast (NC), arterial (ART) and portal venous (PV) phases. Histologic slides of the pancreatic resection margin were scored for acinar cell density. RESULTS: Ninety patients were included for analysis. Non-contrast density of the pancreatic tail was a good predictor of POPF (AUROC 0.704, p = 0.036), and a cut-off value of >40 Hounsfield units predicted POPF with 70.0% sensitivity and 73.4% specificity. The ratio of densities between PV and NC phases in the pancreatic tail was also a good predictor of POPF (AUROC 0.712, p = 0.030), and a cut-off value of <2.29 predicted POPF with 70.9% sensitivity and 80% specificity. CONCLUSION: Non-contrast CT density of the pancreatic tail correlates with acinar cell density of the pancreatic resection margin and predicts the development of POPF after PD.


Asunto(s)
Células Acinares , Enfermedades Pancreáticas/cirugía , Fístula Pancreática/clasificación , Pancreaticoduodenectomía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/clasificación , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X/métodos , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Márgenes de Escisión , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos
12.
HPB (Oxford) ; 20(5): 432-440, 2018 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29307511

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: There has been recent evidence supporting post-pancreatectomy pancreatitis as a factor in the development of postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF). The aims of this study were to evaluate: (i) the correlation of the acinar cell density at the pancreatic resection margin with the intra-operative amylase concentration (IOAC) of peri-pancreatic fluid, postoperative pancreatitis, and POPF; and (ii) the association between postoperative pancreatitis on the first postoperative day and POPF. METHODS: Consecutive patients who underwent pancreatic resection between June 2016 and July 2017 were included for analysis. Fluid for IOAC was collected, and amylase concentration was determined in drain fluid on postoperative days 1, 3, and 5. Serum amylase and lipase and urinary trypsinogen-2 concentrations were determined on the first postoperative day. Histology slides of the pancreatic resection margin were scored for acinar cell density. RESULTS: Sixty-one patients were included in the analysis. Acinar cell density significantly correlated with IOAC (r = 0.566, p < 0.001), and was significantly associated with postoperative pancreatitis (p < 0.001), and POPF (p = 0.003). Postoperative pancreatitis was significantly associated with the development of POPF (OR 17.81, 95%CI 2.17-145.9, p = 0.001). DISCUSSION: The development of POPF may involve a complex interaction between acinar cell density, immediate leakage of pancreatic fluid, and postoperative pancreatitis.


Asunto(s)
Células Acinares/patología , Márgenes de Escisión , Pancreatectomía/efectos adversos , Fístula Pancreática/etiología , Pancreaticoduodenectomía/efectos adversos , Pancreatitis/etiología , Células Acinares/enzimología , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Amilasas/sangre , Biomarcadores/sangre , Biomarcadores/orina , Biopsia , Femenino , Humanos , Lipasa/sangre , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Fístula Pancreática/enzimología , Fístula Pancreática/patología , Pancreatitis/enzimología , Pancreatitis/patología , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Tripsina/orina , Tripsinógeno/orina
13.
Pancreas ; 2024 May 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38696382

RESUMEN

AIM: Postoperative pancreatic fistula(POPF) represents a leading cause of morbidity and mortality following major pancreatic resections. This study aimed to evaluate the use of post-operative drain fluid lipase-to-amylase ratio(LAR) for the prediction of clinically relevant fistulae(CR-POPF). METHODS: Consecutive patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy between 2017-2021 at a tertiary centre were retrospectively reviewed. Univariable and multivariable analyses were performed to identify predictors for CR-POPF(ISGPS Grades B/C). Receiver operator characteristic(ROC) curve analyses were conducted to evaluate the performance of LAR and determine optimum prediction thresholds. RESULTS: Among 130 patients, 28(21.5%) developed CR-POPF. Variables positively associated with CR-POPF included soft gland texture, acinar cell density, diagnosis other than PDAC or chronic pancreatitis, resection without neoadjuvant therapy, and postoperative drain fluid lipase, amylase, and LAR(all p < 0.05). Multivariable regression analysis identified LAR as an independent predictor of CR-POPF(p < 0.05). ROC curve analysis showed that LAR had moderate ability to predict CR-POPF on POD1(AUC = 0.64,95%CI = 0.54-0.74) and excellent ability on POD3(AUC = 0.85,95%CI = 0.78-0.92) and POD5(AUC = 0.86,95%CI = 0.79-0.92). Optimum thresholds were consistent over POD1-5 (ratio > 2.6) and associated with 92% sensitivity and 46-71% specificity. CONCLUSION: Postoperative drain fluid LAR represents a reliable predictor for the development of CR-POPF. With early prognostication, the postoperative care of patients deemed at risk of developing high-grade fistulas may be optimised.

14.
Cancers (Basel) ; 16(4)2024 Feb 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38398089

RESUMEN

Perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (pCCA) is an uncommon malignancy with generally poor prognosis. Surgery is the primary curative treatment; however, the perioperative mortality and morbidity rates are high, with a low 5-year survival rate. Use of preoperative prognostic biomarkers to predict survival outcomes after surgery for pCCA are not well-established currently. This systematic review aimed to identify and summarise preoperative biomarkers associated with survival in pCCA, thereby potentially improving treatment decision-making. The Embase, Medline, and Cochrane databases were searched, and a systematic review was performed using the PRISMA guidelines. English-language studies examining the association between serum and/or tissue-derived biomarkers in pCCA and overall and/or disease-free survival were included. Our systematic review identified 64 biomarkers across 48 relevant studies. Raised serum CA19-9, bilirubin, CEA, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) and tumour MMP9, and low serum albumin were most associated with poorer survival; however, the cutoff values used widely varied. Several promising molecular markers with prognostic significance were also identified, including tumour HMGA2, MUC5AC/6, IDH1, PIWIL2, and DNA index. In conclusion, several biomarkers have been identified in serum and tumour specimens that prognosticate overall and disease-free survival after pCCA resection. These, however, require external validation in large cohort studies and/or in preoperatively obtained specimens, especially tissue biopsy, to recommend their use.

15.
ANZ J Surg ; 93(1-2): 125-131, 2023 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36574292

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Unplanned surgical readmissions are an important indicator of quality care and are a key focus of improvement programs. The aims of this study were to evaluate the factors that lead to unplanned hospital readmissions in patients undergoing general surgical procedures and to identify preventable readmissions. METHODS: A retrospective review of the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database from 2016 to 2020 at a tertiary hospital was conducted to identify patients undergoing a general surgical procedure. Various perioperative parameters were studied to identify risk factors and reasons for unplanned readmission. Preventable readmissions were identified. RESULTS: A total of 3069 patients underwent a general surgical procedure. Of these, the overall unplanned readmission rate was 8.8% (n = 247). The most common reason for readmission was associated with surgical site infections (n = 112, 44.3%) followed by pain (n = 50, 20.2%), with over 45% deemed as preventable readmissions. Factors associated with increased risk of readmission included older age, longer index length of stay, prolonged operative time, elective procedures, higher ASA score and contaminated procedures. CONCLUSION: Unplanned readmissions are more likely to occur in patients who develop postoperative complications. Understanding factors associated with readmissions may facilitate targeted quality improvement projects that reduce hospital readmission after surgery.


Asunto(s)
Readmisión del Paciente , Mejoramiento de la Calidad , Humanos , Nueva Zelanda/epidemiología , Australia/epidemiología , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/epidemiología , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/prevención & control , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/complicaciones , Factores de Riesgo , Estudios Retrospectivos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología
16.
ANZ J Surg ; 93(11): 2648-2654, 2023 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37772445

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Despite its proposed benefits, laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy (LPD) has not been widely adopted due to its technical complexity and steep learning curve. The aim of this study was to report a single surgeon's experience in the stepwise implementation of LPD and evolution of technique over a nine-year period in a moderate-high volume unit. METHODS: Carefully selected patients underwent LPD initially by hybrid approach (laparoscopic resection and open reconstruction), which evolved into a total LPD (laparoscopic resection and reconstruction). Data was prospectively collected to include patient characteristics, intraoperative data, evolution of technique and postoperative outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 25 patients underwent hybrid LPD (HLPD) and 20 patients underwent total LPD (TLPD). There was no 90-day mortality. Three patients developed a postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF), all of which occurred in patients undergoing HLPD. There was no POPF in 20 consecutive TLPD. There was no evidence of anastomotic strictures in the hepaticojejunostomy in patients undergoing TLPD at long term follow up. CONCLUSION: A gradual and cautious progression from HLPD to TLPD is essential to ensure safe implementation into a unit. LPD should only be considered in carefully selected patients, with outcomes subjected to regular and rigorous independent audit.


Asunto(s)
Laparoscopía , Neoplasias Pancreáticas , Humanos , Pancreaticoduodenectomía/efectos adversos , Pancreaticoduodenectomía/métodos , Pancreatectomía , Páncreas/cirugía , Anastomosis Quirúrgica , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Fístula Pancreática/etiología , Laparoscopía/métodos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tiempo de Internación , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/cirugía
17.
Cancers (Basel) ; 14(15)2022 Jul 25.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35892879

RESUMEN

The genomic heterogeneity of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is becoming increasingly appreciated. We aimed to evaluate the ability of a triple biomarker panel (S100A4, Ca-125, and mesothelin) to predict: (i) genetic PDAC subtypes; (ii) clinical phenotypes; and (iii) the optimal treatment strategy (neoadjuvant vs. surgery-first) in resectable and borderline resectable PDAC. Patients who underwent resection for resectable and borderline resectable PDAC were included from one single-institutional cohort and one multi-institutional cohort from the Australian Pancreatic Genome Initiative (APGI). Tumors were immunohistochemically evaluated for S100A4, Ca-125, and mesothelin, and a subset from the APGI cohort underwent RNA sequencing. This study included 252 and 226 patients from the single institution and the APGI cohorts, respectively. Triple-negative biomarker status correlated with non-squamous PDAC genotypes (p = 0.020), lower rates of distant recurrence (p = 0.002), and longer median overall survival (mOS) with the surgery-first approach compared with neoadjuvant treatment (33.3 vs. 22.2 mths, p = 0.038) in resectable PDAC. In contrast, the triple-positive disease was associated with longer mOS with neoadjuvant treatment compared with the surgery-first approach (29.5 vs. 13.7 mths, p = 0.021) in resectable and borderline resectable PDAC. In conclusion, the triple biomarker panel predicts genetic PDAC subtypes, clinical phenotypes, and optimal treatment strategies in resectable and borderline resectable PDAC.

18.
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci ; 28(6): 533-541, 2021 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33665934

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) is a potentially lethal complication of pancreatic surgery. POPF rate is consistently higher after distal pancreatectomy (DP) compared with pancreatoduodenectomy (PD). The acinar score of the remnant pancreas is associated with postoperative pancreatitis and POPF. This study aimed to: (i) confirm the difference in POPF rate after DP vs PD; (ii) confirm the association between acinar score and POPF; and (iii) evaluate the difference in acinar scores between DP and PD. METHODS: Patients undergoing DP or PD at a single institution from 2011 to 2017 were included. Hematoxylin and eosin-stained slides of the pancreatic resection margin were evaluated for all patients and scored for acinar cell density. Clinicopathological data were retrieved from a prospectively maintained database. RESULTS: Two hundred and ninety-four patients were included in the analysis (206 PD, 88 DP). The POPF rate was significantly higher after DP than PD (20.4% vs 11.2%, P = .043). Acinar score >50 was independently associated with the development of POPF (OR 6.457, P = .003). DP was associated with a higher median acinar score than PD (65 vs 50, P < .001). CONCLUSION: The POPF rate is significantly higher after DP compared with PD and is attributable to a higher acinar score of the pancreatic resection margin.


Asunto(s)
Fístula Pancreática , Pancreaticoduodenectomía , Humanos , Páncreas/cirugía , Pancreatectomía/efectos adversos , Fístula Pancreática/epidemiología , Fístula Pancreática/etiología , Pancreaticoduodenectomía/efectos adversos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo
19.
Biochim Biophys Acta Gen Subj ; 1865(11): 129966, 2021 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34329704

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) have a very low survival rate and surgical resection is the only curative intent treatment available. However, the majority of patients relapse after surgery and identification of biomarkers for accurate prognostication of PDAC patients is required. We have recently identified a six biomarker (i.e., trigonelline, glycolate, hippurate, creatine, myoinositol and hydroxyacetone) urinary metabolite panel with very high potential to diagnose PDAC (Int J Cancer 2021;148:1508-18). This study aimed to assess the prognostic ability of these previously identified diagnostic metabolites in the urine of PDAC patients. METHODS: Metabolite data from 88 PDAC patients was statistically assessed for their prognostic ability. RESULTS: A panel of three metabolites (i.e., trigonelline, hippurate and myoinositol) was able to stratify patients with good- or poor-prognosis based on overall survival. The PDAC patients with abnormal levels of 2 or more metabolites in their urine demonstrated significantly lower survival compared to patients with abnormal levels of one or less metabolites. CONCLUSION: These results demonstrate that the selected three metabolite panel could be used to stratify patients based on their prognostic outcomes and if independently validated may lead to the development of a urinary prognostic biomarker test for PDAC. GENERAL SIGNIFICANCE: This study highlights the potential of using 1H-nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy for the identification of novel metabolites which can prognosticate cancer patients.


Asunto(s)
Biomarcadores de Tumor/orina , Carcinoma Ductal Pancreático/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/diagnóstico , Anciano , Biomarcadores de Tumor/metabolismo , Carcinoma Ductal Pancreático/metabolismo , Carcinoma Ductal Pancreático/orina , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/metabolismo , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/orina
20.
Eur J Surg Oncol ; 47(10): 2543-2550, 2021 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33952409

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Pancreatic cancer is the 8th commonest cancer and the 5th commonest cause of cancer-related death in Australia, with a 9% average 5-year survival. This study aims to investigate the effects of neoadjuvant treatment on overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) in borderline resectable (BRPC) and locally advanced (LAPC) pancreatic adenocarcinoma followed by curative resection. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Prospectively-collected demographic, medical, surgical and pathological data of patients with BRPC and LAPC treated with both neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) and surgery at a single tertiary referral centre in Australia were reviewed and analysed. RESULTS: Between 2012 and 2018, 60 patients, 34 with BRPC and 26 with LAPC, were treated with NAT followed by curative resection. The commonest neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimens were Gemcitabine + Abraxane (51.7%) and FOLFIRINOX (35.0%), with 48.3% of patients additionally receiving neoadjuvant radiotherapy. Median RFS was 30 months and median OS was 35 months. On multivariable analysis, inferior OS was predicted by enlarged loco-regional lymph nodes on initial computed tomography (p = 0.032), larger tumour size post-NAT (p = 0.006) and Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events post-NAT toxicity greater than grade 2 (p = 0.015). LAPC patients received more neoadjuvant chemotherapy (p = 0.008) and radiotherapy (p = 0.021) than BRPC and achieved a superior pathological response (p = 0.010). CONCLUSION: Patients who respond to NAT likely have a favourable disease biology and will progress well following resection. It is these patients who should be selected for more aggressive upfront management, and those with resistant disease should be spared from high-risk surgery.


Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma/patología , Adenocarcinoma/terapia , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/patología , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/terapia , Adulto , Anciano , Paclitaxel Unido a Albúmina/administración & dosificación , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Desoxicitidina/administración & dosificación , Desoxicitidina/análogos & derivados , Femenino , Fluorouracilo/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Irinotecán/uso terapéutico , Leucovorina/uso terapéutico , Ganglios Linfáticos/patología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Terapia Neoadyuvante/efectos adversos , Oxaliplatino/administración & dosificación , Oxaliplatino/uso terapéutico , Pancreatectomía/efectos adversos , Pancreaticoduodenectomía/efectos adversos , Radioterapia Adyuvante , Radioterapia de Intensidad Modulada , Tasa de Supervivencia , Carga Tumoral , Gemcitabina
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA