Medical Malpractice and Trigeminal Neuralgia: An Analysis of 49 Cases.

PURPOSE: Our study fills the vacancy of litigation research related to trigeminal neuralgia management, giving health care providers the information needed to understand the potential litigious outcomes that follow treatment methods. METHODS: We queried the Westlaw database to identify litigation cases related to trigeminal neuralgia management. Key variables extracted included medical complaints, trial outcomes, and demographics. Continuous variables were compared between cases in favor of defendant and cases in favor of plaintiff using t-test or Wilcoxon rank sum test. Categorial variables were compared using χ2 or Fisher exact test. RESULTS: About 49 cases met the inclusion criteria-for those cases surgical complications (42.9%) were cited as the most common reasons for malpractice claims. Cranial nerve deficits (34.7%) were the most frequent postoperative complaints. Verdicts ruled in favor of the plaintiff in 26.5% of cases with a mean payout of $1,982,428.46. Dentists were included in the most cases, 63.3%, and the average payout was $415,908, whereas neurosurgeons were involved in 20.4% of cases with an average payout of $618,775. Cases with verdicts in favor of the plaintiff were more likely to be older than cases with verdicts in favor of the defendant (P = .03). CONCLUSIONS: Over one-half of cases resulted in verdicts in favor of the defendant with surgical complications cited as the most common reason for litigation. Dentistry was the most common individual clinical specialty for defendants, whereas neurosurgery contributed to the largest average payout based on specialty (for n > 1). Cranial nerve deficits were the most common plaintiff postoperative complaints. These analyses may help doctor teams involved in management of trigeminal neuralgia to have a more informed discussion with the patient at every visit so that such litigations may be avoided.

A Predictive Model for Functional Outcome in Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke Undergoing Endovascular Thrombectomy.

INTRODUCTION: Endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) is a well-established treatment of acute ischemic stroke. Variability in outcomes among thrombectomy patients results in a need for patient centered approaches to recovery. Identifying key factors that are associated with outcomes can help prognosticate and direct resources for continued improvement post-treatment. Thus, we developed a comprehensive predictive model of short-term outcomes post-thrombectomy. METHODS: This is a retrospective chart review of adult patients who underwent EVT at our institution over the last four years. Primary outcome was dichotomized 90-day mRS (mRS 0-2 v mRS 3-6). Bivariate analyses were conducted, followed by logistic regression modelling via a backward-elimination approach to identify the best fit predictive model. RESULTS: 326 thrombectomies were performed; 230 cases were included in the model. In the final predictive model, adjusting for age, gender, race, diabetes, and presenting NIHSS, pre-admission mRS = 0-2 (OR 18.1; 95% 3.44-95.48; p < 0.001) was the strongest predictor of a good outcome at 90-days. Other independent predictors of good outcomes included being a non-smoker (OR 5.4; 95% CI 1.53-19.00; p = 0.01) and having a post-thrombectomy NIHSS<10 (OR 9.7; 95% CI 3.90-24.27; p < 0.001). A decompressive hemicraniectomy (DHC) was predictive of a poor outcome at 90-days (OR 0.07; 95% CI 0.01-0.72; p = 0.03). This model had a Sensitivity of 79%, a Specificity of 89% and an AUC=0.89. CONCLUSION: Our model identified low pre-admission mRS score, low post-thrombectomy NIHSS, non-smoker status and not requiring a DHC as predictors of good functional outcomes at 90-days. Future works include developing a prognostic scoring system.

Medical malpractice and meningiomas: an analysis of 47 cases.

OBJECTIVE: Among medical practices, surgical fields, including neurosurgery, are at a high risk for medical malpractice litigation. With meningiomas contributing to 10% of the total neurosurgery litigation cases, the aim of this study was to identify demographic characteristics, reasons for litigation, and surgical complications commonly reported in these cases. This analysis serves to increase neurosurgeons' awareness of factors associated with medical malpractice litigation. METHODS: The online legal database Westlaw was utilized to query public litigation cases related to the medical management of meningiomas between December 1985 and May 2020. Variables extracted included the following: plaintiff and defendant demographics, litigation category, plaintiff medical complaints, and trial outcomes. The authors compared these characteristics between cases with decisions in favor of the defendant and those with decisions in favor of the plaintiff. RESULTS: A total of 47 cases met the inclusion criteria. Failure to diagnose (68.1%) was the most common type of malpractice claim, and surgical complications (19.1%), motor weakness (33%), and financial loss (33%) were cited as the most common postoperative complaints. Individual specialties that most often required defense due to malpractice claims were radiology (21.7%) and neurosurgery (19.6%). The jury verdict was in favor of the defense in 51.1% of cases and in favor of the plaintiff in 27.7% of cases. A settlement was reached in 19.1% of cases. The mean payout for a verdict in favor of the plaintiff was $3,409,650.22, while the mean payout for settlements was $867,555.56. The greatest average payout for specialties was in neurosurgery at $3,414,400, followed by radiology at $3,192,960. Cases with a verdict in favor of the plaintiff were more likely to involve an internal medicine physician as a defendant (p = 0.007). CONCLUSIONS: Over one-half of the cases resulted in a defendant's verdict with failure to diagnose cited as the most common reason for litigation. Radiology and neurosurgery were the most common specialties for legal cases and also had some of the largest average payouts based on specialty. Motor weakness and financial loss were the most common plaintiff postoperative complaints. These findings may inform surgeons on active measures to take, such as increasing focus on diagnostic accuracy and reducing specific postoperative complaints, such as motor weakness, through risk management and prophylactic measures, to reduce unfavorable legal outcomes.

Racial Disparities in Perioperative Morbidity Following Oncological Spine Surgery.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVE: To assess the impact of race on complications following spinal tumor surgery. METHODS: Adults with cancer who underwent spine tumor surgery were identified in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program datasets from 2012 to 2016. Clavien-Dindo Grade I-II (minor complications) and Clavien-Dindo Grade III-V (major complications including 30-day mortality) complications were compared between non-Hispanic Whites (NHW) and Black patients. A multivariable analysis was also conducted. RESULTS: Of 1,226 identified patients, 85.9% were NHW (n = 1,053) and 14.1% were Black (n = 173). The overall rate of Grade I-II complications was 16.2%; 15.1% for NHW patients and 23.1% for Black patients (P = .008). On multivariable analysis, Black patients had significantly higher odds of having a minor complication (OR 1.87; 95% CI, 1.16-3.01; P = .010). On the other hand, the overall rate of Grade III-V complications was 13.3%; 12.5% for NHW patients and 16.2% for Black patients (P = .187). On multivariable analysis, Black race was not independently associated with major complications (OR 1.26; 95% CI, 0.71-2.23; P = .430). Median length of stay was 8 days (IQR 5-13) for NHW patients and 10 days (IQR 6-15) for Black patients (P = .011). CONCLUSION: Black patients who underwent metastatic spinal tumor surgery were at a significantly increased risk of perioperative morbidity compared to NHW patients independent of baseline and operative characteristics. Major complications did not differ between groups. Race should be further studied in the context of metastatic spine disease to improve our understanding of these disparities.

Predictors of Radiographic and Symptomatic Hemorrhagic Conversion Following Endovascular Thrombectomy for Acute Ischemic Stroke Due to Large Vessel Occlusion.

Background Endovascular therapy is known to achieve a high rate of recanalization in patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) due to large vessel occlusion (LVO) and is currently the standard of care. Hemorrhagic conversion is a severe complication that may occur following AIS in patients undergoing endovascular thrombectomy (EVT). There is a scarcity of data on the risk factors related to HV in post-EVT patients, especially those who develop symptomatic hemorrhagic conversion. The main objective of our study is to identify independent predictors of radiographic and symptomatic hemorrhagic conversion in our diverse patient population with multiple baseline comorbidities that presented with AIS and were treated with EVT as per the most updated guidelines and practices. Methodology This is a retrospective chart review in which we enrolled adult patients treated with EVT for AIS at a comprehensive stroke center in the Bronx, NY, over a four-year period. Bivariate analyses followed by multiple logistic regression modeling were performed to determine the independent predictors of all and symptomatic hemorrhagic conversion. Results A total of 326 patients who underwent EVT for AIS were enrolled. Of these, 74 (22.7%) had an HC, while 252 (77.3%) did not. In total, 25 out of the 74 (33.7%) patients were symptomatic. In the logistic regression model, a history of prior ischemic stroke (odds ratio (OR) = 2.197; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.062-4.545; p-value = 0.034), Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (ASPECTS) of <6 (OR = 2.207; 95% CI = 1.477-7.194; p-value = 0.019), and Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction (TICI) 2B-3 recanalization (OR = 2.551; 95% CI = 1.998-6.520; p-value=0.045) were found to be independent predictors of all types of hemorrhagic conversion. The only independent predictor of symptomatic hemorrhagic conversion on multiple logistic regression modeling was an elevated international normalized ratio (INR) (OR = 11.051; 95% CI = 1.866-65.440; p-value = 0.008). Conclusions History of prior ischemic stroke, low ASPECTS score, and TICI 2B-3 recanalization are independent predictors of hemorrhagic conversion while an elevated INR is the only independent predictor of symptomatic hemorrhagic conversion in post-thrombectomy patients.

The Effect of a Multidisciplinary Spine Clinic on Time to Care in Patients with Chronic Back and/or Leg Pain: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.

Chronic back and leg pain are leading causes of disability worldwide. The purpose of this study was to compare the care in a unidisciplinary (USC) versus multidisciplinary (MSC) spine clinic, where patients are evaluated by different specialists during the same office visit. Adult patients presenting with a chief complaint of back and/or leg pain between June 2018 and July 2019 were assessed for eligibility. The main outcome measures included the first treatment recommendations, the time to treatment order, and the time to treatment occurrence. A 1:1 propensity score-matched analysis was performed on 874 patients (437 in each group). For all patients, the most common recommendation was physical therapy (41.4%), followed by injection (14.6%), and surgery (9.7%). Patients seen in the MSC were more likely to be recommended injection (p < 0.001) and less likely to be recommended surgery as first treatment (p = 0.001). They also had significantly shorter times to the injection order (log-rank test, p = 0.004) and the injection occurrence (log-rank test, p < 0.001). In this study, more efficient care for patients with back and/or leg pain was delivered in the MSC setting, which was evidenced by the shorter times to the injection order and occurrence. The impact of the MSC approach on patient satisfaction and health-related quality-of-life outcome measures warrants further investigation.

Re-Evaluating Stroke Systems of Care: Association of Transfer Status With Thrombectomy Outcomes at an Urban Comprehensive Stroke Center.

Introduction Given the efficacy of mechanical thrombectomies (MT) for large vessel occlusions (LVO), there is concern that the Hub and Spoke model of stroke care, which prioritizes initial assessment of the acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patient at a primary stroke center, would cause a delay in arterial reperfusion, thus leading to worse outcomes. In this study that occurred at our comprehensive stroke center in New York, we compared the clinical outcomes of patients that were either directly admitted for thrombectomy versus those who were transferred from another institution. Methods Retrospective review of the electronic medical record (EMR) was performed on all adult patients treated with endovascular therapy for ischemic stroke between January 2016 and February 2020. A bivariate analysis was performed to compare patients in the direct admit versus transfer group. A multivariable logistic regression model was developed to determine which factors affect 90-day modified Rankin score (mRS) and to evaluate if transfer status was an independent predictor in this model. Results Three hundred and twenty-five patients were included in this study; 127 patients belonged to the direct admit group while 198 were in the transfer group. Thirteen patients (20%) in the direct admit group had a 90-day mRS score of 0-2 and so did 29 patients (25.2%) in the transfer group; thus, no statistically significant difference found in clinical outcomes between both groups (p-value = 0.427). In a multivariable logistic regression model that accounts for age, gender, smoking status, baseline mRS, presenting National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS), procedure duration, thrombolysis in cerebral infarction (TICI) score, post-NIHSS and decompressive hemicraniectomy, transfer status was not found to be predictive of clinical outcomes (OR 0.727 95% CI 0.349-1.516; p-value = 0.396).  Conclusion Transfer status is not significantly associated with 90-day outcome. Since Hub and Spoke is not associated with worse outcomes compared to direct admit, it remains a viable model for providing effective care to stroke patients in an urban setting.

Comparison of three predictive scoring systems for morbidity in oncological spine surgery.

Estimating complications in oncological spine surgery is challenging. The objective of this study was to compare the accuracy of three scoring systems for predicting perioperative morbidity after surgery for spinal metastases. One-hundred and five patients who underwent surgery between 2013 and 2019 were included in this study. All patients had scores retrospectively calculated using the New England Spinal Metastasis Score (NESMS), Metastatic Spinal Tumor Frailty Index (MSTFI), and Anzuategui scoring systems. The main outcome measure was development of a medical complication (minor or major) within 30 days of surgery. The predictive ability for each system was assessed using receiver operating characteristic analysis and calculations of the area under the curve (AUC). The average age for all patients was 61 years and 61/105 patients (58.1%) were male. The most common primary tumor origins were hematologic (23.8%), prostate (16.2%), breast (14.3%), and lung (13.3%). The overall 30-day complication rate was 36.2% and the rate of major complications was 21.9%. Among all patients who underwent oncological spine surgery, the NESMS score had the highest AUC for 30-day overall (AUC 0.64; 95% CI, 0.53 - 0.75) and major morbidity (AUC 0.68; 95% CI, 0.54- 0.81) in our population. However, the accuracy did not meet the threshold for clinical utility. Future prospective validation of these systems in other populations is encouraged.