Revascularization Strategies for Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease in the Elderly Population.

BACKGROUND: Prospective trials comparing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for the treatment of multivessel coronary disease (MVCAD) have included mostly younger patients. We compared treatment strategies in the elderly population. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a propensity-score-matched comparison of patients ≥75 y who underwent isolated CABG or PCI for MVCAD between 2011 and 2018, excluding those with prior cardiac surgery and/or significant left main disease. The primary outcome was 5-year Kaplan Meier survival, and secondary outcomes included readmissions and major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE). RESULTS: Propensity-matching yielded 536 patients (266 PCI and 266 CABG). Rates of complete revascularization of all stenotic lesions were higher in the CABG arm (86.8% versus 21.8%; P < 0.001). Thirty-d mortality was similar between cohorts, though PCI recipients had shorter hospital stay and greater likelihood of discharge to home. Unadjusted one- (89.1% versus 88.4%) and 5-year (73.8% versus 60.1%) survival were both higher in patients who underwent CABG (P = 0.0332). Patients undergoing CABG had reduced, but nonsignificant cumulative incidence of all-cause hospital readmission and MACCE at 5 y. Subgroup analysis of patients 80 y or older revealed similar late survival benefit with CABG when compared to PCI. Among patients undergoing CABG, there did not appear to be any 5-year benefits from multi-arterial grafting. CONCLUSIONS: Despite longer hospitalization and higher rate of nonhome discharge, CABG was associated with improved late survival over PCI in the elderly population. Cardiac surgeons should be included in the multidisciplinary evaluation of older patients with MVCAD.

Long-term outcomes of patients undergoing mechanical versus bioprosthetic aortic root replacement.

BACKGROUND: We evaluated the impact of valve type (mechanical vs. bioprosthetic) on survival after aortic root replacement (ARR). METHODS: In a propensity-matched analysis, we evaluated consecutive operations from 2010 to 2018. Patients were identified using a prospectively maintained institutional database. Patients with infective endocarditis were excluded. Kaplan-Meier survival estimation and multivariable Cox regression analysis were performed. Cox regression adjusted for age, sex, baseline comorbidities, and operative variables. Propensity score matching yielded 153 pairs of patients. RESULTS: A total of 893 patients were identified. We excluded 192 patients with endocarditis and evaluated 701 patients. Of these patients, 455 (64.9%) received a bioprosthetic valve, 246 (35.1%) received a mechanical valve. Median follow-up was 4.06 years. The proportion of aortic dissections and circulatory arrest as well as cardiopulmonary bypass and ischemic times were similar across groups (p = .207, p = .086, p = .668, p = .454, respectively). Operative mortality was significantly higher in the bioprosthetic valve group (7.9% vs. 2.4%, p = .004). Total length of hospital stay was longer (11.4 ± 11.0 vs. 9.5 ± 10.1, p < .001) and there was a higher proportion of prolonged postoperative ventilation >24 h (21.3% vs. 13.0%, p = .007) in the bioprosthetic group. Postoperative outcomes were similar, regarding stroke (p = .077), re-exploration for bleeding (p = .211), new dialysis requirement (p = .077), long-term bleeding complications (p = .561), and reoperations (p = .755). Mechanical valve replacement was associated with improved long-term survival (adjusted HR 0.42, 95% CI: 0.23-0.77, p = .005). CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that mechanical valves for ARRs may confer a survival benefit over bioprosthetic valves. Surgeon bias was likely to account for this survival advantage.

Sex-based outcomes after surgery for acute type A aortic dissection.

BACKGROUND: While prior data have suggested worse outcomes in women after acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD) repair when compared to men, results have been inconsistent across studies over time. This study sought to evaluate the impact of sex on short- and long-term outcomes after ATAAD repair. METHODS: This was a retrospective study utilizing an institutional database of ATAAD repairs from 2007 to 2021. Patients were stratified according to sex. Kaplan-Meier survival estimation and multivariable Cox regression were performed. Supplementary analysis using propensity score matching was also performed. RESULTS: Of the 601 patients who underwent ATAAD repair, 361 were males (60.1%) and 240 (39.9%) were females. Females were significantly older, more likely to have hypertension, and more likely to have chronic lung disease. Females were also significantly more likely than males to undergo hemiarch replacement, while males were significantly more likely than females to undergo total arch replacement and frozen elephant trunk. Operative mortality was 9.4% among males and 13.8% among females, though this was not a statistically significant difference (p = .098). Postoperative complications were comparable between groups. Kaplan-Meier survival estimates were similar for men and women, and, on multivariable Cox regression, sex was not significantly associated with long-term survival (hazard ratio: 1.00, 95% confidence interval: 0.73, 1.37, p = .986). Outcomes remained comparable after supplementary propensity score matched analysis. CONCLUSION: ATAAD repair can be performed with comparable short-term and long-term outcomes in both men and women.

The long-term impact of acute renal failure after aortic arch replacement for acute type A aortic dissection.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the long-term impact of developing acute renal failure (ARF) on survival after open aortic arch reconstruction for acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD). METHODS: This was an observational study of consecutive aortic surgeries from 2007 to 2021. Patients with ATAAD were identified via a prospectively maintained institutional database and were stratified by the presence or absence of postoperative ARF (by RIFLE criteria). Kaplan-Meier survival estimation and multivariable Cox regression analysis were performed. RESULTS: A total of 601 patients undergoing open surgery for ATAAD were identified, of which 516 (85.9%) did not develop postoperative ARF, while 85 (14.1%) developed ARF, with a median follow-up time of 4.6 years (1.6, 7.9). Baseline characteristics were similar across each group, except for higher rates of branch vessel malperfusion and lower preoperative ejection fraction in the ARF group. Patients with ARF underwent more total arch replacement and elephant trunk procedures, with longer cardiopulmonary bypass and circulatory arrest times than patients without ARF. ARF was associated with worse short-term outcomes, including increased in-hospital mortality, prolonged mechanical ventilation, higher rates of sepsis, more blood transfusions, and longer length of hospital stay. Unadjusted Kaplan-Meier survival estimates were significantly lower in the ARF group, compared to the group without ARF (p < .001, log-rank test). After multivariable adjustment, the development of postoperative ARF was significantly associated with an increased hazard of death over the study's follow-up time-period (hazard ratio: 2.74, 95% confidence interval: 1.95, 3.86, p < .001). CONCLUSIONS: ARF is a highly morbid postoperative event that may adversely impact long-term survival after aortic surgery.

Cerebral protection using deep hypothermic circulatory arrest versus retrograde cerebral perfusion for aortic hemiarch reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: With evolutions in technique, recent data encourage the use of cerebral perfusion during aortic arch repair. However, a randomized data have demonstrated higher rates of neurologic injury according to MRI lesions using antegrade cerebral perfusion during hemiarch reconstruction. METHODS: This was a retrospective review of two institutional aortic center databases to identify adult patients who underwent aortic hemiarch reconstruction for elective aortic aneurysm or acute type A aortic dissection. Patients were stratified according to cerebral protection method: (1) deep hypothermic circulatory arrest (DHCA) group versus (2) DHCA/retrograde cerebral perfusion (RCP) group. RESULTS: A total of 320 patients and 245 patients underwent hemiarch reconstruction for aortic aneurysm electively and aortic dissection, respectively. In aneurysmal pathology, the DHCA group included 133 patients and the DHCA/RCP group included 187 patients. Operative mortality was 0.8% in the DHCA group and 2.7% in the DHCA/RCP group (p = 0.41). Kaplan-Meier survival estimates revealed comparable 2-year survival (p = 0.14). In dissection, 43 patients and 202 patients were included in the DHCA group and the DHCA/RCP group, respectively. Operative mortality was equivalent between the two groups (11.6% in the DHCA group and 9.4% in the DHCA/RCP group, p = 0.58). Long-term survival was similar at 2 years between the groups (p = 0.06). Multivariable analysis showed cerebral perfusion strategy was not associated with the composite outcome of operative mortality and stroke. CONCLUSIONS: In treating both elective and acute ascending aortic pathologies with hemiarch reconstruction, both DHCA alone or in combination with RCP yield comparable results.

The use of free versus in situ right internal mammary artery in coronary artery bypass grafting.

INTRODUCTION: Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) continues to be the most commonly performed cardiac surgical procedure in the world. The use of multiarterial grafting may confer a long-term survival benefit over the use of vein grafts. However, there is a paucity of data comparing the use of in situ versus free right internal mammary artery (RIMA) in isolated CABG. METHODS: Patients that underwent isolated CABG between 2010 and 2018 where RIMA was used in addition to a left internal mammary artery graft. Patients with prior cardiac surgery or percutaneous coronary intervention were excluded. Propensity matching was used for subanalysis. Mortality and major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) were analyzed with Kaplan-Meier survival curves and Cox multivariable regression. Heart failure-specific readmissions were assessed with cumulative incidence curves with Fine and Gray competing risk regression. RESULTS: A total of 667 patients underwent isolated CABG. Of those, 422 had free RIMA and 245 had in situ RIMA utilized. Mortality was similar between cohorts (p = 0.199) with 5-year mortality rates of 6.6% (free) and 4.1% (in situ). MACCE was similar between cohorts, with 5-year event rates of 33.6% and 33.9% (p = 0.99). RIMA style was not a significant predictor of any outcome. CONCLUSION: There was no difference in long-term mortality, complications, MACCE, or heart failure readmissions when comparing a contemporary cohort of patients undergoing isolated CABG utilizing RIMA as a conduit. These data may allow surgeons to consider using RIMA either as an in situ or a free conduit.

Cardiac surgery in the afternoon is not associated with increased operative morbidity and mortality.

BACKGROUND: Time of day for surgical procedures has been a topic of considerable controversy, with some suggesting that later operating times are associated with worse outcomes. METHODS: All patients who underwent open cardiac surgery from 2011 to 2018 were included. Patients that had ventricular assist devices, heart transplant, transcatheter aortic valves, aortic dissections, and emergent operations were excluded. Primary outcomes included postoperative mortality and survival; secondary outcomes included postoperative complications and readmission. RESULTS: The initial patient population consisted of 7883 patients who underwent index cardiac surgery. Following propensity matching (3:1), there were 2569 patients in the a.m. cohort (7-11 a.m.) and 860 patients in the p.m. cohort (3-11 p.m.). All baseline characteristics were matched to equivalent proportions. Total intensive care unit time following surgery was longer for the a.m. cohort (46.5 vs. 40.0 h; p<.001). Otherwise, there was no significant difference between cohorts including operative mortality (1.83% vs 2.21%; p= .48). On multivariable analysis, p.m. surgery was not significantly associated with 30 days mortality (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.96 [0.60, 1.53]; p= .86] or mortality over the study follow-up (HR: 0.87 [0.73, 1.03]; p= .10]. For propensity-matched cohorts, Kaplan-Meier survival at 30 days (97.9% vs. 97.4%; p= .44), 1 (93.4% vs 93.9%; p= .51), and 5 years (80.9% vs. 80.2%; p= .84) was not significantly different between cohorts. CONCLUSION: Short- and long-term mortality, hospital readmission, and postoperative complications were not significantly different between patients that underwent cardiac surgery starting in the a.m. versus patients who had cases that started in the afternoon.

10-Year Trends in Aortic Dissection: Mortality and Weekend Effect within the US Nationwide Emergency Department Sample (NEDS).

BACKGROUND: This study examined changes in aortic dissection (AD) mortality from 2006 to 2017 and assessed the impact of weekday versus weekend presentation upon mortality. METHODS: This observational study analyzed all records in the Nationwide Emergency Department Sample (NEDS) database. NEDS aggregates discharge data from 984 hospitals in 36 states and the District of Columbia in the United States of America. All patients with thoracic and thoracoabdominal AD recorded as their principal diagnosis were identified via ICD codes. RESULTS: Patient characteristics (weekday|weekend) count: 26,759|9,640, P = 0.016; age (years): 65.2 ± 15.8|64.7 ± 16.2, P = 0.016; women: 11,318 (42.3%)|4,086 (42.4), P = 0.883; Charlson comorbidity index: 2.3 ± 1.7|2.3 ± 1.6, P = 0.025. There were 36,399 ED visits with diagnosed AD. Annual AD diagnoses increased by 70% from 2006 to 2017. From 2012-2017, patients had lower in-hospital mortality (9.9% versus 11.9%, P < 0.001) compared with 2006-2011. Patients reporting during the weekend had higher in-hospital mortality (11.8% versus 10.4%, P < 0.001) compared with weekdays. On multivariable analysis, year of presentation remained independently associated with in-hospital mortality, with 2012-2017 being associated with reduced mortality (odds ratio (OR) 0.90, 95% CI: 0.82, 0.99, P = 0.031), as compared with 2006-2011. Weekend presentation remained independently associated with worse in-hospital mortality (OR 1.17, 95% CI: 1.05, 1.29, P = 0.003) compared with weekday presentation. CONCLUSION: Although AD mortality is decreasing, the patients presenting on the weekend were 13% more likely to die in the hospital compared with patients presenting during the week.

Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: Closing the Communication Gap Across the Ether Screen.

Cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) has been one of the most important additions to the field of heart surgery in the past century. However, significant morbidity associated with CPB has led to the increasing implementation of off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB). The use of OPCAB has broadened surgical revascularization for patient populations at high risk for undergoing CPB, including the very elderly and patients with impending end-organ failure. Intraoperative hemodynamic instability requires expeditious correction of hypotension with various medical and surgical techniques that require the close attention and skill of both the anesthesia and surgical teams. Technical skill at performing and interpreting transesophageal echocardiography is essential to help differentiate regional wall motion abnormalities from coronary ischemia and external compression from manipulation of the heart, which require different management strategies to resolve hemodynamic collapse. Flawless communication between the anesthesiologist and surgeons, with frequent intraoperative adjustments, is paramount for the completion of successful OPCAB.

Off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery lacks a longitudinal survival advantage in patients with left ventricular dysfunction.

BACKGROUND: This study evaluates the longitudinal impacts of off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB) surgery in patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). METHODS: Adults with LVEF ≤ 30% undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting between 2011 and 2020 were included. Patients were stratified based on the utilization of cardiopulmonary bypass into OPCAB or on-pump coronary artery bypass (ONCAB) groups. Primary outcomes included survival and hospital readmissions. Secondary outcomes evaluated postoperative morbidities. Multivariable regression evaluated risk-adjusted mortality and readmission. Propensity score matching was utilized to reduce bias. RESULTS: A total of 660 low LVEF patients were included, of which 28.5% (n = 188) were OPCAB and 71.5% (n = 472) were ONCAB. The rates of complete revascularization were similar between the groups (80.3% vs 82.0%; P = .67). Early survival between the unmatched groups was similar at 1-year follow-up (86.2% vs 87.9%; P = .53); however, at 5 years OPCABs had significantly worse survival compared with ONCABs (71.5% vs 64.2%; P = .02). These findings persisted in the matched cohort where survival at 1 year was comparable (86.8% vs 85.7%; P = .80), but 5-year survival was better for ONCABs (64.1% vs 69.9%; P = .03). The rates of readmission were similar between the unmatched and matched groups at all time intervals, including readmissions for cardiac-related and heart failure-related events (all, P > .05). CONCLUSIONS: In contemporary patients with reduced LVEF, survival after OPCAB was similar at 1 year but lower at 5-year follow-up compared with ONCAB, despite similar rates of complete revascularization. These findings suggest that there may be other factors influencing longitudinal mortality in the low LVEF cohort, beyond the use of cardiopulmonary bypass.

Outcomes of tissue versus mechanical aortic valve replacement in patients 50 to 70 years of age.

BACKGROUND: Societal guidelines suggest that aortic valve replacement (AVR) in patients age 50 to 70 years can be performed with either bioprosthetic or mechanical valves. This study reviewed outcomes between these valve types among patients aged 50 to 70 years undergoing AVR. METHODS: We examined adult patients 50 to 70 years undergoing isolated AVR with a mechanical or bioprosthetic valve at a single institution between 2010 and 2018. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to evaluate longitudinal survival and multivariable Cox regression analysis was used for risk adjustment. A propensity-matched analysis was performed as well. RESULTS: A total of 723 patients underwent isolated AVR with 467 (64.6%) receiving a bioprosthetic valve. At baseline, patients undergoing bioprosthetic AVR were older (median 65 vs 60 years; P < .001). One-year survival was comparable, however, survival at 5 years was significantly higher among patients undergoing mechanical AVR (95.5% vs 82.6%; P = .010). Among the 196 matched pairs, bioprosthetic AVR was associated with an increased adjusted hazard for death (hazards ratio, 3.29; P < .001). Additionally, 5-year freedom from stroke and bleeding were similar following matching, though mechanical AVR was associated with a greater freedom from repeat valve intervention (97.5% vs 92.9%; P = .020). CONCLUSION: In patients age 50 to 70, mechanical AVR is associated with improved long-term survival and freedom from repeat aortic valve intervention. Further large cohort studies should be performed to explore the potential benefits of mechanical valve replacement in this age range.

Outcomes of mitral valve surgery for severe ischemic mitral regurgitation.

BACKGROUND: This study evaluated outcomes of mitral valve surgery for severe ischemic mitral regurgitation (IMR). METHODS: Patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) with concomitant mitral valve repair (MVr) or replacement (MVR) for severe IMR at a single center between 2010 and 2017 were included. The primary outcome was 5-year survival. Secondary outcomes included operative mortality and morbidity, hospital readmission, recurrence of at least moderate mitral regurgitation (MR), and mitral valve reoperation. RESULTS: A total of 358 patients underwent concomitant mitral valve surgery with CABG for severe IMR (275 MVr and 83 MVR). Unadjusted and risk-adjusted operative mortality was higher in MVR (16% vs 8%; P = .04). MVR patients had higher rates of postoperative renal failure, prolonged ventilation, and deep sternal wound infection. The unadjusted 5-year survival was similar (MVR 64% vs MVr 64%; P = .41), a finding that persisted after risk-adjustment. The 5-year freedom from mitral valve reoperation was 96% and 97% (P = .47). Freedom from at least moderate MR at 1-year and 3-years was 100% vs 86% (P = .09) and 100% vs 68% (P = .06) for MVR and MVr, respectively. However, only three MVr patients developed severe MR by 3 years. Cumulative hazards for all-cause readmission and heart failure-specific readmission were higher with MVR. CONCLUSIONS: Despite a trend towards higher risk of MR recurrence, patients undergoing MVr have similar rates of survival and mitral valve reoperation, with lower rates of readmission at 5-years. This, combined with lower operative mortality rates, makes MVr a reasonable choice particularly in sicker patients with higher operative risk and more limited life expectancy.

Contemporary outcomes of coronary artery bypass grafting in obese patients.

BACKGROUND: This study evaluated the impact of obesity on outcomes of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) with particular attention to cases using bilateral internal mammary arteries (BIMAs). METHODS: Patients undergoing isolated CABG from 2011 to 2017 at a single institution were categorized by body mass index (BMI): 18.5 to 24.9 kg/m2 , 25.0 to 29.9 kg/m2 , 30.0 to 34.9 kg/m2 , and ≥35 kg/m2 , respectively. The primary outcomes were mortality and readmission. Subgroup analysis was performed on CABGs using BIMAs. Adjusted Cox model curves were used for survival analyses and cumulative incidence function for readmissions. RESULTS: A total of 4980 patients underwent CABG with BMIs of 18.5 to 24.9 kg/m2 (17.8%; n = 884), 25.0 to 29.9 kg/m2 (35.0%; n = 1745), 30.0 to 34.9 kg/m2 (27.5%; n = 1368), and ≥35 kg/m2 (19.7%; n = 983), respectively. Patients with BMI 18.5 to 24.9 kg/m2 had a higher overall Society of Thoracic Surgeons predicted risk of mortality. Adjusted survival was similar across BMI groups, and readmission risk was highest in those with a BMI of 18.5 to 24.9 kg/m2 (P = .01). Increasing BMI was associated with higher rates of postoperative deep sternal wound infection (DSWI). CABG was performed with BIMA in 820 (16%). In patients undergoing CABG with BIMA use, there were no differences in survival, readmissions, or DSWI rates between BMI groups. CONCLUSIONS: CABG, including with the use of BIMA, can be performed in obese patients without an increased risk of mortality or hospital readmission out to 5 years. Although rates of postoperative DSWI increase with increasing BMI, this finding did not appear to be magnified in patients with BIMA, although the sample size was limited in this subanalysis. These data support the notion that BIMA use should not be precluded in the obese.

Midterm outcomes of subcoronary stentless porcine valve versus stented aortic valve replacement.

INTRODUCTION: Stentless porcine xenografts are versatile bioprosthetic valves with the advantage of improved hemodynamics that mimic the function of the native aortic valve. However, these bioprostheses are challenging to implant in the subcoronary position. METHODS: All consecutive patients who underwent a bioprosthetic aortic valve replacement (AVR) were included from our institutional database. Cox regression analysis was preformed to determine significant predictors for mid term mortality as well as all cause, cardiac, and heart failure readmission. RESULTS: Patients in the subcoronary stentless group were older and more likely to be female and were likely to have a higher Society of Thoracic Surgery risk of mortality. Survival was superior in the stented AVR cohort at 30-days (96.4% vs 90.5%; P < .001), 1-year (90.5% vs 71.6%; P < .001), and 5-year (74.5% vs 56.9%; P < .001) follow up. Acute kidney injury (16.22% vs 5.22%; P < .001) and blood product transfusion (70.27% vs 44.0%; P < .001) were higher in the stentless group. Multivariable analysis revealed subcoronary stentless implantation as a significant independent risk factor for mortality (hazards ratio: 1.92 [1.35,2.72]; P < .001). CONCLUSION: Stentless porcine xenograft implantation with the Freestyle bioprosthetic in the subcoronary position can be successfully performed in select patients, but its use is associated with increased perioperative morbidity and mortality affecting midterm outcomes. Individual patient selection and surgeon experience are important to ensure favorable outcomes.

Surgical treatment of infective endocarditis: Results in 831 patients from a single center.

INTRODUCTION: This study evaluated surgical outcomes of infective endocarditis (IE), with particular attention to the impact of intravenous drug use (IVDU). METHODS: Adult patients undergoing surgery for IE between 2011 and 2018 at a single center were included and stratified by IVDU. The primary outcome was overall survival. Secondary outcomes included postoperative complications and hospital readmissions. Kaplan-Meier and multivariable Cox regression were utilized for unadjusted and risk-adjusted survival analyses, respectively. Cumulative incidence function curves were compared for hospital readmissions. RESULTS: A total of 831 patients (mean age 55 years, 34.4% female) were operated on for IE, including 318 (38.3%) with IVDU. Cultures were most commonly positive for streptococcus (25.2%), methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus (17.7%), enterococcus (14.3%), or methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (8.4%). The most common procedures included isolated aortic valve repair/replacement (18.8%), aortic root replacement (15.9%), mitral valve repair/replacement (26.7%), aortic and mitral valve replacement (8.4%), and tricuspid valve repair/replacement (7.6%). Mean follow-up was 3.4 ± 2.4 years. Overall 5-year survival was 64% and was similar between IVDU and non-IVDU. Multivariable analysis demonstrated that IVDU was not associated with mortality risk. IVDU patients displayed higher rates of all-cause readmission (61.6% vs 53.9%; P = .03), drug-use readmission (15.4% vs 1.4%; P < .001), and recurrent endocarditis readmission (33.0% vs 13.0%; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: The majority of patients undergoing surgical treatment of IE are alive at 5-years although readmission rates are high. IVDU is not a risk factor for longitudinal mortality although patients with IVDU are at higher overall readmission risk, driven largely by greater readmissions for drug-use and recurrent endocarditis.

The long-term impact of peripheral cannulation for redo cardiac surgery.

BACKGROUND: Redo cardiac surgery carries an inherent risk for adverse short-term outcomes and worse long-term survival. Strategies to mitigate these risks have been numerous, including initiation of cardiopulmonary bypass via peripheral cannulation before resternotomy. This study evaluated the impact of central versus peripheral cannulation on long-term survival after redo cardiac surgery. METHODS: This was an observational study of open cardiac surgeries between 2010 and 2018. Patients undergoing open cardiac surgery that utilized cardiopulmonary bypass, who also had more than equal to 1 prior cardiac surgery, were identified. Kaplan-Meier survival estimation and multivariable Cox regression analysis were performed to assess the impact of peripheral cannulation on survival. To isolate long-term survival, patients with operative mortality were excluded and survival time was counted from the date of discharge until the date of death. RESULTS: Of the 1660 patients with more than equal to 1 prior cardiac surgery, 91 (5.5%) received peripheral cannulation. After excluding patients with operative mortality and after multivariable risk-adjustment, the peripheral cannulation group had significantly increased hazard of death, as compared to the central cannulation group (HR 1.53, 95% CI: 1.01, 2.30, P = .044). Yet, there were no relevant differences for other postoperative outcomes, including blood product requirement, prolonged ventilation (>24 hours), pneumonia, reoperation for bleeding, stroke, sepsis, and new dialysis requirement. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study reporting the long-term impact of peripheral cannulation for redo cardiac surgery after excluding patients with operative mortality. These data suggest that central cannulation may to be the preferred approach to redo cardiac surgery whenever safe and possible.

Open Surgical Access for Transfemoral TAVR Should Not Be a Contraindication for Conscious Sedation.

OBJECTIVES: The use of monitored anesthesia care (MAC) for transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is gaining favor in the United States, although general anesthesia (GA) continues to be common for these procedures. Open surgical cutdown for transfemoral TAVR has been a relative contraindication for TAVR with MAC at most centers. The objective of this study was to review the authors' results of transfemoral TAVR performed in patients with open surgical cutdown with the use of MAC. DESIGN: Retrospective study design from a prospectively recorded database. SETTING: Tertiary academic (teaching) hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Two hundred eighty-two patients undergoing transfemoral TAVR with open surgical cutdown under MAC from 2015 to 2017. INTERVENTIONS: Transfemoral TAVR under MAC with surgical cutdown for femoral vascular access. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The study cohort consisted of 282 patients with severe aortic stenosis (mean area 0.65 [± 0.16] cm2, mean gradient of 48.9 [±13.3] mmHg, and mean age of 82.7 [± 7.31] years). Eleven (3.9%) patients required conversion to GA. First postoperative pain score (0-10) was 2.9 and highest postoperative pain score was 4.6. Major and minor vascular complications occurred in 2 (0.7%) and 6 (2.1%) patients, respectively. Twenty-nine (10.3%) patients were readmitted within 30 days, and 6 (2.1%) patients had in-hospital mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Open surgical cutdown for transfemoral TAVR can be performed safely using MAC and ilioinguinal block with low rates of conversion to general anesthesia and acceptable postoperative outcomes and pain scores.

Longitudinal outcomes of dialysis-dependent patients undergoing isolated coronary artery bypass grafting.

BACKGROUND: Dialysis-dependent patients have a higher risk of short-term morbidity and mortality following cardiac surgery. However, longitudinal survival and readmissions in this patient population after isolated coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) are lacking in the literature. METHODS: All patients undergoing isolated CABG from 2011 to 2017 were included. Perioperative data were retrospectively extracted from a prospectively maintained cardiac surgical database with a primary focus on longitudinal mortality and readmissions. RESULTS: The total study population consisted of 6874 nondialysis-dependent patients and 174 patients with dialysis dependence. Patients in the dialysis-dependent group presented a higher risk of morbidity and mortality as reflected in the Society of Thoracic Surgeons-Predicted Risk of Morbidity and Mortality (STS-PROM) (8.4% ± 9.7% vs 2.3% ± 3.9%; P < 0.001). Operative (30-day) mortality was significantly higher in the dialysis group (8.6% vs 2.3%; P < 0.001). Unadjusted outcomes yielded 30-day (92% vs 98%; P < 0.001), 1-year (80% vs 94%; P < 0.001), and 5-year (38% vs 84%; P < 0.001) survival that was significantly worse for the dialysis group. Freedom from readmission at 30 days (93% vs 87%; P = 0.005), 1 year (78% vs 56%; P < 0.001), and 5 years (62% vs 39%; P < 0.001) was significantly better for the nondialysis cohort. Dialysis dependence was an independent predictor of mortality at 30 days (hazard ratio [HR], 3.86; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.96, 5.03; P < 0.001), 1 year (HR, 3.20; 95% CI, 2.14, 2.79; P < 0.001), and 5 years (HR, 4.02; 95% CI, 3.07, 5.26; P < 0.001) despite risk adjustment. CONCLUSION: Dialysis-dependent patients have significantly elevated operative risk, which translates to worse short- and long-term survival following isolated CABG. The need for dialysis alone is an independent predictor of both mortality and readmission in the midterm.

Predictors of increased costs following index adult cardiac operations: Insights from a statewide publicly reported registry.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to identify hospital-level predictors of increased cost following index adult cardiac operations in a statewide registry. METHODS: The Pennsylvania Health Care Cost Containment Council (PHC4) database was queried for isolated coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), isolated valve surgery, or CABG plus valve surgery performed between 2014 and 2016. Charge-to-cost ratios for each individual hospital were used to estimate cost. Expected (predicted) operative mortality and 30-day readmission were evaluated using multivariable risk models and linear regression analysis was utilized to evaluate the risk-adjusted impact of multiple hospital-level characteristics on costs. RESULTS: During the study period, 29 578 patients underwent isolated CABG (n = 16,641), isolated valve surgery (n = 8618), or CABG plus valve surgery (n = 4319) at 60 hospitals. The median cost of CABG was $61 573 (interquartile range [IQR] $50 780 to $77 482). The median cost of isolated valve surgery was $68,835 (IQR $56 039 to $89 465) and CABG plus valve surgery $83 574 (IQR $69 806 to $114 407). Hospital-level predictors of increasing costs in isolated CABG included higher predicted mortality rates, higher observed-to-expected (OE) mortality ratios, and nonteaching status. No hospital-level independent predictors of increased costs were identified for isolated valve or CABG plus valve surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Hospitals that performed higher risk cases and had higher OE ratios for operative mortality in isolated CABG were found to have increased costs. These data collectively suggest that attention to risk assessment and outcome optimization efforts in isolated CABG would likely result in programmatic advantages not only from a clinical standpoint but also economic.

Clinical outcomes and hospital readmission rates in mechanical vs bioprosthetic mitral valves.

OBJECTIVE: Recent national trends have demonstrated increased use of bioprosthetic mitral valves. The primary objective of this study was to compare clinical outcomes as well as readmission rates for mechanical vs bioprosthetic mitral valve replacement (mMVR vs bMVR). METHODS: All patients undergoing MVR from 2011-2017 were included in a single center data set that was obtained retrospectively from a prospectively maintained cardiac surgical database. RESULTS: The total MVR patient cohort consisted of 828 patients, including bMVR (n = 522) and mMVR (n = 306). There was no significant difference in the operative (30-day) mortality between bMVR and mMVR (8.6% vs 6.5%; P = .31). The unadjusted estimated 1-year mortality was significantly higher for the bMVR group (19.8% vs 13.7%, P = .04) and this trend continued for the estimated 5-year mortality (35.1% vs 18.7%; P = .001). Valve prosthesis choice (bMVR vs mMVR) did not have a risk-adjusted impact on operative mortality at 30 days (P = .58); however 1-year (P = .05) and 5-year (P = .05) mortality remained significantly higher for the bMVR group. Propensity matching revealed a higher mortality rate on follow-up in the bMVR (26.7% vs 18.2%, P = .03) but no difference at 30 days or 1 year. There was no difference in hospital readmissions over 5 years CONCLUSIONS: Mechanical prostheses may confer a survival benefit in patients undergoing MVR. With emphasis on patient education and anticoagulation compliance, mMVR remains an efficacious option.