Dual Oxygenation in the Treatment of Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: At the beginning of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, many patients presented with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure, requiring ventilatory support. One treatment method was the addition of a reservoir mask to a high flow nasal cannula (HFNC) (dual oxygenation). OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the clinical outcomes of combining reservoir mask on top of a high-flow nasal cannula. METHODS: A retrospective cohort of adult patients who were admitted due to COVID-19 during the first year of the pandemic to Rambam Health Care Campus. The primary endpoint was 30-day mortality. Secondary endpoints were incidence of invasive positive pressure ventilation initiation and admission to the intensive care unit (ICU). Patients who received positive pressure ventilation for reasons other than hypoxemic respiratory failure or who were transferred to another facility while still on HFNC were excluded. RESULTS: The final analysis included 333 patients; 166 were treated with dual oxygenation and 167 with HFNC only (controls). No significant differences in baseline characteristics were noted between the groups. The dual oxygenation group was slightly older (69.2 ± 14.8 years vs. 65.6 ± 15.5 years, P = 0.034). The 30-day mortality (24.1% vs. 36.5%, P = 0.013), rates of invasive positive pressure ventilation (47% vs. 59.3%, P = 0.024), and ICU admissions (41.6% vs. 52.7%, P = 0.042) were all significantly lower in the dual oxygenation group. CONCLUSIONS: The addition of reservoir masks to HFNC may improve the oxygenation and overall prognosis in patients with severe hypoxemia due to COVID-19.

BNT162b2 mRNA Vaccine Effectiveness Given Confirmed Exposure: Analysis of Household Members of Coronavirus Disease 2019 Patients.

BACKGROUND: Although BNT162b2 vaccine-efficacy analyses have been published, the effectiveness of the vaccine in preventing coronavirus disease 2019 given confirmed exposure has not been previously demonstrated, even though it has policy implications, such as the need for self-quarantine when exposure has occurred. METHODS: In a retrospective cohort study, we used data collected between 20 December 2020 and 17 March 2021 from the second largest healthcare provider in Israel to analyze the probability of an additional household infection occurring within 10 days after an index infection. In model 1, vaccine effectiveness was described for Fully Vaccinated individuals (7 or more days from second dose) vs either Unvaccinated individuals or those Recently Vaccinated Once (0-7 days from the first dose, presumably still unprotected). Secondary analyses included correction for differing testing rates. In model 2, we conducted a separate analysis of households comprised of only adults with the same vaccination status. RESULTS: A total of 173 569 households were included, of which 6351 had an index infection (mean [standard deviation] age, 58.9 [13.5] years); 50% were women. Adjusted vaccine effectiveness of Fully Vaccinated compared with Unvaccinated participants was 80.3% (95% confidence interval [CI], 73.5-85.4) and 82.0% (95% CI, 75.6-86.8) compared with those Recently Vaccinated Once. CONCLUSIONS: The BNT162b2 vaccine is effective in high-risk real-life exposure scenarios, but the protection afforded in these settings is lower than that previously described. Individuals with a confirmed significant exposure to severe acute respiratory syndrome are still at risk of being infected even if fully vaccinated.

COVID-19 in Patients with Hematologic Malignancies: Clinical Manifestations, Persistence, and Immune Response.

BACKGROUND: The clinical presentation of coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19) is the result of intricate interactions between the novel coronavirus and the immune system. In patients with hematologic malignancies (HM), these interactions dramatically change the clinical course and outcomes of COVID-19. SUMMARY: Patients with HM and COVID-19 are at an increased risk for prolonged viral shedding, more protracted and severe presentation, and death, even when compared to other immunocompromised hosts. HM (e.g., multiple myeloma, chronic lymphocytic leukemia) and anticancer treatments (e.g., anti-CD20 agents) that impair humoral immunity markedly increase the risk of severe COVID-19 as well as protracted viral shedding and possibly longer infectivity. Cytokine release syndrome (CRS) is an important player in the pathophysiology of severe and fatal COVID-19. Treatments targeting specific cytokines involved in CRS such as interleukin-6 and Janus kinase have proven beneficial in COVID-19 patients but were not assessed specifically in HM patients. Although neutropenia (as well as neutrophilia) was associated with increased COVID-19 mortality, granulocyte colony-stimulating factors were not beneficial in patients with COVID-19 and may have been associated with worse outcomes. Decreased levels of T lymphocytes and especially decreased CD4+ counts, and depletion of CD8+ lymphocytes, are a hallmark of severe COVID-19, and even more so among patients with HM, underlying the important role of T-helper dysfunction in severe COVID-19. In HM patients with intact cellular immunity, robust T-cell responses may compensate for an impaired humoral immune system. Further prospective studies are needed to evaluate the mechanisms of severe COVID-19 among patients with HM and assess the efficacy of new immunomodulating COVID-19 treatments in this population. KEY MESSAGES: Understanding the immunopathology of COVID-19 has greatly benefited from the previous research in patients with HM. So far, no COVID-19 treatments were properly evaluated in patients with HM. Patients with HM should be included in future RCTs assessing treatments for COVID-19.

The association between the degree of fever as measured in the emergency department and clinical outcomes of hospitalized adult patients.

BACKGROUND: Fever is a physiologic response to a wide range of pathologies and one of the most common complaints and clinical signs in the emergency medicine department (ED). The association between fever magnitude and clinical outcomes has been evaluated in specific populations with inconsistent results. OBJECTIVES: In this study we aimed to investigate the association between the degree of fever in the ED and clinical outcomes of hospitalized febrile adult patients. METHODS: This was a retrospective single-center cohort study of all the patients with maximal body temperature (BT) ≥ 38.0 °C, as recorded during the ED evaluation, who were hospitalized between January 2015 and December 2020. Patients with heatstroke were excluded. The primary outcome was 30-day all-cause mortality and secondary outcomes were intensive care unit (ICU) admission and development of acute kidney injury (AKI). RESULTS: Fever was recorded among 8.1% of patients evaluated in the ED. Elevated BT was associated with increased risk of hospital admission (70.3% vs. 49.4%, p < 0.001), 30-day mortality (12.3% vs. 2.6%, p < 0.001), ICU admission (5.7% vs. 2.8%, p < 0.001), and AKI 11.7% vs. 3.8%, p < 0.001). After exclusion of nine patients with heatstroke, 21,252 hospitalized febrile patients were included in the final analysis. BT > 39.7 °C was progressively associated with increased mortality (OR 1.64-2.22, 95% CI 1.16-2.81, p < 0.005) as compared to BT 38.0-38.1 °C. More AKI events were observed in patients with BT > 39.5 °C (OR 1.48-2.91, 95% CI 1.11-3.66, p < 0.007). Temperature between 39.2 and 39.5 °C was associated with lower mortality (OR 0.62-0.71, 95% CI 0.51-0.87, p < 0.001). In a multiple logistic regression analysis BT > 39.9 °C was independently associated with increased mortality and AKI. BT > 39.7 °C was progressively associated with an increased risk of ICU admission. CONCLUSION: Among febrile patients admitted to the hospital, BT > 39.5 °C was associated with adverse clinical course, as compared to patients with lower-grade fever (38.0-38.1 °C). These patients should be flagged on arrival to the ED and likely warrant more aggressive evaluation and treatment.

SARS-CoV-2 spike IgG titres up to 137 days following Comirnaty mRNA COVID-19 vaccination, Israel, February to May 2021.

BackgroundData regarding the long-term protection afforded by vaccination for the SARS-CoV-2 infection are essential for allocation of scarce vaccination resources worldwide.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective cohort study aimed at studying the kinetics of IgG antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 in COVID-19-naïve patients fully vaccinated with two doses of Comirnaty mRNA COVID-19 vaccine. Geometric mean concentrations (GMCs) of antibody levels were reported. Linear models were used to assess antibody levels after full vaccination and their decline over time.ResultsThe study included 4,740 patients and 5,719 serological tests. Unadjusted GMCs peaked 28-41 days after the first dose at 10,174 AU/mL (95% CI: 9,211-11,237) and gradually decreased but remained well above the positivity cut-off. After adjusting for baseline characteristics and repeated measurements, the antibodies half-life time was 34.1 days (95% CI: 33.1-35.2), and females aged 16-39 years with no comorbidities had antibody levels of 20,613 AU/mL (95% CI: 18,526-22,934) on day 28 post-first-dose. Antibody levels were lower among males (0.736 of the level measured in females; 95% CI: 0.672-0.806), people aged 40-59 (0.729; 95% CI: 0.649-0.818) and ≥ 60 years (0.452; 95% CI: 0.398-0.513), and patients having haematological (0.241; 95% CI: 0.190-0.306) or solid malignancies (0.757; 95% CI: 0.650-0.881), chronic kidney disease with glomerular filtration rate (GFR) ≥ 30 (0.434; 95% CI: 0.354-0.532) or with GFR < 30 mL/min (0.176; 95% CI: 0.109-0.287), and immunosuppression (0.273; 95% CI: 0.235-0.317). Body mass index, cardiovascular disease, congestive heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, diabetes and inflammatory bowel diseases were not associated with antibody levels.ConclusionsVaccination with two doses resulted in persistently high levels of antibodies (≥ cut-off of 50 AU/mL) up to 137 days post-first-dose. Risk factors for lower antibody levels were identified.

Community-acquired versus nosocomial Legionella pneumonia: factors associated with Legionella-related mortality.

Over the past decade, changes in the diagnosis and management of Legionella pneumonia occurred and risk factors for severe infection and increased mortality were identified. Previous reports found that nosocomial infection is associated with higher mortality while others showed no differences. We aimed to evaluate the differences in the clinical course and mortality rates between hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP) and community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) caused by Legionella pneumophila. A retrospective cohort study of patients admitted due to Legionella pneumonia between January 2012 through November 2019 was conducted in a tertiary referral center (Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel). The primary outcome was 30-day Legionella pneumonia-related mortality. A multivariable logistic regression was performed to determine whether a nosocomial infection is an independent predictor of mortality. One hundred nine patients were included. Seventy (64.2%) had CAP and 39 (35.8%) had HAP. The groups were comparable regarding age, gender, and comorbidities. Time to diagnosis was longer and the number of patients receiving initial empiric anti-Legionella spp. treatment was smaller in the HAP group (8 days [IQR 5.5-12.5] vs. 5 days [IQR 3-8], p < 0.001 and 65.5% vs. 78.6%, p = 0.003, respectively). Patients with HAP had higher 30-day mortality, 41% vs. 18.6%, p = 0.02. In a multivariable logistic regression model, only pneumonia severity index and nosocomial source were independently associated with increased mortality. HAP caused by Legionella spp. is independently associated with increased mortality when compared to CAP caused by the same pathogen. The possible reasons for this increased mortality include late diagnosis and delayed initiation of appropriate treatment.

Association between ionised calcium and severity of postpartum haemorrhage: a retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Postpartum haemorrhage (PPH) is often complicated by impaired coagulation. We aimed to determine whether the level of ionised calcium (Ca2+), an essential coagulation co-factor, at diagnosis of PPH is associated with bleeding severity. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of women diagnosed with PPH during vaginal delivery between January 2009 and April 2020. Ca2+ levels at PPH diagnosis were compared between women who progressed to severe PPH (primary outcome) and those with less severe bleeding. Severe PPH was defined by transfusion of ≥2 blood units, arterial embolisation or emergency surgery, admission to ICU, or death. Associations between other variables (e.g. fibrinogen concentration) and bleeding severity were also assessed. RESULTS: For 436 patients included in the analysis, hypocalcaemia was more common among patients with severe PPH (51.5% vs 10.6%, P<0.001). In a multivariable logistic regression model, Ca2+ and fibrinogen were the only parameters independently associated with PPH severity with odds ratios of 1.14 for each 10 mg dl-1 decrease in fibrinogen (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.05-1.24; P=0.002) and 1.97 for each 0.1 mmol L-1 decrease in Ca2+ (95% CI, 1.25-3.1; P=0.003). The performance of Ca2+ or fibrinogen was not significantly different (area under the curve [AUC]=0.79 [95% CI, 0.75-0.83] vs AUC=0.86 [95% CI, 0.82-0.9]; P=0.09). The addition of Ca2+ to fibrinogen improved the model, leading to AUC of 0.9 (95% CI, 0.86-0.93), P=0.03. CONCLUSIONS: Ca2+ level at the time of diagnosis of PPH was associated with risk of severe bleeding. Ca2+ monitoring may facilitate identification and treatment of high-risk patients.

Association Between Ionized Calcium Level and Neurological Outcome in Endovascularly Treated Patients with Spontaneous Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: Spontaneous subarachnoid hemorrhage (SSAH) is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Pathophysiological processes following initial bleeding are complex and not fully understood. In this study, we aimed to determine whether a low level of ionized calcium (Ca++), an essential cofactor in the coagulation cascade and other cellular processes, is associated with adverse neurological outcome, development of early hydrocephalus, and symptomatic vasospasm among patients with SSAH. METHODS: This was a retrospective single-center cohort study of all patients admitted for SSAH between January 1, 2009, and April 31, 2020. The primary outcome was an unfavorable neurological status at discharge, defined as a modified Rankin Scale score greater than or equal to 3. Secondary outcomes were the development of early hydrocephalus and symptomatic vasospasm. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to determine whether Ca++ was an independent predictor of these outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 255 patients were included in the final analysis. Hypocalcemia, older age, admission Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score, and admission Hunt-Hess classification scale (H&H) grades IV and V were independently associated with unfavorable neurological outcome, with adjusted odds ratios (ORs) of 1.93 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.1-3.4; p = 0.02) for each 0.1 mmol L-1 decrease in the Ca++ level, 1.04 (95% CI 1.01-1.08; p = 0.02) for each year increase, 0.82 (95% CI 0.68-0.99; p = 0.04), and 6.29 (95% CI 1.14-34.6; p = 0.03), respectively. Risk factors for the development of hydrocephalus were hypocalcemia and GCS score, with ORs of 1.85 (95% CI 1.26-2.71; p = 0.002) for each 0.1 mmol L-1 decrease in the Ca++ level and 0.83 (95% CI 0.73-0.94; p = 0.005), respectively. Ca++ was not associated with symptomatic vasospasm (OR 1.04 [95% CI 0.76-1.41]; p = 0.81). Among patients with admission H&H grade I-III bleeding, hypocalcemia was independently associated with unfavorable neurological outcome at discharge, with an adjusted OR of 1.99 (95% CI 1.03-3.84; p = 0.04) for each 0.1 mmol L-1 decrease in the Ca++ level. Hypocalcemia was also an independent risk factor for the development of early hydrocephalus, with an adjusted OR of 2.95 (95% CI 1.49-5.84; p = 0.002) for each 0.1 mmol L-1 decrease in the Ca++ level. Ca++ was not associated with symptomatic vasospasm. No association was found between Ca++ and predefined outcomes among patients with admission H&H grade IV and V bleeding. CONCLUSIONS: Our study shows that hypocalcemia is associated with worse neurological outcome at discharge and development of early hydrocephalus in endovascularly treated patients with SSAH. Potential mechanisms include calcium-induced coagulopathy and higher blood pressure. Trials are needed to assess whether correction of hypocalcemia will lead to improved outcomes.

[ON THE EQUATOR].

INTRODUCTION: Elective clerkships in low income countries have been an integral part of the curriculum in the majority of medical schools worldwide. These programs expose students to global challenges, to a diversity of cultures and healthcare systems, and have been shown to improve medical knowledge, as well as clinical and communication skills. In 2018 and 2019, the Faculty of Medicine at the Technion, in cooperation with the Department for Infectious Diseases in the Rambam Health Care campus and the "Brit Olam" nonprofit organization, offered a clinical clerkship in Kiboga hospital, Uganda. The elective took place in a public governmental hospital located in one of the poorest districts of Uganda. During a three-week period, the students accompanied by Israeli and Uganda tutors, participated in clinical rounds and other clinical activities in various departments of the hospital. This manuscript, describes the students' experiences in Kiboga. During the short elective, students had a unique opportunity to observe a different culture, immerse in a completely different healthcare system, learn about how a detailed medical history and a thorough physical examination can lead to diagnosis (without extensive diagnostic tests), and closely observe ethical challenges and difficult clinical decisions. The elective helped students develop personally and professionally and solidify their commitment to medicine. Currently, in Israeli medical schools, there are a few programs which expose students to medicine in low-resource countries. We believe that expanding the understanding of Global Health through courses and overseas opportunities in long-term partnerships, can improve the students' medical education.

Treatment Outcomes of Colistin- and Carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii Infections: An Exploratory Subgroup Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial.

BACKGROUND: We evaluated the association between mortality and colistin resistance in Acinetobacter baumannii infections and the interaction with antibiotic therapy. METHODS: This is a secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial of patients with carbapenem-resistant gram-negative bacterial infections treated with colistin or colistin-meropenem combination. We evaluated patients with infection caused by carbapenem-resistant A. baumannii (CRAB) identified as colistin susceptible (CoS) at the time of treatment and compared patients in which the isolate was confirmed as CoS with those whose isolates were retrospectively identified as colistin resistant (CoR) when tested by broth microdilution (BMD). The primary outcome was 28-day mortality. RESULTS: Data were available for 266 patients (214 CoS and 52 CoR isolates). Patients with CoR isolates had higher baseline functional capacity and lower rates of mechanical ventilation than patients with CoS isolates. All-cause 28-day mortality was 42.3% (22/52) among patients with CoR strains and 52.8% (113/214) among patients with CoS isolates (P = .174). After adjusting for variables associated with mortality, the mortality rate was lower among patients with CoR isolates (odds ratio [OR], 0.285 [95% confidence interval {CI}, .118-.686]). This difference was associated with treatment arm: Mortality rates among patients with CoR isolates were higher in those randomized to colistin-meropenem combination therapy compared to colistin monotherapy (OR, 3.065 [95% CI, 1.021-9.202]). CONCLUSIONS: Colistin resistance determined by BMD was associated with lower mortality among patients with severe CRAB infections. Among patients with CoR isolates, colistin monotherapy was associated with a better outcome compared to colistin-meropenem combination therapy. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: NCT01732250.

Seven Versus 14 Days of Antibiotic Therapy for Uncomplicated Gram-negative Bacteremia: A Noninferiority Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: Gram-negative bacteremia is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in hospitalized patients. Data to guide the duration of antibiotic therapy are limited. METHODS: This was a randomized, multicenter, open-label, noninferiority trial. Inpatients with gram-negative bacteremia, who were afebrile and hemodynamically stable for at least 48 hours, were randomized to receive 7 days (intervention) or 14 days (control) of covering antibiotic therapy. Patients with uncontrolled focus of infection were excluded. The primary outcome at 90 days was a composite of all-cause mortality; relapse, suppurative, or distant complications; and readmission or extended hospitalization (>14 days). The noninferiority margin was set at 10%. RESULTS: We included 604 patients (306 intervention, 298 control) between January 2013 and August 2017 in 3 centers in Israel and Italy. The source of the infection was urinary in 411 of 604 patients (68%); causative pathogens were mainly Enterobacteriaceae (543/604 [90%]). A 7-day difference in the median duration of covering antibiotics was achieved. The primary outcome occurred in 140 of 306 patients (45.8%) in the 7-day group vs 144 of 298 (48.3%) in the 14-day group (risk difference, -2.6% [95% confidence interval, -10.5% to 5.3%]). No significant differences were observed in all other outcomes and adverse events, except for a shorter time to return to baseline functional status in the short-course therapy arm. CONCLUSIONS: In patients hospitalized with gram-negative bacteremia achieving clinical stability before day 7, an antibiotic course of 7 days was noninferior to 14 days. Reducing antibiotic treatment for uncomplicated gram-negative bacteremia to 7 days is an important antibiotic stewardship intervention. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: NCT01737320.

Vaccines for preventing typhoid fever.

BACKGROUND: Typhoid fever and paratyphoid fever continue to be important causes of illness and death, particularly among children and adolescents in south-central and southeast Asia. Two typhoid vaccines are widely available, Ty21a (oral) and Vi polysaccharide (parenteral). Newer typhoid conjugate vaccines are at varying stages of development and use. The World Health Organization has recently recommended a Vi tetanus toxoid (Vi-TT) conjugate vaccine, Typbar-TCV, as the preferred vaccine for all ages. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effects of vaccines for preventing typhoid fever. SEARCH METHODS: In February 2018, we searched the Cochrane Infectious Diseases Group Specialized Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, LILACS, and mRCT. We also searched the reference lists of all included trials. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomized and quasi-randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing typhoid fever vaccines with other typhoid fever vaccines or with an inactive agent (placebo or vaccine for a different disease) in adults and children. Human challenge studies were not eligible. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently applied inclusion criteria and extracted data, and assessed the certainty of the evidence using the GRADE approach. We computed vaccine efficacy per year of follow-up and cumulative three-year efficacy, stratifying for vaccine type and dose. The outcome addressed was typhoid fever, defined as isolation of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhi in blood. We calculated risk ratios (RRs) and efficacy (1 - RR as a percentage) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). MAIN RESULTS: In total, 18 RCTs contributed to the quantitative analysis in this review: 13 evaluated efficacy (Ty21a: 5 trials; Vi polysaccharide: 6 trials; Vi-rEPA: 1 trial; Vi-TT: 1 trial), and 9 reported on adverse events. All trials but one took place in typhoid-endemic countries. There was no information on vaccination in adults aged over 55 years of age, pregnant women, or travellers. Only one trial included data on children under two years of age.Ty21a vaccine (oral vaccine, three doses)A three-dose schedule of Ty21a vaccine probably prevents around half of typhoid cases during the first three years after vaccination (cumulative efficacy 2.5 to 3 years: 50%, 95% CI 35% to 61%, 4 trials, 235,239 participants, moderate-certainty evidence). These data include patients aged 3 to 44 years.Compared with placebo, this vaccine probably does not cause more vomiting, diarrhoea, nausea or abdominal pain (2 trials, 2066 participants; moderate-certainty evidence), headache, or rash (1 trial, 1190 participants; moderate-certainty evidence); however, fever (2 trials, 2066 participants; moderate-certainty evidence) is probably more common following vaccination.Vi polysaccharide vaccine (injection, one dose)A single dose of Vi polysaccharide vaccine prevents around two-thirds of typhoid cases in the first year after vaccination (year 1: 69%, 95% CI 63% to 74%; 3 trials, 99,979 participants; high-certainty evidence). In year 2, trial results were more variable, with the vaccine probably preventing between 45% and 69% of typhoid cases (year 2: 59%, 95% CI 45% to 69%; 4 trials, 194,969 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). These data included participants aged 2 to 55 years of age.The three-year cumulative efficacy of the vaccine may be around 55% (95% CI 30% to 70%; 11,384 participants, 1 trial; low-certainty evidence). These data came from a single trial conducted in South Africa in the 1980s in participants aged 5 to 15 years.Compared with placebo, this vaccine probably did not increase the incidence of fever (3 trials, 132,261 participants; moderate-certainty evidence) or erythema (3 trials, 132,261 participants; low-certainty evidence); however, swelling (3 trials, 1767 participants; moderate-certainty evidence) and pain at the injection site (1 trial, 667 participants; moderate-certainty evidence) were more common in the vaccine group.Vi-rEPA vaccine (two doses)Administration of two doses of the Vi-rEPA vaccine probably prevents between 50% and 96% of typhoid cases during the first two years after vaccination (year 1: 94%, 95% CI 75% to 99%; year 2: 87%, 95% CI 56% to 96%, 1 trial, 12,008 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). These data came from a single trial with children two to five years of age conducted in Vietnam.Compared with placebo, both the first and the second dose of this vaccine increased the risk of fever (1 trial, 12,008 and 11,091 participants, low-certainty evidence) and the second dose increase the incidence of swelling at the injection site (one trial, 11,091 participants, moderate-certainty evidence).Vi-TT vaccine (two doses)We are uncertain of the efficacy of administration of two doses of Vi-TT (PedaTyph) in typhoid cases in children during the first year after vaccination (year 1: 94%, 95% CI -1% to 100%, 1 trial, 1625 participants; very low-certainty evidence). These data come from a single cluster-randomized trial in children aged six months to 12 years and conducted in India. For single dose Vi-TT (Typbar-TCV), we found no efficacy trials evaluating the vaccine with natural exposure.There were no reported serious adverse effects in RCTs of any of the vaccines studied. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: The licensed Ty21a and Vi polysaccharide vaccines are efficacious in adults and children older than two years in endemic countries. The Vi-rEPA vaccine is just as efficacious, although data is only available for children. The new Vi-TT vaccine (PedaTyph) requires further evaluation to determine if it provides protection against typhoid fever. At the time of writing, there were only efficacy data from a human challenge setting in adults on the Vi-TT vaccine (Tybar), which clearly justify the ongoing field trials to evaluate vaccine efficacy.

Treatment of Carbapenem-Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia: Retrospective Comparison Between Intravenous Colistin and Intravenous Ampicillin-Sulbactam.

Carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii has been increasingly reported as the causative agent of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) among patients in the intensive care units. However, there are insufficient data to guide the appropriate treatment for such infection. Our aim was to compare the outcome of carbapenem-resistant A. baumannii VAP treated with colistin or with ampicillin-sulbactam. We conducted a retrospective study of patients diagnosed with carbapenem-resistant A. baumannii VAP during 2008 and 2009. Clinical and microbiologic cure rates, 30-day mortality, and change in renal function were compared between patients treated with colistin versus those treated with ampicillin-sulbactam. The association between treatment and mortality was examined through multivariable logistic regression analysis. Of the 98 patients diagnosed with carbapenem-resistant A. baumannii VAP, 66 were treated with colistin and 32 with ampicillin-sulbactam. Baseline characteristics of patients were similar, except for a longer intensive care unit stay and lower creatinine clearance test before VAP diagnosis among patients treated with colistin. Clinical cure rates were similar in the 2 groups. In the colistin group, microbiologic failure rates were higher at 7 days [16/33 (48%) vs. 3/17 (18%); P = 0.03]; patients had a more significant elevation in creatinine (+0.2 ± 1.0 mg/dL vs. -0.3 ± 1.1 mg/dL; P = 0.021), and treatment was associated with an increased 30-day mortality (adjusted-odds ratio, 6.5; 95% confidence interval, 1.348-31.342; P = 0.02). In conclusion, patients treated with colistin or ampicillin-sulbactam had similar clinical cure rates. However, colistin was associated with higher rates of microbiologic failure, reduction in renal function, and an increased 30-day mortality. A prospective study comparing high-dose colistin and ampicillin-sulbactam for the treatment of carbapenem-resistant A. baumannii VAP is warranted.

Oral iron supplements for children in malaria-endemic areas.

BACKGROUND: Iron-deficiency anaemia is common during childhood. Iron administration has been claimed to increase the risk of malaria. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effects and safety of iron supplementation, with or without folic acid, in children living in areas with hyperendemic or holoendemic malaria transmission. SEARCH METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Infectious Diseases Group Specialized Register; the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), published in the Cochrane Library, MEDLINE (up to August 2015) and LILACS (up to February 2015). We also checked the metaRegister of Controlled Trials (mRCT) and World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (WHO ICTRP) up to February 2015. We contacted the primary investigators of all included trials, ongoing trials, and those awaiting assessment to ask for unpublished data and further trials. We scanned references of included trials, pertinent reviews, and previous meta-analyses for additional references. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included individually randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cluster RCTs conducted in hyperendemic and holoendemic malaria regions or that reported on any malaria-related outcomes that included children younger than 18 years of age. We included trials that compared orally administered iron, iron with folic acid, and iron with antimalarial treatment versus placebo or no treatment. We included trials of iron supplementation or fortification interventions if they provided at least 80% of the Recommended Dietary Allowance (RDA) for prevention of anaemia by age. Antihelminthics could be administered to either group, and micronutrients had to be administered equally to both groups. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: The primary outcomes were clinical malaria, severe malaria, and death from any cause. We assessed the risk of bias in included trials with domain-based evaluation and assessed the quality of the evidence using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. We performed a fixed-effect meta-analysis for all outcomes and random-effects meta-analysis for hematological outcomes, and adjusted analyses for cluster RCTs. We based the subgroup analyses for anaemia at baseline, age, and malaria prevention or management services on trial-level data. MAIN RESULTS: Thirty-five trials (31,955 children) met the inclusion criteria. Overall, iron does not cause an excess of clinical malaria (risk ratio (RR) 0.93, 95% confidence intervals (CI) 0.87 to 1.00; 14 trials, 7168 children, high quality evidence). Iron probably does not cause an excess of clinical malaria in both populations where anaemia is common and those in which anaemia is uncommon. In areas where there are prevention and management services for malaria, iron (with or without folic acid) may reduce clinical malaria (RR 0.91, 95% CI 0.84 to 0.97; seven trials, 5586 participants, low quality evidence), while in areas where such services are unavailable, iron (with or without folic acid) may increase the incidence of malaria, although the lower CIs indicate no difference (RR 1.16, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.31; nine trials, 19,086 participants, low quality evidence). Iron supplementation does not cause an excess of severe malaria (RR 0.90, 95% CI 0.81 to 0.98; 6 trials, 3421 children, high quality evidence). We did not observe any differences for deaths (control event rate 1%, low quality evidence). Iron and antimalarial treatment reduced clinical malaria (RR 0.54, 95% CI 0.43 to 0.67; three trials, 728 children, high quality evidence). Overall, iron resulted in fewer anaemic children at follow up, and the end average change in haemoglobin from base line was higher with iron. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Iron treatment does not increase the risk of clinical malaria when regular malaria prevention or management services are provided. Where resources are limited, iron can be administered without screening for anaemia or for iron deficiency, as long as malaria prevention or management services are provided efficiently.

Antimicrobial drugs for treating cholera.

BACKGROUND: Cholera is an acute watery diarrhoea caused by infection with the bacterium Vibrio cholerae, which if severe can cause rapid dehydration and death. Effective management requires early diagnosis and rehydration using oral rehydration salts or intravenous fluids. In this review, we evaluate the additional benefits of treating cholera with antimicrobial drugs. OBJECTIVES: To quantify the benefit of antimicrobial treatment for patients with cholera, and determine whether there are differences between classes of antimicrobials or dosing schedules. SEARCH METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Infectious Disease Group Specialized Register; the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL); PubMed; EMBASE; African Index Medicus; LILACS; Science Citation Index; metaRegister of Controlled Trials; WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform; conference proceedings; and reference lists to March 2014. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomized and quasi-randomized controlled clinical trials in adults and children with cholera that compared: 1) any antimicrobial treatment with placebo or no treatment; 2) different antimicrobials head-to-head; or 3) different dosing schedules or different durations of treatment with the same antimicrobial. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two reviewers independently applied inclusion and exclusion criteria, and extracted data from included trials. Diarrhoea duration and stool volume were defined as primary outcomes. We calculated mean difference (MD) or ratio of means (ROM) for continuous outcomes, with 95% confidence intervals (CI), and pooled data using a random-effects meta-analysis. The quality of evidence was assessed using the GRADE approach. MAIN RESULTS: Thirty-nine trials were included in this review with 4623 participants. Antimicrobials versus placebo or no treatment Overall, antimicrobial therapy shortened the mean duration of diarrhoea by about a day and a half compared to placebo or no treatment (MD -36.77 hours, 95% CI -43.51 to -30.03, 19 trials, 1013 participants, moderate quality evidence). Antimicrobial therapy also reduced the total stool volume by 50% (ROM 0.5, 95% CI 0.45 to 0.56, 18 trials, 1042 participants, moderate quality evidence) and reduced the amount of rehydration fluids required by 40% (ROM 0.60, 95% CI 0.53 to 0.68, 11 trials, 1201 participants, moderate quality evidence). The mean duration of fecal excretion of vibrios was reduced by almost three days (MD 2.74 days, 95% CI -3.07 to -2.40, 12 trials, 740 participants, moderate quality evidence).There was substantial heterogeneity in the size of these benefits, probably due to differences in the antibiotic used, the trial methods (particularly effective randomization), and the timing of outcome assessment. The benefits of antibiotics were seen both in trials recruiting only patients with severe dehydration and in those recruiting patients with mixed levels of dehydration. Comparisons of antimicrobials In head-to-head comparisons, there were no differences detected in diarrhoea duration or stool volume for tetracycline compared to doxycycline (three trials, 230 participants, very low quality evidence); or tetracycline compared to ciprofloxacin or norfloxacin (three trials, 259 participants, moderate quality evidence). In indirect comparisons with substantially more trials, tetracycline appeared to have larger benefits than doxycycline, norfloxacin and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole for the primary review outcomes.Single dose azithromycin shortened the duration of diarrhoea by over a day compared to ciprofloxacin (MD -32.43, 95% CI -62.90 to -1.95, two trials, 375 participants, moderate quality evidence) and by half a day compared to erythromycin (MD -12.05, 95% CI -22.02 to -2.08, two trials, 179 participants, moderate quality evidence). It was not compared with tetracycline. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: In treating cholera, antimicrobials result in substantial improvements in clinical and microbiological outcomes, with similar effects observed in severely and non-severely ill patients. Azithromycin and tetracycline may have some advantages over other antibiotics.

Amikacin treatment in urinary tract infection patients: evaluating the risk of acute kidney injury - a retrospective cohort study.

The rise in ESBL-producing and carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacterial infections is alarming. Aminoglycosides remain attractive for treating urinary tract infections (UTIs). However, aminoglycosides-associated acute kidney injury (AKI) raises concerns, especially in patients with underlying renal impairment. We conducted a retrospective cohort study to evaluate the risk of AKI in patients with UTI empirically treated with amikacin. Among 395 patients (median age 41.9 years [IQR 28.3-67.1], 342 [86.6%] female), 162 (41.0%) received amikacin and 233 (59.0%) were empirically treated with other antibiotics. AKI incidence was low (5.6%) and not associated with amikacin exposure (OR 0.56, 95% CI 0.22-1.43, p = 0.23), even in those with pre-existing renal impairment or AKI on admission. The clinical outcomes (including cure by the third day, AKI, maximal creatinine, length of stay, mortality, and readmission) did not differ between the groups. Once-daily amikacin may offer a safe UTI treatment option amid increasing multi-drug resistance.

[Thoracic nocardiosis with thoracic manifestations in two immunocompetent patients].

Nocardiosis is a rare infectious disease caused by bacteria of the genus nocardia, which causes considerable morbidity and mortality. We report two unusual cases of nocardiosis in young, immunocompetent patients; the first case involved a nocardia farcinica pulmonary and chest-wall infection, while the second was an anterior mediastinal nocardia asiaticum infection mimicking a mediastinal tumor. These cases reflect the need for a broad differential diagnosis during exploration of thoracic findings, white the potentially ambiguous presentation of nocardiosis must be considered.

Combining reservoir mask oxygenation with high-flow nasal cannula in the treatment of hypoxemic respiratory failure among patients with COVID-19 pneumonia: a retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Concerns regarding positive-pressure-ventilation for the treatment of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) hypoxemia led the search for alternative oxygenation techniques. This study aimed to assess one such method, dual oxygenation, i.e., the addition of a reservoir mask (RM) on top of a high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC). METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, the records of all patients hospitalized with COVID-19 during 2020-2022 were reviewed. Patients over the age of 18 years with hypoxemia necessitating HFNC were included. Exclusion criteria were positive-pressure-ventilation for any indication other than hypoxemic respiratory failure, transfer to another facility while still on HFNC and "do-not-intubate/resuscitate" orders. The primary outcome was mortality within 30 days from the first application of HFNC. Secondary outcomes were intubation and admission to the intensive care unit. RESULTS: Of 659 patients included in the final analysis, 316 were treated with dual oxygenation and 343 with HFNC alone. Propensity for treatment was estimated based on background diagnoses, laboratories and vital signs upon admission, gender and glucocorticoid dose. Inverse probability of treatment weighted regression including age, body mass index, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score and respiratory rate oxygenation index showed treatment with dual oxygenation to be associated with lower 30-day mortality (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.615; 95% confidence interval, 0.469-0.809). Differences in the secondary outcomes did not reach statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that the addition of RM on top of HFNC may be associated with decreased mortality in patients with severe COVID-19 hypoxemia.

Host test based on tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand, interferon gamma-induced protein-10 and C-reactive protein for differentiating bacterial and viral respiratory tract infections in adults: diagnostic accuracy study.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the performance of a test (called BV), integrating the blood levels of three immune proteins into a score, to differentiate bacterial from viral infection among adults with suspected lower respiratory tract infection (LRTI). METHODS: Prospective diagnostic accuracy study, enrolling febrile adults >18 years with LRTI signs or symptoms for less than 7 days presenting to several hospitals' emergency departments in Israel. The main exclusion criterion was immunodeficiency. Reference standard diagnosis (bacterial/viral/indeterminate) was based on three experts independently reviewing comprehensive patient data including follow-up data. BV generated three results: viral infection or other nonbacterial condition (0 ≤ score < 35), equivocal (35 ≤ score ≤ 65) and bacterial infection including co-infection (65 < score ≤ 100). BV performance was assessed against the reference standard with indeterminate reference standard and equivocal BV cases removed. RESULTS: Of 490 enrolled patients, 415 met eligibility criteria (median age 56 years, interquartile range 35). The reference standard classified 104 patients as bacterial, 210 as viral and 101 as indeterminate. BV was equivocal in 9.6% (30/314). Excluding indeterminate reference standard diagnoses and equivocal BV results, BV's sensitivity for bacterial infection was 98.1% (101/103; 95% confidence interval 95.4-100), specificity 88.4% (160/181; 83.7-93.1) and negative predictive value 98.8% (160/162; 97.1-100). DISCUSSION: BV exhibited high diagnostic performance for febrile adults with suspected LRTI among patients with reference standard diagnoses of bacterial or viral LRTI.

Lack of evidence for chloroquine-resistant Plasmodium falciparum malaria, Leogane, Haiti.

Plasmodium falciparum malaria in Haiti is considered chloroquine susceptible, although resistance transporter alleles associated with chloroquine resistance were recently detected. Among 49 patients with falciparum malaria, we found neither parasites carrying haplotypes associated with chloroquine resistance nor instances of chloroquine treatment failure. Continued vigilance to detect emergence of chloroquine resistance is needed.