RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Sedation increases colonoscopy risks and prolongs recovery time. We examined whether virtual reality (VR) can substitute for sedation. The primary outcome was the overall satisfaction of patients who underwent colonoscopy with VR headset compared with patients who underwent standard sedation. Pain during the procedure, polyp detection rate (PDR), colonoscopy duration, post-colonoscopy adverse events, post-colonoscopy recovery, time-to-return to daily functions, and turnaround time at the endoscopy unit were secondary outcomes. METHODS: The study was approved by Sheba Medical Center's ethics committee IRB number 21-8177-SMC. Sixty patients were sequentially enrolled in a 1:1 ratio to either standard sedated colonoscopy or VR-unsedated procedure, and all patients signed a written informed consent. 28/30 patients successfully completed the colonoscopy using VR headset. Overall satisfaction score was comparable between the groups. RESULTS: There was no difference between VR and controls in colonoscopy duration, or PDR. VR patients had numerically lower rate of post-colonoscopy adverse events than controls. The proportion of VR patients who reported resuming daily activities on the day of the procedure was significantly higher than in the control group. The VR group patients spent significantly less time in the hospital compared to the control group. CONCLUSIONS: VR technology can provide adequate substitution for sedation for most patients undergoing colonoscopy and offers comparable patient satisfaction and faster return to daily activities.
RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Patency capsule (PC) is a recommended procedure to rule out small bowel stenosis before video capsule endoscopy (VCE). We examined future clinical outcomes among patients with a failed PC vs patients in whom the PC had passed (passed PC). METHODS: A post hoc analysis of 2 prospective cohort studies of adult patients with quiescent small bowel Crohn's disease (CD) who underwent PC between 2013 and 2020. The primary composite outcome was the need for intestinal surgery or endoscopic dilation during follow-up in patients with or without a failed PC. RESULTS: A total of 190 patients were included (47: failed PC and 143: passed PC, median follow-up 34.12 months). Patients with a failed PC had higher rates of the primary composite outcome (21.3% vs 1.4%, hazard ratio [HR] 20.3, 95% confidence interval [CI] 4.4-93.7, P < 0.001) and also secondary outcomes including intestinal surgery (14.9% vs 0.70%, P < 0.001), endoscopic dilation (14.9% vs 0.70%, P < 0.001), admissions (23.3% vs 5.7%, P < 0.001), and clinical flares (43.9% vs 27.7%, P = 0.005) during follow-up compared with controls. Failed PC was the only statistically significant factor for surgery and/or endoscopic dilation, regardless of a B2/B3 phenotype at baseline. In sensitivity analyses restricted only to patients with a stricturing phenotype (n = 73), a failed PC still predicted the long-term composite outcome (HR 8.68, 95% CI 1.72-43.68, P = 0.002). Of the 190 patients ingesting a PC, only 1 patient with a failed PC had 48 hours of self-limiting mild symptoms. DISCUSSION: Patients with clinically stable CD with a failed PC have worse long-term clinical outcomes than those without, independently of the CD phenotype. Standalone PC may serve as a novel, safe, and affordable prognostic examination to identify patients with quiescent CD who have a higher risk for future worse clinical outcomes.
Asunto(s)
Endoscopía Capsular , Enfermedad de Crohn , Obstrucción Intestinal , Humanos , Enfermedad de Crohn/diagnóstico , Estudios Prospectivos , Obstrucción Intestinal/etiología , Obstrucción Intestinal/diagnóstico , Constricción PatológicaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Crohn's disease (CD) is a chronic relapsing-remitting gut inflammatory disorder with a heterogeneous unpredictable course. Dysbiosis occurs in CD; however, whether microbial dynamics in quiescent CD are instrumental in increasing the risk of a subsequent flare remains undefined. METHODS: We analyzed the long-term dynamics of microbial composition in a prospective observational cohort of patients with quiescent CD (45 cases, 217 samples) over 2 years or until clinical flare occurred, aiming to identify whether changes in the microbiome precede and predict clinical relapse. Machine learning was used to prioritize microbial and clinical factors that discriminate between relapsers and nonrelapsers in the quiescent phase. RESULTS: Patients with CD in clinical, biomarker, and mucosal remission showed significantly reduced microbial richness and increased dysbiosis index compared with healthy controls. Of the 45 patients with quiescent CD, 12 (27%) flared during follow-up. Samples in quiescent patients preceding flare showed significantly reduced abundance of Christensenellaceae and S24.7, and increased abundance of Gemellaceae compared with those in remission throughout. A composite flare index was associated with a subsequent flare. Notably, higher individualized microbial instability in the quiescent phase was associated with a higher risk of a subsequent flare (hazard ratio 11.32, 95% confidence interval 3-42, P = 0.0035) using two preflare samples. Importantly, machine learning prioritized the flare index and the intrapersonal instability over clinical factors to best discriminate between relapsers and nonrelapsers. DISCUSSION: Individualized microbial variations in quiescent CD significantly increase the risk of future exacerbation and may provide a model to guide personalized preemptive therapy intensification.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedad de Crohn/microbiología , Enfermedad de Crohn/patología , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Disbiosis/complicaciones , Microbioma Gastrointestinal/fisiología , Monitoreo Fisiológico/métodos , Adulto , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Enfermedad de Crohn/terapia , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Mucosa Intestinal/microbiología , Modelos Lineales , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Estudios Prospectivos , Recurrencia , Valores de Referencia , Medición de Riesgo , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Estadísticas no Paramétricas , Factores de TiempoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Adalimumab is usually self-injected at home, making prospective serial-sampling studies challenging and scarce. This has led to a gap in knowledge about evolution of anti-adalimumab antibodies (AAAs) over time and its correlation with clinical and inflammatory outcomes. METHODS: A program for home visits by physicians at induction, every 3 months and at event of relapse, was established prospectively for Crohn's disease (CD) patients. At each visit, patients' clinical scores were determined and sera were obtained for C-reactive protein, drug, and AAA levels. This cohort was compared to a parallel prospective cohort of infliximab-treated CD patients. In a subgroup of 29 patients, trough and in-between-trough levels were compared, to elucidate the importance of timing of sampling during the injection cycle. RESULTS: Ninety-eight CD patients starting adalimumab were prospectively followed (median follow-up 44 weeks) and 621 serum samples were analyzed. Thirty-three patients (32%) developed AAA; 18/33 (55%) of them as early as week 2, and 26/33 (79%) by week 14. Induction period AAAs were strongly associated with primary non-response (odds ratio (OR) = 5.4, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.6-17.8, p = 0.005). As compared to antibodies-to-infliximab (ATI), AAA formation rate over time was significantly lower (p = 0.01) and AAA were much more specific-85% of AAA events were associated with loss-of-response compared with 58% rate for ATI (p = 0.01). In 29 patients sampled serially during an injection cycle, levels of drug and AAA seemed comparable between four time-points during a single cycle both in patients with or without AAA (n = 8, n = 21, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: When followed prospectively and serially, AAAs are found to arise earlier than previously appreciated and their impact may be more pronounced for primary rather than secondary, non-response. Drug and AAA levels were similar both at trough and in-between injections, enabling to simplify therapeutic drug monitoring of adalimumab.
Asunto(s)
Adalimumab/inmunología , Antiinflamatorios/inmunología , Enfermedad de Crohn/tratamiento farmacológico , Monitoreo de Drogas/estadística & datos numéricos , Adalimumab/administración & dosificación , Adalimumab/sangre , Adulto , Antiinflamatorios/administración & dosificación , Antiinflamatorios/sangre , Proteína C-Reactiva/análisis , Enfermedad de Crohn/sangre , Enfermedad de Crohn/inmunología , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Infliximab/administración & dosificación , Infliximab/sangre , Infliximab/inmunología , Masculino , Estudios Prospectivos , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Helicobacter pylori (HP) infection is present in about 50% of the global population, and is associated with chronic gastritis, peptic disease and gastric malignancies. HP prevalence in Crohn's disease (CD) patients was shown to be low compared to the general population, and its influence on disease activity is yet to be determined. Our aims were to determine the prevalence of HP in a selected group of CD patients with quiescent disease, and to assess the influence of its eradication on disease activity and endoscopic and laboratory activity measures. METHODS: Consecutive CD patients with quiescent disease underwent meticulous disease evaluation with MR enterography (MRE), video capsule endoscopy (VCE), CRP, fecal calprotectin and CDAI. All patients were tested for the presence of HP using stool antigen detection kit. Patients infected with HP were offered eradication treatment with sequential therapy. HP eradication was confirmed using urease breath test and stool antigen test. The influence of HP eradication on disease activity was assessed. RESULTS: Out of 56 patients enrolled, six patients (10.7%) had HP infection. Of them, five patients had gastro- duodenitis per VCE. All HP positive patients were offered eradication treatment and underwent successful eradication. Notably, 23 (50%) of patients had proximal disease per VCE, most of them (78%) were HP negative. CDAI, CRP, fecal calprotectin and VCE Lewis inflammatory score did not change significantly following HP eradication, Gastric findings on VCE were not impacted by HP eradication. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of HP infection in patients with quiescent CD is relatively low. Eradication of the bacteria did not significantly change neither disease activity measures nor the presence of gastro- duodenitis per VCE, suggesting it might be part of proximal CD. The influence of HP on CD activity merits further investigation.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedad de Crohn/microbiología , Infecciones por Helicobacter/epidemiología , Helicobacter pylori , Adulto , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Proteína C-Reactiva/análisis , Endoscopía Capsular , Enfermedad de Crohn/diagnóstico por imagen , Enfermedad de Crohn/patología , Erradicación de la Enfermedad , Heces/química , Heces/microbiología , Femenino , Infecciones por Helicobacter/complicaciones , Infecciones por Helicobacter/tratamiento farmacológico , Humanos , Complejo de Antígeno L1 de Leucocito/análisis , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética/métodos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Prevalencia , Índice de Severidad de la EnfermedadRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Mucosal healing (MH) and deep remission (DR) are associated with improved outcomes in Crohn's disease (CD). However, most of the current data pertain to colonic MH and DR, whereas the evidence regarding the prevalence and impact of small bowel (SB) MH is scarce. The aim of this study was to to evaluate the prevalence of SBMH and DR in quiescent SBCD. METHODS: Patients with known SBCD in clinical remission (CDAI<150) or with mild symptoms (CDAI<220) were prospectively recruited and underwent video capsule endoscopy after verification of SB patency. Inflammation was quantified using the Lewis score (LS). SBMH was defined as LS<135, whereas a significant inflammation was defined as LS>790. Clinico-biomarker remission was defined as a combination of clinical remission and normal biomarkers. DR was defined as a combination of clinico-biomarker remission and MH. RESULTS: Fifty-six patients with proven SB patency were enrolled; 52 (92.9%) patients were in clinical remission and 21 (40.4%) in clinico-biomarker remission. SBMH was demonstrated in 8/52 (15.4%) of patients in clinical remission. Moderate-to-severe SB inflammation was demonstrated in 11/52 (21.1%) of patients in clinical remission and in 1/21 (4.7%) of patients in clinical and biomarker remission. Only 7/52 (13.5%) patients were in DR. CONCLUSIONS: SB inflammation is detected in the majority of CD patients in clinical and biomarker remission. SBMH and DR were rare and were independent of treatment modality. Our findings represent the true inflammatory burden in quiescent patients with SBCD.
Asunto(s)
Biomarcadores/análisis , Endoscopía Capsular/métodos , Enfermedad de Crohn/diagnóstico , Diagnóstico por Imagen , Mucosa Intestinal/patología , Intestino Delgado/patología , Adulto , Enfermedad de Crohn/metabolismo , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Mucosa Intestinal/metabolismo , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética/métodos , Masculino , Estudios Prospectivos , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Factores de TiempoRESUMEN
Background: Video capsule endoscopy (VCE) has been proven to accurately diagnose small-bowel inflammation and predict flares among patients with quiescent Crohn's disease (CD). However, data regarding its predictive role in this population over an extended follow-up are scarce. Objectives: To predict clinical exacerbation and to assess the yield of Lewis score in identifying CD patients with future clinical exacerbation during an extended follow-up (>24 months). Design: A post hoc analysis study. Methods: Adult patients with quiescent small-bowel CD who were followed with VCE, inflammatory biomarkers and magnetic resonance enterography in a prospective study (between 2013 and 2018). We extracted extended clinical data (up to April 2022). The primary composite outcome (i.e. clinical exacerbation) was defined as intestinal surgery, endoscopic dilation, CD-related admission, corticosteroid administration, or biological/immunomodulator treatment change during follow-up. Results: Of the 61 patients in the study [median age 29 (24-37) years, male 57.4%, biologic treatment 46.7%], 18 patients met the primary outcome during an extended follow-up [median 58.0 (34.5-93.0) months]. On univariable analysis, complicated [hazard ratio (HR) 7.348, p = 0.002] and stricturing disease phenotype (HR 5.305, p = 0.001) were associated with higher risk for clinical exacerbation during follow-up. A baseline VCE middle small-bowel segment Lewis score (midLS) ⩾ 135 identified patients with future exacerbation [AUC (area under the curve) 0.767, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.633-0.902, p = 0.001, HR 6.317, 93% negative predictive value], whereas the AUC of the conventional Lewis score was 0.734 (95% CI: 0.589-0.879, p = 0.004). Sensitivity analysis restricted to patients with either complicated (n = 34) or stricturing (n = 26) disease phenotype revealed that midLS still predicted clinical exacerbation during follow-up (AUC 0.747/0.753, respectively), in these patients. Conclusion: MidLS predicts treatment failure in quiescent CD patients (median follow-up of 5 years) independently of disease phenotype.
RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Syndecan-1 (SDC1) has multiple functions in tumorigenesis in general and specifically in pancreatic cancer. We aimed to evaluate SDC1 as a diagnostic and prognostic biomarker in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). METHODS: In this case-control study, patients newly diagnosed with a biopsy-proven PDAC were enrolled alongside healthy individuals in a derivation-validation cohort design. Serum SDC1 was measured by enzyme-linked immunoassay. The diagnostic accuracy of SDC1 levels for diagnosing PDAC was computed. A unified cohort enriched with additional early-stage patients with PDAC was used to evaluate the association of SDC1 with survival outcomes and patient characteristics. RESULTS: In the derivation cohort, serum SDC1 levels were significantly higher in patients with PDAC (n = 39) compared with healthy controls (n = 20) (40.1 ng/mL, interquartile range 29.8-95.3 vs 25.6 ng/mL, interquartile range 17.1-29.8, respectively; P < 0.001). The receiver operating characteristic analysis area under the curve was 0.847 (95% confidence interval 0.747-0.947, P < 0.001). These results were replicated in a separate age-matched validation cohort (n = 38 PDAC, n = 38 controls; area under the curve 0.844, 95% confidence interval 0.757-0.932, P < 0.001). In the combined-enriched PDAC cohort (n = 110), using a cutoff of 35 ng/mL, the median overall 5-year survival between patients below and above this cutoff was not significantly different, although a trend for better survival after 1 year was found in the lower level group (P = 0.06). There were 12 of the 110 patients with PDAC (11%) who had normal CA 19-9 in the presence of elevated SDC1. DISCUSSION: These findings suggest serum SDC1 as a promising novel biomarker for early blood-based diagnosis of pancreatic cancer.
Asunto(s)
Carcinoma Ductal Pancreático , Neoplasias Pancreáticas , Sindecano-1/sangre , Biomarcadores de Tumor , Carcinoma Ductal Pancreático/patología , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Humanos , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/patología , Neoplasias PancreáticasRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Capsule endoscopy is an important modality for monitoring of Crohn's disease. Recently, a novel panenteric capsule, PillCam Crohn's (Medtronic, USA), was approved for use. No quantitative index of inflammation for this method is currently available. This sub-study of a prospective randomized controlled Comprehensive individUalized pRoactive ThErapy of Crohn's Disease trial (CURE-CD) which aimed to compare the correlation and reliability of the novel PillCam Crohn's score with the existing small bowel capsule Lewis inflammatory score. METHODS: The study cohort included Crohn's disease patients in remission who were evaluated with PillCam Crohn's. Each result was independently reviewed by two experienced readers. Inflammation was scored in all studies using Lewis inflammatory score and PillCam Crohn's score (comprised of a sum of scores for most common and most severe lesions multiplied by percentage of segmental involvement + stricture score). RESULTS: Fifty-four PillCam Crohn's studies from 41 patients were included. The median Lewis inflammatory score was 225 for both readers. The median PillCam Crohn's score was six (0-14) and four (3-15) for readers 1 and 2, respectively. There was a high inter-rater reliability coefficient between the two readers for Lewis inflammatory and PillCam Crohn's score (0.9, p < 0.0001 for both). The correlation between PillCam Crohn's score and fecal calprotectin was stronger than for Lewis inflammatory score (r = 0.32 and 0.54 respectively, p = 0.001 for both). CONCLUSIONS: The novel panenteric capsule score correlates well with the Lewis inflammatory score, has excellent reliability, and may be potentially more accurate in estimation of the panenteric inflammatory burden.
Asunto(s)
Endoscopía Capsular/instrumentación , Enfermedad de Crohn/diagnóstico , Mucosa Intestinal/diagnóstico por imagen , Intestino Delgado/diagnóstico por imagen , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Adulto , Enfermedad de Crohn/inmunología , Femenino , Humanos , Mucosa Intestinal/inmunología , Intestino Delgado/inmunología , Masculino , Estudios Prospectivos , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The optimal monitoring strategy for predicting disease course in Crohn's disease remains undefined. We aimed to evaluate the accuracy, safety, and tolerability of an intensive monitoring strategy designed to predict the future course of Crohn's disease in patients with quiescent disease. METHODS: In a prospective observational cohort study, we recruited patients older than 18 years with quiescent (for 3-24 months) Crohn's disease involving the small bowel with confirmed small bowel patency from three tertiary medical centres in Israel. Enrolled patients underwent baseline magnetic resonance enterography (MRE) and patency capsule, clinical or biomarker assessment every 3 months, and video capsule endoscopy (VCE) at baseline and every 6 months for 2 years or until a clinical flare (the primary outcome, defined as an increase in the Crohn's disease activity index score by 70 points or more) or disease worsening necessitating treatment intensification. We assessed the ability of the different Crohn's disease monitoring methods used to predict the occurrence of a flare during the 24-month follow-up period. FINDINGS: Of 90 screened patients, 29 were excluded (17 because of non-patent small bowel). Of the 61 patients enrolled between July 3, 2013, and Feb 1, 2015, 17 (28%) had a flare during the 24-month follow-up. No clinicodemographic parameter predicted future flare. A baseline VCE Lewis score of 350 or more identified patients with future flare (area under the curve [AUC] 0·79, 95% CI 0·66-0·88; p<0·0001; hazard ratio 10·7, 3·8-30·3). C-reactive protein at baseline had an AUC of 0·73 (0·6-0·84; p=0·0013) for predicting flare. The AUC of baseline faecal calprotectin for the prediction of flare occurring within 2 years was 0·62 (0·49-0·74; p=0·17), but progressively improved for shorter timespans and reached an AUC of 0·81 (0·76-0·85) for the prediction of flare occurring within 3 months. Of four MRE-based indices, only MRE global score correlated with 2-year flare risk (AUC 0·71, 0·58-0·82; p=0·024). During follow-up, a Lewis score increase of 383 points or more from baseline predicted imminent disease exacerbation within 6 months (AUC 0·79, 0·65-0·89; p=0·011). The safety and tolerability of the 231 VCEs ingested was excellent, with none being retained. INTERPRETATION: In patients with quiescent Crohn's disease involving the small bowel, faecal calprotectin predicts short-term flare risk, whereas VCE predicts both short-term and long-term risk of disease exacerbation. If corroborated by additional studies, protocols incorporating VCE could expand the scope of available methods for monitoring disease activity and predicting outcomes in small bowel Crohn's disease. FUNDING: The Leona M & Harry B Helmsley Charitable Trust.
Asunto(s)
Endoscopía Capsular , Enfermedad de Crohn/fisiopatología , Cicatrización de Heridas/fisiología , Adulto , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Femenino , Humanos , Mucosa Intestinal/fisiología , Intestino Delgado/fisiología , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Estudios Prospectivos , Recurrencia , Factores de Riesgo , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Matrix metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9) is a novel marker of intestinal inflammation. The aim of this study was to assess if serum MMP-9 levels predict clinical flare in patients with quiescent Crohn's disease (CD). METHODS: This study was a post hoc analysis of a prospective observational study in which quiescent CD patients were included and followed until clinical relapse or the end of a 2-year follow-up period. Serial C-reactive protein (CRP) and fecal calprotectin (FC) levels were measured, and the patients underwent repeated capsule endoscopies (CEs) every 6 months. Small bowel inflammation was quantified by Lewis score (LS) for CE. A baseline magnetic resonance enterography was also performed, and MaRIA score was calculated. Serum MMP-9 levels in baseline blood samples were quantified by ELISA. RESULTS: Out of 58 eligible enrolled patients, 16 had a flare. Higher levels of baseline MMP-9 were found in patients who developed subsequent symptomatic flare compared with patients who did not [median 661 ng/ml, 25-75 interquartile range (IQR; 478.2-1441.3) versus 525.5 ng/ ml (339-662.7), respectively, p = 0.01]. Patients with serum MMP-9 levels of 945 ng/ ml or higher were at increased risk for relapse within 24 months [area under the curve (AUC) of 0.72 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.56-0.88]; hazard ratio 8.1 (95% CI 3.0-21.9, p < 0.001)]. Serum MMP-9 concentrations showed weak and moderate correlation to baseline LS and FC, respectively (r = 0.31, p = 0.02; r = 0.46, p < 0.001). No correlation was found between serum MMP-9 to CRP and MaRIA score. CONCLUSIONS: Serum MMP-9 may be a promising biomarker for prediction of clinical flare in CD patients with quiescent disease.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Small-bowel capsule endoscopy (CE) is a prime modality for evaluation of the small bowel. The Lewis score (LS) and the Capsule Endoscopy Crohn's Disease Activity Index (CECDAI) are validated endoscopic indices for quantification of small-bowel inflammation on CE. It is unclear whether these indexes are interchangeable for the evaluation of mucosal inflammation in established Crohn's disease (CD). The aim of this study was to compare the quantitative evaluation of small- bowel inflammation by LS and CECDAI. METHODS: Patients with known quiescent small-bowel CD for at least 3 months (Crohn's disease activity index < 150) were prospectively recruited and underwent CE. The LS was calculated using RAPID 8 capsule-reading software and the CECDAI was calculated manually. Cumulative LS (C-LS) was calculated by summation of individual tertile LS. Fecal calprotectin (FCP) and C-reactive protein (CRP) levels were measured and correlated with the scores. RESULTS: A total of 50 patients were included in the study. There was a moderate correlation between the worst segment LS and CECDAI (Pearson's r = 0.66, p = 0.001), and a strong correlation between C-LS and CECDAI (r = 0.81, p = 0.0001). CECDAI < 5.4 corresponded to mucosal healing (LS < 135), while CECDAI > 9.2 corresponded to moderate-to-severe inflammation (LS ⩾ 790). There was a moderate correlation between capsule scores and FCP levels (r = 0.39, p = 0.002 for LS, r = 0.48, p = 0.001 for C-LS, and r = 0.53, p = 0.001 for CECDAI, respectively). CRP levels were not significantly correlated with either score. CONCLUSIONS: CECDAI and C-LS are strongly correlated and perform similarly for quantitative assessment of mucosal inflammation in established CD.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Capsule endoscopy [CE] and magnetic resonance enterography [MRE] are prime modalities for evaluation of the small bowel in Crohn's disease [CD]. Detection of proximal small bowel [SB] inflammation in CD by MRE is challenging. Currently available quantitative MRE scores do not incorporate proximal SB data. The MRE global score [MEGS] was designed for quantitative evaluation of the entire digestive tract; its accuracy in the proximal SB has not previously been evaluated. This study compared the evaluation of the small bowel inflammation by MEGS and CE-derived quantitative score (the Lewis score[LS]). METHODS: CD patients in stable clinical remission were prospectively recruited and underwent MRE and CE; faecal calprotectin [FC] levels were obtained. MEGS was calculated for each SB segment and the entire SB [SBMEGS]. SB inflammation on CE was quantified using LS. A cumulative Lewis score [C-LS] was calculated based on summation of three tertiles scores. RESULTS: Fifty patients were included. There was a significant correlation of SBMEGS with LS and C-LS [r = 0.61 and 0.71, both p = 0.001]. The correlation with FC was stronger for MEGS than for LS or C-LS [r = 0.68 vs r = 0.46 vs r = 0.53, all p = 0.001]. The correlation between the proximal LS and MEGS was significant [r = 0.55, p = 0.001]; median MEGS was significantly different in patients, with LS values consistent with mucosal healing, mild and moderate-to-severe inflammation. CONCLUSIONS: MEGS provides accurate evaluation of the SB and strongly correlates with FC; the main advantage of MEGS is the accurate quantification of proximal SB inflammation unavailable for alternative MRE scores.
Asunto(s)
Endoscopía Capsular , Enfermedad de Crohn/diagnóstico por imagen , Intestino Delgado/diagnóstico por imagen , Complejo de Antígeno L1 de Leucocito/análisis , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Adolescente , Adulto , Heces/química , Femenino , Humanos , Mucosa Intestinal/fisiopatología , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética/métodos , Masculino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Cicatrización de Heridas , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Crohn's disease is associated with accumulation of progressive structural bowel damage (SBD) leading to the development of stenotic and penetrating complications. The data pertaining to the course of progression of SBD is scarce. The Lemann index (LI) is a novel tool for evaluation of SBD that incorporates pan-enteric clinical, endoscopic and imaging data. AIMS: To evaluate the progression of SBD in quiescent CD patients. METHODS: Patients with known quiescent small bowel Crohn's disease (CD) for at least 3 months (CDAI<220) were prospectively recruited and underwent repeated magnetic resonance enterographies (MRE) and video capsule endoscopies (VCE). Patients were assessed for SBD on initial and follow-up evaluation using relevant clinicopathological data, MRE and VCE results. Significant structural bowel damage (SBD) was identified as LI>4.8, and progression of SBD as LI>0.3. RESULTS: Sixty one patients were enrolled in the study. Significant SBD was detected 13 (21.4%) on enrollment. Duration of disease (p=0.036) and history of CD-related surgery (p=0.0001) were associated with significant BD. Forty one patients underwent a follow-up MRE (14.8±2.5 months apart). LI was similar at baseline and follow-up. There was a negligible change in LI between the evaluations. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with quiescent Crohn's disease, structural bowel damage was stable over a median of 14 months follow-up.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedad de Crohn/diagnóstico por imagen , Enfermedad de Crohn/fisiopatología , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Intestino Delgado/diagnóstico por imagen , Adolescente , Adulto , Endoscopía Capsular , Constricción Patológica/diagnóstico por imagen , Constricción Patológica/patología , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Intestino Delgado/patología , Israel , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Masculino , Estudios Prospectivos , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The classification of Crohn's disease (CD) is usually determined at initial diagnosis and is frequently based on ileocolonoscopic and cross-sectional imaging data. Advanced endoscopic and imaging techniques such as small-bowel video capsule endoscopy (VCE) and magnetic resonance enterography (MRE) may provide additional data regarding disease extent and phenotype. Our aim was to examine whether VCE or MRE performed after the initial diagnosis may alter the original disease classification. METHODS: Consecutive patients with known small-bowel CD in clinical remission or mild disease were prospectively recruited and underwent MRE and VCE (if small-bowel patency was confirmed by a patency capsule (PC). Montreal classifications before and after evaluation were compared. RESULTS: Seventy-nine patients underwent MRE and VCE was performed in 56. Previously unrecognized disease locations were detected with VCE and MRE in 51 and 25%, respectively (p < 0.01) and by both modalities combined in 44 patients (55%). Twenty-two patients (27%) were reclassified as having an advanced phenotype (B2/B3). MRE and VCE reclassified the phenotype in 26 and 11% of cases, respectively (p < 0.05). Overall, both modalities combined altered the original Montreal classification in 49/76 patients (64%). CONCLUSION: VCE and MRE may lead to reclassification of the original phenotype in a significant percentage of CD patients in remission. VCE was more sensitive for detection of previously unrecognized locations, while MRE was superior for detection of phenotype shift. The described changes in the disease classification may have an important impact on both clinical management and long-term prognosis in these patients.
Asunto(s)
Endoscopía Capsular , Enfermedad de Crohn/clasificación , Enfermedad de Crohn/diagnóstico por imagen , Intestino Delgado/diagnóstico por imagen , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Adulto , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Israel , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Fenotipo , Estudios ProspectivosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Despite differences in the information obtained by capsule endoscopy (CE) and magnetic resonance enterography (MRE), one of these modalities is usually needed when evaluating disease activity. There are no data on patients' preference that would help guide the choice between these two modalities in these instances. AIM: To compare patients' tolerance and preference to MRE versus CE. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with known small bowel Crohn's disease (CD) in clinical remission (Crohn's disease activity index [CDAI] <150) or with mild symptoms (CDAI <220) were prospectively recruited. All patients underwent MRE followed by CE. Patients were asked to fill out a questionnaire addressing specific points regarding inconvenience during the preparation for the procedures, the procedures, and postprocedures. Side effects and procedure preference were addressed. Questionnaires were included for analysis only when more than 95% of the items were addressed. RESULTS: Fifty-six patients fulfilled inclusion criteria. Pre-exam discomfort, during-exam discomfort, nausea, vomiting, bloating, and abdominal pain were all significantly more prominent in MRE as compared to CE (P<0.0001, P<0.0001, P<0.0001, P=0.009, P=0.0002, P<0.0001, respectively). MRE was perceived as a more difficult procedure (P<0.0001). Furthermore, MRE was associated with a specific adverse event - claustrophobia. Seventy-eight percent of patients (44 patients) preferred to repeat CE as compared to 22% (P<0.0001) who preferred MRE. CONCLUSION: CE was better tolerated by CD patients compared to MRE and was preferred by 78% of patients. The superior tolerability of CE should be considered along with the diagnostic features, and more data sought when choosing between these two modalities for CD patients for long-term follow-up.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Video capsule endoscopy (VCE) and magnetic resonance enterography (MRE) are the prime modalities for the evaluation of small bowel (SB) Crohn's disease (CD). Mucosal inflammation on VCE is quantified using the Lewis score (LS). Diffusion-weighted (DW) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) allows for accurate assessment of SB inflammation without administration of intravenous contrast material. The Magnetic Resonance Index of Activity (MaRiA) and the Clermont index are quantitative activity indices validated for contrast-enhanced MRE and DW-MRE, respectively. The aim of this study was to compare the quantification of distal SB inflammation by VCE and MR-related activity indices. METHODS: Patients with known quiescent SB CD were prospectively recruited and underwent MRE and VCE. LS, MaRIA and Clermont scores were calculated for the distal SB. RESULTS: Both MRI-based indices significantly correlated with the LS and the Clermont index (r = 0.50, p = 0.001 and r = 0.53, p = 0.001, respectively). Both MaRIA and Clermont scores were significantly lower in patients with mucosal healing (LS < 135). The area under the curve (AUC) with both MR scores was moderate for prediction of any mucosal inflammation (LS ⩾ 135) and excellent for prediction of moderate-to-severe inflammation (LS ⩾ 790) (0.71 and 0.74 versus 0.93 and 0.91 for MaRIA and Clermont score, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Modest correlation between VCE- and MRE-based quantitative indices of inflammation in patients with quiescent SB CD was observed. Between-modality correlation was higher in patients with endoscopically severe disease. DW-MRE gauged by Clermont score was at least as accurate as contrast-enhanced MRE for quantification of SB inflammation.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Chronic inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) causes significant distress for patients and their families. Data assessing the need of these patients for support and sharing with their partners are scarce. The aim of this study was to assess patients' views regarding sharing of information with their partners. METHODS: Ambulatory IBD patients treated at the Chaim Sheba Medical Center between January 2011 and January 2013 were asked to complete an anonymous questionnaire. Patients who had a stable partner and completed more than 95% of the questionnaire were included. RESULTS: Of 134 patients who agreed to complete the questionnaire, 101 met the inclusion criteria, 53 were men (mean age 45±15 years), and 50% had academic education. Only 42% of patients reported that their partner accompanied them to the doctor. However, 93% shared health problems with their partner, 64% would have liked their partner to receive more medical information, and 70% would like their partner to be more involved. The majority (88%) believed that more partner involvement could help them deal better with the disease, and 70% thought that support groups for partners should be established. No association was found between patients' demographic data and their answers. Patients who felt that partner involvement could help them to deal with the disease tended to share medical information with their partners and wanted them to be more involved in health care decision-making (P<0.001). CONCLUSION: Most IBD patients in our study wanted their partner to be more involved with their health problems, and believed that greater partner involvement could help them deal better with their disease. Therefore, more attention should be focused on gaining better cooperation from patients' families.