RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Capnocytophaga canimorsus is a Gram-negative capnophilic rod and part of dogs/cats' normal oral flora. It can be transmitted by bites, scratches, or even by contact of saliva with injured skin. Asplenic patients and patients with alcohol abuse are at particular risk for fulminant C. canimorsus sepsis. However, also immunocompetent patients can have a severe or even fatal infection. This is the first case of a severe C. canimorsus infection in an immunocompromised host complicated by acute renal cortical necrosis with a "reverse rim sign" in contrast-enhanced computed tomography on hospital admission. CASE PRESENTATION: We report the case of a 44-year functionally asplenic patient after an allogeneic stem cell transplantation, who presented with septic shock after a minor dog bite injury 4 days prior. Because of abdominal complaints, epigastric pain with local peritonism, and radiological gallbladder wall thickening, an abdominal focus was suspected after the initial work-up. The patient underwent emergent open cholecystectomy, but the clinical suspicion of abdominal infection was not confirmed. Septic shock was further complicated by cardiomyopathy and disseminated intravascular coagulation. As a causative pathogen, C. canimorsus could be isolated. The clinical course was complicated by permanent hemodialysis and extensive acral necrosis requiring amputation of several fingers and both thighs. CONCLUSION: We present a severe case of a C. canimorsus infection in a functionally asplenic patient after a minor dog bite. The clinical course was complicated by septic shock, disseminated intravascular coagulation, and the need for multiple amputations. In addition, the rare form of acute renal failure - bilateral acute renal cortical necrosis - was visible as "reverse rim sign" on computed tomography scan. This case is an example of the potential disastrous consequences when omitting pre-emptive antibiotic therapy in wounds inflicted by cats and dogs, particularly in asplenic patients.
Asunto(s)
Mordeduras y Picaduras/complicaciones , Mordeduras y Picaduras/microbiología , Capnocytophaga , Infecciones por Bacterias Gramnegativas/complicaciones , Necrosis de la Corteza Renal/microbiología , Adulto , Amputación Quirúrgica , Animales , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Mordeduras y Picaduras/terapia , Capnocytophaga/aislamiento & purificación , Capnocytophaga/patogenicidad , Coagulación Intravascular Diseminada/microbiología , Coagulación Intravascular Diseminada/patología , Coagulación Intravascular Diseminada/terapia , Perros , Femenino , Infecciones por Bacterias Gramnegativas/patología , Infecciones por Bacterias Gramnegativas/terapia , Humanos , Huésped Inmunocomprometido , Infecciones Intraabdominales/etiología , Infecciones Intraabdominales/microbiología , Infecciones Intraabdominales/terapia , Necrosis de la Corteza Renal/etiología , Necrosis de la Corteza Renal/terapia , Choque Séptico/microbiología , Choque Séptico/terapia , SuizaRESUMEN
AIMS: To assess the do-not-resuscitate preferences of the general Swiss population and to identify predictors influencing decision-making. Methods: A nationwide web-based survey was conducted in Switzerland on a representative sample of the adult population. The primary endpoint was the preference for a "Do Not Resuscitate" order (DNR Code Status) vs. cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR Code Status) in a clinical case vignette of an out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Secondary endpoint were participants' own personal preferences for DNR. Results: 1138 subjects participated in the web-based survey, 1044 were included in the final analysis. Preference for DNR code status was found in 40.5% (n = 423) in the case vignette and in 20.3% (n = 209) when making a personal decision for themselves. Independent predictors for DNR Code Status for the case vignette were: Personal preferences for their own DNR Code Status (adjusted OR 2.44, 95%CI 1.67 to 3.55; p < 0.001), intubation following respiratory failure (adjusted OR 1.95, 95%CI 1.20 to 3.18; p = 0.007), time-period after which resuscitation should not be attempted (adjusted OR 0.91, 95%CI 0.89 to 0.93); p < 0.001), and estimated chance of survival in case of a cardiac arrest (adjusted OR per decile 0.91, 95%CI 0.84 to 0.99, p = 0.02; which was overestimated by all participants. Conclusions: Main predictors for a DNR Code Status were personal preferences and the overestimation of good neurological outcome after cardiac arrest. Overestimation of positive outcomes after cardiac arrest seems to influence patient opinion and should thus be addressed during code status discussions.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Gliderite®, one of the first stylets designed specifically to assist tracheal intubation with non-channeled curved blades video laryngoscopes, can cause injury. The S-Guide® is a new, malleable, intubating guide allowing oxygenation. Its soft tip is designed to prevent trauma. We aimed to compare the duration of tracheal intubation with S-Guide compared to Gliderite using a C-MAC® D-Blade® video laryngoscope in patients with simulated difficult airways. METHODS: We performed a single-blinded prospective randomized study, with 50 adult patients requiring orotracheal intubation under general anaestheesia in Lausanne University Hospital. A cervical collar was fitted around the patient's neck to simulate difficult intubation conditions. Exclusion criteria were American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) >3, BMI > 35 kg m2 , known or at risk of difficult intubation, and risk of aspiration of gastric content. We recorded T1: time of identification of the glottis; T2: time to inflate the cuff, and T3: total intubation time (capnography curve appearance). Secondary outcomes were the presence of arytenoid contact during intubation and postoperative airway discomfort. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between T1 and T2 (seconds) while using the S-Guide or Gliderite, respectively: 14.6 [9.6- 18.6] vs 16.5 [11.0-20.6]; P=.368 and 43.3 [33.2-49.3] vs 46.3 [35.6-61.5], P =.308. T3 was significantly shorter in the S-Guide group: 58.1 [50.2-61.8] vs 65.3 [57.6-78.7], P =.044. Fewer arytenoid contact occurred during intubation using the S-Guide (P =.032), without difference in postoperative airway discomfort. CONCLUSION: S-Guide-assisted tracheal intubation, with a C-MAC D-Blade in simulated difficult airways, allows successful and faster intubation than with the Gliderite Stylet.