PMCA inhibition reverses drug resistance in clinically refractory cancer patient-derived models.

BACKGROUND: Cancer cells have developed molecular strategies to cope with evolutionary stressors in the dynamic tumor microenvironment. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-γ coactivator-1α (PGC1α) is a metabolic rheostat that regulates diverse cellular adaptive behaviors, including growth and survival. However, the mechanistic role of PGC1α in regulating cancer cell viability under metabolic and genotoxic stress remains elusive. METHODS: We investigated the PGC1α-mediated survival mechanisms in metabolic stress (i.e., glucose deprivation-induced metabolic stress condition)-resistant cancer cells. We established glucose deprivation-induced metabolic stress-resistant cells (selected cells) from parental tumor cells and silenced or overexpressed PGC1α in selected and parental tumor cells. RESULTS: Several in vitro and in vivo mouse experiments were conducted to elucidate the contribution of PGC1α to cell viability in metabolic stress conditions. Interestingly, in the mouse xenograft model of patient-derived drug-resistant cancer cells, each group treated with an anti-cancer drug alone showed no drastic effects, whereas a group that was co-administered an anti-cancer drug and a specific PMCA inhibitor (caloxin or candidate 13) showed marked tumor shrinkage. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that PGC1α is a key regulator of anti-apoptosis in metabolic and genotoxic stress-resistant cells, inducing PMCA expression and allowing survival in glucose-deprived conditions. We have discovered a novel therapeutic target candidate that could be employed for the treatment of patients with refractory cancers.

Radiological criteria for selecting candidates for neoadjuvant chemotherapy for gastric cancer: an exploratory analysis from the PRODIGY study.

BACKGROUND: In this exploratory analysis from the PRODIGY study, we aimed to define the radiological criteria to identify patients with gastric cancer who may derive maximal clinical benefit from neoadjuvant chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: There were 246 patients allocated to receive surgery followed by adjuvant S-1 (SC group) and 238 allocated to receive neoadjuvant chemotherapy (CSC group). As the PRODIGY's radiological method of lymph node (LN) evaluation considers short diameter and morphology (the size and morphology method), a method considering only short diameter was also employed. In the SC group, the correlation between radiologic and pathologic findings was analyzed. The hazard ratio (HR) for the progression-free survival (PFS) of the CSC group was analyzed in subgroups with different cT/N stages. RESULTS: cT4 disease showed a sensitivity of 85.6% for detecting pT4 and had a low proportion of pathologic stage (pStage) I disease (4.5%). Among the criteria determined by different cT/N stages by each method of LN positivity, those involving cT4Nany or cT4N + by both methods had a minimal proportion of pStage I disease (≤ 5%), while cT4Nany by both methods and cT4N + by the size and morphology method exhibited ≥ 75.9% sensitivity for detecting pStage III disease. The relative risk reduction in PFS of the CSC group was greatest in patients meeting the cT4Nany criterion defined by both methods (HR 0.67, 95% confidence interval 0.48-0.93). CONCLUSIONS: The cT4Nany criterion, regardless of the radiological method used for LN evaluation, may help select patients with resectable gastric cancer for neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Determinants of clinical outcomes of gastric cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy: a sub-analysis of the PRODIGY study.

BACKGROUND: In this post hoc analysis of the PRODIGY study, we aimed to investigate factors associated with survival outcomes and provide evidence for designing optimal perioperative treatment strategies for gastric cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 212 patients in the neoadjuvant chemotherapy group of the PRODIGY study were included as the study population. The prognostic impact of clinicopathologic factors, including the initial radiological clinical stage (cStage) and post-neoadjuvant chemotherapy pathological stage (ypStage), was analyzed. RESULTS: The median age was 58 years. The majority of patients (77.4%) had cStage III disease, and about 10% and 25% had ypStage 0 and I disease, respectively. According to the initial cStage, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were significantly different (P < 0.01). PFS and OS were also different according to the ypStage (P < 0.01). In multivariate analyses, cStage IIIC disease (vs. cStage II) and ypStage II and III disease (vs. ypStage 0/I) were independent factors for poor survival outcomes. Based on the patterns of PFS and OS according to both cStage and ypStage, three patient groups were defined. These groups showed distinct PFS and OS (P < 0.01) with 5-year PFS rates of 95.7%, 77.9%, and 31.3% and 5-year OS rates of 95.7%, 82.4%, and 42.5%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Both initial cStage and ypStage were independent factors for survival outcomes of gastric cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Efforts should be made to develop optimal peri-operative treatment strategies for patients at different risks according to cStage and ypStage.

Serum glucose excretion after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a potential target for diabetes treatment.

OBJECTIVE: The mechanisms underlying type 2 diabetes resolution after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) are unclear. We suspected that glucose excretion may occur in the small bowel based on observations in humans. The aim of this study was to evaluate the mechanisms underlying serum glucose excretion in the small intestine and its contribution to glucose homeostasis after bariatric surgery. DESIGN: 2-Deoxy-2-[18F]-fluoro-D-glucose (FDG) was measured in RYGB-operated or sham-operated obese diabetic rats. Altered glucose metabolism was targeted and RNA sequencing was performed in areas of high or low FDG uptake in the ileum or common limb. Intestinal glucose metabolism and excretion were confirmed using 14C-glucose and FDG. Increased glucose metabolism was evaluated in IEC-18 cells and mouse intestinal organoids. Obese or ob/ob mice were treated with amphiregulin (AREG) to correlate intestinal glycolysis changes with changes in serum glucose homeostasis. RESULTS: The AREG/EGFR/mTOR/AKT/GLUT1 signal transduction pathway was activated in areas of increased glycolysis and intestinal glucose excretion in RYGB-operated rats. Intraluminal GLUT1 inhibitor administration offset improved glucose homeostasis in RYGB-operated rats. AREG-induced signal transduction pathway was confirmed using IEC-18 cells and mouse organoids, resulting in a greater capacity for glucose uptake via GLUT1 overexpression and sequestration in apical and basolateral membranes. Systemic and local AREG administration increased GLUT1 expression and small intestinal membrane translocation and prevented hyperglycaemic exacerbation. CONCLUSION: Bariatric surgery or AREG administration induces apical and basolateral membrane GLUT1 expression in the small intestinal enterocytes, resulting in increased serum glucose excretion in the gut lumen. Our findings suggest a novel, potentially targetable glucose homeostatic mechanism in the small intestine.

Microsatellite Instability and Effectiveness of Adjuvant Treatment in pT1N1 Gastric Cancer: A Multicohort Study.

BACKGROUND: Microsatellite status is a prognostic biomarker in advanced gastric cancer. This retrospective study aimed to investigate the usefulness of microsatellite status in predicting prognosis and response to adjuvant treatment in pT1N1 gastric cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Among 875 patients who underwent radical gastrectomy for pT1N1 gastric cancer at two tertiary hospitals, 838 with available microsatellite instability (MSI) data were included and classified into two groups according to microsatellite status: microsatellite stable (MSS) and MSI-high (MSI-H). Recurrence-free survival rate and risk factors for tumor recurrence were analyzed. RESULTS: Of 838 gastric cancer patients, 100 (11.9%) were MSI-H and 307 (36.6%) received adjuvant treatment. During median follow-up of 70 months, 42 (5.0%) patients experienced gastric cancer recurrence; hematogenous recurrences were the most common (45.2%). Recurrence-free survival was similar in the MSS and MSI-H groups (p = 0.27), and adjuvant treatment did not show an oncological benefit over surgery alone for pT1N1 gastric cancer (p = 0.53). On univariate analysis, age, operation period, and Lauren classification were significantly associated with tumor recurrence, while adjuvant treatment and MSI status were not associated with tumor recurrence. On multivariate analysis, MSI status was not associated with tumor recurrence, and adjuvant treatment worsened the tumor recurrence risk [hazard ratio (HR) 2.373, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.125-5.006, p = 0.023). CONCLUSION: MSI status may not be a prognostic factor for tumor recurrence or a predictor of response to adjuvant treatment in pT1N1 gastric cancer patients. Considering that the effect of adjuvant treatment to decrease the risk of tumor recurrence is not clear, it may not be indicated in pT1N1 patients.

Single patient classifier as a prognostic biomarker in pT1N1 gastric cancer: Results from two large Korean cohorts.

OBJECTIVE: Benefits of adjuvant treatment in pT1N1 gastric cancer (GC) remain controversial. Additionally, an effective biomarker for early GC is the need of the hour. The prognostic and predictive roles of single patient classifier (SPC) were validated in stage II/III GC. In this study, we aimed to elucidate the role of SPC as a biomarker for pT1N1 GC. METHODS: The present retrospective biomarker study (NCT03485105) enrolled patients treated for pT1N1 GC between 1996 and 2012 from two large hospitals (the Y cohort and S cohort). For SPC, mRNA expression of four classifier genes (GZMB, WARS, SFRP4 and CDX1) were evaluated by real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction assay. The SPC was revised targeting pT1 stages and the prognosis was stratified as high- and low-risk group by the expression of SFRP4, a representative epithelial-mesenchymal transition marker. RESULTS: SPC was evaluated in 875 patients (n=391 and 484 in the Y and S cohorts, respectively). Among 864 patients whose SPC result was available, 41 (4.7%) patients experience GC recurrence. According to revised SPC, 254 (29.4%) patients were classified as high risk [123 (31.5%) and 131 (27.1%) in the Y and S cohorts, respectively]. The high risk was related to frequent recurrence in both Y and S cohort (log-rank P=0.023, P<0.001, respectively), while there was no difference byGZMB and WARS expression. Multivariable analyses of the overall-cohort confirmed the high risk of revised SPC as a significant prognostic factor [hazard ratio (HR): 4.402 (2.293-8.449), P<0.001] of GC. A significant difference was not detected by SPC in the prognosis of patients in the presence and absence of adjuvant treatment (log-rank P=0.670). CONCLUSIONS: The present study revealed the revised SPC as a prognostic biomarker of pT1N1 GC and suggested the use of the revised SPC for early-stage GC as like stage II/III.

Stratification of Postsurgical Computed Tomography Surveillance Based on the Extragastric Recurrence of Early Gastric Cancer.

OBJECTIVE: To stratify the postsurgical computed tomography (CT) surveillance based on a risk-scoring system for predicting extragastric recurrence after surgical resection of early gastric cancer (EGC). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Postsurgical CT surveillance should not be routinely performed in all patients because of the low incidence of extragastric recurrence and potential risk of radiation exposure. METHODS: Data from 3162 patients who underwent surgical resection for EGC were reviewed to develop a risk-scoring system to predict extragastric recurrence. Risk scores were based on the predictive factors for extragastric recurrence, which were determined using Cox proportional hazard regression model. The risk-scoring system was validated by Uno censoring adjusted C-index. External validation was performed using an independent dataset (n = 430). RESULTS: The overall incidence of extragastric recurrence was 1.4% (44/3162). Five risk factors (lymph node metastasis, indications for endoscopic resection, male sex, positive lymphovascular invasion, and elevated macroscopic type), which were significantly associated with extragastric recurrence, were incorporated into the risk-scoring system, and the patients were categorized into 2 risk groups. The 10-year extragastric recurrence-free survival differed significantly between low- and high-risk groups (99.7% vs 96.5%; P < 0.001). The predictive accuracy of the risk-scoring system in the development cohort was 0.870 [Uno C-index; 95% confidence interval (95% CI), 0.800-0.939]. Discrimination was good after internal (0.859) and external validation (0.782, 0.549-1.000). CONCLUSION: This risk-scoring system might be useful to predict extragastric recurrence of EGC after curative surgical resection. We suggest that postsurgical CT surveillance to detect extragastric recurrence should be avoided in the low-risk group.

The Suggestion of Revised Criteria for Endoscopic Resection of Differentiated-Type Submucosal Gastric Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Early gastric cancer that meets the expanded criteria for endoscopic resection (ER) is expected to be associated with a negligible risk for lymph node metastasis (LNM); however, recent studies have reported LNM in submucosal gastric cancer patients who met the existing criteria. In this study, we develop the revised criteria for ER of submucosal gastric cancer with the aim of minimizing LNM. METHODS: We analyzed the clinicopathological data of 2461 patients diagnosed with differentiated, submucosal gastric cancer who underwent surgery at three tertiary hospitals between March 2001 and December 2012, and re-analyzed the pathological slides of all patients. The depth of submucosal invasion was measured histopathologically in two different ways (the classic and alternative methods) to obtain accurate data. RESULTS: Of the enrolled subjects, 306 (17.0%) had LNM. The width of submucosal invasion correlated well with the LNM. We defined the depth and width of submucosal infiltration associated with the lowest incidence of LNM. None of the 254 subjects developed LNM when the following criteria were met: tumor diameter ≤ 3 cm, submucosal invasion depth < 1000 µm (as measured using the alternative method), submucosal invasion width < 4 mm, no lymphovascular invasion, and no perineural invasion; however, LNM was observed in 2.7% of subjects (6/218) who met the existing criteria. CONCLUSIONS: We revised the criteria for ER by adopting the alternative method to measure the depth of submucosal invasion and adding the width of such invasion. Our criteria better predicted LNM than the current criteria used to select ER to treat submucosal gastric cancer.

Effect of histologic differences between biopsy and final resection on treatment outcomes in early gastric cancer.

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Biopsy-based histologic diagnosis is important in determining the treatment strategy for early gastric cancer (EGC). However, there are few studies on how histologic discrepancy may affect patients' treatment outcomes. We aimed to investigate the impact of histopathologic differences between biopsy and final specimens from endoscopic resection (ER) or gastrectomy on treatment outcomes in patients with EGC. We also examined the predictive factors of histologic discrepancy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We analyzed the data of 1851 patients with EGC treated with ER or gastrectomy. We compared the histology between biopsies and final resected specimens from ER or gastrectomy. We also examined changes in treatment outcomes according to histologic differences. RESULTS: Histologic discrepancy was observed in 11.9% of patients in the ER group and 10.7% of those in the gastrectomy group. In patients treated with ER who showed histologic discrepancy, 80.9% showed differentiated-type EGC (D-EGC) on biopsy but undifferentiated-type-EGC (UD-EGC) after ER, of which 78.9% were non-curative resection. In patients treated with gastrectomy who showed histologic discrepancy, 39% showed UD-EGC on biopsy but showed D-EGC after gastrectomy. A total of these patients had absolute and expanded indications for ER. Moderately differentiated and poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma on biopsy were predictive factors of histologic discrepancy in UD-EGC and D-EGC on final resection, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: About 10% of patients showed histologic discrepancy between biopsy and final resection with ER or gastrectomy. Histologic discrepancy can affect treatment outcomes, such as non-curative resection in ER or missing the opportunity for ER in gastrectomy.

Microsatellite Instability and Programmed Cell Death-Ligand 1 Expression in Stage II/III Gastric Cancer: Post Hoc Analysis of the CLASSIC Randomized Controlled study.

OBJECTIVE: We investigated microsatellite instability (MSI) status and programed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression as predictors of prognosis and responsiveness to chemotherapy for stage II/III gastric cancer. BACKGROUND: The clinical implications of MSI status and PD-L1 expression in gastric cancer have not been well-elucidated. METHODS: Tumor specimens and clinical information were collected from patients enrolled in the CLASSIC trial-a randomized controlled study of capecitabine plus oxaliplatin-based adjuvant chemotherapy. Five quasi-monomorphic mononucleotide markers were used to assess tumor MSI status. PD-L1 expressions of tumor and stromal immune cells were evaluated using immunohistochemistry. RESULTS: Of 592 patients, 40 (6.8%) had MSI-high (MSI-H) tumors. Among 582 patients available for immunohistochemistry evaluation, PD-L1 was positive in tumor cells (tPD-L1) of 16 patients (2.7%) and stromal immune cells (sPD-L1) of 165 patients (28.4%). Multivariable analysis of disease-free survival (DFS) showed that MSI-H and sPD-L1-positivity were independent prognostic factors [hazard ratio 0.301 (0.123-0.736), 0.714 (0.514-0.991); P = 0.008, 0.044), as were receiving chemotherapy, age, tumor grade, and TNM stage. Although adjuvant chemotherapy improved DFS in the microsatellite-stable (MSS) group (5-year DFS: 66.8% vs 54.1%; P = 0.002); no benefit was observed in the MSI-H group (5-year DFS: 83.9% vs 85.7%; P = 0.931). In the MSS group, sPD-L1-negative patients, but not sPD-L1-positive patients, had significant survival benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy compared with surgery only (5-year DFS: 66.1% vs 50.7%; P = 0.001). CONCLUSION: MSI status and PD-L1 expression are clinically actionable biomarkers for stratifying patients and predicting benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy after D2 gastrectomy for stage II/III gastric cancer.

Mismatch Repair Status of Gastric Cancer and Its Association with the Local and Systemic Immune Response.

BACKGROUND: Microsatellite instability (MSI)-high (MSI-H) colorectal cancer is known to be associated with increased tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs), elevated host systemic immune response, and a favorable prognosis. In gastric cancer, however, MSI status has rarely been evaluated in the context of TILs and systemic immune response. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We evaluated data for 345 patients with gastric cancer who underwent gastrectomy with MSI typing. The numbers of TILs were counted after immunohistochemical staining with anti-CD3, CD4, CD8, forkhead box P3 (Foxp3), and granzyme B to quantify the subsets of TILs. To evaluate the systemic immune response, the differential white blood cell count and prognostic nutritional index (PNI) were obtained. RESULTS: Of the 345 patients, 57 demonstrated MSI-H tumors and 288 demonstrated non-MSI-H tumors. MSI-H tumors carried significantly higher densities of CD8+ T cells, Foxp3+ T cells, and granzyme B+ T cells and a higher ratio of Foxp3/CD4 and granzyme B/CD8. The prognostic impact of TILs differed between patients with MSI-H tumors and those with non-MSI-H tumors. The TIL subsets were not found to be significant prognostic factors for recurrence-free survival (RFS) or overall survival (OS) in the MSI-H tumor group. In the non-MSI-H tumor group, multivariate analysis showed that stage, PNI, and CD4+ T cells were independent prognostic factors for RFS, and stage, PNI, and the Foxp3/CD4 ratio were independent prognostic factors for OS. CONCLUSIONS: The association between systemic/local immune response and prognosis differed according to MSI status. Different tumor characteristics and prognoses according to MSI status could be associated with the immunogenicity caused by microsatellite instability and subsequent host immune response. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: This study demonstrates that the density of each subset of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) differed between microsatellite instability (MSI)-high and non-MSI-high tumors. Moreover, the prognostic effect of the preoperative systemic immune response status and TILs differed between the MSI-high (MSI-H) and non-MSI-H tumor groups. The present study may help to identify the mechanisms of cancer progression and develop treatment strategies for MSI-high gastric cancer.

Differences in the Efficacies of Pazopanib and Gemcitabine/Docetaxel as Second-Line Treatments for Metastatic Soft Tissue Sarcoma.

BACKGROUND: We retrospectively investigated the treatment outcomes of second-line treatment with pazopanib or gemcitabine/docetaxel in patients with advanced soft tissue sarcoma (STS). METHODS: Ninety-one patients who were treated with pazopanib or gemcitabine/docetaxel for advanced STS between 1995 and 2015 were analyzed. RESULTS: Forty-six and 45 patients received pazopanib and gemcitabine/docetaxel, respectively. The median progression-free survival for the group treated with pazopanib was 4.5 months compared with 3.0 months for the gemcitabine/docetaxel group (p = 0.593). The median overall survival for the group treated with pazopanib was 12.6 months compared with 14.2 months for the gemcitabine/docetaxel group (p = 0.362). The overall response rates (ORRs) were 6.5 and 26.7% in the pazopanib and gemcitabine/docetaxel groups, respectively. The following parameters had ORRs favoring gemcitabine/docetaxel: age ≥50 years (31.6 vs. 2.9%, p = 0.006), histologic grade 1-2 (40.9 vs. 0%, p = 0.001), and poor first-line treatment response (23.3 vs. 3.0%, p = 0.022). Gemcitabine/docetaxel was associated with better ORRs for the following histologic subtypes: leiomyosarcoma (p = 0.624), malignant fibrous histiocytoma/undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma (p = 0.055), and angiosarcoma (p = 0.182). However, the ORR of synovial sarcoma favored pazopanib (p = 0.99). CONCLUSIONS: The efficacies of pazopanib and gemcitabine/docetaxel as second-line treatments after doxorubicin or ifosfamide failure differed among clinical and histologic subgroups and appeared to facilitate a more personalized treatment approach for advanced STS.

Multi-institutional validation of the 8th AJCC TNM staging system for gastric cancer: Analysis of survival data from high-volume Eastern centers and the SEER database.

BACKGROUND: The clinical relevance and general applicability of the 8th American Joint Committee on Cancer TNM gastric cancer staging system vs the 7th version have not been examined using datasets from both the East and West. METHODS: Patients (n = 29 984) treated for gastric adenocarcinoma at two high-volume centers (Severance Hospital [SH] and Gangnam Severance Hospital [GSH]) in Korea and data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database were retrospectively analyzed. Survival curves, the performance of tumor staging, and the homogeneity of modified subgroups were compared. RESULTS: Minute changes were noted in the stage IIB subgroup; most changes were noted in stage III. Applying the 8th staging system facilitated better prediction of survival than applying the 7th version for SH data according to the log-rank test, C-index, and AIC (8444.5 vs 9263.8, 0.796 vs 0.798, and 104152 vs 103909, respectively). Its performance was also superior for GSH and SEER data. In a subgroup analysis of stages IIB to IIIC in SH, GSH, and SEER data, the 8th staging system showed similar or more homogeneous survival for each sub-classification than the 7th version. CONCLUSION: Compared with the 7th gastric cancer staging system, the newer version more accurately predicted prognosis and stratified subgroups more homogeneously.

The clinical implications of FDG-PET/CT differ according to histology in advanced gastric cancer.

BACKGROUND: The prognostic impact of preoperative 18F-FDG PET/CT in advanced gastric cancer (AGC) remains a matter of debate. This study aims to evaluate the prognostic impact of SUVmax in preoperative 18F-FDG PET/CT of AGC according to histologic subtype, with a focus on the differences between tubular adenocarcinoma and signet ring cell (SRC) carcinoma. METHODS: As a discovery set, a total of 727 AGC patients from prospective database were analyzed according to histologic subtype with Cox proportional hazard model and p-spline curves. In addition, another 173 patients from an independent institution was assessed as an external validation set. RESULTS: In multivariate analysis, high SUVmax in preoperative 18F-FDG PET/CT of AGC was negatively correlated with disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients with diffuse type (DFS: HR 2.17, P < 0.001; OS: HR 2.47, P < 0.001) or SRC histology (DFS: HR 2.26, P = 0.005; OS: HR 2.61, P = 0.003). This negative prognostic impact was not observed in patients with intestinal type or well or moderately differentiated histology. These findings have been consistently confirmed in a validation set. The p-spline curves also showed a gradual increase in log HR as SUVmax rises only for SRC histology and for diffuse-type AGC. Finally, a novel predictive model for recurrence of AGC with diffuse type or SRC histology was generated and validated based on the preoperative SUVmax. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative high SUVmax of AGC is a poor prognostic factor in those with diffuse type or SRC histology. This study is the first to demonstrate the differential prognostic impact of preoperative PET/CT SUVmax in AGC according to histologic subtype and provide a clue to explain previous discrepancies in the prognostic impact of preoperative PET/CT in AGC. Prospective studies are required to validate the role of preoperative SUVmax in AGC.

Role of probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy-targeted biopsy in the molecular and histopathological study of gastric cancer.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: A high yield of biopsy is mandatory to perform molecular genetic research with endoscopically obtained gastric cancer tissues. We evaluated whether probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy (pCLE) can increase the yield of endoscopic biopsy for gastric cancer compared with white light endoscopy (WLE). METHODS: All lesions in the pCLE and WLE groups were initially evaluated through WLE. In the pCLE group, lesions were further examined through pCLE. In the pilot study, five and three biopsy specimens were obtained for histopathological examination and tumor marker analysis, respectively. In the confirmatory study, six biopsy specimens for histopathological evaluation were obtained. RESULTS: A total of 30 gastric cancers and 61 undifferentiated-type gastric cancers were analyzed in the pilot and confirmatory studies, respectively. The proportion of cancer cells in biopsy samples of poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma or signet ring cell carcinoma was higher in the pCLE group than in the WLE group in both the pilot and confirmatory studies (pilot: median proportion, 65% vs 30%, P = 0.010; confirmatory: mean ± standard deviation, 49.5 ± 29.3 vs 29.3 ± 13.7, P = 0.002). The expression ratio of tumor markers including carcinoembryonic antigen, GW112, HOX transcript antisense RNA, and H19 tended to be higher in the pCLE group than in the WLE group. CONCLUSION: Probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy-targeted biopsy provided superior results in terms of the proportion of cancer cells in biopsy samples compared with WLE-targeted biopsy in gastric cancer with undifferentiated histology.

Similar hematologic and nutritional outcomes after proximal gastrectomy with double-tract reconstruction in comparison to total gastrectomy for early upper gastric cancer.

BACKGROUND: Proximal gastrectomy offers theoretical benefits over total gastrectomy in terms of hematologic and nutritional outcomes. However, little evidence confirming these benefits has been reported. The aim of this study was to assess the hematologic and nutritional outcomes of proximal gastrectomy with double-tract reconstruction in comparison to those of total gastrectomy. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed data from 80 patients with stage I gastric cancer who underwent proximal gastrectomy with double-tract reconstruction (n = 38) or total gastrectomy (n = 42) from September 2014 to December 2015. We compared hematologic (including hemoglobin, ferritin, vitamin B12, etc.) and nutritional outcomes [including body mass index (BMI), serum total protein, albumin, total cholesterol, and total lymphocyte count] between the two groups. RESULTS: We found no significant differences in changes in hemoglobin (P = 0.250) or cumulative incidence of iron deficiency anemia (P = 0.971) during a median follow-up period of 24 months (range 18-30 months) after surgery. Cumulative incidence of vitamin B12 deficiency also did not differ significantly between the proximal and total gastrectomy groups (P = 0.087). BMI changes from baseline were not significantly different between the two groups (P = 0.591). Likewise, there were no statistically significant differences in nutritional outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Proximal gastrectomy with double-tract reconstruction exhibited similar outcomes in terms of hematologic and nutritional features in comparison to total gastrectomy.

A case of gastric cancer metastasis to the breast in a female with BRCA2 germline mutation and literature review.

INTRODUCTION: Gastric cancer is a deadly disease. Common sites of distant metastasis of gastric cancer are the peritoneum, liver, lymph nodes, and lung. The breast is a rare site of metastasis in gastric cancer which occurs in males dominantly. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Here, we report the first case of metastatic gastric cancer to the breast in a patient with the breast cancer 2 (BRCA2) germline mutation. A 34-year-old female was admitted to the hospital with dyspepsia and a palpable mass in the left breast. Gastric cancer was confirmed to be signet ring cell adenocarcinoma. The breast mass exhibited histological properties consistent with gastric cancer. Immunohistochemistry results showed the breast tumor was CDX-2 and CK20-positive, but ER-, CK7-, and GATA3-negative. The BRCA1 gene had a wild-type sequence, but a heterozygous variant was discovered in BRCA2 in exon 10 (c.1744A > C, p.T582P); the significance of this variant is unknown. RESULTS: The patient received palliative XELOX (capecitabine + oxaliplatin) with radiation therapy to the stomach. The breast tumor resolved completely, but the overall response was partial. CONCLUSION: Gastric cancer metastasis to the breast is rare, but should be considered in young female patients with signet ring cell type gastric cancer.

Predictive test for chemotherapy response in resectable gastric cancer: a multi-cohort, retrospective analysis.

BACKGROUND: Adjuvant chemotherapy after surgery improves survival of patients with stage II-III, resectable gastric cancer. However, the overall survival benefit observed after adjuvant chemotherapy is moderate, suggesting that not all patients with resectable gastric cancer treated with adjuvant chemotherapy benefit from it. We aimed to develop and validate a predictive test for adjuvant chemotherapy response in patients with resectable, stage II-III gastric cancer. METHODS: In this multi-cohort, retrospective study, we developed through a multi-step strategy a predictive test consisting of two rule-based classifier algorithms with predictive value for adjuvant chemotherapy response and prognosis. Exploratory bioinformatics analyses identified biologically relevant candidate genes in gastric cancer transcriptome datasets. In the discovery analysis, a four-gene, real-time RT-PCR assay was developed and analytically validated in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tumour tissues from an internal cohort of 307 patients with stage II-III gastric cancer treated at the Yonsei Cancer Center with D2 gastrectomy plus adjuvant fluorouracil-based chemotherapy (n=193) or surgery alone (n=114). The same internal cohort was used to evaluate the prognostic and chemotherapy response predictive value of the single patient classifier genes using associations with 5-year overall survival. The results were validated with a subset (n=625) of FFPE tumour samples from an independent cohort of patients treated in the CLASSIC trial (NCT00411229), who received D2 gastrectomy plus capecitabine and oxaliplatin chemotherapy (n=323) or surgery alone (n=302). The primary endpoint was 5-year overall survival. FINDINGS: We identified four classifier genes related to relevant gastric cancer features (GZMB, WARS, SFRP4, and CDX1) that formed the single patient classifier assay. In the validation cohort, the prognostic single patient classifier (based on the expression of GZMB, WARS, and SFRP4) identified 79 (13%) of 625 patients as low risk, 296 (47%) as intermediate risk, and 250 (40%) as high risk, and 5-year overall survival for these groups was 83·2% (95% CI 75·2-92·0), 74·8% (69·9-80·1), and 66·0% (60·1-72·4), respectively (p=0·012). The predictive single patient classifier (based on the expression of GZMB, WARS, and CDX1) assigned 281 (45%) of 625 patients in the validation cohort to the chemotherapy-benefit group and 344 (55%) to the no-benefit group. In the predicted chemotherapy-benefit group, 5-year overall survival was significantly improved in those patients who had received adjuvant chemotherapy after surgery compared with those who received surgery only (80% [95% CI 73·5-87·1] vs 64·5% [56·8-73·3]; univariate hazard ratio 0·47 [95% CI 0·30-0·75], p=0·0015), whereas no such improvement in 5-year overall survival was observed in the no-benefit group (72·9% [66·5-79·9] in patients who received chemotherapy plus surgery vs 72·5% [65·8-79·9] in patients who only had surgery; 0·93 [0·62-1·38], p=0·71). The predictive single patient classifier groups (chemotherapy benefit vs no-benefit) could predict adjuvant chemotherapy benefit in terms of 5-year overall survival in the validation cohort (pinteraction=0·036 in univariate analysis). Similar results were obtained in the internal evaluation cohort. INTERPRETATION: The single patient classifiers validated in this study provide clinically important prognostic information independent of standard risk-stratification methods and predicted chemotherapy response after surgery in two independent cohorts of patients with resectable, stage II-III gastric cancer. The single patient classifiers could complement TNM staging to optimise decision making in patients with resectable gastric cancer who are eligible for adjuvant chemotherapy after surgery. Further validation of these results in prospective studies is warranted. FUNDING: Ministry of ICT and Future Planning; Ministry of Trade, Industry, and Energy; and Ministry of Health and Welfare.

Parameters for Predicting Surgical Outcomes for Gastric Cancer Patients: Simple Is Better Than Complex.

BACKGROUND: Various parameters are used to predict perioperative surgical outcomes. However, no comprehensive studies in gastrectomy have been conducted. This study aimed to compare the performance of each parameter in patients with gastric cancer. METHODS: The medical records of 1032 gastric cancer patients who underwent curative gastrectomy between 2009 and 2015 were reviewed. Laboratory values and associated parameters (neutrophil count, lymphocyte count, platelet count, albumin level, Prognostic Nutritional Index, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio, and Systemic Immune-Inflammation Index) as well as body weight-related data and associated parameters [body mass index (BMI), percentage of weight loss, Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 assessment, the Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool, and the Nutritional Risk Index] were measured and calculated. The study end points were major complications, operative mortality, prolonged hospital stay, overall survival (OS), and recurrence-free survival (RFS). RESULTS: Multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that male gender, total gastrectomy, advanced-stage gastric cancer, and low albumin level were risk factors for major complications. Old age, total gastrectomy, advanced-stage cancer, and high BMI were risk factors for operative mortality. Old age, open approach, and total gastrectomy were risk factors for prolonged hospital stay. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards models showed that old age, total gastrectomy, advanced-stage cancer, and high neutrophil count were unfavorable risk factors for OS. Old age, advanced-stage cancer, high neutrophil count, and high BMI were unfavorable risk factors for RFS. CONCLUSIONS: Albumin level, BMI, and neutrophil count are the most useful parameters for predicting short- and long-term surgical outcomes. Compared with complex parameters, simple-to-measure parameters are better for predicting surgical outcomes for gastric cancer patients.

Marked Loss of Muscle, Visceral Fat, or Subcutaneous Fat After Gastrectomy Predicts Poor Survival in Advanced Gastric Cancer: Single-Center Study from the CLASSIC Trial.

BACKGROUND: There is increasing interest in the influence of body composition on oncological outcomes. We evaluated the role of skeletal muscle and fat among patients with gastric cancer (GC) who underwent gastrectomy with or without adjuvant chemotherapy, as well as those changes' associations with survival outcomes. METHODS: The present study evaluated 136 patients with GC who were enrolled in the CLASSIC Trial at Yonsei Cancer Center. Baseline body compositions including skeletal muscle area, Hounsfield units (HU), visceral fat area, and subcutaneous fat area were measured by preoperative computed tomography (CT). CT before and after the gastrectomy were used to determine the 6-month relative changes in body composition parameters. Continuous variables were dichotomized according to the best cutoff values by Contal and O'Quigley method. RESULTS: Seventy-three patients (53.7%) underwent surgery alone, and 63 patients (46.3%) underwent surgery followed by adjuvant chemotherapy. The baseline body composition parameters were not associated with disease-free survival (DFS) or overall survival (OS). Except for the HU, the marked loss of muscle, visceral fat, or subcutaneous fat significantly predicted shorter DFS and OS. Patients with a marked loss in at least one significant body composition parameter had significantly shorter DFS (hazard ratio 2.9, 95% confidence interval 1.7-4.8, P < 0.001) and OS (hazard ratio 2.9, 95% confidence interval 1.7-5.0, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Marked loss in body composition parameters significantly predicted shorter DFS and OS among patients with GC who underwent gastrectomy. Postoperative nutrition and active healthcare interventions could improve the prognosis of these GC patients.