Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
1.
J Magn Reson Imaging ; 49(2): 400-410, 2019 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30306701

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Semiquantitative assessment of MRI plays a central role in musculoskeletal research; however, in the clinical setting MRI reports often tend to be subjective and qualitative. Grading schemes utilized in research are not used because they are extraordinarily time-consuming and unfeasible in clinical practice. PURPOSE: To evaluate the ability of deep-learning models to detect and stage severity of meniscus and patellofemoral cartilage lesions in osteoarthritis and anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) subjects. STUDY TYPE: Retrospective study aimed to evaluate a technical development. POPULATION: In all, 1478 MRI studies, including subjects at various stages of osteoarthritis and after ACL injury and reconstruction. FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE: 3T MRI, 3D FSE CUBE. ASSESSMENT: Automatic segmentation of cartilage and meniscus using 2D U-Net, automatic detection, and severity staging of meniscus and cartilage lesion with a 3D convolutional neural network (3D-CNN). STATISTICAL TESTS: Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, specificity and sensitivity, and class accuracy. RESULTS: Sensitivity of 89.81% and specificity of 81.98% for meniscus lesion detection and sensitivity of 80.0% and specificity of 80.27% for cartilage were achieved. The best performances for staging lesion severity were obtained by including demographics factors, achieving accuracies of 80.74%, 78.02%, and 75.00% for normal, small, and complex large lesions, respectively. DATA CONCLUSION: In this study we provide a proof of concept of a fully automated deep-learning pipeline that can identify the presence of meniscal and patellar cartilage lesions. This pipeline has also shown potential in making more in-depth examinations of lesion subjects for multiclass prediction and severity staging. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2 Technical Efficacy: Stage 2 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2019;49:400-410.


Asunto(s)
Ligamento Cruzado Anterior/diagnóstico por imagen , Cartílago Articular/diagnóstico por imagen , Imagenología Tridimensional , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Menisco/diagnóstico por imagen , Redes Neurales de la Computación , Osteoartritis de la Rodilla/diagnóstico por imagen , Adulto , Anciano , Lesiones del Ligamento Cruzado Anterior/patología , Reconstrucción del Ligamento Cruzado Anterior , Reacciones Falso Positivas , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Curva ROC , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Estudios Retrospectivos , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad
2.
J Digit Imaging ; 32(3): 471-477, 2019 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30306418

RESUMEN

Osteoarthritis (OA) classification in the knee is most commonly done with radiographs using the 0-4 Kellgren Lawrence (KL) grading system where 0 is normal, 1 shows doubtful signs of OA, 2 is mild OA, 3 is moderate OA, and 4 is severe OA. KL grading is widely used for clinical assessment and diagnosis of OA, usually on a high volume of radiographs, making its automation highly relevant. We propose a fully automated algorithm for the detection of OA using KL gradings with a state-of-the-art neural network. Four thousand four hundred ninety bilateral PA fixed-flexion knee radiographs were collected from the Osteoarthritis Initiative dataset (age = 61.2 ± 9.2 years, BMI = 32.8 ± 15.9 kg/m2, 42/58 male/female split) for six different time points. The left and right knee joints were localized using a U-net model. These localized images were used to train an ensemble of DenseNet neural network architectures for the prediction of OA severity. This ensemble of DenseNets' testing sensitivity rates of no OA, mild, moderate, and severe OA were 83.7, 70.2, 68.9, and 86.0% respectively. The corresponding specificity rates were 86.1, 83.8, 97.1, and 99.1%. Using saliency maps, we confirmed that the neural networks producing these results were in fact selecting the correct osteoarthritic features used in detection. These results suggest the use of our automatic classifier to assist radiologists in making more accurate and precise diagnosis with the increasing volume of radiographic image being taken in clinic.


Asunto(s)
Redes Neurales de la Computación , Osteoartritis de la Rodilla/diagnóstico por imagen , Algoritmos , Automatización , Conjuntos de Datos como Asunto , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad
3.
Radiology ; 288(1): 177-185, 2018 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29584598

RESUMEN

Purpose To analyze how automatic segmentation translates in accuracy and precision to morphology and relaxometry compared with manual segmentation and increases the speed and accuracy of the work flow that uses quantitative magnetic resonance (MR) imaging to study knee degenerative diseases such as osteoarthritis (OA). Materials and Methods This retrospective study involved the analysis of 638 MR imaging volumes from two data cohorts acquired at 3.0 T: (a) spoiled gradient-recalled acquisition in the steady state T1ρ-weighted images and (b) three-dimensional (3D) double-echo steady-state (DESS) images. A deep learning model based on the U-Net convolutional network architecture was developed to perform automatic segmentation. Cartilage and meniscus compartments were manually segmented by skilled technicians and radiologists for comparison. Performance of the automatic segmentation was evaluated on Dice coefficient overlap with the manual segmentation, as well as by the automatic segmentations' ability to quantify, in a longitudinally repeatable way, relaxometry and morphology. Results The models produced strong Dice coefficients, particularly for 3D-DESS images, ranging between 0.770 and 0.878 in the cartilage compartments to 0.809 and 0.753 for the lateral meniscus and medial meniscus, respectively. The models averaged 5 seconds to generate the automatic segmentations. Average correlations between manual and automatic quantification of T1ρ and T2 values were 0.8233 and 0.8603, respectively, and 0.9349 and 0.9384 for volume and thickness, respectively. Longitudinal precision of the automatic method was comparable with that of the manual one. Conclusion U-Net demonstrates efficacy and precision in quickly generating accurate segmentations that can be used to extract relaxation times and morphologic characterization and values that can be used in the monitoring and diagnosis of OA. © RSNA, 2018 Online supplemental material is available for this article.


Asunto(s)
Cartílago Articular/diagnóstico por imagen , Procesamiento de Imagen Asistido por Computador/métodos , Artropatías/diagnóstico por imagen , Articulación de la Rodilla/diagnóstico por imagen , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética/métodos , Redes Neurales de la Computación , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Menisco/diagnóstico por imagen , Persona de Mediana Edad , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Estudios Retrospectivos , Adulto Joven
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA