Ultrasound-guided genicular nerves block: an analgesic alternative to local infiltration analgesia for total knee arthroplasty: A noninferiority, matched cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Standard analgesic strategies for total knee arthroplasty employ local infiltration analgesia. Blockade and radiofrequency ablation of the genicular nerves are effective treatments for patients with chronic pain because of knee osteoarthritis. OBJECTIVE: To test the noninferiority of the analgesic effect of genicular nerves block in comparison with local infiltration analgesia after 24 h of total knee arthroplasty. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING: Perioperative setting. PATIENTS: Thirty-five patients scheduled for total knee arthroplasty were prospectively included in the study and compared with 35 patients in a retrospective cohort. INTERVENTION: Genicular nerve blocks in the prospective cohort were compared with local infiltration analgesia in the retrospective cohort. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The pain numeric rating scale and the cumulative opioid consumption in oral morphine equivalents during the first 24 h. RESULTS: We conducted propensity score-matched analyses of patients using acute postoperative pain-related risk covariates. After one-to-one propensity score matching, 21 patients were included in the local infiltration analgesia group and 21 in the genicular nerve block group. The median difference in numeric rating score at rest at 24 h was -0.99 [95% confidence interval (CI), -1.99 to 0.5, P = 0.012] on the unmatched cohort and -1.9 (95% CI, -2 to 0, P = 0.002) on the matched cohort (meeting the noninferiority criteria, Δ=1). The median difference in cumulative opioid consumption was 2.5 mg (95% CI, -13.5 to 2.5, P < 0.001) for the unmatched cohort and 4.99 mg (95% CI, -11.5 to 2.5, P < 0.001) on the matched group (meeting the noninferiority criteria, Δ = 21 mg). CONCLUSION: Local infiltration analgesia and genicular nerve block are comparable in terms of analgesic results. Therefore, genicular nerves block is an alternative to local infiltration analgesia in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT04024319.

Effectiveness of patient empowerment over stress related to knee arthroplasty surgery.

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to show evidence of the Empowerment Session's effectiveness through measurements of surgery related emotional stress before and after this session. METHOD: The study was performed on 41 patients with knee arthroplasty surgery prescription by measuring the evolution of their emotional stress generated by surgery expectative, during the empowerment session. Two sets of measurements per patient were performed, before and after the empowerment session. Each set consisted of recording an electrocardiogram for 10min while the patients were seated and then applying two standard psychometric tests: State-Trait Anxiety Inventory test and Visual Analog Stress test. Differences in emotional stress were analyzed using psychometric tests and heart rate variability (HRV) analysis as stress biomarkers. RESULTS: Psychometric stress measurement shows a 17.8% reduction in stress according to the total stress scale value, and a 41.9% reduction in stress between test results before and after the session. Mean heart rate values increased by 7.4% with respect to the initial values, very low frequency power and total power also change in value suggesting more sympathetic and less parasympathetic activity. CONCLUSIONS: Both psychological and physiological measurements suggest the effectiveness of the empowerment session due to a significant increase in the wellness state of patients. Additionally, the correlation between psychometric tests and HRV indices demonstrates that both emotional stress indicators could be used as feedback on the empowerment sessions or as a reference to enhance surgical outcomes.

Effectiveness of patient empowerment over stress related to knee arthroplasty surgery / Efectividad del empoderamiento del paciente sobre el estrés relacionado con la cirugía de artroplastia de rodilla

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to show evidence of the Empowerment Session's effectiveness through measurements of surgery related emotional stress before and after this session. Method: The study was performed on 41 patients with knee arthroplasty surgery prescription by measuring the evolution of their emotional stress generated by surgery expectative, during the empowerment session. Two sets of measurements per patient were performed, before and after the empowerment session. Each set consisted of recording an electrocardiogram for 10min while the patients were seated and then applying two standard psychometric tests: State-Trait Anxiety Inventory test and Visual Analog Stress test. Differences in emotional stress were analyzed using psychometric tests and heart rate variability (HRV) analysis as stress biomarkers. RESULTS: Psychometric stress measurement shows a 17.8% reduction in stress according to the total stress scale value, and a 41.9% reduction in stress between test results before and after the session. Mean heart rate values increased by 7.4% with respect to the initial values, very low frequency power and total power also change in value suggesting more sympathetic and less parasympathetic activity. CONCLUSIONS: Both psychological and physiological measurements suggest the effectiveness of the empowerment session due to a significant increase in the wellness state of PATIENTS: Additionally, the correlation between psychometric tests and HRV indices demonstrates that both emotional stress indicators could be used as feedback on the empowerment sessions or as a reference to enhance surgical outcomes

OBJETIVO: Este estudio tiene como objetivo dar evidencias de la eficacia de la sesión de empoderamiento a través de mediciones del estrés emocional relacionado con la cirugía antes y después de esta sesión. MÉTODO: El estudio se realizó en 41 pacientes con prescripción de cirugía de artroplastia de rodilla durante la sesión de empoderamiento. Se realizaron 2 conjuntos de medidas por paciente, antes y después de la sesión. Cada conjunto consistió en registrar el electrocardiograma durante 10min mientras los pacientes estaban sentados y luego aplicando 2 test psicométricos estándar: test State-Trait Anxiety Inventory y escala análoga visual. Las diferencias en el estrés emocional se analizaron mediante test psicométricos y el análisis de la variabilidad del ritmo cardíaco (HRV) como biomarcadores de estrés. RESULTADOS: Los puntajes en los test psicométricos muestran una reducción del 17,8% en el estrés según el valor de la escala de estrés total, y una reducción del 41,9% en el estrés entre los resultados de las pruebas antes y después de la sesión. Los valores medios de ritmo cardíaco aumentaron un 7,4%. Las variaciones en la potencia ultra baja frecuencia y la potencia total sugieren una mayor actividad simpática y menor parasimpática. CONCLUSIONES: Tanto las mediciones psicológicas como fisiológicas sugieren la efectividad de la sesión de empoderamiento debido a un aumento significativo en el estado de bienestar de los pacientes. Además, la correlación entre las pruebas psicométricas y los índices de HRV demuestra que ambos indicadores de estrés emocional podrían utilizarse como retroalimentación en las sesiones de empoderamiento o como una referencia para mejorar los resultados quirúrgicos