Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 7 de 7
Filtrar
1.
Tumori ; 81(1): 48-51, 1995.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-7754542

RESUMEN

AIM AND BACKGROUND: The aim of this Phase II trial was to verify the therapeutic activity and tolerability of chemotherapy with lonidamine (LND) plus cyclophosphamide (CTX) in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in the elderly. The rationale of the combination is reported. CTX showed mild toxicity, with a 12% objective response (OR) in monochemotherapy; LND potentiated the in vitro antiproliferative activity of alkylating agents, mainly CTX, without increasing myelotoxicity, particularly important in the elderly. METHODS: The schedule consisted of CTX, 600 mg/m2/i.v. on day 1 every 21 days for 6 cycles; LND, 450 mg/die/p.o. from day 1 to progression. RESULTS: Between November 1990 and April 1991, 41 patients with stage III-IV NSCLC were enrolled; 35 were assessable for response. Median age was 73 years (range, 71-79 years); 13 patients (32%) presented stage III A, 20 (49%) stage III b, and 8 (19%) stage IV disease. Cardiovascular conditions and/or chronic respiratory failure contraindicated surgical treatment in stage III A patients. Of enrolled patients, 14.6% experienced PR, 48.8% SD and 14.6% dropped out of the study. Median time to progression was 4 months (range, 2-9 months) and median survival 9 months (range 3-45 months). No patient showed WHO grade IV LND-related toxicity. In 1 patient (2.5%), LND was discontinued after 5 therapy cycles due to WHO grade III myalgia; in 80% of patients, LND oral dosage was reduced to 300 mg/day due to WHO grade II myalgia, and 20% of patients completed treatment with the full dose. CONCLUSIONS: CTX plus LND can be considered a well tolerated therapeutic approach in the elderly with NSCLC with good PS and good liver, renal and cardiac conditions, but 14.6% PR is a slightly better result as compared with 12% PR obtainable with CTX alone as reported in the literature, even though most patients presented with advanced disease and no specific toxic effect was observed. Therefore, a confirmatory randomized trial (CTX vs CTS plus LND) would hardly be useful.


Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Pulmonares/tratamiento farmacológico , Anciano , Antineoplásicos/administración & dosificación , Antineoplásicos/efectos adversos , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Ciclofosfamida/administración & dosificación , Ciclofosfamida/efectos adversos , Femenino , Humanos , Indazoles/administración & dosificación , Indazoles/efectos adversos , Masculino
2.
Tumori ; 85(4): 239-42, 1999.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10587024

RESUMEN

AIMS AND BACKGROUND: The polychemotherapeutic regimen PEV (cisplatin, epidoxorubicin and vindesine) + lonidamine proved to be valid in terms of activity and efficacy in the treatment of patients with advanced, previously untreated non-small cell lung carcinoma. The goal of the study was to verify whether a different dose of lonidamine, together with an increase in cisplatin and epidoxorubicin compared to the standard regimen, is able to improve the activity and efficacy of PEV without increasing toxicity. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-one patients were treated with cisplatin (80 mg/m2/i.v.), epidoxorubicin (70 mg/m2/i.v.) and vindesine (3 mg/m2/i.v.) every 28 days for 6 courses in combination with lonidamine (600 mg/day on days 1 and 2 of each course followed by 450 mg/day until progression of disease or intolerance). All the patients were monitored for clinical response, median duration of response and survival and for toxicity. RESULTS: The clinical response in the 29 assessable patients was: 41.4% partial remission, 48.3% stable disease, and 10.3% progression of disease. The median duration of response was 8.5 months (range, 4-26+) and median survival was 12 months (range, 4-26+). Survival was above the median in 15 stage IIIb patients, and 2 patients were long survivors at 26+ months. The toxicity of PEV + lonidamine was mild; there were no toxic deaths nor acute toxicity of grade 4 according to the WHO scoring system. CONCLUSIONS: Our polychemotherapeutic regimen proved to be valid in terms of activity and efficacy, and a further dose increase in single chemotherapeutic agents as well as lonidamine could therefore be justified.


Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Pulmonares/tratamiento farmacológico , Anciano , Antibióticos Antineoplásicos/administración & dosificación , Antineoplásicos Fitogénicos/administración & dosificación , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/secundario , Cisplatino/administración & dosificación , Doxorrubicina/administración & dosificación , Epirrubicina/administración & dosificación , Femenino , Humanos , Indazoles/administración & dosificación , Neoplasias Pulmonares/patología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Resultado del Tratamiento , Vindesina/administración & dosificación
5.
Jpn J Clin Oncol ; 14(1): 3-6, 1984 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-6323790

RESUMEN

Twenty-six patients with advanced bronchogenic adenocarcinoma or large cell carcinoma were treated by combination chemotherapy consisting of Ftorafur, adriamycin and mitomycin C (FAM II). The patients had not received prior chemotherapy and were not eligible for radiotherapy and surgery. The overall response rate was 25% (5 of 20 patients). One patient with adenocarcinoma achieved a complete response, four achieved a partial response and three a minor response. In four patients the disease was stable. The response did not vary strictly with initial performance status as patients with a Karnofsky score of less than 70% also showed a median survival of 7.5+ months. The FAM II combination was very well tolerated, particularly regarding nausea and vomiting; the latter occurred in only one patient. No patient required a reduction in the drug dose because of leukopenia or thrombocytopenia.


Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma/tratamiento farmacológico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Carcinoma Broncogénico/tratamiento farmacológico , Carcinoma de Células Pequeñas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Pulmonares/tratamiento farmacológico , Adenocarcinoma/mortalidad , Adulto , Anciano , Alopecia/inducido químicamente , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Carcinoma Broncogénico/mortalidad , Carcinoma de Células Pequeñas/mortalidad , Doxorrubicina/administración & dosificación , Doxorrubicina/efectos adversos , Femenino , Humanos , Leucopenia/inducido químicamente , Neoplasias Pulmonares/mortalidad , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Mitomicina , Mitomicinas/administración & dosificación , Mitomicinas/efectos adversos , Náusea/inducido químicamente , Tegafur/administración & dosificación , Tegafur/efectos adversos , Trombocitopenia/inducido químicamente
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA