Longer Operative Time for Lower Extremity Bypass Surgery is Associated With Inferior Outcomes.

INTRODUCTION: This study aims to assess the association of operative time with the postoperative length of stay and unplanned return to the operating room in patients undergoing femoral to below knee popliteal bypasses, stratified by autologous vein graft or polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis of vascular quality initiative database (2003-2021). The selected patients were grouped into the following: vein bypass (group I) and PTFE (group II) patients. Each group was further stratified by a median split of operative time (i.e., 210 min for autologous vein and 155 min for PTFE) to study the outcomes. The outcomes were assessed by univariate and multivariate approach. RESULTS: Of the 10,902 patients studied, 3570 (32.7%) were in the autologous vein group, while 7332 (67.3%) were in the PTFE group. Univariate analysis revealed autologous vein and PTFE graft recipients that had increased operative times were associated with a longer mean postoperative length of stay and a higher incidence of all-cause return to the operating room. In PTFE group, patients with prolonged operative times were also found to be associated with higher incidence of major amputation, surgical site infection, and cardiovascular events, along with loss of primary patency within a year. CONCLUSIONS: For patients undergoing femoral to below knee popliteal bypasses using an autologous vein or PTFE, longer operative times were associated with inferior outcomes. Mortality was not found to be associated with prolonged operative time.

History of Preoperative Use of Gabapentin Before Lower Extremity Bypass Predisposes Patients to a High Risk of Opioid Use and Dependence in a Dose-dependent Manner.

INTRODUCTION: This study assesses the association of preoperative use of gabapentinoids (GBPs) with postoperative risk of opioid-related disorders in peripheral artery disease patients undergoing lower extremity bypass operation. METHODS: This is a retrospective propensity score-matched analysis of patients undergoing peripheral artery bypass in TriNetX, a multicenter national database. Two study groups were constituted based on the preoperative history of prescribed GBPs. Primary outcomes were opioid-related disorders and mortality. The outcomes were reported at two-time endpoints that is, at 1 and 5 y. RESULTS: This study population included a total of 23,706 patients. After propensity score-matched analysis, each group contained 5130 patients. The primary outcomes showed a significant increase in postoperative opioid-related disorders at the 1 and 5-y time points between GBPs and no GBPs groups: 1-y outcome (2.0% versus 1.1%; adj. P = 0.007) and 5-y outcome (4.5% versus 3.5%; adj. P = 0.035). Logistic regression analysis revealed an increase in the 1-y (adjusted odds ratio= 1.664; 95% CI [1.217, 2.273], P = 0.001) and 5-y (OR = 1.353; 95% CI [1.107, 1.653], P = 0.003) odds of opioid-related disorders in patients on GBPs. A secondary analysis showed a significant dose-dependent increase in the associated risk of 5-y opioid-related disorders in patients with a history of prescribed gabapentin. CONCLUSIONS: In patients undergoing lower extremity bypass with a history of gabapentin use, there is an associated increased long-term risk of opioid-related disorders in a dose-dependent fashion. Overall, this study highlights weighing risks and benefits of prescribing GBPs for pain control versus their long-term associated risk of opioid-related disorders among other adverse outcomes.