Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
1.
J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab ; 33(2): 223-231, 2020 Feb 25.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31809264

RESUMEN

Background Chronic inflammation plays a critical role in the development of obesity-related metabolic dysfunction. The tri-ponderal mass index (TMI) may be more effective than body mass index (BMI) for estimating body fat levels. This study compared the efficacy of BMI and TMI in screening for dyslipidemia, insulin sensitivity, and inflammation in childhood obesity. Methods This study included 80 children who were classified as normal weight, overweight or obese using standardized BMI (BMI standard deviation score [SDS]) and TMI measurements. Fasting blood glucose, insulin, homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), triglycerides, total cholesterol, liver function enzymes, leptin, serum free fatty acid (FFA), fetuin-A, monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1), tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), and interleukin (IL)-6 levels were evaluated using both classification systems. Results LDL-C levels significantly differed within the groups by BMI, and serum FFA levels differed only according to the TMI. Serum MCP-1, TNF-α, IL-6, and fetuin-A levels showed no difference according to the TMI or BMI SDS. Fetuin-A levels did not differ between the insulin-resistant and non-resistant cases. Fetuin-A was the only inflammatory marker positively correlated with BMI. No inflammatory markers correlated with TMI. Fetuin-A, MCP-1, TNF-α, and IL-6 correlated with each other, but not with metabolic parameters. Conclusions BMI SDS and TMI were associated with metabolic disturbances in childhood obesity. Weight versus heightn values may be related more to metabolic parameters than to inflammatory changes.


Asunto(s)
Biomarcadores/sangre , Índice de Masa Corporal , Dislipidemias/epidemiología , Inflamación/epidemiología , Resistencia a la Insulina , Sobrepeso/fisiopatología , Obesidad Infantil/fisiopatología , Adolescente , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Niño , Preescolar , Dislipidemias/sangre , Dislipidemias/diagnóstico , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Inflamación/sangre , Inflamación/diagnóstico , Masculino , Pronóstico , Turquía/epidemiología
2.
J Endourol ; 34(10): 1015-1020, 2020 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32475165

RESUMEN

Objectives: Due to the increasing fragility of the instruments and rising concerns about the sterility of reprocessable scopes, several single-use devices for flexible ureteroscopy have been introduced. In this study, we compare currently available disposable digital and fiberoptic flexible ureteroscopes with a contemporary reusable fiberoptic device. Materials and Methods: LithoVue™, Pusen Uscope® (UE3011, UE3022), Flexor®Vue™, and a reusable fiber optic flexible ureteroscope (BOA vision®) were tested in kidney models. The setup included (1) visualization of all calices (correct assignment of colored pearls) and (2) the extraction of human calculi with a standard disposable extraction device (NGage®). We documented the effective visualization, stone extraction, and times to completion. In addition, the surgeons' workload and performance were determined using the National Aeronautics and Space Administration-Task Load Index. Results: In visualizing and identifying calices, the LithoVue and both generations of the Uscope performed similarly, but time to completion was significantly longer for all single-use devices in comparison with the Boa Vision. LithoVue retracted stones almost as well as the reusable scope (97% vs 95%/82%/96% stone clearance), while accessibility was impeded using Uscope UE3011, as reflected by the retrieval time per stone (73 vs 102 seconds/stone). This disadvantage has, however, been overcome with the new Uscope Generation UE3022, showing a retrieval time of only 65 seconds per stone, excelling over the reusable scope in this category. The Uscope UE3022 image quality was also rated best, but showed no significant difference. Conclusions: In comparison with disposable ureteroscopes available, LithoVue offers performance and characteristics similar to a reusable device, while the FlexorVu's performance does not yet yield satisfactory results for clinical use. The first generation of Uscope exhibits potential, but requires further technical improvements to match the performance of a reusable device. With the new-generation UE3022, Pusen has made significant improvement and offers a quality comparable with the LithoVue's.


Asunto(s)
Cálculos Renales , Ureteroscopios , Diseño de Equipo , Humanos , Riñón , Ureteroscopía
3.
J Endourol ; 31(11): 1139-1144, 2017 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28844156

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To evaluate and compare Flexor®Vue™, a semidisposable endoscopic deflection system with disposable ureteral sheath and reusable visualization source, and a nondisposable fiber optic ureteroscope in a standard in vitro setting. MATERIALS AND METHODS: FlexorVue and a reusable fiber optic flexible ureteroscope were each tested in an artificial kidney model. The experimental setup included the visualization of colored pearls and the extraction of calculi with two different extraction devices (NCircle® and NGage®). The procedures were performed by six experienced surgeons. Visualization time, access to calices, successful stone retraction, and time required were recorded. In addition, the surgeons' workload and subjective performance were determined according to the National Aeronautics and Space Administration-task load index (NASA-TLX). We referred to the Likert scale to assess maneuverability, handling, and image quality. RESULTS: Nearly all calices (99%) were correctly identified using the reusable scope, indicating full kidney access, whereas 74% of the calices were visualized using FlexorVue, of which 81% were correctly identified. Access to the lower poles of the kidney model was significantly less likely with the disposable device, and time to completion was significantly longer (755 s vs 153 s, p < 0.001). The stone clearance success rate with the disposable device was 23% using the NGage and 13% using the NCircle basket. Overall NASA-TLX scores were significantly higher using FlexorVue. The conventional reusable device also demonstrated superior maneuverability, handling, and image quality. CONCLUSIONS: FlexorVue offers a semidisposable deflecting endoscopic system allowing basic ureteroscopic and cystoscopic procedures. For its use as an addition or replacement for current reusable scopes, it requires substantial technical improvements.


Asunto(s)
Cálculos Renales/diagnóstico por imagen , Modelos Biológicos , Ureteroscopios , Ureteroscopía/instrumentación , Equipos Desechables , Diseño de Equipo , Tecnología de Fibra Óptica/instrumentación , Humanos , Cálculos Renales/cirugía , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA