Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 8 de 8
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol ; 13(9): 1697-9, 2015 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25681317

RESUMEN

Patients with serrated polyposis develop multiple colorectal hyperplastic and/or serrated sessile adenomas/polyps. We investigated the risk of colorectal and other cancers by analyzing data from 64 patients with serrated polyposis (mean age at diagnosis, 54 y; 41% men; 92% white) listed in the Johns Hopkins Polyposis Registry. Medical, endoscopic, and histopathology reports were evaluated. Six patients (9.4%) had a history of colorectal cancer, diagnosed at a mean age of 56 years; 6 additional patients (9.4%) had at least 1 advanced colorectal adenoma. Extracolonic cancers were found in 16% of the study population. The standard incidence ratio for colorectal cancer in patients with serrated polyposis was 18.72 (95% confidence interval, 6.87-40.74) and for extracolonic cancer was 31.20 (95% confidence interval, 14.96-57.37), compared with the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results population. Patients with serrated polyposis therefore have a high risk for colorectal cancer and require vigilant colorectal surveillance, starting at the time of diagnosis of serrated polyposis. The risk of extracolonic cancer also appears to be increased, but this requires further evaluation.


Asunto(s)
Adenoma/epidemiología , Pólipos del Colon/complicaciones , Neoplasias Colorrectales/epidemiología , Adulto , Anciano , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Medición de Riesgo , Adulto Joven
2.
J Surg Res ; 184(2): 867-72, 2013 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23726235

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To determine the short-term outcome of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of pancreatic tissue near the duodenum and portomesenteric vessels (PMV) in a porcine model with and without intraluminal duodenal cooling. BACKGROUND: RFA has been proposed as a new treatment strategy in patients with unresectable locally advanced pancreatic cancer. RFA may cause thermal damage to the duodenum and vascular structures, but these risks and potential protective measures have never been systematically addressed. Intraluminal duodenal cooling during RFA could prevent thermal damage to the duodenum. METHODS: RFA was performed in 11 pigs during laparotomy with a bipolar probe of 30 mm active length at a power of 30 W until a total energy of 15 kJ was administered. The RFA probe was inserted in the pancreas at 5 or 15 mm from the duodenum, PMV, and in the pancreatic tail. RFA near the duodenum was performed with and without intraluminal duodenal cooling using 100 mL/min saline of 5°C. Histopathologic assessment was performed. RESULTS: The maximum RFA-induced temperature was 92°C. RFA with one single probe induced adequate ablation lesions with a diameter of 20 mm over a length of 30 mm. Without duodenal cooling, RFA induced duodenal thermal damage, whereas with duodenal cooling, no damage was observed. RFA at 15 mm from the PMV resulted in minimal superficial focal vascular damage, without thrombosis or hemorrhage. CONCLUSIONS: RFA provides adequate ablation zones in the pancreas of the porcine. Thermal damage to the duodenum can be prevented by intraluminal duodenal cooling without loss of ablation effectivity.


Asunto(s)
Ablación por Catéter/efectos adversos , Ablación por Catéter/métodos , Frío , Duodeno/fisiología , Modelos Animales , Páncreas/cirugía , Animales , Crioterapia/métodos , Hemorragia/prevención & control , Arterias Mesentéricas/lesiones , Páncreas/irrigación sanguínea , Sistema Porta/lesiones , Porcinos , Trombosis/prevención & control , Resultado del Tratamiento
3.
J Genet Couns ; 22(3): 345-57, 2013 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23192360

RESUMEN

Referral of patients with endometrial (EC) and/or ovarian cancer (OC) for genetic counseling is based on age at diagnosis and family history. Many patients with hereditary cancers are missed by following this strategy. We determined acceptance and mutation detection rate of offering genetic counseling and testing to unselected EC and OC patients. Therefore, in 2007, EC and OC patients were invited for genetic counseling and testing. Patients were asked for their reasons to accept or decline. Nineteen out of fifty-two EC patients (36 %) and twenty-two out of thirty-five OC patients (63 %) accepted genetic counseling, mainly to receive risk assessment for themselves and relatives. Counseling was declined mainly because patients did not want more tests or had no relatives for whom it was relevant. Eighteen out of nineteen EC patients (95 %) and twenty out of twenty-two OC patients (91 %) underwent genetic testing. One EC patient carried an MSH6 mutation (mutation detection rate: 6 %). BRCA1/2 mutations were found in two out of twenty OC patients (10 %). Eleven patients (29 %) received surveillance recommendations for themselves and their relatives. Finally, family history recorded by the gynecologist was compared to that taken by the clinical geneticist. Gynecologists reported family history in ten out of forty-one participants (24 %). In conclusion, genetic counseling and testing are acceptable to patients with OC and/or EC. The 10 % BRCA1/2 mutation detection rate and underreporting of family history by gynecologists warrant referral for genetic counseling for all OC patients, followed by BRCA1/2 testing if indicated. We recommend that microsatellite instability and immunohistochemical analysis be performed in all EC patients, followed by genetic counseling if appropriate. These strategies will lead to better cancer prevention in gynecological cancer patients and their relatives.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama/psicología , Asesoramiento Genético , Pruebas Genéticas , Neoplasias Ováricas/psicología , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud , Neoplasias de la Mama/genética , Femenino , Genes BRCA1 , Genes BRCA2 , Humanos , Neoplasias Ováricas/genética
4.
Am J Surg Pathol ; 47(7): 785-791, 2023 07 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37199453

RESUMEN

A clinical diagnosis of multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1) syndrome is usually confirmed with genetic testing in the germline. It is expected that menin protein expression is lost in MEN1-related tumors. Therefore, we investigated the potential of menin immunohistochemistry in parathyroid adenomas as an additional tool in the recognition and genetic diagnosis of MEN1 syndrome. Local pathology archives were searched for parathyroid tumors from patients with MEN1 syndrome and without MEN1, including sporadic, patients with multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2A and hyperparathyroidism-jaw parathyroid tumors. Menin immunohistochemistry was performed and its use to identify MEN1-related tumors was assessed. Twenty-nine parathyroid tumors from 16 patients with MEN1 and 61 patients with parathyroid tumors from 32 non-MEN1 were evaluated. Immunohistochemical nuclear menin loss in one or more tumors was found in 100% of patients with MEN1 and 9% of patients with non-MEN1. In patients with multiple tumors, menin loss in at least one tumor was seen in 100% of 8 patients with MEN1 and 21% of patients with 14 non-MEN1. Using a cutoff of at least 2 tumors showing menin loss per patient, the positive and negative predictive values for the diagnosis MEN1 were both 100%. The practical and additional value of menin immunohistochemistry in clinical genetic MEN1 diagnosis is further illustrated by menin immunohistochemistry in 2 cases with a germline variant of unknown significance in the MEN1 gene. Menin immunohistochemistry is useful in the recognition of MEN1 syndrome as well as in the clinical genetic analysis of patients with inconclusive MEN1 germline testing.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasia Endocrina Múltiple Tipo 1 , Neoplasias de las Paratiroides , Humanos , Neoplasia Endocrina Múltiple Tipo 1/diagnóstico , Neoplasia Endocrina Múltiple Tipo 1/genética , Inmunohistoquímica , Neoplasias de las Paratiroides/diagnóstico , Neoplasias de las Paratiroides/genética , Pruebas Genéticas , Mutación de Línea Germinal
5.
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev ; 14(7): 1608-12, 2005 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16030090

RESUMEN

Sulindac reduces colorectal cancer risk in genetically susceptible humans and animals. The molecular mechanisms underlying these effects are incompletely understood. Many studies suggest an important role for induction of apoptosis involving the mitochondrial pathway and the death receptor pathway. Alternatively, mechanisms involving the APC-beta-catenin-Wnt pathway have been suggested, possibly mediated by p21. We determined the effects of sulindac on apoptosis and expression of death receptor (DR)-4 and DR5, beta-catenin, and p21 in normal-appearing colorectal epithelium. Biopsies were obtained before and after sulindac treatment during two chemoprevention studies. Patients (n = 18) with hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) received 150 mg sulindac bd for 4 weeks in a placebo-controlled crossover design. Patients (n = 6) with familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) received 150 mg sulindac bd for 6 months. Apoptosis was assessed by M30 staining and expression patterns of DR4, DR5, beta-catenin, and p21 were studied immunohistochemically. In HNPCC patients, apoptotic indices were similar following placebo and sulindac. Also in FAP patients, apoptotic indices were not different after sulindac compared with pretreatment values. Expression of DR4 and DR5 was observed in all samples with no consistent differences between placebo/baseline and sulindac. Intensity of membranous beta-catenin staining was lower in HNPCC samples following sulindac compared with placebo (P < 0.001). Similar results were obtained in FAP samples (P < 0.01). p21 expressions before and after sulindac treatment were similar in both patient groups. In conclusion, sulindac inhibits beta-catenin expression in normal colorectal epithelium from HNPCC and FAP patients without affecting apoptotic indices and DR4, DR5, and p21 expression.


Asunto(s)
Poliposis Adenomatosa del Colon/tratamiento farmacológico , Antiinflamatorios no Esteroideos/uso terapéutico , Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Apoptosis/efectos de los fármacos , Neoplasias Colorrectales/prevención & control , Proteínas del Citoesqueleto/antagonistas & inhibidores , Sulindac/uso terapéutico , Transactivadores/antagonistas & inhibidores , Poliposis Adenomatosa del Colon/genética , Adulto , Biomarcadores de Tumor , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , beta Catenina
6.
Cancer Biol Ther ; 3(7): 651-6, 2004 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15136764

RESUMEN

Ampullary adenocarcinoma is an aggressive cancer with a poor prognosis. Without surgical resection, ampullary adenocarcinomas can be difficult to distinguish from ampullary adenomas. The aim of this study was to identify differentially expressed genes in ampullary adenocarcinoma in order to identify candidate markers of the disease. The Affymetrix Human Genome U133 GeneChip set (HG-U133A and HG-U133B) was used to obtain gene expression profiles of 5 ampullary adenocarcinomas and 10 normal duodenal samples. Using fold change analysis we identified 235 fragments expressed at least fivefold higher in ampullary cancers than in normal duodenum. The expression profiles of eight candidate overexpressed genes (osteopontin, mesothelin, tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases 1, mucin-1, mucin-5, fascin, heat shock protein 47, fibronectin 1) were confirmed by immunohistochemistry or in situ hybridization on tissue microarrays (TMA) containing 54 ampullary adenocarcinomas. One of these genes, osteopontin, was expressed 27-fold higher levels in ampullary adenocarcinomas compared to normal duodenum by genechip analysis. We therefore determined serum osteopontin levels in patients with ampullary neoplasms, patients with other periampullary diseases and in normal controls. Mean preoperative serum osteopontin levels as measured by competitive ELISA were 906 +/- 268 ng/ml in patients with ampullary cancer, 867 +/- 160 ng/ml in patients with an ampullary adenoma, 327.1 +/- 195.6 ng/ml in patients with nonmalignant periampullary diseases and 204 +/- 65 ng/ml in age-matched healthy controls (p < 0.001). Measurement of markers of ampullary cancer such as osteopontin may aid in the early detection and differential diagnosis of patients with periampullary lesions.


Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma/genética , Ampolla Hepatopancreática/cirugía , Biomarcadores de Tumor/metabolismo , Neoplasias del Conducto Colédoco/genética , Perfilación de la Expresión Génica , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/genética , Adenocarcinoma/diagnóstico , Adenocarcinoma/metabolismo , Carcinoma Ductal Pancreático/diagnóstico , Carcinoma Ductal Pancreático/genética , Carcinoma Ductal Pancreático/metabolismo , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Neoplasias del Conducto Colédoco/diagnóstico , Neoplasias del Conducto Colédoco/metabolismo , Duodeno/metabolismo , Regulación Neoplásica de la Expresión Génica , Humanos , Técnicas para Inmunoenzimas , Hibridación in Situ , Análisis de Secuencia por Matrices de Oligonucleótidos , Osteopontina , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/metabolismo , Pancreaticoduodenectomía , Sialoglicoproteínas/metabolismo
7.
Am J Surg Pathol ; 32(12): 1905-9, 2008 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18813118

RESUMEN

The familial atypical multiple mole melanoma (FAMMM) syndrome is caused by a germline mutation of p16. More than 90% of the sporadic pancreatic carcinomas contain genetic alterations that inactivate p16. Patients with the FAMMM syndrome have an increased risk of developing pancreatic cancer. Ductal adenocarcinoma is the most common cancer of the pancreas and the one encountered in patients with FAMMM syndrome. Undifferentiated carcinoma with osteoclastic giant cells, also referred to as UCOCGC of the pancreas, is a rare variant of pancreatic cancer. An UCOCGC of the pancreas associated with FAMMM syndrome is described in this report. Molecular analysis confirmed a germline p16-Leiden deletion in the UCOCGC, accompanied by somatic loss of heterozygosity of the second p16 allele, and absence of p16 protein expression in the neoplastic cells. It is the first case reported and it provides additional evidence that UCOCGC can be considered as a variant of conventional ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreas.


Asunto(s)
Carcinoma Ductal Pancreático/complicaciones , Síndrome del Nevo Displásico/complicaciones , Células Gigantes/patología , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/complicaciones , Adulto , Calcinosis/patología , Carcinoma Ductal Pancreático/genética , Carcinoma Ductal Pancreático/patología , Inhibidor p16 de la Quinasa Dependiente de Ciclina/biosíntesis , Inhibidor p16 de la Quinasa Dependiente de Ciclina/genética , Síndrome del Nevo Displásico/genética , Síndrome del Nevo Displásico/patología , Eliminación de Gen , Genes p16 , Humanos , Inmunohistoquímica , Pérdida de Heterocigocidad , Masculino , Osteoclastos/patología , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/genética , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/patología , Linaje , Síndrome
8.
J Clin Gastroenterol ; 42(1): 18-22, 2008 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18097284

RESUMEN

GOALS: To assess serologically diagnosed gastric body atrophy (GBA) by histology in a sample of the general population. BACKGROUND: GBA is a precursor lesion in gastric cancer. Data on GBA in a primary health care community in the Netherlands have not been reported. STUDY: Thirty-four subjects of 997 consecutive adults from a Dutch family practice had serologic GBA, according to hypergastrinemia (>100 ng/L), hypopepsinogenemia A (<17 microg/L), and a low pepsinogen A/C ratio (<1.6). Two years later, 25 subjects of this group, agreed in serologic retesting and gastroscopy with biopsies for histologic assessment according to the Sydney system. RESULTS: At serologic retesting, 20 of 25 subjects again fulfilled the serologic criteria of GBA. Histologic examination of the corpus biopsies showed advanced GBA in 18 subjects (75%) of 24 (1 subject had no corpus biopsies) and 17 of 19 (89%) subjects with repeated positive serology. After disclosure of serology results, reexamination of the biopsies revealed GBA also in the 2 patients with initially insufficient evidence of GBA, giving a concordance of 100% (19/19). One subject with normal serum gastrin at retesting had both antral and body atrophy giving a concordance between serologic and histologic GBA of 95% (19/20). No adenomatous polyps, tumors, or dysplastic alterations were found. CONCLUSIONS: Identification by serology of asymptomatic patients with advanced GBA in primary care is adequately possible and useful in selecting for endoscopy.


Asunto(s)
Gastritis Atrófica/diagnóstico , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Anticuerpos Antibacterianos/sangre , Atrofia/patología , Autoanticuerpos/sangre , Enfermedades Autoinmunes/epidemiología , Biopsia , Enfermedad Crónica , Estudios de Cohortes , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Endoscopía , Femenino , Fundus Gástrico/patología , Gastrinas/sangre , Gastritis Atrófica/sangre , Infecciones por Helicobacter/epidemiología , Helicobacter pylori/inmunología , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Países Bajos/epidemiología , Pepsinógenos/sangre , Prevalencia , Antro Pilórico/patología , Pruebas Serológicas
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA