Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
Tipo del documento
Asunto de la revista
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Vasc Surg ; 2024 May 13.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38750942

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Prevention of late type Ia endoleaks is the main concern in thoracic endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (TEVAR) for thoracic aortic aneurysm. Since 2017, we have performed zone 0 TEVAR with proximal fixation augmentation using a Najuta thoracic fenestrated stent graft in addition to zone 2 TEVAR for distal arch aneurysms. We report the early and midterm outcomes of TEVAR performed using this strategy. METHODS: This single-center retrospective study enrolled 386 cases of TEVAR for thoracic aortic disease between January 2013 and December 2020. Patients with thoracic aortic aneurysm treated by TEVAR landing at zone 2 was referred to as the standard group, whereas those treated by TEVAR landing at zone 0 using a Najuta fenestrated stent graft in addition to zone 2 TEVAR was referred to as the augmentation group. We retrospectively compared the clinical outcomes between the two groups. The primary end point was secondary intervention for postoperative type Ia endoleaks. Secondary end points were technical success, aneurysm-related death, and major adverse events (MAEs), including stroke, paraplegia, endoleaks, and secondary interventions. RESULTS: We performed TEVAR in 41 and 30 cases in the standard and augmentation groups, respectively. The mean aneurysm sizes in the standard and augmentation groups were 54.5 and 57.3 mm (P = .23), and the proximal neck lengths were 16.8 and 17.4 mm (P = .65), respectively. The anatomical characteristics seemed to be similar in both groups. The technical success rate in both groups was 100%. Three cases in the standard group had MAEs, including two stroke and one brachial artery pseudoaneurysm; whereas two cases had MAEs in the augmentation group, including one stroke and one paraplegia. There was no 30-day mortality or retrograde type A dissection in both groups. The mean observation periods in the standard and augmentation groups were 46 months (range, 1-123 months) and 35 months (range, 1-73 months), respectively. At 36 and 60 months after the procedure, the freedom from aneurysm-related death was 97.6% and 97.6% in the standard group, 100.0% and 100.0% in the augmentation group (P = .39); and the freedom from reintervention for type Ia endoleaks was 79.2% and 65.2% in the standard group, 100.0% and 100.0% in the augmentation group (P = .0087). A statistically significant decrease in reinterventions for type Ia endoleaks was observed in the augmentation group. CONCLUSIONS: Proximal fixation augmentation using the Najuta fenestrated stent graft during TEVAR for distal arch aneurysm is effective in preventing the postoperative late type Ia endoleaks.

2.
Ann Vasc Surg ; 66: 193-199, 2020 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31778761

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Anatomically suitable Crawford type I (C-I) thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm (TAAA) can be treated by thoracic endovascular aneurysm repair (TEVAR) with intentional celiac artery (CA) coverage to ensure distal seal. We report on mid-term results of TEVAR with intentional CA coverage for C-I TAAA. METHODS: Between August 2010 and July 2017, we treated 16 cases of C-I TAAA by TEVAR with intentional CA coverage using the Zenith TX2 Thoracic Distal Component Endograft. The primary end point was aneurysm shrinkage. Secondary end points were technical success, aneurysm-related death (ARD), and major adverse events (MAEs) including stroke, paraplegia, visceral ischemia, endoleak, and secondary intervention. RESULTS: The preoperative mean aneurysm size was 57.7 ± 8.0 mm. The technical success rate was 100%. There was no aneurysm-related mortality; however, one patient suffered from superior mesenteric artery embolization, which required an open laparotomy. The mean observational period was 40.5 months, and aneurysm shrinkage of >5 mm was observed in 10 cases (62.5%). At 12, 36, and 60 months after the procedure, freedom from ARD was 100%, 100%, and 100%, respectively, whereas freedom from MAE including secondary intervention was 86.7%, 86.7%, and 77.0%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Mid-term results of TEVAR with intentional CA coverage for C-I TAAA were acceptable.


Asunto(s)
Aneurisma de la Aorta Torácica/cirugía , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/instrumentación , Prótesis Vascular , Arteria Celíaca/cirugía , Procedimientos Endovasculares/instrumentación , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Aneurisma de la Aorta Torácica/diagnóstico por imagen , Aneurisma de la Aorta Torácica/fisiopatología , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/efectos adversos , Arteria Celíaca/diagnóstico por imagen , Arteria Celíaca/fisiopatología , Procedimientos Endovasculares/efectos adversos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/cirugía , Diseño de Prótesis , Reoperación , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA