Does the extension of the type of hysterectomy contribute to the local control of endometrial cancer?

OBJECTIVE: To examine the necessity and sufficiency of different types of hysterectomy for the surgical treatment of endometrial cancer. METHODS: This was a multicenter collaborative study conducted by 11 institutions. Among patients with stage I-III endometrial cancer who underwent surgery as the initial treatment (only chemotherapy was provided if adjuvant therapy was needed) from 2001 to 2012, we retrospectively examined the type of hysterectomy, clinicopathological factors, recurrence rate over a maximum period of 5 years, and the site of recurrence. The local recurrence rate was examined by univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: Among 1335 patients, 982 (73.6%) underwent simple hysterectomy (SH) and 353 (26.4%) underwent modified radical hysterectomy (mRH) and were observed for a mean duration of 51.8 months. No significant difference was observed in the rate of local recurrence between the SH and mRH groups (p = 0.928). In multivariate analysis, clinicopathological factors independently associated with localized recurrence included postmenopausal status [hazard ratio (HR) 5.036, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.506-16.841, p = 0.009], with stages II (HR 3.337, 95% CI 1.701-6.547, p < 0.001) and III (HR 2.445, 95% CI 1.280-4.668, p = 0.007), vs stage I and histological type 2 (HR 1.610, 95% CI 0.938-2.762, p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: For endometrial cancer patients requiring surgery, the selection of a more extensive type of hysterectomy did not reduce the rate of local recurrence. Therefore, there is little significance in performing mRH in such cases.

Emergency cerclage versus expectant management for prolapsed fetal membranes: a retrospective, comparative study.

AIM: To compare outcomes after emergency cerclage versus expectant management for prolapsed fetal membranes in women with cervical incompetency. METHODS: The January 2000-December 2012 hospital database was analyzed to identify women managed for prolapsed fetal membranes who did not have premature rupture of membranes, clinically discernible chorioamnionitis, or treatment-resistant uterine contractions from 15 to 26 weeks of gestation retrospectively. Durations of pregnancy prolongation and numbers of deliveries after 32 and 28 weeks were compared between women undergoing emergency cervical cerclage and those receiving expectant management. RESULTS: Fifteen of the 35 women underwent emergency cervical cerclage ('cerclage group'), while the other 20 were managed expectantly ('bedrest group'). In the cerclage group, median gestational ages at procedure and delivery times were 22.6 (15.9-26.1) and 32.4 (19.4-41.6) weeks, respectively. Median gestational ages on admission and at delivery in the bedrest group were 23.4 (21.1-26.4) and 26.0 (23.1-36.4) weeks, respectively. The median duration of pregnancy prolongation was 44 days (4-165) in the cerclage group and 12.5 days (2-93) in the bedrest group (P < 0.01). Numbers of deliveries after 28 and 32 weeks were both significantly higher in the cerclage than in the bedrest group (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: In women with prolapsed fetal membranes but no signs of infection or painful uterine contractions, emergency cervical cerclage prolonged pregnancy duration as compared with expectant management.