Missed diagnosis-a major barrier to patient access to obesity healthcare in the primary care setting.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether individuals with an elevated BMI measurement, for whom a diagnosis of overweight or obesity (OW/OB) is not recorded, are less likely to be offered clinical care for obesity compared to those with a recorded diagnosis. SUBJECTS: A retrospective cohort study using the electronic medical record database of Maccabi Healthcare Services (MHS) in Israel. Included were 200,000 adults with BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2 measurement recorded during a primary care visit between 2014 and 2020, and no prior diagnosis of OW/OB or related co-morbidities. METHODS: The relationships between a recorded diagnosis of OW/OB and two composite outcomes: 1. A composite of referrals to screening tests for metabolic complications; 2. A composite of weight loss intervention and follow up, were analyzed using multivariate logistic regression models. RESULTS: In only 18% of individuals, a diagnosis of OW/OB was recorded. After adjusting for multiple potential confounding factors, individuals who received a recorded diagnosis were 18% more likely to be offered an evaluation for obesity-related metabolic complication, (OR 1.18, 95% CI 1.15-1.21, p < 0.001), and almost twice as likely to be offered intervention and follow up for their excess body weight (OR 1.84, 95% CI 1.76-1.94, p < 0.001) compared to individuals with missed diagnosis. These results persisted after adjusting for inter-physician variability. In addition, male sex, older age, and Arab sector were all associated with lower rates of weight loss intervention and follow up, while young individuals were less likely to be screened for metabolic complications. CONCLUSION: Beyond BMI measurement, a recorded diagnosis of OW/OB is associated with statistically and clinically significant higher rates of performance of obesity care and intervention. Undiagnosed OW/OB presents a significant clinical opportunity, as recording a diagnosis of OW/OB would predict improved patient access to obesity healthcare and improved clinical outcomes.

A novel heart rate variability algorithm for the detection of myocardial ischemia: pilot data from a prospective clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Heart rate variability (HRV) analysis has been shown to be a predictor of sudden cardiac death and all-cause mortality in patients with cardiac disease. OBJECTIVES: To examine whether newer HRV analysis algorithms, as used by the HeartTrends device, are superior to exercise stress testing (EST) for the detection of myocardial ischemia in patients without known coronary artery disease (CAD). METHODS: We present pilot data of the first 100 subjects enrolled in a clinical trial designed to evaluate the yield of short-term (1 hour) HRV testing for the detection of myocardial ischemia. The study population comprised subjects without known CAD referred to a tertiary medical center for EST with single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI). All patients underwent a 1 hour electrocardiographic acquisition for HRV analysis with a HeartTrends device prior to ESTwith MPI. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values (PPV and NPV, respectively) were calculated for EST and HRV analysis, using MPI as the gold standard for the non-invasive detection of myocardial ischemia. RESULTS: In this cohort 15% had a pathologic MPI result. HRV analysis showed superior sensitivity (85%), PPV (50%) and NPV (97%) as compared to standard EST (53%, 42%, 90%, respectively), while the specificity of the two tests was similar (86% and 85%, respectively). The close agreement between HRV and MPI was even more pronounced among patients > 65 years of age. CONCLUSIONS: Our pilot data suggest that the diagnostic yield of the novel HeartTrends HRV algorithm is superior to conventional EST for the non-invasive detection of myocardial ischemia.

Fast track evaluation of patients with acute chest pain: experience in a large-scale chest pain unit in Israel.

BACKGROUND: Many patients present to the emergency department with chest pain. While in most of them chest pain represents a benign complaint, in some patients it underlies a life-threatening illness. OBJECTIVES: To assess the routine evaluation of patients presenting to the ED with acute chest pain by means of a cardiologist-based chest pain unit using different noninvasive imaging modalities. METHODS: We evaluated the records of 1055 consecutive patients who presented to the ED with complaints of chest pain and were admitted to the CPU. After an observation period and according to the decision of the attending cardiologist, patients underwent myocardial perfusion scintigraphy, multidetector computed tomography, or stress echocardiography. RESULTS: The CPU attending cardiologist did not prescribe non-invasive evaluation for 108 of the 1055 patients, who were either admitted (58 patients) or discharged (50 patients) after an observation period. Of those remaining, 444 patients underwent MDCT, 445 MPS, and 58 stress echocardiography. Altogether, 907 patients (86%) were discharged from the CPU. During an average period of 236 +/- 223 days, 25 patients (3.1%) were readmitted due to chest pain of suspected cardiac origin, and only 8 patients (0.9%) suffered a major adverse cardiovascular event. CONCLUSIONS: Utilization of the CPU enabled a rapid and thorough evaluation of the patients' primary complaint, thereby reducing hospitalization costs and occupancy on the one hand and avoiding misdiagnosis in discharged patients on the other.

Comparison of the usefulness of heart rate variability versus exercise stress testing for the detection of myocardial ischemia in patients without known coronary artery disease.

Heart rate variability (HRV) has been shown to be attenuated in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) and may, therefore, be possibly used for the early detection of myocardial ischemia. We aimed to evaluate the diagnostic yield of a novel short-term HRV algorithm for the detection of myocardial ischemia in subjects without known CAD. We prospectively enrolled 450 subjects without known CAD who were referred to tertiary medical centers for exercise stress testing (EST) with single-photon emission computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI). All subjects underwent 1-hour Holter testing with subsequent HRV analysis before EST with MPI. The diagnostic yield of HRV analysis was compared with EST, using MPI as the gold standard for the noninvasive detection of myocardial ischemia. All subjects had intermediate pretest probability for CAD. Mean age was 62 years, 38% were women, 51% had hypertension, and 25% diabetes mellitus. HRV analysis showed superior sensitivity (77%) compared with standard EST (27%). After multivariate adjustment, HRV was independently associated with an 8.4-fold (p <0.001) increased likelihood for the detection of myocardial ischemia by MPI, whereas EST did not show a statistically significant association with a positive MPI (odds ratio 2.1; p = 0.12). Of subjects who were referred for subsequent coronary angiography, the respective sensitivities of HRV and EST for the detection of significant CAD were 73% versus 26%. Our data suggest that HRV can be used as an important noninvasive technique for the detection of myocardial ischemia in subjects without known CAD, providing superior sensitivity to conventional EST in this population.

Prognostic implications of nonobstructive coronary artery disease in patients undergoing coronary computed tomographic angiography for acute chest pain.

Coronary computed tomographic angiography can detect nonobstructive atherosclerotic lesions that would not otherwise have been detected with functional cardiac imaging. Currently, limited data exist regarding the clinical significance of these lesions in patients with acute chest pain. The aim of our study was to examine the prognostic significance of these nonobstructive findings in a patient population presenting with acute chest pain. We evaluated 959 consecutive patients who underwent coronary computed tomographic angiography for investigation of acute chest pain. The patients were classified as having normal (n = 545), nonobstructive coronary artery disease (CAD; defined as any narrowing <50% diameter stenosis; n = 312), or obstructive CAD (narrowing of ≥50% diameter stenosis; n = 65). Follow-up data for a minimum of 12 months (mean 27 ± 11) was obtained for any major adverse coronary events consisting of death, nonfatal acute coronary syndrome, and coronary revascularization. Compared to patients with normal coronary arteries, those with nonobstructive CAD were older and had a greater prevalence of CAD risk factors. The incidence of major adverse coronary events was equally low among both these groups (0.6% vs 1.3%, for the normal and nonobstructive groups, respectively, p = 0.2). In conclusion, patients with either nonobstructive CAD or normal findings, as evaluated by coronary computed tomographic angiography, for acute chest pain during an intermediate-term follow-up period had equally benign clinical outcomes.

Usefulness of mild therapeutic hypothermia for hospitalized comatose patients having out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.

Mild therapeutic hypothermia has proved beneficial after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in the adult population, when the initial rhythm is ventricular fibrillation (VF). In this study, data from 110 consecutive patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest due to VF (n = 86) or to non-VF rhythm (n = 24), admitted to an intensive cardiac care unit with restoration of spontaneous circulation and who remained unconscious on admission, were analyzed. Patients were cooled using an external cooling system. Of the patients with VF, 66% had favorable outcomes (Glasgow-Pittsburgh Cerebral Performance Category 1 or 2), and 30% died. Of the patients with non-VF, 8% had favorable outcomes (p <0.001 vs VF), and 63% died (p = 0.004 vs VF). In patients with VF, those with poor outcomes were older than those with favorable outcomes (odds ratio [OR] 1.61, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.03 to 2.7, p = 0.001) and had previous ejection fractions <35% (OR 7.72, 95% CI 1.8 to 33, p = 0.002). Outcomes were also worse when patients presented to the emergency room with seizures (OR 20.96, 95% CI 2.48 to 177.42, p = 0.003) or hemodynamic instability (OR 14.4, 95% CI 3.47 to 60, p <0.0001). In the non-VF group, the 2 patients with good outcomes were younger than those with unfavorable outcomes (39 ± 16 vs 65 ± 12 years, respectively, p = 0.04), with good left ventricular function on presentation (100% vs 4.5%, p = 0.0001) and with short asystole and/or short time from collapse to restoration of spontaneous circulation. In conclusion, mild therapeutic hypothermia in the adult population is more effective in patients with VF compared to those with non-VF. Good prognostic factors for patients with non-VF could be young age, good left ventricular function, and short anoxic time.

Usefulness of routine use of multidetector coronary computed tomography in the "fast track" evaluation of patients with acute chest pain.

Recently published American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology guidelines suggest that multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) may be appropriate for investigating acute chest pain (ACP). Only a few small studies have evaluated the use of MDCT in ACP, where it was not part of routine investigation. We sought to evaluate the routine use of MDCT in a large cohort of patients presenting with ACP in a real-world setting. We studied 785 consecutive patients with ACP who underwent evaluation by MDCT or myocardial perfusion scintigraphy after an observation period of > or = 12 hours. Patients with findings suggestive of significant coronary artery disease (CAD) were referred to coronary angiography. Forty-two patients were hospitalized due to evidence of myocardial ischemia and 44 patients were discharged after the observation period. Of the remaining 699 patients, 340 underwent MDCT and 359 myocardial perfusion scintigraphy. In 22 patients (7%) multidetector computed tomogram showed significant CAD and in 32 (9%) patients myocardial perfusion scintigram showed significant ischemia. Significant CAD was confirmed by coronary angiography in 65% and 60%, respectively. Multidetector computed tomogram was nondiagnostic in 31 patients (9%). Extracardiac findings that might be related to ACP and/or necessitated further investigation were demonstrated by multidetector computed tomogram in 71 patients (21%). During 3-month follow-up, 1 patient (0.3%) with negative multidetector computed tomographic and 9 (3%) with negative myocardial perfusion scintigraphic findings developed an acute coronary syndrome or died. Rehospitalization, due to recurrent chest pain, occurred in 9 patients (3.3%) and 21 patients (7.2%), respectively. In conclusion, MDCT could be an appropriate alternative to traditional noninvasive techniques for investigating ACP.