SEAIC Specialty Forum: Analysis of the Current Situation of Allergology in Spain and Outlook for the Future.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Allergology has been a recognized medical specialty in Spain, with fully defined aims and competencies for more than 4 decades. However, in recent years, its visibility seems to have decreased somewhat. Objectives: To identify which specific factors have contributed to the waning of the importance of the specialty and find tangible solutions to consolidate its place as a front-line medical specialty. MATERIAL AND METHODS: An online population survey comprising 60 items of interest was prepared. The degree of agreement and the level of satisfaction with each item were assessed, and implementable initiatives in the short, medium, and long terms were defined in order to provide solutions to the issues identified. RESULTS: The survey was completed by a total of 167 specialists with an average of 18 years' experience. Most were from public reference hospitals, and 29.3% were heads of department. The line of action for which a good degree of agreement was achieved was to promote the inclusion of an allergist in multidisciplinary teams. The priority lines of action were to improve undergraduate and graduate training in allergology and specialized nursing, to identify curricula in Spain, and to develop robust teaching projects. CONCLUSIONS: The results revealed a high degree of homogeneity between professionals. The basic pillars highlighted were as follows: quality training, knowledge, and research in immunotherapy; an innovative portfolio of services endorsed by clinical practice guidelines; and presence in multidisciplinary teams and relevant hospital committees.

Quality Standards for Allergen Immunotherapy Clinics in Spain: Consensus Document.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Allergen immunotherapy clinics (AITCs) in Spain differ widely in terms of structure, organization, resources, and portfolio of services. Therefore, it is essential to unify treatment criteria and define quality standards for the most complex AITCs. Objective: To establish a series of recommendations that make it possible to guarantee quality and safety in the administration of immunotherapy and define quality standards for the most complex AITCs. METHODS: This project began with an online survey of 65 allergy departments/units throughout Spain in 2013. Next, a 2-phase consensus process was carried out. In the first phase, 10 experts defined and agreed on the standards using the RAND/UCLA Appropriateness method; in the second, the agreements were validated by means of a 2-round Delphi consultation with 84 experts. RESULTS: Consensus was reached on minimum safety and quality criteria in the administration of allergen immunotherapy, and 2 levels of highly complex AITCs were defined: accredited AITCs and accredited AITCs with excellence. Consensus was also reached on quality standards and accreditation criteria for both levels. CONCLUSIONS: This project is pioneering in terms of its purpose (the definition of quality standards for AITCs) and of the use of structured participation techniques (combination of the RAND/UCLA and Delphi methods). It enabled the design of minimum standards for quality and safety in administering AIT, as well as quality criteria for accreditation of AITCs supported by a broad panel of experts from the Spanish Society of Allergology and Clinical Immunology.

SEAIC Specialty Forum: Analysis of the Current Situation of Allergology in Spain and Outlook for the Future

Background: Allergology has been a recognized medical specialty in Spain, with fully defined aims and competencies for more than 4 decades. However, in recent years, its visibility seems to have decreased somewhat. Objectives: To identify which specific factors have contributed to the waning of the importance of the specialty and find tangible solutions to consolidate its place as a front-line medical specialty. Material and methods: An online population survey comprising 60 items of interest was prepared. The degree of agreement and the level of satisfaction with each item were assessed, and implementable initiatives in the short, medium, and long terms were defined in order to provide solutions to the issues identified. Results: The survey was completed by a total of 167 specialists with an average of 18 years’ experience. Most were from public reference hospitals, and 29.3% were heads of department. The line of action for which a good degree of agreement was achieved was to promote the inclusion of an allergist in multidisciplinary teams. The priority lines of action were to improve undergraduate and graduate training in allergology and specialized nursing, to identify curricula in Spain, and to develop robust teaching projects. Conclusions: The results revealed a high degree of homogeneity between professionals. The basic pillars highlighted were as follows: quality training, knowledge, and research in immunotherapy; an innovative portfolio of services endorsed by clinical practice guidelines; and presence in multidisciplinary teams and relevant hospital committees. (AU)

Antecedentes: En nuestro país, la alergología constituye una especialidad médica reconocida con fines y competencias completamente definidos desde hace más de cuatro décadas. Sin embargo, en los últimos tiempos parece hacer frente a una cierta disminución de su visibilidad y reconocimiento. Objetivos: Identificar qué factores específicos contribuyen a esta dilución de su peso específico y buscar soluciones tangibles que la afiancen como especialidad médica de primera línea. Material y métodos: Se elaboró una encuesta poblacional online compuesta por 60 ítems considerados de interés. Se valoró el grado de acuerdo y el nivel de satisfacción con cada uno, definiendo iniciativas implantables a corto, medio y largo plazo que aporten soluciones para las cuestiones identificadas. Resultados: La encuesta fue respondida por un total de 167 especialistas con una media de 18 años de experiencia, la mayoría procedentes de hospitales de referencia públicos, siendo un 29,3% jefes del servicio. La línea de acción que obtuvo un mayor grado de acuerdo fue promover la presencia del alergólogo en los equipos multidisciplinares. Como línea de acción más prioritaria se seleccionó mejorar la formación de pregrado y posgrado en alergología, así como la de enfermería especializada, identificando planes de estudio en nuestro país y elaborando proyectos docentes robustos. Conclusiones: Los resultados revelaron un elevado grado de homogeneidad entre los profesionales, destacando como pilares básicos la formación de calidad, los conocimientos e investigación en inmunoterapia, una cartera de servicios novedosa avalada por Guías de Práctica Clínica y la presencia en equipos multidisciplinares y comisiones hospitalarias relevantes. (AU)

Allergen Immunotherapy in the Era of SARS-CoV-2

No disponible

Quality standards for allergen immunotherapy clinics in Spain: consensus document

BACKGROUND: Allergen immunotherapy clinics (AITCs) in Spain differ widely in terms of structure, organization, resources, and portfolio of services. Therefore, it is essential to unify treatment criteria and define quality standards for the most complex AITCs. OBJECTIVE: To establish a series of recommendations that make it possible to guarantee quality and safety in the administration of immunotherapy and define quality standards for the most complex AITCs. METHODS: This project began with an online survey of 65 allergy departments/units throughout Spain in 2013. Next, a 2-phase consensus process was carried out. In the first phase, 10 experts defined and agreed on the standards using the RAND/UCLA Appropriateness method; in the second, the agreements were validated by means of a 2-round Delphi consultation with 84 experts. RESULTS: Consensus was reached on minimum safety and quality criteria in the administration of allergen immunotherapy, and 2 levels of highly complex AITCs were defined: accredited AITCs and accredited AITCs with excellence. Consensus was also reached on quality standards and accreditation criteria for both levels. CONCLUSIONS: This project is pioneering in terms of its purpose (the definition of quality standards for AITCs) and of the use of structured participation techniques (combination of the RAND/UCLA and Delphi methods). It enabled the design of minimum standards for quality and safety in administering AIT, as well as quality criteria for accreditation of AITCs supported by a broad panel of experts from the Spanish Society of Allergology and Clinical Immunology

ANTECEDENTES: Las unidades de inmunoterapia (UIT) en España son muy diferentes en cuanto a estructura, organización, recursos y cartera de servicios. Por ello, resulta esencial homogeneizar criterios de actuación y definir estándares de calidad para las UIT de mayor complejidad. OBJETIVO: Establecer recomendaciones que permitan garantizar la calidad y seguridad en la administración de la inmunoterapia y definir estándares de calidad para las UIT de mayor complejidad. MÉTODOS: Proyecto iniciado (año 2013) con una encuesta on-line a 65 servicios o unidades de alergología de toda España. Posteriormente, se desarrolló un proceso de consenso en dos fases. En la primera, diez expertos definieron y consensuaron los estándares mediante el método RAND/UCLA; en la segunda, los acuerdos se validaron mediante una consulta Delphi a dos rondas con 84 expertos. RESULTADOS: Se consensuaron criterios mínimos de seguridad y calidad en la administración de inmunoterapia con alérgenos (ITA) y se definieron dos niveles de UIT de mayor complejidad: las UIT acreditadas (UITA) y las UIT acreditadas con excelencia (UITAE), consensuándose también los estándares de calidad y criterios de acreditación para ambos niveles. CONCLUSIONES: Proyecto pionero en su objetivo - definición de estándares de calidad de UIT- y en el empleo de técnicas de participación estructuradas -combinación de los métodos RAND/UCLA y Delphi-. El resultado es la definición de unos mínimos de calidad y seguridad para administrar ITA, y un conjunto de criterios de calidad para la acreditación de las UIT que cuenta con el respaldo de un amplio panel de expertos de la SEAIC

Utilidad del esputo inducido en el diagnóstico del asma profesional / Induced sputum in the diagnostic of occupational asthma

El asma profesional es, hoy en día, la enfermedad respiratoria laboral más frecuente en los países industrializados. Su diagnóstico comporta aspectos de salud del trabajador y también aspectos médico-legales y económicos, por lo que un diagnóstico etiopatogénico correcto es de gran importancia. Tradicionalmente, el procedimiento diagnóstico del asma profesional está fundamentado en una historia clínico-laboral compatible, unas pruebas inmunológicas positivas frente al agente sospechado (cuando están indicadas) y unas pruebas funcionales respiratorias compatibles. Hasta la fecha, el patrón oro para el diagnóstico etiológico lo constituye la prueba de provocación bronquial específica con los agentes sospechados, que se considera positiva si se alcanza un descenso del FEV1 superior al 20 por ciento del valor basal. En la última década, se ha comenzado a utilizar la técnica del esputo inducido como herramienta de apoyo al estudio del asma profesional, con resultados prometedores. En este artículo se realiza una revisión bibliográfica y del estado actual del tema y se consideran los usos potenciales futuros de esta técnica (AU)

Importancia de la patología laboral sensibilizante, respiratoria y dermatológica en el mundo laboral / Importance of the sensitizing respiratory and dermatologic diseases in the occupational setting

En el presente artículo se pretende llamar la atención sobre la tendencia al alza de la patología respiratoria y dermatológica sensibilizante en el mundo laboral (asma profesional, dermatitis de contacto, neumonitis de hipersensibilidad, síndrome de disfunción de la vía reactiva (SDVR)). Finalmente se analiza esta patología en los estudios realizados en una Unidad de Neumología y Alergia Laboral (AU)