Rheumatic Diseases Associated With Posterior Reversible Encephalopathy Syndrome.

OBJECTIVE: Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome (PRES) is an acute neurological syndrome. There are many reports of PRES occurring in the setting of rheumatic diseases. However, it remains uncertain whether rheumatic diseases are truly a risk factor for PRES, as the literature consists of case reports and small clinical series. Here, we evaluated the relationship between PRES and the rheumatic diseases, using a large population-based data set as the reference. METHODS: We conducted a medical records review of hospitalizations in the United States during 2016 with a diagnosis of PRES. Hospitalizations were selected from the National Inpatient Sample. International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision, Clinical Modification codes were used to identify rheumatic diseases. A multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to calculate odds ratios (ORs) for the association of PRES and rheumatic diseases. RESULTS: There were 3125 hospitalizations that had a principal billing diagnosis of PRES. Multivariate logistic regression revealed the multiple independent associations with PRES. The demographic and nonrheumatic associations included acute renal failure (OR, 1.52), chronic renal failure (OR, 12.1), female (OR, 2.28), hypertension (OR, 8.73), kidney transplant (OR, 1.97), and preeclampsia/eclampsia (OR, 11.45). Rheumatic associations with PRES included antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated vasculitis (OR, 9.31), psoriatic arthritis (OR, 4.61), systemic sclerosis (OR, 6.62), systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) nephritis (OR, 7.53), and SLE without nephritis (OR, 2.38). CONCLUSIONS: This analysis represents the largest sample to date to assess PRES hospitalizations. It confirms that several rheumatic diseases are associated with PRES, including antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated vasculitis, systemic sclerosis, SLE, and psoriatic arthritis. Acute and unexplained central nervous system symptoms in these patient populations should prompt consideration of PRES.

Association of combustible and non-combustible tobacco use with clinically diagnosed adverse oral health outcomes among US adults, National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (2009-2014).

INTRODUCTION: There is an established link between tobacco use and adverse oral health outcomes. However, there is a paucity of research exploring the effect of various tobacco products on clinically diagnosed adverse oral health outcomes. METHODS: Data were pooled from three cycles of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey: 2009-2010; 2011-2012; and 2013-2014 (n = 11,453). Multivariable logistic regressions examined the associations between periodontitis and dental caries with the type of tobacco product used (combustible, non-combustible or both). RESULTS: Overall, 42.3% of the study sample had any periodontitis, 7.8% had severe periodontitis and 21.7% had dental caries. There was a higher prevalence of periodontitis and caries among combustible tobacco users than non-combustible tobacco use; 62.1% of combustible tobacco smokers had any periodontitis, 17.1% had severe periodontitis, while 39.4% of adults with dental caries were dual users. Compared to non-smokers, combustible tobacco use increased the odds of any periodontitis (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 2.81, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.28, 3.45) and severe periodontitis (aOR 2.62, 95% CI 1.90, 3.61). Compared to non-smokers, both combustible tobacco (aOR 2.11, 95% CI 1.61, 2.76) and non-combustible tobacco use (aOR 2.09, 95% CI 1.19, 3.66) increased the odds of dental caries. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: In this study of US adults, combustible tobacco use was associated with periodontitis and dental caries, while non-combustible tobacco use was associated with dental caries. In addition to conducting extensive oral health screening among all smokers, oral health-care providers should counsel smokers on the need for smoking cessation.

Predictive and Prognostic Effects of Primary Tumor Size on Colorectal Cancer Survival.

BACKGROUND: Pathologic staging is crucial in colorectal cancer (CRC). Unlike the majority of solid tumors, the current staging model does not use tumor size as a criterion. We evaluated the predictive and prognostic impact of primary tumor size on all stages of CRC. METHODS: Using the National Cancer Database (NCDB), we conducted an analysis of CRC patients diagnosed between 2010 and 2015 who underwent resection of their primary cancer. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to identify predictive and prognostic factors, Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox proportional hazards models for association between tumor size and survival. RESULTS: About 61,000 patients met the inclusion criteria. Median age was 63 years and majority of the tumors were colon primary (82.7%). AJCC stage distribution was: I - 20.1%; II - 32.1%; III - 34.7% and IV - 13.1%. The prognostic impact of tumor size was strongly associated with survival in stage III disease. Compared to patients with tumors <2cm; those with 2-5cm (HR 1.33; 1.19-1.49; p<0.001), 5-10cm (HR 1.51 (1.34-1.70; p<0.001) and >10cm (HR 1.95 (1.65-2.31; p<0.001) had worse survival independent of other variables. Stage II treated without adjuvant chemotherapy had comparable survival outcomes (HR 1.09; 0.97-1.523; p=0.148) with stage III patients who did, while Stage II patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy did much better than both groups (HR 0.76; 0.67-0.86; p<0.001). Stage III patients who did not receive adjuvant chemotherapy had the worst outcomes among the non-metastatic disease subgroups (HR 2.66; 2.48-2.86; p<0.001). Larger tumors were associated with advanced stage, MSI high, non-rectal primary and positive resection margins. CONCLUSIONS: Further studies are needed to clarify the role of tumor size in prognostic staging models, and how to incorporate it into therapy decisions.

Reasons for Hospitalization and In-Hospital Mortality in Adult Systemic Lupus Erythematosus.

OBJECTIVE: Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is an autoimmune disease with an increased risk of hospitalization. Multiple studies have reported SLE flare, infection, and cardiovascular (CV) events as the most common reasons for hospitalization. The aim of this study was to use a large US population-based database to comprehensively analyze all indications for adult SLE hospitalization and reasons for in-hospital mortality. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study of SLE hospitalizations in 2017 from the National Inpatient Sample database. The "reason for hospitalization" and "reason for in-hospital mortality" in patients with SLE were divided into 19 categories based on their principal International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-10) diagnosis. RESULTS: A total of 180 975 hospitalizations carried either a principal or secondary ICD-10 code for SLE. The leading reasons for hospitalization were CV (16%), rheumatologic (13%), infectious (11%), respiratory (10%), and gastrointestinal (10%). SLE itself was the principal diagnosis in only 6% of the hospitalizations. In-hospital death occurred in 1 of every 50 SLE hospitalizations. Infectious (37%) and CV diagnoses (21%) were the most common reasons for in-hospital death, with sepsis being the most frequent reason for death. CONCLUSION: This analysis represents the only report to date that comprehensively categorizes the reasons for hospitalization and reasons for in-hospital mortality of patients with SLE on a US national level. SLE itself was the principal diagnosis for only a small percentage of hospitalizations. CV diagnoses were the most common reason for hospitalization. In-hospital death occurred in 1 of every 50 SLE hospitalizations. Infectious and CV diagnoses were the most common reason for in-hospital death.