Placebo-related improvement with methylphenidate treatment in children with ADHD.

Non-specific effects of methylphenidate treatment, including expectancy and regression to the mean effects, contribute to the overall effect of methylphenidate on attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) symptoms. Knowledge on the extent to which non-specific effects contribute to the overall effect and whether regression to the mean explains part of the non-specific effects, is currently lacking. A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, cross-over trial was used to compare parent and teacher ratings of child ADHD symptoms at baseline and during treatment with placebo and 5, 10, 15 and 20 mg of methylphenidate, twice daily. Participants were 5-13-year-old children with a DSM-5 diagnosis of ADHD (N = 45). The extent to which non-specific effects contributed to the effects of methylphenidate was determined by ADHD symptom reductions observed with placebo versus reductions observed with active doses of methylphenidate. The influence of regression to the mean was examined by estimating the contribution of baseline ADHD symptom severity to the effects observed with placebo treatment. Data were analyzed using multilevel analyses. We observed significant non-specific effects of methylphenidate for parent-rated ADHD symptoms, but not for teacher-rated symptoms. For parent reported hyperactive/impulsive symptoms, higher baseline symptoms predicted larger effects with placebo, indicating regression to the mean effects. For parent-reports, a significant part of the overall effect of methylphenidate treatment is explained by non-specific effects. Our findings stress the importance of taking non-specific effects into account when evaluating methylphenidate treatment, by including teacher-reports and using a double baseline assessment during titration. Comparing active medication with a placebo in the titration trial has the potential to identify non-specific effects.

Team functioning in Neurorehabilitation: a mixed methods study.

The objective of this study was to enhance understanding of team functioning in a neurorehabilitation team by identifying the factors that impede and facilitate effective interprofessional team collaboration. We focused on team identification, psychological safety, and team learning, and conducted the research at a neurorehabilitation center treating young patients with severe acquired brain injury in the Netherlands. A mixed-methods approach was employed, integrating quantitative data from questionnaires (N = 40) with qualitative insights from a focus group (n = 6) and in-depth interviews (n = 5) to provide a comprehensive perspective on team dynamics. Findings revealed strong team identification among participants, denoting a shared sense of belonging and commitment. However, limited psychological safety was observed, which negatively affected constructive conflict and team learning. Qualitative analysis further identified deficiencies in shared mental models, especially in shared decision-making and integrated care. These results highlight the crucial role of psychological safety in team learning and the development of shared mental models in neurorehabilitation settings. Although specific to neurorehabilitation, the insights gained may be applicable to enhancing team collaboration in various healthcare environments. The study forms a basis for future research to investigate the impact of improvements in team functioning on patient outcomes in similar settings.

Improving Methylphenidate Titration in Children with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD): A Randomized Controlled Trial Using Placebo-Controlled Titration Implemented in Clinical Practice.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Concerns exist regarding the rising use of methylphenidate. A double-blind, placebo-controlled methylphenidate titration (PCT) for children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) has shown potential to improve titration (i.e., detection of placebo responders and larger ADHD symptom improvement) in experimental settings. This study aims to determine if these advantages can be transferred to clinical settings. METHOD: Children (aged 5-13 years) with an ADHD diagnosis and an indication to start methylphenidate (MPH) treatment were recruited. Participants were randomized to PCT or care as usual (CAU) in a 1:1 ratio followed by a 7-week randomized controlled trial (T1) and 6-month, naturalistic, open-label follow-up (T2). Parents, teachers, and physicians rated ADHD symptoms, ADHD medication use, MPH dosing, and treatment satisfaction using questionnaires. RESULTS: A total of 100 children were enrolled and randomized to PCT (n = 49) or CAU (n = 51). In the PCT group, we found 8.2% placebo responders, 16.3% non-responders, and 65.3% responders to MPH. With PCT compared with CAU, a significantly larger number of children discontinued MPH (T1: 24.5 vs 5.9%, p = 0.009; T2: 41.7 vs 10.4%, p < 0.001) and refrained from using other pharmacological treatment (T1: 20.4 vs 3.9%, p = 0.013; T2: 20.83 vs 6.25%, p = 0.002). At both timepoints, there were no significant differences between the groups in the average dose of MPH, ADHD symptoms, or treatment satisfaction. CONCLUSIONS: PCT can be used to improve detection of children who do not benefit from MPH, and may therefore potentially reduce overtreatment of ADHD with MPH.

Long-Term Neurodevelopmental Outcome of Children With Mild Traumatic Brain Injury.

BACKGROUND: To investigate the long-term outcome of pediatric mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) in terms of neurocognitive, behavioral, and school functioning and to identify clinical risk factors for adverse outcomes. METHODS: This study describes the follow-up of a prospective multicenter sample of 89 children with mTBI 3.6 years postinjury and 89 neurologically healthy children matched for sex, age, and socioeconomic status. Neurodevelopmental outcomes were assessed using an intelligence test, behavioral questionnaires, computerized neurocognitive tests, and longitudinal (pre- and postinjury) standardized school performance data. RESULTS: Children with mTBI exhibited intelligence in the average range but had more behavioral problems related to inattentiveness (P = 0.004, d = 0.47) and hyperactive impulsivity (P = 0.01, d = 0.40) and showed poorer neurocognitive performance in information processing stability (P = 0.003, d = -0.55) and Visual Working Memory (P = 0.04, d = -0.39) compared with matched peers. Longitudinal school performance data revealed poorer performance in Technical Reading up to two years postinjury (P = 0.005, d = -0.42) when compared with normative data. Clinical risk factors did not reveal predictive value for adverse outcomes in children with mTBI. CONCLUSIONS: This study indicates that children with mTBI are at risk of long-term deficits in neurocognitive and behavioral functioning, with longitudinal evidence suggesting shortfalls in school performance up to two years postinjury. Clinical risk factors do not provide a solid basis for long-term neurodevelopmental prognosis. Findings emphasize the importance of, and challenges for, early identification of children at risk for adverse neurodevelopmental outcome after mTBI.

Pharmacotherapy to Improve Cognitive Functioning After Acquired Brain Injury: A Meta-Analysis and Meta-Regression.

Cognitive impairments, common sequelae of acquired brain injury (ABI), significantly affect rehabilitation and quality of life. Currently, there is no solid evidence-base for pharmacotherapy to improve cognitive functioning after ABI, nevertheless off-label use is widely applied in clinical practice. This meta-analysis and meta-regression aims to quantitatively aggregate the available evidence for the effects of pharmacological agents used in the treatment of cognitive impairments following ABI. We conducted a comprehensive search of Embase, Medline Ovid, and Cochrane Controlled Trials Register databases for randomized controlled and crossover trials. Meta-analytic effects were calculated for each pharmaceutical agent and targeted neuromodulator system. Cognitive outcome measures were aggregated across cognitive domains. Of 8,216 articles, 41 studies (4,434 patients) were included. The noradrenergic agent methylphenidate showed a small, significant positive effect on cognitive functioning in patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI; k = 14, d = 0.34, 95% confidence interval: 0.12-0.56, P = 0.003). Specifically, methylphenidate was found to improve cognitive functions related to executive memory, baseline speed, inhibitory control, and variability in responding. The cholinergic drug donepezil demonstrated a large effect size, albeit based on a limited number of studies (k = 3, d = 1.68, P = 0.03). No significant effects were observed for other agents. Additionally, meta-regression analysis did not identify significant sources of heterogeneity in treatment response. Our meta-analysis supports the use of methylphenidate for enhancing cognitive functioning in patients with TBI. Although donepezil shows potential, it warrants further research. These results could guide clinical decision making, inform practice guidelines, and direct future pharmacotherapeutic research in ABI.