Preventing Sudden Cessation of Implantable Pulse Generators in Deep Brain Stimulation: A Systematic Review and Protocol Proposal.

INTRODUCTION: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) requires a consistent electrical supply from the implantable pulse generator (IPG). Patients may struggle to monitor their IPG, risking severe complications in battery failure. This review assesses current literature on DBS IPG battery life management and proposes a protocol for healthcare providers. METHODS: A literature search using four databases identified best practices for DBS IPG management. Studies were appraised for IPG management guidelines, categorized as qualitative, quantitative, or both. RESULTS: Of 408 citations, only seven studies were eligible, none providing clear patient management strategies. Current guidelines lack specificity, relying on clinician suggestions. CONCLUSION: Limited guidelines exist for IPG management. Specificity and adaptability to emerging technology are crucial. The findings highlight the need for specificity in patients' needs and adaptability to emerging technology in future studies. To address this need, we developed a protocol for DBS IPG management that we have implemented at our own institution. Further research is needed for effective DBS IPG battery life management, preventing therapy cessation complications.

Systematic reviews and meta-analyses in the cerebrovascular space: essential domains for readers.

INTRODUCTION: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (SRMAs) in neurosurgery have significantly increased. With approximately 1 million patients affected by cerebrovascular disease annually, interpreting SRMAs necessitates a systematic approach. The objective of this review is to identify and describe four essential domains for SRMA interpretation. METHODS: This review outlines the necessities of reviewing existing literature and methodological frameworks essential for interpreting cerebrovascular neurosurgery SRMAs. Each domain is to accurately assess study design variations, heterogeneity assessment methods, outcome comparability strategies, and the impact of technological advancements and time bias on study outcomes. RESULTS: Study design evaluation distinguishes between randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and non-randomized studies. RCTs provide high internal validity, but as seen in the ARUBA trial, can contain internal flaws that necessitate a deeper understanding before application to clinical practices. Non-randomized studies offer valuable real-world insights. A heterogeneity assessment involves readers and writers accurately using forest plots, Cochrane's Q test, Higgins I² statistics, subgroup analysis, and meta-regressions to understand a study's clinical findings. The expertise thresholds, as in the NASCET trial, significantly impact a study's external validity. Strategies such as the GRADE approach can assist in managing diverse outcome measures. Technological advancements, particularly in endovascular procedures and SRS, influence the accuracy of comparing studies across periods, and thus swiftly outdate older studies, lowering the applicability of SRMAs. CONCLUSION: Effective interpretation of cerebrovascular neurosurgery SRMAs requires attention to study design, heterogeneity, outcome comparability, and technological advancements. These domains collectively enable evidence-based clinical decision-making and optimized patient care in a dynamic field.

Acute Macrocystic Thoracic Schwannoma: Systematic Review and Illustrative Case Example.

BACKGROUND: Schwannomas are benign peripheral nerve sheath tumors arising from myelinating Schwann cells. Although macrocystic changes are regularly encountered in schwannoma variants such as vestibular nerve tumors, they are exceedingly rare among spinal neoplasms. METHODS: Case report and systematic review of 4 databases (Ovid Medline, PubMed, Science Direct, and SCOPUS) from inception to present. All peer-reviewed publications reporting intradural cystic thoracic schwannoma were included. RESULTS: We identified 8 publications documenting 9 cases of cystic thoracic schwannoma. Four were female, 5 male; median age was 41 years (range, 27-80). Presentations ranged from incidental to pain, sensory changes, lower extremity paresis, or bowel/bladder dysfunction. Characteristic radiographic findings included T1 hypointensity, T2 hyperintensity, and cord effacement or compression. The present case followed a similar pattern: a 52-year-old male presented with worsening bilateral lower extremity weakness, low back pain, and gait dysfunction, worsening over 3 days. Examination also revealed decreased left lower extremity sensation. Imaging identified a well-delineated intradural, extramedullary macrocystic extending over T7-T10. The patient underwent a laminectomy resulting in complete tumor resection and restoration of intact neurologic function. Final pathology confirmed benign cystic schwannoma. CONCLUSIONS: Macrocystic thoracic schwannomas are exceedingly rare and lack a comprehensive scheme for clinical classification of their natural history and pathogenesis. We report the 10th case of such a schwannoma, and the first associated systematic review. Although macrocystic thoracic schwannomas are not frequently encountered, accurate diagnosis and appropriate neurosurgical treatment is critical in these vulnerable patients, given the opportunity for excellent functional outcomes following neurosurgical treatment.