Effects of Vibration Therapy on the Physical Function of Critically Ill Adults Trial: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

OBJECTIVES: Vibration therapy uses vibration to rehabilitate physical functions. Recently, it has been demonstrated to be safe for critically ill patients. However, its effects on physical functions are unclear. DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial. SETTING: A single-center, ICU. PATIENTS: Patients were randomly assigned to either vibration therapy coupled with protocolized mobilization or protocolized mobilization alone. We included patients who could sit at the edge of the bed or in a wheelchair during their ICU stay. The exclusion criteria were based on the early mobilization inhibition criteria. INTERVENTIONS: The primary outcome was the Functional Status Score for the ICU (FSS-ICU) at ICU discharge. Secondary outcomes were the Medical Research Council score, ICU-acquired weakness, delirium, ICU Mobility Scale (IMS), and ventilator- and ICU-free days. For safety assessment, vital signs were monitored during the intervention. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Among 180 patients, 86 and 90 patients remained in the vibration therapy and control groups, respectively. The mean age was 69 ± 13 vs. 67 ± 16 years in the vibration therapy and control groups, and the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II score was 19 (14-25) vs. 18 (13-23). The total FSS-ICU at ICU discharge was 24 (18-27) and 21 (17-26) in the intervention and control groups, respectively ( p = 0.09), and the supine-to-sit ability significantly improved in the intervention group ( p < 0.01). The secondary outcomes were not significantly different. Vital signs remained stable during vibration therapy. In the predefined subgroup analysis, FSS-ICU improved in the population with a higher body mass index (≥ 23 kg/m 2 ), lower APACHE II scores (< 19), and higher IMS scores (≥ 6). CONCLUSIONS: Vibration therapy did not improve the total FSS-ICU. However, the supine-to-sit ability in the FSS-ICU improved without any adverse event.

The Utility of Urinary Titin to Diagnose and Predict the Prognosis of Acute Myocardial Infarction.

Early detection and management are crucial for better prognosis in acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Serum titin, a component of the sarcomere in cardiac and skeletal muscle, was associated with AMI. Thus, we hypothesized that urinary N-fragment titin may be a biomarker for its diagnosis and prognosis. Between January 2021 and November 2021, we prospectively enrolled 83 patients with suspected AMI. Their urinary N-fragment titin, serum high-sensitivity troponin I (hsTnI), creatine kinase (CK), and creatine kinase-MB (CK-MB) were measured on admission. Then, urinary titin was assessed as diagnostic and prognostic biomarker in AMI. Among 83 enrolled patients, 51 patients were diagnosed as AMI. In AMI patients who were admitted as early as 3 h or longer after symptom onset, their urinary titin levels were significantly higher than non-AMI patients who are also admitted 3 h or longer after symptom onset (12.76 [IQR 5.87-16.68] pmol/mgCr (creatinine) and 5.13 [IQR 3.93-11.25] pmol/mgCr, p = 0.045, respectively). Moreover, the urinary titin levels in patients who died during hospitalization were incredibly higher than in those who were discharged (15.90 [IQR 13.46-22.61] pmol/mgCr and 4.90 [IQR 3.55-11.95] pmol/mgCr, p = 0.023). Urinary N-fragment titin can be used as non-invasive early diagnostic biomarker in AMI. Furthermore, it associates with hospital discharge disposition, providing prognostic utility.

Ultrasonographic Assessment of the Diaphragm.

Mechanical ventilation injures not only the lungs but also the diaphragm, resulting in dysfunction associated with poor outcomes. Diaphragm ultrasonography is a noninvasive, cost-effective, and reproducible diagnostic method used to monitor the condition and function of the diaphragm. With advances in ultrasound technology and the expansion of its clinical applications, diaphragm ultrasonography has become increasingly important as a tool to visualize and quantify diaphragmatic morphology and function across multiple medical specialties, including pulmonology, critical care, and rehabilitation medicine. This comprehensive review aims to provide an in-depth analysis of the role and limitations of ultrasonography in assessing the diaphragm, especially among critically ill patients. Furthermore, we discuss a recently published expert consensus and provide a perspective for the future.

Utility of Lean Body Mass Equations and Body Mass Index for Predicting Outcomes in Critically Ill Adults with Sepsis: A Retrospective Study.

Lean body mass is a significant component of survival from sepsis. Several equations can be used for calculating lean body mass based on age, sex, body weight, and height. We hypothesized that lean body mass is a better predictor of outcomes than the body mass index (BMI). This study used a multicenter cohort study database. The inclusion criteria were age ≥18 years and a diagnosis of sepsis or septic shock. BMI was classified into four categories: underweight (<18.5 kg/m2), normal (≥18.5-<25 kg/m2), overweight (≥25-<30 kg/m2), and obese (≥30 kg/m2). Four lean body mass equations were used and categorized on the basis of quartiles. The outcome was in-hospital mortality among different BMI and lean body mass groups. Among 85,558 patients, 3916 with sepsis were included in the analysis. Regarding BMI, in-hospital mortality was 36.9%, 29.8%, 26.7%, and 27.9% in patients who were underweight, normal weight, overweight, and obese, respectively (p < 0.01). High lean body mass did not show decreased mortality in all four equations. In critically ill patients with sepsis, BMI was a better predictor of in-hospital mortality than the lean body mass equation at intensive care unit (ICU) admission. To precisely predict in-hospital mortality, ICU-specific lean body mass equations are needed.

Value of the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) score in predicting hospital mortality for postoperative brain tumor patients in intensive care units in Japan: A retrospective case-control study.

OBJECTIVE: Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) is based on the data of intensive care unit (ICU) patients and often correlates with disease severity and prognosis. However, no prognostic predictors exist based on ICU admission data for patients with brain tumors, and no studies have reported an association between APACHE II and prognosis in patients with brain tumors. The Japanese Intensive Care Patients Database (JIPAD) was established to improve the quality of care delivered in intensive care medicine in Japan. We used JIPAD to examine factors associated with in-hospital mortality based on available data of postoperative patients with brain tumors admitted to the ICU. METHODS: Patients aged ≥16 years enrolled in JIPAD between April 2015 and March 2018 after surgical brain tumor resection or biopsy of brain tumors. We examined factors related to outcomes at discharge based on blood tests and medical procedures performed during ICU admission, tumor type, and APACHE II score. RESULTS: Among the 1454 patients (male:female ratio: 1:1.1, mean age: 62 years) in the study, 32 (2.2 %) died during hospital stay. In multivariate analysis, male sex (odds ratio [OR] 2.70, [95 % confidence interval, CI 1.22-6.00]), malignant tumor (OR 2.51 [95 % CI 1.13-5.55]), and APACHE II score ≥15 (OR 2.51 [95 % CI 3.08-14.3]) were significantly associated with in-hospital mortality. CONCLUSION: By picking up cases with a high risk of in-hospital death at an early stage, it is possible to improve methods of treatment and support for the patient's family.