Mean glandular dose in the mammary gland and dose of radiation in the thyroid gland and lens in women with and without breast implants during different modalities of mammography.

There have always been concerns about the secondary effects of diagnostic methods that use ionizing radiation. During mammography, the parameters to be concerned about are the mean glandular dose and the scatter dose. We evaluated the dose of radiation to the breast, thyroid gland, and lens in digital mammography in women with and without implants, in tomosynthesis in women with and without implants, and in contrast-enhanced mammography. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study included 212 women with and without disease who were attended at the Centro Clínico de Estereotaxia, CECLINES, in Caracas, Venezuela, between June 2017 and August 2017; the women were classified into five groups according to the mammographic modality used to evaluate them and whether or not they had implants. The statistical analysis included descriptive statistics for the study population. We used the Mann-Whitney U to compare the mean glandular dose and dose in the thyroid gland and lens between groups. RESULTS: The mean glandular dose and the dose of radiation received in the thyroid and lens were within the acceptable range. In a few exceptions, the mean glandular dose per view was slightly higher than 3 mGy. The scatter dose to the thyroid gland and the lens during mammography has a very small contribution to the annual dose equivalent. CONCLUSION: The mean glandular dose and the scatter dose to the thyroid gland and lens delivered during tomosynthesis and 2D mammography in women with implants were higher than those delivered during other mammographic techniques in women without implants.

Mean glandular dose in the mammary gland and dose of radiation in the thyroid gland and lens in women with and without breast implants during different modalities of mammography. / Dosis glandular promedio en glándula mamaria y dosis de radiación en glándula tiroides y cristalino en mujeres con y sin implantes mamarios durante diferentes modalidades mamográficas.

There have always been concerns about the secondary effects of diagnostic methods that use ionizing radiation. During mammography, the parameters to be concerned about are the mean glandular dose and the scatter dose. We evaluated the dose of radiation to the breast, thyroid gland, and lens in digital mammography in women with and without implants, in tomosynthesis in women with and without implants, and in contrast-enhanced mammography. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study included 212 women with and without disease who were attended at the Centro Clínico de Estereotaxia, CECLINES, in Caracas, Venezuela, between June 2017 and August 2017; the women were classified into five groups according to the mammographic modality used to evaluate them and whether or not they had implants. The statistical analysis included descriptive statistics for the study population. We used the Mann-Whitney U to compare the mean glandular dose and dose in the thyroid gland and lens between groups. RESULTS: The mean glandular dose and the dose of radiation received in the thyroid and lens were within the acceptable range. In a few exceptions, the mean glandular dose per view was slightly higher than 3mGy. The scatter dose to the thyroid gland and the lens during mammography has a very small contribution to the annual dose equivalent. CONCLUSION: The mean glandular dose and the scatter dose to the thyroid gland and lens delivered during tomosynthesis and 2D mammography in women with implants were higher than those delivered during other mammographic techniques in women without implants.

Sonographically guided directional vacuum-assisted breast biopsy: preliminary experience in Venezuela.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the use of sonographically guided directional vacuum-assisted biopsy in the histologic diagnosis of breast lesions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eighty-eight lesions in 83 women underwent sonographically guided 11-gauge directional vacuum-assisted breast biopsy during a 26-month period. Biopsies were performed using high-resolution sonography equipment with a 7.5-MHz transducer, obtaining a median of 17 specimens per lesion. Imaging studies, medical records, and histologic findings were reviewed. RESULTS: Median patient age was 48 years (range, 25-78 years). Median lesion size was 1.2 cm (range, 0.4-2.5 cm). Twenty-four (27.3%) of 88 lesions were palpable. The median time required to perform biopsy was 17 min (range, 10-40 min). Complete removal of the lesion seen at sonography occurred in 78 (88.6%) of 88 lesions and was significantly more frequent in lesions measuring 1.5 cm or less than in larger lesions (68/71 = 95.8% vs 10/17 = 58.8%,p < 0.0003). A surgical procedure was spared in 79 (95.2%) of 83 women. In 36 lesions with imaging and clinical follow-up after sonographically guided biopsy with benign findings (range, 4-24 months; median, 11.3 months), we found no evidence of cancer or scarring in the breast. CONCLUSION: In our small series, sonographically guided directional vacuum-assisted biopsy was a fast and accurate method for breast diagnosis. This technique resulted in complete removal of 95.8% of lesions shown at sonography measuring 1.5 cm or less and spared a surgical procedure in 95.2% of women. Further work is necessary to refine indications, evaluate cost-effectiveness, and assess long-term outcome.