Long-term outcomes of pediatric and adolescent mediastinal germ cell tumors: a single pediatric oncology institutional experience.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the epidemiologic, demographic, and clinical characteristics, as well as prognostic factors and long-term outcomes of mediastinal germ cell tumors (MGCT) in children. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective study of pediatric patients diagnosed with a primary MGCT between January 1963 and August of 2014 was performed. RESULTS: Twenty-five patients were identified. Six children with teratomas were treated with resection alone (median age 7.8 years, range newborn to 15 years) and were cured without recurrence or progression. Nineteen children were treated for a malignant MGCT (median age 11.7 years, range 7 months-18 years); 5 year overall survival (OS) was 0.39 ± 0.12. For malignant non-seminomatous mediastinal germ cell tumors, platinum-based chemotherapy regimen (OS 0.56 vs 0.14, p = 0.03), complete surgical resection with negative margins (OS 0.73 vs 0.11, p = 0.03); and localized disease (OS 0.76 vs 0.0, p = 0.004) demonstrated a survival advantage. CONCLUSIONS: Initial surgical resection is appropriate for teratomas. Localized disease, complete resection, and platinum-based chemotherapy are associated with improved survival in malignant non-seminomatous mediastinal germ cell tumors. Neoadjuvant, platinum-based three drug regimens followed by delayed surgical resection is the appropriate treatment modality for malignant mediastinal germ cell tumors.

Melanoma as a subsequent neoplasm in adult survivors of childhood cancer: a report from the childhood cancer survivor study.

BACKGROUND: Childhood cancer survivors have a sixfold increased risk of developing subsequent neoplasms when compared to the general population. We sought to describe the occurrence of melanoma as a subsequent neoplasm among adult survivors of childhood cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Among 14,358 5-year survivors of childhood cancer diagnosed between 1970 and 1986, we calculated the cumulative incidence, standardized incidence ratio (SIR), and absolute excess risk (AER) of subsequent melanoma. Potential risk factors were assessed using a cause-specific hazards model. RESULTS: Fifty-seven melanomas (46 invasive, 2 ocular, and 9 in situ) occurred in 51 survivors. The median time to the development of melanoma was 21.0 years (range: 5.6-35.4 years) and the median age at melanoma was 32.3 years (range: 10.9-49.0 years). Initial cancer diagnoses included soft tissue and bone sarcoma (n = 15), leukemia (13), lymphoma (14), central nervous system malignancy (5), Wilms tumor (3), and neuroblastoma (1). The cumulative incidence of first subsequent melanoma at 35 years from initial cancer diagnosis was 0.55% [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.37-0.73]. The SIR of subsequent invasive malignant melanoma of the skin was 2.42 (95% CI: 1.77-3.23), and the AER was 0.10 (95% CI: 0.05-0.15) per 1,000 person-years. No statistically significant associations were found between melanoma risk and family history of cancer, demographic, or treatment-related factors. CONCLUSION: Survivors of childhood cancer have an approximate 2.5-fold increased risk of melanoma. Early screening and prevention strategies are warranted.

Adaptive Proton Therapy for Pediatric Parameningeal Rhabdomyosarcoma: On-Treatment Anatomic Changes and Timing to Replanning.

PURPOSE: To characterize on-treatment changes in GTV morphology in children with parameningeal rhabdomyosarcoma receiving upfront proton therapy with concurrent chemotherapy and thereby provide guidance on the timing of on-treatment imaging and adaptive replanning. METHODS AND MATERIALS: GTV was delineated on 86 simulation and weekly MR images of 15 prospectively enrolled patients (aged 1-21 years). Temporal changes from baseline in volume and surface (95% Hausdorff distance) were analyzed in relation to the need for plan verification and the resultant doses with hypothetical no treatment adaptation. RESULTS: The median time was 6 days from the initiation of chemotherapy to CT+MR simulation and 15 days from the simulation to the start of radiotherapy. All but 1 patient showed a continuous decrease in GTV (0.16-1.52%/day) after simulation. At 3 weeks from simulation, 10 of 15 patients exhibited a significant reduction in volume (median, 20%; range, 6-29%). Without replanning, these changes could lead to a reduction in CTV V95 by 7-14% (n = 2) and/or an increase in D0.01 cc/Dmean of adjacent organs at risk by 6-21% of the prescribed target dose (n = 7). Significant dosimetric consequences occurred in cases with (1) a considerable weight gain, (2) shrinkage of the skin surface, or (3) tumor regression in the oral or nasal cavity and sinus that altered air-tissue components in the beam path. The subsequent GTV and dosimetry after 3 weeks from simulation (4 weeks from chemotherapy initiation) demonstrated a relatively stable trend. CONCLUSIONS: On-treatment imaging at 3 weeks after simulation is recommended, if the simulation is performed at 1 week after the initiation of chemotherapy, to detect significant anatomic changes that could result in >5% deviation from planned target coverage and/or organ doses in pediatric patients with parameningeal rhabdomyosarcoma receiving early proton therapy.

Long-term functional outcomes and quality of life in adult survivors of childhood extremity sarcomas: a report from the St. Jude Lifetime Cohort Study.

PURPOSE: This study compared measured physical performance, health-related quality of life (HRQOL), and social role attainment between extremity sarcoma survivors and controls, and evaluated associations between disease and treatment exposures, health conditions, and performance measures. METHODS: Survivors of extremity sarcoma from the St. Jude Lifetime cohort and controls frequency matched by age-, sex-, and race completed physical performance testing and questionnaires. Survivors with Z-scores on outcome measures ≤ -2.0 SD (compared to controls) were categorized with severe impairment/limitation. RESULTS: Among 206 survivors (52.4 % male median age 36 years (range 19-65)), 37 % had low relative lean mass, 9.7 % had an ejection fraction <50 %, 51.5 % had diffusion capacity for carbon monoxide <75 %, 27.7 % had sensory and 25.2 % motor neuropathy, and 78.2 % had musculoskeletal complications. Severe impairments/limitations were present among ≥25 % of survivors on fitness, balance, and physical HRQOL measures, and among ≥15 % on strength and activity of daily living measures. Lower extremity tumor location (OR 8.23, 95 % CI 2.54-26.67, P value 0.0004) and amputation (OR 8.07, 95 % CI 3.06-21.27, P value <0.0001) were associated with poor fitness. Poor fitness was associated with increased odds of scoring <40 on the SF-36 physical component summary (OR 4.83, 95 % CI 1.95-11.99, P value 0.001) and role-physical subscale (OR 3.34, 95 % CI 1.33-8.43, P value 0.01). Survivors and controls had similar rates of marriage, independent living, employment, and college attendance. CONCLUSIONS: Extremity sarcoma survivors experience high rates of physical impairment and report lower than expected physical HRQOL. However, they are as likely as peers to be married, live independently, be employed, and attend college. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: Follow-up for extremity sarcoma survivors should include assessment of need for further orthopedic care and rehabilitation to address cardiopulmonary and musculoskeletal health.

Biology and therapy of pediatric rhabdomyosarcoma.

PURPOSE: To review key developments in biology and therapy of rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) since the early 1970s. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The literature regarding biology, therapy, and late effects of therapy through March 1995 was reviewed. RESULTS: The two major histiotypes, embryonal and alveolar, are characterized by specific genetic abnormalities that provide clues to mechanisms of tumor induction. Alveolar tumors, for example, often possess a chromosomal translocation [t(2;13)(q35;q14)] that fuses the PAX3 gene in band 2q35 with the FKHR gene in band 13q14, creating a novel chimeric protein that could inappropriately activate normal targets of the PAX3 gene product, thereby contributing to tumorigenesis. Recognition of prognostically important patient groups primarily identified by tumor extent, site, and histology, and development of effective risk-based multimodal therapy in randomized trials, have increased long-term survival in RMS from 25% in 1970 to more than 70% in current studies. The most significant recent gain in therapeutic results was realized in patients with gross residual tumor after biopsy. CONCLUSION: Contemporary risk-based therapy cures more than two thirds of children with RMS while minimizing acute and late effects. Increased dose-intensity of known effective agents with hematopoietic growth factor support, new agents, and hyperfractionated irradiation are being evaluated in hopes of further improving therapy. Recent discovery of novel genetic features in this tumor should lead to better methods of diagnosis and risk assessment, and ultimately to identification of molecular targets for specific treatment.

Up-front window trial of topotecan in previously untreated children and adolescents with metastatic rhabdomyosarcoma: an intergroup rhabdomyosarcoma study.

PURPOSE: To investigate the antitumor activity and toxicity of topotecan, used alone and in combination with conventional therapy, in patients with metastatic rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-eight patients younger than 21 years of age with newly diagnosed metastatic RMS received 2.0 to 2.4 mg/m(2) of topotecan intravenously daily for 5 days every 21 days before standard therapy. Two courses were given in the absence of progressive disease or excessive toxicity and response was assessed. Patients with at least a partial response (PR) to topotecan proceeded to therapy with alternating courses of vincristine 1.5 mg/m(2), dactinomycin 1.5 mg/m(2), and cyclophosphamide 2.2 g/m(2) (VAC) and vincristine 1.5 mg/m(2), topotecan 0.75 mg/m(2) daily x 5, and cyclophosphamide 250 mg/m(2) daily x 5. Patients who did not respond to topotecan received continuation therapy with VAC alone. RESULTS: The overall response rate to topotecan was 46% (complete response, 4%; partial response 42%). Unexpectedly, patients with alveolar RMS had a higher rate of response (65%) than those with embryonal RMS (28%; P: = .08). The most common grade 3 or 4 toxicities were neutropenia (67%), anemia (33%), thrombocytopenia (25%), and infection (21%). Two-year failure-free survival and survival estimates were 24% and 46%, respectively. Response to window therapy did not correlate with survival. CONCLUSION: The high response rate and acceptable toxicity profile of topotecan in children with advanced RMS support further evaluation of this agent in phase III trials. The superior responses in alveolar RMS are of interest.

Synovial sarcoma in children and adolescents: the St Jude Children's Research Hospital experience.

PURPOSE AND METHODS: We reviewed the clinical records and pathologic findings of 37 children and adolescents with synovial sarcoma treated at our institution over a 30-year period to evaluate the prognostic significance of tumor size, invasiveness, histology, and other features. RESULTS: The 20 male and 17 female patients with synovial sarcoma had a median age of 13.7 years at diagnosis. Primary tumor sites were the extremities (n = 27), trunk (n = 8), and head and neck (n = 2). Disease stage (clinical group) was as follows: group I, n = 21; group II, n = 7; group III, n = 4; and group IV, n = 5. Nineteen patients had invasive (T2) lesions, 20 had tumors more than 5 cm in diameter, and 14 had histologic grade 3 lesions. The estimated 5-year survival rate (+/- SE) for patients with group I or II disease was 80% +/- 9%, compared with 17% +/- 15% for those with group III or IV tumors (P = .0003). An exact log-rank test, adjusted for clinical group, showed that tumor invasiveness and grade independently predicted overall and progression-free survival (P < .05); tumor size was significantly correlated with progression-free survival. A borderline significant relationship with overall survival was found for both tumor size and histologic subtype (P = .09). CONCLUSION: A controlled trial of adjuvant chemotherapy is merited in children with resected synovial sarcoma (clinical group I or II) who present with unfavorable clinicopathologic features such as large, invasive, or grade 3 lesions. Children with unresected or metastatic disease fare poorly despite multimodality therapy and require novel treatment approaches.

Improved outcome for patients with middle ear rhabdomyosarcoma: a children's oncology group study.

PURPOSE: The goal of this study was to define the clinical features and optimal therapy for children and adolescents with middle ear (ME) rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS). PATIENTS AND METHODS: We reviewed demographic data, clinical features, therapy (including chemotherapy, surgery, and radiation), and outcome for the 179 eligible patients with ME RMS who were enrolled onto Intergroup Rhabdomyosarcoma Studies (IRS) I through IV or pilot studies between November 1972 and December 1997. RESULTS: Most patients were younger than 10 years old (90%), and 63% were male. Because of the parameningeal location, most tumors were not resected before chemotherapy (group I, < 1%; group II, 4%; group III, 84%; group IV, 12%). Although most tumors were locally invasive (T2, 89%), the majority were small (< or = 5 cm, 66%), lacked nodal metastases (N0, 86%), and had embryonal histology (85%). The 5-year failure-free survival (FFS) and overall survival (OS) estimates were 67% and 72%, respectively. Both FFS and OS improved significantly over the course of IRS I through IV (3-year FFS and OS: IRS-I, 42% and 42%; IRS-II, 70% and 74%; IRS-III, 65% and 72%; IRS-IV pilot, 81% and 96%; IRS-IV, 88% and 88%, P <.001). Lower clinical group or stage and smaller tumor size were associated with better outcome. Age, sex, tumor invasiveness, and nodal metastases were not predictive of outcome. CONCLUSION: Patients with ME RMS generally present with small, unresectable, invasive tumors at a site traditionally considered prognostically unfavorable. Nevertheless, such patients have benefited markedly from improvements in multimodal, risk-based therapy during the course of IRS I through IV, and with contemporary therapy, most are cured.

Chemotherapy dose-intensification for pediatric patients with Ewing's family of tumors and desmoplastic small round-cell tumors: a feasibility study at St. Jude Children's Research Hospital.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the feasibility of dose-intensification for patients with Ewing's family of tumors (EFT) and desmoplastic small round-cell tumors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From February 1992 to June 1996, we treated 53 consecutive patients on our Ewing's protocol. Induction comprised three cycles of ifosfamide/etoposide on days 1 to 3 and cyclophosphamide (CTX)/doxorubicin on day 5, followed by granulocyte colony-stimulating factor. Local control using surgery and/or radiotherapy started at week 9 along with vincristine/dactinomycin. Maintenance included four alternating cycles of ifosfamide/etoposide and doxorubicin/CTX, with randomization to one of two CTX dose levels to determine the feasibility of dose-intensification during maintenance. RESULTS: Patients had a median age of 13.4 years (range, 4.5 to 24.9 years); 34 patients were male and 43 patients were white. Nineteen patients presented with metastatic disease, 29 had tumors greater than 8 cm in diameter, and 26 had primary bone tumors. These patients received 155 induction cycles, 91% of which resulted in grade 4 neutropenia, 68% in febrile neutropenia, and 68% in grade 3 to 4 thrombocytopenia. During maintenance, grade 4 neutropenia and grade 3 to 4 thrombocytopenia occurred in 81% and 85% of cycles, respectively. Thirty-five patients (66%) completed all therapy, only 13 without significant delays; three developed secondary myeloid malignancies. The toxicity and time to therapy completion were similar in both CTX arms. Estimated 3-year survival and event-free survival were 72%+/-8% and 60%+/-9%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Although intensifying therapy seems feasible for 25% of patients on this study, toxicity was considerable. Therefore, the noninvestigational use of dose-intensification in patients with EFT should await assessment of its impact on disease-free survival.

Tumor-cell DNA content predicts outcome in children and adolescents with clinical group III embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma. The Intergroup Rhabdomyosarcoma Study Committee of the Children's Cancer Group and the Pediatric Oncology Group.

PURPOSE: The prognostic value of tumor-cell DNA content (ploidy) was evaluated in children with unresectable, nonmetastic rhabdomyosarcoma of embryonal histology. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Flow-cytometric techniques were used to estimate the ploidy of tumor specimens from 34 patients with embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma who were enrolled in the intergroup rhabdomyosarcoma study III (IRS III) from 1985 to 1991. Tumors were classified as diploid or hyperdiploid (DNA content, 1.1 to 1.8 times that of normal diploid cells). The influence of ploidy on clinical outcome was assessed by the Kaplan-Meier technique and Cox regression analysis with stepwise selection. RESULTS: Twelve of the tumor specimens were diploid and 22 were hyperdiploid. The patient groups defined by diploid or hyperdiploid tumors had similar presenting characteristics (eg, age, tumor size, and anatomic site). Significantly more children with hyperdiploid tumors achieved a complete response than did children with diploid tumors (85% v 42%; P = .01). The probability of progression-free survival at 5 years (+/- SE) was 91% +/- 6% for the hyperdiploid group, compared with 17% +/- 11% for the diploid group (P < .001). Hyperdiploidy was also associated with a significantly higher overall survival rate at 5 years: 96% +/- 4% versus 50% +/- 14% (P = .004). Ploidy retained its prognostic significance after adjustment for tumor site in the Cox regression model. CONCLUSION: Tumor-cell ploidy strongly correlates with outcome in children with nonmetastic, unresectable embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma. The two biologically distinct groups identified by this measure would benefit from further refinements in risk-directed therapy.

Role of adjuvant chemotherapy in the treatment of surgically resected pediatric nonrhabdomyosarcomatous soft tissue sarcomas: A Pediatric Oncology Group Study.

PURPOSE: To prospectively study the value of adjuvant chemotherapy in pediatric patients with surgically resected nonrhabdomyosarcomatous soft tissue sarcomas (NRSTS). PATIENTS AND METHODS: From June 1986 to May 1992, after complete surgical resection (+/-radiotherapy) of their NRSTS, 81 eligible patients either received adjuvant chemotherapy comprising vincristine, dactinomycin, cyclophosphamide, and doxorubicin or were observed. Only 30 patients accepted randomization, and 15 were assigned to each regimen. Of the remaining 51 patients, 19 elected adjuvant chemotherapy and 32 elected observation. RESULTS: Patients were predominantly male, and 69% of all patients were white. The median age at diagnosis was 12.3 years (range, 9.2 to 20.7 years). For the 81 eligible patients, the 5-year overall survival estimate was 84.5% +/- 4.4% and event-free survival was 72.2% +/- 5.4%. Among randomized patients, the 5-year estimated overall survival rate was 93.3% +/- 7%, and the event-free survival rate was 86.7% +/- 9.5% for the observation group, compared with 69.2% +/- 13% and 40.7% +/- 14%, respectively, for those who received chemotherapy. The significantly worse outcome of patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy disappeared when survival was stratified by tumor grade. Among all patients, a grade 3 lesion conferred a significant disadvantage with respect to event-free survival (P =.0001). CONCLUSION: The administration of adjuvant chemotherapy according to the schedule and dosages used in our trial did not improve the outcome of children with resected NRSTS. In this study, tumor grade was the most important predictor of clinical outcome in patients with resected NRSTS, and this factor should be incorporated into the stratification of patients in future trials.

Carboplatin/ifosfamide window therapy for osteosarcoma: results of the St Jude Children's Research Hospital OS-91 trial.

PURPOSE: To determine the activity of carboplatin/ifosfamide in patients with previously untreated osteosarcoma and to estimate patient outcomes after a multiagent chemotherapy protocol that eliminated cisplatin. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Sixty-nine patients with newly diagnosed, previously untreated osteosarcoma received three cycles of carboplatin (560 mg/m(2) x 1) and ifosfamide (2.65 g/m(2)/d x 3). Assessment of response was evaluated after two (week 6) and three (week 9) chemotherapy cycles. At week 9, histologic response was assessed. Adjuvant therapy comprised two additional carboplatin/ifosfamide cycles, doxorubicin, and high-dose methotrexate. Patients were stratified at enrollment: stratum A, resectable primary tumor without metastases; stratum B, unresectable primary tumor; and stratum C, metastatic disease at diagnosis. Week 6 response was compared with that of a historic group that received only ifosfamide during the initial window evaluation. RESULTS: The clinical and radiographic response rate to three cycles of carboplatin/ifosfamide was 67.7% (95% confidence interval, 55.0% to 78.8%). Compared with the historic population who received only ifosfamide, the combination of carboplatin and ifosfamide reduced the progressive disease rate at week 6 (31.9% v 9%, P: = .003). For patients in stratum A, the 3-year event-free survival and survival were 72.3% +/- 6.7% and 76.4% +/- 6.4%, respectively. Patients who received carboplatin-based therapy had less long-term renal toxicity and ototoxicity. CONCLUSION: This pilot trial suggests that carboplatin/ifosfamide combination chemotherapy has substantial antitumor activity. In the context of a multiagent chemotherapy protocol comprising high-dose methotrexate and doxorubicin, we found that the addition of carboplatin/ifosfamide resulted in patient outcomes comparable to trials using cisplatin-based therapy with less long-term toxicity.

P-glycoprotein expression at diagnosis may not be a primary mechanism of therapeutic failure in childhood rhabdomyosarcoma.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the prognostic significance of tumor cell P-glycoprotein (Pgp) expression at diagnosis in children with rhabdomyosarcoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A panel of three anti-Pgp monoclonal antibodies (mAb) (C219, C494, and JSB-1) that recognize different Pgp epitopes was used to measure Pgp expression in rhabdomyosarcoma specimens obtained at diagnosis from 76 patients treated at St Jude Children's Research Hospital from 1969 to 1991. Two separate experiments using different immunohistochemical methods (immune alkaline phosphatase and immunoperoxidase) were performed to evaluate Pgp expression. The immunostaining was graded using a semiquantitative scale corresponding to the percentage of tumor cells with detectable staining. The influence of Pgp expression on outcome was assessed by the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox regression analysis with stepwise selection. The relationship between Pgp expression and clinical features was assessed using the Mantel-Haenszel method. RESULTS: Pgp expression at diagnosis did not predict worse overall survival or progression-free survival when tested in either experiment with C219, C494, or JSB-1 separately. No association was shown between Pgp expression and clinical features (clinical group, primary site, or histology) or response. However, in the immune alkaline phosphatase experiment, patients whose tumors had more than 10% tumor cell staining with all three mAbs had a significantly higher rate of estimated 5-year survival (78% +/- 10%) than did all other patients (38% +/- 8%; P = .025). In this instance, Pgp expression had independent prognostic value after adjusting for clinical group. CONCLUSION: We found no strong association between Pgp expression at diagnosis and clinical features or extent of disease in pediatric rhabdomyosarcoma. Depending on the criteria used to define it, high Pgp expression at diagnosis does not predict poor outcome. Although a large prospective study is needed to provide definitive conclusions, our findings suggest that Pgp-mediated multidrug resistance may not be a primary mechanism of therapeutic failure in rhabdomyosarcoma.

Survival after relapse in children and adolescents with rhabdomyosarcoma: A report from the Intergroup Rhabdomyosarcoma Study Group.

BACKGROUND: Despite advances in therapy, nearly 30% of children with rhabdomyosarcoma experience progressive or relapsed disease, which is often fatal. PATIENTS AND METHODS: To facilitate the development of a retrieval therapy protocol, we studied potential risk factors that were predictive of survival after first relapse in 605 children who were enrolled onto three consecutive Intergroup Rhabdomyosarcoma Study Group protocols. RESULTS: The median survival time from first recurrence was 0.8 years; the estimated percentage of patients who survived 5 years from first recurrence was 17% +/- 2% (mean +/- SD). Univariate analysis showed that tumor histology was an important predictor of 5-year survival (P <.001): the 5-year survival rate was 64% for patients with botryoid tumors (n = 19), 26% for patients with embryonal tumors (n = 313), and 5% for patients with alveolar or undifferentiated sarcoma (n = 273). Further analysis identified prognostic factors within histologic subtypes (P <.001). For patients with embryonal tumors, the estimated 5-year survival rate was 52% for patients who initially presented with stage 1 or group I disease, 20% for those with stage 2/3 or group II/III disease, and 12% for those with group IV disease. For patients with stage 1/group I disease, estimated 5-year survival rates were higher for patients with local (72%) or regional (50%) recurrence than for those with distant (30%) recurrence. Among patients with alveolar or undifferentiated sarcoma, only the disease group predicted outcome: the 5-year survival estimate was 40% for group I versus 3% for groups II through IV. We identified a "favorable risk" group (approximately 20% of patients) whose 5-year estimated survival rate was near 50%; for all other patients, the estimated survival was near 10%. CONCLUSION: This analysis demonstrates that the probability of 5-year survival after relapse for rhabdomyosarcoma is dependent on several factors at the time of initial diagnosis, including histologic subtype, disease group, and stage. These findings will form the basis of a multi-institutional risk-adapted relapse protocol for childhood rhabdomyosarcoma.

Prognostic factors for children and adolescents with surgically resected nonrhabdomyosarcoma soft tissue sarcoma: an analysis of 121 patients treated at St Jude Children's Research Hospital.

PURPOSE: The rarity and heterogeneity of pediatric nonrhabdomyosarcoma soft tissue sarcoma (NRSTS) has precluded meaningful analysis of prognostic factors associated with surgically resected disease. To define a population of patients at high risk of treatment failure who might benefit from adjuvant therapies, we evaluated the relationship between various clinicopathologic factors and clinical outcome of children and adolescents with resected NRSTS over a 27-year period at our institution. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We analyzed the records of 121 consecutive patients with NRSTS who underwent surgical resection between August 1969 and December 1996. Demographic data, tumor characteristics, treatment, and outcomes were recorded. Univariate and multivariate analyses of prognostic factors for survival, event-free survival (EFS), and local and distant recurrence were performed. RESULTS: At a median follow-up of 9.2 years, 5-year survival and EFS rates for the entire cohort were 89% +/- 3% and 77% +/- 4%, respectively. In univariate models, positive surgical margins (P =.004), tumor size > or = 5 cm (P <.001), invasivene (P =.002), high grade (P =.028), and intra-abdominal primary tumor site (P =.055) adversely affected EFS. All of these factors except invasiveness remained prognostic of EFS and survival in multivariate models. Positive surgical margins (P =.003), intra-abdominal primary tumor site (P =.028), and the omission of radiation therapy (P =.043) predicted local recurrence, whereas tumor size > or = 5 cm (P <.001), invasiveness (P <.001), and high grade (P =.004) predicted distant recurrence. CONCLUSION: In this largest single-institution analysis of pediatric patients with surgically resected NRSTS, we identified clinicopathologic features predictive of poor outcome. These variables should be prospectively evaluated as risk-adapted therapies are developed.

Which patients with microscopic disease and rhabdomyosarcoma experience relapse after therapy? A report from the soft tissue sarcoma committee of the children's oncology group.

PURPOSE: To identify which patients with rhabdomyosarcoma and microscopic residual disease (group II) are likely to not respond to therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Six hundred ninety-five patients with group II tumors received chemotherapy and 90% received radiation therapy on Intergroup Rhabdomyosarcoma Study (IRS)-I to IRS-IV (1972 to 1997). Tumors were subgrouped depending on the presence of microscopic residual disease only (subgroup IIa), resected positive regional lymph nodes, (subgroup IIb), or microscopic residual disease and resected positive regional lymph nodes (subgroup IIc). RESULTS: Overall, the 5-year failure-free survival rate (FFSR) was 73%, and patients with embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma treated on IRS-IV fared especially well (5-year FFSR, 93%; n = 90). Five-year FFSRs differed significantly by subgroup (IIa, 75% and n = 506; IIb, 74% and n = 101; IIc, 58% and n = 88; P = .0037) and treatment (IRS-I, 68%; IRS-II, 67%; IRS-III, 75%; IRS-IV, 87%; P < .001). Multivariate analysis revealed positive associations between primary site (favorable), histology (embryonal), subgroup IIa or IIb, treatment (IRS-III/IV), and better FFSRs. Patterns of treatment failure revealed local failure to be 8%, regional failure, 4%, and distant failure, 14%. The relapse pattern noted over the course of IRS-I to IRS-IV shows a decrease in the systemic relapse rates, particularly for patients with embryonal histology, suggesting that improvement in FFSRs is primarily a result of improved chemotherapy. CONCLUSION: Group II rhabdomyosarcoma has an excellent prognosis with contemporary therapy as used in IRS-III/IV, and those less likely to respond can be identified using prognostic factors: histology, subgroup, and primary site. Patients with embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma are generally cured, although patients with alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma or undifferentiated sarcoma, particularly subgroup IIc at unfavorable sites, continue to need better therapy.

Direct translation of a protracted irinotecan schedule from a xenograft model to a phase I trial in children.

PURPOSE: In a preclinical model of neuroblastoma, administration of irinotecan daily 5 days per week for 2 consecutive weeks ([qd x 5] x 2) resulted in greater antitumor activity than did a single 5-day course with the same total dose. We evaluated this protracted schedule in children. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-three children with refractory solid tumors were enrolled onto a phase I study. Cohorts received irinotecan by 1-hour intravenous infusion at 20, 24, or 29 mg/m(2) (qd x 5) x 2 every 21 days. RESULTS: The 23 children (median age, 14.1 years; median prior regimens, two) received 84 courses. Predominant diagnoses were neuroblastoma (n = 5), osteosarcoma (n = 5), and rhabdomyosarcoma (n = 4). The dose-limiting toxicity was grade 3/4 diarrhea and/or abdominal cramps in six of 12 patients treated at 24 mg/m(2), despite aggressive use of loperamide. The maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) on this schedule was 20 mg/m(2)/d. Five patients had partial responses and 16 had disease stabilization. On day 1, the median systemic exposure to SN-38 (the active metabolite of irinotecan) at the MTD was 106 ng-h/mL (range, 41 to 421 ng-h/mL). CONCLUSION: This protracted schedule is well tolerated in children. The absence of significant myelosuppression and encouraging clinical responses suggest compellingly that irinotecan be further evaluated in children using the (qd x 5) x 2 schedule, beginning at a dose of 20 mg/m(2). These results imply that data obtained from xenograft models can be effectively integrated into the design of clinical trials.

Phase I targeted systemic exposure study of paclitaxel in children with refractory acute leukemias.

Clearance of anticancer drugs in children is highly variable, leading to wide variability in the systemic exposure associated with each dosage escalation in Phase I studies. The purpose of this Phase I study was to escalate targeted systemic exposure to paclitaxel, rather than dose, to attenuate the impact of pharmacokinetic variability at each escalation level. Children with recurrent acute leukemias received paclitaxel as 24-h infusions at escalating levels of paclitaxel systemic exposure [i.e., area under the concentration-versus-time curve (AUC)]. Plasma paclitaxel concentrations were measured by high-performance liquid chromatography-UV detection. A Bayesian algorithm using a two-compartment model with saturable distribution and saturable elimination was used to estimate clearance during the first 8 h of infusion; the infusion rate was adjusted 12 h after the start of infusion to achieve the target AUC. Toxicity and evidence of activity were assessed after each course. Six boys and one girl received eight courses of paclitaxel. The target AUC ranged from 31.5 to 45 microM x h. Five of the seven evaluable courses had AUCs between 75% and 125% of the target after adjustment (median, 100.2%; range, 51-151%), whereas none of the seven courses was projected to be in the target range had no change in dose been made (P = 0.021). The ratio of the achieved AUC to the target AUC was inversely related to clearance (r = -0.857; P = 0.014). Mucositis was the exposure-limiting toxicity, at AUCs lower than were expected based on Phase I studies in children with solid tumors. Pharmacokinetically-guided dosing strategies reduced variability in systemic exposure. Alternatives to traditional Phase I studies may be important in the setting of childhood leukemias because these patients show poor tolerance to Phase I therapy.

Melanoma in children and adolescents.

Childhood and adolescent melanoma is rare, accounting for only 1.3% for all cases of cancer in patients under the age of 20 years. However, in 15-19 year olds, melanoma accounts for up to 7% of all cancers. Review of reported cases in this age group reveals that predisposing 'paediatric' conditions such as a giant congenital melanocytic naevi or xeroderma pigmentosum are rarely present. Furthermore, inactivating germ-line mutations of the gene CDKN2A have only been reported in 1.5% of cases of early onset melanoma. Epidemiological studies suggest that interactions between solar exposure, development of naevi, pigmentary traits, and a family history of melanoma are the main determinants of melanoma development during the first 20 years of life. As yet, there are no available staging or treatment strategies for this group of patients so treatment recommendations are based on the adult experience. To improve our understanding of the natural history of melanoma and to identify the most appropriate therapies for young patients with this disease, practising physicians are encouraged to enroll their patients, especially those with advanced stage disease, in cooperative group trials which incorporate newer staging systems and promising therapies.