The Use of Community Health Workers in Community Health Centers.

BACKGROUND: Until 2016, community health centers (CHCs) reported community health workers (CHWs) as part of their overall enabling services workforce, making analyses of CHW use over time infeasible in the annual Uniform Data System (UDS). OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to examine changes in the CHW workforce among CHCs from 2016 to 2018 and factors associated with the use of CHWs. RESEARCH DESIGN, SUBJECTS, MEASURES: The two-part model estimated separate effects for the probability of using any CHW and extent of CHW full-time equivalents (FTEs) reported in those CHCs, using a total of 4102 CHC-year observations from 2016 to 2018. To estimate the extent to which increases in CHW workforce are attributable to real growth or rather are a consequence of a change in reporting category, we also conducted a difference-in-differences analysis to compare non-CHW enabling services FTEs between CHCs with and without CHWs before (2013-2015) and after (2016-2018) the reporting change in 2016. RESULTS: The rate of CHCs that employed CHWs rose from 20.04% in 2016 to 28.34% in 2018, while average FTEs stayed relatively flat (3.32 FTEs). Patient visit volume (larger CHCs) and grant funding (less reliant on federal but more reliant on private funding) were significant factors associated with CHW use. However, we found that a substantial portion of this growth was attributable to a change in UDS reporting categories. CONCLUSION: While we do not address the reasons why CHCs have been slow to use CHWs, our results point to substantial financial barriers associated with CHCs' expanding the use of CHWs.

Is Anemia in Low Income Pregnant Women Related to Their Infants' Having Anemia? A Cohort Study of Pregnant Women-Infant Pairs in the United States.

OBJECTIVE: Given evidence that anemia in the first year of life is associated with long-term cognitive, motor, and behavioral deficits, reducing infant anemia is important. The primary objective of this research is to examine whether anemia in low income pregnant women in the United States is associated with anemia in the women's infants. METHODS: This cohort study linked Centers for Disease Control and Prevention surveillance data on pregnant women with incomes below 185% of the federal poverty level from 2010 and 2011 with data on 6-11 month olds from 2011, resulting in a sample of 21,246 uniquely matched mother-infant pairs. We examined bivariate and multivariate relationship between anemia severity in pregnant women and in their infants. RESULTS: Seventeen percent of women had anemia (13.1% mild and 3.9% moderate to severe) and 20.1% infants had anemia (16.4% mild and 3.7% moderate to severe). For both women and infants, blacks had substantially higher anemia rates than whites. In bivariate analysis and multivariate analyses maternal anemia showed a dose-response relationship to infant anemia. In predicted probabilities from the multivariate models, 27.2% of infants born to pregnant women with moderate to severe anemia had anemia, compared to 23.3% for infants whose mothers had mild anemia, and 18.3% for infants whose mothers did not have anemia. CONCLUSION: This study provides strong evidence of a relationship between maternal and infant anemia in the United States among people with low incomes. Efforts to reduce anemia during pregnancy may be an important strategy for minimizing childhood anemia.

Do nurse practitioner-led medical homes differ from physician-led medical homes?

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: The patient-centered medical home (PCMH) is an enhanced model of primary care. This study examined to what extent nurse practitioner (NP)-led PCMHs differed from traditional physician-led PCMHs. METHODS: We tested for differences between 391 NP-led PCMHs and 11,479 physician-led PCMHs, as well as across two distinct clusters identified by the Two-Step cluster analysis procedure using a sample of 136 practices. FINDINGS: NP-led PCMHs were more likely to serve vulnerable populations in rural and underserved areas than physician-led PCMHs. NP-led PCMHs tended to be more responsive to population health needs in the areas during the recognition process, while physician-led PCMHs emphasized practice improvements through enhanced access to care and management of patient information data. DISCUSSION: The findings suggest possible differences in capabilities, priorities and needs of the population served across practices. This is an important guide as policymakers track the adoption of PCMHs.

Does the Patient-centered Medical Home Model Change Staffing and Utilization in the Community Health Centers?

BACKGROUND: Few studies have looked under the hood of practice redesign to understand whether and, if so, how staffing changed with the adoption of patient-centered medical home (PCMH), and whether these staffing changes impacted utilization. OBJECTIVES: To examine the workforce transformation occurring in community health centers that have achieved PCMH status, and to assess the relationship of those changes to utilization, as measured by the number of visits. RESEARCH DESIGN, SUBJECTS, MEASURES: Using a difference-in-differences approach, we compared staffing and utilization outcomes in 450 community health centers that had adopted a PCMH model between 2007 and 2013 to a matched sample of 243 nonadopters located in the 50 states and the District of Columbia. RESULTS: We found that adopting a PCMH model was significantly associated with a growth in use of advanced practice staff (nurse practitioners and physician assistants) [0.53 full-time equivalent (FTE), 8.77%; P<0.001], other medical staff (medical assistants, nurse aides, and quality assurance staff) (1.23 FTE, 7.46%; P=0.001), mental health/substance abuse staff (0.73 FTE, 17.63%; P=0.005), and enabling service staff (case managers and health educators) (0.36 FTE, 6.14%; P=0.079), but not primary care physicians or nurses. We did not observe a significant increase in utilization, as measured in total number of visits per year. However, the visits marginally attributed to advanced practice staff (539 FTE, 0.89%; P=0.037) and mental health/substance abuse staff (353 FTE, 0.59%; P=0.051) significantly increased. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that the implementation of PCMH actively reengineers staff composition and this, in turn, results in changes in marginal utilization by each staff type.

Associations of Nurse Staffing and Education With the Length of Stay of Surgical Patients.

PURPOSE: To examine the association of nurse staffing and education with the length of stay of surgical patients in acute care hospitals in South Korea. DESIGN: A cross-sectional survey design was used for a nurse survey in acute hospitals collected between 2008 and 2009. The survey data (N = 1,665) were linked with patient discharge data (N = 113,438) and hospital facility data from 58 hospitals with 100 or more beds in South Korea. METHODS: The dependent variable was the length of stay, that is, the number of days a patient remained in the hospital. The independent variables were nurse staffing (number of patients per nurse) and nurses' education level (percentage of nurses with a bachelor of science in nursing [BSN] degree). A multilevel analysis was used to analyze the associations of nurse staffing and education level with the length of stay by controlling for both hospital and patient characteristics. FINDINGS: The average proportion of nurses with a BSN in all the hospitals was 30.86%, while the average number of patients per nurse was 14.31. The median length of hospital stay for patients was about 7 days. The multilevel analysis showed that nurse staffing and nurse education level were significantly associated with the length of stay of surgical patients in acute care hospitals. A 10% increase in the average number of patients per nurse increased the length of stay by 0.284 days (p = .037). When the number of nurses with a BSN was increased by 1%, the length of stay decreased by 0.42 days (p = .025). CONCLUSIONS: Nurse staffing and nurses' education levels were significantly associated with the length of stay of surgical patients in South Korean hospitals. The findings from this study suggest that the South Korea healthcare system should develop appropriate strategies to improve the nurse staffing and education levels to ensure high-quality patient care in hospitals. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Healthcare policymakers and nurse managers need to modify adequate nurse staffing and education levels in order to reduce the length of stay of patients.

Malpractice Environment vs Direct Litigation: What Drives Nursing Home Exit?

An ongoing concern about medical malpractice litigation is that it may induce provider exit, potentially affecting consumer welfare. The nursing home sector is subject to substantial litigation activity but remains generally understudied in terms of the effects of litigation, due perhaps to a paucity of readily available data. In this article, we estimate the association between litigation and nursing home exit (closure or change in ownership), separating the impact of malpractice environment from direct litigation. We use 2 main data sources for this study: Westlaw's Adverse Filings database (1997-2005) and Online Survey, Certification and Reporting data sets (1997-2005). We use probit models with state and year fixed effects to examine the relationship between litigation and the probability of nursing home closure or change in ownership with and without adjustment for malpractice environment. We examine the relationship on average and also stratify by profit status, chain membership, and market competition. We find that direct litigation against a nursing home has a nonsignificant effect on the probability of closure or change in ownership within the subsequent 2 years. In contrast, the broader malpractice environment has a significant effect on change in ownership, even for nursing homes that have not been sued, but not on closure. Effects are stronger among for-profit and chain facilities and those in more competitive markets. A high-risk malpractice environment is associated with change of ownership of nursing homes regardless of whether they have been directly sued, indicating that it is too blunt an instrument for weeding out low-quality nursing homes.

Use of hospitalists and office-based primary care physicians' productivity.

BACKGROUND: Growth in the care of hospitalized patients by hospitalists has the potential to increase the productivity of office-based primary care physicians (PCPs) by allowing them to focus on outpatient practice. OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to examine the association between utilization of hospitalists and the productivity of office-based PCPs. DESIGN/PARTICIPANTS: The cross-sectional study was conducted using the 2008 Health Tracking Physician Survey Restricted Use File linked to the Area Resource File. We analyzed a total of 1,158 office-based PCPs representing a weighted total of 97,355 physicians. MAIN MEASURES: Utilization of hospitalists was defined as the percentage of a PCP's hospitalized patients treated by a hospitalist. The measures of PCPs' productivity were: (1) number of hospital visits per week, (2) number of office and outpatient clinic visits per week, and (3) direct patient care time per visit. KEY RESULTS: We found that the use of hospitalists was significantly associated with a decreased number of hospital visits. The use of hospitalists was also associated with an increased number of office visits, but this was only significant for high users. Physicians who used hospitalists for more than three-quarters of their hospitalized patients had an extra 8.8 office visits per week on average (p = 0.05), which was equivalent to a 10 % increase in productivity over the predicted mean of 87 visits for physicians who did not use hospitalists. We did not find any significant differences in direct patient care time per visit. CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrates that the increase in productivity for the one-third of PCPs who use hospitalists extensively may not be sufficient to offset the current loss of PCP workforce. However, our findings provide cautious optimism that if more PCPs effectively and efficiently used hospitalists, this could help mitigate a PCP shortage and improve access to primary care services.

Nurse practitioner and physician assistant staffing in the patient-centered medical homes in New York State.

BACKGROUND: A cornerstone of patient-centered medical homes (PCMHs) is team-based care; however, there is little information about the composition of staff who deliver direct primary care in PCMHs. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to examine the number and distribution of primary care physicians (PCPs), nurse practitioners (NPs), and physician assistants (PAs) in PCMH and non-PCMH practices located in New York State (N = 7,431). METHOD: Practice based ratios of primary care NPs and PAs to PCP were calculated and compared by PCMH designations. Designated PCMHs had more NPs and PAs per PCP relative to non-PCMHs. The ratios of NPs to PCPs were almost twice as high in PCMHs compared with non-PCMHs (0.20 and 0.11), and ratios were similarly different for PAs to PCPs (0.16 and 0.09, respectively). The multivariate analyses also support that higher NP and PA staffing was associated with PCMH designation (i.e., there was one additional NP and/or PA for every 25 PCPs). DISCUSSION: The growth of PCMHs may require more NPs and PAs to meet the anticipated growth in demand for health care. Policy- and practice-level changes are necessary to use them in the most effective ways.

Changes in the relationship between nursing home financial performance and quality of care under public reporting.

The relationship between financial performance and quality of care in nursing homes is not well defined and prior work has been mixed. The recent focus on improving the quality of nursing homes through market-based incentives such as public reporting may have changed this relationship, as public reporting provides nursing homes with increased incentives to engage in quality-based competition. If quality improvement activities require substantial production costs, nursing home profitability may become a more important predictor of quality under public reporting. This study explores the relationship between financial performance and quality of care and test whether this relationship changes under public reporting. Using a 10-year (fiscal years 1997-2006) panel data set of 9444 skilled nursing facilities in the US, this study employs a facility fixed-effects with and without instrumental variables approach to test the effect of finances on quality improvement and correct for potential endogeneity. The results show that better financial performance, as reflected by the 1-year lagged total profit margin, is modestly associated with higher quality but only after public reporting is initiated. These findings have important policy implications as federal and state governments use market-based incentives to increase demand for high-quality care and induce providers to compete based on quality.

Community Health Center Residency Training: Improving Staffing, Service, and Quality.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Community-based residency programs are an important strategy to address rural and underserved primary care shortages, however, health centers report both benefits and challenges to training. This study aims to understand the impact of new Teaching Health Center (THC) residency programs on health center staffing, patient service, quality of care, and provider productivity. METHODS: Using the Uniform Data System, we used inverse propensity score weighting to create a balanced sample of new THC and non-THC health centers in 2010. Using 2018 data, we applied propensity score weighted regressions to examine changes in staffing, service, quality of care, and productivity in THC versus non-THC health centers. RESULTS: In 2018, health centers with new THC programs were associated with increased physician (16.40, P<.01) staffing, yet decreased physician visits per full-time equivalent (-425.3, P<.01) relative to non-THC centers. New THC centers had increased delivery visits (231.0, P<.05), and had a greater rate of early entry into prenatal care (4.90%, P<.01). CONCLUSIONS: New residency programs are associated with increased provider recruitment, expanded patient service, and some improved health outcomes, but also with potential decreased provider productivity in health centers.

Effects of completing a postgraduate residency or fellowship program on primary care nurse practitioners' transition to practice.

BACKGROUND: To prepare new graduate nurse practitioners (NPs) for transition to practice, postgraduate residency or fellowship programs have been spreading across the nation in the past decade. PURPOSE: We examined the effects of completing a postgraduate residency or fellowship program on role perception, practice autonomy, team collaboration, job satisfaction, and intent to leave among primary care NPs (PCNPs). METHODS: We analyzed 8,400 PCNP respondents, representing a total of 75,963 PCNPs nationwide, to the 2018 National Sample Survey of Registered Nurses. We conducted multivariate logistic regression analyses to examine whether completing a postgraduate training program was associated with increased role perception, greater practice autonomy, improved team collaboration, increased job satisfaction, and decreased intent to leave in their work, controlling for NP personal and practice characteristics. RESULTS: About 10% of PCNPs completed some form of postgraduate training. Primary care NPs who had completed a residency or fellowship program were more likely to have a minority background (e.g., non-White and male) and also see more underserved populations (e.g., minority background, with limited English proficiency) than those without residency training. We found that PCNPs with residency training were more likely to report enhanced confidence in independent roles, greater practice autonomy, improved team collaboration, increased job satisfaction, and decreased intent to leave than those without residency training. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: This study supports further expansion of such programs, which would have positive effects for NPs, health care organizations, and patients, necessitating a long-overdue conversation about real public funding for primary care graduate nursing education.

Umbilical Cord Practices of Members of the American College of Nurse-Midwives.

INTRODUCTION: Mercer et al surveyed members of the American College of Nurse-Midwives (ACNM) about their umbilical cord clamping practices in 2000. Over the last 20 years, a significant body of research supporting delayed cord clamping (DCC) has been published. The purpose of this study was to learn how midwives today manage the umbilical cord at birth. METHODS: To better understand the current practices of midwives, in 2017, a national online survey of ACNM members was conducted. A total of 24 questions were asked about DCC, cord milking, specific clinical circumstances, and the presence of policies or guidelines. RESULTS: A total of 5306 surveys were sent with 1106 responses. After applying inclusion criteria, 1050 were available for analysis. Respondents practiced in all settings: home, birth centers, and hospitals. Compared with 2000, a 46% increase in the practice of DCC was identified. In this study, 98% of the participants reported facilitating DCC for full-term vaginal births as compared with 67% in 2000. In addition, 25% practiced DCC for near-term and 65% for preterm neonates. Cord milking was practiced by 37% of participants. When asked about barriers to practicing DCC, 54% of participants identified time pressures to hand off the newborn as the greatest detriment. It was challenging to practice DCC in situations wherein the newborn needed resuscitation or in breech births. Far fewer midwives practice cord milking compared with DCC. DISCUSSION: The survey results suggest there has been an increase in the practice of DCC over the last 20 years. Cord milking is not as widely practiced as DCC, and respondents were less likely to be convinced by the evidence for cord milking. This speaks to the opportunity for more education for midwives. There is also a need for clinical guidelines that address umbilical cord management when challenging circumstances arise such as breech birth, shoulder dystocia, and the need for resuscitation.

Does expanded state scope of practice for nurse practitioners and physician assistants increase primary care utilization in community health centers?

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Expanding state scope of practice (SOP) for nurse practitioners (NPs) and physician assistants (PAs) can boost productivity and improve access to health care services. Existing analyses on regulatory policies in NP or PA SOP have primarily focused on the direct effects on their own professions but have not fully considered the potential cross-professional effects. This study examines the impact of expanded state SOP for NPs and PAs on primary care utilization by NP, PA, and primary care physician (PCP) in community health centers (CHCs). METHODS: We conducted a difference-in-differences approach using the Uniform Data System for 739 CHCs from 2009 to 2015. During our study period, 12 states liberalized NP SOP laws and 14 states changed their PA SOP regulations. The number of visits per full-time equivalent clinician (NP, PA, and PCP) per year was the outcome of interest and was linked to the degree of state SOP restriction for NPs and PAs in a given year. CONCLUSIONS: Granting independent practice and prescriptive authority for NPs resulted in statistically significant increases in NP visits, and decreases in both PA and PCP visits, for those CHCs with a high proportion of NPs and PAs along with the increased provision of support staff. PA SOP liberalization had no statistically significant effect on PA visits. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: As the NP and PA workforce continues to grow, and as SOP laws continue to be liberalized, it is important to advance evidence on how to most efficiently deploy these staff.

The staffing-outcomes relationship in nursing homes.

OBJECTIVE: To assess longitudinally whether a change in registered nurse (RN) staffing and skill mix leads to a change in nursing home resident outcomes while controlling for the potential endogeneity of staffing. DATA SOURCES: Minimum Data Set (MDS) nursing home resident assessment data from five states merged with Online Survey Certification and Reporting (OSCAR) data from 1996 through 2000. STUDY DESIGN: Resident-level longitudinal analysis with facility fixed effects and instrumental variables. Outcomes studied are incidence of pressure sores and urinary tract infections. RN staffing was measured as the care hours per resident-day and skill mix was measured as RN staffing hours as a proportion of total staffing hours. DATA EXTRACTION METHOD: We use all quarterly MDS assessments that fall within 120 days of an annual OSCAR data point, resulting in 399,206 resident-level observations. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Controlling for endogeneity of staffing increases the estimated impact of staffing on outcomes in nursing homes. Greater RN staffing significantly decreases the likelihood of both adverse outcomes. Increasing skill mix only reduces the incidence of urinary tract infections. CONCLUSIONS: Research that fails to account for endogeneity of the staffing-outcomes relationship may underestimate the benefit from increased RN staffing. Increases in RN staffing are likely to reduce adverse outcomes in some nursing homes. More research using a broader array of instruments and a national sample would be beneficial.

Are State Telehealth Policies Associated With The Use Of Telehealth Services Among Underserved Populations?

Using four years of data from a nationally representative consumer survey, we examined trends in telehealth usage over time and the role state telehealth policies play in telehealth use. Telehealth use increased dramatically during the period 2013-16, with new modalities such as live video, live chat, texting, and mobile apps gaining traction. The rate of live video communication rose from 6.6 percent in June 2013 to 21.6 percent in December 2016. However, underserved populations-including Medicaid, low-income, and rural populations-did not use live video communication as widely as other groups did. Less restrictive state telehealth policies were not associated with increased usage overall or among underserved populations. This study suggests that state efforts alone to remove barriers to using telehealth might not be sufficient for increasing use, and new incentives for providers and consumers to adopt and use telehealth may be needed.

To What Extent Are State Scope of Practice Laws Related to Nurse Practitioners' Day-to-Day Practice Autonomy?

We explore the extent to which state scope of practice laws are related to nurse practitioners (NPs)' day-to-day practice autonomy. We found that NPs experienced greater day-to-day practice autonomy when they had prescriptive independence. Surprisingly, there were only small and largely insignificant differences in day-to-day practice autonomy between NPs in fully restricted states and those in states with independent practice but restricted prescription authority. The scope of practice effects were strong for primary care NPs. We also found that the amount of variation in day-to-day practice autonomy within the scope of practice categories existed, which suggests that factors other than state scope of practice laws may influence NP practice as well. Removing barriers at all levels that potentially prevent NPs from practicing to the full extent of their education and training is critical not only to increase primary care capacity but also to make NPs more efficient and effective providers.

Determinants and effects of nurse staffing intensity and skill mix in residential care/assisted living settings.

PURPOSE: Residential care/assisted living facilities have become an alternative to nursing homes for many individuals, yet little information exists about staffing in these settings and the effect of staffing. This study analyzed the intensity and skill mix of nursing staff using data from a four-state study, and their relationship to outcomes. DESIGN AND METHODS: We obtained longitudinal data for 1,894 residents of 170 residential care/assisted living facilities participating in the Collaborative Studies of Long-Term Care. Descriptive statistics assessed the levels of direct care staff (registered nurse, licensed practical nurse, personal care aide). Regression analyses evaluated the relationship between two staffing measures (intensity measured as care hours per resident and skill mix measured as the percentage of total care hours by licensed nurses), facility characteristics, and four health outcomes (mortality, nursing home transfer, hospitalization, and incident morbidity). RESULTS: Care hours per resident decreased with facility size (economies of scale) only for very small facilities and increased with dementia prevalence (case-mix effect). Licensed staff accounted for a greater proportion of total hours in nonprofit settings. Health outcomes did not vary by total care hours per resident, but hospitalization rates were significantly lower in facilities with higher proportions of skilled staff hours; this effect was stronger as dementia case mix increased. IMPLICATIONS: Current staffing levels for the outcomes analyzed meet most residents' needs. Reduced hospitalization in relation to greater use of licensed staff suggests that increased use of these workers might result in reductions in acute care expenditures.

The Association of Electronic Health Record Adoption with Staffing Mix in Community Health Centers.

OBJECTIVE: To assess how medical staffing mix changed over time in association with the adoption of electronic health records (EHRs) in community health centers (CHCs). STUDY SETTING: Community health centers within the 50 states and Washington, DC. STUDY DESIGN: Estimated how the change in the share of total medical staff full-time equivalents (FTE) by provider category between 2007 and 2013 was associated with EHR adoption using fractional multinomial logit. DATA COLLECTION: 2007-2013 Uniform Data System, an administrative data set of Section 330 federal grant recipients; and Readiness for Meaningful Use and HIT and Patient Centered Medical Home Recognition Survey responses collected from Section 330 recipients between December 2010 and February 2011. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Having an EHR system did significantly shift the share of workers over time between physicians and each of the other categories of health care workers. While an EHR system significantly shifted the share of physician and other medical staff, this effect did not significantly vary over time. CHCs with EHRs by the end of the study period had a relatively greater proportion of other medical staff compared to the proportion of physicians. CONCLUSIONS: Electronic health records appeared to influence staffing allocation in CHCs such that other medical staff may be used to support adoption of EHRs as well as be leveraged as an important care provider.

Gender differences in nurse practitioner salaries.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: While male nurses have been shown to earn considerably more than female nurses, there is less evidence on gender disparities in salary among nurse practitioners (NPs). This study examines whether the gender gap in NP salaries persists after controlling for differences in work setting and demographic factors. METHODS: We analyzed the relationship between gender and salary (2011 pretax earnings) among 6591 NPs working as NPs at least 35 h per week, using the 2012 National Sample Survey of Nurse Practitioners. We first conducted bivariate regression analyses examining the relationship between gender and earnings, and then developed a multivariate model that controlled for individual differences in demographic and work characteristics. CONCLUSIONS: Male NPs earned $12,859 more than female NPs, after adjusting for individual differences in demographics and work characteristics. The gender gap was $7405 for recent NP graduates, and grew over time. Male NPs earned significantly more than female NPs across all clinical specialty areas. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: The gender disparities in NP salaries documented here regardless of professional seniority or clinical area should spark healthcare organizations to conduct pay equity assessments of their employees' salaries to identify and ameliorate pay inequality.

How important are autonomy and work setting to nurse practitioners' job satisfaction?

PURPOSE: Nurse practitioners (NPs) have reported aspects of their jobs that they are more and less satisfied with. However, few studies have examined the factors that predict overall job satisfaction. This study uses a large national sample to examine the extent to which autonomy and work setting predict job satisfaction. DATA SOURCES: The 2012 National Sample Survey of Nurse Practitioners (n = 8311) was used to examine bivariate and multivariate relationships between work setting and three autonomy variables (independent billing practices, having one's NP skills fully utilized, and relationship with physician), and job satisfaction. CONCLUSIONS: NPs working in primary care reported the highest levels of autonomy across all three autonomy measures, while those working in hospital surgical settings reported the lowest levels. Autonomy, specifically feeling one's NP skills were fully utilized, was the factor most predictive of satisfaction. In multivariate analyses, those who strongly agreed their skills were being fully utilized had satisfaction scores almost one point higher than those who strongly disagreed. Work setting was only marginally related to job satisfaction. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: In order to attract and retain NPs in the future, healthcare organizations should ensure that NPs' skills are being fully utilized.