RESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: To determine the association of adequate empirical combination therapy (AECT) with 30-day all-cause mortality in patients with septic shock due to Pseudomonas aeruginosa bloodstream infections (BSI). METHODS: This multicentre, retrospective cohort study analysed data from 14 public hospitals in Italy, including all consecutive adult patients admitted during 2021-2022 with septic shock due to P. aeruginosa BSI. We compared the outcomes of patients receiving AECT to those on adequate empirical monotherapy (AEMT) using Cox regression analyses. RESULTS: Of the 98 patients who received adequate empirical antibiotic treatment for septic shock due to P. aeruginosa BSI, 24 underwent AECT and 74 were given AEMT. AECT was associated with a lower 30-day all-cause mortality (25%, six out of 24) compared to AEMT (56.8%, 42 out of 74; Pâ=â0.007). Multivariate Cox regression analysis indicated AECT as the only factor significantly associated with improved survival (aHR 0.30; 95% CI 0.12-0.71; Pâ=â0.006). By contrast, the use of monotherapy or combination therapy in the definitive regimen did not influence mortality (aHR 0.73; 95% CI 0.25-2.14; Pâ=â0.568). CONCLUSIONS: AECT may be associated with reduced mortality compared to monotherapy in septic shock patients due to P. aeruginosa BSI. However, the administration of definitive adequate monotherapy or combination therapy yields similar outcomes, suggesting that once susceptibility is documented, switching to a single active in vitro drug is safe and feasible. Further studies are recommended to validate these findings.
RESUMEN
Perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis (PAP) in lung transplant recipients (LuTRs) has high heterogeneity between centers. Our aim was to investigate retrospectively the approach to PAP in our center over a 20-year period (2002-2023), and its impact on early post-operative infections (EPOIs) after lung transplantation (LuT). Primary endpoint was diagnosis of EPOI, defined as any bacterial infection including donor-derived events diagnosed within 30 days from LuT. Main exposure variables were type of PAP (combination vs. monotherapy) and PAP duration. We enrolled 111 LuTRs. PAP consisted of single-agent or combination regimens in 26 (25.2%) and 85 (74.8%) LuTR. Median PAP duration was 10 days (IQR 6-13) days. Piperacillin/tazobactam was the most common agent used either as monotherapy (n = 21, 80.7%) or as combination with levofloxacin (n = 79, 92.9%). EPOIs were diagnosed in 30 (27%) patients. At multivariable analysis no advantages were found for combination regimens compared to single-agent PAP in preventing EPOI (OR: 1.57, 95% CI: 0.488-5.068, p:0.448). The impact of PAP duration on EPOIs development was investigated including duration of PAP ≤6 days as main exposure variables, without finding a significantly impact (OR:2.165, 95% CI: 0.596-7.863, p: 0.240). Our results suggest no advantages for combination regimens PAP in preventing EPOI in LuTR.
Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos , Profilaxis Antibiótica , Trasplante de Pulmón , Humanos , Trasplante de Pulmón/efectos adversos , Profilaxis Antibiótica/métodos , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Antibacterianos/administración & dosificación , Adulto , Levofloxacino/uso terapéutico , Levofloxacino/administración & dosificación , Anciano , Combinación Piperacilina y Tazobactam/uso terapéutico , Combinación Piperacilina y Tazobactam/administración & dosificación , Infecciones Bacterianas/prevención & control , Infecciones Bacterianas/etiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/prevención & control , Quimioterapia CombinadaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccination in solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients is associated with poorer antibody response (AbR) compared with non-SOT recipients. However, its impact on the risk of breakthrough infection (BI) has yet to be assessed. METHODS: Single-center prospective longitudinal cohort study enrolling adult SOT recipients who received SARS-CoV-2 vaccination during a 1-year period (February 2021 - January 2022), end of follow-up April 2022. Patients were tested for AbR at multiple time points. The primary end-point was BI (laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection ≥14 days after the second dose). Immunization (positive AbR) was considered an intermediate state between vaccination and BI. Probabilities of being in vaccination, immunization, and BI states were obtained for each type of graft and vaccination sequence using multistate survival analysis. Then, multivariable logistic regression was performed to analyze the risk of BI related to AbR levels. RESULTS: 614 SOT (275 kidney, 163 liver, 137 heart, 39 lung) recipients were included. Most patients (84.7%) received 3 vaccine doses. The first 2 consisted of BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273 in 73.5% and 26.5% of cases, respectively. For the third dose, mRNA-1273 was administered in 59.8% of patients. Overall, 75.4% of patients reached immunization and 18.4% developed BI. Heart transplant recipients showed the lowest probability of immunization (0.418) and the highest of BI (0.323); all mRNA-1273 vaccine sequences showed the highest probability of immunization (0.732) and the lowest of BI (0.098). Risk of BI was higher for non-high-level AbR, younger age, and shorter time from transplant. CONCLUSIONS: SOT patients with non-high-level AbR and shorter time from transplantation and heart recipients are at highest risk of BI.
Asunto(s)
Vacunas contra la COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Trasplante de Órganos , Adulto , Humanos , Vacuna nCoV-2019 mRNA-1273 , Vacuna BNT162 , Infección Irruptiva , COVID-19/prevención & control , Vacunas contra la COVID-19/efectos adversos , Inmunidad , Estudios Longitudinales , Trasplante de Órganos/efectos adversos , Estudios Prospectivos , SARS-CoV-2 , VacunasRESUMEN
PURPOSE: To investigate the clinical impact of three available antivirals for early COVID-19 treatment in a large real-life cohort. METHODS: Between January and October 2022 all outpatients tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 referring to IRCCS S. Orsola hospital treated with an early antiviral therapy were enrolled. A comparison between patients treated with nirmatrelvir/ritonavir (NTV/r), molnupiravir (MPV) and remdesivir (RDV) was conducted in term of indications and outcome. To account for differences between treatment groups a propensity score analysis was performed. After estimating the weights, we fitted a survey-weighted Cox regression model with inverse-probability weighting with hospital admission/death versus clinical recovery as the primary outcome. RESULTS: Overall 1342 patients were enrolled, 775 (57.8%), 360 (26.8%) and 207 (15.4%) in MPV, NTV/r and RDV group, respectively. Median age was 73 (59-82) years, male sex was 53.4%. Primary indication was immunosuppression (438, 32.6%), the median time from symptom onset to drug administration was 3 [2-4] days. Overall, clinical recovery was reached in 96.9% of patients, with hospital admission rate of 2.6%. No significant differences were found in clinical recovery nor hospitalization. Cox regression showed a decreased probability of hospital admission/ death among prior vaccinated patients compared with unvaccinated (HR 0.31 [95%CI 0.14-0.70], p = 0.005]). No difference in hospitalization rates in early treatment compared to late treatment were found. CONCLUSIONS: No differences among MPV, NTV/r and RDV in terms of clinical recovery or hospitalization were found. Patients not vaccinated had a significant increased risk of hospitalization.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Pacientes Ambulatorios , Humanos , Masculino , Anciano , Tratamiento Farmacológico de COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Antivirales/uso terapéutico , Ritonavir/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The aim of this narrative review is to examine available evidence about the diagnostic yielding of the follow-up blood cultures (FU-BCs) in patients with Gram-negative bloodstream infection (GN-BSI), the predictors of persistent GN-BSI, and the impact of the performance of FU-BCs on patient management and clinical outcome. RECENT FINDINGS: The rate of persistent GN-BSI varies from 2.6% to 38.5%, with higher percentages in studies where FU-BCs were obtained from selected patients. Risk factors for persistent GN-BSI were analysed and prediction tools were proposed to guide physicians in the selection of patients. The impact of FU-BCs on patient management is still controversial as several authors have shown that this practice was associated with prolonged treatment duration and longer hospital stay. However, when adjusted for indication and survival bias, the performance of FU-BCs was a strong predictor of survival in large cohorts of hospitalized patients with GN-BSI. Favourable outcome seemed to be associated with higher rate of source control in GN-BSI patients managed with FU-BCs. SUMMARY: The practice of FU-BCs in patients with GN-BSI should be individualised balancing cost/benefit ratio. The use of risk scores could be useful in selecting patients for whom FU-BCs are appropriate.
Asunto(s)
Bacteriemia , Infecciones por Bacterias Gramnegativas , Sepsis , Humanos , Cultivo de Sangre , Infecciones por Bacterias Gramnegativas/diagnóstico , Infecciones por Bacterias Gramnegativas/tratamiento farmacológico , Estudios de Seguimiento , Bacteriemia/diagnóstico , Bacteriemia/tratamiento farmacológico , Bacterias Gramnegativas , Bacterias Grampositivas , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
Diagnosis and management of infectious diseases (ID) at the emergency department (ED) are challenging due to the peculiar setting and the available diagnostic tools. The involvement of an ID consultant has been described to improve clinical outcomes and antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) programs. An online survey was sent to 100 Italian Departments of Infectious Diseases affiliated with the Italian Society of Infectious Diseases and Tropical Medicine (SIMIT). The primary objective of our study was to describe the characteristics of ID services in Italian EDs to identify possible challenges and shortcomings and provide tips to improve the management of patients. Secondary objectives included the evaluation of diagnostic capability and the management of patients with suspected or confirmed ID. Seventy-six out of the 100 SIMIT centers, 32 (42.1%) of which were teaching hospitals, answered the survey. In 62 (82.7%) centers, consultations were performed by the IDs specialist on call. In 29 (38.2%) centers, there was a formal AMS program, and 32 (42.7%) had protocols for antibiotic use in the ED. Microbiological tests to be performed before starting antibiotic treatment in the ED were clearly defined in 44 (57.9%) hospitals. This survey highlighted several challenges in the current organization of ID consultations in Italian EDs.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Transmisibles , Humanos , Enfermedades Transmisibles/diagnóstico , Enfermedades Transmisibles/tratamiento farmacológico , Enfermedades Transmisibles/epidemiología , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Derivación y Consulta , Italia/epidemiología , Hospitales de EnseñanzaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: We evaluated the incidence of invasive pulmonary aspergillosis among intubated patients with critical COVID-19 and evaluated different case definitions of invasive aspergillosis. METHODS: Prospective, multicenter study in adult patients with microbiologically confirmed COVID-19 receiving mechanical ventilation. All included participants underwent a screening protocol for invasive pulmonary aspergillosis with bronchoalveolar lavage galactomannan and cultures performed on admission at 7 days and in case of clinical deterioration. Cases were classified as coronavirus-associated pulmonary aspergillosis (CAPA) according to previous consensus definitions. The new definition was compared with putative invasive pulmonary aspergillosis (PIPA). RESULTS: 108 patients were enrolled. Probable CAPA was diagnosed in 30 (27.7%) patients after a median of 4 (2-8) days from intensive care unit (ICU) admission. Kaplan-Meier curves showed a significantly higher 30-day mortality rate from ICU admission among patients with either CAPA (44% vs 19%, P = .002) or PIPA (74% vs 26%, P < .001) when compared with patients not fulfilling criteria for aspergillosis. The association between CAPA (OR, 3.53; 95% CI, 1.29-9.67; P = .014) or PIPA (OR, 11.60; 95% CI, 3.24-41.29; P < .001) with 30-day mortality from ICU admission was confirmed, even after adjustment for confounders with a logistic regression model. Among patients with CAPA receiving voriconazole treatment (13 patients; 43%) a trend toward lower mortality (46% vs 59%; P = .30) and reduction in galactomannan index in consecutive samples were observed. CONCLUSIONS: We found a high incidence of CAPA among critically ill COVID-19 patients and its occurrence seems to change the natural course of disease.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Aspergilosis Pulmonar Invasiva , Aspergilosis Pulmonar , Adulto , Humanos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Aspergilosis Pulmonar Invasiva/diagnóstico , Aspergilosis Pulmonar Invasiva/epidemiología , Estudios Prospectivos , SARS-CoV-2RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The management of non-fermentative gram-negative bloodstream infection (NFGN-BSI) offers numerous challenges. In this study the aim is to analyse a large cohort of patients with NFGN-BSI recruited in the northern Italy to describe epidemiology, etiological and susceptibility pattern, therapeutic management and outcome. METHODS: Multicentre retrospective cohort study of patients hospitalised at three large teaching hospitals in northern Italy in a fourth year period. RESULTS: 355 BSI episodes were analyzed, due to P. aeruginosa (72.7%), A. baumannii (16.6%), and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia (10.7%). Overall, 21.4% of isolates were defined as DTR, highest rate among A. baumannii (64.4%). All-cause 30-day mortality rate was 17.5%. Rates of XDR or DTR A. baumannii isolation were significantly higher in non-surviving patients. Independent risk factors for 30-day mortality were: age (HR 1.03, 95%CI 1.00-1.04, p = 0.003), septic shock (HR 2.84, 95%CI 1.67-4.82, p < 0.001) and BSI due to Acinetobacter baumannii (HR 2.23, 95%CI 1.27-3.94, p = 0.005). CONCLUSION: The overall prevalence of DTR was high in the NFGN BSI cohort analyzied, mainly among Acinetobacter baumannii episodes (64.4%). Acinetobacter baumannii is showed to be an independent predictor of mortality. These evidences marked the urgent need of new therapeutic options against this pathogen. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: 79/2017/O/OssN. Approved: March14th, 2017.
Asunto(s)
Acinetobacter baumannii , Bacteriemia , Stenotrophomonas maltophilia , Antibacterianos/farmacología , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Bacteriemia/tratamiento farmacológico , Bacteriemia/epidemiología , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana , Humanos , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) may be associated with worse outcome in solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients. We performed a prospective cohort study of hospitalized patients with confirmed diagnosis of COVID-19, from March 15 to April 30, 2020, at two tertiary hospitals in Emilia-Romagna Region. SOT recipients were compared with non-SOT patients. Primary endpoint was all-cause 30-day mortality. Relationship between SOT status and mortality was investigated by univariable and multivariable Cox regression analysis. Patients were assessed from COVID-19 diagnosis to death or 30-day whichever occurred first. Study cohort consisted of 885 patients, of them 24 SOT recipients (n = 22, kidney, n = 2 liver). SOT recipients were younger, had lower BMI, but higher Charlson Index. At admission they presented less frequently with fever and respiratory failure. No difference in 30-day mortality between the two groups (19% vs 22.1%) was found; however, there was a trend toward higher rate of respiratory failure (50% vs 33.1%, P = .07) in SOT recipients. Superinfections were more represented in SOT recipients, (50% vs 15.5%, P < .001). At multivariate analysis adjusted for main covariates, there was no association between SOT and 30-day mortality HR 1.15 (95% CI 0.39-3.35) P = .79. Our data suggest that mortality among COVID-19 SOT recipients is similar to general population.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19/complicaciones , COVID-19/mortalidad , Trasplante de Órganos , Factores de Riesgo , Receptores de Trasplantes , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis Multivariante , SARS-CoV-2RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the rate of and the risk factors for breakthrough-IFI (b-IFI) after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) according to the new definition proposed by Mycoses-Study-Group-Education-and-Research-Consortium (MSG-ERC) and the European-Confederation-of-Medical-Mycology (ECMM). METHODS: Multicenter prospective study of adult patients who underwent OLT at three Italian hospitals, from January 2015 to December 2018. Targeted antifungal prophylaxis (TAP) protocol was developed and shared among participating centers. Follow-up was 1-year after OLT. B-IFI was defined as infection occurring during exposure to antifungal prophylaxis. Risk factors for b-IFI were analyzed among patients exposed to prophylaxis by univariable analysis. RESULTS: We enrolled 485 OLT patients. Overall compliance to TAP protocol was 64.3%, 220 patients received antifungal prophylaxis, 172 according to TAP protocol. Twenty-nine patients were diagnosed of IFI within 1 year after OLT. Of them, 11 presented with b-IFI within 17 (IQR 11-33) and 16 (IQR 4-30) days from OLT and from antifungal onset, respectively. Then out of 11 patients with b-IFI were classified as having high risk of IFI and were receiving anti-mould prophylaxis, nine with echinocandins and one with polyenes. Comparison of patients with and without b-IFI showed significant differences for prior Candida colonization, need of renal replacement therapy after OLT, re-operation, and CMV infection (whole blood CMV-DNA >100 000 copies/mL). Although non-significant, a higher rate of b-IFI in patients on echinocandins was observed (8.2% vs 1.8%, P = .06). CONCLUSIONS: We observed 5% of b-IFI among OLT patients exposed to antifungal prophylaxis. The impact of echinocandins on b-IFI risk in this setting should be further explored.
Asunto(s)
Infecciones Fúngicas Invasoras , Trasplante de Hígado , Micosis , Adulto , Antifúngicos/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Infecciones Fúngicas Invasoras/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones Fúngicas Invasoras/epidemiología , Infecciones Fúngicas Invasoras/prevención & control , Trasplante de Hígado/efectos adversos , Micosis/tratamiento farmacológico , Micosis/epidemiología , Micosis/prevención & control , Estudios ProspectivosAsunto(s)
Proteínas Bacterianas , Portador Sano , Infecciones por Enterobacteriaceae , Enterobacteriaceae , beta-Lactamasas , Humanos , Infecciones por Enterobacteriaceae/microbiología , Infecciones por Enterobacteriaceae/mortalidad , beta-Lactamasas/genética , Proteínas Bacterianas/genética , Enterobacteriaceae/enzimología , Enterobacteriaceae/efectos de los fármacos , Enterobacteriaceae/genética , Portador Sano/microbiología , Bacteriemia/microbiología , Bacteriemia/mortalidad , Antibacterianos/farmacología , Antibacterianos/uso terapéuticoAsunto(s)
Infecciones por Citomegalovirus , Citomegalovirus , ARN Viral , Receptores de Trasplantes , Replicación Viral , Humanos , Infecciones por Citomegalovirus/virología , Infecciones por Citomegalovirus/diagnóstico , Citomegalovirus/genética , ARN Viral/genética , ARN Viral/sangre , Biomarcadores/sangre , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Viremia/virología , Femenino , AdultoRESUMEN
Objectives: We estimated the diagnostic accuracy of T2Candida, with blood culture (BC) as the gold standard, and compared turnaround time between these two techniques in order to investigate the potential role of T2Candida in the management of empirical antifungal treatment (EAT). Methods: We performed a single-centre prospective observational study in patients with severe sepsis or septic shock and multiple risk factors for candidaemia. Results: We analysed 46 out of 50 screened patients. All patients received an echinocandin as EAT; the median EAT duration was 7 days (IQR 4-13 days). BCs were negative in 31 (67.4%) patients, positive for bacteria in 14 (30.4%) patients and positive for Candida albicans in 1 (2.2%) patient. T2Candida was negative, invalid and positive in 37, 5 and 4 patients, respectively. T2Candida and BC results were concordant in all but three patients, where T2Candida was positive and BCs were negative. Two of them were on antifungal prophylaxis at the time of enrolment. T2Candida reduced time to a negative result by 5 days. T2Candida performance was: sensitivity = 100% (95% CI 2.5%-100%), specificity = 91.8% (95% CI 78%-98%), positive predictive value = 25% (95% CI 0.63%-80.6%) and negative predictive value = 100% (95% CI 89.7%-100%). Conclusions: In patients with multiple risk factors for candidaemia and severe sepsis or septic shock, T2Candida may be helpful to reduce the length of EAT.
Asunto(s)
Antifúngicos/uso terapéutico , Candidemia/diagnóstico , Candidemia/tratamiento farmacológico , Pruebas Diagnósticas de Rutina/métodos , Manejo de la Enfermedad , Técnicas Microbiológicas/métodos , Técnicas de Diagnóstico Molecular/métodos , Humanos , Espectroscopía de Resonancia Magnética , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Estudios Prospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Sensibilidad y EspecificidadRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Data about the optimal management of immunosuppressive therapy in liver transplant (LT) recipients with bloodstream infection (BSI) are missing. We aimed to describe the management of immunosuppressive therapy at diagnosis of BSI in LT recipients and to assess its impact on 28-day mortality. METHODS: We performed a single-center retrospective study of all LT recipients diagnosed with BSI, over 10-year period. Multivariate Cox regression analysis of risk factors for all cause 28-day mortality was adjusted for the propensity score of being managed with "any reduction" in immunosuppressive therapy at the diagnosis of BSI. RESULTS: We identified 209 episodes of BSI in 157 LT recipients: 107 (68%) male, median age 54 (IQR 48-63) years. "Any reduction" was made in 90 (43%) cases including: dosage reduction of ≥1 immunosuppressive drug in 31 (15%), discontinuation of ≥1 immunosuppressive drug in 28 (13%), both dosage reduction and discontinuation in 13 (6%), complete withdrawal of immunosuppressive therapy in 18 (9%) cases. All-cause 28-day mortality rate was 13.4%, varying from 22% to 7% (P = .002) in cases with and without "any reduction". Cox regression showed septic shock (aHR 3.15, P = .007) and "any reduction" (aHR 2.50, P = .02) as independent risk factors for all-cause 28-day mortality, while Escherichia coli (aHR 0.38, P = .03) and source control (aHR 0.43, P = .04) were protective factors. The final model did not change after the introduction of the propensity score for "any reduction". CONCLUSIONS: Any reduction in the immunosuppressive therapy was common and was associated with worse outcome in LT recipients developing BSI.
Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Terapia de Inmunosupresión/efectos adversos , Inmunosupresores/efectos adversos , Trasplante de Hígado/efectos adversos , Sepsis/mortalidad , Profilaxis Antibiótica/métodos , Femenino , Rechazo de Injerto/epidemiología , Rechazo de Injerto/inmunología , Rechazo de Injerto/prevención & control , Humanos , Terapia de Inmunosupresión/métodos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Sepsis/tratamiento farmacológico , Sepsis/inmunología , Sepsis/microbiología , Tasa de Supervivencia , Resultado del TratamientoAsunto(s)
Betacoronavirus , Infecciones por Coronavirus/terapia , Transmisión de Enfermedad Infecciosa/prevención & control , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/cirugía , Trasplante de Corazón , Neumonía Viral/terapia , Cuidados Preoperatorios/métodos , Receptores de Trasplantes , COVID-19 , Infecciones por Coronavirus/embriología , Infecciones por Coronavirus/transmisión , Humanos , Pandemias , Neumonía Viral/embriología , Neumonía Viral/transmisión , SARS-CoV-2RESUMEN
(1) Objectives: To assess the impact of optimal joint pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) target attainment of continuous infusion (CI) piperacillin-tazobactam monotherapy on the microbiological outcome of documented ESBL-producing Enterobacterlaes secondary bloodstream infections (BSIs). (2) Methods: Patients hospitalized in the period January 2022-October 2023, having a documented secondary BSI caused by ESBL-producing Enterobacterales, and being eligible for definitive targeted CI piperacillin-tazobactam monotherapy according to specific pre-defined inclusion criteria (i.e., absence of septic shock at onset; favorable clinical evolution in the first 48 h after starting treatment; low-intermediate risk primary infection source) were prospectively enrolled. A real-time therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM)-guided expert clinical pharmacological advice (ECPA) program was adopted for optimizing (PK/PD) target attainment of CI piperacillin-tazobactam monotherapy. Steady-state plasma concentrations (Css) of both piperacillin and tazobactam were measured, and the free fractions (f) were calculated based on theoretical protein binding. The joint PK/PD target attainment was considered optimal whenever the piperacillin fCss/MIC ratio was >4 and the tazobactam fCss/target concentration (CT) ratio was >1 (quasi-optimal or suboptimal if only one or neither of the two thresholds were achieved, respectively). Univariate analysis was carried out for assessing variables potentially associated with failure in achieving the optimal joint PK/PD target of piperacillin-tazobactam and microbiological eradication. (3) Results: Overall, 35 patients (median age 79 years; male 51.4%) were prospectively included. Secondary BSIs resulted from urinary tract infections as a primary source in 77.2% of cases. The joint PK/PD target attainment was optimal in as many as 97.1% of patients (34/35). Microbiological eradication occurred in 91.4% of cases (32/35). Attaining the quasi-optimal/suboptimal joint PK/PD target of CI piperacillin-tazobactam showed a trend toward a higher risk of microbiological failure (33.3% vs. 0.0%; p = 0.08) (4) Conclusions: Real-time TDM-guided optimal joint PK/PD target attainment of CI piperacillin-tazobactam monotherapy may represent a valuable and effective carbapenem-sparing strategy when dealing with non-severe ESBL-producing Enterobacterales secondary BSIs.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The benefits of mitral repair versus replacement for endocarditis are inconclusive. This study compares outcomes of patients with infective endocarditis undergoing mitral valve repair versus replacement and investigates the impact of microbial etiology. METHODS: All 251 patients undergoing mitral valve surgery for active endocarditis between 2010 and 2023 were enrolled, 180 (71.7%) replacement and 71 (28.3%) repair. To adjust for imbalances, inverse probability of treatment weighting was applied and 187 patients were obtained. RESULTS: The analysis between groups, following the application of inverse probability of treatment weighting, showed no statistically significant differences across all considered outcomes. Early and late death was observed respectively in 6 (8.5%) and 11 (15.5%) patients in the repair group versus 24 (13.3%) and 45 (25.0%) in the replacement group without statistical significance (p = 0.221 and p = 0.446). Relapse occurred in six patients (8.5%) in the repair group after a median time of 4.0 months and in six (3.3%) in the replacement after 6.9 months (p = 0.071). CONCLUSIONS: Surgical strategy in mitral endocarditis has no effect on major postoperative complications, mortality, or medium/long-term survival. Staphylococcus aureus and Coagulase-negative Staphylococci represent a risk for early mortality and relapse. However, mitral valve repair for endocarditis can be pursued when it ensures the complete eradication of all infected tissue, particularly in cases caused by Streptococcus infection, in young patients, and after a minimum of 18 days of antibiotic therapy.
RESUMEN
Background & Aims: The aim of this study was to investigate gut microbiome (GM) dynamics in relation to carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) colonization, CRE infection, and non-CRE infection development within 2 months after liver transplant (LT). Methods: A single-center, prospective study was performed in patients undergoing LT from November 2018 to January 2020. The GM was profiled through 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing of a rectal swab taken on the day of transplantation, and fecal samples were collected weekly until 1 month after LT. A subset of samples was subjected to shotgun metagenomics, including resistome dynamics. The primary endpoint was to explore changes in the GM in the following groups: (1) CRE carriers developing CRE infection (CRE_I); (2) CRE carriers not developing infection (CRE_UI); (3) non-CRE carriers developing microbial infection (INF); and (4) non-CRE carriers not developing infection (NEG). Results: Overall, 97 patients were enrolled, and 91 provided fecal samples. Of these, five, nine, 22, and 55 patients were classified as CRE_I, CRE_UI, INF, and NEG, respectively. CRE_I patients showed an immediate and sustained post-LT decrease in alpha diversity, with depletion of the GM structure and gradual over-representation of Klebsiella and Enterococcus. The proportions of Klebsiella were significantly higher in CRE_I patients than in NEG patients even before LT, serving as an early marker of subsequent CRE infection. CRE_UI patients had a more stable and diverse GM, whose compositional dynamics tended to overlap with those of NEG patients. Conclusions: GM profiling before LT could improve patient stratification and risk prediction and guide early GM-based intervention strategies to reduce infectious complications and improve overall prognosis. Impact and implications: Little is known about the temporal dynamics of gut microbiome (GM) in liver transplant recipients associated with carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) colonization and infection. The GM structure and functionality of patients colonized with CRE and developing infection appeared to be distinct compared with CRE carriers without infection or patients with other microbial infection or no infection and CRE colonization. Higher proportions of antimicrobial-resistant pathogens and poor representation of bacteria and metabolic pathways capable of promoting overall host health were observed in CRE carriers who developed infection, even before liver transplant. Therefore, pretransplant GM profiling could improve patient stratification and risk prediction and guide early GM-based intervention strategies to reduce infectious complications and improve overall prognosis.
RESUMEN
Background: Meropenem-vaborbactam is a recent and promising option for the treatment of KPC-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae (KPC-Kp) infections, including those resistant to ceftazidime-avibactam. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of observational data from 19 Italian hospitals on use and outcomes of patients treated with meropenem-vaborbactam for at least ≥24â hours for KPC-Kp infections. Crude and propensity-weighted multiple Cox regression models were performed to ascertain risk factors independently associated with 30-day mortality. Results: The cohort included 342 adults with bloodstream infections (n = 172) and nonbacteremic infections (n = 170), of which 107 were lower respiratory tract infections, 30 were complicated urinary tract infections, and 33 were infections involving other sites. Most infections (62.3%) were managed with meropenem-vaborbactam monotherapy, or in combination with at least 1 other active drug (usually fosfomycin, tigecycline, or gentamicin) (37.7%). The 30-day mortality rate was 31.6% (108/342). In multiple Cox regression model, 30-day mortality was independently associated with septic shock at infection onset, Charlson comorbidity index ≥ 3, dialysis, concomitant COVID-19, and INCREMENT score ≥ 8. Administration of meropenem-vaborbactam within 48â hours from infection onset was a negative predictor of mortality. All predictors, except administration of meropenem-vaborbactam within 48â hours, remained significant when the multiple Cox regression model was repeated after adjustment for the propensity score for receipt of combination therapy. Conclusions: Despite the limits of a retrospective study, the data derived from this multicenter cohort provide additional evidence on the efficacy of meropenem-vaborbactam in treating severe KPC-Kp infections, even when used as monotherapy.
RESUMEN
Sphingomonas paucimobilis occurs widely both in natural and nosocomial environments, including hospital water systems, respiratory therapy equipment, and laboratory instruments. It is an opportunistic pathogen that rarely causes infections in humans. Among S. paucimobilis nosocomial infections, osteomyelitis is particularly rare. Almost all infections occur in patients with comorbidities such as malignancy, immunosuppressant therapy, diabetes mellitus and acquired immunodeficiency syndrome. We present the first case of Sphingomonas paucimobilis osteomyelitis in an immunocompetent patient and include updated literature concerning infections by this microorganism.